Next Article in Journal
Correction: Jaramillo, F.; et al. Priorities and Interactions of Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) with Focus on Wetlands. Water 2019, 11, 619
Next Article in Special Issue
Dynamic Evapotranspiration Alters Hyporheic Flow and Residence Times in the Intrameander Zone
Previous Article in Journal
The GEOframe-NewAge Modelling System Applied in a Data Scarce Environment
Previous Article in Special Issue
A New Water Environmental Load and Allocation Modeling Framework at the Medium–Large Basin Scale
Open AccessArticle

An Assessment of Self-Purification in Streams

Department of Environmental Protection and Water Engineering, Faculty of Environmental Engineering, Vilnius Gediminas technical university; Saulėtekio al. 11, LT-10223 Vilnius, Lithuania
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Water 2020, 12(1), 87; https://doi.org/10.3390/w12010087
Received: 14 November 2019 / Revised: 20 December 2019 / Accepted: 21 December 2019 / Published: 25 December 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue A Systems Approach of River and River Basin Restoration)
The territory of Lithuania is characterized by a prevailing moisture excess, therefore in order to timely remove excess water from arable lands, the drainage systems have long been installed. In order to drain excess water people used to dig trenches, to regulate (deepen or straighten) natural streams. The length of regulated streams has reached 46,000 km and they are deteriorated ecosystems. Investigations showed that the self-purification of streams from nitrates and phosphates is more effective in natural stretches than in stretches regulated for drainage purposes. Decrease in the average concentration of nitrates in natural and regulated stretches are 8.8 ± 5.0 and 3.0 ± 2.9 mg NO 3 L−1, respectively. The average coefficient of nitrate self-purification, at a confidence level of 95% in natural stream stretches is 0.50 ± 0.22, and in regulated is −0.15 ± 0.21 km−1, and this difference is essential. The change in the average concentration of phosphates in natural and regulated stretches is almost the same, 0.2 ± 0.1 and 0.2 ± 0.2 mg PO 4 3 L−1, respectively. The average coefficient of phosphate self-purification, at a confidence level of 95%, in natural stream stretches is 0.28 ± 0.12, in regulated −0.14 ± 0.12 km−1, and this difference is not essential. In terms of the need for the renovation of drainage systems it is suggested that soft naturalization measures are first applied in the streams of Western (Samogitian) Highlands, Coastal Lowlands, and South-Eastern Highlands to improve their self-purification processes. View Full-Text
Keywords: water quality in streams; self-purification; nitrates; phosphates water quality in streams; self-purification; nitrates; phosphates
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Šaulys, V.; Survilė, O.; Stankevičienė, R. An Assessment of Self-Purification in Streams. Water 2020, 12, 87.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop