You are currently viewing a new version of our website. To view the old version click .
Sustainability
  • Correction
  • Open Access

26 December 2025

Correction: Yu et al. Sustainable Restoration of Typical Degraded Grasslands: An Evaluation of Ecological Benefits from Bio-Organic Fertilizer Applications. Sustainability 2025, 17, 8716

,
,
,
,
,
and
1
Key Laboratory of Grassland Resources, Ministry of Education, College of Grassland Science, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot 010011, China
2
Values for Development Limited, 107 Green End Road, Cambridge CB4 1RS, UK
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
The authors would like to make the following corrections to the published paper [1]. The changes are as follows:
Subgraphs 1 and 4 are the same, so the author wants to replace subgraph 4 with another one, so we need to replace the original Figure 3:
Figure 3. Changes in vegetation community characteristics under different restoration measures from 2023 to 2024. Note: EN denotes enclosure; EF refers to enclosure with bio-organic fertilizer application; MG represents moderately grazed degraded grassland (serving as control). Blue lines indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) among different treatments in 2023, while red lines represent significant differences (p < 0.05) among different treatments in 2024. Black lines denote significant differences (p < 0.05) for the same treatment across the two years.
With:
Figure 3. Changes in vegetation community characteristics under different restoration measures from 2023 to 2024. Note: EN denotes enclosure; EF refers to enclosure with bio-organic fertilizer application; MG represents moderately grazed degraded grassland (serving as control). Blue lines indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) among different treatments in 2023, while red lines represent significant differences (p < 0.05) among different treatments in 2024. Black lines denote significant differences (p < 0.05) for the same treatment across the two years.
The authors state that the scientific conclusions are unaffected. This correction was approved by the Academic Editor. The original publication has also been updated.

Reference

  1. Yu, Q.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, X.; Li, Y.; Lv, G.; Wilkes, A.; Wang, C. Sustainable Restoration of Typical Degraded Grasslands: An Evaluation of Ecological Benefits from Bio-Organic Fertilizer Applications. Sustainability 2025, 17, 8716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Article Metrics

Citations

Article Access Statistics

Article metric data becomes available approximately 24 hours after publication online.