Next Article in Journal
Excavation of Molecular Subtypes of Endometrial Cancer Based on DNA Methylation
Next Article in Special Issue
Mating Systems of Single Families and Population Genetic Diversity of Endangered Ormosia hosiei in South China
Previous Article in Journal
A Novel GCK Large Genomic Rearrangement in a Patient with MODY-2 Detected by Clinical Exome Sequencing
Previous Article in Special Issue
Climate-Driven Adaptive Differentiation in Melia azedarach: Evidence from a Common Garden Experiment
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Genes
Volume 13
Issue 11
10.3390/genes13112105
genes-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Inbreeding in Chinese Fir: Insight into the Rare Self-Fertilizing Event from a Genetic View

by
Rong Huang
1,†,
Weishan Zeng
1,2,†,
Houyin Deng
1,
Dehuo Hu
1,
Runhui Wang
1 and
Huiquan Zheng
1,*
1
Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Silviculture, Protection and Utilization, Guangdong Academy of Forestry, Guangzhou 510520, China
2
College of Forestry and Landscape Architecture, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Genes 2022, 13(11), 2105; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes13112105
Submission received: 16 September 2022 / Revised: 11 November 2022 / Accepted: 11 November 2022 / Published: 13 November 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Molecular Mechanisms of Adaptive Evolution in Trees)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Chinese fir (Cunninghamia lanceolata (Lamb.) Hook.) is a fast-growing conifer with great forestation value and prefers outcrossing with high inbreeding depression effect. Previously, we captured a special Chinese fir parent clone named as ‘cx569’ that lacks early inbreeding depression. In view of the fact that very little has been published about the rare self-fertilizing event in Chinese fir from a genetic view, herein, we conduct an SSR-based study on the variation of open- and self-pollinated offspring of this parent to gain a view of the rare self-fertilizing event. The results indicated that genetic diversity of self-pollinated offspring was significantly reduced by half (Ho: 0.302, vs. 0.595, p = 0.001; He: 0.274 vs. 0.512, p = 0.002) when compared to an open-pollinated set. Self-pollinated offspring also had significantly positive FIS values (FIS = 0.057, p = 0.034) with a much higher proportion of common allele (20.59% vs. 0), reflecting their heterozygote deficiency. Clustering analysis further indicated a separation of the self- and opened- pollinated groups, implying a natural preference of outcrossing for cx569. However, the cx569 still had 6% acceptance for selfing. When accepted 100% for its own pollen, the cx569 led to a genetically unique selfing group. Additionally, this selfing group seemed to be consistently homozygous at seven particular loci. These findings gave us more genetic clues to gain insight into the rare self-fertilizing event in conifer (Chinese fir).

1. Introduction

The reproduction mode of plants determines, to a great extent, their genetic properties and the efficacy of natural selection, and thus potential for adaptive evolution [1,2]. The genetic and ecological consequences of mating systems have long been the subject of considerable concern in evolutionary biology. Selfing, where male and female gametes arise from the same parent, is one of the reproduction modes in seed plants [3,4]. It is considered to have short-term ecological and genetic benefits, including reproductive assurance and inherent transmission advantage [5,6,7]. Nonetheless, selfing inevitably has negative effects, such as pollen discounting and specifically inbreeding depression [8,9]. Thus, plants generate numerous mechanisms (e.g., self-incompatibility, herkogamy dichogamy and dioecy) to prevent selfing and to promote outcrossing, potentially avoiding the negative consequences of selfing [4].
The morphological traits that are expected to influence mating systems are known to be highly dynamic, varying widely among populations or individuals, and have been well documented in some species, such as Arabidopsis lyrata [10,11], Arenaria uniflora [12], the Leavenworthia species [13,14,15] and Eichhornia Paniculata [16]. The most frequent evolutionary shift of mating systems is the transition from outcrossing to selfing across the plant kingdom [4,17,18]. From the perspective of genetic consequences, selfing is expected to show reduced effective recombination rates and increased homozygosity, resulting in decreasing genetic diversity relative to outcrossing [19,20]. Given the important effects of mating systems on plant genetic properties, it is of considerable interest to assess the genetic consequences of mating system transition [2,21,22,23]. Up to the current date, the effect of the mating system on genetic properties have focused on angiosperms, however, coniferous trees have received much less attention.
C. lanceolata belongs to Cupressaceae, with a common name as Chinese fir, and is a fast-growing coniferous tree with great forestation value [24]. It is naturally widespread from the central to the southeastern zones of China, and has been indicated for cultivation in many countries around the world, such as Vietnam, Brazil, New Zealand, Australia and Canada [25,26,27]. C. lanceolata is a monoecious species, which produces pollen and ovulate cones in different structures within the same individual (Figure 1). The ovulate cones are distributed in the middle to upper crown, while pollen cones are in the middle to lower crown in a single individual [28,29,30]. Generally, ovulate cones sexually mature earlier than pollen cones within the same plant of C. lanceolata [31]. Temporal or spatial separation of ovulate and pollen cones are likely to serve as an effective mechanism to encourage outcrossing and prevent selfing in C. lanceolata [28,29]. Given this, C. lanceolata is generally regarded as an outcrossing species. Previous studies indicate that self-fertilization gives rise to significant inbreeding depression in C. lanceolata, reducing different components of fitness, e.g., seed yield, germination rate and seedling growth [32,33,34]. High inbreeding depression may play a central role to prevent the evolution of self-fertilization in the species [32,33]. Our fieldwork and previous studies [29,31] have shown that the overlapping degree of pollen and ovulate cone maturation vary widely among individuals in C. lanceolata. Synchronism in pollen and ovulate cone maturation was discovered in a special Chinese fir parent clone, named as ‘cx569’ (Figure 1), providing the opportunity for self-fertilization. More interestingly, the comparation of self- and open-pollinated seedling growth in our previous study showed an absence of early inbreeding depression in cx569 [34]. However, very little has been published about the rare self-fertilizing event in the conifer (Chinese fir) from a genetic view. Simple sequence repeats (SSRs) are extensively and successfully employed in population genetic studies because they are co-dominant, multi-allelic, highly polymorphic and reproducible [35,36,37]. Here, we conduct a comparative study on the genetic properties of self- and open-pollinated offspring of cx569 using 20 SSR markers. The aim of the present study was to reveal the effect of the self-fertilizing event on genetic diversity and structure in Chinese fir.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Plant Material and DNA Extraction

The unpollinated ovulate cones of cx569 were bagged, and pollinated with self-pollen in a 2.5th generation seed orchard of Chinese fir that locates in the Xiaokeng State Forest Farm (Guangdong Province, China; N24°70′, E113°81′, alt. 328–339 m) in February 2018. The mature self-pollinated seeds were then collected in November. Simultaneously, open-pollinated seeds of the cx569 were also collected. All seeds were germinated on filtered water and grown in peat soil mixed with 20% expanded-perlite. Then, 200 seedlings of self- and open-pollination were collected randomly for DNA extraction, respectively.
Total genomic DNA was extracted from the fresh and health leaves with a DNAsecure Plant Kit (TIANGEN, Beijing, China). The DNA purity and concentration were evaluated using 1% agarose gel electrophoresis and a NanoDrop-2000 Spectrophotometer (Wilmington, DE, USA).

2.2. SSR Genotyping

The quality of markers and the accuracy of the genotyping data significantly influence the effectiveness and success of SSR. In this study, 20 polymorphic SSR markers, except for SSR6, previously developed were used in this study [38,39]. Attributes of the 20 SSR primer pairs are shown in Table S1. The polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was conducted in a total volume of 25 µL consisting of 0.5 µL DNA (~50 ng), 0.5 µL forward primer (10 µmol/L), 0.5 µL reverse primer (10 µmol/L), 12.5 µL 2 × Taq Plus PCR MasterMix (TIANGEN, Beijing, China), and 11 µL double distilled water. The PCR program was as follows: initial denaturation at 94 °C for 5 min, followed by 35 cycles at 94 °C for 30 s, 55 °C for 30 s, 72 °C for 30 s and final extension at 72 °C for 10 min. Capillary electrophoresis with fluorescence-labeled SSR marker is a common method that heralded accurate and consistent allele sizing with a high degree of automation and throughput [35,36,37]. Here, the forward primers were labeled with one of the fluorescent dyes ROX, FAM, or HEX at the 5′ end in the polymerase chain reaction assay. The PCR products were then subjected to capillary electrophoresis using an ABI3730xl DNA Analyzer (Applied Biosystems, Carlsbad, CA, USA). Genotypes were determined with Gene-Marker 2.2.0 software (SoftGenetics LLC, State College, PA, USA).

2.3. Data Analysis

To evaluate the genetic diversity, the number of alleles (Na), the Shannon’s information index (I), the observed heterozygosity (Ho), the expected heterozygosity (He) were analyzed with the GenAlEx 6.5 [40]. Then, an independent t-test was used to test whether genetic parameters of self-pollinated offspring were statistically lower than those of open-pollinated group in SPSS Statistics 23 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Allele frequency was also estimated in GenAlEx 6.5.
Three different approaches were used to assess genetic relationship among offspring. Firstly, a Bayesian model-based cluster analysis was implemented with STRUCTURE v2.3.4 [41] to assign individuals to K genetic clusters. Five independent runs for K values ranging from 1 to 10 were conducted under the admixture model with 100,000 burn-in iterations followed by 1,000,000 iterations for Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC). The appropriate K value was determined according to the method of Evanno et al. using Structure Harvester program [42]. The software CLUMPP [43] was used to merge the results of multiple iterations of the corresponding K values. Secondly, Power Marker version 3.25 [44] was used to calculate pairwise Nei’s (1983) DA distance between individuals and generate a genetic distances matrix. The genetic distances matrix was then used as input for clustering analysis by the unweighted pair-group method of averages (UPGMA) and neighbor-joining algorithm (NJ) to generate dendrograms in Power Marker, respectively. MEGA 7.0 [45] was employed to plot and edit the dendrogram. Thirdly, Principal Coordinate Analysis (PCoA) was conducted to visualize the genetic relationship among individuals using GenAlEx 6.5.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Polymorphism Analysis of SSR Markers

The lack of genetic variability and narrow genetic base have significantly harmed the discrimination ability of molecular markers in inbred lines [46]. Thus, the development of specific molecular markers with high-resolution is critical to the accurate and rapid discrimination of inbred lines. In this study, SSR profiles for 20 loci are presented in Table S2. Among the 20 markers tested, 13 (65%) and 20 (100%) were polymorphic in self- and open-pollinated offspring, respectively (Table 1). A total of 33 and 132 alleles were observed across the 20 markers in self- and open-pollinated offspring, respectively. The number of alleles produced by each primer pair varied from one to two with an average of 1.7 ± 0.5 in self-pollinated offspring, while three to 14 with an average of 6.6 ± 3.3 in open-pollinated offspring. SSR1 and SSR11 had the largest number of alleles (Table 1, Figures S1 and S2). The observed heterozygosity (Ho) ranged among loci from 0 to 0.714 and from 0.065 to 0.930 in self- and open-pollinated offspring, respectively, while the expected heterozygosity (He) ranged from 0 to 0.500 and from 0.064 to 0.798 (Table 1). Among the 20 loci, SSR1 had the highest genetic diversity, while SSR12 harbored the lowest diversity. Most notably, some of the markers including SSR1, SSR2, SSR5, SSR7, SSR11, SSR13, SSR15, SSR17, SSR18, SSR20, SSR21, not only showed high values of genetic parameter in open-pollinated offspring, but also had moderate values in complete selfing offspring (Table 1). Similar to our findings, Duan et al. [47] investigated genetic diversity in 149 Chinese fir using the same 20 SSR markers and found these markers with high Ho, He and I values. Having high genetic parameter values for a marker is a vital indicator that the marker can be successfully used for closely related species/cultivars authentication [48]. Therefore, we propose that these loci can serve as high-resolution makers in estimation of genetic diversity and identification of inbred lines of Chinese fir.

3.2. Genetic Diversity of Self- and Open-Pollinated Offspring

Compared with outcrossing, selfing is expected to show reduction of genetic diversity [49,50,51]. In this study, the average values of observed heterozygosity (Ho: 0.302 ± 0.281 vs. 0.595 ± 0.234, p = 0.001), expected heterozygosity (He: 0.274 ± 0.242 vs. 0.512 ± 0.198, p = 0.002) and Shannon’s index (I: 0.384 ± 0.334 vs. 1.003 ± 0.470, p = 0.000) for self-pollinated offspring were significantly lower than those for open-pollinated offspring (Table 1). As theory prediction [19,20], complete selfing results in a reduction of 50% genetic diversity when comparing to open-pollinated offspring in Chinese fir. The reason behind this reduction is that selfing may decrease recombination rates, leading to increased homozygosity and thus reduction of diversity [52,53,54]. Such is the case, which can be draw from the differences in fixation index (FIS) and allele frequency distribution patterns between the two types of offspring. Positive FIS value indicates a deficit of heterozygote, while negative FIS value suggests heterozygote excess [55]. Here, the self-pollinated offspring had positive FIS values (FIS = 0.057) (Table 1), suggesting their heterozygote deficiency. On the contrary, the open-pollinated offspring showed negative FIS values (FIS = −0.159) (Table 1), indicating they presented an excess of heterozygotes. Moreover, they displayed different distribution patterns of allele frequency as illustrated in Figure 2. For self-pollinated offspring, medium-to-high gene frequency allele (0.5 < gene frequency < 1) accounted for the highest proportion (44.12%), followed by low-to-medium frequency allele (0.5 < gene frequency ≤ 0.5) (29.41%) and common allele (allele frequency = 1) (20.59%). Rare allele (allele frequency ≤ 0.05) accounted for a very low proportion (5.88%). Conversely, rare allele accounted for the highest proportion (53.03%), while common allele (allele frequency = 100%) was absent in open-pollinated offspring. These results suggest that the self-pollinated offspring become more or completely homozygous for most alleles (67.41%) relative to the open-pollinated set, thus resulting in decrease of genetic diversity.

3.3. Genetic Structure and Mating System in Clone cx569 of Chinese Fir

Bayesian genetic cluster analysis implemented in STRUCTURE showed that, with K = 2, delta K and log likelihood reached a maximum and minimum value, respectively (Figure 3A,B). All the self-pollinated offspring were assigned to the same genetic cluster, while most open-pollinated offspring were assigned to a second genetic cluster (Figure 3C). The UPGMA dendrogram (Figure 4A) was broadly consistent with the unrooted neighbor-joining (NJ) tree (Figure 4B). The 400 offspring were grouped into two clusters comprising all individuals of self-pollinated offspring and most open-pollinated offspring, respectively (Figure 4). PCoA (Figure 5), an alternative mean of detecting and visualizing the genetic structure, revealed a pattern that was also broadly in line with the partitioning results of the STRUCTURE analysis, UPGMA dendrogram and the NJ tree, that is, self- and open-pollinated offspring were clustered as two genetic groups. Moreover, many alleles that were found in open-pollinated offspring were absent in self-pollinated offspring. For example, only two alleles of SSR1 with size of 336 bp and 350 bp were observed in self-pollinated offspring, while additional twelve alleles were found in open-pollinated offspring (Figure S1). Similarly, SSR11 produced 14 alleles with size ranged from 335 bp to 375 bp in open-pollinated offspring, however, only two of those alleles were detected in self-pollinated offspring (Figure S2). The results indicated that many new alleles were introduced from other parents into offspring of cx569 by inter-individual mating. Overall, these findings suggested a natural preference of outcrossing for cx569.
The mating system of the coniferous trees are characterized as predominantly (~90%) outcrossing [56], especially the species that is temporal asynchrony between pollen release and ovulate cone opening (e.g., Pinus roxburghii [57]). On the contrary, synchronization in mature male and female cones lead to selfing in some conifers [58,59]. To our knowledge, there is few literatures about the self-fertilizing event in Chinese fir. In this study, ‘cx569’ shows the overlapping of pollen and ovulate cone maturation, which may lead to self-fertilization. To reveal the self-fertilization event in Chinese fir from a genetic view, genetic relationships between individuals of the self- and open-offspring were analysis. STRUCTURE analysis showed that 13 individuals (1, 6, 9, 10, 13, 16, 18, 19, 24, 28, 29, 38, 193) of open-pollinated offspring were grouped with the self-pollinated ones (Figure 3C). Similarly, 13 open-pollinated offspring (1, 9, 10, 13, 16, 18, 19, 24, 28, 29, 38, 193, 195) were clustered together with self-pollinated offspring in the UPGMA tree (Figure 4A), while an additional six individuals (6, 36, 66, 70, 92, 165) were clustered together with a self-pollinated group in the NJ tree (Figure 4B). The PCoA broadly confirmed the results of the above three analyses, that is, 13 open-pollinated offspring (1, 9, 10, 13, 16, 18, 19, 24, 28, 29, 38, 193, 195) were grouped into a self-pollinated group (Figure 5). These results suggest that the 12 open-pollinated offspring clustered together with self-pollinated offspring in the four clustering results were likely the progenies that were produced by natural self-pollination. The finding suggests that cx569 is predominantly (94%) outcrossing in open-pollinated environment, however, it still had 6% acceptance for selfing.
At the genetic level, a selfing organism is more likely to rapidly create homozygotes from recessive favorable mutations than outcrossers, increasing the overall selection acting on them [19,21,60]. In the complete selfing group, only one genotype was observed at 7 loci, i.e., SSR3, SSR4, SSR8, SSR10, SSR12, SSR14 and SSR19, while three or two genotypes were detected at the remainder of loci (Figure 6). This result indicated that the selfing group seemed to be consistently homozygous at the seven loci. Theoretical studies have predicted that selfing can purge the deleterious recessive mutations and fix recessive favorable mutations, and thus rapidly evolve unless it is counteracted by sufficiently high inbreeding depression [19,21,60]. Considering the lack of early inbreeding depression in cx569, we speculate that these homozygous loci may be the beneficial types that are fixed in the offspring by selfing.

4. Conclusions

In the present study, our results revealed that the genetic diversity of self-pollinated offspring was significantly reduced by half relative to the open-pollinated group. Moreover, they also showed significantly positive FIS values and a much higher proportion of common allele, suggesting their heterozygote deficiency. The clustering analysis showed that 12 open-pollinated offspring clustered together with self-pollinated offspring were likely the progenies that were produced by self-pollination. The results indicated that cx569 naturally prefer cross-fertilization with an outcrossing rate of 94%, however, it still had 6% acceptance for selfing. When being complete selfing, they were likely to be consistently homozygous at some particular loci (i.e., SSR3, SSR4, SSR8, SSR10, SSR12, SSR14 and SSR19) that is likely the beneficial types. The present study advances our understanding of the rare self-fertilizing event in the conifer (Chinese fir).

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/genes13112105/s1, Figure S1: The fingerprint profiles of self- and open-offspring generated by primer SSR1. The fluorescence strength was shown in the Y-axis and DNA fragment sizes in base pairs was shown in the X-axis. The allele detected both in self- and open-pollinated offspring was represented by black box; Figure S2: The fingerprint profiles of self- and open-offspring generated by primer SSR11. The fluorescence strength was shown in the Y-axis and DNA fragment sizes in base pairs was shown in the X-axis. The allele detected both in self- and open-pollinated offspring was represented by black box; Table S1: Attributes of 20 microsatellite loci in this study; Table S2: Microsatellite profiles for 20 SSR loci for 400 offspring.

Author Contributions

H.Z. concept and design; H.Z., H.D., R.W. and D.H. resources; H.Z., H.D., R.W. and D.H. materials; H.Z. and W.Z. collection and/or processing; W.Z. data validation; R.H., W.Z. and H.Z. analysis and/or interpretation; R.H. and H.Z. literature search; R.H. and W.Z. writing-original draft; H.Z. project administration and funding acquisition. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 31972956) and the Key-Area Research and Development Program of Guangdong Province (No. 2020B020215001).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest, and the funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Eckert, C.G.; Kalisz, S.; Geber, M.A.; Sargent, R.; Elle, E.; Cheptou, P.O.; Goodwillie, C.; Johnston, M.O.; Kelly, J.K.; Moeller, D.A.; et al. Plant mating systems in a changing world. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2010, 25, 35–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Burgarella, C.; Gayral, P.; Ballenghien, M.; Bernard, A.; David, P.; Jarne, P.; Correa, A.; Hurtrez-Bousses, S.; Escobar, J.; Galtier, N.; et al. Molecular evolution of freshwater snails with contrasting mating systems. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2015, 32, 2403–2416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Vogler, D.W.; Kalisz, S. Sex among the flowers: The distribution of plant mating systems. Evolution 2001, 55, 202–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Igic, B.; Busch, J.W. Is self-fertilization an evolutionary dead end? New Phytol. 2013, 198, 386–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Baker, H.G. Self-compatibility and establishment after “long-distance” dispersal. Evolution 1955, 9, 347–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Kalisz, S.; Vogler, D.W.; Hanley, K.M. Context-dependent autonomous self-fertilization yields reproductive assurance and mixed mating. Nature 2004, 430, 884–887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Charlesworth, D. Evolution of plant breeding systems. Curr. Biol. 2006, 16, R726–R735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Frankham, R.; Ballou, J.; Briscoe, D.; McInnes, K. Introduction to Conservation Genetics; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  9. Naito, Y.; Konuma, A.; Iwata, H.; Suyama, Y.; Seiwa, K.; Okuda, T.; Lee, S.L.; Muhammad, N.; Tsumura, Y. Selfing and inbreeding depression in seeds and seedlings of Neobalanocarpus heimii (Dipterocarpaceae). J. Plant Res. 2005, 118, 423–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Mable, B.K.; Adam, A. Patterns of genetic diversity in outcrossing and selfing populations of Arabidopsis lyrata. Mol. Ecol. 2007, 16, 3565–3580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Foxe, J.P.; Stift, M.; Tedder, A.; Haudry, A.; Wright, S.I.; Mable, B.K. Reconstructing origins of loss of self-incompatibility and selfing in North American Arabidopsis lyrata: A population genetic context. Evolution 2010, 64, 3495–3510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Fishman, L. Inbreeding depression in two populations of Arenaria uniflora (Caryophyllaceae) with contrasting mating systems. Heredity 2001, 86, 184–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Lyons, E.E.; Antonovics, J. Breeding system evolution in Leavenworthia: Breeding system variation and reproductive success in natural populations of Leavenworthia crassa (Cruciferae). Am. J. Bot. 1991, 78, 270–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Busch, J.W. Inbreeding depression in self-incompatible and self-compatible populations of Leavenworthia alabamica. Heredity 2005, 94, 159–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Baldwin, S.J.; Schoen, D.J. Genetic variation for pseudo-self-compatibility in self-incompatible populations of Leavenworthia alabamica (Brassicaceae). New Phytol. 2017, 213, 430–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Ness, R.W.; Wright, S.I.; Barrett, S.C.H. Mating-system variation, demographic history and patterns of nucleotide diversity in the tristylous plant Eichhornia paniculata. Genetics 2010, 184, 381–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Igic, B.; Lande, R.; Kohn, J.R. Loss of self-incompatibility and its evolutionary consequences. Int. J. Plant Sci. 2008, 169, 93–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Jimenez-Lobato, V.; Nunez-Farfan, J. Mating system of Datura inoxia: Association between selfing rates and herkogamy within populations. PeerJ 2021, 9, e10698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Pollak, E. On the theory of partially inbreeding finite populations. I. Partial selfing. Genetics 1987, 117, 353–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Nordborg, M. Linkage disequilibrium, gene trees and selfing: An ancestral recombination graph with partial self-fertilization. Genetics 2000, 154, 923–929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Charlesworth, B. Evolutionary rates in partially self-fertilizing species. Am. Nat. 1992, 140, 126–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Sicard, A.; Lenhard, M. The selfing syndrome: A model for studying the genetic and evolutionary basis of morphological adaptation in plants. Ann. Bot. 2011, 107, 1433–1443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Wozniak, N.J.; Kappel, C.; Marona, C.; Altschmied, L.; Neuffer, B.; Sicard, A. A similar genetic architecture underlies the convergent evolution of the selfing syndrome in Capsella. Plant Cell 2020, 32, 935–949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Yang, Y.; Ferguson, D.K.; Liu, B.; Mao, K.S.; Gao, L.M.; Zhang, S.Z.; Wan, T.; Rushforth, K.; Zhang, Z.X. Recent advances on phylogenomics of gymnosperms and a new classification. Plant Divers. 2022, 44, 340–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Fung, L.E. Wood properties of New Zealand-grown Cunninghamia lanceolata. N. Z. J. For. Sci. 1993, 23, 324–338. [Google Scholar]
  26. Tran, B.D.; Le, T.N.H. A review of Cunninghamia lanceolata (Lamb.) Hook: A recent update and potential application in Vietnam. Vietnam. J. Agric. Sci. 2020, 3, 892–902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Dobner, M., Jr.; Trazzi, P.A.; Machado, S.D.A.; Higa, A.R. Aspectos dendrométricos e silviculturais de um povoamento de Cunninghamia lanceolata no sul do Brasil. Floresta 2017, 47, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Zhouwen, Z. Differences in flowering characteristic among clones of Cunninghamia lanceolata (LAMB.) hook. Silvae. Genet. 2002, 51, 206–210. [Google Scholar]
  29. Wang, R.H.; Hu, D.H.; Zheng, H.Q.; Liu, W.X.; Liang, R.Y.; Yang, B.Q. Genetic variation analysis of flowering phenology in the 2.5 generation seed orchard of Cunninghamia lanceolata. J. Southwest For. Univ. (Nat. Sci.) 2013, 33, 25–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Du, Z.; Deng, Y.W.; Zhang, F.; Zhang, M.; Chen, J.P.; Guo, J.H.; Li, Q.; Qin, L.P. Phenophase observation and analysis of Cunninghamia lanceolata seed orchard in northern Guangxi. Mod. Agric. Sci. Technol. 2019, 7, 118–120. [Google Scholar]
  31. Zhang, Z.W. Studies on Chinese Fir Reproduction Characteristics. Ph.D. Thesis, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, China, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  32. Wang, Z.M.; Chen, Y.T. An analysis on the combining ability of main growth character in Chinese fir and the application of its heterosis. For. Res. 1988, 1, 614–624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Chen, Y.T.; He, G.P.; Li, G.X. The effect of inbreeding on seed germination and seedling height growth of Chinese fir. For. Res. 1989, 2, 420–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Deng, H.; Hu, D.; Wei, R.; Yan, S.; Wang, R.; Zheng, H. Global transcriptome analysis reveals genes associated with seedling advance growth traits in a selfed family of Chinese fir (Cunninghamia lanceolata). Dendrobiology 2022, 87, 27–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Vemireddy, L.R.; Archak, S.; Nagaraju, J. Capillary electrophoresis is essential for microsatellite marker based detection and quantification of adulteration of basmati rice (Oryza sativa). J. Agric. Food Chem. 2007, 55, 8112–8117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Ali, A.; Wang, J.D.; Pan, Y.B.; Deng, Z.H.; Chen, Z.W.; Chen, R.K.; Gao, S.J. Molecular identification and genetic diversity analysis of Chinese Sugarcane (Saccharum spp. Hybrids) varieties using SSR markers. Trop. Plant Biol. 2017, 10, 194–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Zhao, Y.N.; Wang, Y.; Wang, L.X.; Zhang, D.J. Molecular identification of mung bean accessions (Vigna radiata L.) from Northeast China using capillary electrophoresis with fluorescence-labeled SSR markers. Food Energy Secur. 2020, 9, e182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Wen, Y.; Ueno, S.; Han, W.; Tsumura, Y. Development and characterization of 28 polymorphic EST-SSR markers for Cunninghamia lanceolata (Taxodiaceae) based on transcriptome sequences. Silvae. Genet. 2013, 62, 137–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Duan, H.J.; Hu, R.Y.; Wu, B.; Chen, D.X.; Huang, K.Y.; Dai, J.; Chen, Q.; Wei, Z.C.; Cao, S.; Sun, Y.H.; et al. Genetic characterization of red-colored heartwood genotypes of Chinese fir using simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers. Genet. Mol. Res. GMR 2015, 14, 18552–18561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Peakall, R.; Smouse, P.E. GENALEX 6: Genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research. Mol. Ecol. Notes 2006, 6, 288–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Pritchard, J.K.; Stephens, M.; Rosenberg, N.A.; Donnelly, P. Association mapping in structured populations. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2000, 67, 170–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Earl, D.A.; Vonholdt, B.M. STRUCTURE HARVESTER: A website and program for visualizing STRUCTURE output and implementing the Evanno method. Conserv. Genet. Resour. 2012, 4, 359–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Jakobsson, M.; Rosenberg, N.A. CLUMPP: A cluster matching and permutation program for dealing with label switching and multimodality in analysis of population structure. Bioinformatics 2007, 23, 1801–1806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Liu, K.J.; Muse, S.V. PowerMarker: An integrated analysis environment for genetic marker analysis. Bioinformatics 2005, 21, 2128–2129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Kumar, S.; Stecher, G.; Tamura, K. MEGA7: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2016, 33, 1870–1874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Musundire, L.; Derera, J.; Dari, S.; Tongoona, P.; Cairns, J.E. Molecular characterisation of maize introgressed inbred lines bred in different environments. Euphytica 2019, 215, 46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Duan, H.J.; Hu, D.H.; Li, Y.; Zheng, H.Q. Characterization of a collection of Chinese fir elite genotypes using sequence-related amplified polymorphism markers. J. For. Res. 2016, 27, 1105–1110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Zhong, Y.M.; Cheng, Y.; Ruan, M.Y.; Ye, Q.J.; Wang, R.Q.; Yao, Z.P.; Zhou, G.Z.; Liu, J.; Yu, J.H.; Wan, H.J. High-throughput SSR marker development and the analysis of genetic diversity in Capsicum frutescens. Horticulturae 2021, 7, 187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Reisch, C.; Bernhardt-Romermann, M. The impact of study design and life history traits on genetic variation of plants determined with AFLPs. Plant Ecol. 2014, 215, 1493–1511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Pettengill, J.B.; Runquist, R.D.B.; Moeller, D.A. Mating system divergence affects the distribution of sequence diversity within and among populations of recently diverged subspecies of Clarkia xantiana (Onagraceae). Am. J. Bot. 2016, 103, 99–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Lopez-Villalobos, A.; Eckert, C.G. Consequences of multiple mating-system shifts for population and range-wide genetic structure in a coastal dune plant. Mol. Ecol. 2018, 27, 675–693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Glemin, S.; Bazin, E.; Charlesworth, D. Impact of mating systems on patterns of sequence polymorphism in flowering plants. Proc. R. Soc. B Boil. Sci. 2006, 273, 3011–3019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Aguilar, R.; Quesada, M.; Ashworth, L.; Herrerias-Diego, Y.; Lobo, J. Genetic consequences of habitat fragmentation in plant populations: Susceptible signals in plant traits and methodological approaches. Mol. Ecol. 2008, 17, 5177–5188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Ohbayashi, K.; Hodoki, Y.; Kondo, N.I.; Kunii, H.; Shimada, M. A massive tsunami promoted gene flow and increased genetic diversity in a near threatened plant species. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 10933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Stoeckel, S.; Grange, J.; Fernandez-Manjarres, J.F.; Bilger, I.; Frascaria-Lacoste, N.; Mariette, S. Heterozygote excess in a self-incompatible and partially clonal forest tree species—Prunus avium L. Mol. Ecol. 2006, 15, 2109–2118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Pandey, M.; Rajora, O.P. Higher fine-scale genetic structure in peripheral than in core populations of a long-lived and mixed-mating conifer—Eastern white cedar (Thuja occidentalis L.). BMC Evol. Biol. 2012, 12, 48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  57. Sharma, C.M.; Khanduri, V.P.; Ghildiyal, S.K. Reproductive ecology of male and female strobili and mating system in two different populations of Pinus roxburghii. Sci. World J. 2012, 2012, 271389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Mitton, J.B. The dynamic mating systems of conifers. New For. 1992, 6, 197–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. O’Connell, L.M.; Russell, J.; Ritland, K. Fine-scale estimation of outcrossing in western redcedar with microsatellite assay of bulked DNA. Heredity 2004, 93, 443–449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Caballero, A.; Hill, W.G. Effects of partial inbreeding on fixation rates and variation of mutant genes. Genetics 1992, 131, 493–507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Genes 13 02105 g001 550
Figure 1. Synchronization in mature of ovulate and pollen cones in clone cx569 of Chinese fir.
Figure 1. Synchronization in mature of ovulate and pollen cones in clone cx569 of Chinese fir.
Genes 13 02105 g001
Genes 13 02105 g002 550
Figure 2. Allele frequency distributions across 20 loci for self- and open-pollinated offspring.
Figure 2. Allele frequency distributions across 20 loci for self- and open-pollinated offspring.
Genes 13 02105 g002
Genes 13 02105 g003 550
Figure 3. Bayesian clustering results of the STRUCTURE analysis for self- and open-pollinated offspring. (A) Estimates of ΔK with respect to K; (B) plot of the probability of the data (LnP(D)) values; (C) genetic group structure with K = 2, different colors represent different genetic pools.
Figure 3. Bayesian clustering results of the STRUCTURE analysis for self- and open-pollinated offspring. (A) Estimates of ΔK with respect to K; (B) plot of the probability of the data (LnP(D)) values; (C) genetic group structure with K = 2, different colors represent different genetic pools.
Genes 13 02105 g003
Genes 13 02105 g004 550
Figure 4. UPGMA dendrogram (A) and unrooted neighbor-joining (B) trees based on Nei’s (1983) DA distance of self- and open-pollinated offspring. Red lines represent self-pollinated offspring, and blue lines represent open-pollinated offspring.
Figure 4. UPGMA dendrogram (A) and unrooted neighbor-joining (B) trees based on Nei’s (1983) DA distance of self- and open-pollinated offspring. Red lines represent self-pollinated offspring, and blue lines represent open-pollinated offspring.
Genes 13 02105 g004
Genes 13 02105 g005 550
Figure 5. Scatterplot of the principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) for self- and open-pollinated offspring. Different colors represent individuals of self- and open-pollinated offspring.
Figure 5. Scatterplot of the principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) for self- and open-pollinated offspring. Different colors represent individuals of self- and open-pollinated offspring.
Genes 13 02105 g005
Genes 13 02105 g006 550
Figure 6. The frequency of genotype across the 20 SSR loci in the self-pollinated offspring. Individual number of a certain genotype was shown in the Y-axis and genotype of SSR loci was show in the X-axis.
Figure 6. The frequency of genotype across the 20 SSR loci in the self-pollinated offspring. Individual number of a certain genotype was shown in the Y-axis and genotype of SSR loci was show in the X-axis.
Genes 13 02105 g006
Table
Table 1. Genetic diversity across 20 SSR loci for self- and open-pollinated offspring in clone cx569 of Chinese fir.
Table 1. Genetic diversity across 20 SSR loci for self- and open-pollinated offspring in clone cx569 of Chinese fir.
LocusSelf-Pollinated Offspring (n = 200)Open-Pollinated Offspring (n = 200)
NaHoHeIFISNaHoHeIFIS
SSR120.6100.4960.689−0.230140.8650.7981.936−0.083
SSR220.5250.4970.690−0.056120.6900.7511.7090.082
SSR31000-50.3000.2830.588−0.060
SSR41000-70.7750.5671.064−0.366
SSR520.4950.5000.6930.01080.9300.7371.457−0.263
SSR720.5600.4960.689−0.12950.5700.6141.0850.072
SSR81000-40.1950.1930.414−0.009
SSR9200.0490.1171.00060.5000.4210.844−0.187
SSR101000-70.8550.5681.004−0.505
SSR1120.5100.5000.693−0.020140.8850.7781.755−0.137
SSR121000-50.0650.0640.181−0.023
SSR1320.5600.4980.691−0.12440.5450.5180.793−0.053
SSR141000-70.5650.4580.905−0.235
SSR1520.6200.5000.693−0.24150.6600.5861.056−0.125
SSR16200.0100.0311.00050.4400.3750.773−0.174
SSR1720.5600.5000.693−0.12030.4350.3690.568−0.180
SSR1820.5500.4980.691−0.10450.6450.5941.016−0.086
SSR191000-30.3850.3290.563−0.169
SSR2020.7140.4720.665−0.51130.7700.4800.686-0.604
SSR2120.3350.4590.6520.271100.8150.7531.672−0.083
Mean1.70.3020.2740.3840.0576.60.5950.5121.003−0.159
SD0.50.2810.2420.3340.4353.30.2340.1980.4700.169
Na, the number of alleles; Ho, the observed heterozygosity; He, the expected heterozygosity; I, the Shannon’s information index; FIS, fixation index; SD, standard error of the mean.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Huang, R.; Zeng, W.; Deng, H.; Hu, D.; Wang, R.; Zheng, H. Inbreeding in Chinese Fir: Insight into the Rare Self-Fertilizing Event from a Genetic View. Genes 2022, 13, 2105. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes13112105

AMA Style

Huang R, Zeng W, Deng H, Hu D, Wang R, Zheng H. Inbreeding in Chinese Fir: Insight into the Rare Self-Fertilizing Event from a Genetic View. Genes. 2022; 13(11):2105. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes13112105

Chicago/Turabian Style

Huang, Rong, Weishan Zeng, Houyin Deng, Dehuo Hu, Runhui Wang, and Huiquan Zheng. 2022. "Inbreeding in Chinese Fir: Insight into the Rare Self-Fertilizing Event from a Genetic View" Genes 13, no. 11: 2105. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes13112105

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop