Abstract
Based on the Hamilton canonical equations for ocean surface waves with four-five-six-wave resonance conditions, the determinate dynamical equation of four-five-six-wave resonances for ocean surface gravity waves in water with a finite depth is established, thus leading to the elimination of the nonresonant second-, third-, fourth-, and fifth-order nonlinear terms though a suitable canonical transformation. The four kernels of the equation and the 18 coefficients of the transformation are expressed in explicit form in terms of the expansion coefficients of the gravity wave Hamiltonian in integral-power series in normal variables. The possibilities of the existence of integrals of motion for the wave momentum and the wave action are discussed, particularly the special integrals for the latter. For ocean surface capillary–gravity waves on a fluid with a finite depth, the sixth-order expansion coefficients of the Hamiltonian in integral-power series in normal variables are concretely provided, thus naturally including the classical fifth-order kinetic energy expansion coefficients given by Krasitskii.
1. Introduction
The development of ocean surface wave theories has focused on the mechanism of wave–wave resonance [1,2,3,4,5]. Two integro-differential equations [6], based on this mechanism, are central to wave turbulence theory. One of them is the dynamical equation (also known as the “Zakharov equation”) [7,8], which is based on the Hamiltonian function of wave energy and the linear dispersion relation, and the other one is the kinetic equation (also known as the “Hasselmann equation”) [9,10], which is based on the wave numbers (or wave action) [7,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17]. The former is deterministic, and the latter is stochastic. The broad-banded wave turbulence theory is contrasted with the classical narrow-banded high-order Stokes waves with a nonlinear dispersion relation [18] and its extended theories; however, it is also implicated in [19,20]. At present, the wave turbulence theories of ocean surface waves are limited to the three-wave resonance of surface capillary waves in deep water [21] and the four-wave [9] and four-five-wave resonance [7] of surface gravity waves in a finite water depth. Therefore, the next step is to establish a wave turbulence theory of four-five-six-wave resonance for surface gravity waves in a finite water depth.
The existing spatial scale of the ocean can satisfy the six-wave resonance interactions. If a wave length, a wave steepness [19], and a horizontal scale of the ocean are taken as typical values, respectively, 100 m, 0.2, and m, then the number of resonance waves n is , It can be expected that the steeper the resonance waves are, the higher the order of the resonance waves are, and the higher the number of the resonance waves are until the resonance waves are broken [22]. If the effect of the surface capillary waves is considered separately [21,23], the resonant number of ocean surface capillary waves can reach infinity in a wide ocean area, which makes it possible to construct a high-order ocean surface capillary–gravity wave system with six-wave resonance. Therefore, a six-wave resonance system for ocean surface gravity waves is necessary. The fifth-order Korteweg–de Vries equation of solitary wave phenomena originating from water waves may admit an infinite number of locally propagating waves under some singular conditions [24].
It has been shown that the higher-order effect is not only possible but also observed [22]. A quite common phenomenon seen by people on the sea or river surface under the action of fresh wind comprises the so-called ’horseshoe’ or ’crescent-shaped’ patterns, which appear, owing to the class II instability for the five-wave and higher-order interactions [25,26,27]. Low-order theories sometimes distort the real physical picture and produce apparent chaos, which disappears at a higher order. Therefore, the high-order approximations of the water–wave problem are necessary [28] for reliable studies of the transition from order to chaos. In the one-dimensional case, the amplitudes of four-wave interactions in the effective Hamiltonian are exactly equal to zero, and the five-wave interaction is the first nonvanishing term [29,30], i.e., an effective five-wave Hamiltonian [31]. It is also found that the six-wave amplitude of the compact 1D Zakharov equation is not zero; that is, the equation is not integrable [32]. The high-order spectral (HOS) of numerical simulation [19] can be effective, and the theory of high-order wave resonance should be more so.
If we look at other waves besides water waves, one-dimensional six-wave resonance has already appeared in light wave turbulence [33] and quantum wave turbulence [34]. To this end, the classical dynamical equation and its kinetic equation [7] of the classical four-five-wave resonance of the surface gravity waves in a finite water depth are extended to the four-five-six-wave resonance. At the same time, the classical fifth-order expansion of the Hamiltonian in integral-power series in a normal variable for ocean surface capillary–gravity waves in a finite water depth is extended to the sixth order, thus laying a necessary foundation for the dynamical equation and its kinetic equation for surface capillary–gravity waves in a finite water depth in the future.
The nonlinear Schrödinger equations play important roles in constructing the mathematical model of ocean surface gravity waves, and they can be derived from the dynamical equations [8,19,35]. Based on the results, we can establish a fifth-order nonlinear Schrödinger equation of ocean surface gravity waves. Afterward, the corresponding abundant solutions can be obtained through various methods [36,37,38,39,40].
In this paper, we follow Krasitskii’s method to ensure that the coefficients of the two equations obtained meet the desired symmetries. The paper contains six sections. In Section 2, the sixth-order integral-power series of Hamiltonian and canonical transformation are introduced. In Section 3, the expansion of the Hamiltonian with accuracy up to the sixth-order terms for ocean surface capillary–gravity waves with a finite water depth is presented. In Section 4, the dynamical equations of ocean surface gravity wave that contain four-five-six-wave interactions and the forms of the coefficients concerning the canonical transformation are obtained. In Section 5, taking the method of quasi-Gaussian approximation, the kinetic equations of four-five-six-wave resonance for ocean surface gravity waves are established. Finally, the potential applications are discussed in Section 6.
2. Background and the Expansion Form of the Hamiltonian
The Hamiltonian description of ocean surface waves was introduced by Zakharov [8] as follows:
where is the horizontal coordinate, is the vertical displacement, is the velocity potential, is the velocity potential evaluated on the surface, z is the vertical coordinate directed upwards with its origin on the undisturbed surface , is the functional derivative of H with respect to , and H is the Hamiltonian (the total energy) expressed in and . Here, the Hamiltonian is the sum of the kinetic and potential energies divided by the fluid density. These are given by
where is the horizontal gradient operator, h is the constant depth of water, g is the acceleration due to gravity, and is the ratio of the surface tension coefficient to the fluid density. The velocity potential must satisfy the following equations:
The Fourier transforms of and are introduced by
where and are, respectively, the Fourier transforms of and , is the horizontal wave vector, and the asterisk denotes the complex conjugate, . In the following, the time variable t is omitted for simplicity. Please note that the Fourier transformation is the canonical one; then, the canonical Equations can be transformed into the canonical ones with the pair of canonically conjugate variables and as follows:
To normalize Equation (5), the canonical transformation is introduced by
where , and is the linear dispersion relation defined by
Equations (5) can be reduced to a single equation
using (6). Now, the Hamiltonian H is a functional of and . In this work, attention is paid to waves of small but finite amplitudes (weakly nonlinear waves). Assuming small wave slopes, we can formally expand the Hamiltonian into integral power series in powers of a and (see in Section 3). Here, we consider this expansion with accuracy up to and including the sixth-order terms as follows:
where stands for the Hamiltonian of j-wave interactions, and
where , and were given by Krasitskii [7], and will be given in Section 3. In the compact notation, the arguments in ,, , , and -functions are replaced by the subscript j, with the subscript zero assigned to . For example, , etc., and the integral signs denote corresponding multiple integrals with the limits from to .
It is important to assume that the coefficients , and satisfy the natural symmetry conditions, which ensure that the Hamiltonian coefficients do not change as the integral variable subscripts change. For example, the coefficient is symmetric under the transposition of the arguments 1 and 2, under all transpositions of , and 2, under the transpositions of , and 3, under the transpositions of the arguments inside the groups and , under the transpositions of all its indices, under all transpositions of , and 4, under the transpositions of the arguments inside the groups and , under all transpositions of , and 5, under the transpositions of the arguments inside the groups and , and so on. The coefficients should ensure the Hamiltonian is a real quantity. In view of this, there are additional symmetry conditions
It should be mentioned here that the coefficients calculated directly are asymmetric, so it is necessary to pay attention to skills in the calculation process (the definite integral has nothing to do with the form of the integral variable) to construct the symmetric coefficients (see Section 3).
By virtue of and , the following evolution equation is obtained:
where
To simplify the expression of the Hamiltonian, the canonical transformation was introduced [7]. Thus, we can obtain a new Hamiltonian that satisfies
where the canonical transformation satisfies Poisson’s brackets,
Here, on the right side of stands for the Dirac function.
According to previously established canonical transformation principles, the form of canonical transformation is postulated by
Supposing that and satisfy the natural symmetry conditions, their detailed expressions will be given in Section 4. Then, the new Hamiltonian can be obtained by substituting (16) into (7). In the process, the coefficients and are replaced, respectively, by , , and and satisfy symmetry conditions like the previous ones.
On the basis of the transformation, as mentioned above, and the resonance conditions, and choosing appropriate and , one can deduce the dynamical equation of ocean surface waves concerning three-four-five-six-wave resonance by eliminating the nonresonant terms at the right-hand side of Equation (12). The dynamical equation of ocean surface gravity waves that contain four-five-wave resonance interactions was obtained by Krasitskii [7]. In Section 4, the corresponding dynamical equation, which contains four-five-six-wave resonance interactions, will be obtained.
3. The Six-Order Expansion Coefficients of the Hamiltonian
In this section, the precise form of the expansion coefficients , and are obtained by complex calculations. The first three were given by Krasitskii [7]. Here, the expansion of H with accuracy up to the sixth-order terms for ocean surface capillary–gravity waves with a finite water depth is presented. The general solution of the Laplace equation satisfying the bottom boundary condition can be presented by the following Fourier integral:
3.1. Expending the Hamiltonian H in Powers of and with Accuracy up to the Sixth Order
Using the expression of the kinetic K(2a) and (17), it can be shown that
where
with .
Assuming is small (weak nonlinearity), and we can replace the hyperbolic sines in by their Taylor’s expansion up to the fourth order [ and ], which is sufficient for presenting the kinetic energy with accuracy up to the sixth-order terms. Thus, using (4), the expansion of the kinetic energy is presented by
where
where is given by (7).
The expansion of potential energy is trivial, and the result is
where
The compact notation is given by (7). We now have obtained the expansion of H in terms of and with accuracy up to the sixth-order terms.
3.2. Expressing through and with Accuracy up to the Fifth Order
From , we can obtain
The hyperbolic cosine in can be replaced by Taylor’s expansion up to the fourth order []. Using , Equation yields
This equation can be solved by the iterative method. The solution of , after proper symmetrization, is
where
Now, the relation of to and is obtained.
3.3. Presenting H through the Canonically Conjugate Variables and with Accuracy up to the Sixth Order
Substituting (26) into (20) and retaining therein the terms up to the sixth order leads to
where
with
Here, , standing for the first term in the curly braces of Equation (35), should be repeated, and the indices 0 and 1 interchanged, such that the right-hand side of Equation (35) should be symmetrized with respect to arguments . The detailed process of deriving , , and is given in Appendix A.
Please note that the coefficients and are identical to the classical ones given by Krasitskii [7].
Using and , we can obtain
Analogous to Krasitskii [7], the system of Equations (37) and (38) is more convenient for the numerical study of combined four-five-six-wave interactions than the dynamical Equation (47).
3.4. The Forms of Coefficients , , , and
Finally, combining Equations and , the forms of the coefficients , , and can be determined. The forms of , , and were given by Krasitskii [7]. After proper symmetrization, we obtain the following expressions concerning :
where
The coefficients satisfy all the necessary symmetry conditions.
4. The Dynamical Equation
In this section, we pay attention to ocean surface gravity waves. The dynamical equations that contain four-five-six-wave interactions and the forms of the coefficients concerning the canonical transformation , , , are presented. The methods of deducing the dynamical equations are as follows: (i) starting directly from the canonical transformation conditions (15) [41]; (ii) substituting the transformation (16) into (9) [7]; (iii) using the Hilbert transformation to transform the canonical variables [30]. In the following, method (ii) is adopted to calculate the coefficients of the canonical transformation and the dynamical equation. The forms of and were obtained by Krasitskii [7]. Considering the symmetrization of the coefficients, Janssen [42] gave a new calculation method concerning . The six-wave resonance conditions of ocean surface gravity waves are as follows [1]:
The following process is to determine the coefficients and , so that the new Hamiltonian is simplified when the coefficients are expressed in terms of b. This process implies removing nonresonant terms from the Hamiltonian. Thus, after a successful determination of the function in (16), the new Hamiltonian , which we wish to obtain, has the form
Given this form of Hamiltonian and Equation (14), the dynamical equation of the four-five-six-wave resonance for ocean surface gravity waves in water of a finite depth takes the following form:
The following describes how to obtain the kernel functions and the coefficients . We should substitute transformation (16) into (12) and substitute the derivatives arising from from Equation (47). After combining the like terms and proper symmetrization, we can obtain 18 algebraic equations concerning the coefficients, in which six equations of can be written as follows:
where . The detailed expression of function is given in Appendix B. The coefficients can be divided into two classes: nonresonant ones (,) and resonant ones (). The nonresonant coefficients can be obtained directly from Equations (48), (52) and (53):
We now turn to obtain the resonant coefficients () and the kernels of the six-wave dynamical equation().
First, by the symmetry properties, Equation (49) leads to
The general solution of Equation (57) is symmetric under transpositions within the groups (2,3,4,5) and can be expressed by , where the particular solution is symmetric under the transpositions within the groups (2,3,4,5), and the function is symmetric under the transpositions within the groups (0,1) and (2,3,4,5). It is worth pointing out that the choice of function is free. In the following, we choose , and the coefficient is a suitable particular solution of Equation , which is symmetric under the transpositions within the groups (2,3,4,5) and non-singular when . We construct a particular solution:
The solution (58) is formally singular for resonant condition ; however, it is possible to show that each term of function can factor out , which means that the solution (58) is non-singular when . This yields
Please note that the antisymmetry of under means
From (49) and (60), we obtain
This representation of the kernel already possesses all the necessary symmetry properties in explicit form.
Second, using (50), we turn to the determination of the canonical transformation coefficients as follows:
Analogous to the above, we construct a particular solution as follows:
The solution (63) is formally singular for resonant condition ; however, it is possible to show that each term of the function can factor out , which implies that the solution (63) is non-singular when . Substituting (63) into (50) gives
Finally, it remains to determine the coefficient . Combining Equations (49) and (51) leads to
Adding (65) to the equation arising from interchanging the indices 0 and 1 of each term in (65) yields
Please note that each term of the function can factor out ; then, the right side of (66) is non-singular. Equation (65) yields
To summarize, all the coefficients of the canonical transformation and the kernels of the dynamical equation are determined.
Obviously, Equation (47) conserves the energy. Now, we consider the integrals of motion . For , the quantity I is the wave momentum, and for , it is the wave action. From (47), we obtain
From (43)–(45) and (68), we can find that the dynamical equation for four-five-six-wave resonance (47) only conserves the momentum; however, the one for four-wave resonance conserves both the momentum and the action. It is worth noting that the wave action is not conservative when we only consider six-wave resonance.
5. The Kinetic Equation
This section focuses on deducing the kinetic equation for ocean surface gravity waves in water of a finite depth. First, some definitions are introduced. We define the observable wave number spectrum of a horizontally uniform random wave field by
where the angle brackets imply an ensemble average. By analogy with and , and are defined by
where and are the weak-interaction spectra.
The calculating of is usually performed using the following steps: (1) multiplying (47) by and multiplying the complex conjugate equation of (47) by ; (2) subtracting the latter from the former; (3) averaging and setting . We can obtain
where and are the correlators. In order to close Equation (71), we will apply the quasi-Gaussian approximation. Replacing the linear term in (47) with , we can construct the evolution equations of , and as follows:
where is the sum of the integrals containing the products of . The other expressions in brackets have a similar meaning. Next, the quasi-Gaussian approximation is introduced: (1) is assumed to be zero; (2) the 6-8-10-order correlators are expressed through the two-order correlators (Gaussian random process) as follows:
where
The -order correlator contains terms. In the cases of and , we can refer the reader to the respective work of Zakharov et al. [11] and Krasitskii [43]. With these assumptions, Equations (71)–(75) are closed.
Using formula and the correlators assumed to be changing slowly (we neglect the time derivative), substituting Equations (72)–(75) into (71), we can obtain the precise forms of , and . Thus, the Hamiltonian kinetic equation of four-five-six-wave resonance is
Equation (80) contains the kinetic equation of four-five-wave resonance given by Krasitskii [7]. In the approximation applied, each kinetic integral depends only on itself.
Finally, we consider the possibility of the existence of conservation laws of the form . For , J is the mean momentum of the random wave field, for , it is the mean potential energy, and for , it is the mean wave action. From Equation (80), we obtain
It is seen from this equation that (1) the Hamilton kinetic equation of four-five-six-wave resonance conserves the momentum and the energy, and (2) only the Hamilton kinetic equation of four-wave resonance conserves the wave action. The action evolution is governed by Equation (81):
6. Discussion and Conclusions
The wave turbulence theory of ocean surface gravity waves has been advanced from the classical four-five-wave resonance [7] to the four-five-six-wave ones in this work, i.e., the dynamical Equation (47) and its kinetic Equation (80), which are hard won and have another basic foothold at a deep level. This introduces a series of new changes and extensions to the basic solutions of the Kolmogorov–Zakharov spectra [11], instability [25,26,27], nonlinear Schrödinger equation [8,44], etc., and also provides a theoretical platform for an extension of the practical and extensive level for wave–current interactions [45,46], slowly varying depths [47,48], surface capillary–gravity waves [21,23], atmosphere–ocean coupling [49,50], etc.
If we look back at the wave turbulence theory in this work, we find that it has a serious theoretical defect, just like the classical wave turbulence theory [7,9]: it adopts the linear dispersion relation instead of the matching nonlinear dispersion relation [20,51]. This can only be addressed in the future.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, G.L. and H.H.; methodology, G.L. and H.H.; software, G.L. and H.H.; validation, G.L. and H.H.; formal analysis, G.L.; investigation, G.L.; resources, G.L. and H.H.; data curation, G.L. and H.H.; writing—original draft preparation, G.L.; writing—review and editing, G.L.; visualization, G.L.; supervision, H.H.; project administration, G.L. and H.H.; funding acquisition, G.L. and H.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 11772180).
Data Availability Statement
Data are contained within the article.
Acknowledgments
The author thanks referees for important and helpful suggestions that have contributed to improvements in the quality of the article.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Appendix A. Derivation of the Three Expressions for the Kinetic Energy in (31)
Let
In Section 3.3, we know that the terms , and are determined by substituting (26) into (20) and retaining therein the terms up to the sixth order. Here, the four-waves resonance coefficient is determined by the fourth-order terms of the first three terms of the right-hand side of Equation (20) after substitution; the five-waves resonance coefficient is determined by the fifth-order terms of first four terms of the right-hand side of Equation (20) after substitution; the six-waves resonance coefficient is determined by the sixth-order terms of the right-hand side of Equation (20) after substitution.
Appendix A.1. The Calculation of
The is composed of three components as follows:
(1) The first component is the fourth-order terms coefficient of substituting the (26) into . The process of calculation is shown below.
The points of calculation are as follows:
The first two terms on the right-hand side of (A3) are
The last term on the right-hand side of (A3) is
Similar calculations will be used several times below, but we will not go into details.
(2) The second component is the fourth-order terms coefficient of substituting the (26) into .
(3) The third component is the fourth-order terms coefficient of substituting the (26) into .
From the above, it follows that
By proper symmetrization, (A8) yields
Appendix A.2. The Calculation of
The is composed of four components as follows:
(1) The first component is the fifth-order terms coefficient of substituting the (26) into .
(2) The second component is the fifth-order terms coefficient of substituting the (26) into .
(3) The third component is the fifth-order terms coefficient of substituting the (26) into .
(4) The fourth component is the fifth-order terms coefficient of substituting the (26) into .
From the above, it follows that
By proper symmetrization, the terms on the right-hand side in (A14) can be expressed as the following four equations, respectively.
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
From (A15)–(A18), it follows that
Appendix A.3. The Calculation of
The is composed of five components as follows
(1) The first component is the sixth-order terms coefficient of substituting the (26) into .
(2) The second component is the sixth-order terms coefficient of substituting the (26) into .
(3) The third component is the sixth-order terms coefficient of substituting the (26) into .
(4) The fourth component is the sixth-order terms coefficient of substituting the (26) into .
(5) The fifth component is the sixth-order terms coefficient of substituting the (26) into .
From the above, it follows that
The main purpose of the following is to simplify the right-hand side of the above equation. After proper symmetric transformation, the right term of the (A25) can be expressed into the following nine simplified equations:
(1)
In this context, where standing for the terms in curly braces on the right-hand side of (A29) should be repeated, and the indices m and n interchanged. The similarities in the following text will not be specified.
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)
Substituting (A26)–(A34) into (A25), and combined with the resonance conditions, after the combination of similar terms we can have
Merging of the similar terms is the key to simplification (3.91). There are eight types of merging as follows:
(1) The terms similar to of (A29) are transformed to , and add to of (A31).
(2) The terms similar to of (A29) add to the terms of (A34).
(3) The terms similar to of (A29) add to the terms of (A33).
(4) The terms similar to of (A30) add to the terms of (A31).
(5) The terms similar to of (A33) add to the terms in (A34).
(6) The terms similar to of (A30) add to the terms of (A32).
(7) The terms similar to of (A29) add to the terms of (A31).
(8) The terms similar to of (A31) add to the terms ,, and .
Appendix B. Derivation of the Expression Forms of the Function (n = 1,2,3,4,5,6) in (48)–(53)
For simplicity, introducing a function implies that the stands for a function which is symmetric under transpositions within the group , and it contain terms. For example,
In the following, we present the forms of functions .
where
where
References
- Lin, G.B.; Huang, H. Proof of six-wave resonance conditions of ocean surface gravity waves in deep water. China Ocean Eng. 2019, 33, 734–738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Phillips, O.M. On the dynamics of unsteady gravity waves of finite amplitude Part 1. The elementary interactions. J. Fluid Mech. 1960, 9, 193–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Krasitskii, V.P.; Kozhelupova, N.G. On conditions for five-wave resonant interactions of surface gravity waves. Oceanlogy 1994, 34, 485–489. [Google Scholar]
- Mcgoldrick, L.F. Resonant interactions among capillary-gravity waves. J. Fluid Mech. 1965, 21, 305–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hammack, J.L.; Henderson, D.M. Resonant interactions among surface water waves. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 1993, 25, 55–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Az-Zo’bi, E.A.; AlZoubi, W.A.; Akinyemi, L.; Şenol, M.; Alsaraireh, I.W.; Mamat, M. Abundant closed-form solitons for time-fractional integro–differential equation in fluid dynamics. Opt. Quant. Electron. 2021, 53, 132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Krasitskii, V.P. On reduced equations in the Hamiltonian theory of weakly nonlinear surface waves. J. Fluid Mech. 1994, 272, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zakharov, V.E. Stability of periodic waves of finite amplitude on the surface of a deep fluid. J. Appl. Mech. Tech. Phys. 1968, 9, 190–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hasselmann, K. On the non-linear energy transfer in a gravity-wave spectrum Part 1. General theory. J. Fluid Mech. 1962, 12, 481–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dyachenko, A.I.; Lvov, Y.V. On the Hasselmann and Zakharov Approaches to the Kinetic Equations for Gravity Waves. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 1995, 25, 3237–3238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zakharov, V.E.; L’vov, V.S.; Falkovich, G. Kolmogorov Spectra of Turbulence I: Wave Turbulence; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1992. [Google Scholar]
- Nazarenko, S. Wave Turbulence; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2011. [Google Scholar]
- Newell, A.C.; Rumpf, B. Wave turbulence. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 2011, 43, 59–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nazarenko, S.; Lukaschuk, S. Wave turbulence on water surface. Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 2016, 7, 61–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cazaubiel, A.; Mawet, S.; Darras, A.; Grosjean, G.; Loon, J.J.W.A.V.; Dorbolo, S.; Falcon, E. Wave turbulence on the surface of a fluid in a high-gravity environment. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2019, 123, 244501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chibbaro, S.; Dematteis, G.; Rondoni, L. 4-wave dynamics in kinetic wave turbulence. Phys. D 2018, 362, 24–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Düring, G.; Josserand, C.; Rica, S. Wave turbulence theory of elastic plates. Phys. D 2017, 347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stokes, G.G. On the theory of oscillatory waves. Trans. Camb. Philos. Soc. 1847, 8, 441–455. [Google Scholar]
- Mei, C.C.; Stiassnime, M.; Yue, D.K.P. Theory and Applications of Ocean Surface Waves; World Scientific: Singapore, 2005. [Google Scholar]
- Stuhlmeier, R.; Stiassnie, M. Nonlinear dispersion for ocean surface waves. J. Fluid Mech. 2019, 859, 49–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zakharov, V.E.; Filonenko, N.N. Weak turbulence of capillary waves. J. Appl. Mech. Tech. Phys. 1967, 8, 37–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Janssen, P.A.E.M. The Interaction of Ocean Waves and Wind; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2004. [Google Scholar]
- Pan, Y.; Yue, D.K.P. Understanding discrete capillary-wave turbulence using a quasi-resonant kinetic equation. J. Fluid Mech. 2017, 816, R1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alfimov, G.L.; Medvedeva, E.V.; Pelinovsky, D.E. Wave systems with an infinite number of localized traveling waves. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2014, 112, 054103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McLean, J.W.; Ma, Y.C.; Martin, D.U.; Saffman, P.G.; Yuen, H.C. Three-Dimensional Instability of Finite-Amplitude Water Waves. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1981, 46, 817–820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McLean, J.W. Instabilities of finite-amplitude gravity waves on water of finite depth. J. Fluid Mech. 1982, 114, 331–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shrira, V.I.; Badulin, S.I.; Kharif, C. A model of water wave ’horse-shoe’ patterns. J. Fluid Mech. 1996, 318, 375–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Glozman, M.; Agnon, Y.; Stiassnie, M. High-order formulation of the water-wave problem. Phys. D 1993, 66, 347–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Craig, W.; Worfolk, P. An integrable normal form for water waves in infinite depth. Phys. D 1995, 84, 513–531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dyachenko, A.I.; Lvov, Y.V.; Zakharov, V.E. Five-wave interaction on the surface of deep fluid. Phys. D 1995, 87, 233–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lvov, Y.V. Effective five-wave Hamiltonian for surface water waves. Phys. Lett. A 1997, 230, 38–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dyachenko, A.I.; Kachulin, D.I.; Zakharov, V.E. On the nonintegrability of the free surface hydrodynamics. JETP Lett. 2013, 98, 43–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bortolozzo, U.; Laurie, J.; Nazarenko, S.; Residori, S. Optical wave turbulence and the condensation of light. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 2009, 26, 2280–2284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Laurie, J.; L’vov, V.S.; Nazarenko, S.; Rudenko, O. Interaction of Kelvin waves and non-locality of the energy transfer in superfluids. Phys. Rev. B 2010, 81, 104526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stiassnie, M.; Shemer, L. On modifications of the Zakharov equation for surface gravity waves. J. Fluid Mech. 1984, 143, 47–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Az-Zo’bi, E.A. Solitary and periodic exact solutions of the viscosity-capillarity van der Waals gas equations. Appl. Appl. Math. 2019, 14, 23. [Google Scholar]
- Akram, G.; Sadaf, M.; Khan, M.A.U. Soliton dynamics of the generalized shallow water like equation in nonlinear phenomenon. Front. Phys. 2022, 10, 822042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arshed, S.; Akram, G.; Sadaf, M.; Bilal Riaz, M.; Wojciechowski, A. Solitary wave behavior of (2+1)-dimensional Chaffee-Infante equation. PLoS ONE 2023, 18, e0276961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Akram, G.; Arshed, S.; Sadaf, M.; Mariyam, H.; Aslam, M.N.; Ahmad, R.; Khan, I.; Alzahrani, J. Abundant solitary wave solutions of Gardner’s equation using three effective integration techniques. AIMS Math. 2023, 8, 8171–8184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dey, P.; Sadek, L.H.; Tharwat, M.M.; Sarker, S.; Karim, R.; Akbar, M.A.; Elazab, N.S.; Osman, M.S. Soliton solutions to generalized (3+1)-dimensional shallow water-like equation using the (ϕ′/ϕ,1/ϕ)-expansion method. Arab J. Basic Appl. Sci. 2024, 31, 121–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Krasitskii, V.P. On the canonical transformation of the theory of weakly nonlinear waves with nondecay dispersion law. Sov. Phys. JETP 1990, 98, 1644–1655. [Google Scholar]
- Janssen, P.A.E.M. On some consequences of the canonical transformation in the Hamiltonian theory of water waves. J. Fluid Mech. 2009, 637, 1–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Krasitskii, V.P. Five-wave kinetic equation for surface gravity waves. Phys. Oceanogr. 1994, 5, 413–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gramstad, O.; Trulsen, K. Hamiltonian form of the modified nonlinear Schrödinger equation for gravity waves on arbitrary depth. J. Fluid Mech. 2011, 670, 404–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Peregrine, D.H. Interaction of Water Waves and Currents. Adv. Appl. Mech. 1976, 16, 9–117. [Google Scholar]
- Gramstad, O. The Zakharov equation with separate mean flow and mean surface. J. Fluid Mech. 2014, 740, 254–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dingemans, M. Water Wave Propagation over Uneven Bottoms; World Scientific: Singapore, 1997. [Google Scholar]
- Porter, D. The mild-slope equations: A unified theory. J. Fluid Mech. 2020, 887, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cavaleri, L.; Barbariol, F.; Benetazzo, A.; Waseda, T. Ocean wave physics and modeling. Bull. Am. Met. Soc. 2019, 100, ES297–ES300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pedlosky, J. Waves in the Ocean and Atmosphere-Introduction to Wave Dynamics; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2003. [Google Scholar]
- Stiassnie, M. On the strength of the weakly nonlinear theory for surface gravity waves. J. Fluid Mech. 2017, 810, 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).