Next Article in Journal
Comparative Assessment of Eight Satellite Precipitation Products over the Complex Terrain of the Lower Yarlung Zangpo Basin: Performance Evaluation and Topographic Influence Analysis
Previous Article in Journal
A Systematic Review of Methodological Advances in Glacier-Velocity Retrieval with an Emphasis on Debris-Covered Glaciers
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Geospatial and Deep Learning Approaches for Modeling Floodwater Depth in Urbanized Areas

Built Environment Department, College of Science and Technology, North Carolina A&T State University, 1601 E Market St., Greensboro, NC 27411, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Remote Sens. 2026, 18(1), 60; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs18010060
Submission received: 28 October 2025 / Revised: 13 December 2025 / Accepted: 15 December 2025 / Published: 24 December 2025

Abstract

Floodwater depth estimation is essential for disaster response and infrastructure planning yet remains challenging in urban areas with limited gage and hydrological data. This study presents a deep learning-based framework grounded in the hydrostatic equilibrium principle to estimate flood depth using a remote sensing approach. A series of ResNet architectures were trained and evaluated under two different scenarios: (a) a baseline model input using LiDAR-derived DTM and flood extent, and (b) an enhanced model incorporating additional terrain features such as slope, curvature, and Topographic Wetness Index (TWI). The results demonstrate that ResNet18 outperformed deeper models, achieving an RMSE of 0.71 ft, Huber Loss of 0.28 ft, MAE of 0.23 ft, SSIM of approximately 99% and R-Squared of approximately 94% under the enhanced scenario. Inclusion of terrain predictors led to significant improvements in prediction accuracy and spatial coherence. They improved Huber Loss by 28%, RMSE by 13%, and MAE by 21%. However, when applied to an unseen peri-urban catchment, model performance declined (RMSE = 1.95 ft), mainly due to limited and temporally misaligned ground truth data, and differences in spatial characteristics. Despite these limitations, ResNet18 generalizes well, mapping flood depth in unseen catchments, and demonstrates the potential for rapid assessments in data-scarce regions.
Keywords: flood depth; ResNet; flood management; remote sensing; urban assets flood depth; ResNet; flood management; remote sensing; urban assets
Graphical Abstract

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Blay, J.; Hashemi-Beni, L. Geospatial and Deep Learning Approaches for Modeling Floodwater Depth in Urbanized Areas. Remote Sens. 2026, 18, 60. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs18010060

AMA Style

Blay J, Hashemi-Beni L. Geospatial and Deep Learning Approaches for Modeling Floodwater Depth in Urbanized Areas. Remote Sensing. 2026; 18(1):60. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs18010060

Chicago/Turabian Style

Blay, Jeffrey, and Leila Hashemi-Beni. 2026. "Geospatial and Deep Learning Approaches for Modeling Floodwater Depth in Urbanized Areas" Remote Sensing 18, no. 1: 60. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs18010060

APA Style

Blay, J., & Hashemi-Beni, L. (2026). Geospatial and Deep Learning Approaches for Modeling Floodwater Depth in Urbanized Areas. Remote Sensing, 18(1), 60. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs18010060

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop