Characteristics and Driving Mechanisms of Net Ecosystem Productivity in a Subtropical Moso Bamboo Forest Based on XGBoost

Abstract

As a critical agroforestry crop in Southern China, Moso bamboo, maintains regional timber security and bamboo shoot production, with its net ecosystem productivity (NEP) directly determining dry matter accumulation and economic yield. This study integrates 2024 continuous flux observations with XGBoost and SHAP explanations to characterize the subtropical bamboo forest carbon budget and its nonlinear driving mechanisms. The results show a weak carbon sink in 2024 with an annual cumulative NEP of 120 g C m⁻², as high respiration of 860 g C m⁻² limited organic matter conversion by consuming nearly 88% of the 980 g C m⁻² total primary production. The peak production period during May and June was offset by growth stagnation in August, caused by extreme heat and drought. Net radiation served as the primary driver, with a positive contribution threshold of 75.28 W m⁻², whereas precipitation exceeding 1.85 mm or air temperatures over 17.85 °C hindered carbon accumulation through radiation attenuation and metabolic heat loss. Strong radiation–precipitation interactions confirm that water’s impacts on yield are deeply contingent upon radiation backgrounds. These nonlinear regulatory pathways provide a scientific foundation for stabilizing bamboo forest productivity through synergistic water-radiation management and structural optimization during extreme climate events.

1. Introduction

Terrestrial carbon cycling serves as the fundamental process for understanding material exchange between the land and atmosphere and holds significant importance for predicting regional climate, carbon balance, and ecosystem responses to global change [1,2,3,4,5]. The accumulation of net ecosystem productivity (NEP) is driven by net radiation (Rn) and co-regulated by vegetation physiology, canopy structure, and environmental factors [6,7,8]. As a critical hub connecting biological and physical processes, this process directly determines the net dry matter increment after respiratory losses and has emerged as a frontier in land–atmosphere interaction research within agroforestry ecosystems [9,10,11].

Moso bamboo ecosystems are widely distributed in global subtropical regions and possess substantial ecological and agricultural economic value [12,13]. Their unique physiological characteristics, such as rapid growth, evergreen nature, and tall canopy structures, differentiate their carbon allocation patterns and regulatory mechanisms from typical forest and grassland systems [14,15,16]. While previous studies have noted the high photosynthetic potential and carbon sequestration capacity of Moso bamboo, the process shows marked sensitivity to extreme weather [17,18,19]. Existing studies have shown that, under humid environments with sufficient water availability, Moso bamboo forests typically exhibit high carbon sequestration capacity where NEP is primarily driven by Rn and thermal conditions [17,20,21]. Conversely, during drought years or periods of severe water deficit, the carbon sink strength significantly weakens as the vapor pressure deficit (VPD) elevates, and soil moisture limitations trigger stomatal regulation that suppresses net carbon gain or even shifts the ecosystem toward a carbon source [22,23,24]. In addition, Quantitative analysis demonstrated that Moso bamboo forests possess high carbon sequestration potential, with an annual NEP reaching 602.7 g C m⁻², and confirmed that extreme summer drought events could lead to a significant reduction in carbon uptake by 60–78% [17].

Despite existing progress, carbon budget research has predominantly focused on temperate forests [25], grasslands [26], and croplands [27], leaving the dynamic characteristics, driving mechanisms, and nonlinear biophysical processes of subtropical bamboo forests under extreme climate conditions insufficiently understood. In particular, the complex nonlinear interactions among key environmental drivers such as Rn, VPD, and soil moisture in shaping NEP variation remain an unresolved challenge [28,29,30].

Based on these considerations, this study focuses on typical subtropical Moso bamboo as the research subject and utilizes continuous flux observations throughout 2024 to achieve several objectives. This study first evaluates the total net productivity of the bamboo ecosystem and characterizes its annual evolutionary patterns. Subsequently, XGBoost machine learning algorithms are employed to analyze the relative contributions environmental and biophysical parameters make to NEP variation and identify the key environmental thresholds limiting material accumulation. Finally, this research explores the complex interactive mechanisms among driving factors and their synergistic regulatory effects on annual yield. Clarifying these issues will reveal the productivity fluctuations of subtropical bamboo forests under frequent climatic extremes and provide critical references for optimizing stand management and ensuring agricultural output.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Site Description

The primary data collection was anchored at the Jinyun Mountain National Field Scientific Observation and Research Station of Forest Ecosystem in the Three Gorges Reservoir Area, situated within the Chongqing Jinyun Mountain National Nature Reserve. The geographical matrix of the study zone spans from 106°17′ to 106°24′ E and 29°41′ to 29°52′ N. Within this mountainous terrain, the vertical gradient ranges from 350.0 to 951.5 m in elevation, while the experimental plot used for flux monitoring maintains a persistent mean slope of 20 degrees. The flux tower covers a representative source area of approximately 60–100 ha, determined by the footprint analysis (Figure 1). The environmental regime is strictly regulated by a humid subtropical monsoon climate, with a mean annual temperature of 10.4 °C. Monthly thermal fluctuations are characterized by a pronounced amplitude, ranging from a minimum mean of 4.8 °C in January to a maximum of 24.3 °C in August, while extreme summer heatwaves frequently surpass the 35 °C threshold. Hydrological patterns are synchronized with the thermal cycle where the annual precipitation of 1611.8 mm exhibits a high seasonal concentration, namely, over 70 percent of the total rainfall occurs during the monsoonal window from April to October. Given its extensive coverage and ecological significance, Moso bamboo, namely Phyllostachys edulis, was prioritized as the focal taxa for evaluating carbon sequestration dynamics, namely, net ecosystem productivity or NEP.

2.2. Flux Observation and Meteorological Monitoring

The site is equipped with an open path eddy covariance (EC) system and an automated micrometeorological system. The EC system includes a CO₂/H₂O infrared analyzer (Li-7500; LI-COR, Lincoln, NE, USA) and a three-dimensional sonic anemometer (CSAT-3; Campbell Scientific, Logan, UT, USA), measuring energy fluxes of latent heat (LE) and sensible heat (H) at 10 Hz frequency. Net radiation (Rn) is measured using a net radiometer (CNR-1; Kipp and Zonen, Delft, The Netherlands) comprising four radiometers for incoming and reflected shortwave radiation and incoming and outgoing longwave radiation.

Air temperature (Ta) and humidity (RH) were measured with a temperature and relative humidity probe (HMP60; Vaisala, Helsinki, Finland). Soil water content (SWC) and soil temperature (Ts) at 0–10 cm depth were monitored using soil moisture and temperature sensors (TEROS11; Meter, Pullman, WA, USA). Precipitation (PPT) was recorded via a tipping bucket rain gauge (TE-525M; Texas, Dallas, TX, USA). All meteorological measurements were collected at one-minute intervals and stored as averages over 30 min intervals. Saturated vapor pressure deficit (VPD) was calculated based on Ta and RH measurements from the tower [31].

2.3. Data Processing and NEP Calculation

Raw flux observations were processed using EddyPro 7.0.9 software using standard procedures. Following outlier removal via standard quality control [32], missing CO₂ flux data were addressed via marginal distribution sampling, while the energy balance ratio (EBR) evaluated energy closure to verify observation reliability [33,34]. NEP was defined as the negative of net ecosystem exchange (NEE) to characterize carbon sink and source functions through its positive and negative values. Specifically, a positive NEP value indicates that the ecosystem acts as a net carbon sink, whereas a negative value signifies that it functions as a carbon source.

To investigate energy–water coupling mechanisms, this study calculates the decoupling factor (Ω) to assess the relative influence of net radiation versus vapor pressure deficit on latent heat flux. Values of Ω approaching zero indicate high ecosystem atmosphere coupling, where latent heat flux is primarily driven by atmospheric moisture demand. Additionally, the leaf area index, LAI, reflects the canopy’s structural development, while the Priestley–Taylor coefficient (α) quantifies the water supply limitations on transpiration and their potential impacts on productivity.

Half-hourly canopy conductance Gs (m s⁻¹) is calculated by inverting the Penman–Monteith equation [35]:

$$Gs={\displaystyle \frac{\gamma LE{g}_a}{∆\left(Rn-G\right)+\rho C_{p}VPD{g}_a-LE(∆+\gamma )}}$$

(1)

where γ is the psychrometric constant (kPa K⁻¹), Δ is the rate of VPD change with Ta (kPa K⁻¹), ρ is air density (1.23 kg m⁻³), and Cp is the specific heat of air (J kg⁻¹ K⁻¹). Aerodynamic conductance ga (m s⁻¹) is computed using the Monteith and Unsworth equation [35]:

$$g_a={\left({\displaystyle \frac{U}{U_{*}^2}}+6.2U_{*}^{-0.67}\right)}^{-1}$$

(2)

where U and U* are wind speed and friction velocity (m s⁻¹). The decoupling factor (Ω) is derived from Jarvis and McNaughton [36]:

$$\Omega ={\displaystyle \frac{∆+\gamma }{∆+\gamma (1+\frac{g_a}{G_s})}}$$

(3)

The Priestley–Taylor coefficient (α) is defined as the ratio of measured LE to equilibrium LE (LEeq) [37,38], with LEeq calculated as

$${LE}_{eq}={\displaystyle \frac{∆}{∆+\gamma }}(Rn-G)$$

(4)

where G is soil heat flux (W m⁻²). The surface parameters (Gs, Ω, α) are computed only for non-rainy days. Periods with incident shortwave radiation < 100 W m⁻² are excluded to avoid division by zero and spurious data [39].

2.4. Leaf Area Index

Leaf area index (LAI) serves as the core parameter describing vegetation canopy structure and is defined as the total one-sided leaf area per unit ground surface area. This variable functions as a pivotal nexus integrating biomass accumulation, photosynthetic capacity, and overall ecosystem dynamics. To provide high-resolution canopy information, time-series data records were retrieved from the MODIS product suite distributed by the ORNL DAAC (https://modis.ornl.gov/sites/; accessed on 5 September 2025). Throughout the duration of the monitoring program, the dataset maintained a temporal resolution of 4 days. All spatial information was systematically extracted based on the specific geographical coordinates of the eddy covariance tower.

2.5. Machine Learning Model

To decipher the intricate mechanisms underlying ecosystem processes, this research implemented the Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) architecture [40,41,42]. A daily-scale NEP prediction model for 2024 was developed using the xgboost (version 1.7) and shap (version 0.44) packages in Python 3.10.12 by incorporating ten environmental and biophysical indicators, including net radiation (Rn), soil temperature (Ts), air temperature (Ta), vapor pressure deficit (VPD), leaf area index (LAI), decoupling factor (Ω), Priestley–Taylor coefficient (α), soil water content (SWC), and precipitation (PPT). The dataset was partitioned into a 70 percent training set and a 30 percent independent test set, with the optimized model parameters including a maximum depth of 6 and 600 iterations at a learning rate of 0.02. Model robustness was assessed via the coefficient of determination (R²), Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), and Mean Absolute Error (MAE), while the SHAP framework enabled sensitivity analysis of NEP to drivers through absolute value distributions and dependence plots to characterize marginal effects after accounting for covariate interference [43,44,45].

3. Results

3.1. Temperature Energy Balance Closure Analysis

Linear regression analysis between turbulent energy flux and sensible heat flux plus latent heat flux and available energy net radiation minus soil heat flux, based on 2024 Moso bamboo forest observations, yielded a slope of 0.78 with an intercept of 1.24 W m⁻². A coefficient of determination R² of 0.75 and an energy balance closure of 78 percent for 30 min scale data collectively confirmed the reliability and temporal consistency of flux observations at this site. Density plots further revealed that data points were concentrated near the regression line and primarily distributed within the low-energy range (Figure 2).

3.2. Variation Characteristics of Environmental Factors

The main meteorological and biophysical parameters exhibited distinct temporal dynamics in 2024 (Figure 3). Ta and Ts followed unimodal trends, peaking in mid-August at approximately day 230, with maximum air temperatures approaching 38 °C (Figure 3a). Rn showed variation phases consistent with Ta, yet exhibited higher fluctuation frequencies during the wet season from April to July (Figure 3f). VPD rose sharply from late July through August, reaching a peak above 25 hPa (Figure 3b). PPT events primarily occurred from April to July, maintaining SWC at high levels between 0.25 and 0.35 m³ m⁻³ (Figure 3c). Upon entering August, SWC declined rapidly to below 0.1 m³ m⁻³, causing the α to reach its annual minimum of roughly 0.3, while the Ω also remained at low levels (Figure 3d,e). Although raw LAI observations peaked above 3.0 m² m⁻² in late August, the smoothed LAI curve indicates a seasonal maximum of approximately 1.8 m² m⁻² (Figure 3g).

3.3. Seasonal Dynamics and Annual Cumulative Carbon Fluxes

Carbon flux components of the Moso bamboo forest ecosystem exhibited significant seasonal fluctuations in 2024 (Figure 4a). Seasonal trends in gross primary productivity (GPP) and ecosystem respiration (Reco) were highly consistent, peaking between May and June from day 130 to 180, with maximum daily GPP exceeding 15 g C m⁻² d⁻¹. Daily NEP fluctuated intensely within a range primarily between minus 5.0 and 5.0 g C m⁻² d⁻¹. Cumulative analysis revealed steady growth in both GPP and Reco, reaching annual totals of 980 g C m⁻² and 860 g C m⁻², respectively (Figure 4b). The final cumulative NEP for 2024 remained positive at approximately 120 g C m⁻², confirming that the ecosystem functioned as a carbon sink throughout the year. Furthermore, a distinct decline in the growth slope of the cumulative NEP curve was observed between day 210 and 260, reflecting a significant impairment of productivity during this period.

3.4. Diurnal Variations of Carbon Flux Across Growing and Non-Growing Seasons

Carbon flux components exhibited distinct diurnal dynamics across seasons in 2024 (Figure 5), where growing seasons GPP and NEP showed typical unimodal trends, peaking around 12:30 at approximately 13.0 and 8.0 micro-mol m⁻² s⁻¹, respectively (Figure 5a). In contrast, carbon exchange intensity diminished during the non-growing season, with GPP and NEP peaks retreating to approximately 9.0 and 6.0 μmol m⁻² s⁻¹ (Figure 5b). Reco remained stable throughout the day, with a growing season mean rate of 5.0 μmol m⁻² s⁻¹, which was significantly higher than the 2.5 to 3.0 μmol m⁻² s⁻¹ observed in the non-growing season, while the source to sink transition occurred around 07:30 in both periods as NEP turned positive. Nighttime cessation of photosynthesis-stabilized flux components with nocturnal carbon emission rates maintained at approximately −3.5 and −2.5 μmol m⁻² s⁻¹ for growing and non-growing seasons, respectively.

3.5. Importance Assessment of Driving Factors

Quantitative assessment of NEP drivers based on the XGBoost model yielded a coefficient of determination R² of 0.65, an RMSE of 1.6, and an MAE of 1.22 between the observed and predicted values, confirming the effective explanation of dynamic variations during the observation period (Figure 6a). Among the ten modeling variables, Rn ranked first in relative importance, serving as the core driver, while PPT and α ranked second and third, respectively, followed by Ts, Ta, and LAI. The SHAP summary plot (Figure 6b) reveals that Rn exhibited a significant positive correlation where increased radiation enhanced positive contributions to NEP, whereas PPT and α demonstrated distinct negative driving effects, as indicated by negative SHAP values under high-precipitation or latent heat allocation conditions, which suppressed the ecosystem’s carbon sink capacity. The widest fluctuation range in SHAP values for Rn indicate that its most drastic regulation of carbon flux variated across daily and seasonal scales, while VPD and SWC showed lower contributions compared to model predictions.

3.6. Marginal Effect Analysis of Driving Factors

A dependence plot analysis visually illustrates the nonlinear response characteristics and influence thresholds of the drivers on NEP (Figure 7), where Rn shows a significant positive response with a threshold of 75.28 W m⁻², beyond which contributions shifted from negative to positive and stabilized. In contrast, PPT exerted a significant negative regulation with a critical point of only 1.85 mm, causing rapid SHAP value declines beyond this limit, while contributions of α turned negative when values exceeded 0.51. Ecosystem carbon sink capacity was suppressed when environmental temperatures surpassed the influence thresholds for Ts and Ta at 21.28 and 17.85 °C, respectively. Similar negative driving patterns were observed for VPD and SWC, with critical points of 13.82 hPa and 0.24 m³ m⁻³, while Ω and LAI exhibited distinct threshold effects at 0.76 and 1.07 m² m⁻², respectively.

3.7. Interaction Characteristics of Driving Factors

Interaction strength analysis indicated that the interaction between Rn and PPT was the most significant among all factor combinations, followed by high interaction intensities for Rn with Ts and Rn with α (Figure 8a). Further analysis of the mean SHAP value composition revealed that the total effects for Rn PPT α and Ta primarily originated from their own main effects, whereas interaction effect contributions for Ts Ω LAI VPD and SWC exceeded their corresponding main effects (Figure 8b).

In Figure 9a,b, there is a significant interaction between PPT and Rn. At the same PPT level, particularly when PPT is near zero, high Rn consistently corresponds to higher SHAP values than low Rn. In Figure 9c, for the same alpha value, high Rn results in higher SHAP values than low Rn.

4. Discussion

4.1. Carbon Budget Characteristics of Moso Bamboo Forests and Their Effects on Yield

The annual cumulative NEP of the Moso bamboo forest ecosystem in 2024 reached 120 g C m⁻², indicating a weak carbon sink function for the year [46,47,48]. Within agroforestry production, NEP not only serves as an indicator of carbon sequestration capacity, but also as the material foundation determining bamboo biomass accumulation and economic shoot yield [17,49]. While the annual GPP reached 980 g C m⁻², demonstrating the superior carbon fixation potential of Moso bamboo as a high-efficiency plant, approximately 88% of photosynthates were consumed by Reco totaling 860 g C m⁻² [18]. This characteristic of high respiratory consumption and low net accumulation resulted in a carbon use efficiency of approximately 12%, which is significantly lower than levels reported for most agroforestry ecosystems, implying that the vast majority of organic matter produced in 2024 was utilized for metabolic maintenance, leaving only a minimal portion for conversion into culm dry matter or storage in the underground rhizome system [50]. The CUE of approximately 12% in 2024 was lower than the global average for forest ecosystems. This was primarily attributed to the high respiratory costs driven by a specific climatic event in 2024, combined with the high metabolic demands of the extensive Moso bamboo rhizome system [51].

The seasonal dynamics of carbon fluxes further revealed key windows and risk periods for yield formation, as GPP and NEP peaked between May and June, with daily GPP exceeding 15 g C m⁻² d⁻¹ during the phenological stage of branching and leaf expansion [52]. Nevertheless, the growth slope of cumulative NEP declined sharply or stagnated after August as air temperatures rose and soil moisture levels dropped (Figure 4b) [53]. Since the summer and autumn periods are critical for rhizome growth and shoot bud differentiation, insufficient carbon accumulation during this stage may lead to nutritional deficits in the underground system [54]. Consequently, although the Moso bamboo forest maintained a positive annual carbon sink, the high temperatures and water deficits during the late summer drought severely restricted the conversion efficiency of photosynthates into economic yield, suggesting that extensive management models relying solely on natural precipitation may fail to ensure synchronized improvements in carbon accumulation and economic output during extreme climatic years [55]. The findings of 2024 highlight the vulnerability of Moso bamboo to late summer heatwaves. An earlier onset of drought could lead to a decoupling of GPP and biomass accumulation more severely than observed in this study [56]. This study is limited to 2024 data due to past power constraints at our remote site. While this single-year focus limits the assessment of interannual variability, these results provide a high-resolution mechanistic snapshot of an extreme climatic year. Crucially, the modeling approach in this study was designed to elucidate biophysical driving mechanisms rather than to perform time-series forecasting. Under the constraints of a single-year dataset, a random data partitioning strategy was employed, as it allows for a more robust evaluation of the model’s ability to generalize these ecological mechanisms across the full range of observed environmental variability. This ensures that the model learns the response functions of NEP to environmental drivers without the biases potentially introduced by chronological splitting in a limited time series. Future research will utilize multi-year eddy covariance datasets to further validate these findings, while specifically incorporating seasonal dynamics to enhance predictive capabilities and long-term forecasting accuracy.

4.2. Nonlinear Regulation and Threshold Constraints of Environmental Factors

Environmental factors impacting ecosystem productivity often exhibit complex nonlinear characteristics, and identifying the turning points identified as thresholds is crucial for precision agricultural management [57,58]. Analysis based on the XGBoost model and SHAP values identified Rn as the primary driver of NEP variations in the Moso bamboo forest during 2024, with a significant positive promotion effect on productivity [59]. Dependence plots (Figure 7) showed a Rn influence threshold of 75.28 W m⁻², below which photosynthesis was limited and the carbon budget shifted toward a source, whereas NEP turned positive and increased with radiation once this threshold was surpassed [60]. From an agrometeorological perspective, light resources are the primary limiting factor for Moso bamboo yield, suggesting that stand density regulation should aim beyond ventilation to ensure sub-canopy radiation levels remain above the effective group scale threshold of 75.28 W m⁻² to maximize group light use efficiency [61].

In contrast to the positive drive of radiation, water-related factors exhibited unexpected negative threshold effects. The critical point for PPT was only 1.85 mm (Figure 7), beyond which the marginal effect on NEP became negative [62]. This threshold does not imply absolute inhibition by rainfall, but rather reflects the dominance of concomitant radiation attenuation under the regional climate, where precipitation events are associated with dense cloud cover and low sunshine hours, which drastically reduce photosynthetically active radiation [29]. Furthermore, the negative drive observed when the α exceeded 0.51 confirmed that excessive energy allocation to latent heat, namely evaporation rather than sensible heat, corresponds to high-humidity and low-radiation environments [63]. This implies, for subtropical bamboo management, that natural precipitation increases do not necessarily guarantee yield gains, as prolonged rainy periods significantly suppress dry matter accumulation due to light deficits [64].

Thermal conditions represent another critical dimension influencing respiratory consumption and net yield formation. This study found negative turning thresholds for Ta and Ts at 17.85 and 21.28 °C, respectively. These thresholds are significantly lower than the optimal temperature for Moso bamboo photosynthesis, reflecting a much higher sensitivity of respiration to temperature, particularly during the sustained 2024 summer heatwaves, which triggered exponential increases in ecosystem respiration and substantial thermal consumption [65]. From a crop physiological perspective, environmental temperatures consistently above 17.85 °C drive heat-induced maintenance respiration that consumes photosynthates and reduces carbohydrate reserves for culm growth and rhizome systems [66]. Consequently, in response to climate warming and extreme heat events, agricultural management must address the implicit carbon losses in yield formation by implementing physical cooling measures such as under-canopy spray irrigation to mitigate respiratory losses [67].

4.3. Impacts of Factor Interactions on Annual Yield

The productivity of the Moso bamboo forest ecosystem is not regulated by independent single factors, but instead results from the synergistic effects of multiple environmental variables, as shown by the dominance of interactions between Rn and PPT (Figure 8a), which provides a scientific basis for agricultural water management [68,69,70]. In practical management, the contribution of moisture to yield depends largely on the radiation background, where excessive rainfall, accompanied by low radiation, fails to translate into actual yield, whereas water supply becomes critical for maintaining high photosynthesis during periods of intense summer radiation [71]. Consequently, precise irrigation, based on the water light synergy effect by supplementing water under the premise of sufficient radiation, represents an effective pathway for enhancing the annual yield of Moso bamboo forests [72].

For factors whose interaction contributions exceed their main effects, such as VPD, LAI, and Ω, the management significance lies in optimizing microclimatic environments through structural adjustments [73]. These factors primarily function through coupling with other environmental variables (Figure 8b), where the extremely high interaction contribution of LAI implies that adjusting stand structure through reasonable thinning or pruning can alter light patterns and air circulation within the canopy, thereby alleviating the restrictions imposed by elevated VPD on stomatal conductance [74]. Such group regulation measures based on factor interaction characteristics are more effective in stabilizing the net yield increase rate of agroforestry systems compared to focusing solely on single moisture or temperature variables.

Regarding the extreme heat and late summer drought observed in August 2024, the stagnation of the cumulative NEP growth curve highlights the critical importance of summer management for yield stability [75,76]. Given the significant interaction between Ts and Ta, along with distinct negative driving thresholds, heat stress emerged as the core obstacle to yield in that year. In agricultural practice, warning mechanisms should be established based on the measured patterns of rapid precipitation decline and temperatures exceeding 17.85 °C in August. Implementing composite management measures such as mulching for moisture conservation or under-canopy spray irrigation can directly supplement water to mitigate the negative impacts of precipitation deficits while effectively regulating forest microclimates to offset the respiratory losses generated by high temperatures, thereby ensuring stable annual yields during years of climatic fluctuation [75,76,77].

This study advances the mechanistic understanding of subtropical bamboo forest carbon dynamics by employing an XGBoost framework to capture the nonlinear thresholds and synergetic interactions between NEP and environmental drivers like Rn, PPT, and alpha. These findings provide a theoretical baseline for evaluating ecosystem resilience under climatic extremes while offering practical evidence for optimizing forest management. By identifying specific environmental thresholds, this work supports more accurate carbon accounting and the development of sustainable irrigation and harvesting strategies to maintain bamboo forest carbon sinks in a warming world.

5. Conclusions

Based on continuous observations and modeling analyses of the Moso bamboo forest ecosystem in 2024, this study yields the following three core conclusions: Firstly, the Moso bamboo forest ecosystem functioned as a weak carbon sink in 2024 with an annual cumulative NEP of 120 g C m⁻². Influenced by respiratory losses as high as 860 g C m⁻², the carbon use efficiency reached only approximately 12.2%. The extreme late summer drought in August caused a near stagnation in net productivity accumulation, indicating that summer climatic extremes represent the core factor limiting annual biomass yield. Secondly, Rn served as the primary driver for productivity formation with a positive contribution threshold of 75.28 W m⁻². PPT exceeding 1.85 mm or Ta surpassing 17.85 °C both exerted significant negative driving effects on NEP. This confirms that radiation attenuation during rainy periods and respiration surges induced by high temperatures are the principal physiological causes restricting material accumulation in Moso bamboo. Thirdly, complex interactions among environmental factors significantly regulated yield formation. The interaction between Rn and PPT was the most prominent, confirming that the contribution of moisture to productivity is highly dependent on the radiation background. For factors such as VPD and LAI, interaction effect contributions exceeded their main effects. Specifically, these preliminary findings observed during the 2024 extreme weather events suggest that adaptive thinning could be explored as a potential strategy to maintain an optimal LAI, which may improve canopy ventilation and mitigate VPD-driven water stress under similar extreme conditions. Furthermore, based on the dominant RN-PPT interaction identified within this one-year study, management during events like the August heatwave could prioritize the testing of precision irrigation to alleviate the moisture-induced limitation on radiation use efficiency. These recommendations are proposed as hypotheses to be rigorously validated through future multi-year research. Implementing these concrete strategies to reduce respiratory losses and enhance photosynthetic efficiency is essential for ensuring the carbon sequestration and economic yield of subtropical Moso bamboo forests under climate extremes. While this study characterizes the response of NEP during the extreme climatic year of 2024, long-term continuous observations remain essential to fully summarize generalized ecological patterns. Collectively, this research provides a critical synthetic framework for understanding the sustainability and carbon sequestration resilience of subtropical bamboo ecosystems in the face of increasing climatic extremes.