1. Introduction
The sealing property between key components of aero-engines has always been an unavoidable topic in the process of engine design and manufacturing. Due to the various rotating structures inside the engine and the existence of a large number of dynamic and static contact surfaces, efficient sealing devices are needed to tightly seal the mechanical connection interfaces to reduce fluid leakage. As a new sealing technology, the segmented annular seal was first invented and improved by NASA [
1] based on the end face seal and applied to the helium gas seal of aerospace engines. In recent years, as an important component of the sealing device of aero-engines, the segmented annular seal has been able to better cope with increasingly severe sealing conditions. Thus, it has received extensive attention from scholars. The segmented annular seal is an adaptive sealing structure that can automatically adjust the gap between the sealing ring and the shaft to ensure that the gap between the shaft and the sealing ring is minimized without friction, thereby withstanding a higher-pressure difference [
2].
Compared with the common floating ring seal, the segmented annular seal has the advantages of compact structure, easy assembly and lower leakage [
3,
4,
5]. However, the friction and wear problem during the opening process of the segmented annular seal objectively exists, which affects the service life of the sealing structure and leads to its failure. Scholars have proposed that the dynamic pressure segmented annular seal with shallow grooves on the inner surface of the ring segment can enhance the hydrodynamic pressure effect, thereby improving the overall opening performance of the split float ring seal, enabling the fluid dynamic seal to form as soon as possible, and thus reducing the high-speed friction and wear caused by the contact between the ring segment and the rotor [
6].
The research directions on segmented annular seals mainly focus on friction and wear tests, physical field simulation analysis, and numerical calculations. Yan et al. [
7] conducted high-temperature friction and wear experiments on graphite M210 sealing materials and found that the coefficient of friction first increased, then decreased, and finally stabilized with the rise in temperature, reaching the lowest point at 450 °C. The wear rate continued to rise, and a friction and wear performance prediction model was established based on the grey theory. Ma et al. [
8] found that there is an optimal range (4 to 5 N/m) for the circumferential spring specific pressure of the annular segment floating seal, within which the leakage is relatively low through experimental research. Excessive spring force will accelerate wear, causing abrasive wear and adhesive wear. Therefore, under the premise of meeting the sealing requirements, a smaller spring force should be selected. Wang et al. [
9] studied a segmented annular seal using the finite element method and found that under high pressure difference and high rotational speed conditions, frictional heat generation would lead to thermal deformation of the sealing surface and an increase in leakage. Li et al. [
10] found that the wear rate of a three-piece high-speed segmented annular seal increases significantly with the rise in pressure and rotational speed through a combination of numerical simulation and experiments. Meanwhile, the circumferential spring specific pressure can simultaneously control leakage and wear within a certain range, which is a key sensitive parameter affecting the friction and wear performance of the seal. Wang et al. [
11] found that with the increase in friction duration, the friction coefficient of a circular graphite seal first decreased rapidly, then slightly increased, and finally levelled off. Moreover, the wear amount increased significantly with the increase in the types and quantities of grooves on the surface of the sealing ring. Hady [
12] measured the operating temperature, leakage, friction torque and wear of a conventional circumferential graphite seal and compared it with the improved conventional circumferential graphite seal with an automatic floating structure. It was found that when the automatic floating circumferential graphite seal operates at a lower temperature, its torque is half that of the conventional circumferential graphite seal, and its wear is approximately one-tenth of that of the conventional circumferential graphite seal.
Under complex working conditions, unreasonable clearance design and matching can easily lead to excessive wear and seal failure. Excessive deformation of the sealing ring is often the key factor causing wear of the main sealing surface and excessive leakage. Some scholars have conducted simulation research on segmented annular seals by means of the multi-physics coupling method.
Zhou et al. [
13] established a multi-field coupling analysis model based on a four-petal graphite seal and studied the flow field, temperature field and structural field characteristics of the graphite seal under conditions of high linear velocity and low-pressure difference. Chen et al. [
14] established a multi-field coupling model of mixed lubrication for graphite circumferential seals using a semi-analytical solution method to study the sealing performance of the main and secondary sealing channels of graphite circumferential seals. Yun et al. [
15] established a mechanical theoretical model of the circular spring in a circular graphite seal, analyzed the causes of the uneven distribution of the spring force, and studied the influence of the uneven circular spring force on the deformation of the sealing ring. Zheng [
16] optimized the parameters of a circumferential spring and analyzed and solved the force of the circumferential spring under the premise of ensuring the sealing performance and followability.
To further optimize the opening characteristics, Arghir et al. [
17] established a segmented annular seal model with micro-textures set on the outer surface of the rotor, studied the influence of the inclined grooves on the rotor, and proposed two numerical simplified models to solve the sealing opening force. Fourt et al. [
18] studied the influences of pad waviness, groove depth and spring force on the characteristics of a segmented annular seal under given steady-state operating conditions, calculated the equilibrium positions of each seal flap, and further calculated the leakage and torque of the seal. Alessio et al. [
19] studied the influence of a segmented annular seal on seal leakage and wear under the conditions of radial axial offset, angular offset, and the coexistence of both. Oike et al. [
20] analyzed the leakage characteristics of a segmented annular seal under all working conditions and clearly characterized the wear morphology of the seals.
It can be concluded from the literature review that the combination of test and simulation methods enables a better investigation of the operating mechanism of segmented annular seals. This paper takes a three-petal segmented annular seal as the research object, describes the friction and wear conditions of the segmented ring before opening, studies the harm of friction and wear to the segmented annular seal, and explores its basic opening mechanism and opening effect, and by using different optimization designs for the ring, a better opening effect can be achieved, thereby reducing friction loss and increasing the life of the seal.
2. Numerical Model
2.1. Working Principle
2.1.1. Theoretical Model
The structure of the segmented annular seal is shown in
Figure 1. It is divided into the main sealing structure and the secondary sealing structure. The main sealing structure is mainly composed of a sealing ring body made of graphite material, consisting of 3 to 6 segments, which are tightly fastened to the circumferential spring on the rotor. The secondary sealing structure mainly consists of a sealing seat that wraps around the sealing ring, which serves to protect the main seal and prevent trace leakage. The sealing ring is fixed to the sealing seat under the compression action of the axial spring. The inner surface of the segment is usually provided with axial grooves and circumferential grooves to introduce fluid for lubrication. Some segments also have pockets on their inner surfaces to increase the opening force, enabling the sealing ring to reach a non-contact state as soon as possible, thereby reducing the friction loss of the sealing ring and extending its life.
When the engine is stationary, the sealing ring forms a relatively good static seal by means of the closing force provided by the circumferential spring and the high-precision surface that fits with the rotor. As the rotor rotates, the sealing ring opens, and a non-contact dynamic seal begins to form. A fluid domain is formed between the inner surface of the sealing ring and the rotor as the main leakage channel, and at the same time, a hydrodynamic pressure effect is generated to maintain the stable operation of the dynamic seal.
2.1.2. Force Analysis
When the segmented annular seal is stably open, the radial force satisfies the following equilibrium equation:
In the formula,
Fp is the hydrodynamic pressure provided by the gas film in the main sealing gap, and
Fa is the supporting force provided by the rotor.
Fn is the circumferential pressure generated by the medium in the sealed cavity,
Fcs is the clamping force provided by the circumferential spring,
Ff is the frictional force between the sealing seat and the segment,
Fas is the axial force generated by the compression spring and the medium pressure, and
μ is the friction coefficient between the sealing seat and the segmented annular seal. The
Fp hydrodynamic pressure on the right side of the equal sign in Equation (1) provides the opening force for the segmented annular seal.
Fn + Fcs + Ff on the left side of the equal sign in Equation (1) is called the opening resistance. The force analysis of the segmented annular seal is shown in
Figure 2. By analyzing the opening force and opening resistance, the operating status of the seal can be better judged.
2.1.3. The Working Process of the Segmented Annular Seal
The working process of the segmented annular seal mainly consists of two stages: the running-in stage and the normal working stage.
The first stage is the sealed running-in stage. When the engine is stationary, due to the “tightening” effect of the circumferential spring, the s segmented annular seals are closely attached to the rotor, and the inner diameter of the segmented annular seals is slightly smaller than the outer diameter of the metal. When the rotor starts to rotate, at this time, the rotational speed of the rotating shaft is less than the opening speed of the seal, the opening force is less than the opening resistance, the fluid dynamic seal is not opened, and there is relative motion between the graphite ring and the rotor. Due to the lower hardness of the graphite ring compared to the metal, under the action of continuous relative motion, the main sealing surface of the graphite ring undergoes high-speed friction and wear in this state, the fluid pressure
Fp increases with the increase in rotational speed, the hydrodynamic pressure effect intensifies, and the rotor support force
Fa decreases. When the opening rotational speed is reached,
Fa = 0, and the segmented annular seal slightly adheres to the rotor. At this time, the force balance equation is
At this point, the opening force is equal to the opening resistance, and the inner diameter of the segmented annular seal is theoretically equal to the outer diameter of the metal track. The state of the sealing component is shown in
Figure 3a. At this stage, the friction and wear of graphite ring segments at high rotational speeds can mainly be studied through experimental methods.
The second stage is the sealed normal operation stage. Under the effect of relative motion, the segmented annular seal and the metal track generate a large amount of frictional heat, causing both the segmented annular seal and the metal track to rise to a certain temperature. When the metal track rotates at high speed, the dynamic pressure generated by the fluid overcomes the opening resistance such as the frictional force of the sealing seat and the elastic force of the circumferential spring, causing the segmented annular seal to gradually move away from the rotor track along the radial direction. The segmented annular seal is fully opened and segment connects from the metal track, and the thickness of the gas film begins to increase. The state of the sealing assembly is shown in
Figure 3b.
As the hydrodynamic pressure Fp increases, the segmented annular seal moves away from the rotor under the action of the fluid pressure. At this time, the circumferential spring is stretched, and the spring force increases, allowing the equilibrium state of Equation (3) to continue to be maintained. When the rotor speed stabilizes, the hydrodynamic pressure no longer changes with the speed, and the segmented annular seal no longer undergoes significant displacement. Under the combined action of the opening force and opening resistance, it vibrates slightly back and forth along the radial direction. At this time, the sealing gap changes to a certain extent. When the sealing gap increases, the hydrodynamic pressure effect weakens, the opening force decreases, and the seal tends to close, resulting in a reduction in the sealing gap, an increase in the hydrodynamic pressure effect, and an increase in the opening force, and the seal tends to open. At this point, a dynamic equilibrium is formed; the seal is stably formed at this rotational speed. In the second stage, the operating principle of the seal is studied and optimized design is carried out through fluid simulation and multi-physics field coupling methods. By optimizing the structure to change the opening force, the seal can reach a stable operating state more quickly, which is conducive to reducing heat generation and wear and extending the service life of the segmented annular seal.
2.2. Computational Equation
The key research object during the normal operation stage of the segmented annular seal is the sealing fluid gap, and it is necessary to establish the fluid control equation for the sealed gas. To simplify the fluid calculation and analysis process, the following assumptions are made for the fluid domain:
- (1)
Ignore the trace amount of lubricating oil contained in the gap and consider the fluid in the gap to be a compressible ideal gas single-phase flow;
- (2)
The gas flow in the sealed gap is continuous;
- (3)
Gases do not undergo sliding motion at solid interfaces.
Based on the above assumptions, the basic physical equations that need to be followed to seal the gas are constructed. The continuity equation is expressed as
In the formula, u, v, and w represent the velocity components of the fluid in the x, y, and z directions, respectively.
The Reynolds equation for fluids is expressed as
In the formula, a represents the thickness of the sealing gap, U is the surface velocity of the fluid, and μ is the viscosity of the fluid.
Fluid mechanics analysis indicates that the Reynolds number (Re) under the current working conditions is in the low value range, meeting the application conditions of laminar flow theory. However, under the combined effect of the high-speed running sealing and the complex channel structure, the airtight medium in the gap area shows turbulent characteristics, and the traditional laminar flow simulation method struggles to accurately describe its flow characteristics. For this purpose, numerical calculations are carried out through the RNG k-ε model in this paper. This model enhances the analytical accuracy of curved wall circumferential flow and rotational flow by correcting the vortices viscosity coefficient and is applicable to the high-complexity outflow field problem involved in this paper [
21]. The fluid control equation is obtained as
In the formula, μt represents the turbulent viscosity coefficient.
The contact state of the solid domain involved in this paper belongs to high-speed nonlinear behaviour and is often solved by the finite element method. The equilibrium state of the sealing ring under hydrodynamic pressure can be solved by the solid-state-domain control equation [
22]:
In the formula, M represents the mass matrix, C is the damping matrix, K is the stiffness matrix,
,
, and
are the acceleration vector, velocity vector and displacement vector, respectively, and F(t) is the load vector of the graphite sealing ring.
The solid-state-domain model is used for frictional heat calculation and a transient solver is used for calculation to understand the heating process. The calculation equation for frictional heat [
23] is
In the formula, n represents the rotational speed, D0 is the diameter of the rotor, B is the width of the sealing ring, pc is the contact load of the main sealing surface, and f is the friction coefficient of the main sealing surface.
The coupling interface between the sealing gas in the sealing gap and the graphite seal should satisfy the equality of displacement, stress, temperature and heat flux density; that is, the governing equations for thermal–fluid–solid coupling are expressed as [
24]
In the formula, m is the normal vector of the coupling interface; τf and τs are the stresses on the contact surfaces of the sealing gas and the solid; df and ds are the displacements of the sealing gas and the solid; Qf and Qs are the heat flux densities on the contact surfaces of the fluid domain and the solid domain; and Tf and Ts are the temperatures on the contact surfaces of the sealing gas and the solid domain.
During the calculation of the thermal–fluid–solid coupling model, it is necessary to transfer data at the coupling interface to solve the deformation of the solid domain. After incorporating heat calculation, according to Fourier’s law, the convective heat flux
qw [
25] between the seal and the sealing gas at the fluid–solid coupling interface is
In the formula, λ is the thermal conductivity of the sealing fluid.
2.3. Test Description
The test in this study was a high-speed ring-block friction and wear test, and the test principle is shown in
Figure 4.
High-speed ring-block friction and wear test is a testing method used to evaluate the wear resistance of materials under high-speed friction conditions. The two samples to be tested are installed on the test bench. Among them, the metal ring is installed on the main shaft of the motor and can rotate at high speed driven by the motor. The graphite block is installed in the fixture and a certain load is applied to rub against the metal ring to simulate the high-speed friction and wear process of the material in the actual process. By rotating the annular sample and making it in fixed contact with the graphite block, the high-speed friction condition is simulated. By changing the load, rotational speed and type of graphite material, the changes in the friction coefficient, friction force and surface roughness are observed to infer the relationship between each factor and high-speed friction wear and to study the wear behaviour of the material surface caused by frictional heat and mechanical stress. By analyzing the high-speed friction and wear between the segmented annular seal and the rotating shaft before it floats up, the friction and wear process and wear mechanism in the formation of the segmented annular seal are explored.
To complete the high-speed graphite ring-block friction and wear test, a high-speed ring-block friction and wear test bench was designed and used, as shown in
Figure 5, and was equipped with corresponding measurement and detection equipment. The high-speed ring-block friction and wear test bench could simulate the actual working state of the sample under the action of high speed and force load and study the high-speed friction and wear process of graphite ring-blocks under real working conditions, and at the same time, the control end of the test bench could output result parameters such as the friction coefficient and friction force. Through the thermal imager, the change in temperature with time was recorded for the analysis of the law and mechanism after the test.
The samples for this test were the upper sample made of T482 graphite material and the lower sample made of GH4169 superalloy. The material parameters are shown in
Table 1 and
Table 2.
2.4. Flow Chart
The main research process of this article is shown in
Figure 6. Firstly, through friction and wear tests, the surface friction and wear morphology and wear rate of the graphite material were obtained. Then, the parameters such as the friction coefficient, friction force, and temperature in the tests were plotted and analyzed in accordance with the rules. The fluid in the sealed gap was simulated and calculated through fluent to analyze the flow field characteristics. By combining the friction force and temperature obtained from the friction test, as well as the temperature and pressure calculated from the fluid, with the solid-domain analysis, the thermal–solid coupling and thermo-fluid–solid coupling calculations were carried out to obtain the deformation characteristics of the graphite ring segment, which intuitively reflected the harm of friction wear and frictional heat generation to the segmented annular seal. Finally, the structure of the segmented annular seal was optimized by designing pocket and micro-textures, and simulation calculations of the sealing fluid were carried out. The leakage volume and hydrodynamic pressure were analyzed to determine the optimization results, and the optimization theory was summarized.
2.5. Calculation Model
The simulation research object used in this paper is a contact segmented annular seal. The calculation model is shown in
Figure 7, and the model parameters are shown in
Table 3. Based on this model, solid-state-domain analysis, flow field analysis and structural optimization design were carried out. The solid domain is the gap between the rotor and the sealing ring, and the fluid domain is the main sealing fluid gap. The key research objects of this paper include the flow field characteristics of the main seal of the segmented annular seal, and thus the fluid gap at the lap joint of the ring segments is ignored.
2.6. Grid Division Method
The fluid domain was meshed by the sweeping method. The main seal gap was divided into four parts: the air film, the pocket, the circumferential groove and the axial groove. Meshing was carried out for each of the four parts, respectively. If the thickness of the gas film was greater than 10 microns, the grid could be generated by the method of overall sweeping and external surface grid division. If the thickness of the gas film was less than 10 microns, the gas film needed to be pre-treated and swept in sections to generate the grid. The meshing of the fluid domain is shown in
Figure 8a. The size of the gas film varied significantly by orders of magnitude compared with other regions. To ensure calculation accuracy, the size of the gas film in the thickness direction needed to be additionally densified. Tetrahedral meshes were used for solid-domain meshing. The fluid-solid contact surface needed to be additionally densified, and the element size was 0.1 mm. The meshing of the solid domain is shown in
Figure 8b.
2.7. Simulation Validation
The results of grid independence are shown in
Figure 9a. With the change in the number of grids, the leakage rate and the maximum pressure tend to stabilize. At this point, the total number of grids is determined to be 2 million. The calculation results are relatively accurate, with less waste of computing power and high calculation efficiency. At the same time, the thickness of the air film is determined to be encrypted by 7 layers. In subsequent calculations, the fluid domain in the pocket needs to be encrypted to 5 layers to ensure the accuracy of the calculation.
Figure 9b shows the comparison of the leakage in the fluid domain of the segmented annular seal at a rotational speed of 500 revolutions per second (rps) and pressure differences of 0.25 MPa, 0.42 MPa, 0.59 MPa, and 0.76 MPa, respectively, with the data in reference [
6]. As can be seen from
Figure 9b, the calculated data is in good agreement with the data in the literature, and the maximum deviation of the leakage is 3%. This indicates that the adopted calculation method is feasible.