Next Article in Journal
Green Human Resource Management as a Catalyst for Sustainable Performance: Unveiling the Role of Green Innovations
Previous Article in Journal
Effects of Digital Transformation on Total Factor Productivity of Cultural Enterprises—Empirical Evidence from 251 Listed Cultural Enterprises in China
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effect of Environmental Courts on Pollution Abatement: A Spatial Difference-in-Differences Analysis

1
School of Economics, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha 410128, China
2
College of Tourism, Hunan Normal University, Changsha 410081, China
3
School of Geography, South China Normal University, Guangzhou 510631, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2024, 16(4), 1452; https://doi.org/10.3390/su16041452
Submission received: 19 December 2023 / Revised: 6 February 2024 / Accepted: 7 February 2024 / Published: 8 February 2024

Abstract

This paper investigates the impact of environmental courts on pollution abatement at the city level, utilizing the establishment of environmental courts in China as a quasi-experiment. A spatial difference-in-differences model is employed to control for the influence of environmental courts on neighbouring non-pilot cities. The results underscore the effectiveness of environmental courts in reducing industrial pollutant emissions, evident in both the pilot areas and adjacent non-pilot areas. The influence of environmental courts on pollution abatement is more pronounced in cities characterized by stronger environmental regulations, higher level of economic agglomeration, and higher level of openness. Mechanism analysis shows that environmental courts promote environmental supervision by governments, public participation in environmental protection, and expenditure on environmental governance by firms. In summary, this paper unveils the tangible effects of environmental courts on pollution abatement and elucidates the mechanisms underpinning this relationship. These findings provide timely implications for regulators concerned with environmental protection.
Keywords: environment courts; pollution abatement; adjacency effect; spatial difference-in-differences environment courts; pollution abatement; adjacency effect; spatial difference-in-differences

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Deng, J.; Li, M.; Li, Y.; Lu, J. Effect of Environmental Courts on Pollution Abatement: A Spatial Difference-in-Differences Analysis. Sustainability 2024, 16, 1452. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16041452

AMA Style

Deng J, Li M, Li Y, Lu J. Effect of Environmental Courts on Pollution Abatement: A Spatial Difference-in-Differences Analysis. Sustainability. 2024; 16(4):1452. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16041452

Chicago/Turabian Style

Deng, Jingjing, Mingxian Li, Yi Li, and Jun Lu. 2024. "Effect of Environmental Courts on Pollution Abatement: A Spatial Difference-in-Differences Analysis" Sustainability 16, no. 4: 1452. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16041452

APA Style

Deng, J., Li, M., Li, Y., & Lu, J. (2024). Effect of Environmental Courts on Pollution Abatement: A Spatial Difference-in-Differences Analysis. Sustainability, 16(4), 1452. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16041452

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop