Rare Combination of Partial ARCAPA and Dual LAD: Insights into Complex Coronary Variants

Figure 1. CT evaluation of the coronary artery anatomy. (A) MIP Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography (CCTA) image in the axial plane shows the abnormal origin of the dilated infundibular artery from the main pulmonary artery (partial ARCAPA), with evidence of contrast enhancement reflow. (B) MIP CCTA image in the oblique plane shows the dual LAD variant originating from the LAD proper. (C,D) VR images show the infundibular coronary perfusion territory and the anatomical configurations of the two anomalies. ARCAPA is extremely rare, with an estimated incidence of approximately 0.002% in the general population and accounting for only about 0.12% of all coronary artery anomalies [1]. Dual LAD is relatively more common, with a prevalence ranging from approximately 1% in conventional angiographic series to about 4–6% in large CCTA cohorts [2]. However, the coexistence of these two anomalies is considered exceptionally rare. In fact, the literature is limited to isolated case reports, and to the best of our knowledge, no large epidemiological studies report the prevalence of their simultaneous occurrence [3]. Our focus is on a hypertensive 51-year-old male patient with hypercholesterolemia; the electrocardiogram showed sinus rhythm at 75 bpm with diffuse repolarization abnormalities, including T-wave inversions in the precordial leads, consistent with a left ventricular strain pattern in the context of systemic hypertension. Transthoracic echocardiography showed a left ventricle of normal size with mildly increased wall thickness and preserved systolic function (LVEF 55%). The left atrium was mildly dilated, while the right sections were within normal limits. The aortic valve was tricuspid with thickened cusps but no stenosis. The mitral and tricuspid valves were mildly thickened with trivial to mild regurgitation and no stenosis. No pericardial effusion was observed. Doppler assessment demonstrated an E/A ratio < 1, consistent with mild diastolic dysfunction. Given the patient’s asymptomatic status, cardiovascular risk factors, and nonspecific findings on ECG and echocardiography, CCTA was performed as the initial noninvasive test to assess both coronary artery disease and congenital coronary anatomy [2,4]. The findings included a split LAD deriving from the LAD proper (type II in Spindola-Franco’s Classification [2,5,6] and an infundibular artery, usually a right branch, that anomalously originates from the left side of the main pulmonary artery [Figure 1]. Typically [1,3], the artery originating from MPA is dilated and tortuous due to collateral burden and retrograde diastolic flow toward the MPA, evidenced by a blush of contrast enhancement. Furthermore, this artery does not follow the typical course of the right coronary artery and supplies the anterior walls of both the left and right ventricles. The ostium of the right coronary artery originates from the aorta; however, the RCA follows the acute margin and does not reach the posterior interventricular sulcus or several segments of the right ventricular wall. Coronary circulation is, in fact, left-dominant, with the PDA and PL branches supplied by the circumflex artery. No myocardial scarring was evident on CCTA. The coexistence of a dual LAD and the limited myocardial territory supplied by the ARCAPA may reduce the overall ischemic burden and could explain the patient’s asymptomatic status, as well as the normal ECG and echocardiography findings [7,8,9]. Consequently, no dedicated functional ischemia testing was performed. In this asymptomatic patient, a conservative approach with close clinical follow-up was chosen, including noninvasive assessments such as ECG, Holter monitoring, and transthoracic echocardiography every six months. Long-term surveillance is therefore recommended to monitor for the development of potential subclinical myocardial dysfunction and to better understand the natural history of the anomaly. This case highlights the uniqueness of this association, the importance of individualized, anatomy-based management, and the value of detailed imaging assessment [10].