Next Article in Journal
Catalysis and Fine Chemicals
Next Article in Special Issue
Editorial Catalysts: Supported Metal Catalysts and Their Applications in Fine Chemicals
Previous Article in Journal
Nano-Ru Supported on Ni Nanowires for Low-Temperature Carbon Dioxide Methanation
Previous Article in Special Issue
Activated Carbon Supported Hafnium(IV) Chloride as an Efficient, Recyclable, and Facile Removable Catalyst for Expeditious Parallel Synthesis of Benzimidazoles
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Role of Support Hydrophobicity in the Selective Hydrogenation of Enones and Unsaturated Sulfones over Cu/SiO2 Catalysts

1
Department of Chemistry, University of Milano, Via Golgi 19, I-20133 Milano, Italy
2
CNR SCITEC, Via C. Golgi 19, I-20133 Milano, Italy
3
CNR SCITEC, Via G. Fantoli 16/15, I-20138 Milano, Italy
4
CNR ICCOM, Via G. Moruzzi 1, I-56124 Pisa, Italy
5
SCSOP, via Bornò 5, I-23896 Sirtori (LC), Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Catalysts 2020, 10(5), 515; https://doi.org/10.3390/catal10050515
Submission received: 17 April 2020 / Revised: 1 May 2020 / Accepted: 5 May 2020 / Published: 7 May 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Supported Metal Catalysts and Their Applications in Fine Chemicals)

Abstract

:
The substitution of complex hydrides and Ni- and noble metal-based catalysts in the synthesis of pharma and fragrance products is a relevant topic in the green chemistry scenario. Here, we report that non-toxic, non-noble metal-based Cu/SiO2 catalysts are effective and very selective in the hydrogenation of α,β-unsaturated ketones, esters and sulfones under very mild conditions. Vanillyl acetone can be obtained in quantitative yield in 1 h at 90 °C and 1 bar of H2. High dispersion of the metallic phase and support wettability play a significant role in determining catalytic performance.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

The selective hydrogenation of α,β-unsaturated ketones represents an important transformation step in a series of synthetic routes due to the easy preparation of α,β-enones via condensation [1] and the importance of the corresponding saturated ketones for pharmaceutical and flavor and fragrance (F&F) applications [2]. The synthesis of enones mainly relies on condensation reactions that allow one to obtain the α,β-unsaturated products in high yield and under consolidated procedures. The following selective hydrogenation of the C=C double bond, while leaving the C=O group unaffected, gives the corresponding saturated ketones (Scheme 1).
This is the case of Nabumetone® [4-(6-methoxy-2-naphtalenyl)-2-butanone] (Scheme 2), a nonacidic broad-spectrum anti-inflammatory, analgesic and antipyretic. All the synthetic strategies employed entail the selective hydrogenation of the corresponding parent enone as the last preparation step [3,4,5,6,7]. In the open literature, it is reported to be efficiently hydrogenated under continuous-flow conditions by using Ni/Raney or Pd/C [8]. On the other hand, Rh/γ-Al2O3 prepared by deposition of rhodium nanoparticles from mesitylene-solvated rhodium atoms stabilized by trioctylamine [9] or Pd-pyridine poly(l-lactide) macrocomplex [10] were effectively used in batch reaction conditions.
The synthesis of some food and flavor additives involves the same selective reduction as well. Raspberry ketone, 4-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-2-butanone and vanillyl acetone (zingerone), 4-(4-hydroxy-3-methoxyphenyl)-butan-2-one are examples of this protocol [11] (Scheme 2). The former compound is a naturally occurring product which is found not only in raspberries but also in grapes, apples and peaches. Its fruity flavor and fragrance make it one of the most widespread additives in foods and cosmetics. Moreover, it has recently shown anti-insulin resistance and weight control activity [12]. The latter is one of the major components responsible for the ginger flavor after cooking. It has also been demonstrated that this compound has anti-diarrheal properties [13]. The high costs of these two natural extracted compounds led to the industrial use of the synthetic route, in which the last step is the selective double bond hydrogenation. This last step can be carried on for both substrates using NiB2 [14] or Rh/Al2O3 [15] catalyst in presence of H2.
The selective hydrogenation of enones is also an important topic in terpene chemistry. β-ionone and the analogue dihydro-β-ionone (Scheme 2), for example, are naturally occurring molecules found in violet and rose essential oils, and they are widely used in the formulation of fragrances. Following a synthetic strategy, the latter can be obtained through the selective hydrogenation of the former using Ni/Raney [16] or Ru/C [17].
Moreover, dihydrochalcones are important intermediates for the synthesis of naturally derived artificial sweeteners like Neohesperidin dihydrochalcone and Naringin dihydrochalcone [18]. Dihydrochalcone moieties also show interesting pharmacological properties such as anti-oxidant [19], anti-inflammatory [20] and anti-leishmaniasis [21] activities. Selective hydrogenation of the chalcones’ double bond to give dihydrochalcones is achieved using the metal/Lewis acid system Zn/HOAc with ultrasound irradiation [22], with in situ generation of H2 using the system Et3SiH/Pd-C [23] or using Pd/C together with a poisoning system Ph2S to achieve high selectivities [24].
Another class of high synthetic relevance is represented by that of sulfones. These functional groups are found very commonly in drug molecules and fine chemicals. Despite the fact that the selective hydrogenation of α,β-unsaturated sulfones represents a great synthetic challenge, very few examples of catalytic reactions can be found in the literature. The selective hydrogenation of the double bond can be achieved using binuclear palladium complexes [25] or using an ammonium formate/Pd-C system [26] or Pd/C as in the synthesis of Eletriptan [27].
Some of us have already reported on the use of highly dispersed copper catalysts as very active and selective systems for the reduction of β-ionone and 4-(6-methoxy-2-naphtalenyl)-2-butanone [28]. The use of copper instead of Ni or noble metal systems would be highly desirable. In fact, for example, Ni/Raney is known to be pyrophoric, leading to several safety related issues. Moreover, nickel is suspected to be carcinogenic and skin-sensitizing according to the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) [29]. Thus, in addition to the economic advantage, the permitted concentration of Cu elemental impurities in drugs, products and substances with respect to the cited nickel, rhodium and palladium is significantly greater, up to two orders of magnitude [30]. This aspect is far from negligible, considering that the catalyst residues coming from the synthetic process are considered to be one of the main and somehow unavoidable contamination sources [8].
Here, we wish to report some new results obtained in the hydrogenation of a series of α,β-unsaturated ketones and esters, as well as in the selective reduction of an unsaturated sulfone, thus significantly extending the synthetic scope of the materials proposed.

2. Results and Discussion

All the catalysts were prepared with the chemisorption–hydrolysis (CH) technique by using silicas with different surface areas and pore volumes and a copper loading of 8% by weight. In particular, three different commercial silicas were used, namely a pyrogenic one (SiO2 A) and two non-pyrogenic ones (SiO2 B and SiO2 C) with areas, pore volumes, -OH surface density and surface contact angle values reported in Table 1.
The main results obtained with different kind of silica-supported copper catalysts in the hydrogenation of α,β-unsaturated compounds, both ketones and esters, are presented in Table 2.
As already observed in the cases of β-ionone and Nabumetone [28], the CH Cu/SiO2 catalysts were revealed to be excellent systems for the selective hydrogenation of α,β-unsaturated systems, showing very good performances also with other substrates of potential interest, such as pharmaceutical and F&F intermediates and with unsaturated esters.
It is important to note that from the thermodynamic point of view C=C bonds should be hydrogenated more easily than C=O bonds. However, due to electronic delocalization in α,β-unsaturated carbonyl compounds, C=O bonds could be hydrogenated preferentially with respect to C=C bonds [2].
Cu/SiO2 A allows one to obtain a very high conversion and almost complete selectivity in the C=C hydrogenation with all the substrates tested, and the same results can be obtained with Cu/SiO2 B, but with a slightly slower rate. An even more marked decrease in activity was observed when using Cu/SiO2 C (Entries 5 and 8). The lower selectivity observed in β-ionone hydrogenation (Entries 1 and 3) can be ascribed to the hydrogenation of C=O to the alcohol giving the enol. By contrast, the general yield of the selective hydrogenation improves when the used substrate is an aromatic compound. This can be ascribed to a higher conjugation of the double bonds, leading to a minor activation energy required to hydrogenate the double bond [2].
The CH preparation method is based on the electrostatic interaction established between the precursor solution and the support surface, and it was used in the present study for each of the silicas chosen as the supports [31]. The catalyst is prepared by dispersing the silica support in a basic [Cu(NH3)4]2+ solution (pH = 9), well above the silica zero point charge. This means that, under these conditions, the silica surface will be negatively charged, driving a preferential adsorption of Cu2+ cationic species on silica. The procedure grants a very high dispersion of the copper oxide phase, ten times higher with respect to catalysts prepared with the same copper loading using the traditional incipient wetness (IW) technique [31] and the formation of very well-formed metal particles upon the following reduction [32].
Both of these aspects reflect into a very high activity of this class of catalytic systems in a wide variety of hydrogenation reactions, ranging from C=C double bond [33] to carbonyl compounds [34], although copper supported materials are not usually counted among the catalysts of choice in hydrogenation reactions, as Pd, Rh, Pt, Ni and Ru are the most employed ones [35].
The pivotal role of the preparation method is also confirmed in the present application, as shown by the complete inactivity of the catalysts prepared with the traditional IW technique (Entries 2 and 4, Table 2).
Scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM) analysis confirmed the presence of small (mean size diameter 2.4 nm) well-shaped and highly dispersed Cu nanoparticles (Figure 1). STEM images allowed us to highlight the nanoparticles, which are brighter in the images, and distinguish them from the amorphous SiO2 support.
The preparation method, and in turn the very high dispersion obtained, also reflect on the acidic properties of the copper catalysts presented here.
The role of Lewis acid sites in promoting both activity and selectivity in the hydrogenation of α,β-unsaturated carbonyl compounds is well known. Thus, they can coordinate with the Lewis basic C=O group via one of the oxygen lone pairs, thereby affecting the electronic distribution of the C=C bond and in turn its aptitude (proneness) to hydrogenation (Figure 2). Some catalytic systems have taken advantage of the synergy between metals with high hydrogenation activity and Lewis acid to reach excellent yield in the desired product. Pt nanoparticles deposited on an acidic MIL-101 MOF allowed us to achieve quantitative transformation of cinnamaldehyde into dihydro-cinnamaldehyde at room temperature and under atmospheric pressure of H2 [36] while Pd nanocubes assembled with an Fe-containing MIL101 MOF gave an improved selectivity and a 20-fold increased TOF (Turnover Frequency) with respect to the nude Pd catalyst in the hydrogenation of β-ionone [37]. In the case of Cu/SiO2 catalysts, some of us already showed that the very small and well-structured CuO and Cu particle-exposing step and edges can act as Lewis acid sites promoting reactions such as the opening of epoxides [38] or nucleophilic addition to the carbonyl group [32].
The important effect in terms of metallic phase dispersion is granted by the peculiar preparation method. On the other hand, the effect of the oxide or mixed oxide chosen as the support can play an important role in driving the selectivity of the reaction by exploiting different acid base properties or textural features [39,40].
In the present case, the differences observed within the three different commercial silicas used as supports mainly rely on the activity. The main textural and surface properties of the silicas used are reported in Table 1, and some considerations can be made with respect to the density of hydroxyl groups over the surface. Silica gels such as B and C present a higher hydrophilicity compared to pyrogenic silicas such as silica A.
Figure 3 shows the values of productivity (expressed as mmolprod gcat−1 h) obtained with Cu/SiO2 A, Cu/SiO2 B and Cu/SiO2 C in the hydrogenation of β-ionone and the precursor of vanillylacetone (zingerone) versus the hydrophilicity of the silicas used as the supports, expressed as mmolOH g−1. In terms of productivity, the best results were achieved with Cu/SiO2 A, which allowed us to obtain a value of 12.2 mmolprod gcat−1 h in the case of vanillylacetone.
The hydrophilic/hydrophobic properties of the support have been recently shown by some of us to have a significant role in the hydrogenation of carbonyl compounds to alcohols or diols [41]. This is due to interactions taking place between the hydroxyl groups of the product and the support surface, promoting desorption of the alcohol/diol when this is more hydrophobic.
From data reported in the graph, a common trend can be observed for both substrates, showing a correlation between the two values: the lower the hydrophilicity of the support, the higher the activity. This evidence is in agreement with the easier interaction of the C=C bond with a less polar surface.
This aspect has also been investigated by measuring the surface contact angle for the three silicas using propandiol drops instead of conventional water in order to elucidate the differences among silicas. As shown in Figure 4, the higher the contact angle, the higher the productivity obtained, confirming the trend observed with TGA measurements reported in Figure 3. Thus, the contact angle value increases with hydrophobicity, while the −OH density decreases. Data reported in Figure 3 and Figure 4 are therefore consistent in showing that productivity improves when using a more hydrophobic silica as the catalyst support. The more pronounced differences observed in the case of vanyllilacetone bearing an −OH group could be ascribed to the easier desorption of the product from the surface, thus speeding up the reaction, or generally to the presence of the aromatic group that is known to establish interactions with silanol groups via hydrogen bonding [42]. All these aspects could contribute to competition phenomena.
As clearly shown in Figure 5, the hydrogenation of the carbonyl group is also possible under the conditions used. However, the reaction proceeds in two well-separated steps, thus allowing the easy recovery of the pure desired product. An induction period of 1 h can be observed between the two hydrogenation steps. An explanation to this phenomenon could be found in the amount of time needed by the keto-enolic tautomerism to shift towards the enolic form.
Catalysts 10 00515 i015
Moreover, Cu/SiO2 A catalyst can be recycled without being pretreated four times, observing only a slight decrease in conversion while keeping selectivity unchanged in all the tests performed (Figure 6). The catalysts were simply separated from the reaction mixture and dried under nitrogen without any pre-treatment before each recycle step. This could justify the slight decrease in the activity of the catalyst, probably due to a pale poisoning and partial deactivation of the active sites. On the other hand, ICP (Inductively Coupled Plasma) analysis does not show any copper leaching taking place after the hydrogenation reaction, thus allowing us to exclude the effect of a lower copper content in the system.
The high activity observed for α,β-unsaturated compounds by using copper catalysts prompted us to investigate their application to another class of substrates of interest, namely unsaturated sulfones. As already mentioned in the introduction, the molecules in this class are precursors of some important pharma products such as Eletriptan, a drug for the treatment of migraine headaches [27]. In this case, aside from the already mentioned toxicity problems, the use of noble metal-based catalysts entails other selectivity concerns, such as the formation of products derived from C–S hydrogenolysis side reaction. Cu/SiO2 A and Cu/SiO2 B, which were the highest-performing catalysts in the α,β-unsaturated compounds, were therefore tested in the hydrogenation of sulfone 4 into the corresponding saturated 5.
A very similar trend was observed in the chemoselective reduction of α,β-unsaturated sulfone 4. Furthermore, in the reduction of the C=C double bond conjugated with SO2 group, both of the silica-supported catalysts showed a good activity and a very high selectivity into the saturated sulfone 5, thus showing, to the best of our knowledge, an unprecedented use of heterogeneous copper systems for this application. Moreover, also in this case, the catalyst supported on the less hydrophilic silica A gave a better performance.
For these substrates, the main undesired reaction is the hydrogenolysis into styrene and ethylbenzene, which is limited to less than 1% (Table 3). Thus, with Cu/SiO2 A, it is possible to obtain a >99% conversion with 98% of 5 within 6 h at 90 °C and 1 Bar of hydrogen. Interestingly, these catalysts are also active on sulfur compounds. This was also observed in the synthesis of thioethers starting from benzyl mercaptans and phenols.
The chance of using a low toxicity metal such as Cu in the final step of the synthesis of this kind of molecule is even more relevant if we consider that the maximum permitted daily exposure (PDE) in oral administration in a pharma product is 3400 µg day−1 for Cu, compared with 220 µg day−1 for Ni and 100 µg day−1 for a Pt group metal.
Catalysts 10 00515 i016

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Materials

Copper catalysts with a metal loading of 8% by weight of metal to weight of support were prepared with an already reported method called chemisorption–hydrolysis [31]. The right amount of Cu(NO3)2 was dissolved in 20 mL of distilled water and the pH of the solution was brought to 9 with an NH4OH solution. The corresponding support was added, and the obtained slurry was diluted with 3 L of distilled water at 0 °C. The supports used were SiO2 A (SSA = 380 m2 g−1) from Evonik, SiO2 B (BET = 460 m2 g−1 PV = 0.74 mL g−1) purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Merck) and SiO2 C (SSA = 693 m2 g−1; PV = 0.62 mL g−1) purchased from Mitsubishi Chemical Corporation. The obtained solid was then filtered and dried overnight at 110 °C. It was then calcined at 350 °C for 4 h in air. Before any reaction, the catalysts were pretreated at 270 °C under vacuum and reduced in a hydrogen atmosphere at the same temperature.
The incipient wetness (IW) sample was prepared by impregnating the silica support with a copper nitrate solution of proper concentration and volume in order to obtain 8% wt/wt loaded catalyst over the same silica as the support.

3.2. TGA Analysis

Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) was conducted on a PerkinElmer (Italy) 7 HT thermobalance. The analysis was performed by heating the samples from 50 to 1000 °C with a temperature ramp of 5 °C min−1. Loss of water was evaluated in the temperature range between 250 and 900 °C, and mmolOH per gcat was calculated using this formula: [(2 × Δwt %) × 10]/18 (g mol−1).

3.3. TEM Analysis

Scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM) analysis was performed using a ZEISS LIBRA200FE. The sample was gently smashed in an agate mortar, suspended in isopropyl alcohol for 20 min in an ultrasonic bath and dropped onto a lacey carbon-coated copper TEM grid. The sample was analyzed after complete solvent evaporation.

3.4. Conctact Angle Measurements

Static contact angle measurements of solid supports were performed with a Krüss Easy instrument on a disk of the sample (solid supports). A 1,3-propanediol drop of 5 μL was produced and gently placed on the surface. The drop profile was extrapolated using an appropriate fitting function. Measurements were repeated several times to obtain a statistically relevant population.

3.5. Hydrogenation Reactions

A 9 mL solution of the reagent (0.5 mmol) in toluene was added under a nitrogen atmosphere to a reaction vessel containing the pre-reduced catalyst (50 mg, 0.06 mol of Cu). The reactions were carried out at different temperature under a hydrogen atmosphere and using magnetic stirring. The reaction was monitored through gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS) (Agilent 5957C) by using a HP-5 column (5%phenylmethylpolysiloxane). The conversion and the selectivity of each reaction were determined with the same method. The recycling was carried out by simply decanting the suspension, removing the reaction solution and adding the fresh one to the system. In the case of hydrogenation of trans-phenyl-α,β-styrylsulfone, an 8 mL solution of the reagent (0.5 mmol) in n-heptane were added under nitrogen atmosphere in a reaction vessel containing the pre-reduced catalyst (100 mg).

4. Conclusions

The use of highly dispersed copper catalysts onto silica prepared with an electrostatic interaction strategy allows one to selectively reduce C=C double bonds in a wide range of α,β-unsaturated systems. Both the preparation method and the silica used as the support contribute to the high activity observed. In particular, hydrophobicity of the silica used was revealed to be an important aspect in the activity observed. The use of copper catalysts instead of the usually proposed noble metal- or Ni-based systems represents a great advantage as far as toxicity issues are concerned when designing a hydrogenation step for pharma or F&F products.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, N.R., F.Z. and O.P.; methodology, D.C.; formal analysis, D.C. and M.M.; investigation, D.C., F.Z. and C.E.; data curation, F.Z. and N.R; writing—original draft preparation, D.C and F.Z.; writing—review and editing, N.R. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Patai, S.; Rappoport, Z. The Chemistry of Enones; John Wiley & Sons Ltd.: Chichester, UK, 1986. [Google Scholar]
  2. Rinaldi, R. Catalytic Hydrogenation for Biomass Valorization; RSC: Cambridge, UK, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  3. Fitch, J.R.; Aslam, M.; Rios, D.E.; Smith, J.C. Use of 4-Substituted 2-Butanones to Prepare Nabumetone. Patent EP0892775A2, 27 January 1997. [Google Scholar]
  4. Mody, P.A.; Motivala, J.K.; Mehta, C.D. A Novel Process for the Manufacture of 4-(6-Methoxy-2-naphthyl)buten-2-one and Its Pharmaceutical Composition, from a Novel Source. Indian Patent 178589, 1997. [Google Scholar]
  5. Ramachandran, V.; Belmont, S. Production of Naphthyl-Substituted Ketones from Naphthaldehydes. Patent US5861538A, 8 December 1998. [Google Scholar]
  6. Cabri, W.; Magrone, D.; Oldani, E.; Angelici, R. U.S. Process for the Preparation of 4-(6′-methoxy-2′-naphthyl) Butan-2-One. U.S. Patent 5955635, 21 September 1999. [Google Scholar]
  7. Piccolo, O.; Verrazzani, A. Preparation and Use of a Heterogeneous Rhodium Catalyst for the Hydrogenation of a Double Bond of an α-β-Unsaturated Carbonyl Compound. U.S. Patent US7087548B2, 8 August 2006. [Google Scholar]
  8. Viviano, M.; Glasnov, T.N.; Reichart, B.; Tekautz, G.; Kappe, C.O. A scalable two-step continuous flow synthesis of nabumetone and related 4-aryl-2-butanones. Org. Process Res. Dev. 2011, 15, 858–870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Evangelisti, C.; Panziera, N.; Vitulli, M.; Pertici, P.; Balzano, F.; Uccello-Barretta, G.; Salvadori, P. Supported rhodium nanoparticles obtained by Metal Vapour Synthesis as catalysts in the preparation of valuable organic compounds. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 2008, 339, 84–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Bartoli, M.; Rosi, L.; Petrucci, G.; Armelao, L.; Oberhauser, W.; Frediani, M.; Piccolo, O.; Rathod, V.D.; Paganelli, S. An easily recoverable and recyclable homogeneous polyester-based Pd catalytic system for the hydrogenation of α,β-unsaturated carbonyl compounds. Catal. Commun. 2015, 69, 228–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Malkar, R.S.; Yadav, G.D. Selectivity Engineering in One Pot Synthesis of Raspberry Ketone: Crossed Aldol Condensation of p-Hydroxybenzaldehyde and Acetone and Hydrogenation over Novel Ni/Zn-La Mixed Oxide. ChemistrySelect 2019, 4, 2140–2152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Mehanna, E.T.; Barakat, B.M.; ElSayed, M.H.; Tawfik, M.K. An optimized dose of raspberry ketones controls hyperlipidemia and insulin resistance in male obese rats: Effect on adipose tissue expression of adipocytokines and Aquaporin 7. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2018, 832, 81–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Chen, J.C.; Huang, L.J.; Wu, S.L.; Kuo, S.C.; Ho, T.Y.; Hsiang, C.Y. Ginger and its bioactive component inhibit enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli heat-labile enterotoxin-induced diarrhea in mice. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2007, 55, 8390–8397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Bandarenko, M.; Kovalenko, V. Synthesis of raspberry and ginger ketones by nickel boride-catalyzed hydrogenation of 4-arylbut-3-en-2-ones. Zeitschrift fur Naturforsch. Sect. B J. Chem. Sci. 2014, 69, 885–888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Smith, L.R. Rheosmin (Raspberry Ketone) and Zingerone, and Their Preparation by Crossed Aldol-Catalytic Hydrogenation Sequences. Chem. Educ. 1996, 1, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Masuda, H.; Mihara, S. Production of Dihydro-β-ionol. Japanese Patent 61,036239, 1986. [Google Scholar]
  17. Chapuis, C.; Jacoby, D. Catalysis in the preparation of fragrances and flavours. Appl. Catal. A General 2001, 221, 93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Kinghorn, A.D.; Chin, Y.W.; Pan, L.; Jia, Z. Natural products as sweeteners and sweetness modifiers. Compr. Nat. Prod. II Chem. Biol. 2010, 3, 269–315. [Google Scholar]
  19. Nakamura, Y.; Watanabe, S.; Miyake, N.; Kohno, H.; Osawa, T. Dihydrochalcones: Evaluation as novel radical scavenging antioxidants. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2003, 51, 3309–3312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Zhao, F.; Nozawa, H.; Daikonnya, A.; Kondo, K.; Kitanaka, S. Inhibitors of nitric oxide production from hops (Humulus lupulus L.). Biol. Pharm. Bull. 2003, 26, 61–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  21. Hermoso, A.; Jiménez, I.A.; Mamani, Z.A.; Bazzocchi, I.L.; Piñero, J.E.; Ravelo, A.G.; Valladares, B. Antileishmanial activities of dihydrochalcones from piper elongatum and synthetic related compounds. Structural requirements for activity. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2003, 11, 3975–3980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Zhang, L.; Zhang, W.; Wang, X.; Bao, K.; Lu, G.; Lin, J. Ultrasound Assisted Selective Reduction of Chalcones to Dihydrochalcones by Zn/HOAc. Lett. Org. Chem. 2008, 5, 370–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Jesus, A.R.; Marques, A.P.; Rauter, A.P. An easy approach to dihydrochalcones via chalcone in situ hydrogenation. Pure Appl. Chem. 2016, 88, 349–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Mori, A.; Mizusaki, T.; Miyakawa, Y.; Ohashi, E.; Haga, T.; Maegawa, T.; Monguchi, Y.; Sajiki, H. Chemoselective hydrogenation method catalyzed by Pd/C using diphenylsulfide as a reasonable catalyst poison. Tetrahedron 2006, 62, 11925–11932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Cho, I.S.; Alper, H. Palladium Catalyzed Hydrogenation of α,β-Unsaturated Sulfones and Phosphonates. J. Org. Chem. 1994, 59, 4027–4028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Ranu, B.C.; Guchhait, S.K.; Ghosh, K. Chemoselective Hydrogenation of α,β-Unsaturated Sulfones and Phosphonates via Palladium-Assisted Hydrogen Transfer by Ammonium Formate. J. Org. Chem. 1998, 63, 5250–5251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Serafini, S.; Castellin, A.; Dal Santo, C. Synthesis of 3-{[(2R)-1-methylpyrrolidin-2-yl]methyl}-5[2-(phenylsulfonyl)ethyl]-1H-Indole. U.S. Patent US8426612B2, 23 April 2013. [Google Scholar]
  28. Ravasio, N.; Zaccheria, F.; Allegrini, P.; Ercoli, M. Selective hydrogenation of 4-(6-methoxy-2-naphtyl)-3-buten-2-one to Nabumetone®. Catal. Today 2007, 121, 2–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Available online: https://echa.europa.eu/ (accessed on 6 May 2020).
  30. Agency, E.M. ICH Guideline Q3D on Elemental Impurities. 2016, 44, p. 84. Available online: www.ema.europa.eu/contact (accessed on 6 May 2020).
  31. Zaccheria, F.; Scotti, N.; Marelli, M.; Psaro, R.; Ravasio, N. Unravelling the properties of supported copper oxide: Can the particle size induce acidic behaviour? Dalt. Trans. 2013, 42, 1319–1328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Scotti, N.; Dangate, M.; Gervasini, A.; Evangelisti, C.; Ravasio, N.; Zaccheria, F. Unraveling the role of low coordination sites in a cu metal nanoparticle: A step toward the selective synthesis of second generation biofuels. ACS Catal. 2014, 4, 2818–2826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Zaccheria, F.; Psaro, R.; Ravasio, N. Selective hydrogenation of alternative oils: A useful tool for the production of biofuels. Green Chem. 2009, 11, 462–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Zaccheria, F.; Ravasio, N.; Psaro, R.; Fusi, A. Heterogeneous selective catalytic hydrogenation of aryl ketones to alcohols without additives. Tetrahedron Lett. 2005, 46, 3695–3697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Augustine, R.L. Heterogeneous Catalysis for Synthetic Chemist; Marcel Dekker: New York, NY, USA, 1996; ISBN 0824790219. [Google Scholar]
  36. Liu, H.; Li, Z.; Li, Y. Chemoselective hydrogenation of cinnamaldehyde over a Pt-Lewis acid collaborative catalyst under ambient conditions. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2015, 54, 1487–1497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Bakuru, V.R.; Kalidindi, S.B. Synergistic Hydrogenation over Palladium through the Assembly of MIL-101(Fe) MOF over Palladium Nanocubes. Chem. A Eur. J. 2017, 23, 16456–16459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Zaccheria, F.; Santoro, F.; Psaro, R.; Ravasio, N. Heterogeneous: Copper catalysts for synthetic purposes Building new simple bifunctional materials. Chim. Oggi 2011, 29, 22–25. [Google Scholar]
  39. Zaccheria, F.; Ravasio, N.; Fusi, A.; Rodondi, M.; Psaro, R. Tuning selectivity in terpene chemistry: Selective hydrogenation versus cascade reactions over copper catalysts. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2005, 34, 1267–1272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Santoro, F.; Psaro, R.; Ravasio, N.; Zaccheria, F. Reductive Amination of Ketones or Amination of Alcohols over Heterogeneous Cu Catalysts: Matching the Catalyst Support with the N-Alkylating Agent. ChemCatChem 2012, 4, 1249–1254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Cavuoto, D.; Ravasio, N.; Scotti, N.; Cappelletti, G.; Venezia, A.M.; Zaccheria, F. The role of support wettability in the hydrogenation of γ–valerolactone over Cu/SiO2. Catal. Today 2020. in prep. [Google Scholar]
  42. Ringwald, S.C.; Pemberton, J.E. Adsorption interactions of aromatics and heteroaromatics with hydrated and dehydrated silica surfaces by raman and FTIR spectroscopies. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2000, 34, 259–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Scheme 1. Different strategies for the synthesis of enones and the following hydrogenation step.
Scheme 1. Different strategies for the synthesis of enones and the following hydrogenation step.
Catalysts 10 00515 sch001
Scheme 2. Selectively hydrogenated products.
Scheme 2. Selectively hydrogenated products.
Catalysts 10 00515 sch002
Figure 1. Representative STEM images of sample Cu/SiO2 A and related particle size distribution (inset on the left side).
Figure 1. Representative STEM images of sample Cu/SiO2 A and related particle size distribution (inset on the left side).
Catalysts 10 00515 g001
Figure 2. Lewis site role in the double bond hydrogenation of an α,β-unsaturated carbonyl compound.
Figure 2. Lewis site role in the double bond hydrogenation of an α,β-unsaturated carbonyl compound.
Catalysts 10 00515 g002
Figure 3. Productivity vs. hydroxyl group density of different silica catalysts in the hydrogenation of β-ionone and vanyllilacetone.
Figure 3. Productivity vs. hydroxyl group density of different silica catalysts in the hydrogenation of β-ionone and vanyllilacetone.
Catalysts 10 00515 g003
Figure 4. Productivity vs. surface contact angle of different silica catalysts in the hydrogenation of β-ionone and vanyllilacetone and picture of the contact angle measurement.
Figure 4. Productivity vs. surface contact angle of different silica catalysts in the hydrogenation of β-ionone and vanyllilacetone and picture of the contact angle measurement.
Catalysts 10 00515 g004
Figure 5. Molar percentages of reagent and products vs. time of zingerone hydrogenation reaction.
Figure 5. Molar percentages of reagent and products vs. time of zingerone hydrogenation reaction.
Catalysts 10 00515 g005
Figure 6. Recycles of hydrogenation of 4-(4-Hydroxyphenyl)but-3-en-2-one with Cu/SiO2 A.
Figure 6. Recycles of hydrogenation of 4-(4-Hydroxyphenyl)but-3-en-2-one with Cu/SiO2 A.
Catalysts 10 00515 g006
Table 1. Textural properties of silicas used as supports.
Table 1. Textural properties of silicas used as supports.
SupportSSA (m2 g−1)PV (mL g−1)mmolOH gcat−1Contact Angle
SiO2 A380-1.5131°
SiO2 B4600.743.819°
SiO2 C6930.624.117°
Table 2. Selective reduction of different α,β-unsaturated compounds with silica-supported copper catalysts at 90 °C and 1 Bar of H2.
Table 2. Selective reduction of different α,β-unsaturated compounds with silica-supported copper catalysts at 90 °C and 1 Bar of H2.
SubstrateProductEntryCatalystt (h)Conv (%)Sel (%)
Catalysts 10 00515 i001 Catalysts 10 00515 i0021Cu/SiO2 A14690
397100
2Cu/SiO2 A (IW)60-
3Cu/SiO2 B11979
69490
4Cu/SiO2 B (IW)60-
5Cu/SiO2 C10-
510100
Catalysts 10 00515 i003 Catalysts 10 00515 i0046Cu/SiO2 A1100100
7Cu/SiO2 B170100
2100100
8Cu/SiO2 C113100
575100
Catalysts 10 00515 i005 Catalysts 10 00515 i0069Cu/SiO2 A191100
10Cu/SiO2 B635100
Catalysts 10 00515 i007 Catalysts 10 00515 i00811Cu/SiO2 A2100100
12Cu/SiO2 B2100100
Catalysts 10 00515 i009 Catalysts 10 00515 i01013Cu/SiO2 A3100100
14Cu/SiO2 B5100100
Catalysts 10 00515 i011 Catalysts 10 00515 i01215Cu/SiO2 A293100
16Cu/SiO2 B390100
Catalysts 10 00515 i013 Catalysts 10 00515 i01417Cu/SiO2 A393100
18Cu/SiO2 B579100
Table 3. Trans-phenyl-styrylsulfone hydrogenation reactions with silica-supported Cu catalysts at 1 Bar of H2.
Table 3. Trans-phenyl-styrylsulfone hydrogenation reactions with silica-supported Cu catalysts at 1 Bar of H2.
CatalystT (°C)t (h)Conv (%)Sel 5 (%)
Cu/SiO2 B9013598
25598
47898
79899
24>9998
Cu/SiO2 A9016698
29498
4>9998
Cu/SiO2 A7021999
43199
249298

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Cavuoto, D.; Zaccheria, F.; Marelli, M.; Evangelisti, C.; Piccolo, O.; Ravasio, N. The Role of Support Hydrophobicity in the Selective Hydrogenation of Enones and Unsaturated Sulfones over Cu/SiO2 Catalysts. Catalysts 2020, 10, 515. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal10050515

AMA Style

Cavuoto D, Zaccheria F, Marelli M, Evangelisti C, Piccolo O, Ravasio N. The Role of Support Hydrophobicity in the Selective Hydrogenation of Enones and Unsaturated Sulfones over Cu/SiO2 Catalysts. Catalysts. 2020; 10(5):515. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal10050515

Chicago/Turabian Style

Cavuoto, Denise, Federica Zaccheria, Marcello Marelli, Claudio Evangelisti, Oreste Piccolo, and Nicoletta Ravasio. 2020. "The Role of Support Hydrophobicity in the Selective Hydrogenation of Enones and Unsaturated Sulfones over Cu/SiO2 Catalysts" Catalysts 10, no. 5: 515. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal10050515

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop