Next Article in Journal
Soil Moisture Estimation in South-Eastern New Mexico Using High Resolution Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) Data
Next Article in Special Issue
A Review of Advances in the Identification and Characterization of Groundwater Dependent Ecosystems Using Geospatial Technologies
Previous Article in Journal
Gibbs Free Energy of Formation for Selected Platinum Group Minerals (PGM)
Open AccessArticle

Handling of Human-Geosphere Intersections

Directorate-General for Research and Innovation, European Commission, Avenue du Loi 200, Brussels 1149, Belgium
Academic Editor: Jesus Martinez-Frias
Geosciences 2016, 6(1), 3;
Received: 12 November 2015 / Revised: 15 December 2015 / Accepted: 16 December 2015 / Published: 6 January 2016
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Geosciences and Future Earth)
This essay introduces the notion of “human-geosphere intersections”, describes “engineering” as an aspect of anthropogenic global change, and reflects on particular “paradigms” that may govern human-geosphere intersections. Seen conceptually, engineering is undertaken to meet needs and preferences of people within a composite framework of technological means, scientific insights, worldviews, and value system. Nowadays, the engineering of production systems, of consumption patterns, and of related intersections of human activities with the biotic and abiotic environments is a central feature of the anthropogenic global change process. In the last centuries, the cultural evolution of humankind took a development path that now is furthering an engineered planetary process to intersect properties of the geo-biosphere with the noosphere (“human-geosphere intersections”). Four paradigms, ”adjustment”, “dovetailing”, “decoupling” and “modulating” are discussed, which may frame the engineering of human-geosphere intersections. These paradigms convene different insights into how bio-geosphere and noosphere function, how to alter human-geosphere intersections, and how engineering mediates between both spheres. Whatever paradigm is retained to engineer human-geosphere intersections, geoscience know-how has to be part of the noosphere, and geo-ethics should provide an orientation how human activities and geosphere should intersect. View Full-Text
Keywords: global environmental change; education and ethics; public engagement; social resilience global environmental change; education and ethics; public engagement; social resilience
MDPI and ACS Style

Bohle, M. Handling of Human-Geosphere Intersections. Geosciences 2016, 6, 3.

AMA Style

Bohle M. Handling of Human-Geosphere Intersections. Geosciences. 2016; 6(1):3.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bohle, Martin. 2016. "Handling of Human-Geosphere Intersections" Geosciences 6, no. 1: 3.

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

Search more from Scilit
Back to TopTop