Next Article in Journal
Net Global Warming Potential of Spring Wheat Cropping Systems in a Semiarid Region
Next Article in Special Issue
One City for All? The Characteristics of Residential Displacement in Southwest Washington, DC
Previous Article in Journal
Analysis of High Temporal Resolution Land Use/Land Cover Trajectories
Previous Article in Special Issue
Expropriation of Real Property in Kigali City: Scoping the Patterns of Spatial Justice
Open AccessArticle

Land Governance in Post-Conflict Settings: Interrogating Decision-Making by International Actors

ZOA International, Sleutelbloemstraat 45, AC Apeldoorn 7320, The Netherlands
Received: 20 December 2018 / Revised: 25 January 2019 / Accepted: 6 February 2019 / Published: 7 February 2019
Humanitarian and development organizations working in conflict-affected settings have a particular responsibility to do no harm and contribute to the wellbeing of the population without bias. The highly complex, politicized realities of work in conflict- and post-conflict settings often require quick, pragmatic and results-oriented decisions, the foundations of which remain frequently implicit. Such decisions might follow an intrinsic logic or situational pragmatism rather than intensive deliberation. This paper reflects on the realities of working on land governance in post-conflict settings shaped by migration, ethnic division, power struggles and limited statehood. Using case examples from the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and Burundi, this paper reflects on the drivers of decisions around land governance in such contexts in a structured, theoretically informed way. Drawing on the author’s own experience with supporting land rights work and utilizing Giddens’ concept of the Duality of Structure, this article provides an analysis of actors and structures that sheds light on the factors that affect the decision-making of practitioners relating to land rights in post-conflict areas of limited statehood. View Full-Text
Keywords: land rights; land governance; limited statehood; governance; conflict; decision-making land rights; land governance; limited statehood; governance; conflict; decision-making
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Betge, D. Land Governance in Post-Conflict Settings: Interrogating Decision-Making by International Actors. Land 2019, 8, 31.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Search more from Scilit
 
Search
Back to TopTop