Erratum: Rodrigues, L.; Amezcua, R.; Cassar, G.; O’Sullivan, T.; Friendship, R. Comparison of Single, Fixed-Time Artificial Insemination in Gilts Using Two Different Protocols to Synchronize Ovulation. Animals 2020, 10, 306

Lima Rodrigues; Rocio Amezcua; Glen Cassar; Terri L O’Sullivan; Robert Friendship

doi:10.3390/ani10040641

,

and

Department of Population Medicine, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G2W1, Canada

^*

Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.

Animals2020, 10(4), 641;https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10040641

This article belongs to the Special Issue Pig Reproduction

Version Notes

Order Reprints

The authors wish to make the following corrections to their paper [1]:

The heading “Conclusions” should be inserted before the final paragraph of the Discussion.

The following citations in the ‘Discussion’ should be changed:

[5] replaced by [7].

[7] replaced by [13].

[8] replaced by [14].

[9] replaced by [5].

[10] replaced by [15].

In the Discussion, in the paragraph which begins with ‘Ultrasound assessment’, a new citation, [10], should be inserted after the following sentence: The ovulation results of the present study are similar to those of other studies.

References

Rodrigues, L.; Amezcua, R.; Cassar, G.; O’Sullivan, T.; Friendship, R. Comparison of single, fixed-time artificial insemination in gilts using two different protocols to synchronize ovulation. Animals 2020, 10, 306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]

© 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Erratum: Rodrigues, L.; Amezcua, R.; Cassar, G.; O’Sullivan, T.; Friendship, R. Comparison of Single, Fixed-Time Artificial Insemination in Gilts Using Two Different Protocols to Synchronize Ovulation. Animals 2020, 10, 306

References

Article Metrics

Citations

Article Access Statistics