Next Article in Journal
Green Environmental Management System to Support Environmental Performance: What Factors Influence SMEs to Adopt Green Innovations?
Next Article in Special Issue
Valorization of Fruit Co-Product Flours for Human Nutrition: Challenges, Applications, and Perspectives
Previous Article in Journal
Does the Construction of High-Speed Rail Change the Development of Regional Finance?
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Impacts of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Agri-Food Systems in West Africa

by
Hamid El Bilali
1,*,
Lawali Dambo
2,
Jacques Nanema
3,
Sheirita Reine Fanta Tietiambou
4,
Iro Dan Guimbo
5 and
Romaric Kiswendsida Nanema
6
1
International Centre for Advanced Mediterranean Agronomic Studies (CIHEAM-Bari), Via Ceglie 9, Valenzano, 70010 Bari, Italy
2
Department of Geography, Faculty of Letters and Human Sciences, Abdou Moumouni University, Niamey P.O. Box 237, Niger
3
Programme Agrinovia, Joseph Ki-Zerbo University, 03 BP, Ouagadougou 7021, Burkina Faso
4
University Centre of Gaoua, Nazi BONI University, 01 BP, Bobo-Dioulasso 1091, Burkina Faso
5
Department of Rural Engineering, Water and Forests, Faculty of Agronomy, Abdou Moumouni University, Niamey P.O. Box 237, Niger
6
Biosciences Laboratory, Joseph Ki-Zerbo University, 03 BP, Ouagadougou 7021, Burkina Faso
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2023, 15(13), 10643; https://doi.org/10.3390/su151310643
Submission received: 15 April 2023 / Revised: 1 July 2023 / Accepted: 4 July 2023 / Published: 6 July 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainable Agriculture and Agri-Food)

Abstract

:
A growing body of evidence suggests that the COVID-19 pandemic affected not only the functioning of food supply chains but also the performance and outcomes of agri-food systems. In this context, this paper analyses the scholarly literature dealing with the impacts of the pandemic on West African agriculture and food systems. A search carried out on the Web of Science in March 2023 returned 176 records and 87 eligible documents were included in the systematic review. The bibliometric analysis suggests a decreasing interest in the research field. Moreover, a large share of the eligible articles are authored by researchers based outside West Africa. There is a research gap, especially in Cabo Verde, Ivory Coast, Gambia, Guinea, Guinea-Bissau, Mauritania, Niger and Togo. Studies focus on the crop production subsector and consumption stage. The pandemic affected all four dimensions/pillars of food security (viz. availability, access, utilisation/use, and stability). However, most of the analysed documents focus on food access (economic accessibility and physical accessibility). Moreover, COVID-19 affected all the dimensions of agri-food systems (viz. environmental, economic, social, and political) but the analysed articles focus on the pandemic’s socio-economic impacts, especially those relating to food security and health. The promotion of research on the impacts of the pandemic on agri-food systems in West Africa is paramount to designing the evidence-based policies needed to improve the preparedness of the region for current and future crises and shocks.

1. Introduction

In March 2020, the World Health Organization (WHO) declared the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) a pandemic [1]. As of March 2023, COVID-19 affected all countries, with more than 759 million confirmed cases and causing more than 6 million deaths [2]. Beyond its health impacts, COVID-19 triggered an unparalleled global crisis with multidimensional impacts [3,4,5]. Indeed, the pandemic triggered a global economic and financial crisis, with increasing rates of unemployment and poverty [6]. Therefore, the pandemic is likely to jeopardise the implementation of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development and the achievement of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) [7]. Furthermore, the pandemic triggered disruptive impacts on the global agri-food system [5,8,9,10,11,12,13,14]. The COVID-19 pandemic affected different components and elements of the agri-food system such as agricultural production and food supply, food distribution and food environments, food-related consumer behaviour, food consumption patterns and diets [15,16,17,18,19,20,21], with implications in terms of food and nutrition security [15,19]. Indeed, the strong virus containment measures (e.g., lockdowns, home confinements, and social distancing), enforced by governments and authorities across the globe, resulted in a food emergency [12,22]. The impacts were recorded not only in developing countries but also in developed ones. For instance, referring to the context of the United States, Fleischhacker et al. [19] posit that “The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak has further laid bare these strains, including food insecurity, major diet-related comorbidities for poor outcomes from COVID-19 such as diabetes, hypertension, and obesity, and insufficient surveillance on and coordination of our food system” (p. 721). Impacts regard all the dimensions/pillars of food security (viz. availability, access, utilisation/use, and stability) and have been particularly severe in low- and middle-income countries [23].
Indeed, growing evidence shows that not only the propagation of the virus and the deaths it caused but also its impacts varied from one country to another [24,25,26,27,28,29]. In this respect, West Africa, which is one of the poorest regions in the world that is still highly reliant on agriculture and where food insecurity was a challenge even before the pandemic, is a particularly interesting case study. The confirmed cases of COVID-19, as well as the deaths, have been rather low in West Africa (Table 1). This low rate of infection in West Africa, in particular, and sub-Saharan Africa, in general, was attributed, among others, to the young age of the population and plant-based diets [30], which boost the immune system. However, also the number of doses administered and vaccinated people have been low across the region.
The pandemic had far-reaching impacts on the economies and livelihoods in developing countries of Western Africa, e.g., Nigeria [32], Ghana [33], and Burkina Faso [34]. The pandemic also disrupted trade with Africa [35], with implications in terms of food security. Indeed, Vasseur et al. [36] suggest that restrictive measures in the West African countries affected all four pillars/dimensions of food security (viz. availability, access, utilisation/use, and stability) and point out that the “region is highly vulnerable to such crises, which can combine their effects with those of other events such as climate change and civil unrest”.
Data referring to the pre-COVID-19 period (Table 2) show that agriculture had a high contribution to the gross domestic product (GDP) and employment in West African countries; the share of agriculture in GDP ranges from 4.6% in Cabo Verde to 58.2% in Sierra Leone versus 4.0% worldwide, whereas employment in agriculture ranges from 11% in Cabo Verde to 73% in Niger vs. 27% globally. Meanwhile, food insecurity and malnutrition were big challenges in the region even before the pandemic. Indeed, the prevalence of undernourishment was high in the Western Africa region; it ranged from 5.1% in Mali to 37.5% in Liberia over the period 2017–2019. The situation was even more alarming when it came to the prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity, which ranged from 37.7% in Côte d’Ivoire to 88.5% in Liberia over the same period. Regionwide, the prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity increased from 50.8% in 2017–2019 to 57.0% in 2019–2021, which might have been due, among others, to the effects of the pandemic.
Some previous reviews dealt with the COVID-19 pandemic in West Africa. However, most of them regarded only the efficacy of medicinal plants against the virus [37,38,39]. Other reviews touched upon food insecurity and malnutrition, but they did not cover the whole region and are not recent, e.g., VanVolkenburg et al. [40] published in February 2022, and Vasseur et al. [36] published in November 2021. Others do not have a specific focus on the COVID-19 pandemic, e.g., Adeyeye et al. [41], who published in July 2021, or do not focus on the food-related impacts of the pandemic, e.g., Losso et al. [30], who published in September 2021, and Chackalackal et al. [42], who published in October 2021. Therefore, there is so far no recent review that sheds in a comprehensive way light on the research relating the pandemic to food and agriculture in the whole of West Africa. To bridge this gap, this systematic review analyses the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on agriculture and food systems in West African countries. In particular, it investigates the bibliometrics and geography of the research field and explores how it addresses key topics such as food security pillars and sustainability dimensions.

2. Methods

The present article draws upon a systematic review that follows the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines [43,44]. A search was performed on 2 March 2023, considering all the databases of the Web of Science (WoS), viz. Web of Science Core Collection, Current Contents Connect, SCiELO Citation Index and MEDLINE. The search was carried out using the following string: (“COVID-19” OR COVID19 OR Coronavirus OR “SARS-CoV-2”) AND (“agricultur*” OR agro OR food) AND (“West* Africa” OR Sahel OR Benin OR Burkina OR “Cape Verde” OR “Cabo Verde” OR Gambia OR Ghana OR Guinea OR “Guinea-Bissau” OR “Ivory Coast” OR “Côte d’Ivoire” OR Liberia OR Mali OR Mauritania OR Niger OR Nigeria OR Senegal OR “Sierra Leone” OR Togo). It returned 176 potentially eligible documents. The selection of eligible documents was informed by the methodology adopted by El Bilali [45] and El Bilali et al. [46]. The selection steps and process are described in Table 3. In particular, three eligibility criteria were considered: geographical coverage (viz., the document addresses at least one West African country); thematic focus (viz., the document addresses both COVID-19 and agriculture/food); and document type (viz., only research articles/papers, book chapters or conference papers were included; editorials, letters to editors, commentaries and/or notes, as well as reviews, were discarded). Only documents meeting all three criteria were assessed as eligible and included in the systematic review.
Following the screening of the document titles, seven documents were considered ineligible as they do not refer to West Africa; documents covering larger geographical areas (e.g., Sahel, and Sub-Saharan Africa), as well as those where the geographical focus was not indicated in the title, were kept for further analysis in the following steps. Further, 74 documents were excluded following the analysis of abstracts as they do not meet at least one of the inclusion criteria. For instance, some documents refer to Aspergillus niger, a fungus, or Hyoscyamus niger L., a plant, which have nothing to do with ‘Niger’ the country. Furthermore, ‘Guinea’ refers sometimes to Guinea pigs, used in vaccine tests, Equatorial Guinea or Papua New Guinea rather than the two Western African countries (viz., Guinea and Guinea-Bissau). Similarly, Senegal refers sometimes to plants such as Acacia senegal. Other documents deal with the Ebola virus and provide only in the end some general recommendations regarding COVID-19. Documents that analyse the health effects of COVID-19 without any reference to food were excluded as well. Likewise, studies describing in vitro tests of the efficacy of some plant-based treatments on the virus were discarded, while those describing the relationships between food intake and the immune system were included. Moreover, eight ineligible documents were discarded following the scrutiny of the full texts, and these included seven reviews [30,36,37,39,40,41,42].
Accordingly, 87 documents that resulted were eligible and were included in the systematic review (Table 4), consisting of only articles, without book chapters or proceeding papers.
The analysis of the selected documents was related to both the bibliometrics and topics addressed. Actually, the analysis focused on bibliographical metrics, research geography, agriculture subsectors, food chain stages, food security pillars, and sustainability dimensions (Table 5).
The limitations of this systematic review are similar to those pointed out by the authors whose methods were applied, viz. El Bilali [45], El Bilali et al. [46], El Bilali [133] and El Bilali et al. [13]. They relate to the choice of the search terms/keywords as well as the use of the Web of Science database for the search, which implies that the article includes only publications indexed in WoS. This, in turn, means that the paper includes neither articles published in journals that are not indexed in WoS nor the so-called grey literature (e.g., reports).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Bibliometrics and Research Geography

The analysis of the selected documents suggests that there was a time lag between the outbreak of the disease and the publication of the results of the first studies on the impacts of the pandemic on agri-food systems in West Africa; the first article indexed in WoS [34] dates back to August 2020. The annual output of articles is quite high but the peak of the number of publications in 2021 (48 articles) might suggest that interest in the research field is decreasing across the region.
Regarding the sources (Table 6), the analysis shows that the maximum number of articles was published in PLoS ONE (5 articles), Agricultural Systems (4 articles), American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, Food Policy, Global Food Security: Agriculture Policy, Economics and Environment, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, and Sustainability (3 articles each). Nevertheless, the findings of the research on the impacts of the pandemic on agri-food systems in West Africa were published in 63 further sources and journals, which shows that there is no prominent publication outlet. The majority of the selected articles fall under the research areas of agriculture (21 articles, 24.1%), science technology (15 articles, 17.2%), occupational health (13 articles, 14.9%), business economics and food science technology (10 articles, 11.5%, each), and environmental sciences—ecology (9 articles, 10.3%). However, the selected 87 articles can be categorised under 34 research areas (e.g., development studies, infectious diseases, nutrition dietetics, sociology, tropical medicine, geography, plant sciences, psychology, anthropology, and behavioural sciences), which implies that the research field is multidisciplinary.
The bibliometric analysis indicates that the most prominent, productive authors in the research field are Prakash Kumar Jha, Jan B. Middendorf and Vara P. V. Prasad (four articles each). However, the fact that the 87 eligible articles were authored by 482 scholars, which implies that the majority of the concerned scholars authored only one paper, shows, on the one side, that there is an extended collaboration in the research field and, on the other side, that this is rather expected given that the research strand is rather young.
The analysis of countries and affiliations shows that the list of the most active countries is dominated by Nigeria (30 articles, 34.5%) and the USA (28 articles, 32.2%) followed by Ghana (16 articles, 18.4%) and Burkina Faso (11 articles, 12.6%). The list of the top ten affiliation countries includes only four West African countries (viz., Nigeria, Ghana, Burkina Faso, Senegal), while the remaining countries are from outside the region (viz., USA, England, South Africa, Kenya, Canada, Netherlands, Ethiopia, and France). The 87 eligible articles were authored by scholars and researchers from 51 countries. Apart from Nigeria, Ghana, and Burkina Faso, affiliation countries from West Africa also included Senegal (four articles), and Benin and Cote d’Ivoire (two articles each).
Nevertheless, a large share of the eligible articles is authored by researchers based outside West Africa, either in Africa (e.g., Cameroon, Egypt, Ethiopia, Kenya, South Africa, and Tanzania), Asia (e.g., China), Europe (e.g., Belgium, England, France, Germany, Hungary, Italy, Netherlands, Sweden, and Switzerland), North America (e.g., Canada and the USA), or Oceania (e.g., Australia). In fact, it comes as no surprise that the most important funding agencies are based outside West Africa, especially in the USA (e.g., United States Agency for International Development—USAID, United States Department of Health, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, and National Institutes of Health—NIH) or international foundations (e.g., Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation) and organisations (Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research—CGIAR).
Concerning affiliation institutions, the 87 selected articles were authored by researchers from 266 universities and research centres, which suggests a strong collaboration. The most prominent institutions in the research field are CGIAR (10 articles, 11.5%), the University of Ibadan and the University of Nigeria (7 articles, 8.0%, each), and the University of Cape Coast (Ghana), the University of Ghana and the University of London (5 articles, 5.7%, each). Apart from the above-cited ones, prominent West African institutions are located in Nigeria (e.g., Obafemi Awolowo University, Alex Ekwueme Federal University, Ebonyi State University, Federal University of Technology Owerri, Nigerian Institute of Medical Research, and Nnamdi Azikiwe University), Ghana (e.g., Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology), Burkina Faso (e.g., University of Ouagadougou, Nouna Health Research Centre) and Senegal (e.g., Senegalese Agricultural Research Institute—ISRA).
The analysis of the geography of the research field shows that there are considerable differences among West African countries (Table 7). In fact, the lion’s share of studies on the impacts of the pandemic on agri-food systems were carried out in Nigeria; 50 articles (so 57.5% of the selected documents) deal with Nigeria either alone (31 articles) or with other countries (19 articles). This result is somehow expected since Nigeria is the largest and most populous country in the region. Research in this field was also performed in Ghana (15 articles), Burkina Faso (6 articles), Senegal (3 articles), and Benin, Liberia, Mali, and Sierra Leone (1 article each). Meanwhile, no article deals specifically with the impacts of the pandemic in many West African countries, viz. Cape Verde, Ivory Coast, Gambia, Guinea, Guinea-Bissau, Mauritania, Niger, and Togo. This suggests a huge gap in this research field in the concerned countries. However, some of these West African countries are mentioned in studies dealing with the impacts of the COVID-19 on prices of sorghum, maize and rice in Africa, viz. Benin, Burkina Faso, Cabo Verde, Ghana, Guinea, Ivory Coast, Liberia, Mauritania, Mali, Nigeria, Niger, Senegal, Sierra Leone, and Togo [85], the living standards during the pandemic, viz. Burkina Faso, Ghana, and Sierra Leone [100], the burden of malnutrition during the pandemic viz. Burkina Faso, Liberia, Mali, and Niger [113], or policy options to mitigate the pandemic’s impacts on rice value chains, viz. Benin, Burkina Faso, Ivory Coast, Ghana, Guinea-Bissau, Guinea, Liberia, Mali, Mauritania, Nigeria, Niger, Sierra Leone, Senegal, Gambia, and Togo [128].
Moreover, there is no single study that analyses the impacts of the pandemic on agri-food systems in the whole West Africa region but there are some multi-country studies. For instance, Coulibaly [93] assesses the impacts of government policy responses to the COVID-19 pandemic in the West African Economic and Monetary Union (viz. Benin, Burkina Faso, Guinea-Bissau, Ivory Coast, Mali, Niger, Senegal, and Togo) and their spillover effects on the consumer price index. Jha et al. [108] evaluate the impact of the pandemic on the sown area and yields of the major cereals (viz. rice, sorghum maize, and millet) in Burkina Faso and Senegal.
Some studies focus on sub-Saharan Africa, including countries from West Africa. For instance, Onyenweaku et al. [72] analyse the special foods and drinks that were consumed to boost the immune system and prevent COVID-19 during the lockdown in numerous countries in sub-Saharan Africa (viz. Cameroon, Nigeria, Ghana, Ethiopia, Kenya, and South Africa). Rudin-Rush et al. [75] document trends in food insecurity during 2020, the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic, in four sub-Saharan African countries, namely Burkina Faso, Ethiopia, Malawi, and Nigeria.
Other studies are rather global, dealing with countries from different continents; for instance, Wrabel et al. [78] document the operational experiences and lessons learned by nutrition practitioners dealing with the screening of acute malnutrition and its treatment during the COVID-19 pandemic in 17 developing countries from Africa (viz., Democratic Republic of Congo, Ethiopia, Nigeria, Kenya, Malawi, Somalia, South Sudan, Tanzania, and Uganda) and Asia (viz. Bangladesh, India, Jordan, Myanmar, Nepal, Pakistan, Philippines, and Yemen). Meanwhile, Gligorić et al. [60] analyse population-wide shifts in dietary interests in 18 developed and developing countries from Africa (viz., Egypt, Kenya, and Nigeria), Americas (viz., Brazil, Canada, Mexico, and the United States), Asia (viz., India, Indonesia, and Japan), Europe (viz., Denmark, France, Germany, Italy, Spain, Sweden, and the United Kingdom), and Oceania (viz., Australia).

3.2. Agriculture Subsectors and Food Chain Stages

As for the agriculture subsectors, most of the selected articles do not refer to any specific subsector. This is particularly the case of studies that deal with trends in consumption as well as changes in food consumption patterns and diets during the pandemic. Articles dealing with a specific subsector generally address crop production whereas animal production/livestock and fisheries/aquaculture are generally overlooked (Table 8). As for crop production, the crops analysed include rice [68,128], vegetables [65,123,126], cereals [85,108], beans/pulses [115], and aromatic and medicinal plants [67]. For instance, Martey et al. [64] analyse how the perceptions of the shocks related to the COVID-19 pandemic affected the acceptance and adoption of sustainable agricultural practices (e.g., zero tillage, mixed cropping, and mulching) among Ghanaian farmers. In the case of animal production, studies regard poultry [49,91] and dairy cattle [122]. For instance, Vall et al. [122] analyse the immediate effects of COVID-19 on the dairy sector in Burkina Faso, Kenya, Madagascar, and Senegal. Only a few articles deal with fisheries and aquaculture [74,131]. For instance, Ragasa et al. [74] shed light on the development and resilience of pond aquaculture in Ghana during the pandemic.
Concerning the food chain stages, the analysis suggests that the pandemic affected the whole food chain from input procurement to food waste management through production, processing, transport and distribution, and consumption. Nevertheless, most of the selected documents deal with the downstream stages of the food chain (e.g., consumption), while the upstream stages (e.g., production) and, especially, intermediate stages (e.g., processing and packing) are often overlooked (Table 9). Indeed, most of the scientific literature addresses the impacts of the pandemic on food consumption patterns, diets and food security (especially access to food) in West Africa.
The pandemic made more difficult access to inputs, which affected negatively yield and production. Referring to smallholder farmers in Senegal, Jha et al. [50] stated that “77.7% of respondents experienced a reduction in access to inputs, 70.3% experienced a reduction in ability to plant crops during the planting season, 57.1% experienced a reduction in ability to rent farm machinery, and 69.2% reported a reduction in yields”.
Only a few papers deal with processing and often in a marginal way. Vall et al. [122] suggest that milk processing costs increased during the pandemic in Burkina Faso, Kenya, Madagascar, and Senegal. Yegbemey et al. [126] report that vegetable farmers in North-Western Nigeria increased their own home processing during the pandemic, to cope with marketing difficulties.
The pandemic also affected access to markets and distribution of agri-food products. Referring to vegetable producers in Burkina Faso, Middendorf et al. [65] conclude that “The survey results clearly show impacts of COVID-19 on vegetable systems, including a reduction in access to inputs, a reduction in yields, a loss of income, reduced access to local and urban markets, reduced access to transportation, and an increase in post-harvest loss”.
Many studies suggest that the pandemic affected negatively food consumption patterns and diets, especially during the period of lockdown [48,53]. However, other studies posit that attention to health and healthy diets, especially those presumed to boost the immune system, increased during the pandemic [59,60,67,72]. Further studies deal with food (in)security during the pandemic [66,94,112]. Others address the effects of the pandemic on waste; Kasim et al. [110] show that the generation of waste increased and its composition changed in Guyana and Nigeria.
Some articles take a more holistic, systemic approach, thus addressing different stages of the food chain. For instance, Vall et al. [122] assess the impacts of the COVID-19 outbreak as well as the containment measures on the production, collection, processing, marketing, and consumption of milk in four African countries (viz., Burkina Faso, Kenya, Madagascar, and Senegal).

3.3. Impacts on Food Security and Nutrition

The analysis of the scholarly literature suggests that the pandemic impacted all four dimensions/pillars of food security (viz., availability, access, utilisation/use and stability). However, the magnitude of the impacts changed from one dimension to another (Table 10). Indeed, most of the analysed documents focus on food access. Moreover, the results are in line with the review by Van Volkenburg et al. [40] who point out that “Documents reporting on food security seldom included all four pillars (i.e., availability, access, utility, stability) in their analysis despite the reciprocal connection between them all”. The only exception is Obayelu et al. [117], who analyse the immediate and potential long-term effects of COVID-19 on agriculture production (cf., food availability), food access and dietary intake (cf., food utilisation) in Nigeria. The impacts of the pandemic on food security dimensions involve different channels and pathways.
As for food availability, the pandemic affected both domestic food production and global food chains. The pandemic caused a decrease in domestic food production due, among other reasons, to a decrease in yield and productivity, with a consequent decrease in food supply and availability. This decrease is due to the difficult access to inputs [50,64,65,92,98,115], such as fertilisers, pesticides, and, even, seeds. Furthermore, the disruption of global food supply chains caused an increase in the prices of inputs [64,96]. Such a disruption also affected the trade and import of some products and their availability on the domestic market [57,82,88,111,123]. The decrease in the domestic food supply is also caused by losses of agri-food products [65,106] that are, inter alia, caused by labour shortages [50,65,106] and, therefore, missed harvests.
As for food access, the analysis suggests that the pandemic affected both economic accessibility and affordability, and physical accessibility. Physical access to food was affected by the containment measures that were introduced in West African countries. However, the impacts varied not only among countries, depending on the severity and stringency of the containment measures, but also from one socio-economic group to another. In particular, the poor [77,94] and women [63,77,94] seem to be more affected. Referring to the context of Burkina Faso, Traoré et al. [77] found that “during COVID-19, female-headed households, poor households and farm households remain the most vulnerable in terms of access to basic foods, health services and food insecurity”. Likewise, focusing on nine sub-Saharan African countries (viz., Chad, Djibouti, Ethiopia, Kenya, Mali, Malawi, Nigeria, South Africa, and Uganda), Dasgupta and Robinson [94] point out that “Econometric analysis reveals that female-headed households, the poor, and the less-formally educated, appear to suffer more in terms of food insecurity during this global pandemic”. Economic access was negatively affected by the pandemic due to the increase in food prices [61,82,85]. Agyei et al. [85] found that the outbreak of COVID-19 caused an increase in the prices of cereals (e.g., maize, sorghum, and rice) in sub-Saharan Africa. Furthermore, the purchasing power of many households decreased during the pandemic due to job losses [54] as well as negative impacts on livelihoods [80,114].
Concerning food utilisation, the focus of the studies is mainly on diet quality and dietary diversity, and food safety. The pandemic affected diet quality with a reduction in the consumption of many health-enhancing products [60,112] as well as an increase in the use of unhealthy foods [60] and alcohol [53]. This, as well as the reduction in physical activity/exercise especially during the lockdown [53], caused an increase in the prevalence of non-communicable diseases. However, there was, at the same time, an increase in attention to and interest in health [59,60,72]. For that, some scholars suggest that the pandemic improved nutritional knowledge [59,120]. Saah et al. [120] found that “Health knowledge has improved due to COVID-19 in terms of access to health information and increased understanding of health issues. There were reductions in risky health-related lifestyles (alcohol intake, sharing of personal items, and consumption of junk foods) while improvements were observed in healthy lifestyles such as regular physical exercise and increased consumption of fruits and vegetables”. Meanwhile, the population started to pay more attention to the safety of agri-food products [76,125]. Tchuenchieu Kamgain et al. [76] stated that “The awareness of the pandemic led to a reduction in street foods consumption, a rise in the preference for cooked foods, and a greater awareness of hygiene during food preparation and washing of fruits and vegetables before eating” in Cameroon, Ethiopia, Ghana, Kenya, Nigeria, and South Africa.
As for the stability dimension, some studies provide scenarios and projections regarding the evolution of food production and access over time. For instance, Jha et al. [108] use a calibrated model for crop simulation to estimate the potential impacts of COVID-19 on major cereal crops (viz., rice, maize, millet and sorghum) in Senegal and Burkina Faso. Zidouemba et al. [132] use alternative scenarios (optimistic and pessimistic) in a computable general equilibrium model to analyse the impacts of COVID-19 on the food security status of households in Burkina Faso.

3.4. Impacts on Food System Sustainability

The evidence collected from the analysed papers suggests that COVID-19 affected all the dimensions of agri-food systems (Table 11). Referring to the Senegalese context, Middendorf et al. [114] posit that “Anticipated impacts of COVID-19 on agriculture will be felt on both the biophysical aspects such as production and access to inputs and socioeconomic aspects such as access to labor, markets, or rapid shifts in demand”. However, it comes as no surprise that most of the documents that were found to be eligible and were analysed focus on the socio-economic impacts of the pandemic, especially those relating to food security and health.
The analysis shows that the environmental dimension is often overlooked. For instance, no studies connect the pandemic directly to biodiversity and natural resource management. However, there are a few exceptions. For instance, Andrieu et al. [87] assess the possible effects of the responses of both farmers and policymakers of mitigating and alleviating the adverse effects of the pandemic on the agricultural sector in Burkina Faso, Colombia, and France on the emissions of greenhouse gases (GHG). Kasim et al. [110] investigate how the pandemic affected household waste generation and waste composition in Guyana and Nigeria. Martey et al. [64] analyse the effects of COVID-19 shocks on the adoption of sustainable agricultural practices (e.g., zero tillage, mixed cropping, and mulching) in Ghana.
Regarding the economic dimension, the pandemic affected socio-economic activities, including the primary sector, which determined the loss of jobs. Moreover, it affected the marketing of agri-food products and caused in many countries of West Africa an increase in food prices. Agyei et al. [85] found that restrictions on movements and lockdowns in the wake of COVID-19 increased food prices in sub-Saharan Africa and argue that “exchange rate, inflation and crude oil prices exerted a detrimental effect on food prices”. Likewise, referring to Enugu State (Nigeria), Chiemela et al. [92] found that “COVID-19 has led to disruptions in rural agribusiness in Enugu state, Nigeria, by reducing the profitability of agribusinesses through channels such as high cost of seeds, credit sales, produce not harvested due to the pandemic, and unavailability of seeds”.
As for the social dimension, studies focus on the effects of the pandemic on health and food (in)security. As shown in the previous section, the pandemic affected all the dimensions of food security in West Africa. Moreover, the analysis shows that the pandemic increased vulnerability and poverty. The impacts are often differentiated not only between urban and rural areas but also by socio-economic groups and genders. The pandemic also had some cascading effects; for example, its effects on food security catalysed conflicts among rural households, especially poor ones. This was the case in Nigeria where Adebayo and Oluwamayowa [80] suggest that “Extreme volatility in their inability to access food as a result of food shortages and the inability to benefit from government palliatives has been found to trigger incidents of conflict and malnutrition on households”.
While many articles end up with some policy recommendations, there are only a few articles dealing with policy and governance. Studies dealing with the policy dimension focus on the effects of the virus containment measures introduced by governments and/or measures taken to mitigate the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on the economy and population’s livelihoods, with a particular emphasis on food (in)security. For instance, Coulibaly [93] analyses the impacts of the policy responses to COVID-19 in the West African Economic and Monetary Union and underlines “the importance of regional cooperation and coordination for fighting the adverse socioeconomic impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic”. Meanwhile, referring to safety nets and coping strategies in nine sub-Saharan African countries (viz., Chad, Djibouti, Ethiopia, Kenya, Mali, Malawi, Nigeria, South Africa, and Uganda), Dasgupta and Robinson [94] point out that “These nine countries employ both food and cash safety nets, with the evidence suggesting that, at least when these data were collected, cash safety nets have been slightly more effective at reducing food insecurity”.
Some studies address at the same time different dimensions of sustainability. For instance, Aberese-Ako et al. [51] analyse the socio-economic and health impacts of the pandemic on rural and urban slum dwellers in Ghana. Meanwhile, Baada et al. [90], referring to the Upper West Region in Ghana, highlight “how interlocking vulnerabilities regarding historical, environmental, geopolitical, socio-economic, health, and gendered inequalities affect the disposition of agrarian communities to cope with and recover from the COVID-19 pandemic”.
Scholars made several recommendations to make the agri-food systems in West Africa more sustainable and resilient to the COVID-19 pandemic and, eventually, to future crises, pandemics, and shocks. These fall within the domains of practice, policy and research (Table 12). Different scholars also stress that lessons learned and conclusions drawn from the COVID-19 pandemic should be used to improve preparedness for future crises and shocks [86,118]. In particular, some scholars call for strengthening social protection policies [86]. They also call for paying more attention to food security issues in continency plans and strategies. Vasseur et al. [36] argue that “Food security must be seriously considered by governments when implementing restrictive measures during a pandemic. Consideration of health factors alone at the expense of food security can greatly exacerbate health problems and even increase cases of disease”. Similarly, Mertens and Peñalvo [113] suggest that “COVID-19 response plans in malnourished countries, vulnerable to fatal COVID-19, should incorporate food security, nutrition, and social protection as a priority component in order to reduce COVID-19 fatality”. Moreover, future policies should be evidence-based to be effective and for that research is paramount. For instance, Dasgupta and Robinson [57] highlight the “importance of improving household resilience to future systemic crises, and using evidence-based best practice in the design of relevant policy instruments”. Some scholars consider the COVID-19 pandemic as an opportunity to bring about the transition towards more sustainable and resilient agri-food systems. For instance, Dugué et al. [98] argue that “This crisis is an opportunity to consider areas for intervention to make Burkina Faso’s agriculture less dependent on external markets and imported factors of production. This implies the substitution of imported food products by local products and an agro-ecological transition to reduce the importation of synthetic inputs”. Proposals in that direction also include the promotion of short food supply chains [115].

4. Conclusions

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first review that analyses systematically and comprehensively the scholarly literature dealing with the multifaceted impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on agri-food systems in the whole of West Africa.
The bibliometric analysis shows that the annual output of articles is quite high but the peak of publications number in 2021 might suggest that interest in the research field is decreasing. The selected articles relate to more than thirty research areas, which suggests that the research field is multidisciplinary. The analysis of the countries of authors’ affiliations shows that the most active countries are Nigeria and USA followed by Ghana and Burkina Faso. However, a large share of the eligible articles is authored by researchers and scholars based outside West Africa. Likewise, the most important funding agencies are based outside the region, especially in the USA. Meanwhile, the lion’s share of studies were carried out in Nigeria whereas no article deals with any West African countries, viz. Cape Verde, Ivory Coast, Gambia, Guinea-Bissau, Guinea, Mauritania, Niger, and Togo. This suggests a huge gap in the concerned countries.
Most of the selected articles do not refer to any specific agriculture subsector. This is particularly the case with studies that deal with changes in food consumption patterns and diets. Articles dealing with a specific subsector generally address crop production whereas animal production and fisheries are generally overlooked. The pandemic affected the whole food chain from input procurement to food waste management through production, processing, transport and distribution, and consumption. Nevertheless, most of the analysed documents deal with the downstream stages of the food chain (e.g., consumption), while the upstream stages (e.g., production) and, especially, intermediate stages (e.g., processing and packing) are often overlooked.
The pandemic impacted all four dimensions/pillars of food security (viz., availability, access, utilisation and stability). However, the magnitude of the impacts changed from one dimension to another. Indeed, most of the analysed documents focus on food access. The impacts of the pandemic on food security dimensions involve different channels and pathways. As for food access, the analysis suggests that the pandemic affected both economic accessibility and affordability, and physical accessibility. Physical access to food was affected by the containment measures that were introduced in West African countries. However, the impacts varied not only among countries, depending on the stringency of the containment measures, but also from one socio-economic group to another. Economic access was negatively affected by the pandemic due to the increase in food prices. Furthermore, the purchasing power of many households decreased during the pandemic due to job losses as well as negative impacts on livelihoods.
The evidence collected from the analysed papers suggests that COVID-19 affected all the dimensions of agri-food systems. However, it comes as no surprise that most of the selected documents focus on the socio-economic impacts of the pandemic, especially those relating to food security and health. Regarding the economic dimension, the pandemic affected socio-economic activities, including the primary sector, which saw a loss of jobs. Moreover, it affected the marketing of agri-food products and caused in many countries of West Africa an increase in food prices. As for the social dimension, studies focus on the pandemic impacts on health and food (in)security. Moreover, the analysis shows that the pandemic increased vulnerability and poverty. The impacts are often differentiated not only between urban and rural areas but also by socio-economic groups and genders. Only a few articles deal with policy, especially the effects of the virus containment measures and/or the measures taken to mitigate and alleviate the impacts of the pandemic on the economy and population’s livelihoods, with a particular emphasis on food (in)security.
The COVID-19 pandemic has shown the multiple vulnerabilities and dysfunctions of the agri-food system in West Africa. For that, urgent actions—in practice, policy, and research—are needed to make the regional agri-food system more sustainable and resilient. In this respect, the lessons learned and conclusions drawn from the COVID-19 pandemic should be used to improve the preparedness for future crises, pandemics and shocks, with particular attention to safety nets and protection systems. Indeed, the pandemic can be seized as an opportunity to pinpoint areas of intervention and leverage points to improve food sovereignty and self-sufficiency while reducing dependence on imports and vulnerability to disruptions in global food supply chains. Moreover, it is necessary to pay more attention to the issue of food and nutrition security, especially for the poor and vulnerable groups of the population, in future contingency plans and strategies. It is also necessary to boost short food supply chains and agroecological production models in all agriculture subsectors (viz., crop production, animal production, and pastoralism, and fisheries and aquaculture). Moreover, future policies should be evidence-based to be effective and for that research is paramount to ensure the effectiveness, efficiency, and sustainability of policies.

Author Contributions

Conceptualisation, H.E.B.; methodology, H.E.B.; software, H.E.B.; validation, H.E.B.; formal analysis, H.E.B.; investigation, H.E.B.; resources, H.E.B.; data curation, H.E.B.; writing—original draft preparation, H.E.B., L.D., J.N., S.R.F.T., I.D.G. and R.K.N.; writing—review and editing, H.E.B., L.D., J.N., S.R.F.T., I.D.G. and R.K.N.; visualisation, H.E.B.; project administration, H.E.B.; funding acquisition, H.E.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the DeSIRA initiative (Development Smart Innovation through Research in Agriculture) of the European Union (contribution agreement FOOD/2021/422-681).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

