Skip Content
You are currently on the new version of our website. Access the old version .
ActuatorsActuators
  • This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
  • Article
  • Open Access

30 January 2026

Pressure-Dependent Hysteresis in a Spring–Rod Compact Pneumatic Artificial Muscle Compared with a Commercial McKibben Actuator

,
and
Department of Mechatronics and Automation, Faculty of Engineering, University of Szeged, 6725 Szeged, Hungary
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
This article belongs to the Special Issue Advanced Actuation, Intelligent Sensor and Precise Manipulation Technology in Human–Robot Interaction—2nd Edition

Abstract

This paper introduces a compact pneumatic artificial muscle (CPAM) that integrates a coaxial rod and an internal helical compression spring (stiffness 9750 N/m) into a McKibben-type outer muscle and compares it to a commercial DMSP-20-200N from FESTO Budapest, Hungary, with identical outer geometry and materials. Both actuators were mounted in a force-controlled test rig, pre-tensioned, and then cycled quasi-statically between their stretched and maximally contracted states at 13 internal pressures. For each pressure, median loading and unloading force–contraction curves were obtained from five repeats measuring both the cylinder excitation force and a load cell, and hysteresis was quantified by a normalized loop area based on peak force and common contraction range. Under the rated load of 2000 N at 0.6 MPa, the CPAM elongates less (−1.5% vs. −3%) and generates higher forces over most of the contraction range. The normalized hysteresis index of the CPAM is markedly lower at low pressures (≈0.05–0.25 MPa, reductions of about 10–25%), similar near 0.30 MPa, and slightly higher at 0.35–0.60 MPa (≈6–14%).

Article Metrics

Citations

Article Access Statistics

Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.