Next Article in Journal
Commensal Rodents: Still a Current Threat
Next Article in Special Issue
Tuberculosis Infection in Children and Adolescents
Previous Article in Journal
Isolation and Characterization of Chi-like Salmonella Bacteriophages Infecting Two Salmonella enterica Serovars, Typhimurium and Enteritidis
Previous Article in Special Issue
High Throughput Sequencing for Clinical Tuberculosis: An Overview
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Pathogens
Volume 11
Issue 12
10.3390/pathogens11121481
pathogens-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Tuberculosis Infection in Pregnant People: Current Practices and Research Priorities

by
Jyoti S. Mathad
1,2,*,
Sharan Yadav
1,
Arthi Vaidyanathan
1,
Amita Gupta
3 and
Sylvia M. LaCourse
4,*
1
Department of Medicine, Center for Global Health, Weill Cornell Medicine/New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY 10065, USA
2
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY 10065, USA
3
Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
4
Departments of Medicine, Global Health, and Epidemiology, Division of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98104, USA
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Pathogens 2022, 11(12), 1481; https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens11121481
Submission received: 1 November 2022 / Revised: 30 November 2022 / Accepted: 1 December 2022 / Published: 6 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Mycobacterium tuberculosis Infection: Policy Gaps and Research Breakthroughs)
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Women are significantly more likely to develop tuberculosis (TB) disease within the first 90 days after pregnancy than any other time in their lives. Whether pregnancy increases risk of progression from TB infection (TBI) to TB disease is unknown and is an active area of investigation. In this review, we discuss the epidemiology of TB and TBI in pregnancy, TBI diagnostics, and prevalence in pregnancy. We also review TBI treatment and highlight research priorities, such as short-course TB prevention regimens, drug-resistant TB prevention, and additional considerations for safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics that are unique to pregnant and postpartum people.

1. Introduction

Of the 10 million new tuberculosis (TB) diagnoses each year, one third are in women [1]. Most TB diagnoses in women occur between the ages of 15 and 49 years, which overlaps with years typically associated with reproductive potential [2]. However, epidemiologic data about TB disease during pregnancy are not routinely collected. In the absence of systematically collected data, global modeling studies estimate 200,000 incident TB diagnoses during pregnancy each year [3].
Whether pregnancy increases risk of progression from TB infection (TBI) (a state of persistent immune response to stimulation by Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) antigens without evidence of clinically active TB) [4] to TB disease is unknown [5]. Large epidemiologic studies suggest women are significantly more likely to develop TB disease within the first 90 days after pregnancy than any other time in their lives [6,7]. A United Kingdom study followed 192,000 people who became pregnant with a TB incidence rate ratio of 1.95 (95% CI 1.24–3.07) postpartum compared to nonpregnant times [6]. Similarly, a large study in Sweden reviewed 649,000 medical records of women in their reproductive years and found increased incidence of TB during pregnancy (IRR 1.4, 95% CI 1.1–1.7) and within 6 months postpartum (IRR 1.9, 95% CI 1.5–2.5) compared to nonpregnant periods [7]. In studies of women with HIV prior to and since widespread antiretroviral therapy (ART), even higher postpartum TB incidence and mortality are reported [8,9].
It is critical to prevent TB disease during pregnancy. Maternal TB disease is associated with poor outcomes including miscarriage, pre-eclampsia/eclampsia, low birthweight, premature birth, and mortality, in addition to TB transmission to the infant and family [10]. These outcomes are exacerbated by HIV, even in the setting of widespread ART [11], and lack of access or delay in accessing health care. Malnutrition, alcohol or tobacco abuse, and diabetes may also contribute to poor TB outcomes during pregnancy, as they do in non-pregnant populations, but there are limited data on these risk factors in pregnant people.

2. Epidemiology of TB Infection in Pregnancy

One fourth of the global population is estimated to have TBI [12]. Inconsistent screening and lack of an established gold-standard of TBI testing in pregnancy prevent accurate estimates [10]. Table 1 summarizes studies of TBI prevalence in pregnant people from high- and low-burden settings.

2.1. High-Burden Settings

In high-burden settings, most studies report TBI prevalence in pregnancy between 30 and 34%, including for people with HIV [8,9,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24]. TBI detected through tuberculin skin testing (TST) ranges from 4.6 to 35.6% and from 18.9 to 37.8% [8,9,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24] using interferon gamma release assays (IGRA) (Table 1).

2.2. Low-Burden Settings

In low-burden TB settings, estimated TBI prevalence is expectedly lower, with a median of 15% by TST (range 4.2–50%) and 11.4% by IGRA (range 2–22%) [25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37]. Studies reporting TBI prevalence >25% in pregnancy in low-burden settings are usually conducted in higher-risk populations, such as pregnant people from high-burden TB settings (Table 1) [10,29].
Table
Table 1. TBI prevalence and diagnostics.
Table 1. TBI prevalence and diagnostics.
High-Burden Regions
Authors and DateStudy LocationPurposeResearch
Design		N% HIV, Median CD4PrevalenceFindings
TST, %IGRA, %
Weinberg et al., 2021 [13] Botswana, Haiti, India, South
Africa, Tanzania, Thailand, Uganda, Zimbabwe 		Determine the
effect of pregnancy stage and IPT on IGRA and TST 		Randomized, double blinded, placebo controlled trial 944 100;
Median CD4: 521 		30 a From pregnancy to delivery, 24% of IGRA-positive women reverted to IGRA-negative or indeterminate; 62% became IGRA positive again postpartum. Loss of IGRA positivity during pregnancy explained by decreased IFN-γ production and IPT. TST less affected by pregnancy but had lower positivity compared to IGRA at all time points.
König Walles et al., 2018 [14] Ethiopia Determine diagnostic yield of TB2 and the agreement between TB1 and TB2 results in pregnant people tested with QFT-Plus. Prospective
cohort 		829 5.9;
Median CD4 range: 400–799 		33 a High agreement between QFT-Plus results elicited by TB1 and TB2 antigen formulations, including in WHIV. IFN-γ responses among HIV-positive women were significantly lower than those in HIV-negative persons, suggesting that a lower cutoff might be considered to define positive QFT-Plus results for HIV-positive pregnant women.
Birku et al., 2020 [15] Ethiopia Effect of pregnancy and HIV infection on performance of TST and IGRA Cross-sectional 159 54;
Median CD4: 384 		HIV−: 35.6, HIV+: 20.9 HIV−: 31.5 a, HIV+: 18.9 a HIV infection reduces rate of detection of TBI by TST and IGRA during pregnancy. Concordance between TST and IGRA increased w/pregnancy and/or HIV infection; overall agreement 92.4%, κ = 0.82.
Walles et al., 2021 [16] Ethiopia Study TB exposure patterns in women of reproductive age Prospective
cohort 		2088 9.3;
Median CD4 range: 350–599 		33 a TBI associated with age and HIV infection. Without HIV, absolute annual risk of acquiring TB infection was 2.1%.
Tesfaye et al., 2021 [17] Ethiopia Compare Mtb-triggered IFN-γ levels longitudinally in pregnant and postpartum women Prospective cohort 363 0 22 a Mtb-stimulated IFN-γ responses were higher during 3rd trimester than earlier stages of pregnancy and postpartum, despite decreased mitogen-triggered responses.
Gupta et al., 2007 [9] India Determine the incidence of active TB in postpartum WHIV Prospective
cohort 		688 100;
Median CD4: 465 		21 TB incidence was 5 cases per 100 person-years. Predictors of incident TB included CD4 count <200, HIV viral load <50,000 copies/mL, and positive TST. Women with incident TB and their infants had a 2.2- and 3.4-fold increased probability of death, respectively.
Mathad et al., 2014 [18] India Examine how pregnancy impacts the performance of TBI diagnostics Cross-sectional + longitudinal cohort 401 0 14 37 a Agreement 76%, κ = 0.37. Pregnancy stage affected both IGRA and TST, but IGRA was more sensitive and stable. Median IFN-γ concentration lowest at delivery and highest postpartum.
Mathad et al., 2016 [19] India Performance of TBI tests in pregnant and postpartum WHIV, investigate the immunology behind discordance Cross-sectional + longitudinal cohort 252 100;
Median CD4: 468 		10 28 a Agreement 75%, κ = 0.25 QGIT was more stable and likely more accurate than TST. Pregnant women with IGRA+/TST− discordance had less IFN-γ and IL-2 than those with concordant-positive results and may represent a high-risk subset for the development of active TB postpartum.
Bhosale et al., 2021 [20] India Compare performance of TBI tests over time in pregnant people with and without HIV Prospective cohort study of IGRA+ pregnant people 165 21;
Median CD4: 476 		Pregnancy affects TBI test results and reduces IFN-γ response to Mtb stimulation. IGRA/TST discordance high in pregnant women (HIV+: 51%; HIV−: 25%). Despite adequate CD4 counts, WHIV express less IFN-γ than women without HIV.
Jonnalagadda et al., 2010 [8] Kenya Estimate sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value of IFN-γ and CD4 for postpartum TB Cohort 333 100;
Median CD4: 440 		36 b Positive IGRA results for pregnant WHIV were associated with postpartum active TB (aHRCD4, 4.5; 95% CI 1.1–18.0).
LaCourse et al., 2017 [21] Kenya Determine the effect of peripartum stage on TST and IGRA Prospective
cohort 		100 100;
Median CD4: 555 		13.5 35.4 b Low agreement between QFT and TST (κ = 0.20); QFT identified >2-fold more women with TBI compared to TST in pregnancy and postpartum. Lower QFT Mtb-Ag and mitogen responses in pregnancy compared to postpartum.
Kaplan et al., 2022 [22] Kenya Estimate TBI prevalence and effect of HIV on diagnostic performance of IGRA versus TST Cross-sectional 400 50;
Median CD4: 464 		HIV–: 4.6 HIV+: 18.5 HIV–:33.2 a, HIV+: 31.5 a QFT-Plus identified 3-fold more women with TBI compared with TST. Difference further amplified when increasing TST cutoffs to ≥10 mm for both WLHIV- and HIV-negative women. QFT-Plus positivity prevalence was similar regardless of HIV status, although TB-specific antigen responses lower with HIV.
Sheriff et al., 2010 [23] Tanzania Prevalence of TBI in pregnancy Cross-sectional 286 4.5 14.5 TBI prevalence 26.2–37.4%. Certain ethnic groups were less vulnerable to TBI compared to others. Age, parity, HIV status, BMI did not affect TST results.
Bongomin et al., 2021 [24] Uganda TBI prevalence and risk factors among pregnant women Cross-sectional 261 5 37.8 a HIV infection and ages 30–39 were independently associated with TBI (OR 4.4, p = 0.04, and OR 4.0, p = 0.02, respectively).
Low-Burden Regions
Authors
and Date		Study LocationPurposeResearch
Design		NHIV Status, Mean CD4PrevalenceFindings
TST, %IGRA, %
Fröberg et al., 2020 [25] Sweden To evaluate the newly introduced TB screening program among pregnant women in Stockholm in 2016–2017. Retrospective, observational study ~2000 0.2 22 a TBI treatment among all QFT-positive pregnant women increased from 24% to 37%. Treatment completion (mainly rifampicin) postpartum was 94%. No WHIV were treated for TBI. Nine HIV-negative active pulmonary TB cases were detected (incidence: 215/100,000). None had been screened for TB prior to pregnancy.
Present, Comstock 1975 [26] USA To determine if pregnancy affects TST sensitivity Case-control study 452 Not
Reported 		No indication that pregnancy affects the level of TST sensitivity.
Covelli, Wilson 1987 [27] USA To assess changes in cell-mediated immunity in pregnancy Cohort study 172 Not
Reported 		12.2 Progressive depression of lymphocyte response to TST, from 36 weeks’ gestation through delivery. Nonspecific cell-mediated immunity was maintained.
Mofenson et al., 1995 [28] USA Prevalence of TBI and anergy among pregnant and non-pregnant WHIV Prospective study 46 100;
Mean CD4: 530 		11 Prevalence of anergy was higher in nonpregnant vs. pregnant women (42% vs. 38%).
Medchill 1999 [29] USA To evaluate a TST program in an obstetric clinic Retrospective chart review 1497 0 15 TST positivity was 15.2%: 1.3% of Asian, 23.9% of Hispanic, 9.3% of black, and 4.1% of white patients. Hispanic patients had a relative risk for positive TST of 5.9 compared with white patients.
Jackson 2001 [30] USA Prevalence of anergy in pregnant versus nonpregnant women Case-control 60 0 10 Pregnant women were less likely to have a reaction to tetanus toxoid than nonpregnant women (10% vs. 40%; p < 0.02). Otherwise, no difference in anergy between pregnant and non-pregnant.
Schulte et al., 2002 [31] USA To determine the number of pregnant WHIV that completed TST Retrospective chart review 176 100 26 A total of 85% of women completed TST; 21% had positive TSTs, and 1% had active TB disease
Cruz et al., 2005 [32] USA To investigate rates and predictors for follow up and treatment among postpartum women with positive TST Retrospective cohort 1131 0 32 Only 18% of patients with positive PPD completed 6 months of therapy. Those who received care from the same physician antepartum and postpartum were more likely to attend and complete therapy (67% (p < 0.01) and 62% (p = 0.1), respectively)
Schwartz et al., 2009 [33] USA To review compliance and utility of universal TB screening among pregnant women Retrospective data review 3847 0 50 A total of 95% of patients were compliant with TST testing; 50.4% had positive PPD results, of which 95.1% completed chest X-rays.
Chehab et al., 2010 [34] USA To assess the consistency of TST and QFT testing among pregnant and non- pregnant women Case-control 152 0 10 7 a Overall concordant results: agreement 86.2% (κ = 0.288). More discordant results in non-pregnant women (24% vs. 8.8%; p < 0.022); most commonly TST+/QFT-ve.
Worjoloh et al., 2011 [35] USA To estimate agreement between TST and IGRA in pregnant women. Cross-sectional 199 0 23 14 a Poor concordance and agreement between TST and IGRA (77.3%, κ = 0.26). Most common discordance: TST+/QFT−. No association between gestational age and IGRA positivity or discordant results. Changing IGRA cutoff did not improve agreement.
Lighter-Fisher & Surette et al., 2012 [36] USA To evaluate IGRA for TBI in pregnant adolescents and high-risk women Prospective 280 Not
Reported 		21 11.4 a IGRA associated with greater likelihood of exposure to Mtb. IFN-γ did not have any temporal association with pregnancy stage. Agreement between QFT and TST in pregnant women = 88%, κ = 0.452.
Molina et al., 2016 [37] USA Completion rates and concordance between IGRA and TST in pregnancy Observational cohort 141 2.8 4.2 2 b IGRA had a higher completion rate than TST (98% vs. 63%) while maintaining high concordance (96.3%).
a QuantiFERON-TB Gold or QFT-Plus, b T-Spot.TB; Abbreviations: IPT = Isoniazid preventative therapy; IRGA = Interferon gamma release assays; TST= Tuberculin skin test; QFT = QuantiFERON; WHIV = Women with HIV; QGIT = QuantiFERON-Gold-in-tube; PPD = Purified protein derivative (form of TST).

3. Natural History of TB in Pregnancy

Few studies specifically assess how the immunologic changes of pregnancy affect TB risk. During pregnancy, cells associated with cell-mediated immunity (e.g., CD4+/CD8+-T cells) decrease while other cells that dampen the immune response (e.g., Treg) increase in frequency [38]. Some data suggest CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell function is also decreased during pregnancy [39]. The relative immune suppression associated with pregnancy progresses until a nadir at delivery [38]. These subtle changes increase the risk of certain infections (e.g., Listeria) and severity of other infections (e.g., influenza). There are no definitive studies on how these changes specifically affect susceptibility to Mtb.
Studies from both Kenya and India document a decrease in quantitative interferon gamma (IFN-γ) produced after ex vivo stimulation with Mtb-specific antigens of samples during pregnancy versus postpartum [18,19,20,21]. Similar patterns are seen in pregnant people with and without HIV, although people with HIV have lower IFN-γ production at all stages of pregnancy, despite adequate CD4+ T-cell counts [20,22]. A Mtb-specific CD4+ polyfunctional response was also decreased in late pregnancy among women in Kenya and Uganda with and without HIV [40]. Interestingly, a study from India reported that pregnant people with gestational diabetes (GDM) had an impaired IFN-γ response to Mtb-specific antigens; the impairment was highest in pregnant people with GDM and HIV [41]. These data suggest that impairment of cell-mediated immunity during pregnancy may be exacerbated by comorbidities such as HIV and GDM and may allow TBI to progress to disease. Further research on the intersection of GDM, HIV, and TB in pregnant people are warranted.

4. TB Infection Diagnostics

TBI screening is recommended for pregnant people with HIV, other immunosuppression (e.g., chronic steroid use, TNF-alpha inhibitors, cancer, and/or chemotherapy), or recent contact with someone with pulmonary TB disease [42,43]. Currently available tests to detect TBI include IGRA and TST; both are safe in pregnancy.
Both IGRA and TST rely on a functioning cell-mediated immune system, which is affected by pregnancy. Currently, there are no guidelines suggesting modification of TST cutoffs based on pregnancy alone. Two studies conducted in the United States noted no significant effect of pregnancy status or stage on TST results, with similar rates of cutaneous anergy among pregnant and non-pregnant people with HIV [30]. However, studies in TB-endemic regions showed a decreased TST response during pregnancy versus postpartum [13,18,21,22].
Numerous studies have been performed comparing performance of IGRA and TST in pregnant and postpartum people. In low-TB-prevalence regions, most studies report moderate concordance [20,44,45,46]. IGRA has increased completion rates [16] and may have higher specificity [13,16,36], particularly in people with prior BCG vaccination [25], compared to TST. In high-TB-burden regions, data on concordance between IGRA and TST are mixed. Most studies report mild to moderate agreement and concordance [14,15,17,20,21]. The most common type of discordance is IGRA+/TST− [14,15,17,20,21]. IGRA+/TST− discordance may occur because TST requires multiple cytokines to increase to trigger induration versus the IGRA, which is based only on IFN-γ levels. Test performances also fluctuate with gestational age [13,17,18,19,21] and HIV status [20,22]. One study found that pregnant women with HIV and IGRA+/TST− discordance had lower IFN-γ and IL-2 in response to Mtb-specific antigens compared to IGRA+/TST+ results. Furthermore, the majority of women who developed TB disease postpartum had IGRA+/TST− results during pregnancy, suggesting that discordance, itself, may predict disease [19]. Larger studies are needed.
The nadir of positivity for both tests is at delivery, coinciding with the nadir of measured IFN-γ levels, with highest positivity noted in the postpartum period [13,17,18,19,20,21]. This may explain the high incidence of IGRA reversion from positive to negative or indeterminate at delivery, with conversion back to positive tests postpartum [13,17,18,19,20,21].

Pregnant People with HIV

IGRA positivity has been shown to be 2–3 times higher than TST positivity at every stage of pregnancy including postpartum among women with and without HIV [18,19,21,22]. Compared to pregnant people without HIV, IFN-γ levels are lower among pregnant people with HIV, despite being on ARTs with adequate CD4+ T-cell counts [20,22]. A functional impairment in the ability of Mtb-specific CD4 T-cells to produce IFN-γ, even with chronic ART [47], may explain lower TST and IGRA positivity in these populations [20,22].
Larger studies are needed to determine the optimal type and timing of TBI testing during pregnancy. Until then, all pregnant people with a positive IGRA or TST should be assessed for TB disease, which can include a symptom screen and sputum sample for molecular testing and/or a Mtb culture. A chest radiograph with an abdominal shield is safe for the fetus and should be performed whenever thoracic TB disease is suspected [48]. If there is no evidence of TB disease, then women with TBI should be managed as discussed below.

5. TB Infection Treatment

Until recently, there were no systematic evaluations of TB preventive therapy in pregnant people. While efficacy is presumed to be similar, there are additional considerations for safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics in pregnant compared to nonpregnant people.
Recommended TBI regimens in pregnancy are reviewed in Table 2. Both the World Health Organization (WHO) and the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommend isoniazid (6 or 9 months (6H or 9H)) as the preferred TB preventive therapy for pregnant people with HIV [4,43]. The WHO further recommends that 36 months of isoniazid be used for people in high-burden areas. The US CDC also includes rifampin daily for 4 months (4R) or 3 months daily isoniazid and rifampin (3HR) as alternative TBI regimens during pregnancy [49,50]. Some experts prefer 4R to avoid hepatotoxicity associated with isoniazid, while others prefer isoniazid to avoid drug-drug interactions with rifampin, such as with some antiretroviral medications.
TBI treatment recommendations during pregnancy are primarily based on safety and efficacy data on nonpregnant populations [51]. Of the currently recommended regimens, only 6H has been evaluated specifically in pregnant people in a randomized control trial. TB APPRISE evaluated the safety of 6H given during pregnancy (immediate arm) or 12 weeks after delivery (deferred arm) [52]. While maternal adverse events (or permanent discontinuation due to toxic effects) (15.03 vs. 14.93 events/100 person-years) and TB incidence (0.60 vs. 0.59/100 person-years) were similar between arms, the immediate arm had a higher risk of composite adverse pregnancy outcome (stillbirth or spontaneous abortion, low birth weight, preterm delivery, or congenital anomalies) compared to the deferred arm (23.6% vs. 17.0%, respectively; 6.7% difference (95% CI 0.8–11.9%).
In contrast, two observational studies of isoniazid given to pregnant women with HIV in programmatic settings in South Africa did not find an association of isoniazid with adverse pregnancy outcomes [11,53]. Similarly, participants who became pregnant in the BOTUSA trial (36 months of isoniazid for people with HIV) in Botswana did not have increased adverse pregnancy outcomes [54]. A subsequent systematic review confirmed the inconsistent associations between isoniazid and adverse pregnancy outcomes, including hepatotoxicity, among pregnant people with HIV [55]. A meta-analysis focusing on individual data from clinical trials of pregnant participants with HIV and receiving TB preventive therapy is ongoing.

Breastfeeding Considerations

The low concentrations of isoniazid and rifampin in breastmilk are considered safe for infants [56] but not therapeutic. If the infant is in contact with a person with pulmonary TB disease, the infant should be dosed for TB prevention. Rifampin (and rifamycins in general) can cause red-orange coloration of body fluids, including breastmilk, which is not harmful to the lactating parent or infant.

6. Newer Short-Course TB Treatment Regimens in Pregnant People

Newer short-course rifapentine-based regimens, including isoniazid and rifapentine weekly for 3 months (3HP) and daily for 1 month (1HP), are not currently recommended for people who are pregnant or anticipating to become pregnant during TBI treatment due to lack of safety data [1,2,3]. IMPAACT 2001, a phase I/II trial, evaluated the pharmacokinetics and safety of 3HP during pregnancy [57]. Of 50 participants, 20 had HIV and were taking efavirenz-based ART. Despite lower rifapentine clearance during pregnancy vs. postpartum in women without HIV, and higher clearance in women with HIV vs. without HIV during pregnancy, all women met target exposures of rifapentine and isoniazid associated with successful TB prevention in non-pregnant cohorts. This study was not powered for safety, but there were no major drug-related safety issues identified. Similarly, data from 87 participants who became pregnant during the PREVENT TB and iAdhere trials, which evaluated 3HP versus 9H in non-pregnant people, found that fetal loss and congenital anomalies were comparable among participants exposed to 3HP (n = 31) and 9H (n = 56) [58]. Moreover, the adverse events were similar to general rates in the United States. Taken together, these findings support that 3HP does not require a dose adjustment and is tolerable in pregnant people without HIV or those with HIV on efavirenz-based ART. Larger studies to assess 3HP safety in pregnant people on dolutegravir-based ART are planned.
There are no data on 1HP in pregnant people. The BRIEF TB trial demonstrated 1HP is non-inferior to 9H in people with HIV, with a similar safety profile and higher level of adherence [59]. Pregnant women were excluded from this study, and no women became pregnant while taking 1HP. In the 9H arm, however, 136 women became pregnant, and there was an increase in composite adverse pregnancy outcomes in participants exposed to 9H in the first trimester [60].
In most trials of rifapentine-based TB preventive therapy in people with HIV, participants were on efavirenz-based regimens [59,61]. Currently, dolutegravir-based regimens are first-line, including for people who are pregnant and planning to conceive [62]. There are legitimate concerns about using rifapentine with dolutegravir because rifapentine induces enzymes which can decrease dolutegravir concentrations [63]. Moreover, pregnancy alone is associated with decreased dolutegravir concentrations [64]. So far, dose adjustments are not required for non-pregnant people on dolutegravir with 3HP nor for pregnant people on dolutegravir alone [63,64]. However, ACTG study A5372 found that doubling dolutegravir to twice-daily allowed adequate dolutegravir levels in people with HIV taking 1HP [65]. There are no data for pregnant people on dolutegravir and 3HP or 1HP.
DOLPHIN-Moms is a prospective randomized trial that will study the safety of 1HP and 3HP taken with dolutegravir in pregnant people with HIV [66]. Moreover, it will also determine if twice-daily dolutegravir is required to maintain adequate levels when administered with 1HP or 3HP during pregnancy. If shown to be safe, the shorter duration of rifapentine-containing regimens could make them ideal for use in pregnancy because they can be completed during the antenatal period, when regular interaction with the healthcare system is common, and potentially avoid postpartum hepatotoxicity.
Studies evaluating issues of TBI treatment in pregnant people primarily focus on isoniazid and are summarized in Table 3.

7. Timing of TBI Treatment in Pregnancy

The indication and timing of TBI treatment differ in high- and low-burden settings depending on HIV status [4,51,74]. Generally, in low-burden settings, TBI treatment is targeted to pregnant people with a positive IGRA or TST. US guidelines note that TBI treatment can be delayed until 2–3 months post-partum for people at lower risk of TB progression. If a person has had recent exposure to someone with infectious TB (or recent TBI test conversion), however, TBI treatment should be initiated immediately, even during the first trimester of pregnancy [51,74]. For pregnant people with HIV, US guidelines also recommend treatment deferral until after delivery if there are no close contacts with infectious TB [74]. In contrast, the WHO recommends that TB preventive therapy be given immediately to pregnant people with HIV living in high-burden settings (irrespective of recent contact), acknowledging that systematic postpartum deferral misses the point when they are most vulnerable to TB [4].
Key considerations for the timing of TBI treatment in pregnancy include immunologic changes of pregnancy that may affect TB susceptibility, potential teratogenicity of medications during early fetal development, physiologic changes that affect the pharmacokinetics, and the risk of hepatotoxicity in late pregnancy and early postpartum.

8. MDR Prevention in Pregnant People

People exposed to drug-resistant TB (DR-TB) have a high risk of developing DR-TB. A meta-analysis reported 47% of DR-TB household contacts developed TBI [75]. The risk is higher in young children and may be higher during pregnancy [76]. Prevention of DR-TB is especially important in pregnant people because there are no internationally accepted regimens for DR-TB treatment in pregnancy [77].
Currently, the WHO and US CDC recommend Levofloxacin for 6–12 months in non-pregnant DR-TB household contacts. There are no recommendations for DR-TB prevention during pregnancy nor are there currently any planned DR-TB prevention trials that include pregnant people.

9. Research Priorities

Biomarkers of Progression from TB Infection to Disease

A biomarker for TB progression in pregnant or non-pregnant populations remains elusive. Multiple studies have been conducted to identify a transcriptional profile that accurately predicts TB progression in non-pregnant people but have all excluded pregnant people. Because of the immune changes of pregnancy, biomarkers for TB progression may be different than those in non-pregnant populations. A small transcriptional study in India identified a gene set associated with glutathione metabolism that predicted TB progression in pregnant women; it remains unknown if the signature will be validated in other pregnant cohorts. In Kenya and Uganda, nonspecific T-cell activation, a biomarker for TB disease development [78], increased from pregnancy to postpartum in women with TBI compared to without TB; this change did not necessarily predict TB disease [40].
Taken together, these data suggest immune changes of pregnancy may impair robust immune responses to Mtb, impacting progression from TB infection to disease through novel immune pathways. More definitive immunologic studies are needed.

10. Conclusions

Incorporating pregnancy and postpartum status into routine surveillance data can improve our understanding of TBI prevalence, TB risk, and outcomes. Other major gaps include whether pregnancy-related immunologic changes affect susceptibility of progression to TB disease and the identification of an immune correlate of TB risk. Optimal timing of TBI treatment must take into account the risk of TB progression as well as safety considerations unique to pregnancy. Identifying the safest regimens for TBI treatment for both drug-sensitive and drug-resistant TB, including for people with HIV, requires inclusion of pregnant people in TB prevention trials.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.S.M., A.G. and S.M.L.; methodology, J.S.M. and S.M.L.; data curation, J.S.M., S.Y., A.V. and S.M.L.; writing—original draft preparation, J.S.M., S.Y., A.V. and S.M.L.; writing—review and editing, J.S.M., S.Y., A.V., A.G. and S.M.L.; supervision, J.S.M., S.M.L. and A.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Global Tuberculosis Report 2022. Available online: https://www.who.int/publications/digital/global-tuberculosis-report-2021 (accessed on 28 October 2022).
  2. DeLuca, A.; Chaisson, R.E.; Martinson, N.A. Intensified Case Finding for Tuberculosis in Prevention of Mother-to-Child Transmission Programs: A Simple and Potentially Vital Addition for Maternal and Child Health. J. Acquir. Immune Defic. Syndr. 2009, 50, 196–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Sugarman, J.; Colvin, C.; Moran, A.C.; Oxlade, O. Tuberculosis in pregnancy: An estimate of the global burden of disease. Lancet Glob. Health 2014, 2, e710–e716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. World Health Organization. WHO Consolidated Guidelines on Tuberculosis: Module 1: Prevention: Tuberculosis Preventive Treatment; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2020. Available online: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/331170 (accessed on 28 December 2021).
  5. Miele, K.; Morris, S.B.; Tepper, N.K. Tuberculosis in Pregnancy. Obstet. Gynecol. 2020, 135, 1444–1453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Zenner, D.; Kruijshaar, M.E.; Andrews, N.; Abubakar, I. Risk of tuberculosis in pregnancy: A national, primary care-based cohort and self-controlled case series study. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2012, 185, 779–784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Jonsson, J.; Kühlmann-Berenzon, S.; Berggren, I.; Bruchfeld, J. Increased risk of active tuberculosis during pregnancy and postpartum: A register-based cohort study in Sweden. Eur. Respir. J. 2020, 55, 1901886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Jonnalagadda, S.; Payne, B.L.; Brown, E.; Wamalwa, D.; Obimbo, E.M.; Majiwa, M.; Farquhar, C.; Otieno, P.; Mbori-Ngacha, D.; John-Stewart, G. Latent tuberculosis detection by interferon γ release assay during pregnancy predicts active tuberculosis and mortality in human immunodeficiency virus type 1-infected women and their children. J. Infect. Dis. 2010, 202, 1826–1835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Gupta, A.; Nayak, U.; Ramesh, B.; Bhosale, R.; Patil, S.; Basavraj, A.; Kakrani, A.; Philip, S.; Desai, D.; Sastry, J.; et al. Postpartum tuberculosis incidence and mortality among HIV-infected women and their infants in Pune, India, 2002–2005. Clin. Infect. Dis. Off. Publ. Infect. Dis. Soc. Am. 2007, 45, 241–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Mathad, J.S.; Gupta, A. Tuberculosis in pregnant and postpartum women: Epidemiology, management, and research gaps. Clin. Infect. Dis. Off. Publ. Infect. Dis. Soc. Am. 2012, 55, 1532–1549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Salazar-Austin, N.; Hoffmann, J.; Cohn, S.; Mashabela, F.; Waja, Z.; Lala, S.; Hoffmann, C.; E Dooley, K.; E Chaisson, R.; Martinson, N.; et al. Poor Obstetric and Infant Outcomes in Human Immunodeficiency Virus-Infected Pregnant Women with Tuberculosis in South Africa: The Tshepiso Study. Clin. Infect. Dis. Off. Publ. Infect. Dis. Soc. Am. 2018, 66, 921–929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Cohen, A.; Mathiasen, V.D.; Schön, T.; Wejse, C. The global prevalence of latent tuberculosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur. Respir. J. 2019, 54, 1900655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Weinberg, A.; Aaron, L.; Montepiedra, G.; Sterling, T.R.; Browning, R.; Mmbaga, B.; Vhembo, T.; Naik, S.; Kabugho, E.; Masheto, G.; et al. Effects of Pregnancy and Isoniazid Preventive Therapy on Mycobacterium tuberculosis Interferon Gamma Response Assays in Women with HIV. Clin. Infect. Dis. Off. Publ. Infect. Dis. Soc. Am. 2021, 73, e3555–e3562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. König Walles, J.; Tesfaye, F.; Jansson, M.; Tolera Balcha, T.; Winqvist, N.; Kefeni, M.; Garoma Abeya, S.; Belachew, F.; Sturegård, E.; Björkman, P. Performance of QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus for detection of latent tuberculosis infection in pregnant women living in a tuberculosis- and HIV-endemic setting. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0193589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Birku, M.; Desalegn, G.; Kassa, G.; Tsegaye, A.; Abebe, M. Effect of pregnancy and HIV infection on detection of latent TB infection by Tuberculin Skin Test and QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube assay among women living in a high TB and HIV burden setting. IJID Off. Publ. Int. Soc. Infect. Dis. 2020, 101, 235–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Walles, J.; Tesfaye, F.; Jansson, M.; Balcha, T.T.; Sturegård, E.; Kefeni, M.; Merga, G.; Hansson, S.R.; Winqvist, N.; Björkman, P. Tuberculosis Infection in Women of Reproductive Age: A Cross-sectional Study at Antenatal Care Clinics in an Ethiopian City. Clin. Infect. Dis. Off. Publ. Infect. Dis. Soc. Am. 2021, 73, 203–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Tesfaye, F.; Walles, J.; Sturegård, E.; Winqvist, N.; Balcha, T.T.; Kefeni, M.; Jansson, M.; Björkman, P. Longitudinal Mycobacterium tuberculosis-Specific Interferon Gamma Responses in Ethiopian HIV-Negative Women during Pregnancy and Postpartum. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2021, 59, e0086821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Mathad, J.S.; Bhosale, R.; Sangar, V.; Mave, V.; Gupte, N.; Kanade, S.; Nangude, A.; Chopade, K.; Suryavanshi, N.; Deshpande, P.; et al. Pregnancy differentially impacts performance of latent tuberculosis diagnostics in a high-burden setting. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e92308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Mathad, J.S.; Bhosale, R.; Balasubramanian, U.; Kanade, S.; Mave, V.; Suryavanshi, N.; Gupte, N.; Joshi, S.; Chandanwale, A.; Dupnik, K.M.; et al. Quantitative IFN-γ and IL-2 Response Associated with Latent Tuberculosis Test Discordance in HIV-infected Pregnant Women. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2016, 193, 1421–1428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Bhosale, R.; Alexander, M.; Deshpande, P.; Kulkarni, V.; Gupte, N.; Gupta, A.; Mathad, J. Stages of pregnancy and HIV affect diagnosis of tuberculosis infection and Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB)-induced immune response: Findings from PRACHITi, a cohort study in Pune, India. IJID Off. Publ. Int. Soc. Infect. Dis. 2021, 112, 205–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. LaCourse, S.M.; Deya, R.W.; Graham, S.M.; Masese, L.N.; Jaoko, W.; Mandaliya, K.N.; Overbaugh, J.; McClelland, R.S. Evaluation of the Isoniazid Preventive Therapy Care Cascade Among HIV-Positive Female Sex Workers in Mombasa, Kenya. J. Acquir. Immune Defic. Syndr. 2017, 76, 74–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Kaplan, S.R.; Escudero, J.N.; Mecha, J.; Richardson, B.A.; Maleche-Obimbo, E.; Matemo, D.; Kinuthia, J.; John-Stewart, G.C.; LaCourse, S.M. Interferon Gamma Release Assay and Tuberculin Skin Test Performance in Pregnant Women Living with and without HIV. J. Acquir. Immune Defic. Syndr. 2022, 89, 98–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Sheriff, F.G.; Manji, K.P.; Manji, M.P.; Chagani, M.M.; Mpembeni, R.M.; Jusabani, A.M.; Alwani, Z.R.; Karimjee, T.S. Latent tuberculosis among pregnant mothers in a resource poor setting in Northern Tanzania: A cross-sectional study. BMC Infect. Dis. 2010, 10, 52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Bongomin, F.; Ssekamatte, P.; Nattabi, G.; Olum, R.; Ninsiima, S.; Kyazze, A.P.; Nabakka, W.; Kukunda, R.; Cose, S.; Kibirige, D.; et al. Latent Tuberculosis Infection Status of Pregnant Women in Uganda Determined Using QuantiFERON TB Gold-Plus. Open Forum Infect. Dis. 2021, 8, ofab241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Fröberg, G.; Jansson, L.; Nyberg, K.; Obasi, B.; Westling, K.; Berggren, I.; Bruchfeld, J. Screening and treatment of tuberculosis among pregnant women in Stockholm, Sweden, 2016–2017. Eur. Respir. J. 2020, 55, 1900851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Present, P.A.; Comstock, G.W. Tuberculin sensitivity in pregnancy. Am. Rev. Respir. Dis. 1975, 112, 413–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Covelli, H.D.; Wilson, R.T. Immunologic and medical considerations in tuberculin-sensitized pregnant patients. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 1978, 132, 256–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Mofenson, L.M.; Rodriguez, E.M.; Hershow, R.; Fox, H.E.; Landesman, S.; Tuomala, R.; Diaz, C.; Daniels, E.; Brambilla, D. Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection in pregnant and nonpregnant women infected with HIV in the Women and Infants Transmission Study. Arch. Intern. Med. 1995, 155, 1066–1072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Medchill, M.T. Prenatal purified protein derivative skin testing in a teaching clinic with a large Hispanic population. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 1999, 180, 1579–1583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Jackson, T.D.; Murtha, A.P. Anergy during pregnancy. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2001, 184, 1090–1092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Schulte, J.M.; Bryan, P.; Dodds, S.; Potter, M.; Onorato, I.M.; O’Sullivan, M.J. Tuberculosis skin testing among HIV-infected pregnant women in Miami, 1995 to 1996. J. Perinatol. Off. J. Calif. Perinat. Assoc. 2002, 22, 159–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Cruz, C.A.; Caughey, A.B.; Jasmer, R. Postpartum follow-up of a positive purified protein derivative (PPD) among an indigent population. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2005, 192, 1455–1457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Schwartz, N.; A Wagner, S.; Keeler, S.M.; Mierlak, J.; E Seubert, D.; Caughey, A.B. Universal Tuberculosis Screening in Pregnancy. Am. J. Perinatol. 2009, 26, 447–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Chehab, B.M.; Kallail, K.J.; O El Fakih, R.; E Zackula, R.; O Minns, G. Use of the QuantiFERON®-TB Gold Assay in Pregnant Patients. Kans. J. Med. 2010, 3, 24–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Worjoloh, A.; Kato-Maeda, M.; Osmond, D.; Freyre, R.; Aziz, N.; Cohan, D. Interferon Gamma Release Assay Compared with the Tuberculin Skin Test for Latent Tuberculosis Detection in Pregnancy. Obstet. Gynecol. 2011, 118, 1363–1370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Lighter-Fisher, J.; Surette, A.-M. Performance of an Interferon-Gamma Release Assay to Diagnose Latent Tuberculosis Infection During Pregnancy. Obstet. Gynecol. 2012, 119, 1088–1095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Molina, R.; Venkatesh, K.; Schantz-Dunn, J.; Meadows, A.; Nour, N.; Diouf, K. Comparing an Interferon Gamma Release Assay with the Tuberculin Skin Test during Pregnancy: Implications for Tuberculosis Screening during Prenatal Care. Matern. Child Health J. 2016, 20, 1314–1320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Kourtis, A.P.; Read, J.S.; Jamieson, D.J. Pregnancy and Infection. N. Engl. J. Med. 2014, 370, 2211–2218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Mathad, J.; Bhosale, R.; Alexander, M.; Kulkarni, V.; Kumar, P.; Andrade, B.; Gupta, A. Polyfunctional T-cells and IL-2 production decrease in pregnant women with latent TB. In Proceedings of the 51st World Conference on Lung Health of the International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease (The Union), 20–24 October 2020; TBScience E-poster EP-TBS-10. Available online: https://www.unaids.org/en/resources/presscentre/featurestories/2020/october/20201020_lung-health (accessed on 28 October 2022).
  40. Saha, A.; Escuduero, J.; Layouni, T.; Richardson, B.; Hou, S.; Mugo, N.; Mujugira, A.; Celum, C.; Baeten, J.M.; Lingappa, J.; et al. Mycobacterium tuberculosis-Specific T-Cell Responses Are Impaired During Late Pregnancy with Elevated Biomarkers of Tuberculosis Risk Postpartum. J. Infect. Dis. 2022, 225, 1663–1674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Chebrolu, P.; Alexander, M.; Bhosale, R.; Naik, S.; Gupte, N.; Lee, M.H.; Kumar, P.; Babu, S.; Fitzgerald, D.; Gupta, A.; et al. The Association of Gestational Diabetes with HIV Infection and Tuberculosis in Indian Women. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2022, 107, 569–572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. American Thoracic Society. Targeted tuberculin testing and treatment of latent tuberculosis infection. MMWR Recomm. Rep. Morb. Mortal. Wkly Rep. Recomm. Rep. 2000, 49, 1–51. [Google Scholar]
  43. Prevention and Treatment of Opportunistic Infections among Adults and Adolescents. Available online: https://www.idsociety.org/practice-guideline/prevention-and-treatment-of-opportunistic-infections-among-adults-and-adolescents/ (accessed on 28 October 2022).
  44. Kang, Y.A.; Lee, H.W.; Yoon, H.I.; Cho, B.; Han, S.K.; Shim, Y.-S.; Yim, J.-J. Discrepancy between the tuberculin skin test and the whole-blood interferon gamma assay for the diagnosis of latent tuberculosis infection in an intermediate tuberculosis-burden country. JAMA 2005, 293, 2756–2761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Mahomed, H.; Hughes, E.J.; Hawkridge, T.; Minnies, D.; Simon, E.; Little, F.; A Hanekom, W.; Geiter, L.; Hussey, G.D. Comparison of mantoux skin test with three generations of a whole blood IFN-gamma assay for tuberculosis infection. Int. J. Tuberc. Lung Dis. 2006, 10, 310–316. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  46. Lee, J.Y.; Choi, H.J.; Park, I.-N.; Hong, S.-B.; Oh, Y.-M.; Lim, C.-M.; Lee, S.D.; Koh, Y.; Kim, W.S.; Kim, D.S.; et al. Comparison of two commercial interferon-gamma assays for diagnosing Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection. Eur. Respir. J. 2006, 28, 24–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  47. Sutherland, R.; Yang, H.; Scriba, T.J.; Ondondo, B.; Robinson, N.; Conlon, C.; Suttill, A.; McShane, H.; Fidler, S.; McMichael, A.; et al. Impaired IFN-gamma-secreting capacity in mycobacterial antigen-specific CD4 T cells during chronic HIV-1 infection despite long-term HAART. AIDS Lond. Engl. 2006, 20, 821–829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Patel, S.M.; Lingam, R.K.; Beaconsfield, T.I.; Tran, T.L.; Brown, B. Role of radiology in the management of primary aldosteronism. Radiogr. Rev. Publ. Radiol. Soc. N. Am. Inc. 2007, 27, 1145–1157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. CDCTB. Tuberculosis (TB)–Treatment for TB Disease & Pregnancy. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Available online: https://www.cdc.gov/tb/topic/treatment/pregnancy.htm (accessed on 28 October 2022).