This work was carried out within the project SUSTLIVES (SUSTaining and improving local crop patrimony in Burkina Faso and Niger for better LIVes and EcoSystems—https://www.sustlives.eu).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. WHO. Naming the Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) and the Virus That Causes It. Available online: https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019/technical-guidance/naming-the-coronavirus-disease-(covid-2019)-and-the-virus-that-causes-it (accessed on 26 April 2020).
  2. WHO. WHO Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Dashboard. Available online: https://covid19.who.int/ (accessed on 14 March 2023).
  3. Pereira, M.; Oliveira, A.M. Poverty and Food Insecurity May Increase as the Threat of COVID-19 Spreads. Public Health Nutr. 2020, 23, 3236–3240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Zurayk, R. Pandemic and Food Security: A View from the Global South. J. Agric. Food Syst. Community Dev. 2020, 9, 17–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. HLPE. Interim Issues Paper on the Impact of COVID-19 on Food Security and Nutrition (FSN) by the High-Level Panel of Experts on Food Security and Nutrition (HLPE); HLPE: Rome, Italy, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  6. International Monetary Fund World Economic Outlook Update, June 2020: A Crisis Like No Other, an Uncertain Recovery. Available online: https://info.nicic.gov/ces/global/coronavirus-economy/crisis-no-other-uncertain-recovery (accessed on 10 May 2023).
  7. Leal Filho, W.; Brandli, L.L.; Lange Salvia, A.; Rayman-Bacchus, L.; Platje, J. COVID-19 and the UN Sustainable Development Goals: Threat to Solidarity or an Opportunity? Sustainability 2020, 12, 5343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. iPES. Food COVID-19 and the Crisis in Food Systems: Symptoms, Causes, and Potential Solutions; iPES: Verviers, Belgium, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  9. FAO. Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)—Addressing the Impacts of COVID-19 in Food Crises; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  10. One Planet Network SFS Programme Statement on the COVID-19 (Coronavirus) Crisis and Food Systems. One Planet Network’s Sustainable Food Systems (SFS) Programme. Available online: https://www.oneplanetnetwork.org/sfs-programme-statement-covid-19-coronavirus-crisis-and-food-systems (accessed on 26 April 2020).
  11. UNSCN. Food Environments in the COVID-19 Pandemic—Impacts and Positive Policy Actions to Deliver Sustainable Healthy Diets for All. Available online: https://www.unscn.org/en/news-events/recent-news?idnews=2040 (accessed on 26 April 2020).
  12. Galanakis, C.M. The Food Systems in the Era of the Coronavirus (COVID-19) Pandemic Crisis. Foods 2020, 9, 523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. El Bilali, H.; Strassner, C.; Ben Hassen, T. Sustainable Agri-food Systems: Environment, Economy, Society, and Policy. Sustainability 2021, 13, 6260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. FAO; IFAD; UNICEF; WFP; WHO. The State of Food Security and Nutrition in the World 2022; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  15. Mardones, F.O.; Rich, K.M.; Boden, L.A.; Moreno-Switt, A.I.; Caipo, M.L.; Zimin-Veselkoff, N.; Alateeqi, A.M.; Baltenweck, I. The COVID-19 Pandemic and Global Food Security. Front. Vet. Sci. 2020, 7, 578508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Vartanova, M.L. Food Supply of the Population in the Conditions of the Global Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic. Revista Inclusiones 2020, 7, 122–134. [Google Scholar]
  17. Giudice, F.; Caferra, R.; Morone, P. COVID-19, the Food System and the Circular Economy: Challenges and Opportunities. Sustainability 2020, 12, 7939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Leone, L.A.; Fleischhacker, S.; Anderson-Steeves, B.; Harper, K.; Winkler, M.; Racine, E.; Baquero, B.; Gittelsohn, J. Healthy Food Retail during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Challenges and Future Directions. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 7397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Fleischhacker, S.E.; Woteki, C.E.; Coates, P.M.; Hubbard, V.S.; Flaherty, G.E.; Glickman, D.R.; Harkin, T.R.; Kessler, D.; Li, W.W.; Loscalzo, J.; et al. Strengthening National Nutrition Research: Rationale and Options for a New Coordinated Federal Research Effort and Authority. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2020, 112, 721–769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Savary, S.; Akter, S.; Almekinders, C.; Harris, J.; Korsten, L.; Rötter, R.; Waddington, S.; Watson, D. Mapping Disruption and Resilience Mechanisms in Food Systems. Food Secur. 2020, 12, 695–717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Rippin, H.L.; Wickramasinghe, K.; Halloran, A.; Whiting, S.; Williams, J.; Hetz, K.; Pinedo, A.; Breda, J.J. Disrupted Food Systems in the WHO European Region—A Threat or Opportunity for Healthy and Sustainable Food and Nutrition? Food Secur. 2020, 12, 859–864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. United Nations Policy Brief: The Impact of COVID-19 on Food Security and Nutrition. Available online: https://unsdg.un.org/download/2262/33155 (accessed on 14 March 2023).
  23. Béné, C. Resilience of Local Food Systems and Links to Food Security—A Review of Some Important Concepts in the Context of COVID-19 and Other Shocks. Food Secur. 2020, 12, 805–822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Colafemmina, D.; El Bilali, H.; Berjan, S.; Capone, R. Food Security–Trade Nexus in Times of COVID-19 Pandemic. AGROFOR 2021, 6, 14–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Colafemmina, D.; el Bilali, H.; Capone, R. Impacts of COVID-19 on Food Security and Food System Sustainability. In Proceedings of the Book XI International Scientific Agriculture Symposium “Agrosym 2020”, Virtual Conference, 8–9 October 2020; pp. 925–933. [Google Scholar]
  26. Ben Hassen, T.; El Bilali, H. Impacts of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Food Security and Food Consumption: Preliminary Insights from the Gulf Cooperation Council Region. Cogent Soc. Sci. 2022, 8, 2064608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Ben Hassen, T.; El Bilali, H.; Allahyari, M.S. Food Shopping during the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Exploratory Study in Four Near Eastern Countries. J. Islam. Mark. 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Ben Hassen, T.; El Bilali, H.; Allahyari, M.S.; Berjan, S. Editorial: COVID-19 Pandemic, Food Behaviour and Consumption Patterns. Front. Public Health 2022, 10, 1039419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Ben Hassen, T.; El Bilali, H.; Allahyari, M.S.; Kamel, I.M.; Ben Ismail, H.; Debbabi, H.; Sassi, K. Gendered Impacts of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Food Behaviors in North Africa: Cases of Egypt, Morocco, and Tunisia. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 2192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Losso, J.N.; Losso, M.N.; Toc, M.; Inungu, J.N.; Finley, J.W. The Young Age and Plant-Based Diet Hypothesis for Low SARS-CoV-2 Infection and COVID-19 Pandemic in Sub-Saharan Africa. Plant Foods Hum. Nutr. 2021, 76, 270–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. World Bank The World Bank Data. Available online: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NV.AGR.TOTL.ZS (accessed on 14 March 2023).
  32. Olanrewaju, J.S.; Nwozor, A.; Abdulrahaman, A.A. Politicizing the Pandemic: COVID-19 and Its Impact on the Nigerian Economy. Pertanika J. Soc. Sci. Humanit. 2022, 30, 1513–1531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Amewu, S.; Asante, S.; Pauw, K.; Thurlow, J. The Economic Costs of COVID-19 in Sub-Saharan Africa: Insights from a Simulation Exercise for Ghana. Eur. J. Dev. Res. 2020, 32, 1353–1378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Kinda, R.S.; Zidouemba, P.R.; Ouedraogo, I.M. How Could the COVID-19 Pandemic Impact the Economy of Burkina Faso? Econ. Bull. 2020, 40, 2034–2046. [Google Scholar]
  35. Obayelu, A.E.; Edewor, S.E.; Ogbe, A.O. Trade Effects, Policy Responses and Opportunities of COVID-19 Outbreak in Africa. J. Chin. Econ. Foreign Trade Stud. 2021, 14, 44–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Vasseur, L.; VanVolkenburg, H.; Vandeplas, I.; Touré, K.; Sanfo, S.; Baldé, F.L. The Effects of Pandemics on the Vulnerability of Food Security in West Africa—A Scoping Review. Sustainability 2021, 13, 12888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Popoola, T.D.; Segun, P.A.; Ekuadzi, E.; Dickson, R.A.; Awotona, O.R.; Nahar, L.; Sarker, S.D.; Fatokun, A.A. West African Medicinal Plants and Their Constituent Compounds as Treatments for Viral Infections, Including SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19. DARU J. Pharm. Sci. 2022, 30, 191–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Attah, A.F.; Fagbemi, A.A.; Olubiyi, O.; Dada-Adegbola, H.; Oluwadotun, A.; Elujoba, A.; Babalola, C.P. Therapeutic Potentials of Antiviral Plants Used in Traditional African Medicine with COVID-19 in Focus: A Nigerian Perspective. Front. Pharmacol. 2021, 12, 596855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Oladele, J.O.; Ajayi, E.I.; Oyeleke, O.M.; Oladele, O.T.; Olowookere, B.D.; Adeniyi, B.M.; Oyewole, O.I.; Oladiji, A.T. A Systematic Review on COVID-19 Pandemic with Special Emphasis on Curative Potentials of Nigeria Based Medicinal Plants. Heliyon 2020, 6, e04897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. VanVolkenburg, H.; Vandeplas, I.; Touré, K.; Sanfo, S.; Baldé, F.L.; Vasseur, L. Do COVID-19 and Food Insecurity Influence Existing Inequalities between Women and Men in Africa? Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 2065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Adeyeye, S.A.O.; Ashaolu, T.J.; Bolaji, O.T.; Abegunde, T.A.; Omoyajowo, A.O. Africa and the Nexus of Poverty, Malnutrition and Diseases. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2023, 63, 641–656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Chackalackal, D.J.; Al-Aghbari, A.A.; Jang, S.Y.; Ramirez, T.R.; Vincent, J.; Joshi, A.; Banjara, M.R.; Asaga, P.; Sanchez, R.C.; Carrillo, M.A.; et al. The Covid-19 Pandemic in Low- and Middle-Income Countries, Who Carries the Burden? Review of Mass Media and Publications from Six Countries. Pathog. Glob. Health 2021, 115, 178–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Moher, D.; Liberati, A.; Tetzlaff, J.; Altman, D.G. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. PLoS Med. 2009, 6, e1000097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Page, M.J.; McKenzie, J.E.; Bossuyt, P.M.; Boutron, I.; Hoffmann, T.C.; Mulrow, C.D.; Shamseer, L.; Tetzlaff, J.M.; Akl, E.A.; Brennan, S.E.; et al. The PRISMA 2020 Statement: An Updated Guideline for Reporting Systematic Reviews. BMJ 2021, 88, 105906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. El Bilali, H. Organic Food and Farming in West Africa: A Systematic Review. Landbauforsch.—J. Sustain. Org. Agric. Syst. 2021, 70, 94–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. el Bilali, H.; Dambo, L.; Nanema, J.; Bassole, I.H.N.; Calabrese, G. Biodiversity-Pastoralism Nexus in West Africa. AIMS Agric. Food 2022, 7, 73–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Agyei-Holmes, A.; Ankrah, D.A.; Boakye, A.A. COVID-19 and Ghana’s Agri-Food System: An Assessment of Resilience. Afr. Geogr. Rev. 2023, 42, 85–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Balana, B.B.; Ogunniyi, A.; Oyeyemi, M.; Fasoranti, A.; Edeh, H.; Andam, K. COVID-19, Food Insecurity and Dietary Diversity of Households: Survey Evidence from Nigeria. Food Secur. 2023, 15, 219–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Bamidele, O.; Akinsola, O.M.; Yakubu, A.; Hassan, W.A.; Ogundu, U.E.; Amole, T.A. Growth Performance, Survivability and Profitability of Improved Smallholder Chicken Genetics in Nigeria: A COVID-19 Intervention Study. Front. Genet. 2023, 13, 1033654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Jha, P.K.; Middendorf, G.; Faye, A.; Middendorf, B.J.; Prasad, P.V.V. Lives and Livelihoods in Smallholder Farming Systems of Senegal: Impacts, Adaptation, and Resilience to COVID-19. Land 2023, 12, 178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Aberese-Ako, M.; Immurana, M.; Dalaba, M.A.; Anumu, F.E.Y.; Ofosu, A.; Gyapong, M. The Socio-Economic and Health Effects of COVID-19 among Rural and Urban-Slum Dwellers in Ghana: A Mixed Methods Approach. PLoS ONE 2022, 17, e0271551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Aggarwal, S.; Jeong, D.; Kumar, N.; Park, D.S.; Robinson, J.; Spearot, A. COVID-19 Market Disruptions and Food Security: Evidence from Households in Rural Liberia and Malawi. PLoS ONE 2022, 17, e0271488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Amoako, M.; Amoah-Agyei, F.; Mensah, G.O.; Du, C.; Sergin, S.; Fenton, J.I.; Tucker, R.M. Effects of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Health Behaviors of Higher Education Students in Ghana: A Cross-Sectional Study. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 16442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Asante, D.; Twumasi, M.A.; Sakyi, A.S.K.; Gyamerah, S.; Asante, B. A Socio-Geographic Perspective of Health and Economic Impacts of COVID-19 on Poor Households in Ghana. GeoJournal 2022, 87, 4113–4125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Bamiwuye, O.; Akintunde, O.; Jimoh, L.; Olanrewaju, K. Perceived Changes in Food Security, Finances and Revenue of Rural and Urban Households during COVID-19 Pandemic in Nigeria. Agrekon 2022, 61, 282–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Bukari, C.; Aning-Agyei, M.A.; Kyeremeh, C.; Essilfie, G.; Amuquandoh, K.F.; Owusu, A.A.; Otoo, I.C.; Bukari, K.I. Effect of COVID-19 on Household Food Insecurity and Poverty: Evidence from Ghana. Soc. Indic. Res. 2022, 159, 991–1015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Dasgupta, S.; Robinson, E.J.Z. Impact of COVID-19 on Food Insecurity Using Multiple Waves of High Frequency Household Surveys. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 1865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Folayan, M.O.; Ibigbami, O.; Brown, B.; el Tantawi, M.; Uzochukwu, B.; Ezechi, O.C.; Aly, N.M.; Abeldaño, G.F.; Ara, E.; Ayanore, M.A.; et al. Differences in COVID-19 Preventive Behavior and Food Insecurity by HIV Status in Nigeria. AIDS Behav. 2022, 26, 739–751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Folorunso, A.; Olu-Lawal, F.; Omoniyi, S. Nutritional Knowledge and Immunity-Boosting Food Consumption Patterns before and after the COVID-19 Pandemic Lockdown Periods in Osun State, Nigeria. Nutr. Health 2022, 28, 761–769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Gligorić, K.; Chiolero, A.; Kıcıman, E.; White, R.W.; West, R. Population-Scale Dietary Interests during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 1073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Iheme, G.O.; Adile, A.D.; Egechizuorom, I.M.; Kupoluyi, O.E.; Ogbonna, O.C.; Olah, L.E.; Enuka, H.C.; Idris, H.; Asouzu, N.C.; Oyebamiji, E.A. Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on Food Price Index in Nigeria. Future Food-J. Food Agric. Soc. 2022, 10, 3. [Google Scholar]
  62. Kuuwill, A.; Kimengsi, J.N.; Campion, B.B. Pandemic-Induced Shocks and Shifts in Forest-Based Livelihood Strategies: Learning from COVID-19 in the Bia West District of Ghana. Environ. Res. Lett. 2022, 17, 064033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Lamontagne, E.; Folayan, M.O.; Arije, O.; Enemo, A.; Sunday, A.; Muhammad, A.; Nyako, H.Y.; Abdullah, R.M.; Okiwu, H.; Undelikwo, V.A.; et al. The Effects of COVID-19 on Food Insecurity, Financial Vulnerability and Housing Insecurity among Women and Girls Living with or at Risk of HIV in Nigeria. Afr. J. AIDS Res. 2022, 21, 297–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Martey, E.; Etwire, P.M.; Adzawla, W.; Atakora, W.; Bindraban, P.S. Perceptions of COVID-19 Shocks and Adoption of Sustainable Agricultural Practices in Ghana. J. Environ. Manag. 2022, 320, 115810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Middendorf, B.J.; Traoré, H.; Middendorf, G.; Jha, P.K.; Yonli, D.; Palé, S.; Prasad, P.V.V. Impacts of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Vegetable Production Systems and Livelihoods: Smallholder Farmer Experiences in Burkina Faso. Food Energy Secur. 2022, 11, e337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Mueller, V.; Grépin, K.A.; Rabbani, A.; Navia, B.; Ngunjiri, A.S.W.; Wu, N. Food Insecurity and COVID-19 Risk in Low- and Middle-Income Countries. Appl. Econ. Perspect. Policy 2022, 44, 92–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Odebunmi, C.A.; Adetunji, T.L.; Adetunji, A.E.; Olatunde, A.; Oluwole, O.E.; Adewale, I.A.; Ejiwumi, A.O.; Iheme, C.E.; Aremu, T.O. Ethnobotanical Survey of Medicinal Plants Used in the Treatment of COVID-19 and Related Respiratory Infections in Ogbomosho South and North Local Government Areas, Oyo State, Nigeria. Plants 2022, 11, 2667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Omeje, E.; Okpukpara, B.; Okereke, C.; Ume, C.; Okpukpara, V. Incentivizing the Adoption of Biofortified Rice for Increasing Farmers’ Productivity and Income During COVID19 Era: Evidence from Smallholder Farmers in Nigeria. Sci. Pap.-Ser. Manag. Econ. Eng. Agric. Rural. Dev. 2022, 22, 497–510. [Google Scholar]
  69. Omidiji, J.; Samuel, U.; Busayo, F.; Ayeni, A. Investigating the Impacts of COVID-19 Safety Measures and Related Uncertainties among Socially Vulnerable Groups in Lagos Megacity. Heliyon 2022, 8, e10090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Omotayo, A.O.; Omotoso, A.B.; Daud, S.A.; Omotayo, O.P.; Adeniyi, B.A. Rising Food Prices and Farming Households Food Insecurity during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Policy Implications from SouthWest Nigeria. Agriculture 2022, 12, 363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Onyenweaku, E.O.; Kesa, H.; Tchuenchieu, A.K.; Kuhudzai, A.G. Effect of the Coronavirus Pandemic on Nutrition and Health of Adults in Calabar, Nigeria: A Post-Lockdown Analysis. Health SA Gesondheid 2022, 27, a1876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Onyenweaku, E.O.; Tchuenchieu, A.K.; Kesa, H. COVID-19 Preventives Consumed in South Africa versus Other Sub-Saharan African Countries. Health SA Gesondheid 2022, 27, a2061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Ouoba, Y.; Sawadogo, N. Food Security, Poverty and Household Resilience to COVID-19 in Burkina Faso: Evidence from Urban Small Traders’ Households. World Dev. Perspect. 2022, 25, 100387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Ragasa, C.; Agyakwah, S.K.; Asmah, R.; Mensah, E.T.-D.; Amewu, S.; Oyih, M. Accelerating Pond Aquaculture Development and Resilience beyond COVID: Ensuring Food and Jobs in Ghana. Aquaculture 2022, 547, 737476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Rudin-Rush, L.; Michler, J.D.; Josephson, A.; Bloem, J.R. Food Insecurity during the First Year of the COVID-19 Pandemic in Four African Countries. Food Policy 2022, 111, 102306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Tchuenchieu Kamgain, A.D.; Kesa, H.; Onyenweaku, E.O. Food Safety Behavioural Changes among the Population in Sub-Saharan Africa during the COVID-19 First Wave. Heliyon 2022, 8, e09785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Traoré, O.; Combary, O.S.; dD Zina, Y. Households’ Basic Needs Satisfaction during the Coronavirus Disease 19 (COVID-19) Pandemic in Burkina Faso. Health Policy Open 2022, 3, 100060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Wrabel, M.; Stokes-Walters, R.; King, S.; Funnell, G.; Stobaugh, H. Programmatic Adaptations to Acute Malnutrition Screening and Treatment during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Matern. Child. Nutr. 2022, 18, e13406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Abay, K.A.; Amare, M.; Tiberti, L.; Andam, K.S. COVID-19-Induced Disruptions of School Feeding Services Exacerbate Food Insecurity in Nigeria. J. Nutr. 2021, 151, 2245–2254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Adebayo, T.S.; Oluwamayowa, L. COVID-19 and Food Security as Catalyst of Conflict among Rural Households in Nigeria: A Study of Ilaje Community, Ondo State. J. Aggress. Confl. Peace Res. 2021, 13, 169–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Adenubi, O.T.; Adebowale, O.O.; Oloye, A.A.; Bankole, N.O.; Ayo-Ajayi, P.O.; Akinloye, A.K. University Community-Based Survey on the Knowledge, Attitude and Perception about COVID-19 Pandemic: The Federal University of Agriculture, Abeokuta, Nigeria as a Case Study. J. Prev. Med. Hyg. 2021, 62, 575–585. [Google Scholar]
  82. Adewopo, J.B.; Solano-Hermosilla, G.; Colen, L.; Micale, F. Using Crowd-Sourced Data for Real-Time Monitoring of Food Prices during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Insights from a Pilot Project in Northern Nigeria. Glob. Food Secur. 2021, 29, 100523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Adjognon, G.S.; Bloem, J.R.; Sanoh, A. The Coronavirus Pandemic and Food Security: Evidence from Mali. Food Policy 2021, 101, 102050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Agbawodikeizu, P.U.; Ezulike, C.D.; Ekoh, P.C.; George, E.O.; Okoye, U.O.; Nnebe, I. Exploring the Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on Economic Activities and Well-Being of Older Adults in South-Eastern Nigeria: Lessons for Gerontological Social Workers. J. Gerontol. Soc. Work. 2021, 64, 613–628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Agyei, S.K.; Isshaq, Z.; Frimpong, S.; Adam, A.M.; Bossman, A.; Asiamah, O. COVID-19 and Food Prices in Sub-Saharan Africa. Afr. Dev. Rev. 2021, 33, S102–S113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Amare, M.; Abay, K.A.; Tiberti, L.; Chamberlin, J. COVID-19 and Food Security: Panel Data Evidence from Nigeria. Food Policy 2021, 101, 102099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Andrieu, N.; Hossard, L.; Graveline, N.; Dugue, P.; Guerra, P.; Chirinda, N. Covid-19 Management by Farmers and Policymakers in Burkina Faso, Colombia and France: Lessons for Climate Action. Agric. Syst. 2021, 190, 103092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Asante-Poku, N.A.; van Huellen, S. Commodity Exporter’s Vulnerabilities in Times of COVID-19: The Case of Ghana. Can. J. Dev. Stud./Rev. Can. D’études Du Développement 2021, 42, 122–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Ayande, R.E.A.; Chilufya, J. Two African Immigrant Graduate Students Reflect on Food Access, Food (in)Security, and Community during the Pandemic. Food Foodways 2021, 29, 391–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Baada, J.N.; Antabe, R.; Sano, Y. Differentiated Agrarian Vulnerabilities and Generalized National Responses to COVID-19 in the Upper West Region of Ghana. J. Agrar. Chang. 2021, 21, 604–619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Bamidele, O.; Amole, T.A. Impact of COVID-19 on Smallholder Poultry Farmers in Nigeria. Sustainability 2021, 13, 11475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Chiemela, C.J.; Chiemela, S.N.; Mukaila, R.; Ukwuaba, I.C.; Nwokolo, C.C. Effects of COVID-19 on Small-Scale Agribusiness in Enugu State, Nigeria. Sci. Pap.—Ser. Manag. Econ. Eng. Agric. Rural. Dev. 2021, 21, 255–263. [Google Scholar]
  93. Coulibaly, S. COVID-19 Policy Responses, Inflation and Spillover Effects in the West African Economic and Monetary Union. Afr. Dev. Rev. 2021, 33, S139–S151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Dasgupta, S.; Robinson, E.J.Z. Food Insecurity, Safety Nets, and Coping Strategies during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Multi-Country Evidence from Sub-Saharan Africa. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 9997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Davis, E.J.; Amorim, G.; Dahn, B.; Moon, T.D. Perceived Ability to Comply with National COVID-19 Mitigation Strategies and Their Impact on Household Finances, Food Security, and Mental Well-Being of Medical and Pharmacy Students in Liberia. PLoS ONE 2021, 16, e0254446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. de Boef, W.S.; Borman, G.D.; Gupta, A.; Subedi, A.; Thijssen, M.H.; Ayana Aga, A.; Hassena Beko, M.; Thein, S.Z.M.; Thein, W.; Okelola, F.; et al. Rapid Assessments of the Impact of COVID-19 on the Availability of Quality Seed to Farmers: Advocating Immediate Practical, Remedial and Preventative Action. Agric. Syst. 2021, 188, 103037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Dear, N.; Duff, E.; Esber, A.; Parikh, A.; Iroezindu, M.; Bahemana, E.; Kibuuka, H.; Owuoth, J.; Maswai, J.; Crowell, T.A.; et al. Transient Reductions in Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) Clinic Attendance and Food Security During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Pandemic for People Living with HIV in 4 African Countries. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2021, 73, 1901–1905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Dugué, P.; Kohio, E.N.; Tiemtoré, J. L’agriculture Burkinabè Face à La Crise de La COVID-19: Cas Des Régions Du Yatenga et Des Hauts-Bassins. Cah. Agric. 2021, 30, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Eboreime, E.; Iyamu, I.; Afirima, B.; Okechukwu, E.; Kibombwe, G.I.; Oladele, T.; Tafuma, T.; Badejo, O.-O.; Ashiono, E.; Mpofu, M.; et al. COVID-19 Risk Perception among Residents of Seven Sub-Saharan African Countries: Socio-Demographic Correlates and Predicted Probabilities. Pan Afr. Med. J. 2021, 39, 227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Egger, D.; Miguel, E.; Warren, S.S.; Shenoy, A.; Collins, E.; Karlan, D.; Parkerson, D.; Mobarak, A.M.; Fink, G.; Udry, C.; et al. Falling Living Standards during the COVID-19 Crisis: Quantitative Evidence from Nine Developing Countries. Sci. Adv. 2021, 7, eabe0997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  101. Ekoh, P.C.; Ejimkaraonye, C.; George, E.O.; Agbawodikeizu, P.U. “Better to Die of Disease than Die of Hunger”: The Experience of Igwes (Traditional Rulers) in the Fight against the COVID-19 Pandemic in Rural South-East Nigeria. Rural. Remote Health 2021, 21, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Folayan, M.O.; Ibigbami, O.; el Tantawi, M.; Brown, B.; Aly, N.M.; Ezechi, O.; Abeldaño, G.F.; Ara, E.; Ayanore, M.A.; Ellakany, P.; et al. Factors Associated with Financial Security, Food Security and Quality of Daily Lives of Residents in Nigeria during the First Wave of the COVID-19 Pandemic. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 7925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Gummerson, E.; Cardona, C.; Anglewicz, P.; Zachary, B.; Guiella, G.; Radloff, S. The Wealth Gradient and the Effect of COVID-19 Restrictions on Income Loss, Food Insecurity and Health Care Access in Four Sub-Saharan African Geographies. PLoS ONE 2021, 16, e0260823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Hemler, E.C.; Korte, M.L.; Lankoande, B.; Millogo, O.; Assefa, N.; Chukwu, A.; Workneh, F.; Tinkasimile, A.; Lyatuu, I.; Soura, A.; et al. Design and Field Methods of the ARISE Network COVID-19 Rapid Monitoring Survey. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2021, 105, 310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Houessou, M.D.; Cassee, A.; Sonneveld, B.G.J.S. The Effects of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Food Security in Rural and Urban Settlements in Benin: Do Allotment Gardens Soften the Blow? Sustainability 2021, 13, 7313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Ilesanmi, F.F.; Ilesanmi, O.S.; Afolabi, A.A. The Effects of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Food Losses in the Agricultural Value Chains in Africa: The Nigerian Case Study. Public Health Pract. 2021, 2, 100087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Inegbedion, H.E. COVID-19 Lockdown: Implication for Food Security. J. Agribus. Dev. Emerg. Econ. 2021, 11, 437–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Jha, P.K.; Araya, A.; Stewart, Z.P.; Faye, A.; Traore, H.; Middendorf, B.J.; Prasad, P.V.V. Projecting Potential Impact of COVID-19 on Major Cereal Crops in Senegal and Burkina Faso Using Crop Simulation Models. Agric. Syst. 2021, 190, 103107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Josephson, A.; Kilic, T.; Michler, J.D. Socioeconomic Impacts of COVID-19 in Low-Income Countries. Nat. Hum. Behav. 2021, 5, 557–565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Kasim, O.F.; Oyedotun, T.D.T.; Famewo, A.; Oyedotun, T.D.; Moonsammy, S.; Ally, N.; Renn-Moonsammy, D.-M. Household Waste Generation, Change in Waste Composition and the Exposure to COVID-19 in Guyana and Nigeria. Sci. Afr. 2021, 14, e01060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Liverpool-Tasie, L.S.O.; Reardon, T.; Belton, B. “Essential Non-Essentials”: COVID-19 Policy Missteps in Nigeria Rooted in Persistent Myths about African Food Supply Chains. Appl. Econ. Perspect. Policy 2021, 43, 205–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Madzorera, I.; Ismail, A.; Hemler, E.C.; Korte, M.L.; Olufemi, A.A.; Wang, D.; Assefa, N.; Workneh, F.; Lankoande, B.; Chukwu, A.; et al. Impact of COVID-19 on Nutrition, Food Security, and Dietary Diversity and Quality in Burkina Faso, Ethiopia and Nigeria. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2021, 105, 295–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Mertens, E.; Peñalvo, J.L. The Burden of Malnutrition and Fatal COVID-19: A Global Burden of Disease Analysis. Front. Nutr. 2021, 7, 619850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Middendorf, B.J.; Faye, A.; Middendorf, G.; Stewart, Z.P.; Jha, P.K.; Prasad, P.V.V. Smallholder Farmer Perceptions about the Impact of COVID-19 on Agriculture and Livelihoods in Senegal. Agric. Syst. 2021, 190, 103108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Nchanji, E.B.; Lutomia, C.K. Regional Impact of COVID-19 on the Production and Food Security of Common Bean Smallholder Farmers in Sub-Saharan Africa: Implication for SDG’s. Glob. Food Secur. 2021, 29, 100524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Nkrumah, R.K.; Andoh, F.K.; Sebu, J.; Annim, S.K.; Mwinlaaru, P.Y. COVID-19 Water and Electricity Subsidies in Ghana: How Do the Poor Benefit? Sci. Afr. 2021, 14, e01038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Obayelu, A.E.; Obayelu, O.A.; Bolarinwa, K.K.; Oyeyinka, R.A. Assessment of the Immediate and Potential Long-Term Effects of COVID-19 Outbreak on Socioeconomics, Agriculture, Security of Food and Dietary Intake in Nigeria. Food Ethics 2021, 6, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Ogunji, J.; Iheanacho, S.; Ogunji, C.V.; Olaolu, M.; Oleforuh-Okoleh, V.; Amaechi, N.; David, E.; Ndukauba, O.; Ikegwu, T.M.; Biamba, C.; et al. Counting the Cost: The Effect of COVID-19 Lockdown on Households in South East Nigeria. Sustainability 2021, 13, 12417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Okonkwo, U.U.; Ukaogo, V.O.; Ejikeme, J.N.U.; Okagu, G.; Onu, A. COVID-19 and the Food Deficit Economy in Southeastern Nigeria. Cogent Arts Humanit. 2021, 8, 1909893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Saah, F.I.; Amu, H.; Seidu, A.-A.; Bain, L.E. Health Knowledge and Care Seeking Behaviour in Resource-Limited Settings amidst the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Qualitative Study in Ghana. PLoS ONE 2021, 16, e0250940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Ukaro Ofuoku, A.; Peter Opia, B.O.; Aramide Ikpoza, E. Impact of COVID-19-Induced Rural-Rural Migration on Agricultural Productivity in Delta State, Nigeria. Sci. Agropecu. 2021, 12, 49–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Vall, E.; Mburu, J.; Ndambi, A.; Sall, C.; Camara, A.D.; Sow, A.; Ba, K.; Corniaux, C.; Diaw, A.; Seck, D.; et al. Early Effects of the COVID-19 Outbreak on the African Dairy Industry: Cases of Burkina Faso, Kenya, Madagascar, and Senegal. Cah. Agric. 2021, 30, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Van Hoyweghen, K.; Fabry, A.; Feyaerts, H.; Wade, I.; Maertens, M. Resilience of Global and Local Value Chains to the Covid-19 Pandemic: Survey Evidence from Vegetable Value Chains in Senegal. Agric. Econ. 2021, 52, 423–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Wang, D.; Chukwu, A.; Millogo, O.; Assefa, N.; James, C.; Young, T.; Lankoande, B.; Workneh, F.; Hemler, E.C.; Korte, M.L.; et al. The COVID-19 Pandemic and Adolescents’ Experience in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Cross-Country Study Using a Telephone Survey. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2021, 105, 331–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Yaw Codjoe, F.N.; Debrah, K.A.; Osei-Asare, Y.B. Food Vending Safety Concerns: Consumer Perception on Fresh Coconut in New Juaben South Municipality of Ghana. Cogent Food Agric. 2021, 7, 1914908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Yegbemey, R.N.; Komlan Ahihou, C.M.; Olorunnipa, I.; Benali, M.; Afari-Sefa, V.; Schreinemachers, P. COVID-19 Effects and Resilience of Vegetable Farmers in North-Western Nigeria. Agronomy 2021, 11, 1808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Afriyie, D.K.; Asare, G.A.; Amponsah, S.K.; Godman, B. COVID-19 Pandemic in Resource-Poor Countries: Challenges, Experiences and Opportunities in Ghana. J. Infect. Dev. Ctries. 2020, 14, 838–843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  128. Arouna, A.; Soullier, G.; Mendez del Villar, P.; Demont, M. Policy Options for Mitigating Impacts of COVID-19 on Domestic Rice Value Chains and Food Security in West Africa. Glob. Food Secur. 2020, 26, 100405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Buonsenso, D.; Cinicola, B.; Raffaelli, F.; Sollena, P.; Iodice, F. Social Consequences of COVID-19 in a Low Resource Setting in Sierra Leone, West Africa. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 2020, 97, 23–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  130. Igwe, P.A.; Ochinanwata, C.; Ochinanwata, N.; Adeyeye, J.O.; Ikpor, I.M.; Nwakpu, S.E.; Egbo, O.P.; Onyishi, I.E.; Vincent, O.; Nwekpa, K.C.; et al. Solidarity and Social Behaviour: How Did This Help Communities to Manage COVID-19 Pandemic? Int. J. Sociol. Soc. Policy 2020, 40, 1183–1200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Okyere, I.; Chuku, E.O.; Ekumah, B.; Angnuureng, D.B.; Boakye-Appiah, J.K.; Mills, D.J.; Babanawo, R.; Asare, N.K.; Aheto, D.W.; Crawford, B. Physical Distancing and Risk of COVID-19 in Small-Scale Fisheries: A Remote Sensing Assessment in Coastal Ghana. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 22407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Zidouemba, P.R.; Kinda, S.R.; Ouedraogo, I.M. Could Covid-19 Worsen Food Insecurity in Burkina Faso? Eur. J. Dev. Res. 2020, 32, 1379–1401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. El Bilali, H. Research on Agro-Food Sustainability Transitions: Where Are Food Security and Nutrition? Food Secur. 2019, 11, 559–577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Table 1. COVID-19 pandemic in West Africa.
Table 1. COVID-19 pandemic in West Africa.
CountryConfirmed Cases *Deaths *Vaccine Doses Administered *Population (Thousands, 2021)
Benin27,9991634,232,54112,996.90
Burkina Faso22,0563965,856,00322,100.68
Cabo Verde/Cape Verde63,244413859,940587.92
Côte d’Ivoire/Ivory Coast88,20883425,263,93227,478.25
Gambia12,5983721,444,4922639.92
Ghana171,172146222,384,22632,833.03
Guinea38,26746710,624,84913,531.91
Guinea-Bissau8960176593,5082060.72
Liberia80902944,460,6685193.42
Mali33,0517434,916,56821,904.98
Mauritania63,4399974,068,5304614.97
Niger95133157,241,94225,252.72
Nigeria266,5983155111,985,403213,401.32
Senegal88,92119712,929,54716,876.72
Sierra Leone77601257,009,9058420.64
Togo39,3822903,398,4458644.83
SourceWHO [2]World Bank [31]
* As of 7 March 2023.
Table 2. Agriculture and food insecurity in West African countries.
Table 2. Agriculture and food insecurity in West African countries.
CountryAgriculture, Forestry, and Fishing, Value Added (% of GDP)—2019Employment in Agriculture (% of Total Employment)—2019Prevalence of Undernourishment (% Population)Prevalence of Moderate or Severe Food Insecurity (% Population)
2017–20192019–20212017–20192019–2021
Benin26.9387.47.4n.a.67.9
Burkina Faso18.42619.218.047.752.6
Cabo Verde 4.61118.517.737.735.4
Côte d’Ivoire 20.74019.94.4 42.8
Gambia20.02711.921.654.358.0
Ghana17.3306.54.151.136.6
Guinea26.461n.a.n.a.74.173.3
Guinea-Bissau30.460n.a.31.7n.a.75.0
Liberia36.44337.538.388.580.6
Mali37.3625.19.8n.a.n.a.
Mauritania21.73111.910.144.845.3
Niger36.973n.a.19.8 n.a.
Nigeria21.93512.612.744.158.5
Senegal14.9309.47.540.749.2
Sierra Leone58.25426.027.481.486.7
Togo19.83220.718.8 62.5
SourceWorld Bank [31]FAO [14]FAO et al. [14]FAO [14]FAO et al. [14]
n.a. No available data
Table 3. Eligible articles selection steps and process.
Table 3. Eligible articles selection steps and process.
Selection StepNumber of Documents SelectedNumber of Documents Excluded and Reasons for Exclusion
Search on WoS 176No duplicate
Screening of records based on titles 1767 documents were discarded because they deal with countries outside West Africa, e.g., Kenya, Malawi, Namibia, Papua New Guinea, Sao Tome and Principe, Tanzania, and Uganda
Screening of records based on abstracts16974 documents excluded:
  • 10 documents not dealing with West Africa/West African countries
  • 14 documents not dealing with COVID-19
  • 34 documents not addressing agri-food systems
  • 4 documents without abstracts
  • 12 editorial materials
Scrutiny of full texts 958 documents excluded:
  • 1 document not dealing with West Africa
  • 7 reviews
Confirmation of eligibility and inclusion in the systematic review87
Table 4. List of the selected articles.
Table 4. List of the selected articles.
YearNumber of DocumentsReferences
2023 *4Agyei-Holmes et al. [47]; Balana et al. [48]; Bamidele et al. [49]; Jha et al. [50]
202228Aberese-Ako et al. [51]; Aggarwal et al. [52]; Amoako et al. [53]; Asante et al. [54]; Bamiwuye et al. [55]; Bukari et al. [56]; Dasgupta and Robinson [57]; Folayan et al. [58]; Folorunso et al. [59]; Gligorić et al. [60]; Iheme et al. [61]; Kuuwill et al. [62]; Lamontagne et al. [63]; Martey et al. [64]; Middendorf et al. [65]; Mueller et al. [66]; Odebunmi et al. [67]; Omeje et al. [68]; Omidiji et al. [69]; Omotayo et al. [70]; Onyenweaku et al. [71]; Onyenweaku et al. [72]; Ouoba and Sawadogo [73]; Ragasa et al. [74]; Rudin-Rush et al. [75]; Tchuenchieu Kamgain et al. [76]; Traoré et al. [77]; Wrabel et al. [78]
202148Abay et al. [79]; Adebayo and Oluwamayowa [80]; Adenubi et al. [81]; Adewopo et al. [82]; Adjognon et al. [83]; Agbawodikeizu et al. [84]; Agyei et al. [85]; Amare et al. [86]; Andrieu et al. [87]; Asante-Poku and van Huellen [88]; Ayande and Chilufya [89]; Baada et al. [90]; Bamidele and Amole [91]; Chiemela et al. [92]; Coulibaly [93]; Dasgupta and Robinson [94]; Davis et al. [95]; de Boef et al. [96]; Dear et al. [97]; Dugué et al. [98]; Eboreime et al. [99]; Egger et al. [100]; Ekoh et al. [101]; Folayan et al. [102]; Gummerson et al. [103]; Hemler et al. [104]; Houessou et al. [105]; Ilesanmi et al. [106]; Inegbedion [107]; Jha et al. [108]; Josephson et al. [109]; Kasim et al. [110]; Liverpool-Tasie et al. [111]; Madzorera et al. [112]; Mertens and Peñalvo [113]; Middendorf et al. [114]; Nchanji and Lutomia [115]; Nkrumah et al. [116]; Obayelu et al. [117]; Ogunji et al. [118]; Okonkwo et al. [119]; Saah et al. [120]; Ukaro Ofuoku et al. [121]; Vall et al. [122]; Van Hoyweghen et al. [123]; Wang et al. [124]; Yaw Codjoe et al. [125]; Yegbemey et al. [126]
20207Afriyie et al. [127]; Arouna et al. [128]; Buonsenso et al. [129]; Igwe et al. [130]; Kinda et al. [34]; Okyere et al. [131]; Zidouemba et al. [132]
* As of 2 March 2023.
Table 5. Analyses undergone by the eligible documents.
Table 5. Analyses undergone by the eligible documents.
ItemDescriptionUsed Method References
Bibliographical metricsSources/journals, research areas, authors, affiliation institutions/organisations, and countries El Bilali [45] and El Bilali et al. [46]
Research geographyWest African countries where studies were performedEl Bilali [45] and El Bilali et al. [46]
Agriculture subsectorsCrop production (and main crops addressed), animal production/pastoralism, and fisheries/aquacultureEl Bilali [45] and El Bilali et al. [46]
Food chain stages Production, processing, distribution/retail/marketing, consumption, and waste managementEl Bilali [45] and El Bilali et al. [46]
Food security Food security dimensions/pillars: availability, access, utilisation/use, and stability El Bilali [133] and El Bilali [45]
Sustainability Sustainability dimensions: environment, economy, society, and policy and governanceEl Bilali et al. [13]
Table 6. Metrics of research on the impacts of the pandemic on agri-food systems in West Africa: top ten sources/journals, research areas, authors, affiliation countries/regions and affiliation institutions.
Table 6. Metrics of research on the impacts of the pandemic on agri-food systems in West Africa: top ten sources/journals, research areas, authors, affiliation countries/regions and affiliation institutions.
Journals (a *)Research Areas (b *)Authors (c *)Affiliation Countries/Regions (d *)Affiliation Institutions (e *)
PLoS ONE (5)Agriculture (21)Jha P.K. (4)Nigeria (30)CGIAR (10)
Agricultural Systems (4)Science technology (15)Middendorf B.J. (4)USA (28)University of Ibadan (7)
American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene (3) Occupational health (13)Prasad P.V.V. (4)Ghana (16)University of Nigeria (7)
Food Policy (3)Business Economics (10)Assefa N. (3)Burkina Faso (11)University of Cape Coast (5)
Global Food Security: Agriculture Policy, Economics and Environment (3)Food science technology (10)Berhane Y. (3)England (9)University of Ghana (5)
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (3) Environmental sciences—Ecology (9)Chukwu A. (3)South Africa (8)University of London (5)
Sustainability (3) Development studies (6)Fawzi W.W. (3)Kenya (7)Centre de coopération internationale en recherche agronomique pour le développement—CIRAD (4)
African Development Review—Revue Africaine de Développement (2) Infectious diseases (6)Faye A. (3)Canada (6)Harvard University (4)
Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy (2) Nutrition dietetics (6)Folayan M.O. (3) Netherlands (6)Kansas State University (4)
Cahiers Agricultures, Heliyon, Scientific African, Scientific Papers Series, Scientific Reports (2)Sociology (3)Hemler E.C., Korte M.L., Lankoande B., Middendorf G., Oduola A., Sie A., Wang D.Q., Workneh F. (3)Ethiopia, France, Senegal (5)Obafemi Awolowo University, Universite de Montpellier (4)
* Numbers in brackets indicate the number of articles.
Table 7. Geography of research on the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on agriculture and food systems in Western Africa.
Table 7. Geography of research on the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on agriculture and food systems in Western Africa.
Country or Region (Articles Number)Documents
Benin (1)Houessou et al. [105]
Burkina Faso (6)Dugué et al. [98]; Kinda et al. [34]; Middendorf et al. [65]; Ouoba and Sawadogo [73]; Traoré et al. [77]; Zidouemba et al. [132]
Ghana (15)Aberese-Ako et al. [51]; Afriyie et al. [127]; Agyei-Holmes et al. [47]; Amoako et al. [53]; Asante et al. [54]; Asante-Poku and van Huellen [88]; Baada et al. [90]; Bukari et al. [56]; Kuuwill et al. [62]; Martey et al. [64]; Nkrumah et al. [116]; Okyere et al. [131]; Ragasa et al. [74]; Saah et al. [120]; Yaw Codjoe et al. [125]
Liberia (1)Davis et al. [95]
Mali (1)Adjognon et al. [83]
Nigeria (31)Abay et al. [79]; Adebayo and Oluwamayowa [80]; Adenubi et al. [81]; Adewopo et al. [82]; Agbawodikeizu et al. [84]; Amare et al. [86]; Balana et al. [48]; Bamidele and Amole [91]; Bamidele et al. [49]; Bamiwuye et al. [55]; Chiemela et al. [92]; Ekoh et al. [101]; Folayan et al. [102]; Folayan et al. [58]; Folorunso et al. [59]; Igwe et al. [130]; Iheme et al. [61]; Ilesanmi et al. [106]; Inegbedion [107]; Lamontagne et al. [63]; Liverpool-Tasie et al. [111]; Obayelu et al. [117]; Odebunmi et al. [67]; Ogunji et al. [118]; Okonkwo et al. [119]; Omeje et al. [68]; Omidiji et al. [69]; Omotayo et al. [70]; Onyenweaku et al. [71]; Ukaro Ofuoku et al. [121]; Yegbemey et al. [126]
Senegal (3)Jha et al. [50]; Middendorf et al. [114]; Van Hoyweghen et al. [123]
Sierra Leone (1)Buonsenso et al. [129]
West Africa * (3)Arouna et al. [128]—Burkina Faso, Benin, Cote d’Ivoire, Ghana, Guinea-Bissau, Guinea, Liberia, Mali, Mauritania, Niger, Nigeria, Sierra Leone, Senegal, Gambia, and Togo; Coulibaly [93]—Benin, Burkina Faso, Guinea-Bissau, Ivory Coast, Mali, Niger, Senegal, and Togo; Jha et al. [108]—Senegal and Burkina Faso
Sub-Saharan Africa ** (16)Aggarwal et al. [52]—Liberia and Malawi; Ayande and Chilufya [89]—Ghana and Zambia; Dasgupta and Robinson [94]—Chad, Djibouti, Ethiopia, Kenya, Mali, Malawi, Nigeria, South Africa and Uganda; Dear et al. [97]—Kenya, Nigeria, Tanzania, Uganda; Eboreime et al. [99]—Botswana, Kenya, Malawi, Nigeria, Tanzania, Zambia and Zimbabwe; Gummerson et al. [103]—Kenya and Burkina Faso, Democratic Republic of Congo (RDC) and Nigeria; Hemler et al. [104]—Burkina Faso, Ethiopia, and Nigeria; Josephson et al. [109]— Malawi, Ethiopia, Nigeria and Uganda; Madzorera et al. [112]—Burkina Faso, Ethiopia and Nigeria; Mueller et al. [66]—Bangladesh, Kenya and Nigeria; Nchanji and Lutomia [115]—Burkina Faso, Burundi, Cameroon, Eswatini, Kenya, Lesotho, Madagascar, Tanzania, Uganda, Zambia, and Zimbabwe; Onyenweaku et al. [72]—South Africa, Cameroon, Nigeria, Ghana, Ethiopia, and Kenya; Rudin-Rush et al. [75]—Burkina Faso, Ethiopia, Malawi, and Nigeria; Tchuenchieu Kamgain et al. [76]—Cameroon, Ethiopia, Ghana, Kenya, Nigeria, and South Africa; Vall et al. [122]—Burkina Faso, Kenya, Madagascar, and Senegal; Wang et al. [124]—Burkina Faso, Ethiopia, and Nigeria
Global *** (9) Agyei et al. [85]—Benin, Botswana, Burkina Faso, Burundi, Cabo Verde, Cameroon, Chad, DRC, Ethiopia, Ghana, Guinea, Ivory Coast, Liberia, Malawi, Mali, Mauritania, Morocco, Namibia, Niger, Nigeria, Rwanda, Senegal, Sierra Leone, Somalia, South Africa, South Sudan, Sudan, Tanzania, Togo, Tunisia, Uganda, Zambia, and Zimbabwe; Andrieu et al. [87]—Burkina Faso, Colombia, and France; Dasgupta and Robinson [57]—Armenia, Cambodia, Chad, Djibouti, Ethiopia, Kenya, Malawi, Mali, Nigeria, South Africa, and Uganda; de Boef et al. [96]—Ethiopia, Myanmar, Nigeria, and Uganda; Gligorić et al. [60]—Australia, Brazil, Canada, Denmark, Egypt, France, Germany, Italy, Indonesia, India, Japan, Kenya, Mexico, Nigeria, Sweden, Spain, United Kingdom, and the United States; Kasim et al. [110]—Guyana and Nigeria; Wrabel et al. [78]—Bangladesh, DRC, Ethiopia, India, Jordan, Kenya, Malawi, Myanmar, Nepal, Nigeria, Pakistan, Philippines, Somalia, South Sudan, Tanzania, Uganda and Yemen; Egger et al. [100]—Bangladesh, Burkina Faso, Colombia, Ghana, Kenya, Nepal, Philippines, Rwanda and Sierra Leone; Mertens and Peñalvo [113], e.g., Angola, Burkina Faso, Chad, Liberia, Mali, Niger, Sudan, and Tanzania, Yemen, and Guyana
* Includes articles addressing at least two Western African countries. ** Includes articles dealing with at least another sub-African country outside West Africa. *** Includes articles covering at least a country outside sub-Saharan Africa.
Table 8. Agriculture subsectors.
Table 8. Agriculture subsectors.
Agriculture SubsectorExamples of Articles
Crop productionAgyei et al. [85]; Andrieu et al. [87]; Arouna et al. [128]; de Boef et al. [96]; Houessou et al. [105]; Jha et al. [108]; Martey et al. [64]; Middendorf et al. [114]; Middendorf et al. [65]; Nchanji and Lutomia [115]; Odebunmi et al. [67]; Omeje et al. [68]; Van Hoyweghen et al. [123]; Yegbemey et al. [126]
Animal productionBamidele et al. [91]; Bamidele et al. [49]; Middendorf et al. [114]; Vall et al. [122]
Fisheries/aquacultureOkyere et al. [131]; Ragasa et al. [74]
Table 9. Food chain stages.
Table 9. Food chain stages.
Food Chain Stage *Articles
ProductionAgyei-Holmes et al. [47]; Andrieu et al. [87]; Arouna et al. [128]; Bamidele et al. [49]; Chiemela et al. [92]; de Boef et al. [96]; Dugué et al. [98]; Houessou et al. [105]; Ilesanmi et al. [106]; Jha et al. [108]; Jha et al. [50]; Kinda et al. [34]; Kuuwill et al. [62]; Martey et al. [64]; Middendorf et al. [114]; Middendorf et al. [65]; Nchanji and Lutomia [115]; Obayelu et al. [117]; Okyere et al. [131]; Omeje et al. [68]; Ragasa et al. [74]; Ukaro Ofuoku et al. [121]; Vall et al. [122]; Van Hoyweghen et al. [123]; Yegbemey et al. [126]
Processing Vall et al. [122]; Yegbemey et al. [126]
Marketing and distribution/retail Adewopo et al. [82]; Aggarwal et al. [52]; Agyei et al. [85]; Asante-Poku and van Huellen [88]; Coulibaly [93]; Iheme et al. [61]; Ilesanmi et al. [106]; Middendorf et al. [65]; Ogunji et al. [118]; Vall et al. [122]; Van Hoyweghen et al. [123]; Yaw Codjoe et al. [125]
Consumption (including food waste)Abay et al. [79]; Aberese-Ako et al. [51]; Adebayo and Oluwamayowa [80]; Adenubi et al. [81]; Adewopo et al. [82]; Adjognon et al. [83]; Afriyie et al. [127]; Agbawodikeizu et al. [84]; Aggarwal et al. [52]; Agyei et al. [85]; Amare et al. [86]; Amoako et al. [53]; Arouna et al. [128]; Asante et al. [54]; Ayande and Chilufya [89]; Baada et al. [90]; Balana et al. [48]; Bamiwuye et al. [55]; Bukari et al. [56]; Buonsenso et al. [129]; Coulibaly [93]; Dasgupta and Robinson [94]; Dasgupta and Robinson [57]; Davis et al. [95]; Dear et al. [97]; Eboreime et al. [99]; Egger et al. [100]; Ekoh et al. [101]; Folayan et al. [102]; Folayan et al. [58]; Folorunso et al. [59]; Gligorić et al. [60]; Gummerson et al. [103]; Hemler et al. [104]; Houessou et al. [105]; Igwe et al. [130]; Iheme et al. [61]; Inegbedion [107]; Josephson et al. [109]; Kasim et al. [110]; Kinda et al. [34]; Lamontagne et al. [63]; Liverpool-Tasie et al. [111]; Madzorera et al. [112]; Mertens and Peñalvo [113]; Mueller et al. [66]; Nkrumah et al. [116]; Obayelu et al. [117]; Odebunmi et al. [67]; Ogunji et al. [118]; Okonkwo et al. [119]; Omidiji et al. [69]; Omotayo et al. [70]; Onyenweaku et al. [71]; Onyenweaku et al. [72]; Ouoba and Sawadogo [73]; Rudin-Rush et al. [75]; Saah et al. [120]; Tchuenchieu Kamgain et al. [76]; Traoré et al. [77]; Vall et al. [122]; Wang et al. [124]; Wrabel et al. [78]; Yaw Codjoe et al. [125]; Zidouemba et al. [132]
* Several articles address different stages of the food chain.
Table 10. Impacts of the pandemic on food security in West Africa.
Table 10. Impacts of the pandemic on food security in West Africa.
Food Security Dimension *Topics AddressedDocuments
Food availabilityDomestic food production and productivity Agyei et al. [85]; Agyei-Holmes et al. [47]; Andrieu et al. [87]; Arouna et al. [128]; Bamidele and Amole [91]; Bamidele et al. [49]; Chiemela et al. [92]; de Boef et al. [96]; Dugué et al. [98]; Houessou et al. [105]; Inegbedion [107]; Jha et al. [108]; Jha et al. [50]; Kuuwill et al. [62]; Martey et al. [64]; Middendorf et al. [114]; Nchanji and Lutomia [115]; Obayelu et al. [117]; Omeje et al. [68]; Omotayo et al. [70]; Ragasa et al. [74]; Ukaro Ofuoku et al. [121]; Vall et al. [122]; Van Hoyweghen et al. [123]; Yegbemey et al. [126]; Zidouemba et al. [132]
Food chains and marketsAdewopo et al. [82]; Aggarwal et al. [52]; Arouna et al. [128]; Asante-Poku and van Huellen [88]; Ayande and Chilufya [89]; Dasgupta and Robinson [57]; de Boef et al. [96]; Dugué et al. [98]; Liverpool-Tasie et al. [111]; Martey et al. [64]; Okonkwo et al. [119]; Okyere et al. [131]; Vall et al. [122]; Van Hoyweghen et al. [123]
Agri-food products losses Middendorf et al. [65]; Ilesanmi et al. [106]
Food accessEconomic access and affordability Aberese-Ako et al. [51]; Adebayo and Oluwamayowa [80]; Adewopo et al. [82]; Afriyie et al. [127]; Agbawodikeizu et al. [84]; Aggarwal et al. [52]; Agyei et al. [85]; Amare et al. [86]; Amoako et al. [53]; Asante et al. [54]; Asante-Poku and van Huellen [88]; Ayande and Chilufya [89]; Balana et al. [48]; Bamidele and Amole [91]; Bamiwuye et al. [55]; Bukari et al. [56]; Buonsenso et al. [129]; Coulibaly [93]; Dasgupta and Robinson [94]; Dasgupta and Robinson [57]; Davis et al. [95]; Egger et al. [100]; Folayan et al. [102]; Folayan et al. [58]; Gummerson et al. [103]; Igwe et al. [130]; Iheme et al. [61]; Josephson et al. [109]; Kinda et al. [34]; Kuuwill et al. [62]; Lamontagne et al. [63]; Madzorera et al. [112]; Middendorf et al. [114]; Middendorf et al. [65]; Mueller et al. [66]; Nkrumah et al. [116]; Obayelu et al. [117]; Ogunji et al. [118]; Okonkwo et al. [119]; Omidiji et al. [69]; Omotayo et al. [70]; Onyenweaku et al. [71]; Ouoba and Sawadogo [73]; Rudin-Rush et al. [75]; Vall et al. [122]; Yegbemey et al. [126]; Zidouemba et al. [132]
Physical accessAbay et al. [79]; Aberese-Ako et al. [51]; Adebayo and Oluwamayowa [80]; Adenubi et al. [81]; Adewopo et al. [82]; Adjognon et al. [83]; Afriyie et al. [127]; Agbawodikeizu et al. [84]; Aggarwal et al. [52]; Agyei et al. [85]; Amare et al. [86]; Asante et al. [54]; Asante-Poku and van Huellen [88]; Ayande and Chilufya [89]; Baada et al. [90]; Balana et al. [48]; Bamidele and Amole [91]; Bukari et al. [56]; Buonsenso et al. [129]; Chiemela et al. [92]; Dasgupta and Robinson [94]; Dasgupta and Robinson [57]; Davis et al. [95]; Dear et al. [97]; Dugué et al. [98]; Egger et al. [100]; Ekoh et al. [101]; Folayan et al. [102]; Folayan et al. [58]; Gummerson et al. [103]; Hemler et al. [104]; Houessou et al. [105]; Igwe et al. [130]; Ilesanmi et al. [106]; Inegbedion [107]; Josephson et al. [109]; Kinda et al. [34]; Lamontagne et al. [63]; Madzorera et al. [112]; Middendorf et al. [114]; Mueller et al. [66]; Nchanji and Lutomia [115]; Obayelu et al. [117]; Okonkwo et al. [119]; Okyere et al. [131]; Omidiji et al. [69]; Omotayo et al. [70]; Onyenweaku et al. [71]; Ouoba and Sawadogo [73]; Rudin-Rush et al. [75]; Saah et al. [120]; Traoré et al. [77]; Ukaro Ofuoku et al. [121]; Vall et al. [122]; Van Hoyweghen et al. [123]; Wang et al. [124]; Wrabel et al. [78]; Yaw Codjoe et al. [125]; Zidouemba et al. [132]
Food utilisationDiet quality and dietary diversityAbay et al. [79]; Afriyie et al. [127]; Amoako et al. [53]; Balana et al. [48]; Davis et al. [95]; Folorunso et al. [59]; Gligorić et al. [60]; Madzorera et al. [112]; Obayelu et al. [117]; Odebunmi et al. [67]; Onyenweaku et al. [71]; Onyenweaku et al. [72]; Saah et al. [120]
Food safety Adenubi et al. [81]; Eboreime et al. [99]; Kasim et al. [110]; Mertens and Peñalvo [113]; Odebunmi et al. [67]; Onyenweaku et al. [72]; Saah et al. [120]; Tchuenchieu Kamgain et al. [76]; Yaw Codjoe et al. [125]
Stability Food-related scenarios and projections Agyei et al. [85]; Coulibaly [93]; Jha et al. [108]; Kinda et al. [34]; Obayelu et al. [117]; Zidouemba et al. [132]
* Several articles address different food security dimensions.
Table 11. Sustainability of West African agri-food systems in the context of the pandemic.
Table 11. Sustainability of West African agri-food systems in the context of the pandemic.
Sustainability Dimension *DocumentsTopics Addressed
EnvironmentAndrieu et al. [87]; Kasim et al. [110]; Martey et al. [64] Climate change
Waste
EconomyAberese-Ako et al. [51]; Adewopo et al. [82]; Afriyie et al. [127]; Agbawodikeizu et al. [84]; Aggarwal et al. [52]; Agyei et al. [85]; Asante et al. [54]; Asante-Poku and van Huellen [88]; Baada et al. [90]; Bamidele and Amole [91]; Bamidele et al. [49]; Bamiwuye et al. [55]; Bukari et al. [56]; Buonsenso et al. [129]; Chiemela et al. [92]; Coulibaly [93]; Dasgupta and Robinson [57]; Davis et al. [95]; de Boef et al. [96]; Dugué et al. [98]; Egger et al. [100]; Ekoh et al. [101]; Folayan et al. [102]; Gummerson et al. [103]; Houessou et al. [105]; Iheme et al. [61]; Jha et al. [108]; Josephson et al. [109]; Kinda et al. [34]; Lamontagne et al. [63]; Madzorera et al. [112]; Martey et al. [64]; Middendorf et al. [114]; Middendorf et al. [65]; Mueller et al. [66]; Nkrumah et al. [116]; Obayelu et al. [117]; Ogunji et al. [118]; Omeje et al. [68]; Omidiji et al. [69]; Omotayo et al. [70]; Ouoba and Sawadogo [73]; Ragasa et al. [74]; Vall et al. [122]Competitiveness
Employment
Income
Jobs
Market/marketing
Poverty
Prices of inputs and agri-food products
Profitability
Society and cultureAbay et al. [79]; Aberese-Ako et al. [51]; Adebayo and Oluwamayowa [80]; Adenubi et al. [81]; Adewopo et al. [82]; Adjognon et al. [83]; Afriyie et al. [127]; Agbawodikeizu et al. [84]; Aggarwal et al. [52]; Agyei-Holmes et al. [47]; Amoako et al. [53]; Arouna et al. [128]; Asante et al. [54]; Asante-Poku and van Huellen [88]; Ayande and Chilufya [89]; Baada et al. [90]; Balana et al. [48]; Bamidele and Amole [91]; Bamidele et al. [49]; Bamiwuye et al. [55]; Bukari et al. [56]; Buonsenso et al. [129]; Dasgupta and Robinson [94]; Dasgupta and Robinson [57]; Davis et al. [95]; Dear et al. [97]; Dugué et al. [98]; Eboreime et al. [99]; Egger et al. [100]; Ekoh et al. [101]; Folayan et al. [102]; Folayan et al. [58]; Folorunso et al. [59]; Gligorić et al. [60]; Gummerson et al. [103]; Hemler et al. [104]; Houessou et al. [105]; Igwe et al. [130]; Iheme et al. [61]; Ilesanmi et al. [106]; Inegbedion [107]; Jha et al. [108]; Jha et al. [50]; Josephson et al. [109]; Kasim et al. [110]; Kuuwill et al. [62]; Lamontagne et al. [63]; Liverpool-Tasie et al. [111]; Madzorera et al. [112]; Mertens and Peñalvo [113]; Middendorf et al. [114]; Middendorf et al. [65]; Mueller et al. [66]; Nchanji and Lutomia [115]; Nkrumah et al. [116]; Obayelu et al. [117]; Odebunmi et al. [67]; Okonkwo et al. [119]; Okyere et al. [131]; Omeje et al. [68]; Omidiji et al. [69]; Omotayo et al. [70]; Onyenweaku et al. [71]; Onyenweaku et al. [72]; Ouoba and Sawadogo [73]; Ragasa et al. [74]; Rudin-Rush et al. [75]; Saah et al. [120]; Tchuenchieu Kamgain et al. [76]; Traoré et al. [77]; Ukaro Ofuoku et al. [121]; Vall et al. [122]; Van Hoyweghen et al. [123]; Wang et al. [124]; Wrabel et al. [78]; Yaw Codjoe et al. [125]; Yegbemey et al. [126]; Zidouemba et al. [132]Conflict
Culture (e.g., indigenous or traditional knowledge)
Equity
Food (in)security
Food safety
Gender
Health
Labor quality
Lifestyle
Livelihoods
Resilience
Vulnerability
Policy and governanceAndrieu et al. [87]; Arouna et al. [128]; Baada et al. [90]; Coulibaly [93]; Dasgupta and Robinson [94]; Liverpool-Tasie et al. [111]; Nkrumah et al. [116]; Omotayo et al. [70]Coping and mitigation strategies
Policy measures
* Several articles address different sustainability dimensions.
Table 12. Some recommendations relating to agriculture and food in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Table 12. Some recommendations relating to agriculture and food in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic.
DomainsExamples of RecommendationsSources
Policy Effective policy responses to and interventions in COVID-19 or similar shocks should consider the socioeconomic conditions of households and take cognisance of the disparities between urban and rural areasBamiwuye et al. [55]
Traoré et al. [77]
Targeting safety nets and other social protection/support interventions temporally, spatially, and across social groups to improve their effectiveness amid shocksBalana et al. [48]
Policy intervention in rural areas should focus on fostering sustainable livelihoods to eradicate food insecurity and enable rural households to recover quickly and be able to sustain themselves against future shocks and crisesOmotayo et al. [70]
Vulnerable populations and low-income households should be targeted for the government’s packages and programs against COVID-19 Aberese-Ako et al. [51]
Institutionalisation of social protection systems and provision of loans and grants to overcome financial difficulties during the COVID-19 pandemicMadzorera et al. [112]
Ilesanmi et al. [106]
Governments should set up ad hoc units to develop physical and digital plans for implementation during lockdowns or other emergenciesOgunji et al. [118]
Emergency agencies should have offices in rural areas to be closer to farmers and rural populations in times of crisesOmeje et al. [68]
Policy
Practice
Prioritising investments in local economies and job creation and building households’ assets and wealth base (e.g., land tenure security) to enhance resilience to shocksBalana et al. [48]
Governments should invest in market-oriented strategies such as postharvest handling, processing, storage, and marketing to ensure sufficient food supply during crisesYegbemey et al. [126]
Investing in infrastructure and providing adequate support to agri-food industries to improve efficiencies in the food supply chain and food availability and accessibility during pandemicsAgyei et al. [85]
Building sustainable and resilient local food systems through strengthening public–private partnerships and investing in short food supply chains and input supply systems Nchanji and Lutomia [115]
Designing and implementing alternative social protection policies and programs to substitute nutritional services (e.g., school feeding programs) affected by the pandemicAbay et al. [79]
Communities should be helped to keep the coping strategies and measures adopted during the COVID-19 pandemic even afterwardsAberese-Ako et al. [51]
Policy
Practice
Public extension services should be strengthened to help farmers adapt better to crises and shocksYegbemey et al. [126]
PolicyProviding social protection measures and programs that address basic human needs (e.g., food, shelter, and clothing) and specifically target food insecurityDavis et al. [95]
PracticePromoting campaigns and programmes to improve the awareness of dietary measures for the prevention of COVID-19 Madzorera et al. [112]
Onyenweaku et al. [72]
Promoting waste sorting at the household level and training the personnel dealing with waste management with particular attention to the adherence to COVID-19 protocol to prevent the spread of the virusKasim et al. [110]
Addressing the inappropriate knowledge of COVID-19 and its impacts on nutrition and education among the young and adolescents Wang et al. [124]
Research Evaluating the health and nutritional benefits and antiviral and immunomodulatory properties of medicinal plants and special foods to select foods to prioritise in the fight against COVID-19Odebunmi et al. [67]
Onyenweaku et al. [72]
Performing in-depth comparative studies to understand the pandemic’s differentiated impact on various groups within societies, differences in the efficacy of safety nets, and why some countries have coped better with the pandemic than others haveDasgupta and Robinson [57]
Using a farming systems approach to assess the COVID-19 impacts to ensure an in-depth examination of agronomic, social (e.g., livelihoods and well-being), and environmental/biophysical issues at community and household levelsMiddendorf et al. [114]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

El Bilali, H.; Dambo, L.; Nanema, J.; Tietiambou, S.R.F.; Dan Guimbo, I.; Nanema, R.K. Impacts of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Agri-Food Systems in West Africa. Sustainability 2023, 15, 10643. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151310643

AMA Style

El Bilali H, Dambo L, Nanema J, Tietiambou SRF, Dan Guimbo I, Nanema RK. Impacts of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Agri-Food Systems in West Africa. Sustainability. 2023; 15(13):10643. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151310643

Chicago/Turabian Style

El Bilali, Hamid, Lawali Dambo, Jacques Nanema, Sheirita Reine Fanta Tietiambou, Iro Dan Guimbo, and Romaric Kiswendsida Nanema. 2023. "Impacts of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Agri-Food Systems in West Africa" Sustainability 15, no. 13: 10643. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151310643

APA Style

El Bilali, H., Dambo, L., Nanema, J., Tietiambou, S. R. F., Dan Guimbo, I., & Nanema, R. K. (2023). Impacts of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Agri-Food Systems in West Africa. Sustainability, 15(13), 10643. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151310643

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop