Abstract
Convex inequalities and fuzzy-valued calculus converge to form a comprehensive mathematical framework that can be employed to understand and analyze a broad spectrum of issues. This paper utilizes fuzzy Aumman’s integrals to establish integral inequalities of Hermite-Hahadard, Fejér, and Pachpatte types within up and down (·) relations and over newly defined class ·-ħ-Godunova–Levin convex fuzzy-number mappings. To demonstrate the unique properties of ·-relations, recent findings have been developed using fuzzy Aumman’s, as well as various other fuzzy partial order relations that have notable deficiencies outlined in the literature. Several compelling examples were constructed to validate the derived results, and multiple notes were provided to illustrate, depending on the configuration, that this type of integral operator generalizes several previously documented conclusions. This endeavor can potentially advance mathematical theory, computational techniques, and applications across various fields.
Keywords:
U·D-ħ–Godunova–Levin convex fuzzy-number mappings; Ostrowski’s inequality; fuzzy Hermite-Hadamard type inequalities MSC:
26A33; 26A51; 26D10
1. Introduction
In recent years, numerous scholars in analysis and various branches of mathematics have shown a growing interest in inequality theory [,]. Many real-world problems can be viewed as integral equations, emphasizing the importance of generalizing integral inequalities to address such issues [].
In Moore’s renowned book, the introductory chapter provides an interactive exploration of numerical data, serving as an initiation to interval analysis in numerical analysis (refer to []). Over the last five decades, numerous applications have emerged across various domains, including interval differential equations, computer graphics, aero elasticity, and optimization of neural networks. Recently, several authors have extensively investigated various integral inequalities within the context of interval-valued functions (refer to [,,]).
It is widely acknowledged that the convexity of functions plays a pivotal role in numerous scientific disciplines, encompassing probability theory, economics, and optimal control theory. Moreover, various inequalities have been extensively documented in the literature (refer to [,]). The subsequent inequality is commonly known as the classical Hermite-Hadamard inequality regarding equality:
If is a convex function defined on the interval of real numbers, and with , then
Both inequalities are valid in the opposite direction if f exhibits concavity.
Varosanec initially introduced the concept of ℎ-convexity in 2007 (refer to []), exploring various generalizations and extensions of this inequality (refer to []). Several authors have subsequently developed more intricate Hermite-Hadamard inequalities involving ℎ-convex functions (refer to [,]). Moreover, Costa proposed a Jensen-type inequality for fuzzy interval-valued functions (refer to []). In the realm of interval-valued functions, Zhao et al. presented a novel Hermite-Hadamard inequality for ℎ-convex functions (refer to []).
Using the ℎ-Godunova–Levin function (refer to [,]), Almutairi and Kiliman demonstrated the following inequality in 2019.
If is a convex function defined on the interval of real numbers, and with , then
where, such that .
Several mathematicians have expanded upon the Ostrowski inequality in various directions. Notably, several scientific articles have delved into this topic, exploring different forms of convexity. For instance, İşcan et al. [] investigated the concept of a harmonically s-convex function. Set [] introduced the fractional version of the Ostrowski-type inequality using Riemann–Liouville fractional operators. Liu [] utilized the equality established by Set to devise new refinements of the Ostrowski-type inequality for an MT-convex function. Tunç [] examined the Ostrowski-type inequality for an ℏ-convex function. Ozdemir et al. [] derived a fresh version of the Ostrowski-type inequality for an (α, m)-convex function. Agarwal et al. [] explored a more generalized Ostrowski-type inequality using a Raina fractional integral operator. Sarikaya et al. [,] employed local fractional integrals to establish new generalizations of the Ostrowski-type inequality. Gürbuz et al. [,] utilized a Katugampola fractional operator for a generalized version of the Ostrowski inequality. Ahmad et al. [,] introduced some innovative generalizations of the Ostrowski inequality via an Atangana–Baleanu fractional operator for differentiable convex functions and for harmonical convexity, see [,,,]. For further details on recent advancements in the Ostrowski-type inequality, readers are referred to the following references (refer to [,,]). Budak et al. [] derived innovative fractional inequalities of the Ostrowski type for interval-valued functions, drawing on the definitions of gH-derivatives. Basic concepts related to fuzzy and fuzzy Aumman’s integral are in the following literature (see [,] and the references therein). Nanda [] introduced the concept of convexity in fuzzy environment. For interval-valued convex mapping, see []. Khan et al. [] introduced log-h-convex fuzzy-interval-valued functions as a distinct class of convex fuzzy-interval-valued functions, employing a fuzzy order relation. This class facilitated the establishment of Jensen and Hermite-Hadamard inequalities (see [,,,,] and the references therein).
Naturally, numerous researchers have extensively explored and examined Ostrowski’s and Hermite-Hadamard inequalities in a novel context via newly defined class of · –Godunova–Levin convex fuzzy-number mappings. Consequently, several extensions and improvements have been developed. For example, refer to [,,,] and the references therein. In this investigation, we propose some further adjustments to Fejér, Pachpatte, and Ostrowski’s integral inequalities via ·-–Godunova–Levin convexity and fuzzy Aumman’s integrals.
2. Preliminaries
Consider as the set comprising all closed and bounded intervals of , and let belong to , defined as:
It is named a positive interval if . The Definition of , which represents the set of all positive intervals, is
Let and be defined by
Subsequently, the Minkowski difference , addition , and multiplication for belong to are delineated as follows:
Remark 1.
(i) For given the relation defined on by if and only if for all is a partial interval inclusion relation. The relation is coincident to on It can be easily seen that “” looks like “up and down” on the real line so we call “up and down” (or “” order, in short) []. For the Hausdorff–Pompeiu distance between intervals and is defined by
It is a familiar fact that is a complete metric space [,,].
We will briefly review some essential concepts regarding fuzzy sets and fuzzy numbers since we will rely on the standard definitions of these sets.
Please note that we refer to and as the set of all fuzzy subsets and fuzzy numbers of .
Given , the level sets or cut sets are given by for all and by . These sets are known as -level sets or -cut sets of , see [].
Proposition 1 ([]).
Let . Then, relation is given on by when and only when , for every which are left- and right-order relations.
Proposition 2 ([]).
Let . Then, relation is given on by when and only when for every which is the order relation on .
Remember the approaching notions, which are offered in the literature. If and , then, for every the arithmetic operations addition “, multiplication “, and scaler multiplication “ are defined by
over .
Aumann Integrals for Interval and Fuzzy Number Mappings
Now we define and discuss some properties of Aumann integrals for interval and ··s.
Definition 1 ([]).
If is an interval-valued mapping () satisfying that , then is an Aumann integrable over when and only when and both are lebesgue integrable over such that
The literature suggests the following conclusions, see [,,]:
Definition 2 ([]).
A fuzzy-interval-valued map is named ···. For each its s are classified according to their -levels are given by for all Here, for each the end point real mappings are called lower and upper mappings of .
Definition 3.
Let be an ···. Then, fuzzy integral of over denoted by , is given level-wise by
for all where denotes the collection of Riemannian integrable mappings of s. The ··· is -integrable over if Note that, if are Lebesgue-integrable, then is fuzzy Aumann-integrable mapping over , see [].
Theorem 1 ([]).
Let be an ···, it’s s are classified according to their -levels are given by for all and for all Then, is -integrable over if and only if, and are both -integrable over . Moreover, if is -integrable over then
for all For all denotes the collection of all -integrable ···s
The family of all -integrable ··s over are denoted by
Breckner discussed the coming emerging idea of interval-valued convexity in [].
A ·· is called convex ·· if
for all , where is the collection of all real valued intervals. If (16) is reversed, then is called concave.
Definition 4 ([]).
The ·· is called convex ·· on if
for all where for all If (17) is reversed then, is called concave ·· on . is affine if and only if it is both convex and concave ··.
3. Hermite-Hadamard Inequalities over ·--Godunova–Levin Convex ··
In this section, we start with the main Definition of ·--Godunova–Levin convexity over fuzzy domain that will be helpful for the upcoming results. The fuzzy valued Hermite-Hadamard inequalities for ·--Godunova–Levin convex ··s are established in this section. Additionally, several instances are provided to support the theory produced in this study’s application.
Definition 5.
Let be convex set and such that . Then ·· is said to be ·--Godunova–Levin convex on if
for all where The ·· is said to be ·--Godunova–Levin concave on if inequality (21) is reversed. Moreover, is known as ·--Godunova–Levin affine ·· on if
for all where
Remark 2.
The ·--Godunova–Levin convex ··s have some very nice properties similar to convex ··.
- (1)
- if is ·--Godunova–Levin convex ··, then is also ·--Godunova–Levin convex for .
- (2)
- if and both are ·--Godunova–Levin convex ··s, then is also ·--Godunova–Levin convex ··.
Here, we will go through a few unique exceptional cases of · -Godunova–Levin convex ··s:
- (i)
- If then ·--Godunova–Levin convex ·· becomes ·--Godunova–Levin convex ··, that is
- (ii)
- If then ·--Godunova–Levin convex ·· becomes ·-Godunova–Levin convex ··, see [], that is
- (iii)
- If then ·--Godunova–Levin convex ·· becomes ·-Godunova–Levin ··, that isNote that, there are also new special cases (i) and (iii) as well.
Theorem 2.
Let be convex set, non-negative real valued function such that and let be a ··, it’s s are classified according to their -levels such that, are given by
for all and for all . Then is ·--Godunova–Levin convex on if and only if, for all is -Godunova–Levin convex and is -Godunova–Levin concave.
Proof.
Assume that for each and are -Godunova–Levin convex and -Godunova–Levin concave on , respectively. Then, we have
and
Then by (18), (5) and (6), we obtain
that is
Hence, is ·--Godunova–Levin convex ·· on .
Conversely, let is ·--Godunova–Levin convex ·· on Then, for all and we have Therefore, from (23), we have
Again, from (18), (5) and (6), we obtain
for all and Then by ·--Godunova–Levin convexity of , we have for all and such that
and
for each Hence, the result follows. □
Remark 3.
If with then ·--Godunova–Levin convex ·· reduces to the ·--Godunova–Levin convex function.
If with and with , then ·--Godunova–Levin convex ·· reduces to the -Godunova–Levin convex function.
If with and , then ·--Godunova–Levin convex ·· reduces to the -Godunova–Levin convex function.
If with and , then ·--Godunova–Levin convex ·· reduces to the -convex function.
Example 1.
We consider for and the ·· defined by
Then, for each we have . Since end point functions are -Godunova–Levin convex and -Godunova–Levin concave functions for each , respectively. Hence is ·--Godunova–Levin convex ··.
Definition 6.
Let be a ··, it’s s are classified according to their -levels such that, are given by
for all and for all . Then, is lower -Godunova–Levin convex (upper -Godunova–Levin concave) ·· o n if and only if, for all is a -Godunova–Levin convex (-Godunova–Levin concave) mapping and is a -Godunova–Levin affine mapping.
Definition 7.
Let be a ··, it’s s are classified according to their -levels such that, are given by
for all and for all . Then, is an upper -Godunova–Levin convex (-Godunova–Levin concave) ·· on if and only if, for all is an -Godunova–Levin affine mapping and is a -Godunova–Levin convex (-Godunova–Levin concave) mapping.
Remark 4.
If , then both concepts “·--Godunova–Levin convex ··” and “-Godunova–Levin convex ··”, are behave alike when is lower ·--Godunova–Levin convex ··.
Both concepts “·--Godunova–Levin convex fuzzy number mapping”, and “-Godunova–Levinconvex interval-valued mapping” are coincident when is lower -Godunova–Levin convex ·· with .
The following result discuss the Hermite-Hadamard inequality over ·--Godunova–Levin convex ··.
Theorem 3.
Let be a ·--Godunova–Levin convex ·· with non-negative real valued function and , it’s s are classified according to their -levels such that, are given by for all and for all . If , then
If is -Godunova–Levin concave ··, then (25) is reversed.
Proof.
Let be a ·--Godunova–Levin convex ··. Then, for , we have
If , then we have
Let and . Then, above inequality we have
Therefore, for every , we have
Then
It follows that
That is
Thus,
In a similar way as above, we have
Combining (27) and (28), we have
Hence, the required result.
Note that, by using same steps, the Formula (26) can be proved with the help of -Godunova–Levin concave ··. □
Remark 5.
If , then Theorem 3 simplifies to the outcome for ·--convex ·· which is also new one:
If , then Theorem 3 simplifies to the outcome for ·-convex ·· which is also new one:
If then Theorem 3 simplifies to the outcome for ·--·· which is also new one:
If with and , then Theorem 3 simplifies to the outcome for classical convex function, see []:
If with , then Theorem 3 simplifies to the outcome for classical -convex function, see []:
If with and , then Theorem 3 simplifies to the outcome for classical -convex function, see []:
If with and , then Theorem 3 simplifies to the outcome for classical convex function:
If with and , then Theorem 3 simplifies to the outcome for classical -convex function:
Example 2.
We consider for , and the ·· defined by,
Then, for each we have . Since left and right end point mappings , are ·--Godunova–Levin convex mappings for each , then is -Godunova–Levin convex ··. We clearly see that . Now computing the following
for all That means
Similarly, it can be easily show that
for all such that
From which, we have
that is
for all
Hence,
Theorem 4.
Let be a ·--Godunova–Levin convex ·· with non-negative real valued function and it’s s are classified according to their -levels such that, are given by for all and for all . If , then
If is a -Godunova–Levin concave ··, then (38) is reversed.
where
and ,
Proof.
Take we have
Therefore, for every , we have
In consequence, we obtain
That is
It follows that
In a similar way as above, we have
Combining (40) and (41), we have
By using Theorem 3, we have
Therefore, for every , we have
that is
hence, the result follows. □
Example 3.
We consider for , and the ·· defined by, as in Example 2, then is ·--Godunova–Levin convex ··. We have and . We now compute the following:
Then we obtain that
Hence, Theorem 4 is verified.
The novel fuzzy Hermite-Hadamard inequalities for the product of two ·--Godunova–Levin convex ··s are found in the results.
Theorem 5.
Let be two ·--Godunova–Levin convex ··s with non-negative real valued functions and it’s s are classified according to their -levels such that, are given by and for all and for all . If and , then
If is -Godunova–Levin concave ··, then (42) is reversed.
where and and
Proof.
Let be two ·--Godunova–Levin convex and ·--Godunova–Levin convex ··s. Then, we have
and
and
From the Definition of ·--Godunova–Levin convex ·· it follows that and , so
Integrating both sides of above inequality over we get
It follows that,
that is
Thus,
and Theorem 5 has been established. □
Example 4.
We consider for , and the ··s defined by,
Then, for each we have and Since end point functions and , -Godunova–Levin convex functions for each . Hence both are ·-,·--Godunova–Levin convex ··s, respectively. We now computing the following
for each that means
Hence, Theorem 5 is demonstrated.
Theorem 6.
Let be two ·--Godunova–Levin convex and ·-- Godunova–Levin convex ··s with non-negative real valued functions , respectively and respectively, it’s s are classified according to their -levels such that, are given, respectively, by and for all and for all . If , then
where and and
Proof.
By hypothesis, for each we have
Integrating over we have
that is
Hence, the required result. □
Example 5.
We consider for , and the ··s as in Example 4. Then, for each we have and and, are ·--Godunova–Levin convex and ·--Godunova–Levin convex ··s, respectively. We have and ,. We now computing the following
for each that means
hence, Theorem 6 is demonstrated.
The H-H Fejér inequalities for ·--Godunova–Levin convex ··s are now presented. The second H-H Fejér inequality for ·--Godunova–Levin convex ·· is first obtained.
Theorem 7.
Let be an ·--Godunova–Levin convex ·· with , it’s s are classified according to their -levels such that, are given by for all and for all . If and symmetric with respect to then
Proof.
Let be an ·--Godunova–Levin convex ··. Then, for each we have
And
After adding (46) and (47), and integrating over we get
Since is symmetric, then
Since
Then from (49), (48) we have
that is
hence
Now, generalizing the first H-H Fejér inequalities for classical Godunova–Levin convex functions and we build the first H-H Fejér inequality for ·--Godunova–Levin convex ··. □
Theorem 8.
Let be an ·--Godunova–Levin convex ·· with , it’s s are classified according to their -levels such that, are given by for all and for all . If and symmetric with respect to and , then
Proof.
Since is an ·--Godunova–Levin convex, then for we have
Since , then by multiplying (51) by and integrate it with respect to over we obtain
Since
And
Then from (53) and (54), (52) we have
from which, we have
that is
This completes the proof. □
Remark 6.
From Theorem 7 and 8, we clearly see that:
If , then we acquire the inequality (25).
Let and . Then from (45) and (50), we acquire the following inequality, see []:
If is lower Godunova–Levin convex ·· on and then we derive the following subsequent inequality, see []:
If is lower Godunova–Levin convex ·· on with and then from (45) and (50) we derive the following subsequent inequality, see []:
If is lower Godunova–Levin convex ·· on with and , then from (45) and (50) we derive the following subsequent inequality, see []:
Let and with . Then from (45) and (50), we obtain following classical Fejér inequality.
Example 6.
We consider for , and the ·· defined by,
Then, for each we have . Since end point mappings are -Godunova–Levin convex mappings for each , then is ·--Godunova–Levin convex ··. If
then , for all . Since and . Now we compute the following:
And
From (61) and (62), we have
for all Hence, Theorem 7 is verified.
For Theorem 8, we have
From (63) and (64), we have
Hence, Theorem 8 has been verified.
4. Fuzzy Version of Ostrowski’s Type Inequality via ·--Godunova–Levin ··s
Here, an Ostrowski-type inequality was formulated in conjunction with several illustrations for Godunova-Levin functions within a broader category.
First, recalling some basic notations that will be helpful in this section such that:
Gamma and Beta functions are respectively characterized as
for
for , .
The integral representation of the hypergeometric function is
for , , .
The subsequent lemma aids in achieving our goal.
Lemma 1.
Let be a differentiable function on with , where . If is integrable over , then
Proof.
Integration by parts finalizes the proof. □
Now, employing Lemma 1, we derive the principal outcomes.
Theorem 9.
Let be a differentiable function on with , where and let be a integrable over . If is -Godunova–Levin ··s, with . If then
for all where and .
Proof.
In accordance with Lemma 1 and is -Godunova–Levin ··, for we have
and
From above equations, we have
and
As a result, we obtain
and
That is,
this completes the proof. □
5. Conclusions
Our principal objective entails applying classical integral operators and ·-relations to recent findings elucidated by the authors of the referenced works [,,]. Various forms of ·-relations, and classical integral operators, along with fuzzy Aumman’s integral operators, have been applied to derive several novel outcomes. Our primary contributions encompass the establishment of fuzzy integral inequalities of the H.H., Fejér, Pachpatte and Ostrowski’s inequalities via newly defined class ·--Godunova–Levin convex ··s. Furthermore, we provided initial clarifications on concepts related to up and down, and pseudo order relations to underscore their differences and offer commentary on key revelations. The outcomes of this research are poised to significantly influence the realms of inequality and optimization theory.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, A.A. and A.F.A.; validation, S.A. and A.F.A.; formal analysis, S.A. and A.F.A.; investigation, A.A. and M.V.C.; resources, A.A. and M.V.C.; writing—original draft, A.A. and M.V.C.; writing—review and editing, A.A., A.F.A. and S.A.; visualization, M.V.C. and A.A.; supervision, M.V.C. and A.A.; project administration, M.V.C. and A.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This research was funded by Taif University, Saudi Arabia, project No (TU-DSPP-2024-87).
Data Availability Statement
There is no data availability statement to be declared.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors claim to have no conflicts of interest.
References
- Zhao, T.H.; He, Z.Y.; Chu, Y.M. Sharp bounds for the weighted Hölder mean of the zero-balanced generalized complete elliptic integrals. Comput. Methods Funct. Theory 2021, 21, 413–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Furuichi, S. Inequalities; MDPI-Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute: Basel, Switzerland, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Kamenskii, M.; Petrosyan, G.A.R.I.K.; Wen, C.F. An existence result for a periodic boundary value problem of fractional semilinear differential equations in a Banach space. J. Nonlinear Var. Anal. 2021, 5, 155–177. [Google Scholar]
- Dwyer, P.S. Interval Analysis: By Ramon E. Moore. 145 Pages, Diagrams, 6x 9 in. New Jersey, Englewood Cliffs, Prentice-Hall, 1966. Price, 9.00. J. Frankl. Inst. 1967, 284, 148–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Z.; Ali, M.A.; Budak, H.; Sarikaya, M.Z. On Hermite-Hadamard type inequalities for interval-valued multiplicative integrals. Commun. Fac. Sci. Univ. Ank. Ser. A1 Math. Stat. 2020, 69, 1428–1448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chang, X.; Guo, J.; Qin, H.; Huang, J.; Wang, X.; Ren, P. Single-Objective and Multi-Objective Flood Interval Forecasting Considering Interval Fitting Coefficients. Water Resour. Manag. 2024, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Roman-Flores, H.; Chalco-Cano, Y.; Lodwick, W.A. Some integral inequalities for interval-valued functions. Comput. Appl. Math. 2018, 37, 1306–1318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dragomir, S.S. Inequalities of Hermite-Hadamard type for functions of self-adjoint operators and matrices. J. Math. Inequal. 2017, 11, 241–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Almutairi, A.; Kilicman, A. New refinements of the Hadamard inequality on coordinated convex function. J. Inequal. Appl. 2019, 2019, 192–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Varoşanec, S. On ℎ-convexity. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2007, 326, 303–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dragomir, S.S. Some inequalities of Hadamard type. Soochow J. Math. 1995, 21, 335–341. [Google Scholar]
- Bombardelli, M.; Varoşanec, S. Properties of ℎ-convex functions related to the Hermite-Hadamard-Fejér inequalities. Comput. Math. Appl. 2009, 58, 1869–1877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dragomir, S.S. Inequalities of hermite-hadamard type for h-convex functions on linear spaces. Proyecciones (Antofagasta) 2015, 34, 323–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Costa, T.M. Jensen’s inequality type integral for fuzzy-in terval-valued functions. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 2017, 327, 31–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, D.; An, T.; Ye, G.; Liu, W. New jensen and hermite–hadamard-type-inequalities for h-convex interval-valued functions. J. Inequal. Appl. 2018, 2018, 302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Almutairi, O.; Kilicman, A. Some integral inequalities for h-godunova-levin preinvexity. Symmetry 2019, 11, 1500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, D.; Zhao, J.; Qin, S. SVM strategy and analysis of a three-phase quasi-Z-source inverter with high voltage transmission ratio. Sci. China Technol. Sci. 2023, 66, 2996–3010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- İŞCAN, I. Ostrowski type inequalities for harmonically s-convex functions. Konuralp J. Math. 2015, 3, 63–74. [Google Scholar]
- Set, E. New inequalities of Ostrowski type for mappings whose derivatives are s-convex in the second sense via fractional integrals. Comput. Math. Appl. 2012, 63, 1147–1154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, W. Ostrowski type fractional integral inequalities for MT-convex functions. Miskolc Math. Notes 2015, 16, 249–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tunç, M. Ostrowski-type inequalities via h-convex functions with applications to special means. J. Inequal. Appl. 2013, 2013, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ozdemir, M.E.; Kavurmaci, H.; Set, E. Ostrowski’s type inequalities for (α,m)-convex function. Kyungpook Math. J. 2010, 50, 371–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Agarwal, R.P.; Luo, M.J.; Rainan, R.K. On Ostrowski type inequalities. Fasc. Math. 2016, 56, 5–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sarikaya, M.; Budak, H. Generalized Ostrowski type inequalities for local fractional integrals. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 2017, 145, 1527–1538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shi, S.; Han, D.; Cui, M. A multimodal hybrid parallel network intrusion detection model. Connect. Sci. 2023, 35, 2227780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gürbüz, M.; Tasdan, Y.; Set, E. Ostrowski type inequalities via the Katugampola fractional integrals. AIMS Math. 2020, 5, 42–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, C.; Han, D.; Shen, X. CLVIN: Complete language-vision interaction network for visual question answering. Knowl.-Based Syst. 2023, 275, 110706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ahmad, H.; Tariq, M.; Sahoo, S.K.; Askar, S.; Abouelregal, A.E.; Khedher, K.M. Refinements of Ostrowski type integral inequalities involving Atangana-Baleanu fractional integral operator. Symmetry 2021, 13, 2059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, C.; Han, D.; Chang, C.C. MPCCT: Multimodal vision-language learning paradigm with context-based compact Transformer. Pattern Recognit. 2024, 147, 110084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Iscan, I. Hermite-Hadamard type inequalities for harmonically convex functions. Hacet. J. Math. Stat. 2014, 43, 935–942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, K.; Liu, Z.; Wu, M.; Wang, C.; Shen, W.; Shao, J. Experimental study of mechanical properties of hot dry granite under thermal-mechanical couplings. Geothermics 2024, 119, 102974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dong, X.; Chen, T.; Zhou, G. Design high performance field-effect, strain/gas sensors of novel 2D penta-like Pd2P2SeX (X = O, S, Te) pin-junction nanodevices: A study of transport properties. J. Alloys Compd. 2024, 977, 173417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Macías-Díaz, J.E.; Khan, M.B.; Alrweili, H.; Soliman, M.S. Some Fuzzy Inequalities for Harmonically s-Convex Fuzzy Number Valued Functions in the Second Sense Integral. Symmetry 2022, 14, 1639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yu, Y.; Wan, M.; Qian, J.; Miao, D.; Zhang, Z.; Zhao, P. Feature selection for multi-label learning based on variable-degree multi-granulation decision-theoretic rough sets. Int. J. Approx. Reason. 2024, 169, 109181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hong, J.; Gui, L.; Cao, J. Analysis and experimental verification of the tangential force effect on electromagnetic vibration of PM motor. IEEE Trans. Energy Convers. 2023, F. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, Y.; Wang, J.; Cao, G.; Yuan, Y.; Yao, X.; Qi, L. Intelligent control of multilegged robot smooth motion: A review. IEEE Access 2023, 11, 86645–86685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Diamond, P.; Kloeden, P. Metric Spaces of Fuzzy Sets: Theory and Applications; World Scientific: Singapore, 1994. [Google Scholar]
- Goetschel, R., Jr.; Voxman, W. Elementary fuzzy calculus. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 1986, 18, 31–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kaleva, O. Fuzzy Differential Equations. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 1987, 24, 301–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nanda, N.; Kar, K. Convex fuzzy mappings. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 1992, 48, 129–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Breckner, W.W. Continuity of generalized convex and generalized concave set–valued functions. Revue D’analyse Numérique et de Théorie de L’approximation 1993, 22, 39–51. [Google Scholar]
- Khan, M.B.; Santos-García, G.; Noor, M.A.; Soliman, M.S. Some new concepts related to fuzzy fractional calculus for up and down convex fuzzy-number valued functions and inequalities. Chaos Solitons Fractals 2022, 164, 112692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moore, R.E. Interval Analysis; Prentice Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA, 1966. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, D.; Guo, C.; Chen, D.; Wang, G. Jensen’s inequalities for set-valued and fuzzy set-valued functions. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 2020, 404, 178–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kalsoom, H.; Latif, M.A.; Khan, Z.A.; Vivas-Cortez, M. Some New Hermite-Hadamard-Feje’r fractional type inequalities for h-convex and harmonically h-Convex interval-valued Functions. Mathematics 2021, 10, 74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sarikaya, M.Z.; Saglam, A.; Yildirim, H. On some Hadamard-type inequalities for h-convex functions. J. Math. Inequal. 2008, 2, 335–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Costa, T.M.; Roman-Flores, H. Some integral inequalities for fuzzy-interval-valued functions. Inf. Sci. 2017, 420, 110–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).