Since the introduction of the term holobiont [], the scientific interest on the associations between microbes and various hosts—namely plants, animals, and other microbes—boomed, especially the last decade. Indeed, the investigation of the microbe–host associations has stemmed a truly interdisciplinary science, whereby hypotheses are generated and answered from groups of distant disciplines at first sight. Today, we know that practically all investigated animal organisms harbor diverse and multifunctional microbiota. However, as such complex systems remain elusive for a full description of their biological relations, the first step, that of discerning which microbe is found on or in which tissue of a specific animal, remains essential to deepen our knowledge on holobionts. Taking into account the hundreds of thousands to millions of prokaryotic cell abundance in the aquatic environment, it is realistic for aquatic animals, along with their associated microbiota, to be seen as microbial ecosystems swimming in seas, lakes or rivers of microbes. Moreover, as we get a sharper insight on these associations, symbiotic microbes can reciprocally interact with the aquatic environment even at the ecosystem level [,]. The articles published in the special issue “Gut Microorganisms of Aquatic Animals” are a contribution towards the scientific efforts to unravel some of the associations between freshwater [], ornamental [] and marine [,,] fish, as well as shrimp [,,] and their microbes. These papers cover multiple issues on aquatic animal–microbe interactions: healthy or diseased fish, the impact of pollution and handling practices on fish gut microbiota, and the effect of probiotics in the gut. Such associations are now widely recognized as highly important to aquaculture [,].
Acknowledgments
I would like to thank all authors who contributed their excellent papers to this Special Issue. I particularly thank the reviewers for their valuable help in further improving all manuscripts before being published to the highest standard of quality.
Conflicts of Interest
The author declares no conflict of interest.
References
- Margulis, L. Symbiosis as a Source of Evolutionary Innovation; MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1991. [Google Scholar]
- Wong, S.; Rawls, J.F. Intestinal Microbiota Composition in Fishes Is Influenced by Host Ecology and Environment. Mol. Ecol. 2012, 21, 3100–3102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Troussellier, M.; Escalas, A.; Bouvier, T.; Mouillot, D. Sustaining rare marine microorganisms: Macroorganisms as repositories and dispersal agents of microbial diversity. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gauthier, J.; Rouleau-Breton, S.; Charette, S.J.; Derome, N. Stimulated Growth and Innate Immunity in Brook Charr (Salvelinus fontinalis) Treated with a General Probiotic (Bactocell®) and Two Endogenous Probiotics That Inhibit Aeromonas salmonicida In Vitro. Microorganisms 2019, 7, 193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Amaral-Zettler, L.A.; Schmidt, V.; Smith, K.F. Microbial Community and Potential Pathogen Shifts along an Ornamental Fish Supply Chain. Microorganisms 2018, 6, 91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gupta, S.; Fernandes, J.; Kiron, V. Antibiotic-Induced Perturbations Are Manifested in the Dominant Intestinal Bacterial Phyla of Atlantic Salmon. Microorganisms 2019, 7, 233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Nikouli, E.; Meziti, A.; Antonopoulou, E.; Mente, E.; Kormas, K.A. Gut Bacterial Communities in Geographically Distant Populations of Farmed Sea Bream (Sparus aurata) and Sea Bass (Dicentrarchus labrax). Microorganisms 2018, 6, 92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Walter, J.M.; Bagi, A.; Pampanin, D.M. Insights into the Potential of the Atlantic Cod Gut Microbiome as Biomarker of Oil Contamination in the Marine Environment. Microorganisms 2019, 7, 209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Landsman, A.; St-Pierre, B.; Rosales-Leija, M.; Brown, M.; Gibbons, W. Investigation of the Potential Effects of Host Genetics and Probiotic Treatment on the Gut Bacterial Community Composition of Aquaculture-raised Pacific Whiteleg Shrimp, Litopenaeus vannamei. Microorganisms 2019, 7, 217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Landsman, A.; St-Pierre, B.; Rosales-Leija, M.; Brown, M.; Gibbons, W. Impact of Aquaculture Practices on Intestinal Bacterial Profiles of Pacific Whiteleg Shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei. Microorganisms 2019, 7, 93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pilotto, M.R.; Goncalves, A.N.A.; Vieira, F.N.; Seifert, W.Q.; Bachère, E.; Rosa, R.D.; Perazzolo, L.M. Exploring the Impact of the Biofloc Rearing System and an Oral WSSV Challenge on the Intestinal Bacteriome of Litopenaeus vannamei. Microorganisms 2018, 6, 83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tarnecki, A.M.; Burgos, F.A.; Ray, C.L.; Arias, C.R. Fish Intestinal Microbiome: Diversity and Symbiosis Unravelled By Metagenomics. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2017, 123, 2–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ringø, E.; Zhou, Z.; Vecino, J.L.G.; Wadsworth, S.; Romero, J.; Krogdahl, Å.; Olsen, R.E.; Dimitroglou, A.; Foey, A.; Davies, S.; et al. Effect of Dietary Components on the Gut Microbiota of Aquatic Animals. A Never-Ending Story? Aquac. Nutr. 2016, 22, 219–282. [Google Scholar]
© 2019 by the author. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).