  50. Nahid, P.; Dorman, S.E.; Alipanah, N.; Barry, P.M.; Brozek, J.L.; Cattamanchi, A.; Chaisson, L.H.; Chaisson, R.E.; Daley, C.L.; Grzemska, M.; et al. Official American Thoracic Society/Centers for Disease Control and Prevention/Infectious Diseases Society of America Clinical Practice Guidelines: Treatment of Drug-Susceptible Tuberculosis. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2016, 63, e147–e195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Sterling, T.R.; Njie, G.; Zenner, D.; Cohn, D.L.; Reves, R.; Ahmed, A.; Menzies, D.; Horsburgh, C.R.; Crane, C.M.; Burgos, M.; et al. Guidelines for the Treatment of Latent Tuberculosis Infection: Recommendations from the National Tuberculosis Controllers Association and CDC, 2020. MMWR. Recomm. Rep. 2020, 69, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Gupta, A.; Montepiedra, G.; Aaron, L.; Theron, G.; McCarthy, K.; Bradford, S.; Chipato, T.; Vhembo, T.; Stranix-Chibanda, L.; Onyango-Makumbi, C.; et al. Isoniazid Preventive Therapy in HIV-Infected Pregnant and Postpartum Women. N. Engl. J. Med. 2019, 381, 1333–1346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Kalk, E.; Heekes, A.; Mehta, U.; de Waal, R.; Jacob, N.; Cohen, K.; Myer, L.; Davies, M.-A.; Maartens, G.; Boulle, A. Safety and Effectiveness of Isoniazid Preventive Therapy in Pregnant Women Living with Human Immunodeficiency Virus on Antiretroviral Therapy: An Observational Study Using Linked Population Data. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2020, 71, e351–e358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Taylor, A.W.; Mosimaneotsile, B.; Mathebula, U.; Mathoma, A.; Moathlodi, R.; Theebetsile, I.; Samandari, T. Pregnancy outcomes in HIV-infected women receiving long-term isoniazid prophylaxis for tuberculosis and antiretroviral therapy. Infect. Dis. Obstet. Gynecol. 2013, 2013, 195637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Hamada, Y.; Figueroa, C.; Martín-Sánchez, M.; Falzon, D.; Kanchar, A. The safety of isoniazid tuberculosis preventive treatment in pregnant and postpartum women: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur. Respir. J. 2020, 55, 1901967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Red Book: 2021–2024 Report of the Committee on Infectious Diseases|Red Book Online|American Academy of Pediatrics. Available online: https://publications.aap.org/redbook/book/347/Red-Book-2021-2024-Report-of-the-Committee-on?autologincheck=redirected?nfToken=00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000 (accessed on 28 October 2022).
  57. Mathad, J.S.; Savic, R.; Britto, P.; Jayachandran, P.; Wiesner, L.; Montepiedra, G.; Norman, J.; Zhang, N.; Townley, E.; Chakhtoura, N.; et al. Pharmacokinetics and Safety of 3 Months of Weekly Rifapentine and Isoniazid for Tuberculosis Prevention in Pregnant Women. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2022, 74, 1604–1613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Moro, R.N.; Scott, N.A.; Vernon, A.; Tepper, N.K.; Goldberg, S.V.; Schwartzman, K.; Leung, C.-C.; Schluger, N.W.; Belknap, R.W.; Chaisson, R.E.; et al. Exposure to Latent Tuberculosis Treatment during Pregnancy. The PREVENT TB and the iAdhere Trials. Ann. Am. Thorac. Soc. 2018, 15, 570–580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Swindells, S.; Ramchandani, R.; Gupta, A.; Benson, C.A.; Leon-Cruz, J.; Mwelase, N.; Juste, M.A.J.; Lama, J.R.; Valencia, J.; Omoz-Oarhe, A.; et al. One Month of Rifapentine plus Isoniazid to Prevent HIV-Related Tuberculosis. N. Engl. J. Med. 2019, 380, 1001–1011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Gupta, A.H.M.; Leon-Cruz, J.T.; Avihingsanon, A.; Mwelase, N.; Severe, P.; Omoz-Oarhe, A.; Masheto, G.; Moran, L.; Benson, C.A.; Chaisson, R.E.; et al. For the ACTG 5279 BRIEF TB Trial. Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes among HIV-Infected Women Exposed to Isoniazid in Brief-TB. In Proceedings of the CROI 2021, 6–10 March 2021; Abstract 178. Available online: https://www.aidsmap.com/conferences/croi-2021 (accessed on 28 October 2022).
  61. Sterling, T.R.; Scott, N.A.; Miro, J.M.; Calvet, G.; La Rosa, A.; Infante, R.; Chen, M.P.; Benator, D.A.; Gordin, F.; Benson, C.A.; et al. Three months of weekly rifapentine and isoniazid for treatment of Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection in HIV-coinfected persons. AIDS Lond. Engl. 2016, 30, 1607–1615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Consolidated Guidelines on HIV Prevention, Testing, Treatment, Service Delivery and Monitoring: Recommendations for a Public Health Approach. Available online: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240031593 (accessed on 28 October 2022).
  63. Dooley, K.E.; Savic, R.; Gupte, A.; A Marzinke, M.; Zhang, N.; Edward, V.A.; Wolf, L.; Sebe, M.; Likoti, M.; Fyvie, M.J.; et al. Once-weekly rifapentine and isoniazid for tuberculosis prevention in patients with HIV taking dolutegravir-based antiretroviral therapy: A phase 1/2 trial. Lancet HIV 2020, 7, e401–e409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Mulligan, N.; Best, B.M.; Wang, J.; Capparelli, E.V.; Stek, A.; Barr, E.; Buschur, S.L.; Acosta, E.P.; Smith, E.; Chakhtoura, N.; et al. Dolutegravir pharmacokinetics in pregnant and postpartum women living with HIV. AIDS Lond. Engl. 2018, 32, 729–737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Imperial, M.L.A.; Dawson, R.; Cramer, Y.; Rosenkranz, S.; Swindells, S.; Gelmanova, I.; Anchalee, A.A.; Arduino, R.C.; Samaneka, W.; Dooley, K.; et al. DTG PK in people with HIV receiving daily 1HP for latent TB treatment (ACTG A5372). In Proceedings of the CROI 2022, Denver, CO, USA, 12–16 February 2022. Abstract 78. [Google Scholar]
  66. The Aurum Institute NPC. Safety and Tolerability of 1 Month Daily (1HP) and 3 Months Weekly (3HP) Isoniazid and Rifapentine with Pharmacokinetics of Dolutegravir (DTG) in Pregnant People with HIV. 2022. Available online: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT051220269789240031593 (accessed on 28 October 2022).
  67. Franks, A.L.; Binkin, N.J.; Snider, D.E.; Rokaw, W.M.; Becker, S. Isoniazid hepatitis among pregnant and postpartum Hispanic patients. Public Health Rep. Wash. DC 1989, 104, 151–155. [Google Scholar]
  68. Moulding, T.S.; Redeker, A.G.; Kanel, G.C. Twenty Isoniazid-associated Deaths in One State. Am. Rev. Respir. Dis. 1989, 140, 700–705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Martinson, N.A.; Barnes, G.L.; Moulton, L.H.; Msandiwa, R.; Hausler, H.; Ram, M.; McIntyre, J.A.; Gray, G.E.; Chaisson, R.E. New Regimens to Prevent Tuberculosis in Adults with HIV Infection. N. Engl. J. Med. 2011, 365, 11–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Tiam, A.; Machekano, R.; Gounder, C.R.; Maama-Maime, L.B.; Ntene-Sealiete, K.; Sahu, M.; Isavwa, A.; Oyebanji, O.; Ahimbisibwe, A.; Mokone, M.; et al. Preventing tuberculosis among HIV-infected pregnant women in Lesotho: The case for rolling out active case finding and isoniazid preventive therapy. J. Acquir. Immune Defic. Syndr. 2014, 67, e5–e11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. LaCourse, S.M.; Wagner, A.D.; Cranmer, L.M.; Copeland, A.; Maleche-Obimbo, E.; Richardson, B.A.; Matemo, D.; Kinuthia, J.; John-Stewart, G. Brief Report: High Programmatic Isoniazid Preventive Therapy (IPT) Use in Pregnancy Among HIV-Infected Women. JAIDS 2019, 82, 41–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Mathad, J.S.; Queiroz, A.T.L.; Bhosale, R.; Alexander, M.; Naik, S.; Kulkarni, V.; Andrade, B.B.; Gupta, A. Transcriptional analysis for tuberculosis in pregnant women from the PRACHITi study. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2022, ciac437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Singh, P.; Moulton, L.H.; Barnes, G.L.; Gupta, A.; Msandiwa, R.; Chaisson, R.E.; Martinson, N.A. Pregnancy in Women with HIV in a Tuberculosis Preventive Therapy Trial. JAIDS 2022, 91, 397–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. US Department of Health and Human Services. Panel on Antiretroviral Guidelines for Adults and Adolescents. Guidelines for the Prevention and Treatment of Opportunistic Infections in Adults and Adolescents with HIV. Available online: https://clinicalinfo.hiv.gov/en/guidelines/adult-and-adolescent-opportunistic-infection/whats-new-guidelines (accessed on 1 October 2022).
  75. Shah, N.S.; Yuen, C.M.; Heo, M.; Tolman, A.W.; Becerra, M.C. Yield of contact investigations in households of patients with drug-resistant tuberculosis: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2014, 58, 381–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  76. Kim, S.; Wu, X.; Hughes, M.D.; Upton, C.; Narunsky, K.; Mendoza-Ticona, A.; Khajenoori, S.; Gonzales, P.; Badal-Faesen, S.; Shenje, J.; et al. High Prevalence of Tuberculosis Infection and Disease in Child Household Contacts of Adults with Rifampin-resistant Tuberculosis. Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J. 2022, 41, e194–e202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. WHO. Consolidated Guidelines on Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis Treatment. Available online: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/311389 (accessed on 28 December 2021).
  78. Fletcher, H.A.; Snowden, M.A.; Landry, B.; Rida, W.; Satti, I.; Harris, S.A.; Matsumiya, M.; Tanner, R.; O’Shea, M.K.; Dheenadhayalan, V.; et al. T-cell activation is an immune correlate of risk in BCG vaccinated infants. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 11290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table
Table 2. Treatment regimens for latent TB infection in pregnancy.
Table 2. Treatment regimens for latent TB infection in pregnancy.
RegimenDosingComment
6H or 9H
Isoniazid * daily for 6 or 9 months		Isoniazid 5 mg/kg (300 mg maximum)CDC/WHO: preferred for pregnant PWHIV
36H
Isoniazid * daily for 36 months		Isoniazid 5 mg/kg (300 mg maximum)WHO: preferred in settings of high TB transmission including pregnant PWHIV
3HR
Isoniazid * AND Rifampin
daily for 3 months		Isoniazid 5 mg/kg (300 mg maximum) AND
Rifampin 10 mg/kg (600 mg maximum)
4R
Rifampin daily for 4 months		Rifampin 10 mg/kg (600 mg maximum)
3HP
Isoniazid * AND Rifapentine
weekly for 3 months		Not currently recommended in pregnancy
(some pregnancy safety data)
1HP
Isoniazid * AND Rifapentine
daily for 1 month		Not currently recommended in pregnancy
(no data in pregnancy, trials planned)
Abbreviations: CDC = US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; WHO = World Health Organization; PWHIV = people with HIV; * Isoniazid containing regimens should be administered with pyridoxine (B6) 25 to 50 mg daily to reduce risk of peripheral neuropathy; Data on safety of rifapentine in pregnancy are limited; therefore, 3HP and 1HP are not currently recommended in people who are pregnant or expecting to become pregnant during the treatment period.
Table
Table 3. Studies of latent TB infection treatment in pregnancy.
Table 3. Studies of latent TB infection treatment in pregnancy.
StudyTreatment RegimenStudy SitePopulationStudy DesignFindings
Franks et al., Public Health Reports 1989 [67]6HUSA3681 women during and after pregnancyRetrospective cohortA total of 5 pregnant women developed hepatitis; 2 of the 5 died.
Moulding et al., Am Rev Resp Disease 1989 [68]6HUSA24 people who died while taking isoniazidRetrospective cohortA total of 20 isoniazid associated deaths, 4 initiated isoniazid in pregnancy.
Martinson et al., NEJM 2011 [69]3HP vs. 3HR vs. 6HSouth Africa235 WHIV who became pregnant during treatment or follow-upSub-analysis of RCTPregnant women on 3HP and 3HR were discontinued off treatment. A total of 26 became pregnant on isoniazid; 10 chose to continue with no toxicity observed.
Taylor et al., IDOBGYN 2013 [54]6H vs. 36HBotswana103 WHIV who became pregnant during trial (37% on cART, 63% on AZT or AZT/3TC for PMTCT)Sub-analysis of RCTNo isoniazid-associated hepatitis or other severe isoniazid-associated adverse events were observed.
Tiam et al.,
JAIDS 2014 [70]		6HLesotho160 Pregnant WHIV at 1st ANC visit (36% on ART, 65% on AZT for PMTCT)Prospective cohortIPT was initiated in 124/158 (78.5%) pregnant WHIV; 64.5% women completed a 6-month IPT regimen; 2 (1.6%) died of causes unrelated to IPT/TB; and 31.5% were lost to follow-up.
Moro et al.,
Ann Am Thorac Soc 2018 [58]		3HP vs. 9HUSA, Canada, Brazil, Spain, Peru, South Africa, Hong Kong126 women who became pregnant during trialSub-analysis of 2 RCTsOf the total 126 pregnancies, fetal loss was reported in 8/54 (15%) and 9/72 (13%), 3HP and 9H, respectively; and congenital anomalies in 1/37 (3%) and 2/56 (4%) live births, 3HP and 9H, respectively. The overall proportions of fetal loss (17/126 (13%)) and anomalies (3/93 (3%)) were similar to those estimated for the United States, 17% and 3%, respectively.
Gupta et al., NEJM 2019 [52]6HBotswana, Haiti, India, South Africa, Tanzania, Thailand, Uganda, Zimbabwe956 pregnant WHIV, 14–34 weeks gestation, 99% on cARTRCTA primary outcome event (treatment-related maternal adverse events of grade 3 or higher or permanent discontinuation of the trial regimen because of toxic effects) occurred in 72 of 477 women (15.1%) in the group that IPT was initiated in during pregnancy and in 73 of 479 (15.2%) in the group that IPT was initiated in postpartum. The risks associated with initiation of IPT during pregnancy appeared to be greater than those associated with initiation of therapy during the postpartum period.
LaCourse et al., 2019 [71]6HKenya300 postpartum WHIV, 100% on cARTRetrospective cohortA total of 224 reported previous IPT; 155 (69%) had any IPT use during pregnancy. Six-month IPT completion rates were high (147/160 (91.9%)) among women with sufficient time to complete before infant trial enrollment and similar among preconception or during pregnancy initiators.
Kalk et al.,
Clin Infect Dis 2020 [53]		6H-12HSouth Africa43,971 Pregnant WHIV on or initiating cARTRetrospective cohortA total of 16.6% received IPT during pregnancy. Women who received IPT were less likely to experience poor pregnancy outcomes (adjusted odds ratio (aOR), 0.83); this association strengthened with IPT started after the first trimester compared with none (aOR, 0.71) or with first-trimester exposure (aOR, 0.64). IPT reduced the risk of TB by approximately 30%.
Salazar-Austin et al., Clin Infect Dis 2020 [11]6HSouth Africa151 Pregnant WHIVProspective cohortOf the 69 IPT-exposed women, 11 (16%) had an adverse pregnancy outcome compared with 23 (28%) IPT-unexposed women. The adjusted odds of having an adverse pregnancy outcome were 2.5 times higher in IPT-unexposed women compared with IPT-exposed women after controlling for confounding factors.
Mathad et al.,
Clin Infect Dis 2022 [72]		3HPHaiti, Kenya, Malawi, Thailand, Zimbabwe50 pregnant w/ and w/o HIVRCTAmong 30 women without HIV, clearance of rifapentine was 28% lower during pregnancy than postpartum. In 20 pregnant WHIV, clearance was 30% higher than women without HIV (p < 0.001). 3HP does not require dose adjustment in pregnancy. There were no drug-related serious adverse events.
Singh et al., JAIDS 2022 [73]3HP vs. 3HR vs. 6HSouth Africa216 women who became pregnant during trialSub-analysis of RCTA total of 216/896 women (24%) conceived during the study. A total of 34 women became pregnant while taking preventive treatment (8 rifamycin, 26 isoniazid monotherapy). The odds of pregnancy were higher in women in the rifamycin-isoniazid arms than the isoniazid arms (3HP: 1.73, p = 0.001; 3HR: 1.55, p = 0.017) despite increased contraceptive use compared to the standard 6H therapy.
Treatments: 6H–12H = Isoniazid daily for 6–12 months, 3HP = Isoniazid and Rifampin weekly for 3 months, 3HR = Isoniazid and Rifampin daily for 3 months, 36H = Isoniazid daily for 36 months. Abbreviations: WHIV = women with HIV; cART = combined antiretroviral therapy; ANC = antenatal care; IPT = Isoniazid preventative therapy; AZT = Azidothymidine; 3CT = Lamivudine; PMTCT = prevention of mother to child transmission; RCT = randomized controlled trial.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Mathad, J.S.; Yadav, S.; Vaidyanathan, A.; Gupta, A.; LaCourse, S.M. Tuberculosis Infection in Pregnant People: Current Practices and Research Priorities. Pathogens 2022, 11, 1481. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens11121481

AMA Style

Mathad JS, Yadav S, Vaidyanathan A, Gupta A, LaCourse SM. Tuberculosis Infection in Pregnant People: Current Practices and Research Priorities. Pathogens. 2022; 11(12):1481. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens11121481

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mathad, Jyoti S., Sharan Yadav, Arthi Vaidyanathan, Amita Gupta, and Sylvia M. LaCourse. 2022. "Tuberculosis Infection in Pregnant People: Current Practices and Research Priorities" Pathogens 11, no. 12: 1481. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens11121481

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop