Next Article in Journal
A Novel Dye-Sensitized Solar Cell Structure Based on Metal Photoanode without FTO/ITO
Next Article in Special Issue
New Era of Electroceuticals: Clinically Driven Smart Implantable Electronic Devices Moving towards Precision Therapy
Previous Article in Journal
Graphitisation of Waste Carbon Powder with Femtosecond Laser Annealing
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Review of the Commercially Available ECG Detection and Transmission Systems—The Fuzzy Logic Approach in the Prevention of Sudden Cardiac Arrest
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A Circularly Polarized Implantable Rectenna for Microwave Wireless Power Transfer

1
School of Electronic and Information Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510640, China
2
National Engineering Technology Research Center for Mobile Ultrasonic Detection, Guangzhou 510640, China
3
School of Electronic and Information, Guangdong Polytechnic Normal University, Guangzhou 510665, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Micromachines 2022, 13(1), 121; https://doi.org/10.3390/mi13010121
Submission received: 12 December 2021 / Revised: 9 January 2022 / Accepted: 10 January 2022 / Published: 12 January 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Smart Implants)

Abstract

:
A circularly polarized implantable antenna integrated with a voltage-doubled rectifier (abbr., rectenna) is investigated for microwave wireless power transfer in the industrial, scientific, and medical (ISM) band of 2.4–2.48 GHz. The proposed antenna is miniaturized with the dimensions of 7.5 mm × 7.5 mm × 1.27 mm by etching four C-shaped open slots on the patch. A rectangular slot truncated diagonally is cut to improve the circular polarization performance of the antenna. The simulated impedance bandwidth in a three-layer phantom is 30.4% (1.9–2.58 GHz) with |S11| below −10 dB, and the 3-dB axial-ratio bandwidth is 16.9% (2.17–2.57 GHz). Furthermore, a voltage-doubled rectifier circuit that converts RF power to DC power is designed on the back of the antenna. The simulated RF-to-DC conversion efficiency can be up to 45% at the input power of 0 dBm. The proposed rectenna was fabricated and measured in fresh pork to verify the simulated results and evaluate the performance of wireless power transfer.

1. Introduction

Implantable medical devices (IMDs), which send information about human physiology to external medical receivers wirelessly through the implanted antenna and allow doctors to diagnose and treat patients conveniently [1], are now widely used in various medical scenarios, such as pacemakers [2], nerve stimulators [3], and biosensors [4]. To supply power to IMDs properly inside the human body, lithium batteries are always equipped [5,6]. Nevertheless, expensive surgical operations are needed to change the life-limited batteries, and also cause the patient to suffer pain. Due to wireless power transfer (WPT), it has the potential to extend the lifetime of IMDs and alleviate the operation pains of patients. Depending on the different application scenarios [7], a few WPT works including near-field coupling [8,9,10] and microwave radiation [11,12,13,14,15] have been developed. Compared with microwave radiation, the near-field coupling system is usually shorter in transmission distance and larger in size. Hence, WPT based on microwave radiation may be a better approach for the tiny IMDs.
In the receiving element of the microwave WPT system, an implantable antenna for receiving RF power and a rectifier circuit for converting RF power into DC power are needed. Implantable linearly polarized rectennas for far-field microwave WPT are designed and analyzed in [11,12,13]. A triple-band implantable rectenna with a stacked and spiral structure is proposed in [11]. Those three frequency bands could be used for data telemetry, wake-up/sleep controller, and WPT, respectively. Compact-size implantable rectennas with planar inverted-F antenna (PIFA) and a rectifier are designed in [12] and [13]. Through adding a parasitic patch [12] or commercially available gel [13] on the surface of the human body, the received power levels are enhanced by 12.9 dB and 6.2 dB, respectively. In addition to far-field microwave WPT, rectennas in [14,15] are also proposed for near-field microwave WPT to obtain high transmission efficiency.
Compared with linear polarization, circular polarization (CP) can make the position of the antenna more arbitrary and weaken the multipath effect [16,17,18,19]. In [16], a miniaturized CP implantable antenna is proposed by utilizing the capacitive loading on the radiator. To realize miniaturization by slow-wave effect, a CP implantable antenna with four LC loadings is designed in [17]. In [18], a wide-beamwidth circularly polarized implantable antenna is introduced by loading a complementary split-ring resonator (CSRR) and four C-shaped slots on the radiation patch. To extend the axial ratio (AR) bandwidth of the antenna, a wideband CP implantable antenna by exciting multiple degenerate modes is designed in [19]. For microwave WPT, a wireless power link including a CP implantable antenna is studied in [20]. The results show that the system can obtain higher DC power compared with the previous work, whereas the antenna has a narrow bandwidth.
In the wireless power transmission system, the wider the bandwidth of the antenna is, the more RF power at different frequencies the system can collect. Furthermore, broadband can also make implantable antennas more robust in the human body. In this work, a wideband CP implantable rectenna is proposed for microwave WPT operating in the ISM band of 2.4–2.48 GHz. The proposed rectenna consists of a compact CP implantable antenna and a rectifier circuit designed under the ground. By etching four C-shaped open slots, the proposed antenna is miniaturized and has a wide bandwidth. The CP purity of the proposed antenna can be optimized through a rectangular slot truncated diagonally. To establish a wireless power link and analyze the performance of power transmission, the proposed CP implantable rectenna was fabricated and tested.

2. Antenna Design and Discussion

2.1. Antenna Design

The geometry of the proposed antenna is illustrated in Figure 1. The optimized dimensions with the electromagnetic numerical simulation software ANSYS HFSS v.18 are listed in Table 1. Four C-shaped open slots are etched in the four corners of the radiation patch, which can realize the miniaturization of the proposed antenna and excite a pair of degenerate modes with equal amplitude and orthogonal polarization. Furthermore, by loading a rectangular slot truncated diagonally in one of the C-shaped open slots, the CP purity of the antenna can be improved. As for the substrate and superstrate, the Rogers RO3010 (εr = 10.2, tan δ = 0.0035) with a high dielectric constant is employed to achieve miniaturization. The substrate and superstrate have the same thickness of 0.635 mm.
As shown in Figure 2, the three-layer phantom, consisting of skin, fat, and muscle, is introduced to simulate the working environment of the proposed antenna in the human body.
Due to the fact that the electromagnetic properties of human tissues change with frequency, the relative permittivity and conductivity of the three-layer human model are set at the central frequency of 2.45 GHz [21]. The proposed antenna is implanted at a depth d = 4 mm in the muscle. The total depth of implantation is 12 mm. With reference to Figure 3a, the simulated impedance bandwidth is covered from 1.9 GHz to 2.58 GHz with |S11| below −10 dB, and the 3-dB AR bandwidth is from 2.17 GHz to 2.57 GHz. Both the impedance bandwidth and AR bandwidth coincide with each other in the ISM band of 2.4–2.48 GHz. As depicted in Figure 3b, the proposed antenna has a peak gain of –32.8 dBi at 2.4 GHz. In the xz- and yz- planes, the left-handed circular polarization (LHCP) patterns of the proposed antenna occupy the main radiation component in the main radiation direction, and its cross-polarization discrimination is about 16 dB.

2.2. Operating Mechanism

To better understand the operating principle for realizing miniaturization and circular polarization, the antenna topologies are evolving from Case 1 to Case 5, as illustrated in Figure 4. The corresponding simulated results in different cases are shown in Figure 5. Initially, the antenna is based on a microstrip patch antenna. It can be seen from Case 1 that the antenna excites the fundamental resonant TM01 mode and resonates at 4 GHz. To lower the resonant frequency of the antenna, two C-shaped open slots are introduced along the diagonal of the patch in Case 2, extending the effective paths of the current. Hence, the resonant frequency of TM01 mode is shifted to 2.3 GHz, exciting another resonance at 2.9 GHz. In addition, a C-shaped open slot is further introduced in the upper right corner in Case 3 to split orthogonal degenerate modes TM01 (2.16 GHz) and TM10 (2.42 GHz). In Case 4, the impedance of the resonance at the upper frequency is further matched and the resonant frequency is reduced by adding another C-shaped open slot in the lower-left corner, thus expanding the impedance bandwidth of the antenna.
As can be seen from the electric field distributions in Figure 6, the resonant frequencies of f1 and f2 are orthogonal degenerate modes TM01 and TM10, respectively, and the higher resonant frequency of f3 is TM11 mode. By loading a rectangular slot truncated diagonally in the lower right C-shaped open slot of Case 5, the CP purity of the antenna is improved and the phase difference of TM01 and TM10 is approaching 90° for CP realization, which generates an AR minimum of fAR1. Compared with the antenna in Case 4, the antenna in Case 5 can further reduce the AR to less than 3 dB in the desired band. In addition, the current in TM11 mode (2.5 GHz) is also rotated on the patch surface due to the introduction of four C-shaped open slots and the approximately symmetric square structure, as verified in Figure 7. The current direction within a period of t = 0T, T/4, T/2, and 3T/4 changes clockwise in TM11 mode, indicating that the proposed antenna has LHCP characteristics. Due to the fact that another AR minimum of fAR2 is generated, the AR bandwidth of the proposed antenna is expanded.

2.3. Parametric Analysis

To verify the operating mechanism and optimize the antenna performance, some parameters are further analyzed.
  • Variations in the dimension (w4) of the diagonally truncated rectangular slot: The effects of the dimension w4 of the rectangular slot truncated diagonally on the impedance matching and AR are shown in Figure 8. The CP purity of the proposed antenna is improved by the rectangular slot truncated diagonally, and the change of w4 is mainly related to the phase differences between the orthogonal degenerate modes TM01 and TM10, which have a great effect on fAR1. The w4 also has little effect on the S11 of the proposed antenna. According to Figure 8, to make the AR less than 3 dB in the desired band, the dimension w4 of the rectangular slot truncated diagonally is selected as 0.55 mm.
2.
Variations in the width (w1) of C-shaped slots: The frequencies of three resonant modes are tuned by the width w1 of C-shaped slots in Figure 9. The introduction of four C-shaped slots enables the antenna to excite multiple resonant modes and achieve wide impedance bandwidth. With reference to Figure 9, the increase in the width w1 can extend the current path on the radiation patch; therefore, the resonant frequencies and AR can be shifted to the lower band. To make the bandwidth of the proposed antenna cover the desired band and maintain good AR performance, the width w1 is selected as 0.28 mm.
3.
Variations in the opening position s1 of the upper left C-shaped slots: Since the opening position s1 of the upper left C-shaped slots is close to the coaxial feed, the variation of s1 can have an impact on the performance of the proposed antenna. The effects of the opening position s1 on the impedance matching and AR are shown in Figure 10. As seen in the figure, in order to make the AR bandwidth have good polarization purity, the opening position s1 is selected as 2.03 mm.

2.4. Safety Consideration

The analysis of the SAR distribution is necessary to guarantee that the proposed antenna meet the requirements regulated by IEEE/ANSI. In theory [22], the implanted antenna has dual characteristics (i.e., if the antenna radiates electromagnetic (EM) waves strongly in one direction, it receives EM waves strongly in the same direction). For convenience, in the SAR calculation, the proposed antenna works as a transmitter instead of a wireless power receiver, radiating EM waves to the outside. When the input power of the proposed antenna is assumed to be 1 W, the maximum 10 g averaged SAR with an input power of 1 W at 2.45 GHz is illustrated in Figure 11, when the proposed antenna is implanted into the arm of the Hugo phantom. According to IEEE C95.1-2005 standard [23], the SAR for 10 g tissue should be less than 2 W/Kg. Through numerical computation, it can be inferred that the maximum input power satisfying the safety regulation should be less than 28 mW for radiation safety.

2.5. Antenna Measurement

As shown in Figure 12, to validate the numerical performance of the proposed antenna, a prototype was fabricated and measured in fresh pork. Due to the fact that the electrical characteristics of pork and human tissues are very close, it is suitable for measuring the performance of implantable antennas. The proposed antenna was implanted in the muscle similar to the setup in the simulation. As shown in Figure 13, the measured impedance bandwidth is 33.2% (1.96–2.74 GHz). There is little difference between the results of simulation and measurement mainly due to the fabrication tolerance (e.g., the superstrate and the patch were not tightly bonded in the fabrication, and there could be some gaps between the implanted antenna and the pork) and the different electrical characteristics between the numerical phantom and fresh pork.
Furthermore, a linearly polarized dipole is employed as an external receiving antenna to evaluate the CP performance of the proposed antenna. As shown in Figure 13, the |S21| between the dipole and the proposed implantable antenna was measured at the different azimuth angles, such as 0°, 45°, 90°, and 135°. The distance between the dipole and the implanted antenna is 200 mm. The measured fluctuation degree of |S21| is within 3 dB in the ISM band of 2.4–2.48 GHz, which verifies that the proposed antenna has a high CP purity.

3. Rectenna Design

3.1. Rectifier Design

In the microwave wireless power transfer of IMDs, the RF power received via the implantable antenna needs to be converted into DC power through a rectifier circuit. To obtain a higher output DC voltage, the voltage doubled rectifier is adopted. As illustrated in Figure 14, the rectifier circuit consists of an impedance matching network, a voltage doubled rectifier, and a load.
Lumped components are welded in the circuit to maintain a compact size. Therefore, the rectifier circuit can be integrated under the proposed antenna. The antenna is directly connected to the rectifier circuit to form a rectenna. As shown in Figure 15, the received RF power from the proposed antenna is input into the rectifier circuit through a via, then a DC voltage is output to the load resistor. The source impedance of the proposed rectifier circuit is set as 50 Ω, integrating the proposed antenna and the circuit without impedance mismatch. The effect of adding the rectifier layer on the proposed antenna is illustrated in Figure 16. Owing to the fact that the equivalent permittivity around the proposed antenna decreases after adding the rectifier substrate layer, the resonant frequencies shift to a higher frequency band. Nevertheless, the proposed antenna can maintain good performance.
The simulated output DC voltage and efficiency of the rectifier are demonstrated in Figure 17. With the low input power of –15 dBm, –10 dBm, and –5 dBm, the conversion efficiency can reach 21%, 32%, and 40%, respectively. In the measurement, the conversion efficiency can be obtained by measuring the output DC voltage with a voltmeter at different input power. As can be seen from Figure 16, the measured efficiency is a little lower than that of the simulation. The main reason is that the parasitic parameter effect of lumped elements at high frequency is more significant, and it is easy to deviate from the ideal frequency characteristic.

3.2. Wireless Power Transfer

The prototype of the proposed rectenna, which acts as the receiving part of the microwave WPT system, is demonstrated in Figure 18a. In the RF energy harvesting system, the closer the distance between transmitting and receiving antennas, the higher the power transmission efficiency is. However, the electromagnetic radiation may affect health and safety as the antenna is in the proximity of the human body. Hence, the maximum permissible exposure (MPE) needs to be taken into consideration [24]. According to the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) standard, 10-W/m2 MPE should be followed at 2.4 GHz for uncontrolled exposure to an intentional radiator. The power flux density at a distance of x from the RF power source can be evaluated as
S ( x ) = E I R P 4 π x 2 10   W / m 2
It can be obtained that under the restriction of FCC standard for equivalent isotropically radiated power (EIRP), the minimum distance x of the transceiver antennas is 178 mm. Therefore, the distance of transmitting and receiving antennas in practical measurement is selected as 200 mm under safety considerations. The measurement setup of wireless power transfer is depicted in Figure 18b. An RF signal generator is employed to generate an analog signal with a frequency of 2.4 GHz and a power of 25 dBm, which is fed into a panel antenna with a gain of 9 dBi. The RF power can be received by the proposed rectenna implanted in the fresh pork from the panel antenna and then the DC power can be converted by the rectifier circuit. As shown in Figure 18b, the DC voltage output by the proposed implantable rectenna can be measured by the voltmeter as 63.7 mV. Note that since the transmitting antenna is a linearly polarized panel antenna, there is a 3-dB polarization mismatch loss between the transmitting antenna and the proposed rectenna. Here, the available linearly polarized panel antenna is employed for convenience, and a higher output DC voltage and efficiency can be obtained by using CP transmitting antennas in practical applications.
Furthermore, the DC voltage output by the proposed rectenna and the power transmission efficiency of the system under different transmitting power can be tested in Figure 19. The power transmission efficiency of the whole system is low because of the high loss of receiving antenna implanted in biological tissues and the high loss of path. The higher the transmitting power, the higher the output DC voltage and transmission efficiency could be. Although the allowed EIRP under FCC rules is 36 dBm in the ISM-Bands, the transmitting power also needs to be limited. And the EIRP is ~34 dBm in the measurement, which satisfies the FCC standard.

4. Conclusions

A wideband circularly polarized implantable rectenna for microwave WPT has been presented. The comparison with previous CP implantable antennas is listed in Table 2. Although the antenna in [25] has high gain, its AR bandwidth is narrow, which makes the antenna sensitive to frequency deviation. Compared with the antennas in [20] and [25], the proposed CP antenna achieves wider impedance bandwidth and AR bandwidth while maintaining a compact size. Wide bandwidth allows antennas to collect RF power from multiple frequencies in the microwave WPT system. The performance of the proposed implantable rectenna and the power transfer system was tested under safety considerations. With wide bandwidth and compact size, the proposed implantable rectenna is suitable for microwave WPT in biomedical devices.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, X.L.; methodology, C.X.; software, C.X.; validation, Y.F., C.X.; formal analysis, C.X.; investigation, Y.F., C.X.; resources, X.L.; data curation, Y.F.; writing—original draft preparation, C.X., X.L.; writing—review and editing, Y.F.; visualization, Y.F.; supervision, X.L.; project administration, X.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported in part by the Science and Technology Planning Project of Guangdong Province under Grant 2015B010101006, 2014A010103-014, 2017xm057, and in part by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant 61372008.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to potential patent application.

Acknowledgments

The authors would also like to thank the anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments and suggestions in improving the quality of this paper.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Panescu, D. Emerging technologies: Wireless communication systems for implantable medical devices. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Mag. 2008, 27, 96–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Acha, M.R.; Soifer, E.; Hasin, T. Cardiac Implantable Electronic Miniaturized and Micro Devices. Micromachines 2020, 11, 902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Charthad, J.; Chang, T.C.; Liu, Z.; Sawaby, A.; Weber, M.J.; Baker, S.; Gore, F.; Felt, S.A.; Arbabian, A. A mm-Sized Wireless Implantable Device for Electrical Stimulation of Peripheral Nerves. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Circuits Syst. 2018, 12, 257–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Benken, A.; Gianchandani, Y. Passive Wireless Pressure Sensing for Gastric Manometry. Micromachines 2019, 10, 868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Ben Amar, A.; Kouki, A.B.; Cao, H. Power Approaches for Implantable Medical Devices. Sensors 2015, 15, 28889–28914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Rasouli, M.; Phee, L.S.J. Energy sources and their development for application in medical devices. Expert Rev. Med. Devices 2010, 7, 693–709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Agarwal, K.; Jegadeesan, R.; Guo, Y.-X.; Thakor, N.V. Wireless Power Transfer Strategies for Implantable Bioelectronics. IEEE Rev. Biomed. Eng. 2017, 10, 136–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Khan, M.W.A.; Bjorninen, T.; Sydänheimo, L.; Ukkonen, L. Characterization of Two-Turns External Loop Antenna with Magnetic Core for Efficient Wireless Powering of Cortical Implants. IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett. 2015, 15, 1410–1413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Liu, Z.; Zhong, Z.; Guo, Y.-X. In vivo high-efficiency wireless power transfer with multi-sine excitation. IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech. 2017, 65, 3530–3540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Machnoor, M.; Rodríguez, E.S.G.; Kosta, P.; Stang, J.; Lazzi, G. Analysis and design of a 3-coil wireless power transmission system for biomedical applications. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 2019, 67, 5012–5024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Huang, F.-J.; Lee, C.-M.; Chang, C.-L.; Chen, L.-K.; Yo, T.-C.; Luo, C.-H. Rectenna Application of Miniaturized Implantable Antenna Design for Triple-Band Biotelemetry Communication. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 2011, 59, 2646–2653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Liu, C.; Guo, Y.X.; Sun, H.; Xiao, S. Design and Safety Considerations of an Implantable Rectenna for Far-Field Wireless Power Transfer. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 2014, 62, 5798–5806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Bakogianni, S.; Koulouridis, S. A dual-band implantable rectenna for wireless data and power support at sub-GHz region. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 2019, 67, 6800–6810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. DeLong, B.J.; Kiourti, A.; Volakis, J.L. A radiating near-field patch rectenna for wireless power transfer to medical implants at 2.4 GHz. IEEE J. Electromag. RF Microw. Med. Bio. 2018, 2, 64–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Shaw, T.; Mitra, D. Metasurface-based radiative near-field wireless power transfer system for implantable medical devices. IET Microw. Antennas Propag. 2019, 13, 1974–1982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Liu, C.; Guo, Y.-X.; Xiao, S. Capacitively loaded circularly polarized implantable patch antenna for ISM band biomedical applications. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 2014, 62, 2407–2417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Xu, L.-J.; Guo, Y.-X.; Wu, W. Miniaturized Circularly Polarized Loop Antenna for Biomedical Applications. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 2015, 63, 922–930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Liu, X.Y.; Wu, Z.T.; Fan, Y.; Tentzeris, E.M. A Miniaturized CSRR Loaded Wide-Beamwidth Circularly Polarized Implantable Antenna for Subcutaneous Real-Time Glucose Monitoring. IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett. 2016, 16, 577–580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Yang, Z.-J.; Zhu, L.; Xiao, S. An Implantable Wideband Circularly Polarized Microstrip Patch Antenna via Two Pairs of Degenerate Modes. IEEE Access 2018, 7, 4239–4247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Liu, C.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, X. Circularly Polarized Implantable Antenna for 915 MHz ISM-Band Far-Field Wireless Power Transmission. IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett. 2018, 17, 373–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Gabriel, S.; Lau, R.W.; Gabriel, C. The dielectric properties of biological tissues: II. Measurements in the frequency range 10 Hz to 20 GHz. Phys. Med. Biol. 1996, 41, 2251–2269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. IEEE Standard C95.1-2005; IEEE Standard for Safety Levels with Respect to Human Exposure to Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields, 3 kHz to 300 GHz. IEEE: Piscataway Township, NJ, USA, 2005.
  23. Bercich, R.A.; Duffy, D.R.; Irazoqui, P.P. Far-Field RF Powering of Implantable Devices: Safety Considerations. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 2013, 60, 2107–2112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Yang, Z.-J.; Zhu, L.; Xiao, S. An Implantable Circularly Polarized Patch Antenna Design for Pacemaker Monitoring Based on Quality Factor Analysis. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 2018, 66, 5180–5192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Xia, Z.; Li, H.; Lee, Z.; Xiao, S.; Shao, W.; Ding, X.; Yang, X. A wideband circularly polarized implantable patch antenna for ISM band biomedical applications. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 2020, 68, 2399–2404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Geometry of the proposed implantable antenna.
Figure 1. Geometry of the proposed implantable antenna.
Micromachines 13 00121 g001
Figure 2. Simulation environment of the three-layer phantom model.
Figure 2. Simulation environment of the three-layer phantom model.
Micromachines 13 00121 g002
Figure 3. Simulated results of the proposed antenna: (a)|S11| and axial ratio, (b) LHCP and RHCP radiation patterns at 2.4 GHz.
Figure 3. Simulated results of the proposed antenna: (a)|S11| and axial ratio, (b) LHCP and RHCP radiation patterns at 2.4 GHz.
Micromachines 13 00121 g003
Figure 4. Evolution of the proposed antenna topology: (a) Case 1, (b) Case 2, (c) Case 3, (d) Case 4, and (e) Case 5.
Figure 4. Evolution of the proposed antenna topology: (a) Case 1, (b) Case 2, (c) Case 3, (d) Case 4, and (e) Case 5.
Micromachines 13 00121 g004
Figure 5. Simulated results of a different case: (a) |S11| and (b) Axial ratio.
Figure 5. Simulated results of a different case: (a) |S11| and (b) Axial ratio.
Micromachines 13 00121 g005
Figure 6. Electric field distributions of the proposed antenna: (a) f1 (2 GHz), (b) f2 (2.26 GHz) and (c) f3 (2.5 GHz).
Figure 6. Electric field distributions of the proposed antenna: (a) f1 (2 GHz), (b) f2 (2.26 GHz) and (c) f3 (2.5 GHz).
Micromachines 13 00121 g006
Figure 7. Current distributions of the proposed antenna: (a) t = 0T, (b) t = T/4, (c) t = T/2 and (d) t = 3T/4.
Figure 7. Current distributions of the proposed antenna: (a) t = 0T, (b) t = T/4, (c) t = T/2 and (d) t = 3T/4.
Micromachines 13 00121 g007
Figure 8. Effects of the dimension w4 on the antenna: (a) |S11| and (b) AR.
Figure 8. Effects of the dimension w4 on the antenna: (a) |S11| and (b) AR.
Micromachines 13 00121 g008
Figure 9. Effects of the dimension w1 on the antenna: (a) |S11| and (b) AR.
Figure 9. Effects of the dimension w1 on the antenna: (a) |S11| and (b) AR.
Micromachines 13 00121 g009
Figure 10. Effects of the dimension s1 on the antenna: (a) |S11| and (b) AR.
Figure 10. Effects of the dimension s1 on the antenna: (a) |S11| and (b) AR.
Micromachines 13 00121 g010
Figure 11. A total of 10 g of tissue is used for simulated SAR distribution with an input power of 1 W and an implant muscle depth of 4 mm at 2.45 GHz: (a) upper arm model, (b) cross section of the upper arm, and (c) SAR distribution.
Figure 11. A total of 10 g of tissue is used for simulated SAR distribution with an input power of 1 W and an implant muscle depth of 4 mm at 2.45 GHz: (a) upper arm model, (b) cross section of the upper arm, and (c) SAR distribution.
Micromachines 13 00121 g011
Figure 12. Photograph of the measurement setup with the fabricated implantable CP antenna.
Figure 12. Photograph of the measurement setup with the fabricated implantable CP antenna.
Micromachines 13 00121 g012
Figure 13. Measured results of the proposed antenna.
Figure 13. Measured results of the proposed antenna.
Micromachines 13 00121 g013
Figure 14. Schematic of the rectifier circuit: L1 = 2.7 nH, L2 = 1.8 nH, C1 = 100 pF, C2 = 100 pF, and RL = 2 kΩ.
Figure 14. Schematic of the rectifier circuit: L1 = 2.7 nH, L2 = 1.8 nH, C1 = 100 pF, C2 = 100 pF, and RL = 2 kΩ.
Micromachines 13 00121 g014
Figure 15. Configuration for integrating the rectifier circuit as a rectenna.
Figure 15. Configuration for integrating the rectifier circuit as a rectenna.
Micromachines 13 00121 g015
Figure 16. Effects of adding the rectifier layer on the proposed antenna: (a) |S11| and (b) AR.
Figure 16. Effects of adding the rectifier layer on the proposed antenna: (a) |S11| and (b) AR.
Micromachines 13 00121 g016
Figure 17. RF-to-DC conversion efficiency and output DC voltage of the rectifier.
Figure 17. RF-to-DC conversion efficiency and output DC voltage of the rectifier.
Micromachines 13 00121 g017
Figure 18. Photograph of measurement setup for wireless power transfer: (a) fabricated implantable rectenna and (b) measurement setup.
Figure 18. Photograph of measurement setup for wireless power transfer: (a) fabricated implantable rectenna and (b) measurement setup.
Micromachines 13 00121 g018
Figure 19. Measured output DC voltage and power transmission efficiency (PTE) of the proposed rectenna at 2.4 GHz.
Figure 19. Measured output DC voltage and power transmission efficiency (PTE) of the proposed rectenna at 2.4 GHz.
Micromachines 13 00121 g019
Table 1. Optimized antenna dimensions (UNIT: mm).
Table 1. Optimized antenna dimensions (UNIT: mm).
ParameterValueParameterValueParameterValue
L7.5w10.28w20.15
w30.7w40.55l12.87
l22.74s12.03s20.56
s30.2s41.22h0.635
Table 2. Performance comparison with previous arts.
Table 2. Performance comparison with previous arts.
Ref.Frequency
(MHz)
Volume (mm3)BandwidthGain (dBi)Implant
Depth
(|S11| < −10 dB)(AR < 3 dB)
[25]2450101637.5%5.3%−15.94 mm
[25]2400121.9721.5%15.8%−333 mm
[20]915153.673.9%1.2%−29.24 mm
This Work240071.430.4%16.9%−32.812 mm
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Xu, C.; Fan, Y.; Liu, X. A Circularly Polarized Implantable Rectenna for Microwave Wireless Power Transfer. Micromachines 2022, 13, 121. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi13010121

AMA Style

Xu C, Fan Y, Liu X. A Circularly Polarized Implantable Rectenna for Microwave Wireless Power Transfer. Micromachines. 2022; 13(1):121. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi13010121

Chicago/Turabian Style

Xu, Chao, Yi Fan, and Xiongying Liu. 2022. "A Circularly Polarized Implantable Rectenna for Microwave Wireless Power Transfer" Micromachines 13, no. 1: 121. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi13010121

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop