Postvoid Residual Volume After Radical Hysterectomy for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer: Predictive Factors and a Decision-Making Algorithm †
Simple Summary
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Methods
2.1. Patients and Study Design
2.2. Postoperative Care
2.3. Study Data
2.4. Statistical Analysis
3. Results
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Querleu, D.; Morrow, C.P. Classification of radical hysterectomy. Lancet Oncol. 2008, 9, 297–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Querleu, D.; Cibula, D.; Abu-Rustum, N.R. 2017 Update on the Querleu-Morrow Classification of Radical Hysterectomy. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2017, 24, 3406–3412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Maas, C.P.; Kenter, G.G.; Trimbos, J.B.; Deruiter, M.C. Anatomical basis for nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy: Immunohistochemical study of the pelvic autonomic nerves. Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand. 2005, 84, 868–874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Butler-Manuel, S.A.; Buttery, L.D.; A’Hern, R.P.; Polak, J.M.; Barton, D.P. Pelvic nerve plexus trauma at radical hysterectomy and simple hysterectomy: The nerve content of the uterine supporting ligaments. Cancer 2000, 89, 834–841, Erratum in Cancer 2000, 89, 2144. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0142(20000815)89:4<834::aid-cncr16>3.0.co;2-7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kostov, S.; Sorokin, P.; Rezende, B.; Yalçın, H.; Selçuk, I. Radical Hysterectomy or Total Mesometrial Resection-Two Anatomical Concepts for Surgical Treatment of Cancer of the Uterine Cervix. Cancers 2023, 15, 5295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yabuki, Y.; Asamoto, A.; Hoshiba, T.; Nishimoto, H.; Kitamura, S. Dissection of the cardinal ligament in radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer with emphasis on the lateral ligament. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 1991, 164, 7–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rob, L.; Halaska, M.; Robova, H. Nerve-sparing and individually tailored surgery for cervical cancer. Lancet Oncol. 2010, 11, 292–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Centini, G.; Afors, K.; Murtada, R.; Castellano, J.; Lazzeri, L.; Fernandes, R.; Wattiez, A. Step-by-step Type C Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy With Nerve-sparing Approach. J. Minim. Invasive Gynecol. 2015, 22, 545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zapardiel, I.; Kocian, R.; Köhler, C.; Klat, J.; Germanova, A.; Jacob, A.; Bajsova, S.; Böhmer, G.; Lay, L.; Gil-Ibañez, B.; et al. Voiding recovery after radical parametrectomy in cervical cancer patients: An international prospective multicentre trial—SENTIX. Gynecol. Oncol. 2021, 160, 729–734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zullo, M.A.; Manci, N.; Angioli, R.; Muzii, L.; Panici, P.B. Vesical dysfunctions after radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: A critical review. Crit. Rev. Oncol. Hematol. 2003, 48, 287–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Plotti, F.; Angioli, R.; Zullo, M.A.; Sansone, M.; Altavilla, T.; Antonelli, E.; Montera, R.; Damiani, P.; Benedetti Panici, P. Update on urodynamic bladder dysfunctions after radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer. Crit. Rev. Oncol. Hematol. 2011, 80, 323–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Laterza, R.M.; Sievert, K.D.; de Ridder, D.; Vierhout, M.E.; Haab, F.; Cardozo, L.; van Kerrebroeck, P.; Cruz, F.; Kelleher, C.; Espuña-Pons, M.; et al. Bladder function after radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer. Neurourol. Urodyn. 2015, 34, 309–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chen, G.D.; Lin, L.Y.; Wang, P.H.; Lee, H.S. Urinary tract dysfunction after radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer. Gynecol. Oncol. 2002, 85, 292–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Cao, T.T.; Wen, H.W.; Gao, Y.N.; Lyu, Q.B.; Liu, H.X.; Wang, S.; Wang, S.Y.; Sun, H.X.; Yu, N.; Wang, H.B.; et al. Urodynamic assessment of bladder storage function after radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer. Chin. Med. J. 2020, 133, 2274–2280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, X.; Chen, Y.; Zhong, Y.; Chen, X.; Shi, H.; Liu, J.; Cai, L.; Sun, P. Recently urodynamic and quality of life assessment in the non-menopausal women with cervical cancer after radical hysterectomy. Support. Care Cancer 2023, 31, 389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pieterse, Q.D.; Maas, C.P.; ter Kuile, M.M.; Lowik, M.; van Eijkeren, M.A.; Trimbos, J.B.; Kenter, G.G. An observational longitudinal study to evaluate miction, defecation, and sexual function after radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy for early-stage cervical cancer. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer 2006, 16, 1119–1129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Charoenkwan, K.; Pranpanas, S. Prevalence and characteristics of late postoperative voiding dysfunction in early-stage cervical cancer patients treated with radical hysterectomy. Asian Pac. J. Cancer Prev. 2007, 8, 387–389. [Google Scholar]
- Raspagliesi, F.; Ditto, A.; Fontanelli, R.; Solima, E.; Hanozet, F.; Zanaboni, F.; Kusamura, S. Nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy: A surgical technique for preserving the autonomic hypogastric nerve. Gynecol. Oncol. 2004, 93, 307–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Raspagliesi, F.; Ditto, A.; Fontanelli, R.; Zanaboni, F.; Solima, E.; Spatti, G.; Hanozet, F.; Vecchione, F.; Rossi, G.; Kusamura, S. Type II versus Type III nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy: Comparison of lower urinary tract dysfunctions. Gynecol. Oncol. 2006, 102, 256–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aue-Aungkul, A.; Kietpeerakool, C.; Rattanakanokchai, S.; Galaal, K.; Temtanakitpaisan, T.; Ngamjarus, C.; Lumbiganon, P. Postoperative interventions for preventing bladder dysfunction after radical hysterectomy in women with early-stage cervical cancer. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2021, 1, CD012863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Mercadel, A.J.; Holloway, S.B.; Saripella, M.; Lea, J.S. Risk factors for catheter-associated urinary tract infections following radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2023, 228, 718.e1–718.e7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Nasr, A. State of the globe: Catheterizations continue to cultivate urinary infections. J. Glob. Infect. Dis. 2010, 2, 81–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Naik, R.; Maughan, K.; Nordin, A.; Lopes, A.; Godfrey, K.A.; Hatem, M.H. A prospective randomised controlled trial of intermittent self-catheterisation vs. supra-pubic catheterisation for post-operative bladder care following radical hysterectomy. Gynecol. Oncol. 2005, 99, 437–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Poston, G.J.; Joseph, A.E.; Riddle, P.R. The accuracy of ultrasound in the measurement of changes in bladder volume. Br. J. Urol. 1983, 55, 361–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dindo, D.; Demartines, N.; Clavien, P.A. Classification of surgical complications: A new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann. Surg. 2004, 240, 205–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huepenbecker, S.; Santía, M.C.; Harrison, R.; Dos Reis, R.; Pareja, R.; Iniesta, M.D.; Meyer, L.A.; Frumovitz, M.; Zorrilla-Vaca, A.; Ramirez, P.T. Impact of timing of urinary catheter removal on voiding dysfunction after radical hysterectomy for early cervical cancer. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer 2022, 32, 986–992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chamberlain, D.H.; Hopkins, M.P.; Roberts, J.A.; McGuire, E.J.; Morley, G.W.; Wang, C. The effects of early removal of indwelling urinary catheter after radical hysterectomy. Gynecol. Oncol. 1991, 43, 98–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shinnick, J.K.; Rosenthal, A.; Pearson, J.; Raju, R.; Youssef, A.; Lips, E.M.; Raker, C.; Scarpaci, M.M.; Occhino, J.; Glaser, G.; et al. Timing of trial of void after radical hysterectomy: Long-term urinary outcomes at two academic tertiary care institutions. Int. Urogynecol. J. 2024, 35, 1961–1968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mengatto, M.F.; Castro, B.G.R.; Nobrega, L.; Vieira, M.A.; Andrade, C.E.M.C.; Tsunoda, A.T.; de Andrade, D.A.P.; Dos Reis, R. Early removal of indwelling urinary catheter after radical surgery for early-stage cervical cancer: A cohort study. J. Surg. Oncol. 2020, 122, 1498–1505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Turnbull, H.; Burbos, N.; Abu-Freij, M.; Duncan, T.J.; Nieto, J.J. A novel approach to postoperative bladder care in women after radical hysterectomy. Arch. Gynecol. Obstet. 2012, 286, 1007–1010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chikazawa, K.; Muro, S.; Yamaguchi, K.; Imai, K.; Kuwata, T.; Konno, R.; Akita, K. Denonvilliers’ fascia as a potential nerve-course marker for the female urinary bladder. Gynecol. Oncol. 2024, 184, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]



| Variable [Mean (SD), Median (IQR) or n (%)] | Total (n = 67) |
|---|---|
| BMI (kg/m2) | 23.4 (21.4–29.7) |
| Approach | |
| Laparotomy | 18 (26.9) |
| Laparoscopy | 10 (14.9) |
| Robotic-assisted | 39 (58.2) |
| Type of radicality | |
| B1 | 31 (46.3) |
| C1 | 36 (53.7) |
| Preoperative FIGO stage (2018) | |
| IA1 | 1 (1.5) |
| IB1 | 48 (71.6) |
| IB2 | 14 (20.9) |
| IIA1 | 4 (6.0) |
| Operative time | 270 (240–290) |
| Estimated blood loss | 100 (50–250) |
| Length of stay | 2 (2–3) |
| Intraoperative complications | 3 (4.5) |
| Postoperative complications | 7 |
| Clavien-Dindo | |
| II | 6 |
| III * | 1 |
| Type of postoperative complications | |
| Gastrointestinal | 1 |
| Wound dehiscence | 1 |
| Urinary Tract Infection | 4 |
| Postoperative bleeding | 1 |
| Readmission | 1 (1.5) |
| Reintervention | 1 (1.5) |
| Histology | |
| Squamous | 36 (53.7) |
| Adenocarcinoma HPV-related | 28 (41.8) |
| Adenocarcinoma HPV-unrelated | 3 (4.5) |
| Variable | Univariate Analysis | p Value | Multivariate Analysis | p Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean post-void residual urine (1st day) | 1.01 (1.01–1.02) | <0.001 | 1.01 (1.01–1.02) | 0.001 |
| Radicality | ||||
| B1 RH | Ref | |||
| C1 | 11.60 (2.40–56.12) | 0.002 | 11.46 (1.75–75.24) | 0.011 |
| Approach | ||||
| Laparotomy | Ref | |||
| Laparoscopy | 0.86 (0.16–4.55) | 0.856 | ||
| Robotic-assisted | 0.60 (0.18–2.05) | 0.416 | ||
| Parity | ||||
| Nulliparous | ref | |||
| One previous pregnancy | 0.6 (0.08–4.44) | 0.617 | ||
| >1 previous pregnancy | 1.4 (0.33–6.24) | 0.623 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Seminario, N.; Bebia, V.; Luzarraga Aznar, A.; José, M.S.; Vallés, E.; Bonaldo, G.; Gil-Moreno, A.; Angeles, M.A. Postvoid Residual Volume After Radical Hysterectomy for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer: Predictive Factors and a Decision-Making Algorithm. Cancers 2026, 18, 24. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers18010024
Seminario N, Bebia V, Luzarraga Aznar A, José MS, Vallés E, Bonaldo G, Gil-Moreno A, Angeles MA. Postvoid Residual Volume After Radical Hysterectomy for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer: Predictive Factors and a Decision-Making Algorithm. Cancers. 2026; 18(1):24. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers18010024
Chicago/Turabian StyleSeminario, Naia, Vicente Bebia, Ana Luzarraga Aznar, Marta San José, Elvira Vallés, Giulio Bonaldo, Antonio Gil-Moreno, and Martina Aida Angeles. 2026. "Postvoid Residual Volume After Radical Hysterectomy for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer: Predictive Factors and a Decision-Making Algorithm" Cancers 18, no. 1: 24. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers18010024
APA StyleSeminario, N., Bebia, V., Luzarraga Aznar, A., José, M. S., Vallés, E., Bonaldo, G., Gil-Moreno, A., & Angeles, M. A. (2026). Postvoid Residual Volume After Radical Hysterectomy for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer: Predictive Factors and a Decision-Making Algorithm. Cancers, 18(1), 24. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers18010024

