Next Article in Journal
Enhancing Biocide Efficacy: Targeting Extracellular DNA for Marine Biofilm Disruption
Next Article in Special Issue
Prevalence and Characterization of Extended-Spectrum β-Lactamase- and Carbapenemase-Producing Enterobacterales from Tunisian Seafood
Previous Article in Journal
Molecular Detection of Anaplasma phagocytophilum and Ehrlichia Species in Ticks Removed from Humans in the Republic of Korea
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Microorganisms
Volume 10
Issue 6
10.3390/microorganisms10061225
microorganisms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

High Throughput Screening of Antimicrobial Resistance Genes in Gram-Negative Seafood Bacteria

by
Sabine Delannoy
1,*,
Corine Hoffer
1,
Raphaëlle Youf
1,†,
Emilie Dauvergne
1,‡,
Hattie E. Webb
2,§,‖,
Thomas Brauge
3,
Mai-Lan Tran
1,
Graziella Midelet
3,
Sophie A. Granier
4,
Marisa Haenni
5,
Patrick Fach
1 and
Anne Brisabois
6
1
COLiPATH Unit & Genomics Platform IdentyPath, Laboratory for Food Safety, ANSES, 94700 Maisons-Alfort, France
2
Department of Animal and Food Sciences, International Center for Food Safety Excellence, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX 79409, USA
3
Bacteriology and Parasitology of Fishery and Aquaculture Products Unit, Laboratory for Food Safety, ANSES, 62200 Boulogne-sur-Mer, France
4
Antibiotics, Biocides, Residues and Resistance Unit, Fougères Laboratory, ANSES, 35306 Fougères, France
5
Antimicrobial Resistance and Bacterial Virulence Unit, Lyon Laboratory, Université de Lyon, ANSES, 69364 Lyon, France
6
Strategy and Programs Department, ANSES, 94700 Maisons-Alfort, France
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
Current address: UMR 1078, GGB, University Brest, Inserm, EFS, 29200 Brest, France.
‡
Current address: Laboratoire AGIR-UR UPJV 4294, UFR de Pharmacie, Université de Picardie Jules Verne, 80037 Amiens, France.
§
Current address: ASRT, Inc., Smyrna, GA 30080, USA.
‖
Current address: Division of Foodborne, Waterborne, and Environmental Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA 30329, USA.
Microorganisms 2022, 10(6), 1225; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10061225
Submission received: 28 March 2022 / Revised: 10 June 2022 / Accepted: 11 June 2022 / Published: 15 June 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Antibiotic Resistance in Marine-Borne Bacteria)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
From a global view of antimicrobial resistance over different sectors, seafood and the marine environment are often considered as potential reservoirs of antimicrobial resistance genes (ARGs) and mobile genetic elements (MGEs); however, there are few studies and sparse results on this sector. This study aims to provide new data and insights regarding the content of resistance markers in various seafood samples and sources, and therefore the potential exposure to humans in a global One Health approach. An innovative high throughput qPCR screening was developed and validated in order to simultaneously investigate the presence of 41 ARGs and 33 MGEs including plasmid replicons, integrons, and insertion sequences in Gram-negative bacteria. Analysis of 268 seafood isolates from the bacterial microflora of cod (n = 24), shellfish (n = 66), flat fishes (n = 53), shrimp (n = 10), and horse mackerel (n = 115) show the occurrence of sul-1, ant(3″)-Ia, aph(3′)-Ia, strA, strB, dfrA1, qnrA, and blaCTX-M-9 genes in Pseudomonas spp., Providencia spp., Klebsiella spp., Proteus spp., and Shewanella spp. isolates and the presence of MGEs in all bacterial species investigated. We found that the occurrence of MGE may be associated with the seafood type and the environmental, farming, and harvest conditions. Moreover, even if MGE were detected in half of the seafood isolates investigated, association with ARG was only identified for twelve isolates. The results corroborate the hypothesis that the incidence of antimicrobial-resistant bacteria (ARB) and ARG decreases with increasing distance from potential sources of fecal contamination. This unique and original high throughput micro-array designed for the screening of ARG and MGE in Gram-negative bacteria could be easily implementable for monitoring antimicrobial resistance gene markers in diverse contexts.

1. Introduction

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a global public health safety issue since antimicrobial-resistant bacteria (ARB) can reduce treatment options and efficiency, especially in Gram-negative bacterial infections [1]. AMR affects both humans and animals, therefore the dissemination of ARB through the food chain and the environment has become a major concern underlined by the World Health Organization [2].
Tackling AMR in animals, food, and humans in a One Health approach is a key priority for public health organizations worldwide as highlighted in the Global Action Plan on AMR from the tripartite Alliance [3]. Current AMR monitoring programs and risk assessment studies on food as a potential AMR transmission route focus on terrestrial food-producing animals; however, data on AMR in seafood are limited. Nevertheless, bacteria of terrestrial origin, including those conferring AMR, can reach the aquatic environments through runoff from land, faeces from wild animals and birds, or through sewage systems [4,5]. Furthermore, residues of antibiotics in rivers can favour the persistence of ARB, while the use of antimicrobials in aquaculture can directly contribute to AMR dissemination [6]. Furthermore, the use of other chemicals such as biocides, commonly used in seafood production and processing facilities, or antifouling agents (containing heavy metals) used on boat hulls, are known to co-select for AMR [7,8,9]. Thus, environmental ecosystems represent a potential reservoir of antimicrobial resistance genes (ARGs) and ARB that can spread to humans through direct contact with animals or consumption of food products. Conversely, anthropogenic activities are a source of ARGs in the environment and need to be investigated [10]. Beyond vertical transmission, ARGs can spread horizontally via mobile genetic elements (MGEs). The latter comprise insertion sequences, transposons, integrons, plasmids, and integrative and conjugative elements (ICEs), which allow the transfer of ARGs to other bacterial cells and, therefore, facilitate the spread of antimicrobial resistance between bacteria sharing the same ecological niche [11,12].
The marine ecosystem can be considered as a large reservoir of ARB and ARGs mostly acquired through faecal contamination of human and/or animal origin. Although global seafood production is growing each year, systematic surveillance of AMR in this sector is largely lacking or has only been at a pilot study level. One main reason for this gap is certainly the difficulties of investigating AMR phenotypes of marine bacteria, which often have specific growth requirements, and often lack standardised antimicrobial susceptibility testing methods and interpretation criteria. Consequently, molecular-based methods such as polymerase chain reaction (PCR) [13], whole genome sequencing (WGS) of isolated bacteria, or metagenomic approaches are favoured nowadays. Several high throughput qPCR methods for analysing hundreds of ARGs in a single experiment have recently been developed and their application has been powerful on environmental samples [14]. Nevertheless, most of them are based on the abundance of targeted genes in bacterial communities and disparities in data analysis have been highlighted [14]. WGS is also a powerful tool to detect ARGs and track potential transmission events [15], but it relies on a bacterial isolation step that can be challenging for marine bacteria. Although commonly used in developed countries for the surveillance of major zoonotic bacteria and foodborne investigations, WGS is still costly, which limits its routine use in a sector where no regulation exists. Further, next generation sequencing (NGS) has also opened the door to metagenomic studies, which are also expensive and complex in their analysis; nonetheless, these methods are of great interest when working with complex sample matrices.
The main objective of this study was to investigate ARGs and MGEs in seafood bacteria, in order to estimate the AMR burden conveyed by the marine sector. For this purpose, we developed and validated an original method, based on high throughput real-time PCR technology, to detect a selection of the most prevalent ARGs and some MGEs commonly found in Gram-negative bacteria using a dynamic microarray “AMR Array” with the Biomark system (Fluidigm). We then applied the developed AMR Array on a selection of Gram-negative bacteria isolated from marine sources.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Collection of Bacterial Strains Isolated from Seafood

A collection of 268 selected Gram-negative isolates recovered from commonly consumed seafood was selected from the Anses collection [16]. Bacterial strains were isolated from cod–Gadus morhua (n = 24), flat fishes (n = 53), pelagic fishes/horse mackerel–Trachurus trachurus (n = 115), shellfish (n = 66), and shrimp (n = 10). Strains were isolated from several organ samples of fresh seafood (skin and gills for fishes), except for horse mackerels which were collected during a sea cruise [17] and were frozen before the analysis [16]. Identification of the genus and species level, when possible, was performed using Maldi-TOF spectra or 16S rDNA sequencing [18]. In total, isolates belonged to eleven different genus or species, Psychrobacter spp. (n = 115), Pseudomonas spp. (n = 50), Proteus spp. (n = 32), Morganella spp. (n = 18), Acinetobacter spp. (n = 16), Providencia spp. (n = 8), Shewanella spp. (n = 10), Seratia spp. (n = 9), Escherichia coli (n = 5), Klebsiella spp. (n = 3), and Enterobacter spp. (n = 2) (Figure 1). The Gram-negative bacteria we chose were those recognised by WHO as clinically relevant in terms of critical antimicrobial resistance. The WHO list of pathogenic bacteria mainly includes Gram-negative bacteria belonging to several genus such as Acinetobacter, Pseudomonas, and various Enterobacteriaceae (including Klebsiella, E. coli, Serratia, and Proteus) [19]. In contrast, Psychrobacter isolates were recovered from a dedicated sampling from horse mackerel and considered as ubiquitous bacteria isolated from various food and environmental sources.

2.2. Selection of Antimicrobial Resistance Markers and Primers Design

A set of 74 ARGs and MGEs were selected based on their public health significance and the role they can play in the dissemination of AMR within Gram-negative bacteria. Among the high number of ARGs that have been described in the literature, we selected those that are the most prevalent or those encoding resistances to critically important antimicrobials for human medicine [19]. Among them, genes conferring resistances to beta-lactams (including cephalosporins and carbapenems), polymyxins, quinolones, aminoglycosides, phenicols, sulfonamides, trimethoprim, and tetracyclines were selected (Table 1). The MGE set included the three intI integron determinants [20], 16 insertion sequence markers, 13 plasmid replicon sequences belonging to the main incompatibility groups [21], and the Tn2 transposon (Table 2).
Primers and Taqman™ probes targeting ARG and MGE markers were either recovered from the literature [22,23,24,25,26,27] or designed for this project (Table S1). For the design of primers and probes, all available sequences of the target region were collected from existing databases (NCBI, ResFinder (downloaded on 16 February 2018), ARG-ANNOT v3 (downloaded on 6 February 2018), CARD (downloaded on 1 February 2018)), and aligned for consensus sequences using the CLC Genomic Workbench (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). When necessary, multiple sets of primers and probes were designed to encompass the described diversity of the target sequence. The designed primers and probes were all controlled in silico and further validated against a panel of control reference strains and field strains already described and well-known for carrying the ARG or MGE (Table S2).

2.3. High Throughput Real-Time PCR System

The Biomark real-time PCR system (Fluidigm, San Francisco, CA, USA) was used for high-throughput microfluidic real-time PCR (HT qPCR) amplification using 96.96 dynamics arrays. DNA extraction was performed using the InstaGene matrix (BioRad Laboratories, Marnes-La-Coquette, Paris, France) according to the manufacturer’s instruction on a single colony of pure culture bacteria isolated on Mueller-Hinton agar (BioRad) or TSYe agar (BioMérieux, Marcy-l’Étoile, France). Dynamic AMR array (Fluidigm) was performed according to the manufacturer’s recommendations using 6-carboxyfluorescein (FAM) and 6-carboxy-2′,4′,5′,7′,7′-hexachlorofluorescein succinimidyl ester (HEX)-labeled TaqMan™ probes and PerfeCTa qPCR ToughMix (Quanta). The thermal profile for the Biomark PCR was used as previously described [28]. PCR cycling comprised of 2 min at 50 °C, 10 min at 95 °C, followed by 40 cycles of 2-step amplification of 15 s at 95 °C, and 1 min at 60 °C. Data were acquired on the Biomark™ Real-Time PCR System and analysed using the Fluidigm Real-time PCR Analysis software to obtain crossing point (CP) values. Testing of the marine bacterial collection included positive controls for each qPCR tests, negative control, as well as a 16S qPCR test as loading control.

2.4. Positive Controls

A collection of positive controls was set up to validate the HT qPCR tests. This control collection included strains (or DNA extracts thereof) for which the targeted ARG or MGE had already been confirmed and/or characterised by WGS. When no strain was available, plasmids with insertion of the targeted ARG or MGE sequences were constructed (Genecust, France). The overall collection included 81 strains (or DNA extracts thereof), 57 of which had been fully sequenced, and 15 recombinant plasmids so that at least one positive control for each target was included (Table S2). Inclusivity of each primer and probe was validated with either control reference strains or surrogate recombinant plasmids. Exclusivity was also checked to ensure no cross-reaction or non-specific detection occurred among the panel of control strains (Table S3).

3. Results

3.1. Validation of the AMR Array Design for Antimicrobial Resistance Markers Detection

A total of 41 different TaqMan real-time PCR markers were designed, which targeted common ARGs found in Gram-negative bacteria (Table 1). Gene markers for the following β-lactamases were included: TEM, SHV, CTX-M-1, CTX-M-2, CTX-M-8, and CTX-M-9 groups, KPC-2/3, PER1, VIM, and NDM-1/2. Plasmid-encoded ampC β-lactamase genes belonging to the CMY family (blaCMY-1/2/3) were also targeted. Among the large family of aminoglycoside resistance genes, marker variants of the aac, ant, and aph families were included, along with armA methylase and streptomycin-resistance genes strA and strB markers (also named aph(6)-Ia and aph(6)-Id, respectively). In addition, three quinolone resistance markers targeting qnr genes (qnrA, qnrB1, qnrS), three sulfonamide resistance markers targeting sul genes (sul1, sul2, sul3), two tetracycline resistance markers (tet(A) and tet(B)), dihydrofolate reductase genes conferring resistance to trimethoprim (dfrA1, dfrA12, dfrA17), six markers of mobile colistin resistance genes (mcr-1/2/3/4/5 and mcr-9), and a marker for floR gene encoding phenicol resistance were also included in the AMR-array design. All adequate primers and probes were tested and validated with either control reference strains or surrogate recombinant plasmids (Table S2). As shown in Table S3 all the primers/probes sets tested exhibited sensitivity and specificity of 100%, except for those targeting ant(3″)-Ia, aph(3′)-la, floR, and sul3 with sensitivity between 86 and 93%, and those targeting aac(3)-IIa, ant(3″)-Ia, aph(3′)-la, and floR with specificity between 89 and 98%.
In this study, we selected sixteen IS elements frequently associated with antimicrobial resistance determinants, and the three classes of integron for investigation. In addition, thirteen markers for the major plasmid incompatibility groups and transposons of the Tn2 family were also investigated. When necessary, several sets of primers and probes were used to cover the target genetic diversity. In total, 47 primers and TaqMan™ probe sets targeted 33 markers of the mobilome of the studied strains. Table S1 presents all targeted MGE. Some targets, especially plasmid replicons, required multiple primers and probes due to high genetic diversity. The sensitivity and specificity of these primers and probe sets were determined with control reference strains (Table S2) and are reported in Table S3. The sensitivity for all targets but eight targets was 100%. For these eight targets (IncFIB, IncFII, IncHI1B, IncI-I1, ISKpn26, IS903, intI1, and Tn2) the sensitivity ranged from 75% to 97%. Similarly, for all targets but four (ISSen4, ISKpn26, IS26, intI1), the specificity was 100%. The specificity was found to be between 88 and 98% for ISSen4, ISKpn26, and intI1. Only IS26 produced a significant number of false positive with a specificity of 50%. The positive predictive value (Number of True positives/(Number of True positives + Number of False positives)) of this test is 84%, thus a positive signal for IS26 still indicates a strong probability of presence of IS26.

3.2. Detection of Antimicrobial Resistance Genes in the Collection of Marine Bacteria

Among the 41 ARG markers investigated with the AMR array on the whole collection of strains, eight different markers detecting the blaCTX-M-9, sul1, strA, strB, qnrA, dfrA1, aph(3′)-Ia, and ant(3″)-Ia genes led to a positive signal (Figure 2). The sulfonamide resistance gene sul1 was detected in five of the 50 Pseudomonas spp. isolates tested, which were all recovered from shrimp samples. The same five Pseudomonas spp. isolates also harboured the ant(3″)-Ia gene. Two other Pseudomonas spp. isolates from flat fishes were positive for strA and strB streptomycin resistance genes. The ant(3″)-Ia gene was also detected in four out of the eight Providencia spp. isolates collected from shellfish, and in one out of the three Klebsiella oxytoca isolate that came from flat fish. The same four Providencia co-harboured the dihydrofolate reductase dfrA1 gene. The aminoglycoside phosphotransferase aph(3′)-Ia gene was detected in one Klebsiella spp. and one Proteus vulgaris isolate from different samples of shellfish, in one Morganella morganii isolate from a flat fish, and in three Psychrobacter spp. isolates collected from horse mackerel. The aph(3′)-Ia –positive Klebsiella spp. was the only isolate of this collection that presented an extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) gene, namely a blaCTX-M-9 group gene. Out of the ten Shewanella spp. isolates, eight from shellfish (one of Shewanella indica, one of Shewanella haliotis, two of Shewanella algae, four of Shewanella spp.) and one from flat fish (Shewanella haliotis) harboured the plasmid-mediated quinolone-resistance qnrA gene. The single Shewanella spp. isolate that was negative for qnrA belonged to the S. putrefaciens species. Finally, no ARG was detected in Acinetobacter spp., Serratia spp., E. coli, and Enterobacter spp., from any of the sources (Figure 2). Furthermore, no ARG were found in any of the cod isolates.

3.3. Detection of Mobile Genetic Elements in the Collection of Marine Bacteria

Among the thirteen plasmid incompatibility groups targeted, six were detected among the collection of marine bacteria (Figure 3). IncF plasmids can carry multiple types of replicons; in this study, we detected IncFII in one Serratia quinivorans isolate and IncFIA in one Psychrobacter spp. isolate from horse mackerel. The IncFIB replicon was identified in one Klebsiella spp. isolate collected from shellfish as well as in one Enterobacter cloacae and one Psychrobacter spp. isolate collected from shrimp. The IncHI1 replicon was detected in one E. coli isolate from shellfish. Three other E. coli and one Klebsiella oxytoca isolate from flat fish samples carried an IncL replicon. The same Klebsiella oxytoca isolate, as well as one Enterobacter cloacae isolate collected from flat fish, also harboured an IncR replicon. Presence of integrase genes from the three classes of integrons were investigated. Eight Pseudomonas spp. isolates, seven of which were isolated from shrimps and one from shellfish, carried intI1, whereas intI2 was detected in four Providencia spp. from shellfish and one Klebsiella oxytoca isolated from a flat fish sample. None of the isolates carried an intI3.
Among the sixteen IS elements targeted in different species of the collection of marine strains, nine were detected in several bacteria species. The presence of IS26 was probable in six Serratia spp., four E. coli, three Klebsiella spp., two Psychrobacter spp., and one Proteus spp. isolate collected from shellfish, flat fishes, cod, and horse mackerel. IS903 was found in the same Klebsiella spp., E. coli, and Serratia isolates positive for IS26, as well as in one Proteus and one Psychrobacter spp. isolate. IS4321 was detected in 16 out of the 18 Morganella spp. tested, in all three Klebsiella spp. isolates, in four out of the five E. coli tested, in three Proteus spp. isolates, in seven Serratia spp., and one Shewanella spp. isolate. ISAba24 was detected in one Shewanella spp. while ISAba125 was found in three Acinetobacter spp. isolates. ISEc33 was detected in two Klebsiella spp. and two Serratia spp. isolates, ISSEn4 marker was found in four E. coli and two Klebsiella spp. isolates. ISKpn14 was identified in one Klebsiella spp., while ISKpn26 was detected in all three Klebsiella spp., in four E. coli, two Serratia spp., and one Providencia spp. isolate.

3.4. Combined Detection of ARGs and MGEs

Out of the 268 strains tested, 76 (28.4%) gave a positive signal either for ARG (n = 27) or for MGE markers (n = 61), but only 12 carried both ARGs and MGEs (Figure 4). Among these 12 isolates, five Pseudomonas spp. isolated from shrimps harboured sul1 and ant(3″)-Ia genes associated with intI1, while four Providencia spp. isolates collected from shellfish harboured the ant(3″)-Ia and drfA1 genes together with intI2. Two Klebsiella, one isolated from shellfish and one K. oxytoca isolated from flat fish, simultaneously harboured ARGs as well as multiple IS elements and at least one plasmid marker. One of the qnrA-positive Shewanella spp. isolate was also found positive for IS43210.

4. Discussion

Antimicrobial resistance is a major public health issue and concerns not only human and veterinary sectors but also the overall environmental and food sectors. Therefore, detection and identification of ARG content in food and food-producing environments is complementary to the data available for human and animals sectors for a One Health approach as highlighted in in a recent EFSA scientific opinion [5]. Although AMR data on key pathogens exist for some seafood items, AMR surveillance has not been implemented as it has for the zoonosis monitoring plans in terrestrial food animals. In the 2017 report “A European One Health Action Plan against Antimicrobial resistance”, the European Commission calls for efforts to close knowledge gaps regarding the contribution of the environment to the AMR in humans and there is a need to determine occurrence and temporal trends of AMR in the environment including the marine sector [29].
Only a few studies have looked for the presence of ARB and ARGs in post-harvested fish and shellfish, but these have detected priority pathogens or fish pathogens and other commensal or opportunistic marine and freshwater bacteria [30]. A study of wild fish in Algerian Mediterranean reported 21.3% of ESBL-producing carriage in E. coli, K. pneumoniae, Enterobacter clocae, Morganella morganii, Citrobacter freundii, and Proteus vulgaris presumably contaminated with untreated human sewage [31]. A study of wild freshwater fish reported ESBL-E. coli in 0–85% of sample depending on the geographical site of sampling and human faecal pollution [32]. Few studies have reported ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae in shellfish production and retail [33,34]. In all, available data on AMR in marine and seafood bacteria are scarce and diverse according to the source of samples, targeted bacteria, and methodologies used for AMR or ARG detection. Although global seafood production is growing each year, systematic surveillance of AMR in this sector is largely lacking or is only at a pilot study level. One main reason for this gap is certainly the difficulties of investigating the AMR phenotypes of marine bacteria, which often have specific growth requirements, in the absence of any standardised methods or interpretation criteria.
In this study, we focused on selected ARGs that are of highest priority for public health concern, frequently plasmid-mediated and associated with various mobile genetic elements, including integrons, transposons, or insertion sequences. Investigation of MGEs is complementary to the ARG detection and brings insights on the potential capacity of ARGs to disseminate [35]. High throughput qPCR is a fast and convenient method for the simultaneous investigation of a large number of genes or genetic markers, and can advantageously be used to screen hundreds of ARGs or MGEs. The AMR-Array developed here offers a powerful tool to explore ARG and MGE content of seafood bacteria and therefore the potential exposure to human through seafood consumption. Here, we explored the role of seafood-associated bacteria as a potential reservoir and route of diffusion of antimicrobial resistant bacteria isolated from four different types and geographical sources of seafood, shrimp and shellfish, which are farmed products, whereas cod, horse-mackerel, and flat fishes are wild fishes.
Our results revealed the presence of several insertion sequences, plasmids, and class 1 and class 2 integrons in fifty-five isolates. All of these targeted MGEs have the ability to contain gene cassettes encoding resistance to several antimicrobials. They are known to carry integrons, which can contain genes for site-specific recombination and are capable of capturing and mobilising gene cassettes. In this study, five Pseudomonas spp. isolates from shrimp carried a class-1 integron and sul1 and ant(3″)-Ia genes encoding resistance to sulfonamides and aminoglycosides. Class-1 integrons harbouring such gene cassettes are common [36,37]; and were previously identified in Enterobacter cloacae, Aeromonas hydrophila, Klebsiella oxytoca, and Citrobacter freundii in seafood from Japan [38], fish farms in Egypt [39], Aeromonas spp. isolated from rainbow trout in Australia [40], fresh fish in Mexico [41], E. coli from commercial fish and seafood in Korea [42], as well as Salmonella enterica from imported seafood in the United States [43]. None of these studies identified any class-2 integrons, whereas our study identified four Providencia spp. isolates from shellfish harbouring class-2 integron and ant(3″)-Ia and drfA1 genes and one Klebsiella oxytoca strain isolated from flat fish carrying a class-2 integron, several insertion sequences (IS26, IS903, IS4321, ISKpn14, ISKpn26, ISSEn4), plasmid replicons (IncL/M and IncR), and the ant(3″)-Ia gene. Class-2 integrons have previously been found in E. coli isolates from samples of aquaculture water [44]. The presence of class-2 integrons with dfrA1- ant(3″)-Ia cassette arrays is common in the Proteae tribe [45]. Nevertheless, our study focused only on the three main classes of integrons whereas a recent publication mentioned the large diversity of the environmental pool of integrons and their role in the bacterial adaptation in response to environmental pressure [46].
IS26 and IS903 are frequently detected in clinical ESBL-producing E. coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae [47]. Interestingly, such IS were identified in the tested Klebsiella spp., E. coli, and Serratia spp. isolates; moreover, a CTX-M-9 group encoding gene was detected in one Klebsiella sp. isolated from shellfish. Such results suggest that seafood isolates could act as a reservoir of these IS associated with such ESBL genes. Furthermore, other genetic determinants of concern, such as ARGs not included in the microarray, heavy metals resistance, or other functions could be hosted. Thus, acquisition of ARGs on plasmids containing IS could occur further according to the ecological niches of the isolates, environmental factors, and selection pressures. Insertion sequence IS4321 was detected in the same species of seafood isolates and in Proteus spp. and Morganella spp. isolates from shellfish. While no ARGs were detected in the isolates of the last two genus in this study, clinical Proteus and Morganella isolates often carry ARG cassettes and the TnpA transposase for IS4321 [48,49]. However, none of the IS included in the microarray were found in the single Proteus vulgaris isolate carrying the aph(3′)-Ia gene. While it could be carried by another IS we did not target, it could also be carried by a non-mobile chromosomal locus.
Among the large variety of transferable plasmids described in Enterobacteriaceae [50], we targeted those that are known to be associated with ARGs. IncF, IncH, IncL/M conjugative plasmids, and IncR plasmid families were detected in only eleven isolates. IncR plasmids have been previously described in Salmonella spp. and Klebsiella spp. [51]; furthermore, IncR have been reported carrying ARGs mediating resistance to five different classes of antibiotics in clinical Enterobacterales from different geographical regions [52,53]. Moreover, the pool of resistance genes carried by IncR plasmids may spread to transferable plasmids through transposition or plasmid recombination events [54]. Here, we detected two isolates carrying an IncR plasmid replicon: one Enterobacter cloacae strain from flat fishes, and one K. oxytoca from the same source that also carried an IncL/M replicon, several IS, and intI2. The review of Rozwandowicz reported IncHI1B frequently in MDR K. pneumoniae [55]. Our study identified one IncHI1B E. coli strain from shellfish. In addition, both plasmid replicons and ARG were only detected together in two isolates of Klebsiella spp., one K. oxytoca isolated from flat fish carrying ant(3″)-Ia gene, several IS and IncL/M as well IncR., other one isolated from shellfish carrying aph(3′)-Ia, blaCTXM-9 group genes, IncFIB, and several IS.
Finally, of the plasmid replicons, insertion sequences, and integrons targeted, we observed the presence of mobile genetic elements in 80%, 51%, 11%, 5%, and 4% of samples from shrimps, shellfish, flat fishes, horse mackerel, and cod, respectively. These results are consistent with the ecological niches of seafood samples. Indeed, cod and horse mackerel are deep sea wild fishes whose environment is rarely contaminated by anthropogenic sources and sewage. On the contrary, flat fishes (for example Solea solea, Pleuronectes platesa, Limanda limanda) belong to benthic species that preferentially live in shallow water near sandstone at the limit of fresh water, which are at much higher risk of being contaminated by Enterobacteriaceae (E. coli, Klebsiella spp., Morganella morganii, Enterobacter cloacae).
The presence of the qnrA gene was detected in 9 out of the 10 Shewanella spp. isolates tested. This gene has been described as naturally present in the chromosome of Shewanella algae and may have served as progenitor of qnrA acquisition in Enterobacteriaceae [56,57]. Our Shewanella isolates included two species other than Shewanella algae (Shewanella haliotis, Shewanella indica), as well as four Shewanella isolates for which it was not possible to determine the species. These species could, like Shewanella algae, naturally harbour a qnrA or qnrA-like gene in their genomes detected by our device. Alternatively, they could also have received the qnrA gene mobilised long time ago from Shewanella algae, and circulating on many mobile genetic elements; this event could be of more public health concern than the prior one. We should highlight that we did not detect any of the MGE on our array in these isolates besides an IS43210 in a single Shewanella haliotis isolate. This fact is much more in favour of an intrinsic resistance gene displayed by most of Shewanella spp. Shewanella putrifaciens is found mainly in marine environment, and contrary to other Shewanella species, no quinolone-mediated resistance qnrA genes was detected in our array for the S. putrefaciens isolate. The absence of the qnrA gene in Shewanella putrefaciens has already been described [56]. Interestingly, one single Klebsiella spp. strain recovered from shellfish carried a blaCTXM-9 group gene out of the blaCTX-M genes of groups 1, 2, 8, and 9 tested, which are usually highly reported worldwide in clinical E.coli and Klebsiella spp. [58]. Such blaCTX-M-9 group genes have already been described in clinical Klebsiella spp., mostly in Asia, in line with the geographical origin of shellfish investigated here [58]. Nevertheless, only sparse data on blaCTX-M genes in seafood bacteria are available.
The streptomycin resistance genes strA-strB were identified in a Pseudomonas isolate. The occurrence and expression of these genes has been already studied for Pseudomonas syringae, suggesting the importance of these bacteria as a potential reservoir of antibiotic resistance in the environment [59]. As MGEs have not been found in the strA-strB positive Pseudomonas isolate and in the aph(3′)-Ia-positive Morganella morganii isolate, these could be either chromosomally encoded genes or might have been mobilised by other MGE not included in this array. Only WGS and in silico analysis might be able to answer this question. Approximately half of the shellfish samples carried MGEs. These samples were composed of oysters, mussels, and scallops harvested on the coastline. Therefore, they are most likely under selective environmental pressure from sewage and other anthropogenic sources which can explain the frequent occurrence of positive MGE strains. Nevertheless, out of the fifty-five MGE-positive isolates, only six harboured ARGs: four Providencia spp. isolates positive for ant(3″)-Ia and drfA1 that also carried an intI2 integron, one Klebsiella spp. isolate positive for aph(3′)-Ia and blaCTX-M-9 group genes that also carried a IncFIB plasmid replicon and several IS elements, and one Shewanella haliotis isolate positive for qnrA and IS4321. Seven of the ten imported shrimp samples carried intI1 and another one carried an IncFIB plasmid replicon.
We noticed the absence of ARGs detection in Acinetobacter, E. coli, and Enterobacter cloacae which usually carry ARGs, especially in clinical or animal isolates. Although we cannot preclude the presence of other, non-tested, rare ARGs, the absence of ARG in such marine strains in our study could be explained by a lack of antibiotic pressure in the marine niches even if other environmental factors might select for resistance. However, only few data are available to corroborate the hypothesis as most studies have been conducted on wastewater effluents.

5. Conclusions

Although it has been hypothesised that marine environments and seafood serve as a reservoir for ARGs and MGEs, only a few studies have been conducted on the bacterial flora of seafood to assess the prevalence of ARGs and MGEs. Here, we aimed to investigate some of the most prevalent ARGs and MGEs found in Gram-negative bacteria in seafood samples from different sources. We hypothesised that the occurrence of ARGs and MGEs could be associated with the nature of seafood and environmental, farming, and harvesting factors. Only 12 (4.5%) out of the 268 isolates displayed ARG-MGE associated patterns, which does not support the hypothesis of ARG transmission via horizontal transfer and the high level of human exposure directly or through seafood consumption. Nevertheless, MGE-positive isolates in seafood could act as reservoir for the acquisition of gene cassettes further along the food chain, i.e., during the transformation, distribution, or consumption of the seafood products, up to the clinical bacteria species recovered in human samples. These conclusions are in line with a recent report reviewing data on the contamination of aquatic and terrestrial environments in France for ARB and ARGs [4]. Our results corroborate the hypothesis that the proportions of ARB and ARGs decrease with increasing distance from the sources of contamination. The innovative AMR microarray designed in this study is a powerful high throughput tool, robust and easy to implement, for monitoring of some relevant ARGs and MGEs in any indicator selected bacteria from any specific ecosystem. It could also be a powerful tool for investigation of ARG and MGE content in complex DNA samples from various sources. This AMR microarray is easily adaptable and new relevant genetic markers can be implemented to accommodate the emergence of new ARGs.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/microorganisms10061225/s1. Table S1: Primers and probes targeting Antimicrobial Resistance genes (ARG) and Mobile genetic elements (MGE) (see Refs. [22,23,24,25,26,27]). Table S2: Controls used to validate the assays. Table S3: Sensitivity and specificity of the assays used in this study.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.B., S.D. and P.F.; methodology and investigation, S.D., C.H., R.Y., E.D., M.-L.T. and T.B.; validation, S.D., S.A.G., H.E.W. and M.H.; formal analysis, S.D., P.F. and A.B.; writing—original draft preparation, S.D. and A.B.; writing—review and editing, P.F., M.H., S.A.G., H.E.W., T.B., G.M., S.D. and A.B.; supervision, A.B.; project administration, P.F. and A.B.; funding acquisition, P.F. and A.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was partially funded by a grant from the French research government and the “Hauts de France” Region in the framework of the project CPER 2014-2020 MARCO and by a grant from the French General Directorate for Food in the frame of “EcoAntibio2”, Program, 2017.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to gratefully thank DTU (Valeria Bortolaia), BfR (Lothar Beutin and Jens A. Hammerl), Sciensano (Cristina Garcia-Graells), Public Health Agency of Canada (Mike Mulvey), Ifremer, Inrae (Catherine Schouler), UMR-S1092 (Marie-Cécile Ploy, Elena Buelow), Texas Tech University (Guy Loneragan), Institut Pasteur (Simon Le Hello), and CNR E.coli from Robert Debré Hospital (Stéphane Bonacorsi, Patricia Mariani-Kurkdjian, Aurélie Cointe, and André Birgy) for providing control strains and /or DNA controls for validation of the AMR-Array system.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Doi, Y.; Bonomo, R.A.; Hooper, D.C.; Kaye, K.S.; Johnson, J.R.; Clancy, C.J.; Thaden, J.T.; Stryjewski, M.E.; van Duin, D. Gram-Negative Committee of the Antibacterial Resistance Leadership Group (ARLG). Gram-negative bacterial infections: Research priorities, accomplishments, and future directions of the antibacterial resistance leadership group. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2017, 15, S30–S35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. WHO (World Health Organization). WHO Advisory Group on Integrated Surveillance of Antimicrobial Resistance (AGISAR), Report of the 7th Meeting, 2018, Raleigh, NC, USA, 17–20 October 2016. Available online: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/272714/WHO-NMH-FOS-FZD-18.1-eng.pdf?ua=1 (accessed on 2 June 2022).
  3. WHO (World Health Organization); FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization); OIE (World Organization for Animal Health). Monitoring and Evaluation of the Global Action Plan on Antimicrobial Resistance—Framework and Recommended Indicators. 2019. Available online: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/325006/9789241515665eng.pdf (accessed on 2 June 2022).
  4. Haenni, M.; Dagot, C.; Chesneau, O.; Bibbal, D.; Labanowski, J.; Vialette, M.; Bouchard, D.; Martin-Laurent, F.; Calsat, L.; Nazaret, S.; et al. Environmental contamination in a high-income country (France) by antibiotics, antibiotic-resistant bacteria, and antibiotic resistance genes: Status and possible causes. Environ. Int. 2022, 159, 107047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. EFSA BIOHAZ Panel (European Food Safety Authority Panel on Biological Hazards); Koutsoumanis, K.; Allende, A.; Alvarez-Ordoñez, A.; Bolton, D.; Bover-Cid, S.; Chemaly, M.; Davies, R.; De Cesare, A.; Herman, L.; et al. Scientific Opinion on the role played by the environment in the emergence and spread of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) through the food chain. EFSA J. 2021, 19, 6651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Higuera-Llantén, S.; Vásquez-Ponce, F.; Barrientos-Espinoza, B.; Mardones, F.O.; Marshall, S.H.; Olivares Pacheco, J. Extended antibiotic treatment in salmon farms select multiresistant gut bacteria with a high prevalence of antibiotic resistance genes. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0203641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization); WHO (World Health Organization). Expert Meeting Report on Foodborne Antimicrobial Resistance, Role of Environment, Crops and Biocides; Summary Report 11615; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  8. Sellera, F.; Fernandes, M.; Moura, Q.; Carvalho, M.P.N.; Lincopan, N. Extended-Spectrum-βlactamase (CTX-M)-producing Escherichia coli in wild fishes from a polluted area in the Atlantic Coast of South America. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2018, 135, 183–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. McIntosh, D.; Cunningham, M.; Ji, B.; Fekete, F.A.; Parry, E.M.; Clark, S.E.; Ritchie, R. Transferable, multiple antibiotic and mercury resistance in Atlantic Canadian isolates of Aeromonas salmonicida subsp. salmonicida is associated with carriage of an IncA/C plasmid similar to the Salmonella enterica plasmid pSN254. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2008, 61, 1221–1228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Buelow, E.; Bayjanov, J.R.; Majoor, E.; Willems, R.J.L.; Bonten, M.J.M.; Schmitt, H.; van Schaik, W. Limited influence of hospital wastewater on the microbiome and resistome of wastewater in a community sewerage system. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2018, 94, fiy087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Partridge, S.R.; Kwong, S.M.; Firth, N.; Jensen, S.O. Mobile genetic elements associated with antimicrobial resistance. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2018, 31, e00088-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Madec, J.Y.; Haenni, M. Antimicrobial resistance plasmid reservoir in food and food-producing animals. Plasmid 2018, 99, 72–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Anjum, M.F.; Zankari, E.; Hasman, H. Molecular methods for detection of antimicrobial resistance. Clin. Microbiol. 2017, 5, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Waseem, H.; Jameel, S.; Ali, J.; Rehman, H.S.U.; Tauseef, I.; Farooq, U.; Jamal, A.; Ali, M.I. Contributions and challenges of high throughput qPCR for determining antimicrobial resistance in the environment: A critical review. Molecules 2019, 24, 163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Hendriksen, R.S.; Munk, P.; Njage, P.; Van Bunnik, B.; McNally, L.; Lukjancenko, O.; Röder, T.; Nieuwenhuijse, D.; Pedersen, S.K.; Kjeldgaard, J.; et al. Global monitoring of antimicrobial resistance based on metagenomics analyses of urban sewage. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 1124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Briet, A. Etude de la Flore Bactérienne et de sa Résistance aux Antibiotiques des Produits de la Pêche et de L’aquaculture. Sciences et Techniques des Pêches. Université du Littoral Côte d’Opale. 11 December 2018. Français (NNT:2018DUNK0494). HAL Id: Tel-02021052, Version 1. Available online: https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-02021052/document (accessed on 2 June 2022).
  17. Travers-Trolet, M.; Verin, Y. CAMANOC cruise. RV Thalass. 2014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Brauge, T.; Trigueros, S.; Briet, A.; Debuiche, S.; Leleu, G.; Gassilloud, B.; Wilhelm, A.; Py, J.-S.; Midelet, G. MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry fingerprinting performance versus 16S rDNA sequencing to identify bacterial microflora from seafood products and sea water samples. Front. Mar. Sci. 2021, 8, 650116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Tacconelli, E.; Carrara, E.; Savoldi, A.; Harbarth, S.; Mendelson, M.; Monnet, D.L.; Pulcini, C.; Kahlmeter, G.; Kluytmans, J.; Carmeli, Y.; et al. Discovery, research, and development of new antibiotics: The WHO priority list of antibiotic-resistant bacteria and tuberculosis. Lancet Infect Dis. 2018, 18, 318–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Gillings, M.R.; Gaze, W.H.; Pruden, A.; Smalla, K.; Tiedje, J.M.; Zhu, Y.-G. Using the class 1 integron-integrase gene as a proxy for anthropogenic pollution. ISME J. 2015, 9, 1269–1279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Carattoli, A. Resistance plasmid families in Enterobacteriaceae. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2009, 53, 2227–2238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Rochegüe, T.; Haenni, M.; Cazeau, G.; Metayer, V.; Madec, J.Y.; Ferry, T.; Lupo, A. An inventory of 44 qPCR assays using hydrolysis probes operating with a unique amplification condition for the detection and quantification of antibiotic resistance genes. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2021, 100, 115328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Quirós, P.; Colomer-Lluch, M.; Martínez-Castillo, A.; Miró, E.; Argente, M.; Jofre, J. Antibiotic-resistance genes in the bacteriophage DNA fraction of human fecal samples. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2014, 58, 606–609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Toner, G.; Russell, C.D.; Hamilton, F.; Templeton, K.; Laurenson, I.F. Phenotypic and molecular detection methods for carbapenemase-producing organisms and their clinical significance at two Scottish tertiary care hospitals. J. Med. Microbiol. 2019, 68, 560–565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Colomer-Lluch, M.; Jofre, J.; Muniesa, M. Quinolone resistance genes (qnrA and qnrS) in bacteriophage particles from wastewater samples and the effect of inducing agents on packaged antibiotic resistance genes. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2014, 69, 1265–1274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Irrgang, A.; Roschanski, N.; Tenhagen, B.A.; Grobbel, M.; Skladnikiewicz-Ziemer, T.; Thomas, K.; Roesler, U.; Käsbohrer, A. Prevalence of mcr-1 in E. coli from livestock and food in Germany, 2010–2015. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0159863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Muziasari, W.I.; Pärnänen, K.; Johnson, T.A.; Lyra, C.; Karkman, A.; Stedtfeld, R.D.; Tamminen, M.; Tiedje, J.M.; Virta, M. Aquaculture changes the profile of antibiotic resistance and mobile genetic element associated genes in Baltic Sea sediments. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2016, 92, fiw052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  28. Bugarel, M.; Martin, A.; Fach, P.; Beutin, L. Virulence gene profiling of enterohemorrhagic (EHEC) and enteropathogenic (EPEC) Escherichia coli strains: A basis for molecular risk assessment of typical and atypical EPEC strains. BMC Microbiol. 2011, 11, 142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  29. A European One Health Action Plan against Antimicrobial Resistance (AMR). Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/health/system/files/2020-01/amr_2017_action-plan_0.pdf (accessed on 2 June 2022).
  30. Brisabois, A.; Svanevik, C.; Price-Hayward, M.; Bortolaia, V.; Leoni, F.; Granier, S.; Latini, M.; Magistrali, C.F.; Lunestad, B.-T.; Peyrat, M.-B.; et al. ASK network for antimicrobial resistance in seafood as common ground for knowledge exchange. Zenodo 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Brahmi, S.; Touati, A.; Dunyach-Remy, C.; Sotto, A.; Pantel, A.; Lavigne, J.P. High prevalence of extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing enterobacteriaceae in wildfish from the mediterranean sea in Algeria. Microb. Drugs Resist. 2018, 24, 290–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Bollache, L.; Bardet, E.; Depret, G.; Motreuil, S.; Neuwirth, C.; Moreau, J.; Hartmann, A. Dissemination of CTX-M-producing Escherichia coli in freshwater fishes from a French watershed (Burgundy). Front. Microbiol. 2019, 9, 3239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Grevskott, D.H.; Svanevik, C.S.; Sunde, M.; Wester, A.L.; Lunestad, B.T. Marine bivalve mollusks as possible indicators of multidrug-resistant Escherichia coli and other species of the enterobacteriaceae family. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Vu, T.T.T.; Alter, T.; Roesler, U.; Roschanski, N.; Huehn, S. Investigation of extended-spectrum and AmpC β-lactamase-producing enterobacteriaceae from retail seafood in Berlin, Germany. J. Food Prot. 2018, 81, 1079–1086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Frost, L.S.; Leplae, R.; Summers, A.O.; Toussaint, A. Mobile genetic elements: The agents of open source evolution. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2005, 3, 722–732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Hall, R.M.; Collis, C.M. Antibiotic resistance in gram-negative bacteria: The role of gene cassettes and integrons. Drug Resist. Updates 1998, 1, 109–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Domingues, S.; Da Silva, G.J.; Magne Nielsen, K. Global dissemination patterns of common gene cassette arrays in class 1 integrons. Microbiology 2015, 161, 1313–1337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Ahmed, A.M.; Maruyama, A.; Khalifa, H.O.; Shimamoto, T.; Shimamoto, T. Seafood as a reservoir of gram-negative bacteria carrying integrons and antimicrobial resistance genes in Japan. Biomed. Environ. Sci. 2015, 28, 924–926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Ishida, Y.; Ahmed, A.M.; Mahfouz, N.B.; Kimura, T.; El-Khodery, S.A.; Moawad, A.A.; Shimamoto, T. Molecular analysis of antimicrobial resistance in gram-negative bacteria isolated from fish farms in Egypt. J. Vet. Med. Sci. 2010, 72, 727–734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  40. Ndi, O.L.; Barton, M.D. Incidence of class 1 integron and other antibiotic resistance determinants in Aeromonas spp. from rainbow trout farms in Australia. J. Fish Dis. 2011, 34, 589–599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Sarria-Guzman, Y.; Lopez-Ramirez, M.P.; Chavez-Romero, Y.; Ruiz-Romero, E.; Dendooven, L.; Bello-Lopez, J.M. Identification of antibiotic resistance cassettes in class 1 integrons in Aeromonas spp. strains isolated from fresh fish (Cyprinus carpio L.). Curr. Microbiol. 2014, 68, 581–586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Ryu, S.H.; Park, S.G.; Choi, S.M.; Hwang, Y.O.; Ham, H.J.; Kim, S.U.; Lee, Y.K.; Kim, M.S.; Park, G.Y.; Kim, K.S.; et al. Antimicrobial resistance and resistance genes in Escherichia coli strains isolated from commercial fish and seafood. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2012, 152, 14–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Khan, A.A.; Ponce, E.; Nawaz, M.S.; Cheng, M.S.; Khan, J.A.; West, C.S. Identification and characterization of class 1 integron resistance gene cassettes among Salmonella strains isolated from imported seafood. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2009, 75, 1192–1196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Tajbakhsh, E.; Khamesipour, F.; Ranjbar, R.; Ugwu, I.C. Prevalence of class 1 and 2 integrons in multi-drug resistant Escherichia coli isolated from aquaculture water in Chaharmahal Va Bakhtiari province, Iran. Ann. Clin. Microbiol. Antimicrob. 2015, 14, 37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Mendes Moreira, A.; Couvé-Deacon, E.; Bousquet, P.; Chainier, D.; Jové, T.; Ploy, M.-C.; Barraud, O. Proteae: A reservoir of class 2 integrons? J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2019, 74, 1560–1562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Sandoval-Quintana, E.; Lauga, B.; Cagnon, C. Environmental integrons: The dark side of the integrin world. Trends Microbiol. 2022. online ahead of print. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Roshani, M.; Goudarzi, H.; Hashemi, A.; Ardebili, A.; Erfanimanesh, S. Detection of IS903, IS26 and ISEcp1 elements in CTX-M-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae and Escherichia coli isolates from patients with leukemia in Iran. Jundishapur. J. Microbiol. 2018, 11, e58929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Chen, Y.P.; Lei, C.W.; Kong, L.H.; Zeng, J.X.; Zhang, X.Z.; Liu, B.H.; Li, Y.; Xiang, R.; Wang, Y.X.; Chen, D.Y.; et al. Tn6450, a novel multidrug resistance transposon characterized in a Proteus mirabilis isolate from chicken in China. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2018, 62, e02192-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  49. Chen, Y.; Lei, C.; Zuo, L.; Kong, L.; Kang, Z.; Zeng, J.; Zhang, X.; Wang, H. A novel cfr-carrying Tn7 transposon derivative characterized in Morganella morganii of swine origin in China. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2019, 74, 603–606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. McMillan, E.A.; Jackson, C.R.; Frye, J.G. Transferable plasmids of Salmonella enterica associated with antibiotic resistance genes. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 11, 562181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Garcia-Fernandez, A.; Chiaretto, G.; Bertini, A.; Villa, L.; Fortini, D.; Ricci, A.; Carattoli, A. Multilocus sequence typing of IncI1 plasmids carrying extended-spectrum β-lactamases in Escherichia coli and Salmonella of human and animal origin. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2008, 61, 1229–1233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Guo, Q.; Spychala, C.N.; McElheny, C.L.; Doi, Y. Comparative analysis of an IncR plasmid carrying armA, blaDHA-1 and qnrB4 from Klebsiella pneumoniae ST37 isolates. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2016, 71, 882–886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Shankar, C.; Kumar, S.; Venkatesan, M.; Veeraraghavan, B. Emergence of ST147 Klebsiella pneumoniae carrying blaNDM-7 on IncA/C2 with ompK35 and ompK36 mutations in India. J. Infect. Public Health 2019, 12, 741–743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Compain, F.; Frangeul, L.; Drieux, L.; Verdet, C.; Brisse, S.; Arlet, G.; Decré, D. Complete nucleotide sequence of two multidrug-resistant IncR plasmids from Klebsiella pneumoniae. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2014, 58, 4207–4210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Rozwandowicz, M.; Brouwer, M.S.M.; Fischer, J.; Wagenaar, J.A.; Gonzalez-Zorn, B.; Guerra, B.; Mevius, D.J.; Hordijk, J. Plasmids carrying antimicrobial resistance genes in Enterobacteriaceae. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2018, 73, 1121–1137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Poirel, L.; Rodriguez-Martinez, J.M.; Mammeri, H.; Liard, H.; Nordmann, P. Origin of plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance determinant QnrA. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2005, 49, 3523–3525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  57. Jacoby, G.A.; Chow, N.; Waites, K.B. Prevalence of plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2003, 47, 559–562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  58. Lascols, C.; Hackel, M.; Hujer, A.M.; Marshall, S.H.; Bouchillon, S.K.; Hoban, D.J.; Hawser, S.P.; Badal, R.E.; Bonomoc, R.A. Using nucleic acid microarrays to perform molecular epidemiology and detect novel β-Lactamases: A snapshot of extended-spectrum β-lactamases throughout the world. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2012, 50, 1632–1639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  59. Sundin, G.; Bender, C. Expression of the strA-strB streptomycin resistance genes in Pseudomonas syringae and Xanthomonas campestris and characterization of IS6100 in X. campestris. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1995, 61, 2891–2897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Microorganisms 10 01225 g001 550
Figure 1. Bacterial isolates studied and their seafood sources.
Figure 1. Bacterial isolates studied and their seafood sources.
Microorganisms 10 01225 g001
Microorganisms 10 01225 g002 550
Figure 2. Occurrence of antimicrobial resistance genes in Gram-negative isolates from seafood (N = 268).
Figure 2. Occurrence of antimicrobial resistance genes in Gram-negative isolates from seafood (N = 268).
Microorganisms 10 01225 g002
Microorganisms 10 01225 g003 550
Figure 3. Occurrence of mobile genetic element markers in Gram-negative isolates from seafood (N = 268).
Figure 3. Occurrence of mobile genetic element markers in Gram-negative isolates from seafood (N = 268).
Microorganisms 10 01225 g003
Microorganisms 10 01225 g004 550
Figure 4. Co-occurrence of antimicrobial resistance genes and mobile genetic element markers in Gram-negative isolates from seafood (N = 268).
Figure 4. Co-occurrence of antimicrobial resistance genes and mobile genetic element markers in Gram-negative isolates from seafood (N = 268).
Microorganisms 10 01225 g004
Table
Table 1. Antimicrobial resistance genes (ARGs) selected for the AMR–Array design.
Table 1. Antimicrobial resistance genes (ARGs) selected for the AMR–Array design.
Antimicrobial ClassAMR Gene FamillyAMR Genes
AminoglycosidesAminoglycoside acetyltransferase (AAC)aac(6′)-Ib, aac(6′)-Ib-cr, aac(3)-IIa, aac(3)-IV
Aminoglycoside nucleotidyltransferase (ANT)ant(2″)-Ia, ant(3″)-Ia
Aminoglycoside phosphotransferase (APH)aph(3′)-Ia, strA (aph(3″)-Ib), strB (aph(6)-Id)
16S rRNA methyltransferasearmA
β-lactams(Extended-spectrum) β-lactamase blaTEM
blaCTX-M group 1/2/8/9
blaPER1
blaSHV
CarbapenemaseblaKPC-2/3
blaVIM
blaNDM-1/2
Other β-lactamaseblaCMY-1/2/3
PhenicolsChloramphenicol exporterfloR
FluoroquinolonesQuinolone resistance proteinqnrA, qnrB1, qnrS
PolymyxinsPhosphoethanolamine transferasemcr-1/2/3/4/5/9
Folate pathway antagonistsSulfonamide resistant dihydro-pteroate synthase
Dihydrofolate reductase		sul1/2/3
dfrA1/12/17
TetracyclinesTetracycline efflux pumptetA/B
Table
Table 2. Mobile genetic elements (MGEs) selected for the AMR–Array design.
Table 2. Mobile genetic elements (MGEs) selected for the AMR–Array design.
MGE FamilyMGE NameAMR Genes Previously Reported with MGE
Plasmid incompatibility repliconsIncA/C, IncFIA, IncFIB, IncFII, IncX4, IncHI1, IncHI2, IncL/M, IncN, IncQ, IncR, Incl, IncK/B/O/Z,blaCMY, blaCTX-M, blaNDM, blaSHV, blaTEM, blaVIM, aac/aph/ant, armA, dfrA, qnr, floR, sul1/2/3, tetA/B, mcr1
ISIS26blaOXA-1, blaNDM, blaSHV-2, blaKPC, qnrB, mcr-1
IS903disruption of mgrB (colistin efflux), blaCTX-M
IS4321blaIMP
IS6100blaTEM, mphA
ISAba24/125armA, strA/B, tetB, blaNDM
ISKpn14/26disruption of mgrB (colistin efflux), mcr-1
ISKpn19/27blaKPC-2
ISApl1mcr-1
ISEc33blaKPC, blaNDM
ISEcp1blaCTX-M
ISSEn4blaNDM-1
ISCRISCR1blaCMY, blaPER, blaCTX-M, qnrA, qnrVC
ISCR3/14/27blaVIM, blaNDM
Tn2blaTEM
IntegronsintI1aminoglycosides, β-lactams, phenicols, and macrolides
intI2dfr1
intI3blaIMP-1, aacA4, blaGES
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Delannoy, S.; Hoffer, C.; Youf, R.; Dauvergne, E.; Webb, H.E.; Brauge, T.; Tran, M.-L.; Midelet, G.; Granier, S.A.; Haenni, M.; et al. High Throughput Screening of Antimicrobial Resistance Genes in Gram-Negative Seafood Bacteria. Microorganisms 2022, 10, 1225. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10061225

AMA Style

Delannoy S, Hoffer C, Youf R, Dauvergne E, Webb HE, Brauge T, Tran M-L, Midelet G, Granier SA, Haenni M, et al. High Throughput Screening of Antimicrobial Resistance Genes in Gram-Negative Seafood Bacteria. Microorganisms. 2022; 10(6):1225. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10061225

Chicago/Turabian Style

Delannoy, Sabine, Corine Hoffer, Raphaëlle Youf, Emilie Dauvergne, Hattie E. Webb, Thomas Brauge, Mai-Lan Tran, Graziella Midelet, Sophie A. Granier, Marisa Haenni, and et al. 2022. "High Throughput Screening of Antimicrobial Resistance Genes in Gram-Negative Seafood Bacteria" Microorganisms 10, no. 6: 1225. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10061225

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop