Symmetry 2017, 9(3), 28; https://doi.org/10.3390/sym9030028
On the Legibility of Mirror-Reflected and Rotated Text
Department of Psychology, University of Nevada, Reno, NV 89557, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editor: Marco Bertamini
Received: 23 December 2016 / Revised: 16 February 2017 / Accepted: 17 February 2017 / Published: 23 February 2017
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Symmetry in Vision)
Abstract
We happened to observe that text that was reflected about either the horizontal or vertical axis was more difficult to read than text that was reflected about first one and then the other, which amounts to a 180-degree rotation. In this article, we review a number of studies that examine the nature of recognizing reflected and inverted letters, and the frequency of mirror reversal errors (e.g., confusing 'b' for 'd') in children and adults. We explore recent ideas linking the acquisition of literacy with the loss of mirror-invariance, not just for text, but for objects in general. We try to connect these various literatures to examine why certain transformations of text are more difficult to read than others for adults. View Full-TextKeywords:
mirror-reversal; left-right reversal; reading; reversal errors; mirrored text
▼
Figures
Figure 1
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).
Share & Cite This Article
MDPI and ACS Style
Erlikhman, G.; Strother, L.; Barzakov, I.; Caplovitz, G.P. On the Legibility of Mirror-Reflected and Rotated Text. Symmetry 2017, 9, 28.
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.
Related Articles
Article Metrics
Comments
[Return to top]
Symmetry
EISSN 2073-8994
Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland
RSS
E-Mail Table of Contents Alert