Abstract
This study investigated sulphide textures and trace element chemistry from the Tomingley Gold Project (TGP) region of Central-West NSW, eastern Australia, using in situ techniques. In particular, the study focused on pyrite and arsenopyrite to gain insights into ore-forming processes and determine which trace elements within these minerals can be used as potential pathfinder elements for mineral exploration in the TGP. A total of 41 drill core samples from a variety of lithologies (volcaniclastic, monzodiorite, graphitic siltstone, dacite, andesite) were described and analysed using reflected light microscopy, high-resolution microscopy (via Scanning Electron Microscope or SEM), elemental mapping (via Electron Probe Micro Analysis or EPMA) and targeted trace element analysis of sulphide grains (via Laser Ablation-Inductively Coupled Plasma-Mass Spectrometry or LA-ICP-MS). Findings show that pyrite and arsenopyrite are the major sulphides that host fracture-fill/inclusions of native gold and ‘invisible gold’. Pyrite rich in groundmass inclusions should be evaluated due to their characteristic high concentrations of both As and Au. Pyrite trace element chemistry (Sn, Bi, W, Sb, Au and Se) was able to delineate mineralised from unmineralised samples in volcaniclastics, graphitic siltstones and andesites but was much more challenging for lithologies like dacites and monzodiorites. The study also found that Au may have been introduced into the system earlier and existed as ‘invisible gold’ in earlier generations of pyrite. This study highlighted the utility of in situ techniques to discriminate mineralised signatures from unmineralised samples, and this has proven to be far more effective compared to whole-rock techniques, emphasising the benefits of such datasets in mineral exploration.