Next Article in Journal
Environmental Flow Assessment Considering Inter- and Intra-Annual Streamflow Variability under the Context of Non-Stationarity
Next Article in Special Issue
Monitoring Water Resources Governance Progress Globally: Experiences from Monitoring SDG Indicator 6.5.1 on Integrated Water Resources Management Implementation
Previous Article in Journal
Trace Organic Removal during River Bank Filtration for Two Types of Sediment
Previous Article in Special Issue
Establishing Sustainable Development Goal Baselines for Household Drinking Water, Sanitation and Hygiene Services
Open AccessArticle

Moving Up the Ladder: Assessing Sanitation Progress through a Total Service Gap

WaterAid, London SE11 5JD, UK
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Water 2018, 10(12), 1735;
Received: 30 September 2018 / Revised: 20 November 2018 / Accepted: 21 November 2018 / Published: 26 November 2018
The Sustainable Development Goals create ambitious targets for achieving universal access to safely managed sanitation by 2030. The core indicator for SDG 6.2 creates positive incentives for governments, and development partners to invest in the whole sanitation chain, recognising the public health benefits of managing waste beyond initial containment. However, the target and indicators also create risks. Global accountability could be undermined by the challenge of accounting for progress across different service levels below the target of safely managed. There could also be perverse incentives to upgrade existing services, in order to meet the benchmark of safely managed, at the expense of extending basic services to those currently unserved. This paper examines methodological options for calculating a ‘total service gap’, a measure that would combine data on each rung of the service ladder to quantify how far away each country is from universal safely managed services. It conducts a sensitivity analysis to assess the validity of using uniform service level weights, and finds that this approach could add value to existing metrics. Through alternative data visualisations and other devices, it is argued that the total service gap could help to address the risks surrounding global accountability and perverse incentives. View Full-Text
Keywords: sanitation; monitoring; sustainable development goals; accountability sanitation; monitoring; sustainable development goals; accountability
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Kempster, S.; Hueso, A. Moving Up the Ladder: Assessing Sanitation Progress through a Total Service Gap. Water 2018, 10, 1735.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

Search more from Scilit
Back to TopTop