Next Article in Journal
Sub-Inhibitory Concentrations of Metronidazole Enhance Production, Virulence Factor Loading, and Endothelial Cytotoxicity of Porphyromonas gingivalis Extracellular Vesicles
Next Article in Special Issue
Characterization of an Atypical GH19 Family Chitinase from Vibrio jasicida KMM 6832
Previous Article in Journal
Impact of Switching from Oral to Long-Acting Injectable Cabotegravir and Rilpivirine on the Lipid Profile of HIV-Positive Patients
Previous Article in Special Issue
Alteromonas nitratireducens sp. nov., a Novel Nitrate-Reducing Bacterium Isolated from Marine Sediments, and the Evolution of Nitrate-Reducing Genes in the Genus Alteromonas
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Genome-Based Reclassification of [Bizionia] algoritergicola Bowman and Nichols 2005 as Algorimicrobium algoritergicola gen. nov., comb. nov. and description of Algorimicrobium bowmanii sp. nov.

by
Valeriya Kurilenko
1,*,
Evgeniya Bystritskaya
1,
Nadezhda Otstavnykh
1,
Peter Velansky
2,
Sergey Baldaev
1,
Viacheslav Eremeev
1,
Natalya Ageenko
2,
Konstantin Kiselev
3,
Olga Nedashkovskaya
1 and
Marina Isaeva
1,*
1
G.B. Elyakov Pacific Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Far Eastern Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences, Prospect 100 Let Vladivostoku, 159, Vladivostok 690022, Russia
2
A.V. Zhirmunsky National Scientific Center of Marine Biology, Far Eastern Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences, Palchevskogo Street 17, Vladivostok 690041, Russia
3
Federal Scientific Center of the East Asia Terrestrial Biodiversity, Far Eastern Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Vladivostok 690022, Russia
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Microorganisms 2026, 14(1), 24; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms14010024
Submission received: 28 November 2025 / Revised: 18 December 2025 / Accepted: 19 December 2025 / Published: 21 December 2025

Abstract

The genus Bizionia, a member of the Bacteroidota phylum, is considered a polyphyletic taxonomic group requiring a phylogenetic revision of its members. A novel strain 041-53-Ur-6T was isolated from the cavity fluid of the sea urchin Strongylocentrotus intermedius from the Sea of Okhotsk. Analysis of the 16S rRNA gene sequence showed that 041-53-Ur-6T belongs to the family Flavobacteriaceae, and its closest neighbor is [Bizionia] algoritergicola with 97.5% sequence similarity. Phylogenomic analysis confirmed the phylogenetic heterogeneity of the genus Bizionia and the clear separation of the genera “Algorimicrobium” and Hanstruepera. The inter-genus AAI values between them were 74.0–76.4%, which is slightly lower than the inter-species AAI values observed for each genus. The strain 041-53-Ur-6T (= KMM 8389T) formed a separated branch within the [B.] algoritergicola clade, demonstrating the highest ANI/AAI values of 80.1/81.0% with the strain [B.] algoritergicola APA-1T. The dDDH values between strain KMM 8389T and representatives of the genus “Algorimicrobium” ranged from 22.6% to 26.7%. Major fatty acids were iso-C15:1 ω10c, iso-C15:0 and iso-C15:0 Δ2-OH. The polar lipids included a phosphatidylethanolamine, a phosphatidylglycerol, five unidentified lipids, two unidentified aminolipids, a phosphatidylcholine, and an unidentified aminophospholipid. The genome KMM 8389T is a circular chromosome of 3,031,910 bp in size with a DNA G + C content of 33.5%. It comprises 2702 protein-coding genes and four rrn operons. Functional genomic analysis indicated the potential of KMM 8389T for degrading starch, glycogen, and alginate due to the presence of genes encoding GH13, GH31, and GH65. Furthermore, KMM 8389T possessed PLs 6, 7, 12, and 17, specialized for alginate, confirming the potential adaptation of this strain to algal substrates and surfaces. On the basis of the results of genotypic, chemotaxonomic, and phenotypic analyses, it is clear that the strain KMM 8389T represents a novel species with [B.] algoritergicola, [B.] argentinensis, [B.] echini, [B.] hallyeonensis, [B.] myxarmorum, [B.] psychrotolerans, and [B.] sediminis as the nearest neighbors. These taxa are classified in a single novel genus, as Algorimicrobium algoritergicola gen. nov., comb. nov., A. argentinensis comb. nov., A. echini comb. nov., A. hallyeonensis comb. nov., A. myxarmorum comb. nov., A. psychrotolerans comb. nov., A. sediminis comb. nov., and Algorimicrobium bowmanii sp. nov. 041-53-Ur-6T (=KMM 8389T, =KCTC 72011T).

1. Introduction

The Bacteroidota phylum is a cosmopolitan phylum with members found throughout a variety of habitats on Earth. A distinctive feature of these bacteria is the ability to decompose carbohydrates. Classification of the phylum Bacteroidota is a challenge requiring the use of comparative genomic analysis. Marina Gorcia-Lopez and co-authors performed a phylogenetic analysis of 1000 genomes of the phylum Bacteroidota (formally “Bacteroidetes”) [1]. The authors showed that some taxa require revision, for example, the genus Bizionia, which is non-monophyletic. In the 16S rRNA gene tree, the two species, [B.] echini and [B.] argentinensis, formed a well-supported clade together with [B.] algoritergicola, [B.] hallyonensis, [B.] myxarmorum, [B.] psychrotolerans, and B. sediminis. While this clade was generally well supported, support for the monophyly of the entire genus Bizionia was no longer present in the published 16S rRNA gene trees used to describe the most recent species. Obtaining monophyletic genera by merging all the hybrid genera with Bizionia would introduce a huge number of changes and is also considered inappropriate, given the genomic and phenotypic divergence of the group. Thus, it was proposed to combine the strains of [B.] algoritergicola, [B.] argentinensis, [B.] echini, [B.] hallyeonensis, [B.] myxarmorum, [B.] psychrotolerans, and [B.] sediminis into a new genus named “Algorimicrobium” in honor of [B.] algoritergicola, as the first species described from this group.
The genus Bizionia was established by Nedashkovskaya et al. (2005) [2]. To date, 13 species with valid nomenclature have been described in the genus Bizionia (https://lpsn.dsmz.de/genus/bizionia, accessed on 26 November 2025). These bacteria have been isolated from Antarctic surface seawater, coastal Antarctic areas, and various marine invertebrates (a mussel, a coral, a sea cucumber, and a sea urchin), as well as from fish [2,3,4,5].
In this work, we report the isolation and identification of novel halotolerant, Gram-negative, aerobic, and orange-pigmented marine bacteria. On the basis of the results of genotypic, chemotaxonomic, and phenotypic analyses, it is clear that the isolates represent a novel species, with [B.] algoritergicola CIP 108533T [6], [B.] argentinensis JUB59T [7], [B.] echini KMM 6177T [8], [B.] hallyeonensis KCTC 23881T [9], [B.] myxarmorum CIP 108535T [6], [B.] psychrotolerans KCCM 43042T [10], and [B.] sediminis KCTC 42587T [11] as the nearest neighbors. These taxa are classified in a single novel genus, such as Algorimicrobium algoritergicola gen. nov., comb. nov., A. argentinensis comb. nov., A. echini comb. nov., A. hallyeonensis comb. nov., A. myxarmorum comb. nov., A. psychrotolerans comb. nov., A. sediminis comb. nov., and Algorimicrobium bowmanii sp. nov.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Isolation and Phenotypic Characterization of Bacteria

The sea urchin Strongylocentrotus intermedius was collected by bottom trawl at a depth of 400 m in July 2011 during scientific expedition No. 41 on the R/V “Akademik Oparin” in the Vries Strait (45.500000, 148.941668), Iturup Island, Kuril Islands, Sea of Okhotsk, Russia. Strain 041-53-Ur-6T was isolated from the cavity fluid of this sea urchin and stored at −70 °C in the DifcoTM Marine Broth 2216 (Becton Dickenson, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) (MB 2216) supplemented with 20% (v/v) glycerol. Strain 041-53-Ur-6T was deposited to the Collection of Marine Microorganisms (KMM), G. B. Elyakov Pacific Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry (PIBOC), Far Eastern Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences (FEB RAS), Russia, under the number of KMM 8389T and to the Korean Collection for Type Cultures (KCTC), Korea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology, Republic of Korea, under the number of KCTC 72011T. The type strains, [B.] algoritergicola CIP 108533T (= APA-1T = ACAM 1056T), [B.] myxarmorum CIP 108535T (= ADA-4T = ACAM 1058T), and [B.] echini KMM 6177T (= KCTC 22015T = LMG 25220T) were kindly provided by Nedashkovskaya O. I. The type strains, [B.] algoritergicola CIP 108533T (= APA-1T = ACAM 1056T) and [B.] myxarmorum CIP 108535T (= ADA-4T = ACAM 1058T), were deposited at the KMM, PIBOC FEB RAS, under numbers KMM 8430T and KMM 8431T, respectively. All strains used in this study for phenotypic tests and lipid analyses were grown on/in MB 2216 and MA 2216, if not stated otherwise. Gram-staining was examined according to the standard method, oxidase activity was determined using tetramethyl-p-phenylenediamine, and catalase activity was determined using 3% hydrogen peroxide [12]. Gliding motility was observed according to the method of Bowman [13]. The morphology of cells negatively stained with a 1% phosphotungstic acid was examined using electronic transmission microscopy Libra 120 (Carl Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany), provided by A. V. Zhirmunsky National Scientific Center of Marine Biology, FEB RAS, using cells grown in MB 2216 on carbon-coated 200-mesh copper grids. The tests, including hydrolysis of starch, gelatin, L-tyrosine, chitin, casein, DNA, and nitrate reduction (sulfanilic acid/α-naphthylamine test), growth at different salinities (0–10% NaCl), temperatures (5–40 °C), and pH values (4.0–11.5) were carried out as described by Smibert and Krieg (1994) [12]. The medium MA 2216 (or MB 2216) was used as a basal, while mannitol and CaCO3 were omitted for the determination of substrate hydrolysis and pH, respectively. Formation of H2S from thiosulfate was tested in the MB 2216 using a lead acetate paper strip. Biochemical tests for all studied strains and KMM 8389T using API 20E, API 20NE, and API ZYM (bioMérieux, Marcy-l’Étoile, France) were performed as described by the manufacturer [14]. Carbon source utilization was performed with the API 50 CHB/E tests (bioMérieux, Marcy-l’Étoile, France) according to the manufacturer’s instructions [15].
Antibiotic susceptibility of strains studied was examined on MA 2216 plates using commercial paper discs (Research Centre of Pharmacotherapy, St. Petersburg) impregnated with the following antibiotics (µg per disc, unless otherwise indicated): ampicillin (10), benzylpenicillin (10 U), vancomycin (30), gentamicin (10), kanamycin (30), carbenicillin (100), chloramphenicol (30), neomycin (30), oxacillin (10), oleandomycin (15), lincomycin (15), ofloxacin (5), rifampicin (5), polymyxin (300 U), streptomycin (30), cephazolin (30), cephalexin (30), erythromycin (15), nalidixic acid (30), tetracycline (30), and doxycycline (10). For polar lipid and fatty acid analyses, strain KMM 8389T and one related type strain were cultivated on MA 2216 at 24 °C for 24 h. Lipids were extracted using a chloroform–methanol–water (2:2:1, by vol.); after phase separation, the lower chloroform layer was collected [16]. Two-dimensional thin layer chromatography of polar lipids was carried out on Silica gel 60 F 254 (10 × 10 cm, Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) using chloroform–methanol–water (65:25:4, v/v) for the first direction, and chloroform–methanol–acetic acid–water (80:12:15:4, v/v) for the second one [17]. Lipids were detected by sequentially spraying with 0.25% ninhydrin in acetone (for detecting amino group-containing lipids) [18], molybdate reagent (for detecting phospholipids) [19], and 5% sulphuric acid in methanol, followed by heating at 130 °C [18]. Respiratory lipoquinones were analyzed by the reversed-phase HPLC using a modified method [20]. A Shimadzu LC–30 chromatograph with a photodiode array detector (SPD–M30A), equipped with Shimpack ODS II (150 × 2.1 mm) column, was used. The column temperature was 40 °C, isocratic elution with methanol–isopropanol (7:3) with the addition of 0.1% of formic acid was used. Fatty acid methyl esters (FAMEs) were prepared according to the procedure of the Microbial Identification System (MIDI) [21]. The quantitative analysis of FAMEs was performed using the GC–2010 chromatograph (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) equipped with a capillary column SH–Rtx–5 ms (30 m × 0.25 mm I.D.) (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan). The temperature was programmed from 160 °C to 250 °C, at a rate of 2 °C/min. Identification of FAMEs was accomplished by equivalent chain length values and by comparing the retention times of the samples to those of standards. In addition, FAMEs were analyzed using a GC-MS Shimadzu model QP2020 (column SH–Rtx–5 ms, the temperature program from 160 °C to 250 °C, at a rate of 2 °C/min).

2.2. 16S rRNA Gene Sequence and Phylogenetic Analysis

The DNA of strain 041-53-Ur-6T (= KMM 8389T) was extracted using the NucleoSpin Tissue kit (Macherey–Nagel, Düren, Germany) and used for PCR-amplification and sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene as described previously [22]. The obtained sequence was compared with the 16S rRNA gene sequences of validly published type strains using the nucleotide similarity search tool on the EzBioCloud server, accessed on 20 November 2025 [23]. The 16S rRNA phylogenetic relationships of strain KMM 8389ᵀ, along with those of closely related type strains, were estimated by the GGDC web server (http://ggdc.dsmz.de/, updated on 20 November 2025) [24] using the DSMZ phylogenomics pipeline [25]. Maximum likelihood (ML) and maximum parsimony (MP) trees were inferred from the alignment with RAxML [26] and TNT [27], respectively, with bootstrap analysis of 1000 replicates.

2.3. Whole-Genome Sequencing and Genome-Based Phylogenetic Analysis

The DNA library for KMM 8389T was prepared with Nextera DNA Flex kit (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) and subsequently sequenced on an Illumina MiSeq instrument using paired-end runs with a 150 bp read length. The nanopore library was obtained with SQK-NBD114.96 kit (Oxford Nanopore Technologies, Oxford, UK) and sequenced on the MinION, flow cell FLO-MIN 114 (Oxford Nanopore Technologies, Oxford, UK). Basecalling was performed using Dorado (v. 1.0.2). Resulting short and long reads were trimmed and filtered using Trimmomatic (quality over 30, length over 100) v. 0.39 [28] and chopper (quality over 16, length over 2000, v. 0.10.0) [29], respectively. The quality of processed reads was assessed with FastQC v. 0.11.8 (https://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc/, accessed on 10 June 2025). The filtered reads were used for hybrid assembly with Autocycler v. 0.5.0 [30]. The pipeline facilitated the obtainment of four subsets of long reads, which were then assembled independently using flye v. 2.9.2 [31], canu v. 2.2 [32], miniasm v. 0.3 [33], nextdenovo v. 2.5.1 [34], plassempler v. 1.8.0 [35], and raven v. 1.8.3 [36] as advised by the Autocycler manual. Additionally, the same four subsets underwent a hybrid assembly with a set of short reads using unicycler v. 0.5.0 [37] with default parameters. The resulting assemblies were then combined into a single consensus assembly, which was additionally polished with pilon v. 1.24 [38]. Sequencing depth was estimated utilizing samtools v. 1.3 [39]. The genome completeness and contamination were assessed with CheckM v. 1.1.3 [40]. Gene annotation was performed with RAST [41] and NCBI PGAP [42]. The chromosomal replication origin was located using Ori-Finder 2022 [43].
Genome-based phylogeny was performed using PhyloPhlAn v. 3.0.1 [44] with the provided dataset of 400 conserved proteins, and an ML tree was reconstructed by RAxML v. 8.2.12 [26] under the LG + Γ model with non-parametric bootstrapping of 100 replicates. The average pairwise values of Nucleotide Acid Identity (ANI), Amino Acid Identity (AAI), and in silico DNA–DNA hybridization (dDDH) were estimated by fastANI [45], EzAAI [46], and TYGS platform [47], respectively.

2.4. Functional Genomic Analysis

The pan-genome of the “Algorimicrobium” and Bizionia type strains with metabolism analysis was carried out using the Anvi’o workflow v. 8 as described at https://merenlab.org/2016/11/08/pangenomics-v2/, accessed 21 November 2025 [48].
Carbohydrate-active enzymes (CAZymes) and CAZyme-containing gene clusters were automatically annotated by an online server, dbCAN3 v. 10 (http://bcb.unl.edu/dbCAN2/, accessed on 10 November 2025) [49,50]. Biosynthetic gene clusters of secondary metabolites were identified and annotated using the antiSMASH server, v. 8. (https://antismash.secondarymetabolites.org, accessed on 10 November 2025) [51]. Identification of the Secretion Systems components was conducted with MacSyFinder v. 2.1.4 (TXSScan-1.1.3) [52]. The heat maps and bar plots were visualized using the pheatmap v. 1.0.12 and ggplot2 v. 3.5.1 packages in RStudio v. RStudio/2024.09.1+394 with R v. 4.4.2. Fonts and sizes in all figures were edited manually in Adobe Photoshop CC 2018 for better visualization. The functional and ecological analyses of the strain were performed using the Protologger web tool [53], https://www.protologger.de/, accessed 10 November 2025.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Phylogenetic Analyses

To roughly estimate the taxonomic status of strain 041-53-Ur-6T (= KMM 8389ᵀ), the 16S rDNA sequence was amplified (1368 bp long), sequenced, and compared with those of type strains on the EzBioCloud server [23]. The highest sequence similarity of 97.3–97.5% was revealed with [B.] echini DSM 23925T, [B.] hallyeonensis T-y7T, and [B.] algoritergicola APA-1T. Similarity values with other validly published Bizionia species were between 95.2% (B. paragorgiae KMM 6029T) and 97.0% ([B.] psychrotolerans PB-M7T). It indicated that KMM 8389T can represent a novel species of the genus Bizionia.
To determine the phylogenetic position of KMM 8389ᵀ among type strains of the genus Bizionia and some closely related genera, 16S rRNA phylogenetic trees were reconstructed (Figure 1). On these trees, KMM 8389ᵀ formed a distinct branch inside the [B.] algoritergicola clade (“Algorimicrobium”). Furthermore, on the Bizionia 16S rRNA tree (Figure S1), KMM 8389ᵀ was clearly grouped with the [B.] algoritergicola clade, as confirmed by high bootstrap values.
It has been known that the monophyly of the genus Bizionia is not supported by 16S rRNA data [1]. The observed taxonomic discrepancies concern [B.] algoritergicola, [B.] argentinensis, [B.] echini, [B.] hallyeonensis, [B.] myxarmorum, [B.] psychrotolerans, [B.] sediminis, and [B.] arctica; the first eight species are grouped into one clade (the [B.] algoritergicola clade), which is closer to the type species Hanstruepera neustonica [54] than the type species B. paragorgiae [2]. The phylogenetic position of [B.] arctica is uncertain due to its clustering with some type strains of Formosa and Xanthomarina caused by the low resolution of 16S rRNA genes. While genome sequences were available only for three Bizionia species, the phylogenomic analysis showed that [B.] algoritergicola and [B.] argentinensis grouped together but not with the type species B. paragorgiae. This allowed the authors to propose a new genus, “Algorimicrobium” encompassing the eight species, naming the genus after the first described species of this group, [B.] algoritergicola [1]. However, at the time of writing, the name of the new genus had not yet been approved; therefore, we continue to use its name “Algorimicrobium” as a synonym.
In this study, ten genomic sequences of Bizionia type strains, including [B.] arctica, were used for a comprehensive phylogenomic analysis. The list of these strains is given in Table 1. The genome sequence of [B.] psychrotolerans PB-M7T was not taken in the analysis due to the small quantity of genomic data (GCA_001039595.1, ASM103959v1).
To determine species boundaries, overall genomic relatedness indices (OGRIs) between 041-53-Ur-6T (= KMM 8389ᵀ), Bizionia, and “Algorimicrobium” type strains were assessed. The ANI values between strain KMM 8389ᵀ and “A. algoritergicola” ([B.] algoritergicola) APA-1T were 80.1% and 78.5–80% with other members of the “Algorimicrobium” clade. The strain KMM 8389ᵀ showed the ANI values of 77.4–77.9% with the type species B. paragorgiae and other members of the genus Bizionia. The dDDH values (formula d4) between strain KMM 8389ᵀ and closely related strains were below 26.7%, which was found for “A. algoritergicola”. These values were significantly below the recommended ANI and dDDH thresholds for species, which are 95–96% and 70%, respectively. The AAI values between KMM 8389ᵀ and the representatives of the “Algorimicrobium” clade ranged from 77.1% (“A. sediminis” KCTC 42587T) to 81% (“A. algoritergicola” APA-1T), while with type species B. paragorgiae and other members of the genus Bizionia they ranged from 69.5% (B. saleffrena HFDT) to 72.8% ([B.] arctica CGMCC 1.12751T).
To gain an understanding of the phylogenomic relationships within and between the genera Bizionia and “Algorimicrobium”, genomes of type strains of related genera Formosa, Xanthomarina, and Hanstruepera were additionally selected (Figure 2). The genomic tree based on the 400 conserved proteins [44] clearly exhibited the polyphyletic nature of the genus Bizionia, as did the 16S rRNA gene tree in Figure 1. The phylogenomic tree demonstrated 100% branch support for the Bizionia and “Algorimicrobium” clades as separate genera. Furthermore, [B.] arctica as well as Formosa maritima should be transferred to the genus Xanthomarina. The intra-genus AAI values for “Algorimicrobium” and Hanstruepera were 77.8–88.4 and 80.4–92.2%, respectively, while the inter-genus AAI values between them were 74.0–76.4%, which is slightly lower than the inter-species AAI values observed for each genus.
These results confirm the phylogenetic heterogeneity of Bizionia and the clear separation between the genera “Algorimicrobium” and Hanstruepera. The resulting tree showed that KMM 8389ᵀ forms a distinct species-level lineage (Figure 2).
Thus, the phylogenetic analysis based on the OGRIs and the phylogenetic trees clearly supported KMM 8389T as a novel species of the genus “Algorimicrobium” in the family Flavobacteriaceae.

3.2. Genomic Characteristics and Pan-Genome Analysis

The complete de novo assembled genome of KMM 8389T is a single circular chromosome measuring 3,082,442 bps (Figure 3). The genome G + C content was 33.5%. Annotation through NCBI PGAP [42] identified a total of 2901 genes, comprising 2702 protein-coding sequences, 42 tRNA genes, and 12 rRNA genes arranged in four rrn operons. Four 16S rRNA gene sequences retrieved from the genome assembly were 100% identical to those amplified by PCR (PX654852). The chromosomal replication origin, mnmG, was located using Ori-Finder 2022 [43] and validated by the GC skew analysis (Figure 3, Figure S2). The KMM 8389T genome sequencing data correspond to the updated minimal standards used in current bacterial taxonomy [55,56].
Metabolic pathway reconstruction of Bizionia and “Algorimicrobium” members was performed with the Anvi’o pangenomic workflow platform. Analysis revealed a total of 8441 gene clusters comprising 33,288 gene calls (Figure 4a). These gene clusters were categorized into distinct groups as follows: core (1456 gene clusters, 16,256 gene calls), shell (284 gene clusters, 2669 gene calls), cloud (836 gene clusters, 1861 gene calls), Bizionia shell (1032 gene clusters, 3300 gene calls), “Algorimicrobium” shell (974 gene clusters, 5343 gene calls), and singletons (3859 gene clusters, 3859 gene calls), which potentially included a part of gene clusters from [B.] arctica shell and cloud. Additionally, reconstruction conducted only for genomes of “Algorimicrobium” (Figure 4b) showed a total of 5974 gene clusters comprising 20,841 gene calls with core (1686 gene clusters, 11,978 gene calls), shell (724 gene clusters, 3810 gene calls), cloud (1011 gene clusters, 2500 gene calls), and singletons (2553 gene clusters, 2553 gene calls).

3.3. In Silico Analysis of Hydrolytic and Biosynthetic Potentials

The genomic potential for complex carbohydrate degradation was evaluated through mining CAZymes using the dbCAN3 server [49]. The CAZyme proportion in “Algorimicrobium” and Bizionia genera was relatively low compared to other groups within the family Flavobacteriaceae [58] and ranged from 2.25 to 3.33% with the maximum amount predicted in strains KMM 8389T, DSM 23925T, and CGMCC 1.12751T. The most abundant CAZyme family was glycosyltransferase (GT, up to 71), followed by glycoside hydrolase (GH, up to 20) and carbohydrate esterases (CE, up to 5) (Figure 5A). The most common GH among “Algorimicrobium” and Bizionia type strains belonged to the GH23 family, involved in peptidoglycan degradation. The CAZy family analysis also revealed a shared prevalence of family GH13 exclusively in KMM 8389T, DSM 23925T, and CGMCC 1.12751T, which can digest starch, glycogen, and related marine oligo- and polysaccharides [59]. This finding is confirmed by biochemical tests in which KMM 8389T was able to degrade starch. Moreover, GH31 and GH65 genes also predicted only in these genomes together with GH13 are known to be responsible for targeting maltose in algal polysaccharides.
GTs, especially GT2, GT4, and GT51, were among the most represented families. Notably, they were found in all strains, with GT2 and GT4 reaching copy numbers as high as 30, implying a significant role in the biosynthesis of glycan structures such as exopolysaccharides (EPS), cell wall polymers, or glycoproteins [60].
Compared with the GT and GH, the CE, AA (auxiliary activity), and PL (polysaccharide lyase) families presented limited numbers and diversity, with PLs nearly exclusive to KMM 8389T. The presence of five PLs from the families PL 6, 7, 12, and 17 in the genome KMM 8389T indicates specialization toward alginate, corroborating the potential adaptation of this strain to algal substrates and surfaces. Genomes of “Algorimicrobium” and Bizionia strains encoded a narrow set of CEs from CE3, CE4, CE11, and CE14 families. Most of them presumably have deacetylase activity against N-acetylglucosamine-containing compounds. The strain KMM 8389T lacks the AA genes.
The genomic repertoire of BGCs of the Bizionia and “Algorimicrobium” genera was evaluated using the antiSMASH server [51]. Seven types of BGCs were identified and are putatively involved in the production of terpenes, type III polyketide synthases (T3PKSs), arylpolyenes, quinone isoprenoid chain, saccharides, fatty acids, and terpene precursors (Figure 5B). Among these BCGs, fatty acid and saccharide BGCs were the most abundant. A BGC linked to flexirubin production, a hallmark of the family Flavobacteriaceae, was detected in all genome sequences except for [B.] sediminis KCTC 42587T. Furthermore, BGC, associated with carotenoid biosynthesis, was also identified in all studied genomes, albeit with low similarity confidence. These findings are consistent with the observed yellow-orange pigmentation in all bacterial strains.
The Protologger functional analysis [53] identified 2675 coding sequences in the KMM 8389T strain, including 95 transporters, 16 secretion genes, and 601 unique enzymes; no CRISPR arrays were found. The genome has a pathway for the biosynthesis of folate (vitamin B9) from 7,8-dihydrofolate (EC:1.5.1.3). Also, strain KMM 8389T was predicted to be able to produce zeaxanthin, which is consistent with yellow-colored bacterial colonies. Cbb3-type cytochrome C oxidase was predicted in the genome based on the presence of subunits I, II, III, and IV.
The ecological preferences and distribution of the strain were also examined using the Protologger web tool. No MAGs of the proposed novel species were found when screening thousands of MAGs, using Protologger. Analysis of the 16S rRNA genes showed that the gene sequence of KMM 8389T was represented mostly in coral metagenomes (23.60% of samples), followed by marine sediment (19.50% of samples) and marine (12.50%) metagenomes, which is consistent with its isolation source.
The Bacteroidota-specific secretion system IX (T9SS), particularly associated with the gliding motility [61], was detected in “Algorimicrobium” and Bizionia genomes using the MacSyFinder v. 2 [52]. The studied strains contained genes encoding all the necessary components of the canonical T9SS assembly (gldJ, gldK, gldL, gldM, gldN, sprA, sprE, sprT, porQ, porU, and porV). Despite this, gliding motility was not observed for the KMM 8389T cells as well as for other “Algorimicrobium” species. The strain B. paragorgiae DSM 23842T additionally possessed genes of the type VI secretion system (T6SS), which is known as a weapon against Gram-negative bacteria in inter-bacterial competition and in invasion of host cells [62]. Moreover, the strains [B.] argentinensis JUB59T and [B.] echini DSM 23925T contained two sets of genes for the secretion system I (T1SS) widely distributed among Gram-negative bacteria and frequently associated with efflux mechanisms [63].

3.4. Phenotypic Characterization and Chemotaxonomy

The cells of the KMM 8389T bacterium are small, rod-shaped, 0.7 µm wide and 1–2 µm long, and nonmotile. (Figure 6). Novel bacterium could grow in salinities from 0,5 to 8%. It grew well on/in SWM, MA 2216, and MB 2216.
The novel strain KMM 8389T showed a positive reaction to the hydrolysis of gelatin, DNA, and Tweens 20, 40, 80, as well as type strains studied in this work (Table 2). At the same time, there were differences: strains KMM 8389T, [B.] algotergicola CIP 108533T, and [B.] echini KMM 6177T showed a positive reaction to casein hydrolysis and were able to produce H2S, in contrast to [B.] myxarmorum CIP 108535T. In addition, strains KMM 8389T and [B.] echini KMM 6177T were able to hydrolyze starch. The strain KMM 8389T was able to grow at 4–35 °C and pH of 6–8.5. Moreover, [B.] algotergicola CIP 108533T was able to grow at 4–33 °C and pH 6–10. The strain [B.] myxarmorum CIP 108535T was able to grow at 4–30 °C and pH 6–9. [B.] echini KMM 6177T was able to grow at 4–36 °C, 0.5–5% NaCl, and pH 6–8.5.
It should be noted that the strains KMM 8389T, CIP 108533T, CIP 108535T, and KMM 6177T studied in this work had differences in phenotypic properties in comparison with type strains of other species, which are representatives of the genus “Algorimicrobium”, and the type species of the genus Bizionia, B. paragorgiae KMM 6029T.
The major respiratory quinone is MK-6. Predominant fatty acids of strain KMM 8389T were detected to be iso-C15:1 ω10c (16.82%), iso-C15:0 (15.42%), and iso-C15:0 Δ2-OH (11.41%) followed by C15:0 (6.04%), iso-C17:1 ω7c (4.49%), iso-C14:0 (4.40%), anteiso-C15:0 (4.01%), C15:1 ω6c (3.87%), C16:1 ω7c (3.82%), and iso-C16:1 ω6c (3.45%), as shown in Table 3. The other type strains studied in this work showed their own characteristics in the fatty acid profiles. Thus, for [B.] algotergicola CIP 108533T, predominant fatty acids were detected to be C15:0 (17.9%), iso-C15:0 (12.91%), and iso-C15:1 ω10c (11.26%), followed by iso-C15:0 Δ2-OH (6.69%), iso-C14:0 (4.97%), iso-C16:0 (4.57%), anteiso-C15:0 (4.54%), C15:1 ω11c (4.51%), and anteiso-C15:0 Δ3-OH (3.26%). For [B.] myxarmorum CIP 108535T, predominant fatty acids were detected to be anteiso-C15:0 (26.48%) and iso-C15:0 (12.31%), followed by iso-C16:1 ω6c (7.28%), iso-C15:1 ω10c (5.83%), C15:1 ω6c (5.54%), C15:0 (5.25%), iso-C17:1 ω7c (4.41%), C16:1 ω7c (4.40%), and iso-C16:0 (3.58%). Whereas for the type strain [B.] echini KMM 6177T, predominant fatty acids were detected to be iso-C15:0 (21.17%), iso-C15:0 Δ2-OH (17.71%), and iso-C15:1 ω10c (15.58%), followed by C15:0 (9.23%) and iso-C17:1 ω7c (4.47%) (Table 3).
The major polar lipids of the strain KMM 8389T were a phosphatidylethanolamine (PE), a phosphatidylglycerol (PG), two unidentified lipids (L3, L4), and an unidentified aminolipid (AL1); minor amounts of phosphatidylcholine (PC), an unidentified aminolipid (AL2), an unidentified aminophospholipid (APL), and three unidentified lipids (L1, L2, L5) (Figure S3). The polar lipid profiles of the type strains [B.] algoritergicola CIP 108533T and [B.] myxarmorum CIP 108535T differed from that of the new strain KMM 8389T by the presence of an additional unidentified aminolipid (AL2). In the polar lipid profile of the type strain [B.] echini KMM 6177T, the main lipid was also phosphatidylcholine (PC), and in minor quantities, in addition to those described above, two unidentified lipids (L6, L7) were present. At the same time, in the polar lipid profile of the type strain of [B.] myxarmorum CIP 108535T, in addition to those described above, three unidentified lipids (L6, L7, L8) were present in minor quantities.
The DNA G + C content of 33.5% was measured from the genomic sequence of strain KMM 8389T, which is close to the values of 33.4–37 mol% calculated for the members of the genus “Algorimicrobium”. The phylogenetic uniqueness of the strain KMM 8389T is confirmed by phenotypic differences in temperature and salinity ranges, which determine its growth, ability to hydrolyze substrates, and features of the use of carbohydrates. Differential phenotypic and physiological characteristics are indicated in Table 2 and Table S1. Based on the combination of phylogenetic analyses and phenotypic characteristics, it is proposed to classify strain KMM 8389T as a novel species, Algorimicrobium bowmanii.

4. Conclusions

The genomic features of the novel genus and species indicate biotechnological relevance. The presence of polysaccharide-degrading enzymes targeting starch, glycogen, maltose-containing oligosaccharides, and alginate suggests potential for the conversion of algal and other marine polysaccharide substrates. In addition, the abundance of glycosyltransferases points to (exo)polysaccharide production, while the predicted biosynthesis of carotenoids and flexirubin highlights possible applications as sources of natural pigments.
Based on the phylogenomic analysis of all representatives of the genus Bizionia and the new strain KMM 8389T, as well as on the basis of the conclusions described by Marina Gorcia-Lopez et al. [1], below is a description of the new genus Algorimicrobium and its members.
Description of Algorimicrobium, gen. nov. [1]
Al.go.ri.mi.cro’bi.um (L. masc. n. algor/-oris, cold; N.L. neut. n. microbium, a microbe; N.L. neut. n. Algorimicrobium, a cold microbe).
Gram-negative, rod-shaped cells, non-motile by gliding. Strictly aerobic and chemoorganotrophic metabolism. Oxidase and catalase are variable. The major menaquinone is MK-6. The major fatty acids include iso-C15:0, and either anteiso-C15:0, iso-C15:1 G or iso-C17:0 3-OH. The genomic G + C content provided in literature is around 33.4–45 mol%. The type species is Algorimicrobium algoritergicola, comb. nov.
Description of Algorimicrobium algoritergicola, comb. nov. [1]
A. al.go.ri.ter.gi’co.la (L. n. algor, the cold; L. n. tergum, outer covering or surface; L. suff. -cola, the dweller, inhabitant; N.L. neut. n. algoritergicola, the inhabitant of a cold surface or covering).
Basonym: Bizionia algoritergicola Bowman and Nichols 2005
The description is for Bizionia algoritergicola [6]. The type strain is APA-1 = ACAM 1056 = CIP 108533 = KMM 8430.
Description of Algorimicrobium argentinense, comb. nov. [1]
A. ar.gen.ti.nen’se (N.L. neut. adj. argentinense, pertaining to Argentina, the country associated with the scientific station in the vicinity of which the strain was isolated).
Basonym: Bizionia argentinensis Bercovich et al. 2008
The description is as for Bizionia argentinensis [7]. The type strain is JUB59 = CCM-A-29 1259 = DSM 19628.
Description of Algorimicrobium echini, comb. nov. [1]
A. e.chi’ni (L. gen. n. echini, of/from a sea urchin).
Basonym: Bizionia echini Nedashkovskaya et al. 2010
The description is as for Bizionia echini [8]. The type strain is KMM 6177 = DSM 23925 = KCTC 22015.
Description of Algorimicrobium hallyeonense, comb. nov. [1]
A. hal.ly.e.o.nen’se (N.L. neut. adj. hallyeonense, pertaining to HallyeoMarine National Park, the location of Tongyoung, where the type strain was isolated).
Basonym: Bizionia hallyeonensis Yoon et al. 2013
The description is as for Bizionia hallyeonensis [9]. The type strain is T-y7 = CCUG 62110 = KCTC 23881.
Description of Algorimicrobium myxarmorum, comb. nov. [1]
A. myx.ar.mo’rum (Gr. n. myxa, slime; L. gen. pl. n. armorum, defensive armor; N.L. gen. pl. n. myxarmorum, f armor slime, i.e., of the slime on the carapace of a crustacean host).
Basonym: Bizionia myxarmorum Bowman and Nichols 2005
The description is for Bizionia myxarmorum [6]. The type strain is ADA-4 = ACAM 1058 = CIP 108535 = KMM 8431.
Description of Algorimicrobium psychrotolerans, comb. nov. [1]
A. psy.chro.to’le.rans (Gr. adj. psychros, cold; L. part. adj. tolerans, tolerating; N.L. part. adj. psychrotolerans, tolerating cold temperature).
Basonym: Bizionia psychrotolerans Song et al. 2015
The description is as for Bizionia psychrotolerans [10]. The type strain is PB-M7= JCM 19924 = KCCM 43042.
Description of Algorimicrobium sediminis, comb. nov. [1]
A. se.di’mi.nis (L. gen. n. sediminis, of sediment).
Basonym: Bizionia sediminis Zhang et al. 2017
The description is as for Bizionia sediminis [11]. The type strain is P131 = KCTC 42587 = MCCC 1H00124.
Description of Algorimicrobium bowmanii sp. nov.
Algorimicrobium bowmanii (bow.ma’ni.i. N.L. gen. masc. n. bowmanii, of Bowman, in honour of the microbiologist John P. Bowman, who has made important contributions to our knowledge of the diversity of bacteria of the family Flavobacteriaceae).
Yellow-pigmented, rod- or ovoid-shaped cells, 0.7 μm in diameter and 1.8–1.4 μm in length, and encapsulated and nonmotile. Growth on/in MA 2216, MB 2216, SWM. Growth occurs in 0.5–8% NaCl (optimal is 0.5–3%), and at 4–35 °C (optimal is 25–28 °C). The pH range for growth is 6.0–8.5 with an optimum of 7.0–8.0. Oxidase and catalase activities are present. Positive for hydrolysis of gelatin, casein, starch, DNA, Tweens 20, 40, 80, and H2S production, negative for hydrolysis of the L-tyrosine and nitrate reduction in conventional tests.
According to the API 20E test, it was positive for gelatin hydrolysis and negative for β-galactosidase, arginine dihydrolase, lysine decarboxylase, ornithine decarboxylase, citrate utilization, H2S, and urease production under anaerobic conditions, tryptophane deaminase, indole production, acetoin production (Voges–Proskauer reaction), and oxidation of D-glucose, D-mannitol, inositol, D-sorbitol, L-rhamnose, D-sucrose, D-melibiose, amygdalin, and L-arabinose.
Susceptible to (content per disc): ofloxacin (5 µg), rifampicin (5 µg), streptomycin (30 µg), cephalexin (30 µg); ampicillin (10 µg), benzylpenicillin (10 U), vancomycin (30 µg), carbenicillin (100 µg), lincomycin (15 µg), chloramphenicol (30 µg), erythromycin (15 µg); and oleandomycin (15 µg), resistant to: gentamicin (10 µg), neomycin (30 µg), kanamycin (30 µg), nalidixic acid (30 µg), oxacillin (10 µg), cephazolin (30 µg), tetracycline (30 µg), polymyxin B (300 U), doxycycline (10 µg). The DNA GC content of 61.4–61.5% is calculated from the genome sequence. The major respiratory quinone is MK-6. Major fatty acids are iso-C15:1 ω10c (16.82%), iso-C15:0 (15.42%), and iso-C15:0 Δ2-OH (11.41%). The polar lipids included a phosphatidylethanolamine, a phosphatidylglycerol, five unidentified lipids, two unidentified aminolipids, a phosphatidylcholine, and an unidentified aminophospholipid.
The DDBJ/GenBank accession number for the 16S rRNA gene sequence of strain KMM 8389T is PX654852.
The GenBank accession number for the whole-genome sequence of strain KMM 8389T is JBSTRT000000000.
The type strain is 041-53-Ur-6T = KMM 8389T (=KCTC 72011T), isolated from the cavity fluid of the sea urchin Strongylocentrotus intermedius collected in the Vries Strait (45.500000, 148.941668), Iturup Island, Kuril Islands, Sea of Okhotsk, Russia.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/microorganisms14010024/s1, Figure S1: ML/MP 16S rRNA tree showing the position of the new strain KMM 8389T (in bold) among type strains of the genus Bizionia. The ML tree was inferred under the GTR + GAMMA model. The numbers (ML/MP) show bootstrap values greater than 60% measured with 1000 replicates. The bar shows 0.006 substitutions per nucleotide position; Figure S2: Z-curve figure. The red, green, blue, and yellow line graphs indicate AT (AT-skew), GC (GC-skew), RY (purine/pyrimidine), and MK (amino/keto) disparity. The purple vertical lines indicate the DnaA box cluster. The vertical red, dark blue, and blue dotted lines indicate the locations of indicator genes, replication origins, and terminus, respectively; Figure S3: Two-dimensional thin-layer chromatograms of polar lipids of strains: (a) KMM 8389T; (b) [B.] algoritergicola CIP 108533T; (c) [B.] myxarmorum CIP 108535T; (d) [B.] echini KMM 6177T. Abbreviations: PE, phosphatidylethanoamine; PG, phosphatidylglycerol; PC, phosphatidylcholine; APL, unidentified aminophospholipid; AL1, AL2, unidentified aminolipids; L1-L8, unidentified lipids.; Table S1: Differential physiological characteristics of strains KMM 8389T and the most closely related bacteria. Strains: KMM 8389T; [B.] algoritergicola CIP 108533T, [B.] myxarmorum CIP 108535T; [B.] echini KMM 6177T (data were obtained from the present study).

Author Contributions

Investigation, V.K., E.B., N.O., P.V., S.B., V.E., N.A., K.K., and M.I.; Methodology, V.K., N.O., E.B., N.A., P.V., and K.K.; Project administration, O.N. and M.I.; Resources, V.K., O.N., and M.I.; Software, V.E., N.O., E.B., S.B., and M.I.; Writing—original draft, V.K., E.B., S.B., and M.I.; Writing—review and editing, V.K., O.N., and M.I. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by a grant from the Ministry of Science and Higher Education, Russian Federation, Contract No. 075-15-2025-467.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The type strain of the species is strain 041-53-Ur-6T = KMM 8389T (= KCTC 72011T). Isolated from the cavity fluid of the sea urchin Strongylocentrotus intermedius from the Sea of Okhotsk. The DDBJ/ENA/GenBank accession numbers for the 16S rRNA gene and the whole-genome sequences of strain KMM 8389T are PX654852 and JBSTRT000000000.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. García-López, M.; Meier-Kolthoff, J.P.; Tindall, B.J.; Gronow, S.; Woyke, T.; Kyrpides, N.C.; Hahnke, R.L.; Göker, M. Analysis of 1000 Type-Strain Genomes Improves Taxonomic Classification of Bacteroidetes. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 2083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Nedashkovskaya, O.I.; Kim, S.B.; Lysenko, A.M.; Frolova, G.M.; Mikhailov, V.V.; Bae, K.S. Bizionia paragorgiae gen. nov., sp. nov., a novel member of the family Flavobacteriaceae isolated from the soft coral Paragorgia arborea. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2005, 55, 375–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Li, H.; Zhang, X.Y.; Liu, C.; Liu, A.; Qin, Q.L.; Su, H.N.; Shi, M.; Zhou, B.C.; Chen, X.L.; Zhang, Y.Z.; et al. Bizionia arctica sp. nov., isolated from Arctic fjord seawater, and emended description of the genus Bizionia. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2015, 65, 2925–2930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Kim, Y.O.; Park, I.S.; Park, S.; Nam, B.H.; Kim, D.G.; Choi, S.G.; Bae, J.W.; Yoon, J.H. Bizionia berychis sp. nov., isolated from intestinal tract of a splendid alfonsino (Beryx splendens). Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2018, 68, 1227–1232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Kim, H.S.; Hyun, D.W.; Kim, P.S.; Lee, J.Y.; Shin, N.R.; Yun, J.H.; Whon, T.W.; Kim, M.S.; Jung, M.J.; Bae, J.W. Bizionia fulviae sp. nov., isolated from the gut of an egg cockle, Fulvia mutica. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2015, 65, 3066–3072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Bowman, J.P.; Nichols, D.S. Novel members of the family Flavobacteriaceae from Antarctic maritime habitats including Subsaximicrobium wynnwilliamsii gen. nov., sp. nov., Subsaximicrobium saxinquilinus sp. nov., Subsaxibacter broadyi gen. nov., sp. nov., Lacinutrix copepodicola gen. nov., sp. nov., and novel species of the genera Bizionia, Gelidibacter and Gillisia. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2005, 55, 1471–1486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Bercovich, A.; Vazquez, S.C.; Yankilevich, P.; Coria, S.H.; Foti, M.; Hernández, E.; Vidal, A.; Ruberto, L.; Melo, C.; Marenssi, S.; et al. Bizionia argentinensis JUB59T sp. nov., isolated from surface marine water in Antarctica. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2008, 58, 2363–2367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Nedashkovskaya, O.I.; Vancanneyt, M.; Kim, S.B. Bizionia echini sp. nov., isolated from a sea urchin. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2010, 60, 928–931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  9. Yoon, J.H.; Kang, C.H.; Jung, Y.T.; Kang, S.J. Bizionia hallyeonensis sp. nov., isolated from seawater in an oyster farm. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2013, 63, 685–690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Song, E.J.; Lee, M.H.; Seo, M.J.; Yim, K.J.; Hyun, D.W.; Bae, J.W.; Park, S.L.; Roh, S.W.; Nam, Y.D. Bizionia psychrotolerans sp. nov., a psychrophilic bacterium isolated from the intestine of a sea cucumber (Apostichopus japonicus). Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 2014, 106, 837–844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Zhang, H.; Shi, M.J.; Xia, H.F.; Chen, G.J.; Du, Z.J. Bizionia sediminis sp. nov., isolated from coastal sediment. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2017, 67, 2263–2267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Smibert, R.M.; Krieg, N.R. Phenotypic characterization. In Methods for General and Molecular Bacteriology; Gerhardt, P., Murray, R.G.E., Eds.; American Society for Microbiology: Washington, DC, USA, 1994; pp. 607–655. [Google Scholar]
  13. Bowman, J.P. Description of Cellulophaga algicola sp. nov., isolated from the surface of Antarctic algae, and reclassification of Cytophaga uliginosa (ZoBell and Upham 1944) Reichenbach 1989 as Cellulophaga uliginosa comb. nov. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2000, 50, 1861–1868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Pujalte, M.J.; Lucena, T.; Rodrigo-Torres, L.; Arahal, D.R. Comparative genomics of Thalassobius including the description of Thalassobius activus sp. nov., and Thalassobius autumnalis sp. nov. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 8, 2645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Liu, Y.; Liu, L.Z.; Liu, H.C.; Zhou, Y.G.; Qi, F.J.; Liu, Z.P. Wenyingzhuangia marina gen. nov., sp. nov., a member of the family Flavobacteriaceae isolated from a recirculating mariculture system. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2014, 64, 469–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Bligh, E.G.; Dyer, W.J. A rapid method of total lipid extraction and purification. J. Biochem. Physiol. 1959, 37, 911–917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Collins, M.D.; Shah, H.N. Fatty acid, menaquinone and polar lipid composition of Rothia dentosacariosa. Arch. Microbiol. 1984, 137, 247–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Stahl, E. Thin Layer Chromatography (A Laboratory Handbook); Springer: New York, NY, USA, 1969. [Google Scholar]
  19. Vaskovsky, V.E.; Kostetsky, E.Y. Modified spray for the detection of phospholipids on thin-layer chromatograms. J. Lipid Res. 1968, 9, 396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Hiraishi, A.; Ueda, Y.; Ishihara, J.; Mori, T. Comparative lipoquinone analysis of influent sewage and activated sludge by high-performance liquid chromatography and photodiode array detection. J. Gen. Appl. Microbiol. 1996, 42, 457–459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Sasser, M. Identification of Bacteria by Gas Chromatography of Cellular Fatty Acids; Technical Note #101; MIDI: Newark, DE, USA, 1990. [Google Scholar]
  22. Romanenko, L.; Bystritskaya, E.; Savicheva, Y.; Eremeev, V.; Otstavnykh, N.; Kurilenko, V.; Velansky, P.; Isaeva, M. Description and Whole-Genome Sequencing of Mariniflexile litorale sp. nov., Isolated from the Shallow Sediments of the Sea of Japan. Microorganisms 2024, 12, 1413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Yoon, S.H.; Ha, S.M.; Kwon, S.; Lim, J.; Kim, Y.; Seo, H.; Chun, J. Introducing EzBioCloud: A taxonomically united database of 16S rRNA gene sequences and whole-genome assemblies. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2017, 67, 1613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Meier-Kolthoff, J.P.; Carbasse, J.S.; Peinado-Olarte, R.L.; Göker, M. TYGS and LPSN: A database tandem for fast and reliable genome-based classification and nomenclature of prokaryotes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021, 7, D801–D807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Meier-Kolthoff, J.P.; Hahnke, R.L.; Petersen, J.; Scheuner, C.; Michael, V.; Fiebig, A.; Rohde, C.; Rohde, M.; Fartmann, B.; Goodwin, L.A.; et al. Complete genome sequence of DSM 30083T, the type strain (U5/41T) of Escherichia coli, and a proposal for delineating subspecies in microbial taxonomy. Stand. Genomic. Sci. 2014, 8, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Stamatakis, A. RAxML version 8: A tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics 2014, 30, 1312–1313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Goloboff, P.A.; Farris, J.S.; Nixon, K.C. TNT, a free program for phylogenetic analysis. Cladistics 2008, 24, 774–786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Bolger, A.M.; Lohse, M.; Usadel, B. Trimmomatic: A flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 2014, 30, 2114–2120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. De Coster, W.; Rademakers, R. NanoPack2: Population-scale evaluation of long-read sequencing data. Bioinformatics 2023, 39, btad311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Wick, R.R.; Howden, B.P.; Stinear, T.P. Autocycler: Long-read consensus assembly for bacterial genomes. Bioinformatics 2025, 41, btaf474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Kolmogorov, M.; Yuan, J.; Lin, Y.; Pevzner, P.A. Assembly of long, error-prone reads using repeat graphs. Nat. Biotechnol. 2019, 37, 540–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Koren, S.; Walenz, B.P.; Berlin, K.; Miller, J.R.; Phillippy, A.M. Canu: Scalable and accurate long-read assembly via adaptive k-mer weighting and repeat separation. Genome Res. 2017, 27, 722–736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Li, H. Minimap and miniasm: Fast mapping and de novo assembly for noisy long sequences. Bioinformatics 2016, 32, 2103–2110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Hu, J.; Wang, Z.; Sun, Z.; Hu, B.; Ayoola, A.O.; Liang, F.; Li, J.; Sandoval, J.R.; Cooper, D.N.; Ye, K.; et al. NextDenovo: An efficient error correction and accurate assembly tool for noisy long reads. Genome Biology 2024, 25, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Bouras, G.; Sheppard, A.E.; Mallawaarachchi, V.; Vreugde, S. Plassembler: An automated bacterial plasmid assembly tool. Bioinformatics 2023, 39, btad409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Vaser, R.; Šikić, M. Time- and memory-efficient genome assebly with Raven. Nat. Comput. Sci. 2021, 1, 332–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Wick, R.R.; Judd, L.M.; Gorrie, C.L.; Holt, K.E. Unicycler: Resolving bacterial genome assemblies from short and long sequencing reads. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2017, 13, e1005595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Walker, B.J.; Abeel, T.; Shea, T.; Priest, M.; Abouelliel, A.; Sakthikumar, S.; Cuomo, C.A.; Zeng, Q.; Wortman, J.; Young, S.K.; et al. Pilon: An Integrated Tool for Comprehensive Microbial Variant Detection and Genome Assembly Improvement. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e112963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Danecek, P.; Bonfield, J.K.; Liddle, J.; Marshall, J.; Ohan, V.; Pollard, M.O.; Whitwham, A.; Keane, T.; McCarthy, S.A.; Davies, R.M.; et al. Twelve years of SAMtools and BCFtools. GigaScience 2021, 10, giab008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Parks, D.H.; Imelfort, M.; Skennerton, C.T.; Hugenholtz, P.; Tyson, G.W. CheckM: Assessing the quality of microbial genomes recovered from isolates, single cells, and metagenomes. Genome Res. 2015, 25, 1043–1055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Aziz, R.K.; Bartels, D.; Best, A.A.; DeJongh, M.; Disz, T.; Edwards, R.A.; Formsma, K.; Gerdes, S.; Glass, E.M.; Kubal, M.; et al. The RAST Server: Rapid annotations using subsystems technology. BMC Genom. 2008, 9, 75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Tatusova, T.; DiCuccio, M.; Badretdin, A.; Chetvernin, V.; Nawrocki, E.P.; Zaslavsky, L.; Lomsadze, A.; Pruitt, K.D.; Borodovsky, M.; Ostell, J. NCBI prokaryotic genome annotation pipeline. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016, 44, 6614–6624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Dong, M.-J.; Luo, H.; Gao, F. Ori-Finder 2022: A Comprehensive Web Server for Prediction and Analysis of Bacterial Replication Origins. Genom. Proteom. Bioinform. 2022, 44, 1207–1213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Asnicar, F.; Thomas, A.M.; Beghini, F.; Mengoni, C.; Manara, S.; Manghi, P.; Zhu, Q.; Bolzan, M.; Cumbo, F.; May, U.; et al. Precise phylogenetic analysis of microbial isolates and genomes from metagenomes using PhyloPhlAn 3.0. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 2500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Jain, C.; Rodriguez-R, L.M.; Phillippy, A.M.; Konstantinidis, K.T.; Aluru, S. High throughput ANI analysis of 90K prokaryotic genomes reveals clear species boundaries. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 5114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Kim, D.; Park, S.; Chun, J. Introducing EzAAI: A pipeline for high throughput calculations of prokaryotic average amino acid identity. J. Microbiol. 2021, 59, 476–480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Meier-Kolthoff, J.P.; Göker, M. TYGS is an automated high-throughput platform for state-of-the-art genome-based taxonomy. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 2182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Eren, A.M.; Esen, O.C.; Quince, C.; Vineis, J.H.; Morrison, H.G.; Sogin, M.L.; Delmont, T.O. Anvi’o: An advanced analysis and visualization platform for ‘omics data. PeerJ 2015, 3, e1319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Zheng, J.; Ge, Q.; Yan, Y.; Zhang, X.; Huang, L.; Yin, Y. dbCAN3: Automated carbohydrate-active enzyme and substrate annotation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2023, 51, W115–W121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Ausland, C.; Zheng, J.; Yi, H.; Yang, B.; Li, T.; Feng, X.; Zheng, B.; Yin, Y. dbCAN-PUL: A database of experimentally characterized CAZyme gene clusters and their substrates. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021, 49, D523–D528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Blin, K.; Shaw, S.; Vader, L.; Szenei, J.; Reitz, Z.L.; Augustijn, H.E.; Cediel-Becerra, J.D.D.; de Crécy-Lagard, V.; Koetsier, R.A.; Williams, S.E.; et al. antiSMASH 8.0: Extended gene cluster detection capabilities and analyses of chemistry, enzymology, and regulation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2025, 53, W32–W38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Neron, B.; Denise, R.; Coluzzi, C.; Touchon, M.; Rocha, E.P.; Abby, S.S. MacSyFinder v2: Improved modelling and search engine to identify molecular systems in genomes. Peer Community J. 2023, 3, e28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Hitch, T.C.A.; Riedel, T.; Oren, A.; Overmann, J.; Lawley, T.D.; Clavel, T. Automated Analysis of Genomic Sequences Facilitates High-Throughput and Comprehensive Description of Bacteria. ISME Commun. 2021, 1, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Hameed, A.; Shahina, M.; Lai, W.-A.; Lin, S.-Y.; Liu, Y.-C.; Hsu, Y.-H.; Young, C.-C. Hanstruepera neustonica gen. nov., sp. nov., a zeaxanthin-producing member of the family Flavobacteriaceae isolated from estuarine water, and emendation of Sediminibacter furfurosus Khan et al. 2007 emend. Kwon et al. 2014, Mangrovimonas yunxiaonensis Li et al. 2013, Antarcticimonas flava Yang et al. 2009 and Hoppeia youngheungensis Kwon et al. 2014. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2015, 65, 336–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Chun, J.; Oren, A.; Ventosa, A.; Christensen, H.; Arahal, D.R.; Da Costa, M.S.; Rooney, A.P.; Yi, H.; Xu, X.W.; De Meyer, S.; et al. Proposed minimal standards for the use of genome data for the taxonomy of prokaryotes. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2018, 68, 461–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Riesco, R.; Trujillo, M.E. Update on the proposed minimal standards for the use of genome data for the taxonomy of prokaryotes. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2024, 74, 006300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Grant, J.R.; Enns, E.; Marinier, E.; Mandal, A.; Herman, E.K.; Chen, C.; Graham, M.; Van Domselaar, G.; Stothard, P. Proksee: In-Depth Characterization and Visualization of Bacterial Genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2023, 51, W484–W492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Gavriilidou, A.; Gutleben, J.; Versluis, D.; Forgiarini, F.; van Passel, M.W.J.; Ingham, C.J.; Smidt, H.; Sipkema, D. Comparative genomic analysis of Flavobacteriaceae: Insights into carbohydrate metabolism, gliding motility and secondary metabolite biosynthesis. BMC Genomics 2020, 21, 569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Stam, M.R.; Danchin, E.G.J.; Rancurel, C.; Coutinho, P.M.; Henrissat, B. Dividing the large glycoside hydrolase family 13 into subfamilies: Towards improved functional annotations of α-amylase-related proteins. Protein Eng. Des. Sel. 2006, 19, 555–562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Breton, C.; Fournel-Gigleux, S.; Palcic, M.M. Recent structures, evolution and mechanisms of glycosyltransferases. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 2012, 22, 540–549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Lasica, A.M.; Ksiazek, M.; Madej, M.; Potempa, J. The type IX secretion system (T9SS): Highlights and recent insights into its structure and function. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2017, 7, 215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Silverman, J.M.; Brunet, Y.R.; Cascales, E.; Mougous, J.D. Structure and regulation of the type VI secretion system. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 2012, 66, 453–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Spitz, O.; Erenburg, I.N.; Beer, T.; Kanonenberg, K.; Holland, I.B.; Schmitt, L. Type I Secretion Systems-One Mechanism for All? Microbiol. Spectr. 2019, 7, 81–102. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. ML/MP 16S rRNA phylogenetic tree showing the position of the novel strain 041-53-Ur-6T (= KMM 8389ᵀ) (in bold) among type strains of the genus Bizionia. The ML tree was inferred under the GTR + GAMMA model. The numbers (ML/MP) show bootstrap values greater than 60% measured with 1000 replicates. The bar shows 0.007 substitutions per nucleotide position. GenBank/EMBL/DDB accession numbers are given nearby.
Figure 1. ML/MP 16S rRNA phylogenetic tree showing the position of the novel strain 041-53-Ur-6T (= KMM 8389ᵀ) (in bold) among type strains of the genus Bizionia. The ML tree was inferred under the GTR + GAMMA model. The numbers (ML/MP) show bootstrap values greater than 60% measured with 1000 replicates. The bar shows 0.007 substitutions per nucleotide position. GenBank/EMBL/DDB accession numbers are given nearby.
Microorganisms 14 00024 g001
Figure 2. ML genomic tree based on concatenated sequences of 400 conserved proteins showing phylogenetic position of strain KMM 8389T among type strains of Bizionia, “Algorimicrobium”, and related genera Formosa, Xanthomarina, and Hanstruepera. Bootstrap values are based on 100 replicates. Bar—0.05 substitutions per amino acid position. The AAI values of the Bizionia and “Algorimicrobium” clades are shown as a heatmap. Strain Flavobacterium aquatile NBRC 15052T was used as an outgroup.
Figure 2. ML genomic tree based on concatenated sequences of 400 conserved proteins showing phylogenetic position of strain KMM 8389T among type strains of Bizionia, “Algorimicrobium”, and related genera Formosa, Xanthomarina, and Hanstruepera. Bootstrap values are based on 100 replicates. Bar—0.05 substitutions per amino acid position. The AAI values of the Bizionia and “Algorimicrobium” clades are shown as a heatmap. Strain Flavobacterium aquatile NBRC 15052T was used as an outgroup.
Microorganisms 14 00024 g002
Figure 3. Chromosome map of KMM 8389T created using the Proksee server [57]. The scales are shown on the inside circles in kilobases (Kbp). The figure also shows rrn operons (light blue label) and oriC (mnmG) (violet).
Figure 3. Chromosome map of KMM 8389T created using the Proksee server [57]. The scales are shown on the inside circles in kilobases (Kbp). The figure also shows rrn operons (light blue label) and oriC (mnmG) (violet).
Microorganisms 14 00024 g003
Figure 4. The pan-genome of members of Bizionia (a) and “Algorimicrobium” (b) genera generated with anvi’o [48]. Circle bars represent the presence/absence of pan-genomic clusters in each genome. The heatmap in the upper right corner shows pairwise values of ANI and AAI. The strain KMM 8389T is colored in red, other species for “Algorimicrobium” in dark red, [B.] arctica colored in light blue, members of Bizionia in blue. Other information included in the figure comprises the COG20 Function and KOfam modules.
Figure 4. The pan-genome of members of Bizionia (a) and “Algorimicrobium” (b) genera generated with anvi’o [48]. Circle bars represent the presence/absence of pan-genomic clusters in each genome. The heatmap in the upper right corner shows pairwise values of ANI and AAI. The strain KMM 8389T is colored in red, other species for “Algorimicrobium” in dark red, [B.] arctica colored in light blue, members of Bizionia in blue. Other information included in the figure comprises the COG20 Function and KOfam modules.
Microorganisms 14 00024 g004
Figure 5. The distribution of CAZymes, PULs, biosynthetic, and secretion system gene clusters in KMM 8389T, and type strains of “Algorimicrobium” and Bizionia genera: (A) Heatmap of the CAZyme family abundance. (B) Heatmap of the PULs and biosynthetic gene clusters. (C) Heatmap of the secretion system gene clusters.
Figure 5. The distribution of CAZymes, PULs, biosynthetic, and secretion system gene clusters in KMM 8389T, and type strains of “Algorimicrobium” and Bizionia genera: (A) Heatmap of the CAZyme family abundance. (B) Heatmap of the PULs and biosynthetic gene clusters. (C) Heatmap of the secretion system gene clusters.
Microorganisms 14 00024 g005
Figure 6. Transmission electron micrographs of strain KMM 8389T. Bar—1 µm.
Figure 6. Transmission electron micrographs of strain KMM 8389T. Bar—1 µm.
Microorganisms 14 00024 g006
Table 1. Genomic features of new strain KMM 8389T and type strains of the genera Bizionia and “Algorimicrobium”.
Table 1. Genomic features of new strain KMM 8389T and type strains of the genera Bizionia and “Algorimicrobium”.
Feature1234567891011
Assembly levelChromosomeScaffoldScaffoldContigContigContigScaffoldContigContigScaffoldContig
Genome size (Mb)3.03.33.33.53.43.32.93.33.43.13.9
Number of contigs1313029197036671184522
G + C Content (mol%)33.533.534.534343437353535.533
N50 (Kb)-446.7565.1679.82000112.3326.4217.1147.8180.61100
L5012221926882
Coverage (x)3154746521920034158201220436340
Total genes29013057300332893103304126232965309429003499
Protein-coding genes27022990294632293034297225612895301828383439
rRNAs (5S/16S/23S)4/4/54/3/41/1/11/1/12/2/21/1/12/1/12/1/11/1/23/1/23/0/0
tRNA4240363638353637373538
checkM completeness (%)100.099.6899.6899.6899.6899.0299.68100.00100.00100.0099.68
checkM contamination (%)0.1100.160.320.160.000.000.000.000.000.32
WGS project-FOVN01JBHSLA01VSKL01VSKK01AFXZ01JBHULS01VSKM01VSKN01FNQK01BMFQ01
Genome assembly nameJBSTRT000000000IMG-taxon 2622736504ASM4265738v1ASM808616v1ASM808620v1BizArg_
1.0
ASM4268458v1ASM808617v1ASM808618v1IMG-taxon 2622736593ASM1463891v1
Strains: 1, KMM 8389T; 2, [B.] echini DSM 23925T; 3, [B.] hallyeonensis CCUG 62110T; 4, [B.] algoritergicola APA-1T; 5, [B.] myxarmorum ADA-4T; 6, [B.] argentinensis JUB59T; 7, [B.] sediminis KCTC 42587T; 8, B. saleffrena HFDT; 9, B. gelidisalsuginis IC164T; 10, B. paragorgiae DSM 23842T; 11, [B.] arctica CGMCC 1.12751T.
Table 2. Differential characteristics of strain KMM 8389T and type strains of “Algorimicrobium” and Bizionia.
Table 2. Differential characteristics of strain KMM 8389T and type strains of “Algorimicrobium” and Bizionia.
Feature123456789
Growth at/in:
2 °CNDNDNDND+NDNDNDND
4 °C+++++++++
10 °C+++++++++
28 °C+++++++++
30 °C++++++++
33 °C++++++
35 °C+++++
36 °C+++
45 °C+
0% NaCl++
0.5% NaCl++++++
1% NaCl++++++++
2% NaCl+++++++++
3% NaCl+++++++++
5% NaCl+++++++++
6% NaCl++++++++
8% NaCl++++++
9% NaCl++
10% NaCl+
pH 5.5ND++
pH 6++++ND+++
pH 8++++ND+++
pH 8.5++++NDND++
pH 9++NDND++
pH 10+NDND
Oxidase++++++++
Catalase+++++++
Gelatin hydrolysis+++++++++
Tyrosine hydrolysis+++NDND
DNA hydrolysis++++NDNDND
Starch hydrolysis++
Casein hydrolysis++++++ND+
Tweens 20++++ND+++
Tweens 40++++ND++++
Tweens 80+++++++
H2S production+++ND+
Nitrate reduction
Strains: 1, KMM 8389T; 2, [B.] algoritergicola CIP 108533T; 3, [B.] myxarmorum CIP 108535T; 4, [B.] echini KMM 6177T. The data were obtained in this work. 5, [B.] argentinensis JUB59T [7]; 6, [B.] hallyeonensis KCTC 23881T [9]; 7, [B.] psychrotolerans KCCM 43042T [10]; 8, [B.] sediminis KCTC 42587T [11], 9, B. paragorgiae KMM 6029T [2]. Symbols: (+)—positive, (−)—negative, ND—no data.
Table 3. Cellular fatty acid composition (% of the total fatty acids) of strains KMM 8389T and type strains of “Algorimicrobium” and Bizionia.
Table 3. Cellular fatty acid composition (% of the total fatty acids) of strains KMM 8389T and type strains of “Algorimicrobium” and Bizionia.
Fatty Acid123456789
C14:1 ω10c0.801.030.460.20
iso-C14:04.404.794.011.402.01.31.5
iso-C15:1 ω10c16.8211.265.8315.5818.114.610.8
anteiso-C15:1 ω11c1.811.483.180.46 1.7<1
iso-C15:015.4212.9112.3121.1717.313.822.240,713.2
anteiso-C15:04.014.5426.481.3414.0.2.24.8 12.3
C15:1 ω11c2.924.510.851.77
C15:1 ω6c3.871.705.542.083.01.21.1
C15:06.0417.905.259.236.05.4
iso-C16:1 ω6c3.452.427.281.01 2.82.2 5.4
iso-C16:00.884.573.581.301.12.03.3 5.8
C16:1 ω7c3.822.544.402.12 11.2
iso-C15:0 Δ2-OH11.416.690.0617.71
anteiso-C15:0 Δ2-OH1.251.212.440.63
C16:00.781.340.481.14 0.92.4
iso-C15:0 Δ3-OH1.330.970.701.323.33.84.5
anteiso-C15:0 Δ3-OH1.043.261.091.68
iso-C17:1 ω7c4.491.224.414.47
C17:1 ω8c0.171.170.550.32 0.7<1
C17:1 ω6c0.161.131.150.14 2.81.7
C16:0 Δ2-OH0.752.341.871.33
iso-C16:0 Δ3-OH2.882.841.331.875.26.0 6.8
iso-C17:0 Δ3-OH2.161.010.772.119.211.616.710,0
Strains: 1, KMM 8389T; 2, [B.] algoritergicola CIP 108533T; 3, [B.] myxarmorum CIP 108535T; 4, [B.] echini KMM 6177T. The data were obtained in this work. 5, [B.] argentinensis JUB59T [7]; 6, [B.] hallyeonensis KCTC 23881T [9]; 7, [B.] psychrotolerans KCCM 43042T [10]; 8, [B.] sediminis KCTC 42587T [11], 9, B. paragorgiae KMM 6029T [2].
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kurilenko, V.; Bystritskaya, E.; Otstavnykh, N.; Velansky, P.; Baldaev, S.; Eremeev, V.; Ageenko, N.; Kiselev, K.; Nedashkovskaya, O.; Isaeva, M. Genome-Based Reclassification of [Bizionia] algoritergicola Bowman and Nichols 2005 as Algorimicrobium algoritergicola gen. nov., comb. nov. and description of Algorimicrobium bowmanii sp. nov. Microorganisms 2026, 14, 24. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms14010024

AMA Style

Kurilenko V, Bystritskaya E, Otstavnykh N, Velansky P, Baldaev S, Eremeev V, Ageenko N, Kiselev K, Nedashkovskaya O, Isaeva M. Genome-Based Reclassification of [Bizionia] algoritergicola Bowman and Nichols 2005 as Algorimicrobium algoritergicola gen. nov., comb. nov. and description of Algorimicrobium bowmanii sp. nov. Microorganisms. 2026; 14(1):24. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms14010024

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kurilenko, Valeriya, Evgeniya Bystritskaya, Nadezhda Otstavnykh, Peter Velansky, Sergey Baldaev, Viacheslav Eremeev, Natalya Ageenko, Konstantin Kiselev, Olga Nedashkovskaya, and Marina Isaeva. 2026. "Genome-Based Reclassification of [Bizionia] algoritergicola Bowman and Nichols 2005 as Algorimicrobium algoritergicola gen. nov., comb. nov. and description of Algorimicrobium bowmanii sp. nov." Microorganisms 14, no. 1: 24. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms14010024

APA Style

Kurilenko, V., Bystritskaya, E., Otstavnykh, N., Velansky, P., Baldaev, S., Eremeev, V., Ageenko, N., Kiselev, K., Nedashkovskaya, O., & Isaeva, M. (2026). Genome-Based Reclassification of [Bizionia] algoritergicola Bowman and Nichols 2005 as Algorimicrobium algoritergicola gen. nov., comb. nov. and description of Algorimicrobium bowmanii sp. nov. Microorganisms, 14(1), 24. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms14010024

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop