Next Article in Journal
Experimental and Numerical Study on a Grouting Diffusion Model of a Single Rough Fracture in Rock Mass
Previous Article in Journal
Influence of Non-Reactive Epoxy Binder on the Permeability and Friction Coefficient of Twill-Woven Carbon Fabric in the Liquid Composite Molding Process
Previous Article in Special Issue
Monotonic and Fatigue Properties of Steel Material Manufactured by Wire Arc Additive Manufacturing
Article

Repeatability and Reproducibility Assessment of a PolyJet Technology Using X-ray Computed Tomography

Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Naval Architecture, University of Zagreb, Ivana Lucica 5, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2020, 10(20), 7040; https://doi.org/10.3390/app10207040
Received: 10 September 2020 / Revised: 6 October 2020 / Accepted: 7 October 2020 / Published: 10 October 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Progress in 3D Printing of Materials)
From the very start of their use until today, processes in Additive Manufacturing (AM) have found a way to grow from prototype production to individual and small-series production. Improvements in machinery, materials and other challenges in AM development have improved product quality, its mechanical properties and dimensional accuracy. Research in the field of dimensional accuracy must be focused on achieving better tolerances. From the beginning of AM, there has been a big issue in assuring dimensional repeatability and reproducibility of a part being printed over the course of several days. In order to examine that, a test plate was designed and built repeatedly with PolyJet technology over the course of several weeks. Measurements of dimensional accuracy and shape deviations of several typical features were carried out using X-ray Computed Tomography. Measurement results were analysed and presented in order to indicate the repeatability and reproducibility of PolyJet AM technology. Results show that PolyJet technology consistently produces parts within ±100 μm, at a 95% confidence interval, under reproducibility conditions of over a 1-month period. Accuracy for measurands (distance) in the x and y axis was significantly better than it was for the z axis which was from 56 to 197 µm, i.e., in the x and y axis, it was from −8 to 76 µm. Shape errors (i.e., cylindricity) were larger than positional or dimensional errors; this can be attributed to relatively large surface roughness and small feature sizes on the test plate that was used. View Full-Text
Keywords: dimensional accuracy; PolyJet; repeatability; reproducibility; testing plate; X-ray computed tomography dimensional accuracy; PolyJet; repeatability; reproducibility; testing plate; X-ray computed tomography
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

MDPI and ACS Style

Pilipović, A.; Baršić, G.; Katić, M.; Rujnić Havstad, M. Repeatability and Reproducibility Assessment of a PolyJet Technology Using X-ray Computed Tomography. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 7040. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10207040

AMA Style

Pilipović A, Baršić G, Katić M, Rujnić Havstad M. Repeatability and Reproducibility Assessment of a PolyJet Technology Using X-ray Computed Tomography. Applied Sciences. 2020; 10(20):7040. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10207040

Chicago/Turabian Style

Pilipović, Ana, Gorana Baršić, Marko Katić, and Maja Rujnić Havstad. 2020. "Repeatability and Reproducibility Assessment of a PolyJet Technology Using X-ray Computed Tomography" Applied Sciences 10, no. 20: 7040. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10207040

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop