Next Article in Journal
A Large-Class Few-Shot Learning Method Based on High-Dimensional Features
Previous Article in Journal
A Traffic Equilibrium Model for Multi-Modal Networks with Uncertain Demands
Previous Article in Special Issue
Finite Element Analysis (FEA) of the Stress and Strain Distribution in Cone-Morse Implant–Abutment Connection Implants Placed Equicrestally and Subcrestally
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Modern Approaches in Orthodontics and Orofacial Treatments: An Updated Perspective of Innovative Technologies

by
Antonino Lo Giudice
Department of General Surgery and Medical-Surgical Specialties, School of Dentistry, Unit of Orthodontics, University of Catania, Policlinico Universitario “Gaspare Rodolico—San Marco”, Via Santa Sofia 78, 95123 Catania, Italy
Appl. Sci. 2023, 13(23), 12842; https://doi.org/10.3390/app132312842
Submission received: 26 November 2023 / Accepted: 29 November 2023 / Published: 30 November 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Technologies for Orthodontic and Dento-Facial Rehabilitations)
The technological advancements in orthodontics and oral rehabilitation are continuous and consistent. In this regard, clinicians need to be updated concerning new tools and applications that can improve treatment effectiveness and efficiency, optimize a patient’s treatment experience and improve the clinical workflow [1]. Today, technological advancements in the medical field are synonymous with digital systems and applications aimed at diagnosis, treatment planning and patient outcomes [2]. This also arises from the study published in recent literature and, specifically, in this Special Issue where many researchers have proposed and tested new methodologies mostly involving digital tools and derivate systems [3]. In this regard, we reported a brief description of the main clinical topics that underwent significant updates in recent years in digital orthodontics and oral rehabilitations.
  • Precision and Accuracy in Diagnosis: Digital Impressions and Scanning.
Traditional methods for dental impressions have several limitations, such as distortion, discomfort and workflow efficiency. Digital scanners create accurate 3D models of a patient’s teeth, providing orthodontists with precise information for diagnosis. This accuracy contributes to more effective treatment planning [4,5].
  • Efficiency and Time Saving: 3D Printing.
The use of 3D printing in orthodontics allows for the fabrication of personalized models, appliances and aligners [6]. This technology streamlines the production process, reducing the time required to create custom orthodontic devices compared to traditional methods [7].
  • Enhanced Treatment Planning: Digital Treatment Planning Software.
Advanced software enables orthodontists to visualize treatment outcomes more accurately. With digital treatment planning, orthodontists can simulate tooth movements, predict treatment duration and communicate effectively with patients about the expected results [8,9].
  • Improved Patient Experience: Clear Aligner Technology.
Digital orthodontics has popularized clear aligners, providing patients with a more discreet and comfortable alternative to traditional braces. Clear aligners are customized using digital impressions, contributing to a better overall treatment experience [10,11].
  • Remote Monitoring and Teledentistry: Digital Monitoring Devices.
Smart orthodontic devices equipped with sensors allow for the remote monitoring of treatment progress. This facilitates timely adjustments and reduces the need for frequent in-person appointments. Tele-orthodontics, enabled by digital communication, provides greater accessibility for consultations and follow-ups [12].
  • Data-Driven Decision Making: Artificial Intelligence (AI) Integration.
AI algorithms analyze large datasets, aiding orthodontists in treatment planning and predicting outcomes. Machine learning can identify patterns and provide insights that contribute to more informed decision making, leading to personalized and effective treatment strategies [13].
  • Enhanced Patient Education: Augmented Reality (AR) and Virtual Reality (VR).
AR and VR technologies enhance patient education by providing interactive and immersive experiences. Patients can better understand their treatment plans, visualize potential outcomes and feel more engaged in their orthodontic journey [14,15,16].
  • Reduced Radiation Exposure: Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT).
CBCT imaging, while not exclusively digital orthodontics, has become an integral part of treatment planning. It offers detailed 3D images with lower radiation exposure compared to traditional CT scans, contributing to patient safety [17,18].
  • Customization and Personalization: Digital Appliances.
Three-dimensional printing and digital technologies allow for the creation of highly customized orthodontic appliances. This level of customization ensures that treatment plans are tailored to each patient’s unique dental anatomy, improving the effectiveness of orthodontic interventions [19,20].
With the increasing interest in digital technology, new studies are still warmly encouraged to investigate the effectiveness of new clinical protocols in orthodontics. These enhancements not only confer advantages to orthodontic professionals in the diagnosis and decision-making process but also augment the quality of healthcare rendered to patients, thereby making the orthodontic treatments more accessible, amenable and efficacious [21].

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Fazal, A.; Khattak, O.; Chaudhary, F.A.; Hyder, M.; Javaid, M.M.; Iqbal, A.; Albhiran, H.M.; Migdadi, F.H.; Ghawanmeh, A.M.; Bader, A.K.; et al. Barriers and challenges faced by orthodontists in providing orthodontic care and implementing new innovative technologies in the field of orthodontics among children and adults: A qualitative study. J. Clin. Pediatr. Dent. 2023, 47, 80–85. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  2. Baxi, S.; Shadani, K.; Kesri, R.; Ukey, A.; Joshi, C.; Hardiya, H. Recent advanced diagnostic aids in orthodontics. Cureus 2022, 14, e31921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Adobes Martin, M.; Lipani, E.; Alvarado Lorenzo, A.; Aiuto, R.; Garcovich, D. Trending topics in orthodontics research during the last three decades: A longitudinal bibliometric study on the top-cited articles. Orthod. Craniofac. Res. 2020, 23, 462–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Jabri, M.A.; Wu, S.; Pan, Y.; Wang, L. An overview on the veracity of intraoral digital scanning system and utilization of itero scanner for analyzing orthodontic study models both in-vivo and ex-vivo. Niger. J. Clin. Pract. 2021, 24, 1–7. [Google Scholar]
  5. Patzelt, S.B.; Bishti, S.; Stampf, S.; Att, W. Accuracy of computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing-generated dental casts based on intraoral scanner data. J. Am. Dent. Assoc. 2014, 145, 1133–1140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Grassia, V.; Ronsivalle, V.; Isola, G.; Nucci, L.; Leonardi, R.; Lo Giudice, A. Accuracy (trueness and precision) of 3d printed orthodontic models finalized to clear aligners production, testing crowded and spaced dentition. BMC Oral Health 2023, 23, 352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Tian, Y.; Chen, C.; Xu, X.; Wang, J.; Hou, X.; Li, K.; Lu, X.; Shi, H.; Lee, E.S.; Jiang, H.B. A review of 3d printing in dentistry: Technologies, affecting factors, and applications. Scanning 2021, 2021, 9950131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Ronsivalle, V.; Venezia, P.; Bennici, O.; D’Antò, V.; Leonardi, R.; Giudice, A.L. Accuracy of digital workflow for placing orthodontic miniscrews using generic and licensed open systems. A 3d imaging analysis of non-native. Stl files for guided protocols. BMC Oral Health 2023, 23, 494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Francisco, I.; Ribeiro, M.P.; Marques, F.; Travassos, R.; Nunes, C.; Pereira, F.; Caramelo, F.; Paula, A.B.; Vale, F. Application of three-dimensional digital technology in orthodontics: The state of the art. Biomimetics 2022, 7, 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Laganà, G.; Malara, A.; Lione, R.; Danesi, C.; Meuli, S.; Cozza, P. Enamel interproximal reduction during treatment with clear aligners: Digital planning versus orthocad analysis. BMC Oral Health 2021, 21, 199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Castroflorio, T.; Sedran, A.; Parrini, S.; Garino, F.; Reverdito, M.; Capuozzo, R.; Mutinelli, S.; Grybauskas, S.; Vaitiekūnas, M.; Deregibus, A. Predictability of orthodontic tooth movement with aligners: Effect of treatment design. Prog. Orthod. 2023, 24, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Migas, K.; Kozłowski, R.; Sierocka, A.; Marczak, M. Evaluation of tele-dentistry and face-to-face appointments during the provision of dental services in poland. J. Pers. Med. 2022, 12, 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Lo Giudice, A.; Ronsivalle, V.; Spampinato, C.; Leonardi, R. Fully automatic segmentation of the mandible based on convolutional neural networks (cnns). Orthod. Craniofac. Res. 2021, 24 (Suppl. 2), 100–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Ströbele, D.A.; Othman, A.; Meier, M.A.; Aboulazm, K.; von See, C. Augmented reality in orthodontics for bracket placement using conventional mobile devices: Technical note. J. World Fed. Orthod. 2023. In Press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Remschmidt, B.; Rieder, M.; Gsaxner, C.; Gaessler, J.; Payer, M.; Wallner, J. Augmented reality-guided apicoectomy based on maxillofacial cbct scans. Diagnostics 2023, 13, 3037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Minervini, G.; Franco, R.; Marrapodi, M.M.; Di Blasio, M.; Ronsivalle, V.; Cicciù, M. Children oral health and parents education status: A cross sectional study. BMC Oral Health 2023, 23, 787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Lo Giudice, A.; Ronsivalle, V.; Gastaldi, G.; Leonardi, R. Assessment of the accuracy of imaging software for 3d rendering of the upper airway, usable in orthodontic and craniofacial clinical settings. Prog. Orthod. 2022, 23, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Mota de Almeida, F.J.; Knutsson, K.; Flygare, L. The effect of cone beam ct (cbct) on therapeutic decision-making in endodontics. Dentomaxillofac. Radiol. 2014, 43, 20130137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Cunha, T.; Barbosa, I.D.S.; Palma, K.K. Orthodontic digital workflow: Devices and clinical applications. Dental Press J. Orthod. 2021, 26, e21spe26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ronsivalle, V.; Nucci, L.; Bua, N.; Palazzo, G.; La Rosa, S. Elastodontic appliances for the interception of malocclusion in children: A systematic narrative hybrid review. Children 2023, 10, 1821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Stanley, M.; Paz, A.G.; Miguel, I.; Coachman, C. Fully digital workflow, integrating dental scan, smile design and cad-cam: Case report. BMC Oral Health 2018, 18, 134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lo Giudice, A. Modern Approaches in Orthodontics and Orofacial Treatments: An Updated Perspective of Innovative Technologies. Appl. Sci. 2023, 13, 12842. https://doi.org/10.3390/app132312842

AMA Style

Lo Giudice A. Modern Approaches in Orthodontics and Orofacial Treatments: An Updated Perspective of Innovative Technologies. Applied Sciences. 2023; 13(23):12842. https://doi.org/10.3390/app132312842

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lo Giudice, Antonino. 2023. "Modern Approaches in Orthodontics and Orofacial Treatments: An Updated Perspective of Innovative Technologies" Applied Sciences 13, no. 23: 12842. https://doi.org/10.3390/app132312842

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop