In a recently published article, Sifakaki and colleagues [1] conclude that patients with rheumatoid arthritis who receive medical nutrition therapy show orthorexic tendencies (i.e., a pathological preoccupation with healthy, “pure” eating that is associated with restrictive dietary patterns and nutritional deficiencies). This commentary argues that this conclusion is unwarranted because the authors used the ORTO-15 questionnaire [2] to assess orthorexic tendencies. However, numerous researchers have strongly advised against using the ORTO-15 questionnaire because it is psychometrically unsound, as it possesses low reliability and some items lack face validity [3,4,5,6,7].
The original scoring procedure of the ORTO-15 questionnaire [2] is quite peculiar; while all items are answered on a four-point scale with 1 = always, 2 = often, 3 = sometimes, and 4 = never, responses to four items then need to be inversely coded (i.e., 1 = 4, 2 = 3, 3 = 2, and 4 = 1), and two items are recoded as 2 = always, 4 = often, 3 = sometimes, and 1 = never. Sifakaki and colleagues [1] state that “the total score is calculated by summing the scores of the 15 individual items” (p. 3). However, this is obviously not how the questionnaire is scored according to Donini and colleagues [2]. Yet, irrespective of whether the authors used the scoring procedure proposed by Donini and colleagues [2] or summed up the raw item responses, neither of these procedures result in meaningful scores [5]. Furthermore, the authors used a Greek version of the ORTO-15 questionnaire, citing an article by Gkiouras and colleagues [8], in which it is explicitly stated that a one-factor model had poor model fit, with some items having factor loadings close to zero, indicating that the sum score of all 15 items should not be calculated, let alone interpreted.
This commentary piece is not the first advising against the use of the ORTO-15 questionnaire. In fact, this has been advised for many years now [3,4,5,6,7] and other measures for assessing orthorexic tendencies have been developed that are psychometrically sound [9]. While some of these alternatives may have limited suitability in clinical practice as they have more items than the ORTO-15 questionnaire and include subscales (e.g., the Eating Habits Questionnaire, the Teruel Orthorexia Scale, or the Orthorexia Nervosa Inventory), others, such as the Düsseldorf Orthorexia Scale [10], are well suited to clinical practice because of their briefness (10 Items), ease of scoring (all items are simply summed to a total score without the need to inversely code the items), and suggested cut-off scores. Because of the general issues related to the ORTO-15 questionnaire and the version used in the study by Sifakaki and colleagues, in particular, scores of this scale should not be interpreted and, therefore, it should not be concluded that patients with rheumatoid arthritis who receive medical nutrition therapy show orthorexic tendencies.
Conflicts of Interest
The author declares that there is no conflict of interest.
References
- Sifakaki, M.; Gkiouras, K.; Lindqvist, H.M.; Marakis, G.; Petropoulou, A.; Donini, L.M.; Bogdanos, D.P.; Grammatikopoulou, M.G. Orthorexia Nervosa Practices in Rheumatoid Arthritis: The DORA Study. Nutrients 2023, 15, 713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Donini, L.M.; Marsili, D.; Graziani, M.P.; Imbriale, M.; Cannella, C. Orthorexia nervosa: Validation of a diagnosis questionnaire. Eat. Weight Disord. 2005, 10, e28–e32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Missbach, B.; Dunn, T.M.; König, J.S. We need new tools to assess Orthorexia Nervosa. A commentary on “Prevalence of Orthorexia Nervosa among College Students Based on Bratman’s Test and Associated Tendencies”. Appetite 2017, 108, 521–524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Missbach, B.; Hinterbuchinger, B.; Dreiseitl, V.; Zellhofer, S.; Kurz, C.; König, J. When eating right, is measured wrong! A validation and critical examination of the ORTO-15 questionnaire in German. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0135772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Meule, A.; Holzapfel, C.; Brandl, B.; Greetfeld, M.; Hessler-Kaufmann, J.B.; Skurk, T.; Quadflieg, N.; Schlegl, S.; Hauner, H.; Voderholzer, U. Measuring orthorexia nervosa: A comparison of four self-report questionnaires. Appetite 2020, 146, 104512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Roncero, M.; Barrada, J.R.; Perpiñá, C. Measuring Orthorexia Nervosa: Psychometric Limitations of the ORTO-15. Span. J. Psychol. 2017, 20, E41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rogoza, R.; Donini, L.M. Introducing ORTO-R: A revision of ORTO-15. Eat. Weight Disord. 2021, 26, 887–895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gkiouras, K.; Grammatikopoulou, M.G.; Tsaliki, T.; Ntwali, L.; Nigdelis, M.P.; Gerontidis, A.; Taousani, E.; Tzimos, C.; Rogoza, R.; Bogdanos, D.P.; et al. Orthorexia nervosa: Replication and validation of the ORTO questionnaires translated into Greek in a survey of 848 Greek individuals. Hormones 2022, 21, 251–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Oberle, C.D.; Noebel, N.A. Assessment of Orthorexia Nervosa. In Assessment of Eating Behavior; Meule, A., Ed.; Hogrefe: Göttingen, Germany, 2023. [Google Scholar]
- Barthels, F.; Meyer, F.; Pietrowsky, R. Die Düsseldorfer Orthorexie Skala–Konstruktion und Evaluation eines Fragebogens zur Erfassung ortho-rektischen Ernährungsverhaltens [Duesseldorf Orthorexia Scale–Construction and evaluation of a questionnaire measuring orthorexic eating behavior]. Z. Klin. Psychol. Psychother. 2015, 44, 97–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the author. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).