Skip Content
You are currently on the new version of our website. Access the old version .
SustainabilitySustainability
  • This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
  • Systematic Review
  • Open Access

29 January 2026

Beyond Efficiency: A Systematic Review of Energy Consumption and Carbon Footprint Across the AI Lifecycle

,
and
1
School of Administration, Engineering and Aeronautics (EGEA), Instituto Superior de Educação e Ciências de Lisboa (ISEC Lisboa), Alameda das Linhas de Torres, 179, 1750-142 Lisboa, Portugal
2
MARE—Centro de Ciências do Mar e do Ambiente, Instituto Politécnico de Setúbal (MARE-IPSetúbal), Campus do IPS, Estefanilha, 2910-765 Setúbal, Portugal
3
Applied Physics Department (Optometry Area), Facultade de Óptica e Optometría, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, 15705 Santiago de Compostela, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
This article belongs to the Special Issue Artificial Intelligence for Climate Change Mitigation, Adaptation and Sustainability: Innovative Approaches for a Greener Future

Abstract

The rapid expansion of artificial intelligence (AI) systems has intensified concerns regarding their energy consumption and carbon footprint, raising questions about whether efficiency-focused strategies under the Green AI paradigm are sufficient to ensure system-level environmental sustainability. This study systematically synthesizes empirical evidence on the energy use and carbon emissions of AI systems across their life cycle and develops a conceptual framework to integrate sustainability constraints into AI deployment. A systematic review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA 2020 guidelines and AMSTAR-2 standards, with searches performed in Web of Science, Pubmed and Scopus up to 19 December 2025. Eligible studies quantitatively assessed energy consumption, carbon footprint, greenhouse-gas emissions, or life-cycle impacts associated with AI systems, including training, inference, hardware, and deployment infrastructures. Ten studies met the inclusion criteria. The results show that AI-related environmental impacts are substantial and highly context-dependent, with inference-phase energy demand often matching or exceeding training-related consumption in large-scale deployments. Life-cycle assessments indicate that hardware-related emissions and electricity mix strongly influence total carbon footprints, while efficiency gains are frequently constrained by system-level feedback. These findings suggest that isolated efficiency improvements are insufficient and that sustainable AI requires coordinated, system-level governance embedding energy and carbon constraints into design and operational decision-making.

Article Metrics

Citations

Article Access Statistics

Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.