Next Article in Journal
Effects of an 8-Week Abdominal Hypopressive Technique Program on Pelvic Floor Muscle Contractility: An Assessor-Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial
Previous Article in Journal
Future-Ready Skills Across Big Data Ecosystems: Insights from Machine Learning-Driven Human Resource Analytics
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Hand Dynamics in Healthy Individuals and Spinal Cord Injury Patients During Real and Virtual Box and Block Test

by
Verónica Gracia-Ibáñez
1,
Ana de los Reyes-Guzmán
2,
Margarita Vergara
1,
Néstor J. Jarque-Bou
1 and
Joaquín-Luis Sancho-Bru
1,*
1
Departamento de Ingeniería Mecánica y Construcción, Universitat Jaume I, 12071 Castellón, Spain
2
Unidad de Biomecánica y Ayudas Técnicas, Hospital Nacional de Parapléjicos, 45071 Toledo, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2025, 15(11), 5842; https://doi.org/10.3390/app15115842
Submission received: 13 April 2025 / Revised: 8 May 2025 / Accepted: 19 May 2025 / Published: 22 May 2025

Abstract

Virtual reality (VR) is a promising tool in spinal cord injury (SCI) rehabilitation, particularly through virtual adaptations of functional tests like the Box and Block test (BBT). However, a comprehensive dynamic comparison between real and virtual BBT is lacking. This study investigates the kinematic and electromyographic (EMG) differences between healthy individuals and SCI patients performing both real (RBBT) and virtual (VBBT) versions of the BBT. An electromagnetic motion-tracking system, an instrumented glove, and surface EMG electrodes were used to capture hand trajectories, joint angles, and forearm muscle activation. The analysis included cycle-averaged and temporal kinematic and EMG parameters. Our findings reveal that both groups showed increased trajectory length and velocity peaks during the VBBT, with more pronounced increases in SCI patients. Unlike healthy individuals, SCI patients also showed increased finger and thumb flexion during VBBT. Cycle-averaged EMG values were lower in healthy participants during VBBT, likely due to reduced motor demands and lack of real grasping. Conversely, SCI patients exhibited higher muscle activity, suggesting impaired coordination and compensatory overactivation. Healthy individuals showed consistent temporal kinematic synergies and muscle activation, whereas they were altered in SCI patients, especially during reaching. These findings highlight the need for rehabilitation strategies to improve motor control and feedback integration.
Keywords: virtual reality; spinal cord injury; Box and Block Test; kinematics; electromyography; rehabilitation virtual reality; spinal cord injury; Box and Block Test; kinematics; electromyography; rehabilitation

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Gracia-Ibáñez, V.; de los Reyes-Guzmán, A.; Vergara, M.; Jarque-Bou, N.J.; Sancho-Bru, J.-L. Hand Dynamics in Healthy Individuals and Spinal Cord Injury Patients During Real and Virtual Box and Block Test. Appl. Sci. 2025, 15, 5842. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15115842

AMA Style

Gracia-Ibáñez V, de los Reyes-Guzmán A, Vergara M, Jarque-Bou NJ, Sancho-Bru J-L. Hand Dynamics in Healthy Individuals and Spinal Cord Injury Patients During Real and Virtual Box and Block Test. Applied Sciences. 2025; 15(11):5842. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15115842

Chicago/Turabian Style

Gracia-Ibáñez, Verónica, Ana de los Reyes-Guzmán, Margarita Vergara, Néstor J. Jarque-Bou, and Joaquín-Luis Sancho-Bru. 2025. "Hand Dynamics in Healthy Individuals and Spinal Cord Injury Patients During Real and Virtual Box and Block Test" Applied Sciences 15, no. 11: 5842. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15115842

APA Style

Gracia-Ibáñez, V., de los Reyes-Guzmán, A., Vergara, M., Jarque-Bou, N. J., & Sancho-Bru, J.-L. (2025). Hand Dynamics in Healthy Individuals and Spinal Cord Injury Patients During Real and Virtual Box and Block Test. Applied Sciences, 15(11), 5842. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15115842

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop