Next Article in Journal
Characterization of Microbial Diversity in Decayed Wood from a Spanish Forest: An Environmental Source of Industrially Relevant Microorganisms
Next Article in Special Issue
Intronization Signatures in Coding Exons Reveal the Evolutionary Fluidity of Eukaryotic Gene Architecture
Previous Article in Journal
Resistance Is Not Futile: The Role of Quorum Sensing Plasticity in Pseudomonas aeruginosa Infections and Its Link to Intrinsic Mechanisms of Antibiotic Resistance
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Method for Stress Assessment of Endosymbiotic Algae in Paramecium bursaria as a Model System for Endosymbiosis

by
Toshiyuki Takahashi
Department of Chemical Science and Engineering, National Institute of Technology (KOSEN), Miyakonojo College, Miyazaki 885-8567, Japan
Microorganisms 2022, 10(6), 1248; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10061248
Submission received: 30 May 2022 / Revised: 11 June 2022 / Accepted: 14 June 2022 / Published: 18 June 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Paramecium as Modern Model System)

Abstract

:
Endosymbiosis between heterotrophic host and microalga often breaks down because of environmental conditions, such as temperature change and exposure to toxic substances. By the time of the apparent breakdown of endosymbiosis, it is often too late for the endosymbiotic system to recover. In this study, I developed a technique for the stress assessment of endosymbiotic algae using Paramecium bursaria as an endosymbiosis model, after treatment with the herbicide paraquat, an endosymbiotic collapse inducer. Microcapillary flow cytometry was employed to evaluate a large number of cells in an approach that is more rapid than microscopy evaluation. In the assay, red fluorescence of the chlorophyll reflected the number of endosymbionts within the host cell, while yellow fluorescence fluctuated in response to the deteriorating viability of the endosymbiont under stress. Hence, the yellow/red fluorescence intensity ratio can be used as an algal stress index independent of the algal number. An optical evaluation revealed that the viability of the endosymbiotic algae within the host cell decreased after treatment with paraquat and that the remaining endosymbionts were exposed to high stress. The devised assay is a potential environmental monitoring method, applicable not only to P. bursaria but also to multicellular symbiotic units, such as corals.

1. Introduction

Protists from the genus Paramecium (Alveolata, Ciliophora) are used as model organisms in various research fields [1,2,3,4,5,6]. Paramecia are unicellular organisms with thousands of cilia [1,2,3,4].
Within the genus Paramecium, the green ciliate Paramecium bursaria has been used as a model organism for endosymbiosis that has driven the cellular evolution of eukaryotes [7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14]. Numerous endosymbiotic algae, similar to the green alga Chlorella (Trebouxiophyceae, Chlorophyta, and Viridiplantae), establish symbiosis within the paramecium host [15]. The paramecium host cell indirectly utilizes the photosynthetic products that are released by endosymbiotic algae and consequently becomes tolerant to starvation, such as the depletion of bacteria [16,17,18,19]. Therefore, the endosymbionts provide the paramecium host with additional features that support its survival.
Endosymbiotic algae can be artificially removed from the paramecium host by using certain experimental procedures, such as treatments with herbicides, protein synthesis inhibitors or other chemicals, and continuous incubation in darkness [12,17,19,20,21,22]. However, even when the endosymbiotic algae are removed, the host cell continues to live and divides asexually, by cell division, under appropriate nutritional conditions with sufficient bacteria to feed on [17,19]. The alga-free host can also reproduce sexually by conjugation [17,19].
Endosymbiotic relationships between heterotrophic cells and autotrophic microalgae have been observed not only in P. bursaria but also in some multicellular organisms, such as Hydra viridissima [23,24,25], coral [23], anemone, sponge [26,27,28,29,30], and the nudibranch Melibe engeli [31]. The removal of endosymbiotic algae upon exposure to herbicides and certain toxic substances, and the breakdown of endosymbiosis are driven by the differential sensitivity of the host cell and the endosymbiont to these chemicals [21,32]. Therefore, the integrity of an integrative cell consisting of the host cell and the endosymbiont must be evaluated, not only from the standpoint of the cellular activity of the host cell, but also considering the integrity of the endosymbiont. However, while the morphology and movement of the host can be easily observed, the integrity of the endosymbiotic algae within the host cell is difficult to assess. This precludes timely observation of the distress of endosymbiotic algae, e.g., that which is induced by environmental pollution or environmental changes. Coral bleaching events, which lead to the death of the cnidarian host and the collapse of the reef ecosystem are an example consequence of the removal of endosymbiotic dinoflagellate alga (Symbiodinium) from the host cell [33,34,35,36,37,38]. Hence, the development of a technology for monitoring the endosymbiotic state as an integrated unit composed of the host cell and endosymbiont before the final and apparent breakdown of endosymbiosis is urgently needed from the environmental monitoring perspective.
The aim of the current study was to develop a method for evaluating the viability of a symbiotic unit comprising P. bursaria. Although microscope-based methods are used to evaluate host morphology and movement, they cannot be used to quantitatively assess the state of endosymbiotic algae in the host cell. Considering differences in the sensitivity of the endosymbiont and the host to toxic compounds, a method is needed for a rapid and quantitative evaluation of the status of many cells. Accordingly, the method that is developed herein employs microcapillary flow cytometry (FCM), which can be used to analyze relatively large cells, such as P. bursaria [19,39,40]. In addition to the evaluation of the endosymbiotic status of P. bursaria as an integrative cell, i.e., whether the P. bursaria host harbors a sufficient number of endosymbiotic algae to maintain the endosymbiosis, the devised method can be used to quantify the stress level of endosymbiotic algae in the host cells following treatment with a herbicide as an endosymbiotic-collapse inducer. The method could be adapted for environmental monitoring applications to evaluate the endosymbiotic status of different endosymbiotic organisms and to detect the crisis of endosymbiosis.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. P. bursaria Strain and Culture Conditions

P. bursaria syngen I (AS-2, mating type IV) collected from the Ashida Kawa River (Hiroshima prefecture, Japan) was used. The paramecia were cultured in lettuce infusion [20] containing Klebsiella pneumoniae as food under an LD cycle (12 h light/12 h dark) with ca. 1100 lux (ca. 17 μmol·m−2·s−1 as photosynthetic photon flux density [PPFD]) natural white fluorescent light and 23 ± 2 °C. P. bursaria in logarithmic to the stationary phase of growth. The paramecia were then collected and used for subsequent experiments.

2.2. Specimen Preparation and Light Microscopy

The paramecia were harvested and fixed in 5% (v/v) formalin. A bright field image of the prepared specimens was analyzed using a light microscope (Labolux Jr. Series KN-50TC, Kyowa Optical Co. Ltd., Sagamihara, Kanagawa, Japan) that was equipped with a digital camera (AR-D300C, Arms System Co. Ltd., Tokyo, Japan).

2.3. Detection of Intact P. bursaria Using Microcapillary FCM

To detect and evaluate the intact P. bursaria host cells in a test sample, a microcapillary flow cytometer that was equipped with a green laser operating at 532 nm (MuseTM Cell Analyzer, Merck Millipore Corp., Burlington, MA, USA) was used, as described earlier [19,39]. P. bursaria fixed in 5% (v/v) formalin was analyzed at flow rates of 0.59 µL/s. Several optical properties of P. bursaria cells that passed through a rectangular capillary with a 100-µm round bore were analyzed. Forward scatter signals (forward scatter-height intensity) were collected to confirm the cell size. Simultaneously, chlorophyll fluorescence was detected in the red fluorescence channel using a 680/30 nm band-pass filter. In addition to the red fluorescence channel (red fluorescence intensity), a yellow fluorescence channel (576/28 nm band-pass filter) was simultaneously used. To obtain sufficient data, FCM measurements were repeated 3–20 times. Individual signals were extracted from the FCM data for each generated FCS3.0 file using FCSExtract utility ver. 1.02 (Stowers Institute for Medical Research, Kansas City, MO, USA). The data were re-analyzed using standard spreadsheet software (Excel, Microsoft Corp., Redmond, WA, USA). In microcapillary FCM, the intact P. bursaria host cells as target cells pass through a 100-μm-wide capillary for analysis, which allows passage of their paramecia [19,39]. If the P. bursaria host cells are not disrupted during the measurement, information about them is obtained [39]. Conversely, disruption of the host cell prior to analysis allows collection of information on endosymbiotic algae that are released from the crushed host cells [40]. If the FCM data of P. bursaria are expressed in a scatter plot of forward scatter intensity vs. red fluorescence intensity, two distinct populations are detected (R1, representing the intact P. bursaria cells, and R2, representing the endosymbionts that are released from the broken P. bursaria cells) (Figure 1), as described earlier [39].

2.4. Treatment of P. bursaria with Paraquat (PQ) Herbicide

PQ (methyl viologen, C12H14Cl2N2) was used to destabilize the microalgal endosymbiosis with P. bursaria [17,20,32,39,41,42,43]. Prior to the experiment, P. bursaria was cultured in fresh lettuce medium containing K. pneumoniae that was supplemented with 0.1 μg/mL of PQ for 1–7 d under an LD cycle at ca. 1100 lux (ca. 17 μmol·m−2·s−1 as PPFD) natural white fluorescence light and 23 ± 2 °C (initial density: 20 paramecia/mL) [39]. After PQ treatment, the paramecia were collected and fixed in 5% (v/v) formalin. The fixed paramecia were used for microscopic observations and flow cytometric analyses. For FCM analysis, signals in the R 1 region that were derived from the intact host cells were acquired and analyzed as described in Section 2.3. Results from duplicate and triplicate experiments with PQ were used for the FCM analysis.

2.5. FCM Evaluation of the Stress Status of Endosymbiotic Algae in P. bursaria

To evaluate the cellular status of endosymbiotic algae in the P. bursaria host cell, the red and yellow fluorescence intensities were evaluated using signals that were derived from the intact P. bursaria host cells (Figure 1). The stress of endosymbiotic algae was defined as the variation in parameters related to chlorophyll that was detected using FCM when compared to the control condition without herbicide. The fluorescence intensities and scatter plot distribution patterns of PQ-treated and untreated P. bursaria were compared.
To assess the stress status of endosymbiotic algae in host cells in the untreated control and in PQ-treated samples, the yellow/red fluorescence intensity ratios of individual intact P. bursaria host cells were determined. After a statistical analysis of quantiles, such as a sample minimum, lower quartile, median, upper quartile and maximum using Microsoft Excel, a box-and-whisker plot analysis was performed using Microsoft Excel functions.

3. Results

3.1. Effects of the Herbicide PQ on Microalga Endosymbiosis with P. bursaria and Endosymbiosis Characterization Using FCM

3.1.1. Detection of Red Fluorescence Signals from P. bursaria Cells Using FCM

As previously reported [17,20,32,39,40,41,42,43], the PQ exposure of P. bursaria markedly reduced the number of endosymbiotic algae in the host cell within a few days of treatment (Figure 2a). The P. bursaria host cells, treated or not with PQ, were collected and analyzed by microcapillary FMC. Chlorophyll, when excited by an appropriate excitation light, emits red fluorescence. Then, the FCM signals that are derived from the host cells were acquired (Figure 1), based on the red fluorescence intensity of the chlorophyll of the endosymbiotic algae in the host cell. The signal detection rate in the R1 region, representing signals from the intact P. bursaria cells was low in the FCM measurements using unfixed P. bursaria, while the signal detection in the R1 region increased in fixed cells (data not shown). Therefore, the subsequent FCM measurements were performed using fixed P. bursaria cells. As a result of the FCM measurements, the red fluorescence intensity of the P. bursaria host cells decreased depending on the duration of the PQ treatment (Figure 2b). As shown in the microscopic images in Figure 2a, the decrease in red fluorescence intensity was related to a notable reduction in the number of endosymbiotic algae in the individual host cells. However, the FCM red fluorescence intensity information was difficult to interpret beyond the cell appearance in microscopic images.

3.1.2. Detection of Yellow Fluorescence Signals from P. bursaria Cells Using FCM

The number of endosymbiotic algae in each host cell fluctuates not only as a result of cytotoxicity upon certain chemical exposure but also throughout the P. bursaria cell cycle [19,44], and depending on nutrient availability and other factors, such as culture conditions. Hence, the information that is gleaned from changes in the red fluorescence intensity cannot serve as an assessment of the vitality of endosymbiotic algae because it is directly dependent on the number of endosymbiotic algae in the P. bursaria cell (Figure 2). Therefore, in addition to the red fluorescence intensity data, the corresponding yellow fluorescence intensity, reflecting the physiological activity of the endosymbiont, was evaluated in the current study.
Figure 3 shows scatter plots of the red fluorescence intensity and the corresponding yellow fluorescence intensity. The yellow fluorescence of algae is related to chlorophyll integrity [45,46,47,48], while the red fluorescence directly reflects the number of algae and an algal population size [14,49,50,51]. Comparison of the scatter plot pattern of untreated controls and those of cells that were treated with PQ revealed changes after 1 d of PQ treatment (Figure 3a). Furthermore, the plot pattern was clearly different from that for the control condition, depending on the duration of the PQ treatment (Figure 3a–c). Specifically, the yellow fluorescence intensity of the cells that were treated with PQ for 1 d was notably greater than that of the control cells (Figure 3d). However, the increase in yellow fluorescence intensity was not pronounced after 3–7 d of PQ treatment when compared to the yellow fluorescence intensity in cells after 1 d of PQ treatment (data not shown).
A detailed analysis of the scatter plots of red and the corresponding yellow fluorescence intensities revealed different tendencies of plot distribution patterns for the control and PQ-treated samples. Accordingly, the correlation between the red and yellow fluorescence intensities in the control samples was negligible (slop (A) in Figure 3e), while there was a clear correlation between the red and yellow fluorescence intensities in the PQ-treated samples, with the slops determined by the least-squares method (slops (B) to (D) in Figure 3e).

3.2. The Ratio of Yellow Fluorescence Intensity to the Corresponding Red Fluorescence Intensity of P. bursaria as a Stress Index

3.2.1. Fluctuation of the Stress Index throughout the Cell Cycle of P. bursaria Host

Since the correlation between the red and yellow fluorescence intensities depended on the degree of stress that was induced by PQ (Figure 3), the cellular stress status of the endosymbiotic algae in the host cell was next evaluated. Specifically, the ratio of yellow fluorescence intensity to the corresponding red fluorescence intensity was used as a stress index for the endosymbiotic algae in the P. bursaria host. Based on microphotographs (Figure 2a) and the red fluorescence intensity of P. bursaria that was treated with PQ (Figure 2b), the number of endosymbiotic algae in P. bursaria cells was directly correlated with the corresponding red fluorescence intensity of the intact P. bursaria host cell. To compare the cellular stress status of the endosymbiotic algae in P. bursaria under different experimental conditions, regardless of the difference in the number of endosymbiotic algae per host cell, the ratios of yellow fluorescence intensity to the corresponding red intensity that were derived from the individual intact P. bursaria host cells were calculated. To minimize the differences in the number of endosymbiotic algae under the different experimental conditions, the red fluorescence intensity corresponding to the number of endosymbiotic algae was the denominator, and the yellow fluorescence intensity was the numerator. Furthermore, changes in the ratio of yellow fluorescence intensity to the red fluorescence intensity were also examined throughout the cell cycle of P. bursaria host cells in untreated P. bursaria host cells (Figure 4a).
Figure 4 shows the box-and-whisker diagram analysis of the ratios. Figure 4a shows the ratio of yellow fluorescence intensity to red fluorescence intensity of the endosymbiotic algae in P. bursaria without PQ treatment, but in different cell cycle phases of the host cell, thus reflecting changes in cell stress status during the cell cycle of the host cell. Although some variation in the yellow/red fluorescence intensity ratio (a stress indicator of endosymbiotic algae in P. bursaria) during the cell cycle transition of the host cell was apparent, the variation was nearly constant within the error range (Figure 4a).

3.2.2. Evaluation of Stress Index of Endosymbionts in P. bursaria Treated with PQ

The yellow/red fluorescence intensity ratios of the PQ-treated and untreated (control) cells were compared (Figure 4b). The ratio increased even after 1 d of PQ treatment compared with that in the control. Further, the ratio value notably increased with the lengthening of the PQ treatment. As noted in Section 3.2.1, the vertical axis representing the yellow/red fluorescence intensity ratio in the box-and-whisker diagram, but not the yellow or red fluorescence, is independent of the number of endosymbiotic algae in a P. bursaria host cell. Therefore, the yellow/red fluorescence intensity ratio represents the intensity of cellular stress that is experienced by an individual endosymbiont cell. The data indicated that the viability of the endosymbiotic algae deteriorated depending on the duration of the PQ treatment.
Figure 5 presents scatter plots that summarize the yellow/red fluorescence ratio, i.e., the average stress index of an individual endosymbiotic alga (Figure 4b), and the red fluorescence intensity reflecting the number of endosymbionts in each host cell (Figure 2b). While the distribution of the data points for the control conditions is very narrow and constant, the distribution of data points for the PQ treatment conditions differs depending on the duration of the PQ treatment. For example, the data point distribution for 1 d of PQ exposure simultaneously indicates an increase in stress and a slight decrease in the number of endosymbiotic algae, compared to those in the control. Similar to the distribution pattern for the control, the distribution pattern for 1 d of PQ treatment was constant (Figure 5a). However, the plot distribution patterns for the other test conditions (≥3 d of PQ treatment) varied considerably for individual P. bursaria host cells. Although there was some variation in the scatter plots (Figure 5a–a”), the longer the duration of PQ treatment, the lower the number of endosymbiotic algae in each host cell and the greater the stress index of the endosymbiotic algae that remained in each host cell.

4. Discussion

4.1. Characteristics of the Red and Yellow Fluorescence Intensity Signals from P. bursaria Obtained Using FCM

This study focused on developing a method for evaluating the cellular health integrity of P. bursaria that would be superior to the visual inspection method. The new method is based on the evaluation of endosymbiosis using microcapillary FCM. The herbicide PQ was used to destabilize the endosymbiotic relationship between the P. bursaria host and the endosymbiotic algae. The PQ treatment of P. bursaria induced the readily observable destabilization and breakdown of the microalga endosymbiosis with P. bursaria, resulting in a reduction in the number of endosymbionts in the host cell (Figure 2a).
The mechanism of PQ toxicity in relation to photosynthesis is described in Figure 6a. Chlorophyll absorbs light energy in the light reaction of photosynthesis. After excitation, the electron transfer chain is involved in a series of redox reactions. Using electrons that are generated by this electron transfer chain, PQ reduces oxygen molecules, which leads to the production of superoxide as one of the reactive oxygen species [52] (Figure 6a). This induces oxidative stress and cytotoxicity, such as the decrease in the number of endosymbionts in the P. bursaria cell (Figure 2a). The flow cytometer that was used in the current study detected signals that were derived from the endosymbiotic algae in the P. bursaria host cell by focusing on the red fluorescence (Figure 2b) [19,39,40]. The intensity of red fluorescence (Figure 2b) was largely consistent with the changes in the number of endosymbiotic algae that were observed using microscopy (Figure 2a).
As shown in the microscopic images of P. bursaria that was treated with PQ (Figure 2a), the red fluorescence intensity of P. bursaria (Figure 2b) notably decreased depending on the PQ treatment period because of the decrease in the number of endosymbiotic algae in P. bursaria. In addition to the red fluorescence intensity, the flow cytometer that was used in the current study also detected yellow fluorescence signals. The yellow fluorescence intensity is associated with chlorophyll denaturation and other factors [45,46,47,48]. Therefore, the maximum and potential yellow fluorescence intensity is related to the red fluorescence intensity that is emitted by chlorophyll [39,47]. In other words, the decrease in the number of endosymbionts in P. bursaria by the PQ treatment led to a decrease in the intensity of the red fluorescence as the potential source of the yellow fluorescence, leading to the ensuing reduction in the intensity of the yellow fluorescence. However, when the number of endosymbiotic algae in the host cell significantly differed in the reference (control) and the test condition, it was difficult to evaluate the microalgal stress solely on the basis of the yellow fluorescence intensity (Figure 3). This led me to consider the yellow/red fluorescence intensity ratio as a stress index for endosymbionts in P. bursaria host cells.

4.2. Using the Yellow/Red Fluorescence Intensity Ratio as the Stress Index for Endosymbionts in the P. bursaria Host Cell

The yellow/red fluorescence intensity ratio was characterized herein as the stress index of the endosymbiotic algae in the host cell (Figure 4) because of the observed correlation between the red and yellow fluorescence intensities depending on the PQ treatment duration (Figure 3e). To investigate the properties of the yellow/red fluorescence intensity ratio as a stress indicator and to check its validity, changes in the ratio values throughout the cell cycle of P. bursaria host cells without PQ treatment were first evaluated. The yellow/red fluorescence intensity ratio was nearly constant within the error range during the cell cycle transition of the host cells (Figure 4a). In contrast, the yellow/red fluorescence intensity ratio of the P. bursaria host cells that were treated with PQ was greater than that of the control cells (Figure 4b). Further, the ratio notably increased with the increasing duration of PQ treatment (Figure 4b). The ratio represents the degree of average stress per individual endosymbiont because the yellow/red fluorescence intensity ratio is independent of the number of endosymbiotic algae in a P. bursaria cell. The analysis clearly indicated that the PQ treatment of P. bursaria disrupted the endosymbiotic algae, so that the longer the treatment time, the more severe the effect. Hence, the yellow/red fluorescence intensity ratio can be used as an indicator of the vitality of endosymbiotic algae in the P. bursaria cell.
The scatter plots of the yellow/red fluorescence intensity ratio (endosymbiont stress index) vs. the red fluorescence intensity of the P. bursaria cell (the number of endosymbionts in the host cell) provided additional information (Figure 5). The broad plot distribution of the data for the PQ-treated samples suggested that the host cell eliminates endosymbionts upon PQ treatment. In addition, it also shows the existence of a considerable individual variation among the P. bursaria cells in the removal of endosymbionts (Figure 5a’,a”). Regardless of the interpretation, it is clear that the number of endosymbiotic algae in each host cell decreased with the PQ treatment time, and that the endosymbiotic algae that were exposed to digestion in the host cell experienced a high level of stress (Figure 5).

4.3. Utility of the Devised Method for the Visualization of Cellular Stress of Endosymbionts in the P. bursaria Host Cell

P. bursaria is a model organism for endosymbiosis, and the mechanisms for an initial establishment of microalga endosymbiosis with P. bursaria [7,11,13,17,20] and its maintenance are extensively researched [10,19,20,22,39,40,44,53,54,55]. Not all exosymbiotic microalgae, which are the symbiotic algae that are isolated from the host cell and cultured in an artificial culture medium, are able to reestablish endosymbiosis within the host cell. In addition to this, many microalgae that are taken up are simply digested in the host lysosomes [53]. Consequently, a limited number of algal cells succeed in establishing a stable endosymbiosis. This might be related to several factors, such as the cellular status of the microalgae, e.g., the appropriateness of the candidate microalga for endosymbiosis. These symbiosis-related factors are not fully understood. To date, studies of endosymbiosis in P. bursaria remain a simple microscopic confirmation of the establishment or failure of experimental re-symbiosis under a variety of experimental conditions.
Considering the above, it is important to determine whether the status of microalgae establishing a successful re-symbiosis is different from that of algae failing to establish re-symbiosis. The method that is presented in the current study could be used to evaluate the cellular stress status of endosymbiotic algae even when the number of endosymbionts within the host cell is low. Therefore, the method could be used to examine the minute changes in cellular stress status of the endosymbiont during the progression of a complex biochemical process, such as the establishment of endosymbiosis.
Photosynthesis is the most essential process to be carried out by plant and algal cells, and the method that is presented in the current study analyzes chlorophyll-dependent changes in fluorescence that are directly related to photosynthesis. Using chlorophyll fluorescence, measurements of photosynthetic efficiency, such as maximum quantum yield of photosystem II (Fv/Fm) have been attempted in experiments with P. bursaria [56]. The study revealed differences in photosynthetic efficiency between endosymbiotic algae in the host cell and exosymbiotic algae that were grown outside the host cell [56]. However, the measurement of photosynthetic efficiency was the result of the average of the test sample containing several P. bursaria host cells because of the difficulty of single cell measurement due to the cells’ measurement sensitivity. In contrast, the FCM measurements that are used in the current study can access information on a single cell of a P. bursaria host because one signal is derived from one cell in an FCM measurement (Figure 1). This is an advantage of using the FCM method over other fluorescence measurements.
When combined with various fluorescently labeled biochemical probes that are indicative of processes other than photosynthesis, the devised method could be used to precisely track fluctuations in endosymbiosis under different experimental conditions, such as the establishment of endosymbiosis, maintenance of endosymbiosis throughout the cell cycle of the host cell, and its breakdown in response to various environmental stresses.

4.4. Importance of Evaluating a Stress Status of Endosymbionts as an Environmental Monitoring and Chemical Safety Approach, and Its Potential for Future Applications

In addition to its use as a model organism for endosymbiosis, P. bursaria is also used in bioassays because of its high or singular sensitivity to several chemicals [32,57,58,59,60]. Some chemicals, e.g., herbicides, such as PQ, affect endosymbiotic algae as well as the P. bursaria host cell. Changes in the number of endosymbiotic algae in the host cell can be easily assessed visually as the most noticeable change. However, by the time that the number of endosymbiotic algae is reduced, an irreversible breakdown of the endosymbiotic relationship between the host cell and the endosymbiont has already occurred [33,34,35,36,37,38]. Therefore, techniques that can be used to assess the stress status of the endosymbiont within the host cell before the complete breakdown of the endosymbiotic relationship are crucial to environmental monitoring. The method for endosymbiont stress assessment that is presented in the current study could be used to evaluate not only unicellular host organism, such as P. bursaria, but also symbiotic and kleptoplastic units of multicellular organisms, such as corals and sea slugs when applied to tissue fragments or other cell samples. Hence, the devised method could be used as a potential and effective approach for environmental monitoring.

Funding

This research was partly supported by Grants-in-Aid for Exploratory Research from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (KAKENHI Grant Numbers 19K06347, 20K05695 and 22K05839). This research was also partly supported by the Institute for Fermentation, Osaka (Grant Number G-2022-2-029).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Takahashi, T.; Ito, A.; Hasegawa, Y. A New Physiological Experiment for Non-Science Major Students: Arrest and Recovery of Ciliary Motility on Protozoa Paramecium Using Metal Ions. Hiyoshi Rev. Nat. Sci. 2009, 46, 43–55. (In Japanese) [Google Scholar]
  2. Brette, R. Integrative Neuroscience of Paramecium, a “Swimming Neuron”. eNneuro 2021, 8, ENEURO.0018-21.2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Valentine, M.; Van Houten, J. Using Paramecium as a Model for Ciliopathies. Genes 2021, 12, 1493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Bouhouche, K.; Valentine, M.S.; Le Borgne, P.; Lemullois, M.; Yano, J.; Lodh, S.; Nabi, A.; Tassin, A.M.; Van Houten, J.L. Paramecium, a Model to Study Ciliary Beating and Ciliogenesis: Insights from Cutting-Edge Approaches. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2022, 14, 847908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Arnaiz, O.; Sperling, L. Paramecium DB in 2011: New tools and new data for functional and comparative genomics of the model ciliate Paramecium tetraurelia. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011, 39, D632–D636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Matsumoto, S.; Watanabe, K.; Kiyota, H.; Tachibana, M.; Shimizu, T.; Watarai, M. Distinction of Paramecium strains by a combination method of RAPD analysis and multiplex PCR. PLoS ONE 2022, 17, e0265139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Nishihara, N.; Horiike, S.; Takahashi, T.; Kosaka, T.; Shigenaka, Y.; Hosoya, H. Cloning and characterization of endosymbiotic algae isolated from Paramecium bursaria. Protoplasma 1998, 203, 91–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Nishihara, N.; Horiike, S.; Oka, Y.; Takahashi, T.; Kosaka, T.; Hosoya, H. Microtubule-Dependent Movement of Symbiotic Algae and Granules in Paramecium bursaria. Cell Motil. Cytoskeleton 1999, 43, 85–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Gerashchenko, B.I.; Nishihara, N.; Ohara, T.; Tosuji, H.; Kosaka, T.; Hosoya, H. Flow cytometry as a strategy to study the endosymbiosis of algae in Paramecium bursaria. Cytometry 2000, 41, 209–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Kadano, T.; Kawano, T.; Hosoya, H.; Kosaka, T. Flow cytometric studies of the host-regulated cell cycle in algae symbiotic with green paramecium. Protoplasma 2004, 223, 133–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Kodama, Y.; Fujishima, M. Symbiotic Chlorella sp. of the ciliate Paramecium do not prevent acidification and lysosomal fusion of the host digestive vacuoles during infection. Protoplasma 2005, 225, 191–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Summerer, M.; Sonntag, B.; Sommaruga, R. An experimental test of the symbiosis specificity between the ciliate Paramecium bursaria and strains of the unicellular green alga Chlorella. Environ. Microbiol. 2007, 9, 2117–2122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Kodama, Y.; Fujishima, M. Paramecium as a Model Organism for Studies on Primary and Secondary Endosymbioses. In Biocommunication of Ciliates, 1st ed.; Witzany, G., Nowacki, M., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2016; pp. 277–304. [Google Scholar]
  14. Takahashi, T. Applicability of automated cell counter with a chlorophyll detector in routine management of microalgae. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 4967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Hoshina, R.; Kamako, S.; Imamura, N. Phylogenetic Position of Endosymbiotic Green algae in Paramecium bursaria Ehrenberg from Japan. Plant Biol. 2004, 6, 447–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Ziesenisz, E.; Reisser, W.; Wiessner, W. Evidence of de novo synthesis of maltose excreted by the endosymbiotic Chlorella from Paramecium bursaria. Planta 1981, 153, 481–485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Nishihara, N.; Takahashi, T.; Kosaka, T.; Hosoya, H. Characterization of Symbiotic Alagae-free Strains of Paramecium bursaria Produced by the Herbicide Paraquat. J. Protozool. Res. 1996, 6, 60–67. [Google Scholar]
  18. Takahashi, T.; Nagasaki, A. Energy Production Using Microalgae Secreting Carbohydrates. J. Environ. Conserv. Eng. 2011, 40, 662–665. (in Japanese). [Google Scholar]
  19. Takahashi, T. Life cycle analysis of endosymbiotic algae in an endosymbiotic situation with Paramecium bursaria using capillary flow cytometry. Energies 2017, 10, 1413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Hosoya, H.; Kimura, K.; Matsuda, S.; Kitaura, M.; Takahashi, T.; Kosaka, T. Symbiotic Algae-free Strains of the Green Paramecium Paramecium bursaria Produced by Herbicide Paraquat. Zool. Sci. 1995, 12, 807–810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Takahashi, T.; Yoshii, M.; Kawano, T.; Kosaka, T.; Hosoya, H. A New bioassay for the assessment of acrylamide toxicity using a green paramecium. Toxicol. In Vitro 2005, 19, 99–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Kodama, Y.; Fujishima, M. Cycloheximide induces synchronous swelling of perialgal vacuoles enclosing symbiotic Chlorella vulgaris and digestion of the algae in the ciliate Paramecium bursaria. Protist 2008, 159, 483–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Muscatine, L.; Karakashian, S.J.; Karakashian, M.W. Soluble extracellular products of algae symbiotic with a ciliate, a sponge and a mutant Hydra. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 1967, 20, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Fishman, Y.; Zlotkin, E.; Sher, D. Expulsion of Symbiotic Algae during Feeding by the Green Hydra - a Mechanism for Regulating Symbiont Density? PLoS ONE 2008, 3, e2603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Matthias, H.; Frederike, A.-E.; Kathrin, N.; Thomas, C.B. The Hydra viridis/Chlorella symbiosis. Growth and sexual differentiation in polyps without symbionts. Zoology 2003, 106, 101–108. [Google Scholar]
  26. Taylor, D.L. The Nutritional Relationship of Anemonia sulcata (PENNANT) and Its Dinoflagellate Symbiont. J. Cell Sci. 1969, 4, 751–762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Weis, V.M.; Reynolds, W.S.; de Boer, M.D.; Krupp, D.A.A. Host-symbiont specificity during onset of symbiosis between the dinoflagellates Symbiodinium sand planula larvae of the scleractinian coral Fungia scutaria. Coral Reefs 2001, 20, 301–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Rowan, R. Thermal adaptation in reef coral symbionts. Nature 2004, 430, 742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Richier, S.; Sabourault, C.; Courtiade, J.; Zucchini, N.; Allemand, D.; Furla, P. Oxidative stress and apoptotic events during thermal stress in the symbiotic sea anemone, Anemonia viridis. FEBS J. 2006, 273, 4186–4198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Bucher, M.; Wolfowicz, I.; Voss, P.A.; Hambleton, E.A.; Guse, A. Development and Symbiosis Establishment in the Cnidarian Endosymbiosis Model Aiptasia sp. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 19867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Burghardt, I.; Wägele, H. The symbiosis between the ‘solar-powered’ nudibranch Melibe engeli Risbec, 1937 (Dendronotoidea) and Symbiodinium sp. (Dinophyceae). J. Molluscan Stud. 2014, 80, 508–517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Takahashi, T.; Yoshii, M.; Kosaka, T.; Hosoya, H. The Effect of Acrylamide Inducing the Reduction of Nitrobluetetrazolium on the Ciliate and Human Cultured Cells. ITE Lett. Batter. N. Technol. Med. 2005, 6, 50–58. [Google Scholar]
  33. Baker, A.C. Flexibility and Specificity in Coral-Algal Symbiosis: Diversity, Ecology, and Biogeography of Symbiodinium. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 2003, 34, 661–689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Baker, D.M.; Freeman, C.J.; Wong, J.C.Y.; Fogel, M.L.; Knowlton, N. Climate change promotes parasitism in a coral symbiosis. ISME J. 2018, 12, 921–930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Nielsen, D.A.; Petrou, K.; Gates, R.D. Coral bleaching from a single cell perspective. ISME J. 2018, 12, 1558–1567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Rädeckera, N.; Pogoreutza, C.; Gegnera, H.M.; Cárdenasa, A.; Rotha, F.; Bougoureg, J.; Guagliardog, P.; Wildh, C.; Pernicei, M.; Rainai, J.-B.; et al. Heat stress destabilizes symbiotic nutrient cyclingin corals. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2021, 118, e2022653118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Torres, A.F.; Valino, D.A.M.; Ravago-Gotanco, R. Zooxanthellae Diversity and Coral-Symbiont Associations in the Philippine Archipelago: Specificity and Adaptability Across Thermal Gradients. Front. Mar. Sci. 2021, 8, 731023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Sully, S.; Burkepile, D.E.; Donovan, M.K.; Hodgson, G.; van Woesik, R. A global analysis of coral bleaching over the past two decades. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 1264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Takahashi, T. Direct Evaluation of Endosymbiotic Status in Paramecium bursaria Using a Capillary Flow Cytometry. Cytom. Part A 2014, 85, 911–914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Takahashi, T. Simultaneous Evaluation of Life Cycle Dynamics between a Host Paramecium and the Endosymbionts of Paramecium bursaria Using Capillary Flow Cytometry. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 31638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Tanaka, M.; Murata-Hori, M.; Kadono, T.; Yamada, T.; Kawano, T.; Kosaka, T.; Hosoya, H. Complete Elimination of Endosymbiotic Algae from Paramecium bursaria and its Confirmation by Diagnostic PCR. Acta Protozool. 2002, 41, 255–261. [Google Scholar]
  42. Ohkawa, H.; Hashimoto, N.; Furukawa, S.; Kadono, T.; Kawano, T. Forced symbiosis between synechocystis sPCC 6803 and apo-symbiotic Paramecium bursaria as an experimental model for evolutionary emergence of primitive photosynthetic eukaryotes. Plant Signal. Behav. 2011, 6, 773–776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Sørensen, M.E.S.; Wood, A.J.; Cameron, D.D.; Brockhurst, M.A. Rapid compensatory evolution can rescue low fitness symbioses following partner switching. Curr. Biol. 2021, 31, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Takahashi, T.; Shirai, Y.; Kosaka, T.; Hosoya, H. Arrest of cytoplasmic streaming induces algal proliferation in green paramecia. PLoS ONE 2007, 2, e1352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Takahashi, T.; Yokoyama, S. Bioassay of Components Eluted from Electric Arc Furnace Steel Slag Using Microalgae Chlorella. ISIJ Int. 2016, 56, 1495–1503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Takahashi, T. Quality assessment of microalgae exposed to trace metals using flow cytometry. In Superfood and Functional Food-Development of Superfood and Its Role in Medicine, 1st ed.; Shiomi, N., Waisundara, V.Y., Eds.; InTechOpen: Rijeka, Croatia, 2017; pp. 29–45. [Google Scholar]
  47. Takahashi, T. Efficient interpretation of multiparametric data using principal component analysis as an example of quality assessment of microalgae. In Multidimensional Flow Cytometry Techniques for Novel Highly Informative Assays, 1st ed.; Gemiei, M., Ed.; InTechOpen: Rijeka, Croatia, 2018; pp. 81–97. [Google Scholar]
  48. Takahashi, T. Effects of Eluate Compounds from Steelmaking Slag on Microalgae., In Monitoring Artificial Materials and Microbes in Marine Ecosystems: Interactions and Assessment Methods, 1st ed.; Takahashi, T., Ed.; Bentham Science Publishers: Sharjah, United Arab Emirates, 2020; Volume 2, pp. 255–266. [Google Scholar]
  49. Takahashi, T. Routine Management of Microalgae Using Autofluorescence from Chlorophyll. Molecules 2019, 24, 4441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  50. Takahashi, T. Potential of an Automated- and Image-Based Cell Counter to Accelerate Microalgal Research and Applications. Energies 2020, 13, 6019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Takahashi, T. Usefulness of a microalgal biorefinery in conversion to chemical products and recent technology in automatic evaluation of microalgae. Curr. Opin. Green Sustain. Chem. 2021, 27, 100410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Hassan, H.M. Exacerbation of superoxide radical formation by Paraquat. Methods Enzymol. 1984, 105, 523–532. [Google Scholar]
  53. Kodama, Y.; Nagase, M.; Takahama, A. Symbiotic Chlorella variabilis strain, 1 N, can influence the digestive process in the host Paramecium bursaria during early infection. Symbiosis 2017, 71, 47–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Kodama, Y.; Miyazaki, S. Autolysis of Chlorella variabilis in Starving Paramecium bursaria Help the Host Cell Survive Against Starvation Stress. Curr. Microbiol. 2021, 78, 558–565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Kodama, Y.; Sumita, H. The ciliate Paramecium bursaria allows budding of symbiotic Chlorella variabilis cells singly from the digestive vacuole membrane into the cytoplasm during algal reinfection. Protoplasma 2022, 259, 117–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Lowe, C.D.; Minter, E.J.; Cameron, D.D.; Brockhurst, M.A. Shining a Light on Exploitative Host Control in a Photosynthetic Endosymbiosis. Curr. Biol. 2016, 26, 207–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  57. Tanaka, M.; Ishizaka, Y.; Tosuji, H.; Kunimoto, M.; Nishihara, N.; Kadono, T.; Kawano, T.; Kosaka, T.; Hosoya, N.; Hosoya, H. A new bioassay system for detection of chemical substances in environment using green paramecia, Paramecium bursaria. In Environmental Chemistry, 1st ed.; Lichtfouse, E., Schwarzbauer, J., Robert, D., Eds.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2004; pp. 673–680. [Google Scholar]
  58. Mortuza, M.G.; Takahashi, T.; Ueki, T.; Kosaka, T.; Michibata, H.; Hosoya, H. Toxicity and bioaccumulation of hexavalent chromium in green paramecium, Paramecium bursaria. J. Health Sci. 2005, 51, 676–682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Mortuza, M.G.; Takahashi, T.; Ueki, T.; Kosaka, T.; Michibata, H.; Hosoya, H. Comaparison of hexavalent chromium bioaccumulation in five strains of paramecium, Paramecium bursaria. J. Cell Anim. Biol. 2009, 3, 62–66. [Google Scholar]
  60. Mortuza, M.G.; Takahashi, T.; Kosaka, T.; Hosoya, H. Effect of industrial sludge toxicity on the cell growth of green paramecium, Paramecium bursaria. Glob. J. Environ. Res. 2010, 4, 101–105. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. An example scatter plot of P. bursaria analyzed using microcapillary FCM. Signals in the R1 region with high forward scatter intensity and high red fluorescence intensity correspond to intact P. bursaria cells, while signals in the R2 region with low forward scatter intensity and low red fluorescence intensity correspond to endosymbionts released from broken P. bursaria cells.
Figure 1. An example scatter plot of P. bursaria analyzed using microcapillary FCM. Signals in the R1 region with high forward scatter intensity and high red fluorescence intensity correspond to intact P. bursaria cells, while signals in the R2 region with low forward scatter intensity and low red fluorescence intensity correspond to endosymbionts released from broken P. bursaria cells.
Microorganisms 10 01248 g001
Figure 2. P. bursaria treated with the herbicide paraquat (PQ). (a) Photographs of representative P. bursaria cells treated or not (Cont) with 0.1 μg/mL of PQ for up to 7 d. Scale bar, 50 μm. (b) P. bursaria treated or not with PQ were analyzed using microcapillary FCM. The results are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (n > 320 signals [320 cells of intact P. bursaria]) in a bar graph of red fluorescence intensity.
Figure 2. P. bursaria treated with the herbicide paraquat (PQ). (a) Photographs of representative P. bursaria cells treated or not (Cont) with 0.1 μg/mL of PQ for up to 7 d. Scale bar, 50 μm. (b) P. bursaria treated or not with PQ were analyzed using microcapillary FCM. The results are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (n > 320 signals [320 cells of intact P. bursaria]) in a bar graph of red fluorescence intensity.
Microorganisms 10 01248 g002
Figure 3. Characteristics of red and yellow fluorescence intensities of P. bursaria cells analyzed using FCM. (ac) Scatter plots of yellow fluorescence intensity vs. red fluorescence intensity of P. bursaria cells treated or not (control, day 0) with PQ (0.1 μg/mL). (d) Difference in yellow fluorescence intensity of untreated and PQ-treated (1 d) P. bursaria cells. Data were expressed as mean ± standard error (n > 320 signals [320 cells of intact P. bursaria]). (e) Slop analysis of scatter plots for P. bursaria treated or not with PQ.
Figure 3. Characteristics of red and yellow fluorescence intensities of P. bursaria cells analyzed using FCM. (ac) Scatter plots of yellow fluorescence intensity vs. red fluorescence intensity of P. bursaria cells treated or not (control, day 0) with PQ (0.1 μg/mL). (d) Difference in yellow fluorescence intensity of untreated and PQ-treated (1 d) P. bursaria cells. Data were expressed as mean ± standard error (n > 320 signals [320 cells of intact P. bursaria]). (e) Slop analysis of scatter plots for P. bursaria treated or not with PQ.
Microorganisms 10 01248 g003
Figure 4. Box-and-whisker diagram analysis of ratios of the yellow fluorescence intensity (Yellow FL) to the corresponding red fluorescence intensity (Red FL) of P. bursaria. (a) Changes in the Yellow FL/Red FL ratio throughout the cell cycle of control P. bursaria host cell. (b) Changes in the Yellow FL/Red FL ratio in cells treated with PQ (0.1 μg/mL). The upper and lower error bars indicate the maximum and minimum value, respectively. A bar in each box represents the corresponding median value (n > 320 signals [320 intact P. bursaria cells]).
Figure 4. Box-and-whisker diagram analysis of ratios of the yellow fluorescence intensity (Yellow FL) to the corresponding red fluorescence intensity (Red FL) of P. bursaria. (a) Changes in the Yellow FL/Red FL ratio throughout the cell cycle of control P. bursaria host cell. (b) Changes in the Yellow FL/Red FL ratio in cells treated with PQ (0.1 μg/mL). The upper and lower error bars indicate the maximum and minimum value, respectively. A bar in each box represents the corresponding median value (n > 320 signals [320 intact P. bursaria cells]).
Microorganisms 10 01248 g004
Figure 5. Scatter plots of the red fluorescence intensity (Red FL) vs. the ratio of yellow fluorescence intensity (Yellow FL) to the corresponding Red FL of P. bursaria treated or untreated (control, day 0) with PQ (0.1 μg/mL). (a) Scatter plots for the control and PQ-treated (1–7 d) cells. Panel (a’) shows all scatter plots except for the data for the 7 d PQ treatment, and panel (a’’) shows all scatter plots except for the data for the 3 d PQ treatment.
Figure 5. Scatter plots of the red fluorescence intensity (Red FL) vs. the ratio of yellow fluorescence intensity (Yellow FL) to the corresponding Red FL of P. bursaria treated or untreated (control, day 0) with PQ (0.1 μg/mL). (a) Scatter plots for the control and PQ-treated (1–7 d) cells. Panel (a’) shows all scatter plots except for the data for the 7 d PQ treatment, and panel (a’’) shows all scatter plots except for the data for the 3 d PQ treatment.
Microorganisms 10 01248 g005
Figure 6. The effect of the herbicide PQ on photosynthesis and the evaluation of endosymbiotic algal vitality in P. bursaria using the yellow/red fluorescence intensity ratio. (a) Mechanism of photosynthesis-related PQ toxicity and the associated reactive oxygen species (ROS) production [52]. The acronyms PS, Cyt, N, and CP, respectively, denote photosystem, cytochrome, algal nucleus, and chloroplast. (b) Conceptual diagram of the devised method for the evaluation of the endosymbiotic algal vitality in P. bursaria cells using the yellow/red fluorescence intensity ratio as a stress index.
Figure 6. The effect of the herbicide PQ on photosynthesis and the evaluation of endosymbiotic algal vitality in P. bursaria using the yellow/red fluorescence intensity ratio. (a) Mechanism of photosynthesis-related PQ toxicity and the associated reactive oxygen species (ROS) production [52]. The acronyms PS, Cyt, N, and CP, respectively, denote photosystem, cytochrome, algal nucleus, and chloroplast. (b) Conceptual diagram of the devised method for the evaluation of the endosymbiotic algal vitality in P. bursaria cells using the yellow/red fluorescence intensity ratio as a stress index.
Microorganisms 10 01248 g006
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Takahashi, T. Method for Stress Assessment of Endosymbiotic Algae in Paramecium bursaria as a Model System for Endosymbiosis. Microorganisms 2022, 10, 1248. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10061248

AMA Style

Takahashi T. Method for Stress Assessment of Endosymbiotic Algae in Paramecium bursaria as a Model System for Endosymbiosis. Microorganisms. 2022; 10(6):1248. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10061248

Chicago/Turabian Style

Takahashi, Toshiyuki. 2022. "Method for Stress Assessment of Endosymbiotic Algae in Paramecium bursaria as a Model System for Endosymbiosis" Microorganisms 10, no. 6: 1248. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10061248

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop