Remote Sensing of Atmospheric Methane (XCH4) Concentrations over Lake Ecosystems: Seasonal Dynamics and Environmental Drivers in Eğirdir and Burdur Lakes of Türkiye
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Study Area
2.2. Satellite Data
2.3. Methodology Used
2.3.1. XCH4 Retrieval and Calculation of WST, NDCI, and FAI
2.3.2. Statistical Analysis
2.4. Cross-Validation with TCCON Ground-Based Observations
3. Results
3.1. Seasonal Composite XCH4 Maps
3.2. Relationship Between Lake Depth and XCH4
3.3. Relationship Between LULC and XCH4
3.4. Time-Series and Correlation Analysis of XCH4, WST, NDCI, and FAI
3.5. Validation of Sentinel 5P TROPOMI-Derived XCH4 Using TCCON Ground-Based Measurements
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions and Recommendations
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- IPCC. Climate Change 2022: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change; Shukla, P.R., Skea, J., Slade, R., Khourdajie, A.A., Hasija, A., Malley, J., Fradera, R., Belkacemi, M., Lisboa, G., McCollum, D., et al., Eds.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK; New York, NY, USA, 2022. [CrossRef]
- Lan, X.; Thoning, K.W.; Dlugokencky, E.J. Trends in Globally-Averaged CH4, N2O, and SF6 Determined from NOAA Global Monitoring Laboratory Measurements. Version 2026-01. Available online: https://gml.noaa.gov/ccgg/trends_doi.html (accessed on 21 January 2026).
- Kirschke, S.; Bousquet, P.; Ciais, P.; Saunois, M.; Canadell, J.G.; Dlugokencky, E.J.; Bergamaschi, P.; Bergmann, D.; Blake, D.R.; Bruhwiler, L.; et al. Three Decades of Global Methane Sources and Sinks. Nat. Geosci. 2013, 6, 813–823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rosentreter, J.A.; Borges, A.V.; Deemer, B.R.; Holgerson, M.A.; Liu, S.; Song, C.; Melack, J.; Raymond, P.A.; Duarte, C.M.; Allen, G.H.; et al. Half of Global Methane Emissions Come from Highly Variable Aquatic Ecosystem Sources. Nat. Geosci. 2021, 14, 225–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bastviken, D.; Cole, J.; Pace, M.; Tranvik, L. Methane Emissions from Lakes: Dependence of Lake Characteristics, Two Regional Assessments, and a Global Estimate. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 2004, 18, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sieczko, A.K.; Thanh Duc, N.; Schenk, J.; Pajala, G.; Rudberg, D.; Sawakuchi, H.O.; Bastviken, D. Diel Variability of Methane Emissions from Lakes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2020, 117, 21488–21494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sanches, L.F.; Guenet, B.; Marinho, C.C.; Barros, N.; de Assis Esteves, F. Global Regulation of Methane Emission from Natural Lakes. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Johnson, M.S.; Matthews, E.; Du, J.; Genovese, V.; Bastviken, D. Methane Emission from Global Lakes: New Spatiotemporal Data and Observation-Driven Modeling of Methane Dynamics Indicates Lower Emissions. J. Geophys. Res. Biogeosci. 2022, 127, e2022JG006793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bastviken, D.; Johnson, M.S. Future Methane Emissions from Lakes and Reservoirs. Nat. Water 2025, 3, 1397–1410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Berkeley Lab News Center. Berkeley Lab Methane Emissions from Wetlands Increase Significantly over High Latitudes. Available online: https://newscenter.lbl.gov/2024/02/15/methane-emissions-from-wetlands-increase-significantly-over-high-latitudes/ (accessed on 19 June 2025).
- Xiao, Q.; Zhang, M.; Hu, Z.; Gao, Y.; Hu, C.; Liu, C.; Liu, S.; Zhang, Z.; Zhao, J.; Xiao, W.; et al. Spatial Variations of Methane Emission in a Large Shallow Eutrophic Lake in Subtropical Climate. J. Geophys. Res. Biogeosci. 2017, 122, 1597–1614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- DelSontro, T.; Beaulieu, J.J.; Downing, J.A. Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Lakes and Impoundments: Upscaling in the Face of Global Change. Limnol. Oceanogr. Lett. 2018, 3, 64–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, L.; He, K.; Wang, T.; Liu, C.; An, Y.; Zhong, J. Frequent Algal Blooms Dramatically Increase Methane While Decrease Carbon Dioxide in a Shallow Lake Bay. Environ. Pollut. 2022, 312, 120061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wang, J.; Wei, Z.P.; Chu, Y.X.; Tian, G.; He, R. Eutrophic Levels and Algae Growth Increase Emissions of Methane and Volatile Sulfur Compounds from Lakes. Environ. Pollut. 2022, 306, 119435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Li, M.; Peng, C.; Zhu, Q.; Zhou, X.; Yang, G.; Song, X.; Zhang, K. The Significant Contribution of Lake Depth in Regulating Global Lake Diffusive Methane Emissions. Water Res. 2020, 172, 115465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kyzivat, E.D.; Smith, L.C.; Garcia-Tigreros, F.; Huang, C.; Wang, C.; Langhorst, T.; Fayne, J.V.; Harlan, M.E.; Ishitsuka, Y.; Feng, D.; et al. The Importance of Lake Emergent Aquatic Vegetation for Estimating Arctic-Boreal Methane Emissions. J. Geophys. Res. Biogeosci. 2022, 127, e2021JG006635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Patel, L.; Singh, R.; Thottathil, S.D. Land Use Drivers of Riverine Methane Dynamics in a Tropical River Basin, India. Water Res. 2023, 228, 119380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Beaulieu, J.J.; DelSontro, T.; Downing, J.A. Eutrophication Will Increase Methane Emissions from Lakes and Impoundments during the 21st Century. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 1375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schubert, C.J.; Diem, T.; Eugster, W. Methane Emissions from a Small Wind Shielded Lake Determined by Eddy Covariance, Flux Chambers, Anchored Funnels, and Boundary Model Calculations: A Comparison. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2012, 46, 4515–4522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wan, Y.; Chen, F.; Fan, L.; Sun, D.; He, H.; Dai, Y.; Li, L.; Chen, Y. Conversion of Surface CH4 Concentrations from GOSAT Satellite Observations Using XGBoost Algorithm. Atmos. Environ. 2023, 301, 119694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Firatli, E.; Tanik, A.; Musaoglu, N.; Engin, G. A Methodology Developed for Assessing the Potential Drivers of Water Losses in Natural Lakes at Country-Scale: Status of Türkiye. Water Environ. J. 2025, 39, 523–536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Copernicus Sentinel-5 Precursor Mission Status. Available online: https://share.google/2uU2d4iO5eXVAn43u (accessed on 12 January 2026).
- Landsat 8/U.S. Geological Survey. Available online: https://www.usgs.gov/landsat-missions/landsat-8 (accessed on 27 August 2025).
- Mishra, S.; Mishra, D.R. Normalized Difference Chlorophyll Index: A Novel Model for Remote Estimation of Chlorophyll-a Concentration in Turbid Productive Waters. Remote Sens. Environ. 2012, 117, 394–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hu, C. A Novel Ocean Color Index to Detect Floating Algae in the Global Oceans. Remote Sens. Environ. 2009, 113, 2118–2129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Copernicus Sentiwiki S2 Mission. Available online: https://sentiwiki.copernicus.eu/web/s2-mission (accessed on 19 June 2025).
- S5P MPC Product Readme Methane TROPOMI Level 2 Methane Total Column. TROPOMI Level 2 Methane Total Column. 2023. Available online: https://share.google/xrn4nGuZ0vac0vV2q (accessed on 12 January 2026).
- Kumar, B.P.; Babu, K.R.; Anusha, B.N.; Rajasekhar, M. Geo-Environmental Monitoring and Assessment of Land Degradation and Desertification in the Semi-Arid Regions Using Landsat 8 OLI/TIRS, LST, and NDVI Approach. Environ. Chall. 2022, 8, 100578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Makwinja, R.; Inagaki, Y.; Sagawa, T.; Obubu, J.P.; Habineza, E.; Haaziyu, W. Monitoring Trophic Status Using in Situ Data and Sentinel-2 MSI Algorithm: Lesson from Lake Malombe, Malawi. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2022, 30, 29755–29772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Liu, M.; Ling, H.; Wu, D.; Su, X.; Cao, Z. Sentinel-2 and Landsat-8 Observations for Harmful Algae Blooms in a Small Eutrophic Lake. Remote Sens. 2021, 13, 4479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pearson, K., VII. Mathematical Contributions to the Theory of Evolution.—III. Regression, Heredity, and Panmixia. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. A 1896, 187, 253–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- TCCON. Data Archive. Available online: https://tccondata.org/ (accessed on 11 December 2025).
- Sha, M.K.; Langerock, B.; Blavier, J.F.L.; Blumenstock, T.; Borsdorff, T.; Buschmann, M.; Dehn, A.; De Mazière, M.; Deutscher, N.M.; Feist, D.G.; et al. Validation of Methane and Carbon Monoxide from Sentinel-5 Precursor Using TCCON and NDACC-IRWG Stations. Atmos. Meas. Tech. 2021, 14, 6249–6304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lindqvist, H.; Kivimäki, E.; Häkkilä, T.; Tsuruta, A.; Schneising, O.; Buchwitz, M.; Lorente, A.; Martinez Velarte, M.; Borsdorff, T.; Alberti, C.; et al. Evaluation of Sentinel-5P TROPOMI Methane Observations at Northern High Latitudes. Remote Sens. 2024, 16, 2979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Prajesh, P.J.; Ragunath, K.; Gordon, M.; Neethirajan, S. Satellite-Based Seasonal Fingerprinting of Methane Emissions from Canadian Dairy Farms Using Sentinel-5P. Climate 2025, 13, 135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Eğirdir Gölü’nde “Metan Gazı” Yangını | Isparta Haberleri. Yeni Şafak. Available online: https://www.yenisafak.com/gundem/Eğirdir-golunde-metan-gazi-yangini-4639385 (accessed on 11 December 2025). (In Turkish)
- Eğirdir Gölü’nde “metan Gazı” Yangını - Son Dakika Haberleri. Available online: https://www.hurriyet.com.tr/video/egirdir-golunde-metan-gazi-yangini-42506593 (accessed on 11 December 2025). (In Turkish)
- Esri/Sentinel-2 Land Cover Explorer. Available online: https://livingatlas.arcgis.com/landcoverexplorer/#mapCenter=28.71471%2C42.45767%2C6.65741130826159&mode=step&timeExtent=2017%2C2024&year=2024 (accessed on 14 May 2025).
- Kaçikoç, M.; Beyhan, M. Hydrodynamic and Water Quality Modeling of Lake Eğirdir. Clean Soil Air Water 2014, 42, 1573–1582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Duan, H.; Xiao, Q.; Qi, T.; Hu, C.; Zhang, M.; Shen, M.; Hu, Z.; Wang, W.; Xiao, W.; Qiu, Y.; et al. Quantification of Diffusive Methane Emissions from a Large Eutrophic Lake with Satellite Imagery. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2023, 57, 13520–13529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bartosiewicz, M.; Maranger, R.; Przytulska, A.; Laurion, I. Effects of Phytoplankton Blooms on Fluxes and Emissions of Greenhouse Gases in a Eutrophic Lake. Water Res. 2021, 196, 116985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Xiao, Q.; Duan, H.; Qin, B.; Hu, Z.; Zhang, M.; Qi, T.; Lee, X. Eutrophication and Temperature Drive Large Variability in Carbon Dioxide from China’s Lake Taihu. Limnol. Oceanogr. 2022, 67, 379–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sepulveda-Jauregui, A.; Hoyos-Santillan, J.; Martinez-Cruz, K.; Walter Anthony, K.M.; Casper, P.; Belmonte-Izquierdo, Y.; Thalasso, F. Eutrophication Exacerbates the Impact of Climate Warming on Lake Methane Emission. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 636, 411–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jansen, J.; Thornton, B.F.; Wik, M.; MacIntyre, S.; Crill, P.M. Temperature Proxies as a Solution to Biased Sampling of Lake Methane Emissions. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2020, 47, e2020GL088647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, J.; Li, W.; Xie, H.; Wang, Y.; Wang, L.; Hu, F. Long-Term Trends and Spatiotemporal Variations in Atmospheric XCH4 over China Utilizing Satellite Observations. Atmosphere 2022, 13, 525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nisbet, E.G.; Manning, M.R.; Dlugokencky, E.J.; Fisher, R.E.; Lowry, D.; Michel, S.E.; Myhre, C.L.; Platt, S.M.; Allen, G.; Bousquet, P.; et al. Very Strong Atmospheric Methane Growth in the 4 Years 2014–2017: Implications for the Paris Agreement. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 2019, 33, 318–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abujayyab, S.K.M.; Almotairi, K.H.; Alswaitti, M.; Amr, S.S.A.; Alkarkhi, A.F.M.; Taşoğlu, E.; Hussein, A.M. Effects of Meteorological Parameters on Surface Water Loss in Burdur Lake, Turkey over 34 Years Landsat Google Earth Engine Time-Series. Land 2021, 10, 1301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Paranaíba, J.R.; Aben, R.; Barros, N.; Quadra, G.; Linkhorst, A.; Amado, A.M.; Brothers, S.; Catalán, N.; Condon, J.; Finlayson, C.M.; et al. Cross-Continental Importance of CH4 Emissions from Dry Inland-Waters. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 814, 151925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Encinas Fernández, J.; Peeters, F.; Hofmann, H. On the Methane Paradox: Transport from Shallow Water Zones Rather than in Situ Methanogenesis Is the Major Source of CH4 in the Open Surface Water of Lakes. J. Geophys. Res. Biogeosci. 2016, 121, 2717–2726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Smith, P.; Reay, D.; Smith, J. Agricultural Methane Emissions and the Potential Formitigation. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 2021, 379, 20200451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Smith, K.A. The Impact of Agriculture and Other Land Uses on Emissions of Methane and Nitrous and Nitric Oxides. Environ. Sci. 2005, 2, 101–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kokal, A.T.; Kacikoc, M.; Musaoglu, N.; Tanik, A. Remote Sensing Application in Water Quality of Lake Burdur, Türkiye. Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens. 2024, 90, 85–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kacikoc, M.; Mesta, B.; Karaaslan, Y. Evaluating Changes in Water Levels during Periods of Normal Flow and Drought with a Specific Emphasis on Water Withdrawal. J. Water Clim. Change 2025, 16, 1073–1097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xue, K.; Ma, R.; Cao, Z.; Shen, M.; Hu, M.; Xiong, J. Monitoring Fractional Floating Algae Cover Over Eutrophic Lakes Using Multisensor Satellite Images: MODIS, VIIRS, GOCI, and OLCI. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 2022, 60, 4211715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liang, X.; Zhang, X.; Sun, Q.; He, C.; Chen, X.; Liu, X.; Chen, Z. The Role of Filamentous Algae Spirogyra Spp. in Methane Production and Emissions in Streams. Aquat. Sci. 2015, 78, 227–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hilt, S.; Grossart, H.P.; McGinnis, D.F.; Keppler, F. Potential Role of Submerged Macrophytes for Oxic Methane Production in Aquatic Ecosystems. Limnol. Oceanogr. 2022, 67, S76–S88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]







| Lake Eğirdir | ||
| Depth Class (m) | Mean XCH4 (ppb) | Sample Size (S5P Pixels, n) |
| 0–5 | 1862 | 146 |
| 5–10 | 1856 | 274 |
| >10 | 1826 | 248 |
| Lake Burdur | ||
| Depth Class (m) | Mean XCH4 (ppb) | Sample Size (S5P Pixels, n) |
| 0–20 | 1898 | 35 |
| 20–40 | 1893 | 40 |
| >40 | 1885 | 78 |
| Basin Border (km2) | 1 km Buffer Zone (km2) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Classes | Eğirdir | % | Burdur | % | Eğirdir | Burdur |
| Forestry | 260.4 | 8.66 | 397.5 | 13.0 | 18.7 | 1.0 |
| Agricultural Area | 690.5 | 22.95 | 662.1 | 21.6 | 35.4 | 14.5 |
| Built Area | 85.8 | 2.85 | 140.9 | 4.6 | 11.1 | 2.2 |
| Barren Land | 10.1 | 0.34 | 54.4 | 1.8 | 6.1 | 10.5 |
| Rangeland | 1961.4 | 65.2 | 1806.5 | 59.0 | 92.6 | 28.3 |
| Classes | XCH4 (ppb) |
|---|---|
| Forestry | 1882 |
| Agricultural Area | 1910 |
| Built Area | 1900 |
| Barren Land | 1901 |
| Rangeland | 1895 |
| Lake Eğirdir | WST | NDCI | FAI |
| Pearson r | 0.57 | 0.49 | 0.58 |
| Statistical significance (p-value) | 0.001357 (p < 0.01) | 0.007 (p < 0.01) | 0.0009 (p < 0.01) |
| Sample size (n) | 29 | ||
| Lake Burdur | WST | NDCI | FAI |
| Pearson r | 0.65 | 0.53 | 0.48 |
| Statistical significance (p-value) | 0.00009 (p < 0.01) | 0.002 (p < 0.01) | 0.006 (p < 0.01) |
| Sample size (n) | 31 | ||
| Year | TCCON Mean (ppb) | TROPOMI Mean (ppb) | Bias (ppb) | Correlation (r) | MAE (ppb) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 1868.57 | 1893.40 | 24.83 | 0.22 | 25.04 |
| 2020 | 1870.32 | 1889.77 | 19.46 | 0.78 | 20.22 |
| 2021 | 1888.68 | 1904.25 | 15.57 | 0.85 | 16.09 |
| 2022 | 1897.13 | 1904.95 | 7.82 | 0.69 | 12.03 |
| 2023 | 1906.72 | 1912.00 | 5.28 | 0.52 | 10.72 |
| 2024 | 1914.18 | 1920.93 | 6.75 | 0.80 | 9.88 |
| Overall | 1891.33 | 1903.89 | 12.56 | 0.79 | 15.13 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Karal Nesil, G.N.; Musaoğlu, N.; Kaçıkoç, M.; Tanık, A.G. Remote Sensing of Atmospheric Methane (XCH4) Concentrations over Lake Ecosystems: Seasonal Dynamics and Environmental Drivers in Eğirdir and Burdur Lakes of Türkiye. Sustainability 2026, 18, 1267. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18031267
Karal Nesil GN, Musaoğlu N, Kaçıkoç M, Tanık AG. Remote Sensing of Atmospheric Methane (XCH4) Concentrations over Lake Ecosystems: Seasonal Dynamics and Environmental Drivers in Eğirdir and Burdur Lakes of Türkiye. Sustainability. 2026; 18(3):1267. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18031267
Chicago/Turabian StyleKaral Nesil, Gül Nur, Nebiye Musaoğlu, Meltem Kaçıkoç, and Ayşe Gül Tanık. 2026. "Remote Sensing of Atmospheric Methane (XCH4) Concentrations over Lake Ecosystems: Seasonal Dynamics and Environmental Drivers in Eğirdir and Burdur Lakes of Türkiye" Sustainability 18, no. 3: 1267. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18031267
APA StyleKaral Nesil, G. N., Musaoğlu, N., Kaçıkoç, M., & Tanık, A. G. (2026). Remote Sensing of Atmospheric Methane (XCH4) Concentrations over Lake Ecosystems: Seasonal Dynamics and Environmental Drivers in Eğirdir and Burdur Lakes of Türkiye. Sustainability, 18(3), 1267. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18031267

