Next Article in Journal
Semi-Adaptive Evolution with Spontaneous Modularity of Half-Chaotic Randomly Growing Autonomous and Open Networks
Next Article in Special Issue
Experimental Review of ΛΛ¯ Production
Previous Article in Journal
A 3D Agent-Based Model of Lung Fibrosis
Previous Article in Special Issue
Electromagnetic Form Factors of Σ Hyperons
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Time-like Proton Form Factors with Initial State Radiation Technique

1
Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanchang Rd. 509, Lanzhou 730000, China
2
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
3
Helmholtz Institute Mainz, Staudinger Weg 18, D-55099 Mainz, Germany
4
GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung GmbH, 64291 Darmstadt, Germany
5
Institute of Nuclear Physics, Johannes Gutenberg University, D-55099 Mainz, Germany
6
PRISMA + Cluster of Excellence, Johannes Gutenberg University, D-55099 Mainz, Germany
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Symmetry 2022, 14(1), 91; https://doi.org/10.3390/sym14010091
Submission received: 29 November 2021 / Revised: 20 December 2021 / Accepted: 1 January 2022 / Published: 6 January 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Baryon Structure: Form Factors and Polarization)

Abstract

:
Electromagnetic form factors are fundamental quantities describing the internal structure of hadrons. They can be measured with scattering processes in the space-like region and annihilation processes in the time-like region. The two regions are connected by crossing symmetry. The measurements of the proton electromagnetic form factors in the time-like region using the initial state radiation technique are reviewed. Recent experimental studies have shown that initial state radiation processes at high luminosity electron-positron colliders can be effectively used to probe the electromagnetic structure of hadrons. The BABAR experiment at the B-factory PEP-II in Stanford and the BESIII experiment at BEPCII (an electron positron collider in the τ -charm mass region) in Beijing have measured the time-like form factors of the proton using the initial state radiation process e + e p p ¯ γ . The two kinematical regions where the photon is emitted from the initial state at small and large polar angles have been investigated. In the first case, the photon is in the region not covered by the detector acceptance and is not detected. The Born cross section and the proton effective form factor have been measured over a wide and continuous range of the the momentum transfer squared q 2 from the threshold up to 42 (GeV/c) 2 . The ratio of electric and magnetic form factors of the proton has been also determined. In this report, the theoretical aspect and the experimental studies of the initial state radiation process e + e p p ¯ γ are described. The measurements of the Born cross section and the proton form factors obtained in these analyses near the threshold region and in the relatively large q 2 region are examined. The experimental results are compared to the predictions from theory and models. Their impact on our understanding of the nucleon structure is discussed.

1. Introduction

The concept of symmetry plays a key role in the understanding of the fundamental building blocks of the universe and the forces binding them. Experiments employing antimatter, a mirror or a counterpart of a subatomic particle with opposite charge and right- or left-handed spin, provide important information about the elementary units of which the universe is composed. Measurements of the exclusive production of a hadron pair in electron positron annihilation, for example, are of great interest for understanding the internal structure of hadrons. Assuming the exchange of a virtual photon of positive momentum transfer squared, q 2 , between the initial and the final states, these processes contain direct information about the electromagnetic form factors (EMFFs) in the time-like region. The number of independent EMFFs is determined by the spin of the hadron taking into account symmetry properties of the electromagnetic interaction under the Charge, Parity, and Time (CPT) transformations. Spin 1/2 baryons are characterized by the electric form factor G E ( q 2 ) and magnetic form factor G M ( q 2 ) . In the space-like region ( q 2 < 0 ), EMFFs can be accessed experimentally for stable bayrons through the elastic scattering experiments between electron and baryons. The crossed symmetry channels e + e B B ¯ allow us to access the time-like region. Crossing symmetry, which holds at the tree level, states that the same amplitude describes the crossed processes, which occur in different kinematical regions, and connect the time-like with the space-like EMFFs. Space-like EMFFs provide information about the distributions of the charge and magnetic current densities. At low momentum transfer squared, they probe the size of the proton where the proton charge radius can be deduced from the derivative of | G E | at q 2 = 0 (GeV/c) 2 . Time-like EMFFs have a less intuitive interpretation compared to the space-like region but their measurement is crucial to understand the long-range behavior of the strong interactions, to constrain the models and to test the theoretical predictions [1,2,3]. They can be used to study the transition amplitudes of physical processes, like the electromagnetic decays of vector mesons, and to investigate the discrete hadron spectrum. In Ref. [4], they have been associated with the time evolution of charge and magnetic current densities.
Time-like EMFFs have been measured in e + e annihilation experiments by using the energy scan method, where the center of mass (c.m.) energy ( s ) of the e + e beams is varied, and a measurement on the cross section is performed at each c.m. energy point through the e + e direct annihilation process. This method, however, cannot be used at e + e colliders that are designed to operate at fixed c.m. energies such as the B-factories PEP-II at SLAC and KEK-B in Tsukuba with a s corresponding to the mass of the Υ ( 4 S ) -resonance. A complementary approach to the energy scan technique that allows the measurements of the hadronic final states with invariant masses below the c.m. energy of the collider is provided by the initial state radiation (ISR) method. The ISR method, also called the radiative return technique, employs measurements of the process e + e h a d r o n s + n γ where the emission of one or more high energy photons reduces the mass squared of the hadronic system to below s .
The theoretical studies of the ISR processes started a long time ago in the 1960s. The importance of the ISR approach has been outlined in the calculation of the photon emission for muon pair production in Ref. [5] and for pions in Ref. [6]. The possibility of using this approach at the high luminosity e + e colliders has been later discussed [7,8,9,10], in particular when the first generation of Φ and B factories came into operation in the late 1990s. It has been realized that the suppression factor α / π , where α is the fine electromagnetic constant, due to the photon emission, can be well compensated for by the high luminosities collected at the e + e facilities, providing precise measurements of hadronic final states over a wide c.m. energy range. In addition, this method provides great control of systematic effects since only one experimental setup is involved in this wide range coverage.
The ISR approach became a powerful tool for the analysis of experiments after the development of dedicated Monte Carlo event generators for the ISR processes, including higher order QED corrections, such as the PHOKHARA event generator [11,12] and the AFKQED package (based on an early version of PHOKHARA called EVA [9,13]). The theoretical accuracy and the flexibility provided by these event generators have allowed experiments such as BABAR, Belle, KLOE and BESIII to simulate a large number of hadronic reactions and perform precise measurements of the corresponding cross sections.
In the time-like region, measurements of baryon EMFFs using the ISR technique have been provided by BABAR, Belle and BESIII experiments. The BABAR experiment at PEP-II [14] has measured the time-like EMFFs of the proton with the ISR process e + e p p ¯ γ [15,16,17] using datasets of integrated luminosity up to 469 fb 1 . The two kinematical regions, where the photon is emitted from the initial state at small and large polar angles, have been investigated. In the first case—the small angle ISR (SA-ISR, also called ISR-Untagged)—the photon is in the region not covered by the detector acceptance and is not detected, while in the second case for the large angle ISR (LA-ISR, also called ISR-Tagged), the photon has to be detected and all the particles in the final state are fully reconstructed. The Born cross section (Equation (2)) and the proton effective form factor (Equation (3)) have been measured over a wide and continuous range of the the momentum transfer squared q 2 from the threshold up to 42 (GeV/c) 2 , considering both analyses. The ratio of electric and magnetic form factors of the proton has also been determined in the LA-ISR analysis. The hyperon final states Λ Λ ¯ γ , Λ Σ ¯ 0 γ , Σ Σ ¯ 0 γ have also been investigated by BABAR [18]. The | G E | / | G m | ratio for the Λ hyperon has been measured in two mass intervals between 2.23 and 2.80 GeV/c 2 . The Belle collaboration at KEK-B used the ISR-technique in the charmonium energy region and measured the process e + e Λ c + Λ c [19]. The BESIII experiment in Beijing provided the world’s largest samples of e + e collisions in the τ -charm mass region. Large data samples have been accumulated at c.m. energies corresponding to the charmonium and X , Y and Z states. At s = 3.773 GeV, an integrated luminosity of 2.9 fb 1 has been accumulated and used for most of the ISR analyses. Using these data samples, precise measurements of the proton EMFFs have been performed with the ISR method [20,21]. Both LA- and SA-ISR approaches have been studied at BESIII. In these analyses, the emission of a hard ISR photon in the signal channel is required. Therefore, the proton EMFFs have been studied in p p ¯ mass intervals sufficiently smaller than the c.m. energies of the used data samples ( s 3.773 GeV).
Important results with the ISR technique have also been obtained for mesonic final states. Precise measurements, for example, on the cross section for the processes e + e π + π and e + e K + K have been provided by KLEO, BABAR, and BESIII experiments [22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29]. These measurements cover a wide mass range and have a large impact on the calculation of the hadronic contribution to the anomalous magnetic moment of the muon.
In this report, we describe the ISR analyses for the proton EMFFs measurements at BABAR and BESIII experiments. In Section 2, the theoretical calculations of the differential and integrated cross section for the process e + e p p ¯ γ are described. The experimental results of the proton EMFFs measurements from both experiments are reviewed in Section 3, followed by a discussion in Section 4. Two reports about the nucleon EMFFs through the scan technique are also published in this Special Issue, and the details may be found in Refs. [30,31].

2. Theoretical Description for the Process of e + e p p ¯ γ

2.1. Born Cross Section for e + e p p ¯ Process

Under the assumption of one virtual photon exchange (Figure 1), the differential cross section for the annihilation process of e + e p p ¯ in the e + e c.m. frame reads as [32]:
d σ p p ¯ ( q 2 ) d cos ϑ p = π α 2 β C 2 q 2 | G M ( q 2 ) | 2 1 + cos 2 ϑ p + | G E ( q 2 ) | 2 τ sin 2 ϑ p ,
where q 2 is equal to the square of the p p ¯ invariant mass M p p ¯ , α 1 137 is the fine structure constant, ϑ p is the polar angle of the proton in the e + e c.m. frame, and the velocity of the proton, β , equals to 1 1 / τ with τ = q 2 / 4 m p 2 (proton mass m p ). The Coulomb factor C = y 1 e y ( y = π α β ), which accounts for the electromagnetic interaction between the outgoing proton and antiproton in the final state [16,33]. The moduli of the individual magnetic and electric FFs can be determined through analyzing the proton angular distribution. The total cross section for the process of e + e p p ¯ can be obtained by integrating the differential cross section (Equation (1)),
σ p p ¯ ( q 2 ) = 4 π α 2 β C 3 q 2 | G M | 2 + | G E | 2 2 τ .
An effective form factor can be introduced as a combination of | G M | 2 and | G E | 2 ,
| G eff | = 2 τ | G M | 2 + | G E | 2 2 τ + 1 ,

2.2. Cross Section for the e + e p p ¯ γ Process

The cross section for the lowest order ISR process shown in Figure 2, that is, including only one photon emission from the initial state and integrating over the proton momenta and the azimuthal angle ( ϕ γ * ) of the ISR photon, can be written as [9,15,34]:
d σ p p ¯ γ ( q 2 ) d q 2 d cos θ γ * = 1 s W ( s , x , θ γ * ) σ p p ¯ ( q 2 ) , x = 2 E γ * s = 1 q 2 s ,
where E γ * and θ γ * are the energy and the polar angle of the ISR photon, respectively, in the e + e c.m. frame. The radiator function W ( s , x , θ γ * ) which describes the probability of ISR photon emission, is written as follows [6,34,35]:
W ( s , x , θ γ * ) = α π x 1 x + x 2 / 2 sin 2 θ γ * x 2 / 2 sin 4 θ γ * sin 2 θ γ * + 4 m e 2 / s cos 2 θ γ * 2 4 m e 2 s 1 2 x sin 2 θ γ * x 2 cos 4 θ γ * sin 2 θ γ * + 4 m e 2 / s cos 2 θ γ * 2 ,
where m e is the electron mass. The integration of W ( s , x , θ γ * ) over the ISR photon angle is given for two practical cases [34,35]. The first one is given for a range of integration θ γ 0 < θ γ * < ( π θ γ 0 ) and θ γ 0 m e / s ,
W ( s , x ) = α π x 2 2 x + x 2 ln 1 + cos θ γ 0 1 cos θ γ 0 x 2 cos θ γ 0 .
For the full range of the ISR polar angle ( θ γ 0 = 0 ),
W ( s , x ) = α π x ln s m e 2 1 2 2 x + x 2 .
The measurement of the proton EMFFs | G E | , | G M | and their ratio ( R em = | G E | / | G M | ) using the process e + e p p ¯ γ can be performed by studying the angular distribution of the proton. BABAR and BESIII experiments measured the ratio R em by analyzing the cos θ p distributions, where θ p is the angle between the proton in the p p ¯ rest system and the momentum of the p p ¯ system in the e + e c.m. frame.

2.3. Radiative Corrections on the e + e p p ¯ γ Process

The emission of extra photons from the charged particles involved in the reaction e + e p p ¯ γ requires precise calculation of the differential cross section at higher orders in the expansion of the fine structure constant α . Radiative corrections are usually incorporated in event generators and applied to the experimental analyses, taking into account the conditions of these experiments. This procedure allows for the convolution between the radiative corrections and the corrections of other experimental factors like, for example, the detection efficiency and the acceptance.
In the simulations of the e + e p p ¯ γ process at large photon emission angle, the BABAR collaboration has considered the additional photon radiation from the initial state using the structure function method [36,37]. This correction takes into account soft multi-photon emission and α 2 terms in the leading logarithmic calculations.
The BESIII collaboration used the radiative correction calculations provided by the PHOKHARA event generator [38,39]. The full next-to-leading (NLO) order QED corrections to ISR in the process e + + e γ + h a d r o n s , where γ is emitted at a non vanishing angle relative to the electron or positron beams, is considered in Ref. [12]. This includes virtual and soft photon corrections to the process e + + e γ + h a d r o n s and the emission of two real hard photons e + + e γ + γ + h a d r o n s . These calculations have been extended in Refs. [40,41] to the collinear region where the photons can be emitted at large and small angles relative to the electron or positron beams. The contribution of the leptonic and hadronic vacuum polarization in the virtual photon line has also been taken into account [42].
In the ISR measurements of the proton EMFFS, an evaluation of the background process e + e p p ¯ γ , where the photon is emitted from the final state proton/antiproton, need to be considered. Some techniques to separate the contributions from initial and final state photon emission have been discussed in Ref. [9]; in particular, the selection of events with photons emitted at small angles with respect to the beams axis. These events are dominated by ISR (Equation (5)). The FSR is therefore expected to have an important influence on the LA-ISR analyses. The issue of the FSR for the particular process e + e p p ¯ γ is considered in Ref. [43]. The leading order contributions of soft and hard real photon emissions have also been studied by taking into account the proton structure. The corrections from the FSR have been estimated for the BABAR kinematical conditions to be below 1 % . For the BESIII conditions, these corrections are found to be sizeable in the soft photon region (small x∼0.2). The BESIII LA-ISR analysis is restricted to x > 0.4 where the corrections are estimated to be at the level of 1% [43]. The BABAR collaboration has estimated independently the ratio of the FSR to ISR cross section to be about 10 3 [15]. The FSR corrections have been neglected by BaBar. The BESIII analyses use the leading order calculations of the FSR implemented in the PHOKHARA event generator [39]. For the real photon emission, the proton is assumed to be a point-like charged particle. The virtual corrections are considered with a multiplicative factor which converges to the Coulomb factor at small proton velocities. They are at the level of 1% in the kinematical conditions of the BESIII experiment. This one percent is taken conservatively as systematic uncertainty for the model used in these calculations. The interference between ISR and FSR is not considered in these analyses. Larger contributions from FSR in the real data compared to the Monte Carlo predictions can be seen in the behaviors of the proton and photon angular distributions.

3. Experimental Results of Proton form Factors from ISR Process

The proton EMFFs have been measured through the ISR technique at BABAR and BESIII experiments, with both SA- and LA-ISR photon kinematic ranges.

3.1. ISR Process e + e p p ¯ γ at BABAR and BESIII Experiments

The BABAR experiment started to take physics data in October 1999 and completed data taking in April 2008. Analyses through the ISR process were performed for the full data (BABAR experiment has performed the LA-ISR analysis with half of luminosity, 232 fb 1 , in 2006 [15]. In this report, the results from BABAR LA-ISR analysis with the full data sets [16] are reviewed) with an integrated luminosity of 469 fb 1 , which were collected at a c.m. energy of 10.58 GeV ( Υ ( 4 S ) ) and 10.54 GeV for about 90% and 10%, respectively [16,17]. Depending on whether the ISR photon is detected within the detection volume or escapes through the beam pipes, the analyses are referred to as LA-ISR or SA-ISR, respectively. The event selection for both types of analyses requires that two charged tracks originating from the interaction region are detected and identified as a proton or antiproton. For the LA-ISR analysis, additional photons have to be reconstructed in the events and a four-momentum kinematic fit is applied for the proton, antiproton and most-energetic photon. For the SA-ISR analysis, a requirement on p p ¯ transverse momentum is applied to remove the LA-ISR events and to suppress the background events. Figure 3 shows the p p ¯ invariant mass distribution from the LA-ISR and SA-ISR analyses.
Two ISR analyses (SA-ISR and LA-ISR) were performed at the BESIII experiment for the proton EMFFs measurements by using datasets collected at seven c.m. energies between 3.773 and 4.600 GeV with a total integrated luminosity of 7.5 fb 1 [20,21]. Similar to the BABAR experiment, both analyses required that two charged tracks, generated from the interaction region, are identified as a proton and an antiproton. For the LA-ISR analysis, an additional most-energetic photon is included together with the proton and antiproton for a four-momentum kinematic fit to suppress the background. The dominant background is from the e + e p p ¯ π 0 process with one photon from the π 0 decay misidentified as the ISR photon. For the SA-ISR analysis, the ISR photon escapes through the beam pipes and consequently, requirements on the missing momentum and missing mass squared of the proton and antiproton system are used to further suppress background such as two-photon, p p ¯ π 0 and higher order ISR processes. Figure 4 shows the p p ¯ invariant mass spectra from BESIII LA-ISR (a) and SA-ISR (b) analyses.
The Born cross section of e + e p p ¯ , the proton effective form factor and the ratio of the proton EMFFs were measured at different p p ¯ invariant mass regions for the LA- and SA-ISR analyses from both BABAR and BESIII experiments. Despite the large difference in the total luminosities collected by the two experiments, the numbers of the selected events are comparable due to the lower c.m. energies of BESIII compared to BABAR experiment. Table 1 summarizes the information of the four analyses.

3.2. Born Cross Section of e + e p p ¯ and Proton Effective FF

The Born cross section of e + e p p ¯ is calculated in small p p ¯ invariant mass intervals,
σ p p ¯ i ( m p p ¯ ) = N p p ¯ i ϵ i 1 + δ i L i ,
where the superscript i represents the i t h p p ¯ mass interval, N p p ¯ i is the number of p p ¯ events, ϵ i and ( 1 + δ i ) are the detection efficiency and the radiative correction factor determined by the MC simulation, and L i is the ISR differential luminosity calculated as:
L i = W ( s , x ) L d x , x = 1 q 2 s ,
where q 2 is the four momentum transfer squared for the i t h p p ¯ mass interval. In BABAR LA-ISR analysis, the process of e + e p p ¯ γ is simulated to extract the selection efficiency and radiative correction factor at the range: 20 < θ γ * < 160 in the e + e c.m. frame, therefore a reduced phase-space factor cos θ γ 0 with θ γ 0 = 20 was included to calculate the differential luminosity by using the Equation (6) [15,16]. In both analyses from the BESIII experiment, the full radiative function W ( s , x ) (Equation (7)) was used for the differential luminosity calculation, since the process was simulated in a full phase space [20,21]. The analyses from BESIII experiment contain data sets from seven c.m. energies with different integrated luminosity, the differential luminosity was calculated from each data set and summed up together. To determine the MC efficiency and the radiative correction factor, their mean value was calculated from all the MC simulations from seven c.m. energies.
The effective form factor of the proton is extracted from the e + e p p ¯ cross section measurements for both LA- and SA-ISR analyses at BABAR and BESIII experiments according to Equations (2) and (3). Figure 5 shows the results for the e + e p p ¯ cross section (Figure 5a) and the proton effective FF (Figure 5b) from all the analyses with the ISR process at BABAR and BESIII experiments, together with other available experimental data from the direct annihilation process.

3.3. The Ratio of the Proton FFs from the ISR Process

Taking advantage of the strong boost of the ISR photon, a full angular distribution of the proton can be obtained from the e + e p p ¯ γ process. This is in contrast to most analyses using the direct annihilation process, which has to limit the angular range due to detector acceptance. Therefore, the ISR method allows the extraction of the ratio of the proton FFs ( R em ) with a relatively higher precision compared to that of direct annihilation measurements with comparable statistics. Both LA-ISR analyses from BABAR and BESIII measured the ratio of the proton FFs at the p p ¯ invariant mass region of threshold −3.0 GeV/c 2 for six mass intervals, while the BESIII SA-ISR analysis measured the ratio between 2.0–3.0 GeV/c 2 for three mass intervals with reduced proton angular distributions. Figure 6 shows examples of proton angular distributions including a fit to extract the ratio of the proton FFs [16,20,21].
The results of the extracted ratio of the proton FFs from the three measurements are shown in Figure 7, including measurements from direct annihilation processes. Compared to the Born cross section measurements, the uncertainty both in terms of R em (y axis) and q 2 (x axis) is still very large due to limited statistics. The results of the proton FFs ratio are consistent for measurements (direct annihilation and ISR processes) from the e + e collider experiments. At the region close to the p p ¯ threshold ( q 2 < 4.2 (GeV/c) 2 ), recent results of the ratio obtained with ISR process at BABAR and BESIII, as well as by the most precise measurement with the direct annihilation process at BESIII, disfavor of the early measurement from the PS170 experiment with the p p ¯ e + e annihilation process. In addition, the branching fractions of the J / ψ and ψ to p p ¯ decays have also been measured in these ISR analyses by BABAR and BESIII. The results are in good agreement with the world average values from PDG [44] and provide an experimental check on the validity of the ISR approach and radiative correction estimations used in these analyses.

4. Discussion and Conclusions

4.1. Phenomenology Studies on the Proton EMFFs

The QCD calculation of the nucleon EMFFs in the few GeV momentum transfer regions, where non-perturbative methods are required, is complicated. Different parametrizations of the proton EMFFs have been developed to describe the data in the space-like region but only some of them can be extended to the time-like region (for review see Refs. [1,2]), such as the parametrizations based on dispersion relations [49] and vector meson dominance [50,51]. Models that allow for a unified description of space-like and time-like regions have also been exploited, for example, the relativistic constituent quark model within the light-front framework [52] and the Skyrme model using dispersion relations [53]. This region has recently attracted a lot of attention, in particular after the precise ISR measurements from BABAR were available. The BABAR data on the e + e p p ¯ Born cross section and on the effective EMFF show evidence of some structures (Figure 5). These structures have been later confirmed by the three independent analyses from the BESIII collaboration based on ISR and energy scan techniques. Theoretical studies have attempted to reproduce these structures and to provide an explanation of their origin. In Ref. [52], these structures have been referred to possible missing vector mesons that have not been considered in the calculations. In 2014, an improved parametrization of the nucleon EMFFs based on generalized vector dominance has been developed and implemented in the PHOKHARA event generator [39]. It describes well the measurements from BABAR, as well as the space-like data on the proton form factor ratio using polarized beam and/or target. In 2015, Lorenz et al. analyzed the EMFFs ratio and the effective FF of the proton from both TL and SL regions, and discussed possible contributions to the nucleon FFs from the vector meson ϕ ( 2170 ) or from final-state interaction (FSI) at the N Δ ¯ + c . c and Δ Δ ¯ thresholds [54]. A recent phenomenology study, by Cao and Dai, has a joint discussion of the effective FF of proton and neutron, where the periodic structures could be explained by the contributions from pure isoscalar or isovector, or their orthogonal interference [55].
In 2015, Bianconi and Tomasi-Gustafsson studied the proton effective FF from BABAR LA-ISR measurement, and found the data can be best reproduced by a three-pole function ( F 3 p ( s ) ) with an additional periodic oscillation part ( F o s c [ p ( s ) ] ) [56,57]. By including more experimental data from BESIII (direct annihilation and SA-ISR analyses) and CMD-3 experiments, this research was updated in 2021 [48].
| F p f i t ( q 2 ) | = F 3 p ( q 2 ) + F o s c p ( q 2 ) ,
F 3 p ( q 2 ) = F 0 1 + q 2 / m a 2 1 q 2 / m 0 2 2 ,
F o s c [ p ( q 2 ) ] = A e B p c o s C p + D ,
where p ( q 2 ) = q 2 ( τ 1 ) is the relative momentum of the proton in the frame where the antiproton is at rest, the standard dipole parameter m 0 2 = 0.71 (GeV/c) 2 , and other parameters are extracted by fitting to the experimental data, the values can be found in the reference [48]. Figure 8 shows the periodic oscillation structure of the proton effective FF described by Equation (12), in which the values of parameters are taken from Ref. [56].
Similar to the effective FF of the proton, a fit was performed in Ref. [48] on the ratio of the proton EMFFs with the function including a monopole decrease and a damped oscillation,
R em = 1 1 + q 2 m p 2 / r 0 1 + r 1 e r 2 ( q 2 m p ) sin r 3 ( q 2 m p ) .
As shown in Figure 7, the fit (dotted line), performed in Ref. [48], was only applied to the results from BABAR LA-ISA and BESIII energy scan (2020) measurements. By including more experimental results from both BESIII ISR measurements, a new fit (dot-dashed line in Figure 7) is performed in this report, in which the result is slightly changed with an improved fitting quality. The grey shadow represents a one standard deviation band.

4.2. Discussion of the Proton EMFFs from the ISR Process

The ISR Process has advantages to investigate the proton EMFFs at the e + e collider experiments.
So far, it is the only method used to extract the ratio of proton EMFFs at the p p ¯ threshold. Because of the very low momentum of the produced proton/anti-proton at the threshold from the direct annihilation process, it is not possible to reconstruct the charged tracks in a tracking system of the detector. The CMD-3 experiment has measured the cross section of e + e p p ¯ at the invariant mass very close to the threshold (1.89 and 1.90 GeV/c 2 ) by counting the annihilation of the antiproton in the beam pipe or in the drift chamber (tracking sub-detector) [47]. The ratio or the individual FF could not be extracted at these invariant mass regions because the angular distribution analysis is impossible without the proton/antiproton charged track reconstruction. With the strong boost of an ISR photon, the proton and antiproton are produced at their threshold with large momenta; therefore, full information of the momentum and PID can be obtained for the charged tracks of the p p ¯ system, thus it is possible to extract the ratio of the proton EMFFs (or individual FFs) by analyzing the angular distribution of the proton at the p p ¯ threshold region.
A full angular distribution of the proton improves the precision of the ratio of the proton FFs. It is not possible to have a full angular distribution of the proton from the direct annihilation process due to the non-4 π acceptance of a detector. As another benefit of the boost of the ISR photon, a full angular distribution of the proton (Figure 6) is obtained in the p p ¯ c.m. frame, and the ratio is extracted with higher precision by fitting to the full angular distribution. Table 2 lists a simple comparison for the precision of the proton FFs ratio, which were measured by the LA-ISR analyses from BABAR and BESIII, the SA-ISR analysis from BESIII, and the direct annihilation analyses from BESIII and CMD-3 experiments. The impact of the full angular distribution can be seen by comparing the statistical uncertainty on the proton FFs ratio to the corresponding one of the total number of observed events.
In addition, the ISR method provides continuous measurements of the proton EMFFs in a large p p ¯ invariant mass range. The combined BABAR and BESIII ISR measurements of the Born cross section and the proton effective FF cover the range from the threshold up to 6.5 GeV/c 2 , while the existing data from scan experiments are only available at discrete p p ¯ invariant mass points below ∼4.2 GeV/c 2 .

4.3. Expectation of the Nucleon EMFFs Measurements through ISR Technique

The disadvantage of the ISR process for the proton EMFFs measurement is obviously that the statistics are much lower compared to the direct annihilation process, therefore very high luminosity is necessary to compensate. The Belle-II experiment on the B-factory SuperKEKB is starting data collection and will be able to contribute to the proton EMFFs study in the future. The Belle-II experiment has the goal of obtaining a total integrated luminosity of 50 ab 1 in the c.m. energy range from 9.46 to 11.24 GeV, and it has planned to collect ∼5 ab 1 integrated luminosity in 2020 [58]. According to a recent report, the plan is delayed and an integrated luminosity of 231 fb 1 was accumulated until 2021 [59]. The BESIII experiment is continuing to collect data between 2.00 and 4.95 GeV, where many large datasets might be helpful to improve measurements of the proton EMFFs in a large q 2 range, and it is even possible to access other baryon-antibaryon channels. The BESIII experiment has accumulated large luminosity datasets above 3.770 GeV. The datasets, which can be used for the baryon EMFFs measurements with the ISR technique, are estimated to be ∼22 fb 1 until 2021 [60]. In the next two years, BESIII will collect data at s = 3.773 GeV to obtain a total luminosity up to 20 fb 1 (including the 2.9 fb 1 from previous data) [61]. Considering that one disadvantage of the ISR technique is worse resolution of the p p ¯ invariant mass, the BESIII experiment also plans to explore the nucleon production threshold region through a direct annihilation process by taking data below 2.0 GeV [62].
Regarding the expected luminosities from both experiments in the next few years, research on the EMFFs of the proton may achieve significant progress with the ISR technique, especially for the EMFFs ratio of the proton close to the p p ¯ threshold region, where the detection efficiency is almost zero for the low momentum proton/antiproton tracks produced from the direct annihilation process.

4.4. Summary

The ISR technique to analyze proton EMFFs is not only a complementary method, but also has the advantages of accessing the proton–antiproton threshold and to improve the precision of the ratio measurement with full proton angular distribution analysis. The BABAR experiment started the proton EMFFs research with the ISR technique, and the results of the proton EMFFs ratio show a tension on the ratio of the proton EMFFs to the results from previous experiment PS170. The BESIII experiment performed the proton EMFFs measurements through the direct annihilation and ISR processes with different datasets, very high precision for the measurements on the e + e p p ¯ cross section and the FFs (ratio) is achieved from the direct annihilation analysis, and the large invariant mass range from the p p ¯ -threshold to 3.8 GeV/c 2 is covered from the ISR analyses. Future measurements with a higher precision, in particular close to the p p ¯ threshold, will enhance our knowledge of the proton EMFFs in the time-like region.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, D.L., A.D. and F.M.; Formal analysis, D.L., A.D. and F.M.; Funding acquisition, D.L. and F.M.; Investigation, D.L., A.D. and F.M.; Methodology, D.L., A.D. and F.M.; Supervision, F.M.; Validation, D.L., A.D. and F.M.; Writing—original draft, D.L. and A.D.; Writing—review & editing, D.L., A.D. and F.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work is supported in part by the 100 Talents Program of CAS; the Key Research Program of CAS under grant No. XDB34030301, and ERC under contract No. 758462; European Union Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under contract No. Marie Shlodowska-Curie grant agreement No. 645664, 872901 and 894790; German Research Foundation DFG under contract No. 443159800 and Collaborative Research Center CRC 1044.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The original data are made publicly available by the referred collaborations.

Acknowledgments

Authors would like to thank the editors of the special issue of the journal, Monica Bertani, Simone Pacetti and Alessio Mangoni for the organization and helps. Authors would like to thank Guangshun Huang for organizing and coordinating the papers for the special issue, and thank Christoph Rosner and Lei Xia for their careful reading and valuable suggestions for this paper.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Denig, A.; Salmè, G. Nucleon electromagnetic form factors in the timelike region. Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 2013, 68, 113–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Pacetti, S.; Baldini Ferroli, R.; Tomasi-Gustafsson, E. Proton electromagnetic form factors: Basic notions, present achievements and future perspectives. Phys. Rep. 2015, 550–551, 1–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Dubničková, A.Z.; Dubnička, S. Pront EM Form Factors Data Are in Disagreement with New σtot( e + e p p ¯ ) Measurements. arXiv 2020, arXiv:2010.15872. [Google Scholar]
  4. Kuraev, E.A.; Dbeyssi, A.; Tomasi-Gustafsson, E. A model for space and time-like proton (neutron) form factors. Phys. Lett. B 2012, 712, 240–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Baier, V.N.; Khoze, V.A. Photon emission in muon pair production in electron-positron collisions. Sov. Phys. JETP 1965, 21, 629–632. [Google Scholar]
  6. Baier, V.N.; Khoze, V.A. Radiation accompanying two particle annihilation of an electron-positron pair. Sov. Phys. JETP 1965, 21, 1145–1150. [Google Scholar]
  7. Arbuzov, A.B.; Kuraef, E.A.; Merenkov, N.P.; Trentadue, L. Hadronic cross-sections in electron-positron annihilation with tagged photon. JHEP 1998, 12, 009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Benayoun, M.; Eidelman, S.I.; Ivanchenko, V.N.; Silagadze, Z.K. Spectroscopy at B factories using hard photon emission. Mod. Phys. Lett. A 1999, 14, 2605–2614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Binner, S.; Kühn, J.H.; Melnikov, K. Measuring σ( e + e hadrons) using tagged photon. Phys. Lett. B 1999, 459, 279–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Konchatnij, M.I.; Merenkov, N.P. Scanning of hadron cross-section at DAPHNE by analysis of initial state radiative events. JETP Lett. 1999, 69, 811–818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Rodrigo, G.; Gehrmann-De Ridder, A.; Guilleaume, M.; Kühn, J.H. NLO QED corrections to ISR in e+e annihilation and the measurement of σ(e+ehadrons) using tagged photons. Eur. Phys. J. C 2001, 22, 81–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Rodrigo, G.; Czyż, H.; Kühn, J.H.; Szopa, M. Radiative return at NLO and the measurement of the hadronic cross-section in electron positron annihilation. Eur. Phys. J. C 2002, 24, 71–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Czyz, H.; Kuhn, J.H. Four pion final states with tagged photons at electron positron colliders. Eur. Phys. J. C 2001, 18, 497–509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Aubert, B.; Bazan, A.; Boucham, A.; Boutigny, D.; De Bonis, I.; Favier, J.; Gaillard, J.-M.; Jeremie, A.; Karyotakis, Y.; Le Flour, T.; et al. The BABAR detector. Nucl. Inst. Meth. Phys. Res. A 2002, 479, 1–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Aubert, B.; Barate, R.; Boutigny, D.; Couderc, F.; Karyotakis, Y.; Lees, J.P.; Poireau, V.; Tisserand, V.; Zghiche, A.; Grauges, E.; et al. Stuty of e + e p p ¯ using initial state radiation with BABAR. Phys. Rev. D 2006, 73, 012005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Lees, J.P.; Poireau, V.; Tisserand, V.; Grauges, E.; Palano, A.; Eigen, G.; Stugu, B.; Brown, D.N.; Kerth, L.T.; Kolomensky, Y.G.; et al. Stuty of e + e p p ¯ via initial-state radiation at BABAR. Phys. Rev. D 2013, 87, 092005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Lees, J.P.; Poireau, V.; Tisserand, V.; Grauges, E.; Palano, A.; Eigen, G.; Stugu, B.; Brown, D.N.; Kerth, L.T.; Kolomensky, Y.G.; et al. Measurement of e + e p p ¯ cross section in the energy range from 3.0 to 6.5 GeV. Phys. Rev. D 2013, 88, 072009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Aubert, B.; Bona, M.; Boutigny, D.; Karyotakis, Y.; Lees, J.P.; Poireau, V.; Prudent, X.; Tisserand, V.; Zghiche, A.; Garra Tico, J.; et al. Study of e + e Λ Λ ¯ , Λ Σ ¯ 0 , Σ Σ ¯ 0 using initial state radiation with BABAR. Phys. Rev. D 2007, 76, 092006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Pakhlova, G.; Adachi1, I.; Aihara, H.; Arinstein, K.; Aulchenko, V.; Aushev, T.; Bakich, A.M.; Balagura, V.; Bedny, I.; Bhardwaj, V.; et al. Observation of a near-threshold enhancement in the e + e Λ c Λ ¯ c cross section using initial-state radiation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2008, 101, 172001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  20. Ablikim, M.; Achasov, M.N.; Adlarson, V.; Ahmed, S.; Albrecht, M.; Alekseev, M.; Amoroso, V.; An, F.F.; An, Q.; Bai, Y.; et al. Study of the process e + e p p ¯ via initial state radiation at BESIII. Phys. Rev. D 2019, 99, 092002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Ablikim, M.; Achasov, M.N.; Adlarson, V.; Ahmed, S.; Albrecht, M.; Aliberti, R.; Amoroso, V.; An, M.R.; An, Q.; Bai, X.H.; et al. Measurement of proton electromagnetic form factors in the time-like region using initial state radiation at BESIII. Phys. Lett. B 2021, 817, 136328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Aubert, B.; Karyotakis, Y.; Lees, J.P.; Poireau, V.; Prencipe, E.; Prudent, X.; Tisserand, V.; Garra Tico, J.; Grauges, E.; Martinelli, M.; et al. Precise measurement of the e+eπ+π(γ) cross section with the initial state radiation method at BABAR. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2009, 103, 231801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Lees, J.P.; Poireau, V.; Tisserand, V.; Grauges, E.; Palano, A.; Eigen, G.; Stugu, B.; Brown, D.N.; Kerth, L.T.; Kolomensky, Y.G.; et al. Precision measurement of the e+eK+K(γ) cross section with the initial-state radiation method at BABAR. Phys. Rev. D 2013, 88, 032013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Lees, J.P.; Poireau, V.; Tisserand, V.; Grauges, E.; Palano, A.; Eigen, G.; Stugu, B.; Brown, D.N.; Kerth, L.T.; Kolomensky, Y.G.; et al. Study of the e+eK+K reaction in the energy range from 2.6 to 8.0 GeV. Phys. Rev. D 2015, 92, 072008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Aloisio, A.; Ambrosino, F.; Antonelli, A.; Antonelli, M.; Bacci, C.; Barva, M.; Bencivenni, G.; Bertolucci, S.; Bini, C.; Bloise, C.; et al. Measurement of σ(e+eπ+πγ) and extraction of σ(e+eπ+π) below 1-GeV with the KLOE detector. Phys. Lett. B 2005, 606, 12–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Ambrosino, F.; Antonelli, A.; Antonelli, M.; Archilli, F.; Bacci, C.; Beltrame, P.; Bencivenni, G.; Bertolucci, S.; Bini, C.; Bloise, C.; et al. Measurement of σ(e+eπ+πγ(γ) and the dipion contribution to the muon anomaly with the KLOE detector. Phys. Lett. B 2009, 670, 285–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Babusci, D.; Badoni, D.; Balwierz-Pytko, I.; Bencivenni, G.; Bini, C.; Bloise, C.; Bossi, F.; Branchini, P.; Budano, A.; Caldeira Balkeståhl, L.; et al. Precision measurement of σ(e+eπ+πγ)/σ(e+eμ+μγ) and determination of the π+π contribution to the muon anomaly with the KLOE detector. Phys. Lett. B 2013, 720, 336–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Ambrosino, F.; Archilli, F.; Beltrame, P.; Bencivenni, G.; Bini, C.; Bloise, C.; Bocchetta, S.; Bossi, F.; Branchini, P.; Capon, G.; et al. Measurement of σ(e+eπ+π) from threshold to 0.85 GeV2 using Initial State Radiation with the KLOE detector. Phys. Lett. B 2011, 700, 102–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Ablikim, M.; Achasov, M.N.; Ai, X.C.; Albayrak, O.; Albrecht, M.; Ambrose, D.J.; Amoroso, A.; An, F.F.; An, Q.; Bai, J.Z.; et al. Measurement of the e+eπ+π cross section between 600 and 900 MeV using initial state radiation. Phys. Lett. B 2021, 753, 629–638, Erratum in Phys. Lett. B 2021, 812, 135982.. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Xia, L.; Rosner, C.; Wang, Y.D.; Zhou, X.R.; Maas, F.E.; Baldini Ferroli, R.; Hu, H.M.; Huang, G.S. Proton Electromagnetic Form Factors in the Time-like Region through the Scan Technique. arXiv 2021, arXiv:2111.13009. [Google Scholar]
  31. Larin, P.; Zhou, X.R.; Hu, J.F.; Maas, F.; Baldini Ferroli, R.; Hu, H.M.; Huang, G.S. Electromagnetic Structure of the Neutron from Annihilation Reactions. under review.
  32. Zichichi, A.; Berman, S.M.; Cabibbo, N.; Gatto, R. Proton anti-proton annihilation into electrons, muons and vector bosons. Nuovo Cim. 1962, 24, 170–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Baldini Ferroli, R.; Pacetti, S.; Zallo, A. No Sommerfeld resummation factor in e + e p p ¯ ? Eur. Phys. J. A 2012, 48, 33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Bonneau, G.; Martin, F. Hard photon emission in e+e reactions. Nucl. Phys. B 1971, 27, 381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Druzhinin, V.P.; Eidelman, S.I.; Serednyakov, S.I.; Solodov, E.P. Hadron Production via e+e Collisions with Initial State Radiation. Rev. Mod. Phys. 2011, 83, 1545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Caffo, M.; Czyz, H.; Remiddi, E. BHAGEN95: A Monte Carlo program for Bhabha scattering at LEP-1/SLC and LEP-2 energies. Nuovo Cim. A 1997, 110, 515–536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Caffo, M.; Czyz, H.; Remiddi, E. Order-α2 leading logarithmic corrections in Bhabha scattering at LEP/SLC energies. Phys. Lett. B 1994, 327, 369–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Czyz, H.; Kühn, J.H.; Nowak, E.; Rodrigo, G. Nucleon form-factors, B meson factories and the radiative return. Eur. Phys. J. C 2004, 35, 527–536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Czyz, H.; Kuehn, J.H.; Tracz, S. Nucleon form factors and final state radiative corrections to e + e p p ¯ γ . Phys. Rev. D 2014, 38, 114021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Kühn, J.H.; Rodrigo, G. The Radiative return at small angles: Virtual corrections. Eur. Phys. J. C 2002, 25, 215–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Czyz, H.; Grzelinska, A.; Kühn, J.H.; Rodrigo, G. The Radiative return at ϕ- and B-factories: Small angle photon emission at next-to-leading order. Eur. Phys. J. C 2003, 27, 563–575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Czyz, H.; Grzelinska, A.; Kühn, J.H.; Rodrigo, G. The Radiative return at ϕ- and B-factories: FSR for muon pair production at next-to-leading order. Eur. Phys. J. C 2005, 39, 411–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Bytev, V.V.; Kuraev, E.A.; Tomasi-Gustafsson, E.; Pacetti, S. Influence of final state radiation in the process e + e p ¯ + p (γ). Phys. Rev. D 2011, 84, 017301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Patrignani, C.; Agashe, K.; Aielli, G.; Amsler, C.; Antonelli, M.; Asner, D.M.; Baer, H.; Banerjee, S.; Barnett, R.M.; Basaglia, T.; et al. Review of Particle Physics. Chin. Phys. C 2016, 40, 100001. [Google Scholar]
  45. Carlin, R.; The PS170 Collaboration. The proton electromagnetic form factor ( p p ¯ e + e ). Nucl. Phys. B 1989, 8, 203–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Ablikim, M.; Achasov, M.N.; Adlarson, P.; Ahmed, S.; Albrecht, M.; Alekseev, M.; Amoroso, A.; An, F.F.; An, Q.; Anita; et al. Measurement of Proton Electromagnetic Form Factor in e + e p p ¯ in the Energy retion 2.00–3.08 GeV. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2020, 124, 042001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  47. Akhmetshin, R.R.; Amirkhanov, A.N.; Anisenkov, A.V.; Aulchenko, V.M.; Banzarov, V.S.; Bashtovoy, N.S.; Berkaev, D.E.; Bondar, A.E.; Bragin, A.V.; Eidelman, S.I.; et al. Study of the process e + e p p ¯ in the c.m. energy range form threshold to 2 GeV with the CMD-3 detector. Phys. Lett. B 2016, 759, 634–640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Tomasi-Gustafsson, E.; Bianconi, A.; Pacetti, S. New fit of timelike proton electromagnetic formfactors from e+e colliders. Phys. Rev. C 2021, 103, 035203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Belushkin, M.A.; Hammer, H.-W.; Meißner, U.-G. Dispersion analysis of the nucleon form factors including meson continua. Phys. Rev. C 2007, 75, 035202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Bijker, R.; Iachello, F. Reanalysis of the nucleon spacelike and timelike electromagnetic form factors in a two-component model. Phys. Rev. C 2004, 69, 068201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Lomon, E.L.; Pacetti, S. Timelike and spacelike electromagnetic form factors of nucleons, a unified description. Phys. Rev. D 2012, 85, 113004, Erratum in Phys. Rev. D 2012, 86, 039901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. de Melo, J.P.B.C.; Frederico, T.; Pace, E.; Pisano, S.; Salmè, G. Timelike and spacelike nucleon electromagnetic form factors beyond relativistic constituent quark models. Phys. Lett. B 2009, 671, 153–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Alberto, P.; Drago, A.; Mangoni, A.; Moretti, S.; Pacetti, S. Analytic continuation of nucleon electromagnetic form factors in the time-like region. J. Phys. G Nucl. Part. Phys. 2021, 48, 085007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Lorenz, I.T.; Hammer, H.-W.; Meißner, U.-G. New structure in the proton-antiproton system. Phys. Rev. D 2015, 92, 034018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Cao, X.; Dai, J.P. Timelike nucleon electromagnetic form factors: All about interference of isospin amplitudes. arXiv 2021, arXiv:2109.15132. [Google Scholar]
  56. Bianconi, A.; Tomasi-Gustafsson, E. Phenomenological analysis of near-threshold periodic modulations of the proton timelike form factor. Phys. Rev. C 2016, 93, 035201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Bianconi, A.; Tomasi-Gustafsson, E. Periodic interference structures in the timelike proton form factor. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2015, 114, 232301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Kou, E.; Urquijo, P.; Altmannshofer, W.; Beaujean, F.; Bell, G.; Beneke, M.; Bigi, I.I.; Bishara, F.; Blanke, M.; Bobeth, C.; et al. The Belle II Physics Book. Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2019, 123C01, 1–654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Onuki, Y. Belle II: Status and prospects. In Proceedings of the QCD21—24th High Energy Physcis International Conference, Montpellier, France, 5–9 July 2021. [Google Scholar]
  60. The BESIII Experiment. User Information—Data Sets. Available online: http://english.ihep.cas.cn/bes/doc/2250.html (accessed on 28 November 2021).
  61. Ablikim, M.; Achasov, M.N.; Adlarson, P.; Ahmed, S.; Albrecht, M.; Alekseev, M.; Amoroso, A.; An, F.F.; An, Q.; Bai, Y.; et al. Future Physics Programme of BESIII. Chin. Phys. C 2020, 44, 040001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Huang, G.S.; Baldini Ferroli, R. Probing the internal structure of baryons. Natl. Sci. Rev. 2021, 8, nwab187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Feynman diagram under assumption of one virtual photon exchange for the annihilation process of e + e p p ¯ .
Figure 1. Feynman diagram under assumption of one virtual photon exchange for the annihilation process of e + e p p ¯ .
Symmetry 14 00091 g001
Figure 2. Lowest order Feynman diagram of the process e + e p p ¯ γ assuming one virtual photon exchange, where γ is a real photon emitted from the initial state.
Figure 2. Lowest order Feynman diagram of the process e + e p p ¯ γ assuming one virtual photon exchange, where γ is a real photon emitted from the initial state.
Symmetry 14 00091 g002
Figure 3. The p p ¯ invariant mass spectrum from BABAR LA-ISR (a) and SA-ISR (b) analyses [16,17].
Figure 3. The p p ¯ invariant mass spectrum from BABAR LA-ISR (a) and SA-ISR (b) analyses [16,17].
Symmetry 14 00091 g003
Figure 4. The p p ¯ invariant mass spectrum from BESIII ISR analyses: (a) from LA-ISR analysis, the blue histogram represents the background events from e + e p p ¯ π 0 process [21], (b) from SA-ISR analysis [20].
Figure 4. The p p ¯ invariant mass spectrum from BESIII ISR analyses: (a) from LA-ISR analysis, the blue histogram represents the background events from e + e p p ¯ π 0 process [21], (b) from SA-ISR analysis [20].
Symmetry 14 00091 g004
Figure 5. The cross section for the process e + e p p ¯ (a) and the effective FF of the proton (b) [21]. The experimental data presented also include measurements from direct annihilation process. The details of the plots are described in the Ref. [21].
Figure 5. The cross section for the process e + e p p ¯ (a) and the effective FF of the proton (b) [21]. The experimental data presented also include measurements from direct annihilation process. The details of the plots are described in the Ref. [21].
Symmetry 14 00091 g005
Figure 6. Examples of proton angular distributions including a fit to extract the ratio of the proton FFs from the BABAR (a) and BESIII (b) LA-ISA analyses (threshold-1.95 GeV/c 2 ), and the BESIII SA-ISR (c) analysis (2.3–2.6 GeV/c 2 ). The details of the plots are described in the original references [16,20,21].
Figure 6. Examples of proton angular distributions including a fit to extract the ratio of the proton FFs from the BABAR (a) and BESIII (b) LA-ISA analyses (threshold-1.95 GeV/c 2 ), and the BESIII SA-ISR (c) analysis (2.3–2.6 GeV/c 2 ). The details of the plots are described in the original references [16,20,21].
Symmetry 14 00091 g006
Figure 7. The ratio of the proton FFs from BABAR and BESIII LA-ISR analyses at the p p ¯ invariant mass region of threshold-3.0 GeV/c 2 , and from BESIII SA-ISR analysis at the mass region of 2.0–3.0 GeV/c 2 . Results also include measurements from PS170, BESIII (direct annihilation) and CMD-3 experiments [45,46,47]. The dotted line is the fit result in Ref. [48], the dot-dashed line shows a new fit result with the same formula by including both BESIII ISR results, and the grey band shows the standard deviation of this fit.
Figure 7. The ratio of the proton FFs from BABAR and BESIII LA-ISR analyses at the p p ¯ invariant mass region of threshold-3.0 GeV/c 2 , and from BESIII SA-ISR analysis at the mass region of 2.0–3.0 GeV/c 2 . Results also include measurements from PS170, BESIII (direct annihilation) and CMD-3 experiments [45,46,47]. The dotted line is the fit result in Ref. [48], the dot-dashed line shows a new fit result with the same formula by including both BESIII ISR results, and the grey band shows the standard deviation of this fit.
Symmetry 14 00091 g007
Figure 8. Periodic oscillation structure of the proton effective FF [21]. The dotted line represents the oscillation contribution, which is described by Equation (12) and the value of fit parameters are taken from Ref. [56].
Figure 8. Periodic oscillation structure of the proton effective FF [21]. The dotted line represents the oscillation contribution, which is described by Equation (12) and the value of fit parameters are taken from Ref. [56].
Symmetry 14 00091 g008
Table 1. Information of the proton EMFFs measurements with LA- and SA-ISR analyses at BABAR and BESIII experiments.
Table 1. Information of the proton EMFFs measurements with LA- and SA-ISR analyses at BABAR and BESIII experiments.
ISR Analysis s (Range)
[GeV]
L int
[fb 1 ]
q 2 Range [GeV/c 2 ]Total Events
on σ p p ¯
on σ p p ¯ ( G eff )on R em
BABAR LA [16]10.584691.877–4.51.877–3.06876.0 ± 107.2
BABAR SA [17]3.0–6.5-140.0 ± 13.2
BESIII LA [21]3.773–4.607.51.876–3.02952.2 ± 75.4
BESIII SA [20]2.0–3.82.0–3.06714.2 ± 87.4
Table 2. A simple comparison for the precision of the proton FFs ratio measured by the ISR process and the direct annihilation process from BABAR, BESIII and CMD-3 experiments. [Note: the uncertainty of the proton FFs ratio ( Δ R em / R em ) is statistical only, except the one from BESIII SA-ISR analysis].
Table 2. A simple comparison for the precision of the proton FFs ratio measured by the ISR process and the direct annihilation process from BABAR, BESIII and CMD-3 experiments. [Note: the uncertainty of the proton FFs ratio ( Δ R em / R em ) is statistical only, except the one from BESIII SA-ISR analysis].
q [GeV/c]N evt Δ N evt / N evt Δ R em / R em Experiment
2.025–2.10013282.74%10.79%BABAR LA-ISR [16]
2.025–2.1005604.23%18.49%BESIII LA-ISR [21]
2.0–2.342831.53%∼23.39%BESIII SA-ISA [20]
2.125503120.45%3.39%BESIII energy scan [46]
1.92–2.0025771.97%15.44%CMD-3 (combined) [47]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lin, D.; Dbeyssi, A.; Maas, F. Time-like Proton Form Factors with Initial State Radiation Technique. Symmetry 2022, 14, 91. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym14010091

AMA Style

Lin D, Dbeyssi A, Maas F. Time-like Proton Form Factors with Initial State Radiation Technique. Symmetry. 2022; 14(1):91. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym14010091

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lin, Dexu, Alaa Dbeyssi, and Frank Maas. 2022. "Time-like Proton Form Factors with Initial State Radiation Technique" Symmetry 14, no. 1: 91. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym14010091

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop