Next Article in Journal
GD-Det: Low-Data Object Detection in Foggy Scenarios for Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Imagery Using Re-Parameterization and Cross-Scale Gather-and-Distribute Mechanisms
Next Article in Special Issue
A 1.8 m Class Pathfinder Raman LIDAR for the Northern Site of the Cherenkov Telescope Array Observatory—Technical Design
Previous Article in Journal
The Spatiotemporal Evolution and Driving Forces of the Urban Heat Island in Shijiazhuang
Previous Article in Special Issue
Radar–Rain Gauge Merging for High-Spatiotemporal-Resolution Rainfall Estimation Using Radial Basis Function Interpolation
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Remote Sensing
Volume 17
Issue 5
10.3390/rs17050782
remotesensing-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
Correction to Remote Sens. 2024, 16(18), 3498.
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Correction

Correction: Berezowski et al. Comparison of Time-Lapse Ground-Penetrating Radar and Electrical Resistivity Tomography Surveys for Detecting Pig (Sus spp.) Cadaver Graves in an Australian Environment. Remote Sens. 2024, 16, 3498

by
Victoria Berezowski
1,2,*,
Xanthé Mallett
1,
Dilan Seckiner
3,
Isabella Crebert
1,
Justin Ellis
1,
Gabriel C. Rau
4 and
Ian Moffat
5
1
School of Law and Justice, College of Human and Social Futures, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW 2300, Australia
2
School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Science, Engineering and Built Environment, Deakin University, Waurn Ponds, VIC 3216, Australia
3
School of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
4
School of Environmental and Life Sciences, College of Engineering, Science, and Environment, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW 2308, Australia
5
Archaeology, College of Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Remote Sens. 2025, 17(5), 782; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17050782
Submission received: 5 February 2025 / Accepted: 10 February 2025 / Published: 24 February 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Remote Sensing: 15th Anniversary)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes
In the original publication [1], the images of Figure 7 and Figure 9 were switched on the web page, but were correct in the PDF. The corrected Figure 7 and Figure 9 appear below. The authors state that the scientific conclusions are unaffected. This correction was approved by the Academic Editor. The original publication has also been updated.

Reference

  1. Berezowski, V.; Mallett, X.; Seckiner, D.; Crebert, I.; Ellis, J.; Rau, G.C.; Moffat, I. Comparison of Time-Lapse Ground-Penetrating Radar and Electrical Resistivity Tomography Surveys for Detecting Pig (Sus spp.) Cadaver Graves in an Australian Environment. Remote Sens. 2024, 16, 3498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Remotesensing 17 00782 g007
Figure 7. Resistivity difference plots between the pre-burial and all post-burial surveys. The immediate post-burial survey (a), as well as the one-month (b), eight-month (c), fourteen-month (d), and twenty-month (e) post-burial surveys. The red denotes a resistivity increase, and the blue denotes a resistivity decrease. The graves are denoted by the black rectangles; 1 is PS1, 2 is PM1, and 3 is PS2. Dipole-Dipole data. Graphs generated in Python.
Figure 7. Resistivity difference plots between the pre-burial and all post-burial surveys. The immediate post-burial survey (a), as well as the one-month (b), eight-month (c), fourteen-month (d), and twenty-month (e) post-burial surveys. The red denotes a resistivity increase, and the blue denotes a resistivity decrease. The graves are denoted by the black rectangles; 1 is PS1, 2 is PM1, and 3 is PS2. Dipole-Dipole data. Graphs generated in Python.
Remotesensing 17 00782 g007
Remotesensing 17 00782 g009
Figure 9. Resistivity difference plots between consecutive surveys. Post- and pre-burial (a), one-month and post-burial (b), eight- and one-month (c), fourteen- and eight-month (d), and twenty- and fourteen-month (e) surveys. The red denotes a resistivity increase, and the blue denotes a resistivity decrease. The graves are denoted by the black rectangles; 1 is PS1, 2 is PM1, and 3 is PS2. Dipole-Dipole data. Graphs generated in Python.
Figure 9. Resistivity difference plots between consecutive surveys. Post- and pre-burial (a), one-month and post-burial (b), eight- and one-month (c), fourteen- and eight-month (d), and twenty- and fourteen-month (e) surveys. The red denotes a resistivity increase, and the blue denotes a resistivity decrease. The graves are denoted by the black rectangles; 1 is PS1, 2 is PM1, and 3 is PS2. Dipole-Dipole data. Graphs generated in Python.
Remotesensing 17 00782 g009
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Berezowski, V.; Mallett, X.; Seckiner, D.; Crebert, I.; Ellis, J.; Rau, G.C.; Moffat, I. Correction: Berezowski et al. Comparison of Time-Lapse Ground-Penetrating Radar and Electrical Resistivity Tomography Surveys for Detecting Pig (Sus spp.) Cadaver Graves in an Australian Environment. Remote Sens. 2024, 16, 3498. Remote Sens. 2025, 17, 782. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17050782

AMA Style

Berezowski V, Mallett X, Seckiner D, Crebert I, Ellis J, Rau GC, Moffat I. Correction: Berezowski et al. Comparison of Time-Lapse Ground-Penetrating Radar and Electrical Resistivity Tomography Surveys for Detecting Pig (Sus spp.) Cadaver Graves in an Australian Environment. Remote Sens. 2024, 16, 3498. Remote Sensing. 2025; 17(5):782. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17050782

Chicago/Turabian Style

Berezowski, Victoria, Xanthé Mallett, Dilan Seckiner, Isabella Crebert, Justin Ellis, Gabriel C. Rau, and Ian Moffat. 2025. "Correction: Berezowski et al. Comparison of Time-Lapse Ground-Penetrating Radar and Electrical Resistivity Tomography Surveys for Detecting Pig (Sus spp.) Cadaver Graves in an Australian Environment. Remote Sens. 2024, 16, 3498" Remote Sensing 17, no. 5: 782. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17050782

APA Style

Berezowski, V., Mallett, X., Seckiner, D., Crebert, I., Ellis, J., Rau, G. C., & Moffat, I. (2025). Correction: Berezowski et al. Comparison of Time-Lapse Ground-Penetrating Radar and Electrical Resistivity Tomography Surveys for Detecting Pig (Sus spp.) Cadaver Graves in an Australian Environment. Remote Sens. 2024, 16, 3498. Remote Sensing, 17(5), 782. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17050782

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop