Skip Content
You are currently on the new version of our website. Access the old version .
MDPIMDPI
Search all articles
LifeLife
Download PDF
  • Review
  • Open Access

27 January 2025

The Seasonality of Retinal Detachment: Peaks, Troughs, and Global Trends

,
,
,
,
,
and
1
First Department of Ophthalmology, AHEPA University Hospital, School of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Kiriakidi 1, 54636 Thessaloniki, Greece
2
Ophthalmica Eye Institute, 54622 Thessaloniki, Greece
3
Division of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2UH, UK
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Life2025, 15(2), 190;https://doi.org/10.3390/life15020190
This article belongs to the Special Issue Eye Diseases: Diagnosis and Treatment, 3rd Edition
Version Notes
Order Reprints

Abstract

Purpose: To examine the seasonality of retinal detachment (RD) and explore global patterns and contributing factors through a narrative review. Methods: Studies investigating seasonal trends in RD incidence across diverse regions were analysed for peak seasons, meteorological influences, and behavioural factors. Results: RD seasonality varies by region. Northern climates (e.g., Finland) report summer peaks linked to prolonged daylight, while warmer climates (e.g., Kuwait) show winter peaks associated with outdoor activity. Some studies found correlations with temperature, light, and atmospheric pressure, while others reported no seasonal variation. Conclusions: RD seasonality reflects a complex interplay of environmental and behavioural factors. Future research should focus on standardised methodologies to clarify these relationships and inform preventative strategies.

1. Introduction

Retinal detachment is the separation of the neurosensory retina (NSR) from the underlying retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) [1]. This separation disrupts the normal function of the retina and can lead to permanent vision loss if not treated promptly. The forces that keep these layers in close apposition are both mechanical and metabolic in nature [2]. Mechanically, the vitreous supports the retina in place, along with the intraocular pressure. Metabolically, active processes regulate fluid balance and maintain ionic gradients to preserve retinal adhesion. Disruption in any of these mechanisms can lead to the accumulation of fluid beneath the retina, resulting in retinal detachment [2].
Whether the vitreous plays a direct role in retinal adhesion is yet to be determined, although some studies suggest that the physical structure of the vitreous might be of importance in maintaining retinal apposition [3,4].
There are four major types of retinal detachment: RRD, tractional retinal detachment (TRD), exudative or serous retinal detachment (ERD or SRD), and combined tractional rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. RRD, the most prevalent type, occurs when a retinal tear or hole allows vitreous fluid and/or misdirected aqueous to seep underneath the retina, separating it from the RPE. The degeneration of the vitreous body with age, leading to posterior vitreous detachment (PVD), is one of the main drivers of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD), the most common form of RD [1]. The main risk factors for RRD are retinal tears, myopia, and previous cataract surgery [5]. Other risk factors include vitreoretinal adhesions in association with PVD and local ocular conditions such as retinoschisis, previous trauma, and vitreoretinopathies, such as the Stickler syndrome [1]. TRDs occur as a consequence of various retinal pathologies but are most commonly associated with proliferative diabetic retinopathy [PDR] [6]. ERD occurs due to inflammatory, infectious, infiltrative, neoplastic, vascular, and degenerative conditions that may be associated with blood–retinal barrier breakdown [7].
Various studies have researched the role of seasonal variation in the occurrence of RRD [8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15]. However, the results are not unanimous, as some studies report RRD incidence with a summer peak and a winter trough [9,10,11,12] and others note a winter peak and a summer trough [8], and in some studies, no seasonal variation was found [13,14,15]. The differing results across studies emphasise the importance of exploring a range of factors—environmental, biological, and behavioural—that might influence the seasonal patterns seen in retinal detachment cases. Factors like temperature, light exposure, and atmospheric pressure have been suggested as possible contributors, with temperature changes potentially affecting the liquefaction of the vitreous and the development of PVD [16]. However, the precise mechanisms behind these seasonal variations remain unclear, and further research is needed to better understand their role.
Given these uncertainties, this review seeks to provide a comprehensive overview of the current literature on the seasonality of retinal detachment. By examining studies from various regions and climates, we aim to uncover the potential influence of geographic and weather-related factors on RD incidence. Our goal is to highlight the complex interaction of these elements and offer insights that can guide future research and clinical practice.

2. Methods

2.1. Search Strategy

We carried out a thorough and structured search of the literature to find studies that explored the seasonal variation in retinal detachment (RD). To ensure we captured a wide range of relevant studies, we used a mix of free-text keywords and Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms. The specific terms we focused on included “seasonality”, “seasonal variations”, “retinal detachment”, and “RD”. This approach allowed us to identify studies looking at both direct and indirect links between environmental factors and RD incidence.
We did not limit our search by publication date, ensuring we gathered as many studies as possible across different time periods. Additionally, we included articles in any language, as long as they had an English, French, or German abstract or translation available. The search strategy was refined multiple times to make sure we included all relevant studies while minimising irrelevant results.

2.2. Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria

2.2.1. Inclusion Criteria:

Studies in which the population of interest were patients with retinal detachment.
Retrospective or prospective studies.
Studies that discussed the seasonality of the retinal detachments included in the respective study.

2.2.2. Exclusion Criteria:

Studies without accessible full-text manuscripts or abstracts.
Case reports, editorials, and review articles were excluded, though relevant reviews were used to identify additional primary studies.

2.3. Study Selection

After the initial search, 2379 studies were identified. Titles and abstracts were screened by two independent reviewers to assess their relevance. Disagreements between reviewers were resolved through discussion, and a third reviewer was consulted when necessary.

2.4. Data Extraction

Data were extracted from each included study, focusing on the sample size, the study design, and the seasonal variation (if any) in the retinal detachments (peaks and troughs).

4. Discussion and Synthesis of Findings

Retinal detachment is a serious retinal condition globally that can lead to blindness if left untreated. Prompt identification of the condition greatly enhances the likelihood of a successful repair and vision improvement [30]. The annual incidence of RD is approximately 7–14 per 100,000 cases [22,31], though this rate varies greatly across different geographic locations, ethnicities, age groups, and patient anatomical characteristics such as myopia [16]. Additionally, a seasonal variation in RD incidence has been proposed by many authors in recent years. To indicate the scale of seasonal variation, we provide the following quantitative data: Laatikainen et al. [10] reported a significant seasonal variation in Finland with the incidence of RD peaking in the summer months, specifically in June and July. The variation was statistically significant (x2 = 12.98, p < 0.005). Bertelmann et al. [17], in Germany, observed peaks in July and troughs in October, with a statistical significance of p = 0.008. In Belgium, Weekers [18] identified that 31% of cases occurred in summer, 30% in spring, 21% in autumn, and 18% in winter. Conversely, Al Samarrai et al. [8] reported the highest incidence in Kuwait during the coldest winter months (p = 0.0453).
Finnish summers and Kuwaiti winters present stark contrasts in climate and environmental conditions, yet both show seasonal peaks in RD incidence. Finnish summers feature prolonged daylight hours and higher temperatures, which may accelerate vitreous liquefaction and posterior vitreous detachment (PVD). Conversely, Kuwaiti winters, characterised by cooler temperatures (Kuwait experiences milder and more pleasant weather during the winter months compared to extremely high summer temperatures), might see increased outdoor activities, leading to trauma-induced RD. These findings suggest that environmental and behavioural factors interact uniquely in different climates, emphasising the multifactorial nature of RD seasonality.
All of the reviewed studies, which were conducted in different regions and time periods, attempted to identify any significant differences in the frequency of retinal detachments across the seasons. However, the reported results highlight considerable variability, reflecting the complex interplay of environmental, biological, and behavioural factors. More specifically, a higher incidence of RD during warmer seasons was noted in studies conducted in France [20], Asia [25], Finland [10,11], Germany [12,17], Spain [21], Lebanon [27], Taiwan [28], Belgium [18], and Italy [9]. On the other hand, a study from Kuwait observed a peak incidence of RD during the coldest winter months [8]. There were also studies that failed to reveal a significant difference between the seasons from Australia [29], China [14,24], Turkey [22], Croatia [15], Sweden [13], Japan [26], and the United States [23]. While summer peaks dominate in northern climates, there is a report by Al Samarrai et al. [8] that observed a higher incidence of RD in the colder winter months in Kuwait. Although it is the result of only one study, we believe that warmer regions may have a higher RRD incidence in winter, possibly due to seasonal shifts in outdoor activities and temperature tolerance.
Furthermore, eleven of the aforementioned studies, in order to thoroughly examine the seasonal variation in retinal detachments, included in their evaluation specific meteorological factors like temperature, humidity, precipitation, atmospheric pressure, and sunlight exposure. Again, the results of the studies were contradictory regarding the effect of environmental factors on the incidence of RD. No association was indicated between the meteorological factors and the frequency of RD in four of the studies [15,17,19,27], whereas in some studies, a positive correlation was noted with increased temperature [25,28], greater sunlight exposure [9,12,21,25], and humidity [25]. Oppositely, Al Sammarai et al. observed a negative correlation with temperature and average sunlight exposure [8]. Lastly, atmospheric pressure was inversely associated with RD incidence by Lin et al. [28] and Lida et al. [26]. Hence, the above studies have suggested that environmental factors may contribute to the onset of RD, possibly explaining its higher incidence during certain months. Nevertheless, the results were inconclusive due to their conflicting nature.
Several mechanisms involving environmental factors have been proposed to justify the seasonal variation in the occurrence of retinal detachments; however, their confirmation is still awaited. It is widely accepted, however, that events such as liquefaction, traction, and detachment of the vitreous and intraocular fluid movement, along with deterioration of retinal adhesion, play key roles in RD [1,32]. Retinal adhesion, defined as the apposition of the neurosensory retina to the RPE, is maintained through mechanical and metabolic forces. Mechanical forces include oncotic pressures, properties of interphotoreceptor matrix, and interdigitations of RPE, while metabolic forces are mainly processed through oxygenation via the RPE pump and the release of lysosomal enzymes [1]. These physiological properties can be disrupted by environmental factors [16].
The most frequently examined meteorological factors influencing the onset of RD are elevated temperature and extreme exposure to UV light [28]. First of all, higher temperatures are thought to cause retinal damage by affecting the vitreous viscosity, leading to posterior vitreous detachment [33,34]. Specifically, it has been suggested that increased temperatures cause dehydration, leading to the disruption of osmotic pressures between the blood circulation and the tissues of the eye. This may alter the volume of the vitreous, causing shrinkage and ultimately detachment. However, the occurrence of acute vitreous detachment through this process has not been fully elucidated [25]. In contrast, lower temperatures have been proven in animal models to strengthen the adhesion of the retina [35,36].
Moreover, UV light has been found to cause posterior vitreous detachment through vitreous liquefaction due to free radical action and destabilisation of glycosaminoglycans in the interphotoreceptor matrix [25,37,38]. Daylight and temperature are also known to affect cortisol levels in the blood circulation and retina. Hence, during summer months, the concentration of cortisol in the retina decreases [39,40]. Low subretinal cortisol levels have been implicated to some extent in the destabilisation of retinal adhesion by disrupting the glycosaminoglycan matrix and inhibiting the blockage of RPE lysosomal enzymes [9,10].
As mentioned earlier, vitreoretinal traction is a well-known risk factor for RRD [1]. Therefore, conditions that may increase vitreous movement and subsequent traction are believed to contribute to the occurrence of retinal detachment. These conditions include excessive eye rubbing related to ocular surface disease and seasonal allergies [27,41,42], which have been observed to increase during the spring and summer months, as well as excessive physical activity [11]. In a review, Kriebel et al. highlight the part hard lifting plays in the development of RD [43]. In a case–control study, Mattioli et al. included 99 myopic controls and 61 cases of RD and myopia [44]. According to the study, hard lifting was associated with a higher chance of developing RD (odds ratio = 4.4 [95% CI = 1.5–13] compared to no lifting). Furthermore, Farioli et al. concluded that heavy occupational lifting is a risk factor for RRD based on data from a Swedish cohort of 43,321 males [45].
A summary of all the possible mechanisms is given below. Elevated temperatures have been proposed to increase vitreous liquefaction, potentially accelerating posterior vitreous detachment (PVD). This process involves dehydration and disruption of osmotic pressures, altering vitreous volume and increasing traction forces on the retina [25,33,34]. High UV light exposure may lead to vitreous destabilisation through free radical damage to glycosaminoglycans, contributing to retinal detachment [25,37]. Seasonal variations in cortisol levels, influenced by temperature and daylight, may weaken retinal adhesion by disrupting the glycosaminoglycan matrix and interfering with the regulation of lysosomal enzymes [9,10,39,40]. Low atmospheric pressure, observed in some studies to correlate with higher RD rates [26,28], might impact the dynamics of intraocular fluid movement and vitreoretinal adhesion.
All these mechanisms seem to play a cumulative role in the occurrence of retinal detachments, possibly ultimately influencing their seasonal variation.
It should be noted that seasonal trends exhibit significant fluctuation depending on the region. Examining these trends in a variety of geographical areas reveals clear seasonal peaks in the incidence of RD, especially in areas like France [20], Finland [10,11], and Spain [21], where the incidence of RD cases is lower in the winter and significantly higher in the summer. Variations in temperature, light exposure, and atmospheric pressure may contribute to the occurrence of RD, as these regional patterns may be impacted by local environmental and lifestyle factors.
For example, variations in temperature have been proposed as possible causes of RD seasonality. In their evaluation of a number of meteorological factors, Barioulet et al. discovered that high temperatures may hasten the vitreous humour’s liquefaction, thereby raising the risk of PVD during warmer months H [19]. The vitreoretinal interface may also be impacted by variations in atmospheric pressure, as some studies have found a relationship between higher RD rates and lower atmospheric pressures [16,19]. These results raise the possibility that weather and climate may physiologically affect vitreous dynamics and structure, which calls for more research. Another impact could be the amount of sunlight, which fluctuates greatly depending on the season.
In regions with higher seasonal variability in daylight hours, increased exposure to sunlight during the summer may correspond to a higher rate of outdoor activities, which could elevate the risk of minor ocular trauma or increase visual demands, both of which may contribute to RD development [16,21].
Moreover, aspects connected to behaviour and activity might be significant. Higher levels of physical activity are frequently associated with regions where the prevalence of RD rises during warmer months. In these situations, a higher risk of retinal tears or mild traumas that could predispose people to RD could be attributed to an increase in outdoor sports and activities. The prevalence of RD in these areas lends credence to the idea that seasonal changes in lifestyle can raise the risk of RD, particularly when paired with environmental factors like more sunshine and warmer temperatures. However, a number of studies conducted in places like Sweden and Japan show no significant seasonal change in the prevalence of RD, indicating that regional variations in environment, lifestyle, or even genetics may lessen or obscure seasonal effects [13,26]. This lack of seasonal variability highlights the complex interaction of behavioural and environmental factors in RD seasonality and suggests that the influence of weather may not be universally applicable.
Seasonal bias due to healthcare system accessibility and reporting practices may also contribute to the observed variation in RD incidence. Regions with fluctuating healthcare availability—either from seasonal closures, staff shortages, or access issues during extreme weather—may report fewer cases during these periods. For instance, individuals in rural or underserved areas may delay seeking care during winter months, potentially resulting in a lower reported incidence of RD that does not reflect actual occurrence rates. Additionally, reporting biases can arise if certain providers more rigorously record cases at specific times of year, such as following holiday periods. This could create the appearance of seasonal trends where none exist. Additionally, research from nations with consistent and universal access to healthcare, like Sweden and Japan, indicates that there is no discernible seasonal variation in the incidence of RD, indicating that reported seasonal trends may be influenced by healthcare accessibility [13,26]. These factors emphasise how crucial it is to take the healthcare system and reporting biases into account when analysing seasonal patterns in RD, since they have the potential to mask or overstate actual seasonal impacts.
Many studies fail to standardise their methodologies, including variations in defining seasonal periods and meteorological factors. This complicates cross-regional comparisons and underscores the need for multicentre studies with unified protocols to clarify the role of environmental influences on RD. Additionally, inconsistent reporting practices and varying healthcare access between regions may contribute to the conflicting findings. Addressing these methodological challenges will be critical for future research to provide clearer insights into the seasonal variation in RD. It should also be stated that although numerous studies have investigated the relationship between biological and meteorological factors and the incidence of retinal detachment, none of these factors have been definitively proven to cause seasonal variations or an overall increase in RD cases. The associations observed in the reviewed studies remain correlational, with mechanisms largely hypothesised rather than empirically validated.
Future research on the seasonality of retinal detachment (RD) should aim to address key limitations in the current literature, focusing on enhancing both the geographic scope and methodological rigour of studies. To comprehensively understand how specific environmental factors—such as temperature fluctuations, atmospheric pressure changes, and variations in sunlight exposure—may influence RD incidence, longitudinal, multiregional studies are warranted. Such studies, spanning diverse climates and healthcare systems, would facilitate a more granular analysis of seasonal patterns and environmental determinants across populations. In addition, there is a need for controlled investigations that isolate individual meteorological factors, employing both experimental and observational methods, to delineate the mechanisms through which these variables may affect RD incidence. This approach would enable a clearer understanding of the precise impact of each factor, which remains ambiguous in current research. The role of behavioural patterns and physical activity levels, particularly in warmer months associated with increased RD incidence, also requires further exploration. Studies that correlate specific behavioural data—such as participation in outdoor activities, screen exposure, and minor ocular traumas—with RD incidence could provide critical insights into how lifestyle factors contribute to seasonal variations in RD risk. Healthcare system accessibility and reporting practices are additional variables that may introduce seasonal bias in RD data, and future studies should incorporate these factors as covariates, especially in rural or seasonally isolated regions. Investigating how healthcare availability and variability in reporting influence the perceived seasonality of RD would yield a more accurate understanding of its true epidemiology.
Moreover, examining genetic and ethnic factors may elucidate geographical differences in RD incidence, as genetic predispositions influencing vitreoretinal health could modulate the impact of seasonal environmental exposures. Multigenerational studies or population-specific cohort analyses could provide valuable data on potential genetic contributions to seasonal trends in RD.
Finally, the development of predictive models for RD risk, based on seasonal patterns and associated behavioural and environmental variables, would be beneficial. Such models could support healthcare systems in pre-emptively identifying periods of increased RD risk, thereby facilitating timely preventative measures and optimising clinical resource allocation. These proposed research directions underscore the need for a multidimensional approach to unravel the complexities of RD seasonality.
Although findings vary across regions and studies, this review provides a comprehensive synthesis of the seasonal trends in RD. By consolidating diverse evidence, it highlights the need for standardised methodologies to reveal the complex interplay between environmental, biological, and behavioural factors. Such efforts will inform preventative strategies and optimise clinical outcomes.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, G.D.P. methodology: G.N.T. and E.A.; software, E.A. and G.D.P.; validation, G.D.P., F.T., I.V., E.P.P., G.N.T. and E.A.; formal analysis, G.N.T., E.A., E.P.P., I.V. and M.T.; investigation, G.N.T.; resources, E.A.; data curation, G.N.T., E.A. and M.T.; writing—original draft preparation, G.N.T. and E.A.; writing—review and editing, G.D.P., M.T., F.T., E.P.P. and I.V.; visualization, G.D.P. and M.T.; supervision, G.D.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest related to this work.

References

  1. Ghazi, N.G.; Green, W.R. Pathology and pathogenesis of retinal detachment. Eye 2002, 16, 411–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Marmor, M. Mechanisms of normal retinal adhesion. Retina 2012, 3, 1895–1897. [Google Scholar]
  3. Foulds, W.S. The vitreous in retinal detachment. Trans. Ophthalmol. Soc. 1975, 95, 412–416. [Google Scholar]
  4. Osterlin, S. On the molecular biology of the vitreous in the aphakic eye. Acta Ophthalmol. 1977, 55, 353–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Schick, T.; Heimann, H.; Schaub, F. Retinal detachment part 1-epidemiology, risk factors, clinical characteristics, diagnostic approach. Klin. Monbl Augenheilkd. 2020, 237, 1479–1491. [Google Scholar]
  6. Solinski, M.A.; Mylvaganam, H.; Adenwalla, M.; Ghadiali, Q. 13. Tractional retinal detachments. Dis. Mon. 2021, 67, 101142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Amer, R.; Nalcı, H.; Yalçındağ, N. Exudative retinal detachment. Surv. Ophthalmol. 2017, 62, 723–769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Al Samarrai, A.R. Seasonal variations of retinal detachment among arabs in kuwait. Ophthalmic Res. 1990, 22, 220–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Ghisolfi, A.; Vandelli, G.; Marcoli, F. Seasonal variations in rhegmatogenous retinal detachment as related to meteorological factors. Ophthalmol. J. Int. D’ophtalmologie. Int. J. Ophthalmol. Z. Augenheilkd. 1986, 192, 97–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Laatikainen, L.; Tolppanen, E.M.; Harju, H. Epidemiology of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment in a finnish population. Acta Ophthalmol. 1985, 63, 59–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Paavola, M.; Chehova, S.; Forsius, H. Seasonal variations in retinal detachment in northern finland and novosibirsk. Acta Ophthalmol. 1983, 61, 806–812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Thelen, U.; Gerding, H.; Clemens, S. [rhegmatogenous retinal detachments. Seasonal variation and incidence]. Ophthalmol. Z. Dtsch. Ophthalmol. Ges. 1997, 94, 638–641. [Google Scholar]
  13. Tornquist, R.; Stenkula, S.; Tornquist, P. Retinal detachment. A study of a population-based patient material in sweden 1971–1981. I. Epidemiology. Acta Ophthalmol. 1987, 65, 213–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Zou, H.; Zhang, X.; Xu, X.; Wang, X.; Liu, K.; Ho, P.C. Epidemiology survey of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment in beixinjing district, shanghai, china. Retina 2002, 22, 294–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Ivanisevic, M.; Erceg, M.; Eterovic, D. Rhegmatogenous retinal detachment and seasonal variations. Acta Medica Croat. Casopis. Hravatske Akad. Med. Znan. 2002, 56, 49–51. [Google Scholar]
  16. Mitry, D.; Charteris, D.G.; Fleck, B.W.; Campbell, H.; Singh, J. The epidemiology of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: Geographical variation and clinical associations. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2010, 94, 678–684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Bertelmann, T.; Cronauer, M.; Stoffelns, B.; Sekundo, W. Seasonal variation in the occurrence of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment at the beginning of the 21st century. Study results and literature review. Ophthalmol. Z. Dtsch. Ophthalmol. Ges. 2011, 108, 1155–1163. [Google Scholar]
  18. Weekers, R. Variations saisonnières de la frequence du décollement essential de la rétine [Seasonal variations in the frequency of essential retinal detachment]. Ophthalmologica 1945, 110, 218–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Barioulet, L.; Rueter, M.; Sentis, V.; Fournie, P.; Mrozek, S.; Meligne, D.; Moulis, G.; Sommet, A.; Soler, V. Meteorological factors and rhegmatogenous retinal detachment in metropolitan france. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 18857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Ben Ghezala, I.; Mariet, A.S.; Benzenine, E.; Gabrielle, P.H.; Baudin, F.; Bron, A.M.; Quantin, C.; Creuzot-Garcher, C.P. Incidence of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment in france from 2010 to 2016: Seasonal and geographical variations. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2022, 106, 1093–1097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Sevillano Torrado, C.; Viso, E.; Moreira, S.; Blanco, M.J.; Gude, F. Rhegmatogenous retinal detachment and solar radiation in northwestern spain. Ophthalmologica. J. Int. D’ophtalmologie. Int. J. Ophthalmol. Z. Augenheilkd. 2020, 243, 51–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Erdol, H.; Uzlu, D.; Kola, M. Characteristics and seasonal variations of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment in the eastern black sea region of turkey: 8-year results. Turk. J. Ophthalmol. 2020, 50, 94–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Shaheen, A.R.; Ashkenazy, N.; Iyer, P.G.; Flynn, H.W., Jr.; Sridhar, J.; Yannuzzi, N.A. Nationwide demographic disparities in united states emergency department visits in patients with rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Retina 2023, 43, 1936–1944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Li, X. Incidence and epidemiological characteristics of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment in beijing, china. Ophthalmology 2003, 110, 2413–2417. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  25. Prabhu, P.B.; Raju, K.V. Seasonal variation in the occurrence of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Asia Pac. J. Ophthalmol. 2016, 5, 122–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Iida, M.; Horiguchi, H.; Katagiri, S.; Shirakashi, Y.; Yamada, Y.; Gunji, H.; Nakano, T. Association of meteorological factors with the frequency of primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment in japan. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 9559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Mansour, A.M.; Hamam, R.N.; Sibai, T.A.; Farah, T.I.; Mehio-Sibai, A.; Kanaan, M. Seasonal variation of retinal detachment in lebanon. Ophthalmic Res. 2009, 41, 170–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Lin, H.C.; Chen, C.S.; Keller, J.J.; Ho, J.D.; Lin, C.C.; Hu, C.C. Seasonality of retinal detachment incidence and its associations with climate: An 11-year nationwide population-based study. Chronobiol. Int. 2011, 28, 942–948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Manners, S.; Ng, J.Q.; Kemp-Casey, A.; Chow, K.; Kang, C.Y.; Preen, D.B. Retinal detachment surgery in western australia (2000–2013): A whole-population study. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2017, 101, 1679–1682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Sharma, H.; Joshi, S.N.; Shrestha, J.K. Anatomical and functional outcomes of surgery of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Nepal. J. Ophthalmol. Biannu. Peer-Rev. Acad. J. Nepal. Ophthalmic Soc. NEPJOPH 2010, 2, 132–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Haimann, M.H.; Burton, T.C.; Brown, C.K. Epidemiology of retinal detachment. Arch. Ophthalmol. 1982, 100, 289–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Steel, D.; Fraser, S. Retinal detachment. BMJ Clin. Evid. 2008, 2008, 0710. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  33. Chen, K.; Weiland, J.D. Relationship between vitreous temperature and posterior vitreous detachment. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 2013, 26, 54–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Rahman, R.; Ikram, K.; Rosen, P.H.; Cortina-Borja, M.; Taylor, M.E. Do climatic variables influence the development of posterior vitreous detachment? Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2002, 86, 829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Endo, E.G.; Yao, X.Y.; Marmor, M.F. Pigment adherence as a measure of retinal adhesion: Dependence on temperature. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 1988, 29, 1390–1396. [Google Scholar]
  36. Yao, X.Y.; Hageman, G.S.; Marmor, M.F. Retinal adhesiveness in the monkey. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 1994, 35, 744–748. [Google Scholar]
  37. Uehara, F.; Yasumura, D.; LaVail, M.M. Rod- and cone-associated interphotoreceptor matrix in the rat retina. Differences in light-evoked distributional changes. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 1991, 32, 285–292. [Google Scholar]
  38. Akiba, J.; Ueno, N.; Chakrabarti, B. Mechanisms of photo-induced vitreous liquefaction. Curr. Eye Res. 1994, 13, 505–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Gartner, J.; Schicketanz, K.H.; Sinterhauf, K.; Bohm, G. Seasonal variations on the occurrence of idiopathic retinal detachment and on the cortisol concentration of subretinal fluid (author’s transl). Klin. Monatsblatter Augenheilkd. 1977, 171, 506–519. [Google Scholar]
  40. Weitzman, E.D.; deGraaf, A.S.; Sassin, J.F.; Hansen, T.; Godtlibsen, O.B.; Perlow, M.; Hellman, L. Seasonal patterns of sleep stages and secretion of cortisol and growth hormone during 24 hour periods in northern norway. Acta Endocrinol. 1975, 78, 65–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Sunwoo, Y.; Chou, C.; Takeshita, J.; Murakami, M.; Tochihara, Y. Physiological and subjective responses to low relative humidity. J. Physiol. Anthropol. 2006, 25, 7–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Hida, T.; Tano, Y.; Okinami, S.; Ogino, N.; Inoue, M. Multicenter retrospective study of retinal detachment associated with atopic dermatitis. Jpn. J. Ophthalmol. 2000, 44, 407–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Kriebel, D.; Sama, S.R.; Bradbury, M.; Buchholz, B.; Curti, S.; Daines, B.; Deliso, K.; DeVries, R.; Fleckner, T.; Gore, R.; et al. Risk factors for retinal detachment: A case-control study. J. Occup. Environ. Med. 2020, 62, 445–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Mattioli, S.; De Fazio, R.; Buiatti, E.; Truffelli, D.; Zanardi, F.; Curti, S.; Cooke, R.M.; Baldasseroni, A.; Miglietta, B.; Bonfiglioli, R.; et al. Physical exertion (lifting) and retinal detachment among people with myopia. Epidemiology 2008, 19, 868–871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Farioli, A.; Kriebel, D.; Mattioli, S.; Kjellberg, K.; Hemmingsson, T. Occupational lifting and rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: A follow-up study of swedish conscripts. Occup. Environ. Med. 2017, 74, 489–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Article Metrics

Citations

Article Access Statistics

Journal Statistics
Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.
Download PDF
Morpho-Physiological Adaptations of Rice Cultivars Under Heavy Metal Stress: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Previous
Malignant Melanoma of the Tongue: A Scoping Review
Next