You are currently viewing a new version of our website. To view the old version click .
Environments
  • Editorial
  • Open Access

5 November 2025

Research Progress in Groundwater Contamination and Treatment

and
1
Department of Environment, Ionian University, M. Minotou-Giannopoulou 26, 29100 Zakynthos, Greece
2
Division of Geo-Sciences, School of Mining and Metallurgical Engineering, National Technical University of Athens, 9 Heroon Polytechniou St., 15773 Zografou, Greece
3
Hellenic Survey of Geology and Mineral Exploration, 1 Sp. Louis St., 13677 Acharnae, Greece
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
This article belongs to the Special Issue Research Progress in Groundwater Contamination and Treatment
Groundwater constitutes approximately 99% of the total freshwater volume circulating on Earth []. It is therefore the primary source of freshwater for the global population, supporting domestic, industrial, and agricultural applications []. Its importance extends beyond human and ecological systems to encompass hydrological processes as a whole []. However, the continuous increase in population and industrial activity has led to contamination or even pollution from multiple anthropogenic sources, while natural processes such as water–rock–soil interaction via mineralogical phases dissolution, salinization, and the occurrence, mobilization, transport, and environmental fate of potentially toxic elements (PTEs), also contribute to groundwater contamination, thereby threatening water quality. Researchers worldwide are developing innovative technologies for assessing and monitoring groundwater contamination or pollution, such as real-time Internet of Things (IoT) platforms, remote sensing techniques, artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) approaches, and biosensors []. A detailed understanding of contaminant sources, pathways, and receptors enabled by these technologies is essential for the efficient design of treatment methods aimed at mitigating the impacts of groundwater contamination.
Innovative remediation methods have become a primary research focus to overcome the limitations of conventional technologies. To address these challenges, several in-situ and ex-situ approaches have been investigated, depending on the contaminant type, the distance from sensitive receptors, and the aquifer depth []. These approaches include advanced oxidation processes [], membrane-based technologies [], bioremediation [], and hybrid systems [].
This Special Issue, “Research Progress in Groundwater Contamination and Treatment,” comprises eight research articles that collectively advance the understanding of groundwater quality and treatment across various regions worldwide. Relatively few studies address advanced remediation techniques, including the synthesis of titanium dioxide/tungsten trioxide (TiO2/WO3) photocatalysts for pharmaceutical pollutants using a novel hydrothermal synthesis method, which offers advantages over conventional physical mixing by enhancing photocatalytic performance through specific structural and morphological features (contribution 1).
The groundwater quality studies explored assessed contamination across diverse geographic and hydrogeological settings. In southeast Spain, the Solana aquifer was shown to exhibit stable water quality over time, dominated by calcium carbonate facies. Principal component analysis (PCA) and hierarchical cluster analysis (HCA) techniques verified salinity differentiations based on evaporitic dissolution and anthropogenic sources of nitrate (NO3) relative to agricultural applications (contribution 2). In the Anaga Rural Park in Tenerife, Canary Islands, Spain, a UNESCO-protected area, the groundwater quality remained consistently high for over a decade due to effective soil protection and low anthropogenic pressure, highlighting the benefits of sustainable soil and groundwater management practices. In this study, the Free Residual Chlorine (FRC), in-situ chlorine (ISC), coliform bacteria, colony count at 22 °C, Escherichia coli, laboratory turbidity, in-situ turbidity, ammonium (NH4+), nitrate (NO3), pH, electrical conductivity (EC), color, odor, and taste were examined in accordance with Spanish legislation and the European Union’s (EU) Drinking Water Directive (DWD) (contribution 3). In northeastern Peloponnese, Greece, several areas were examined to assess the effectiveness of multiple geo-environmental indices for evaluating groundwater used for various purposes. Indices related to drinking and irrigation suitability, potentially toxic element (PTE) loadings, and ionic ratios were analyzed. Hydrogeochemical bivariate plots, correlation analyses, and multivariate statistical techniques (including factor analysis via PCA and hierarchical cluster analysis) were integrated to evaluate the robustness of commonly applied geo-environmental indices in groundwater quality assessments. The findings revealed lessons learned, important insights, and limitations about the successful application of the indices, highlighting the sources of PTEs in groundwater and demonstrating the need for the combined use of geo-environmental indices to ensure more dependable evaluations, as individual indices may yield misleading interpretations due to several factors (contribution 4).
In West–Central Florida, USA, two studies investigated the occurrence of fourteen pharmaceuticals and personal care products (PPCPs) in shallow lakes, revealing seasonal variations in compound concentrations and associated ecological risks, in two distinct environments; one influenced by septic tanks and the other unaffected. Liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS) analysis consistently detected theophylline, caffeine, cotinine, N,N-diethyl-meta-toluamide (DEET), and testosterone, while additional compounds were observed during the wet season. These findings aligned with the risk quotients that exhibited higher risks for algae, crustaceans, and fishes during the same period, particularly in lakes surrounded by septic tanks, as was expected (contributions 5 & 6). In Limpopo Province, South Africa, groundwater chemistry was influenced by both natural and anthropogenic factors. Sodium adsorption ratio (SAR) analysis revealed high sodium (Na+) concentrations that caused low water quality, while PCA identified the presence of PTEs, including vanadium (V) in very high concentrations. Microbial assessments indicated that water was suitable for both drinking and irrigation (contribution 7). In the Eastern Niger Delta, Nigeria, groundwater near petroleum infrastructure exhibited high concentrations of benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylene (BTEX), with increasing distance from the pipelines. Although the aquifer’s natural aerobic attenuation potential provided partial mitigation of hydrocarbon contamination, complete decontamination would require a prolonged period, indicating that natural attenuation alone is insufficient (contribution 8).
Collectively, these studies illustrate the importance of integrating different technologies, including also conventional techniques and innovative tools, as well as hydrochemical characterization, advanced monitoring techniques, risk assessment, and innovative remediation strategies to safeguard groundwater resources globally. The active involvement of multiple stakeholders, including researchers, policymakers, and citizens, is crucial to promote the implementation of these approaches in large-scale applications. Such collaboration is key to ensuring equitable access to clean water and the sustainable management of groundwater resources in line with the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).
This Special Issue highlights the current research advancements in distinguishing the sources and pathways of groundwater contamination, as well as exploring remediation techniques and strategies, with a focus on evaluating the effectiveness and feasibility of various treatment methods. For future studies, it will be necessary to integrate fieldwork, laboratory experiments, modeling approaches, and innovative methodologies such as ML and multiple-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) to gain an in-depth understanding of the factors affecting groundwater contamination and treatment. Emerging contaminants such as per and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), micro/nanoplastics (e.g., polyethylene, polypropylene, polyvinyl chloride, polyethylene terephthalate, and polyamide), PPCPs, and pesticides, together with PTEs (e.g., arsenic—As; chromium—Cr; lead— Pb; mercury—Hg; cadmium—Cd; zinc—Zn; antimony—Sb, etc.) and the use of environmental isotopic signatures (e.g., δ53Cr, 87Sr/86Sr, 206Pb/204Pb, 207Pb/204Pb, 208Pb/204Pb, δ11B, δ15NΝO3, and δ18OΝO3), have become prominent research hotspots in environmental science.
We are deeply grateful to the authors for sharing their innovative ideas and pioneering methods in this Special Issue. Our sincere thanks also go to the reviewers, whose dedication and insightful evaluations have been invaluable throughout the process. It has been a genuine pleasure to collaborate with the Environments Editorial Office staff, whose professionalism and teamwork made this endeavor both rewarding and enjoyable. We would also like to extend our heartfelt thanks to Ms. Maria Chen, whose decisive contributions were essential to the successful completion of this Special Issue. Her support was consistently generous and dependable, and she played a key role in the overall success of this project. This collection aspires to foster sustained interdisciplinary collaboration and innovation at the nexus of environmental science, geochemistry, hydrogeology, environmental engineering, and public health, advancing knowledge and practical approaches for the protection and remediation of groundwater resources.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

List of Contributions

1.
Ghiloufi, M.; Schnabel, T.; Springer, C.; Mehling, S.; Wolfram, A.; Touati, F.; Kouass, S. Hydrothermal Versus Physical Mixing: Superior Photocatalytic Activity of TiO2/WO3 Nanocomposites for Water Treatment Applications. Environments 2025, 12, 359. https://doi.org/10.3390/environments12100359.
2.
Sala-Sala, V.; Andreu, J.M.; Pérez-Gimeno, A.; Jordán, M.M.; Navarro-Pedreño, J.; Almendro-Candel, M.B. Spatial and Multivariate Analysis of Groundwater Hydrochemistry in the Solana Aquifer, SE Spain. Environments 2025, 12, 323. https://doi.org/10.3390/environments12090323.
3.
Rodríguez-Alcántara, J.S.; Cruz-Pérez, N.; Rodríguez-Martín, J.; García-Gil, A.; Koritnik, J.; Santamarta, J.C. Improving Groundwater Quality Through Biosphere Reserve Management: Insights from the Anaga Reserve, Tenerife. Environments 2025, 12, 53. https://doi.org/10.3390/environments12020053.
4.
Papazotos, P.; Vlachomitrou, M.; Psarraki, D.; Vasileiou, E.; Perraki, M. Coupling Advanced Geo-Environmental Indices for the Evaluation of Groundwater Quality: A Case Study in NE Peloponnese, Greece. Environments 2025, 12, 14. https://doi.org/10.3390/environments12010014.
5.
Bialkowska-Jelinska, E.; van Beynen, P.; Calcul, L. Seasonality of Pharmaceuticals and Personal Care Products in Shallow Lakes, Florida, USA—Part A. Environments 2025, 12, 219. https://doi.org/10.3390/environments12070219.
6.
Bialkowska-Jelinska, E.; van Beynen, P.; Calcul, L. Assessing Environmental Risk Posed by Pharmaceuticals and Personal Care Products in Shallow Lakes, Florida, USA—Part B. Environments 2025, 12, 231. https://doi.org/10.3390/environments12070231.
7.
Shokoohi, E.; Moyo, N. Groundwater Quality in a Rural and Urbanized Region in Limpopo Province, South Africa. Environments 2025, 12, 174. https://doi.org/10.3390/environments12060174.
8.
Aleku, D.L.; Biester, H.; Pichler, T. Pipeline-Related Residential Benzene Exposure and Groundwater Natural Attenuation Capacity in the Eastern Niger Delta, Nigeria. Environments 2024, 11, 221. https://doi.org/10.3390/environments11100221.

References

  1. Younger, P.L. Groundwater in the Environment: An Introduction; John Wiley & Sons: New York, NY, USA, 2009; ISBN 1-4443-0904-8. [Google Scholar]
  2. Li, P.; Karunanidhi, D.; Subramani, T.; Srinivasamoorthy, K. Sources and Consequences of Groundwater Contamination. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2021, 80, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Giordano, M. Global Groundwater? Issues and Solutions. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 2009, 34, 153–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Robles, K.P.V.; Monjardin, C.E.F. Assessment and Monitoring of Groundwater Contaminants in Heavily Urbanized Areas: A Review of Methods and Applications for Philippines. Water 2025, 17, 1903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Petala, A.; Arvaniti, O.S.; Travlou, G.; Mantzavinos, D.; Frontistis, Z. Solar Light Induced Photocatalytic Removal of Sulfamethoxazole from Water and Wastewater Using BiOCl Photocatalyst. J. Environ. Sci. Health Part A 2021, 56, 963–972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Foorginezhad, S.; Zerafat, M.M.; Ismail, A.F.; Goh, P.S. Emerging Membrane Technologies for Sustainable Water Treatment: A Review on Recent Advances. Environ. Sci. Adv. 2025, 4, 530–570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Romantschuk, M.; Lahti-Leikas, K.; Kontro, M.; Galitskaya, P.; Talvenmäki, H.; Simpanen, S.; Allen, J.A.; Sinkkonen, A. Bioremediation of Contaminated Soil and Groundwater by In Situ Biostimulation. Front. Microbiol. 2023, 14, 1258148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Anandan, S.; Kumar Ponnusamy, V.; Ashokkumar, M. A Review on Hybrid Techniques for the Degradation of Organic Pollutants in Aqueous Environment. Ultrason. Sonochem. 2020, 67, 105130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Article Metrics

Citations

Article Access Statistics

Article metric data becomes available approximately 24 hours after publication online.