The Vega Alta of Segura River (Southeast of Spain): A Wetland of International Importance
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Study Area
2.2. Methodology
Sites Comprising Representative, Rare, or Unique Wetland Types |
Criterion 1: A wetland may be considered of international importance if it contains a representative, rare or unique example of a natural or near-natural wetland type in a biogeographic region. |
Criteria based on species and ecological communities |
Criterion 2: A wetland may be considered of international importance if it supports vulnerable, endangered or critically endangered species, or threatened ecological communities. |
Criterion 3: A wetland may be considered of international importance if it supports populations of plant and/or animal species important to maintain the diversity of a biogeographic region. |
Criterion 4: A wetland may be considered of international importance if it supports plant and/or animal species when they are in a critical stage of their biological cycle. |
Specific criteria based on waterfowl |
Criterion 5: A wetland may be considered of international importance if it regularly supports a population of 20,000 or more waterfowl birds. |
Criterion 6: A wetland may be considered of international importance if it regularly supports 1% of the individuals in a population of a species or subspecies of waterfowl. |
Specific criteria based on fish |
Criterion 7: A wetland may be considered of international importance if it supports a significant proportion of indigenous fish subspecies, species or families, life cycle stages, species and/or population interactions that are representative of the benefits and/or values of wetlands, and in this way it contributes to the world’s biological diversity. |
Criterion 8: A wetland may be considered of international importance if it is an important food source for fish, is a spawning area, an area of development and growth, and/or a migration route on which fish stocks within or outside the wetland depend. |
Specific criteria based on other taxonomic groups |
Criterion 9: A wetland may be considered of international importance if it regularly supports 1% of the individuals in the population of a subspecies or species that is a non-aviary animal. |
Additionalcriteria |
Cultural value: A wetland can also be considered of international importance when, in addition to ecological criteria, it has examples that illustrate important cultural value, whether material or not, related to its origin, conservation, and/or ecological functioning. |
2.3. Field Work
3. Results
Zone | Area (ha) | Type of Wetland | Ramsar Code |
---|---|---|---|
Natural Wetlands | |||
Segura, Mundo, Moratalla, Argos, Quípar and rambla del CárcaboRivers | - | Natural stretches of permanent waterways (includes riverbanks) | M |
“Sotos and Bosques de Ribera de Cañaverosa” Nature Reserve | 56.7 | Natural stretches of permanent waterways (includes riverbanks) | M |
“Cañón deAlmadenes” Nature Reserve | 40.1 | Natural stretches of permanent waterways (includes riverbanks) | M |
Artificial or modified wetlands with ecological interest | |||
La RiscaReservoir | 15.3 | Reservoirs of ecological interest and that function as wetlands | 6 |
Argos Reservoir | 126.6 | ||
MoratallaReservoir | 1.3 | ||
CárcaboReservoir | 16.0 | ||
QuíparReservoir | 423.6 | ||
Salinas de la Ramona | 2.1 | Salt flats | 5 |
Rice fields of Calasparra, Salmerón, and Mundo | 875 | Flooded land of ecological interest | 5 |
- i.
- Criterion 2: in the Vega Alta of the Segura River, 11 threatened species have been found in Spain, to which we must add two species of fish included in Annex II of the Habitat Directive of the European Union (Table 3). Among them, it is worth highlighting the populations of chub (Squaliuspyrenaicus), a species of fish that is considered in danger of extinction in the Segura Riverbasin, since it has a distribution that is restricted to the upper part of the River Mundo and some enclaves isolated from other tributaries of the Segura River [29]. It is alsonoteworthy that populations of bigeye buzzard (Myotiscapaccinii) are in danger of extinction and are distributed in the Region of Murcia, mainly around the courses and bodies of water of the Vega or the Segura River [30,33].
CommonName | Scientific Name | Red Books of Spain | Spanish Catalogue of Species in Danger of Extinction (RD131/2011) | Habitat Directive (92/43/CEE) | Birds Directive (2009/147/CE) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Fishes | |||||
Chub | Squaliuspyrenaicus | A.II | |||
Iberiannase | Chondrostomapolylepis | A.II | |||
Mammals | |||||
Cave bats | Myniopterusschereibersii | VU | A.II | ||
Long-fingeredbat | Myotiscapaccinii | EPE | A.II | ||
Lesser mouse-earedbat | Myotisblythii | VU | A.II | ||
Greater mouse-earedbat | Myotismyotis | VU | A.II | ||
Birds | |||||
Squacco Heron | Ardeolaralloides | VU | A.I | ||
Western marshharrier | Circusaeroginosus | VU | VU | A.I | |
Montagu’sharrier | Circuspygargus | VU | VU | A.I | |
Western osprey | Pandionhaliaetus | EPCr | VU | A.I | |
Eurasian teal | Anas crecca | VU | |||
Commonreedbunting | Emberizaschoeniclus | VU | A.I | ||
Amphibians | |||||
Beticmidwifetoad | Alytesdickhilleni | VU | VU |
Species | Iberian Endemism | Regional Vulnerability |
---|---|---|
Agabusramblae | X | |
Hydrochusnooreinus | X | High |
Helophorusbrevipalpis | High | |
Newbrioporusbaeticus | X | |
Ochthebiusdelgadoi | X | |
Stictonectesepipleuricus | X |
Code | Habitat |
---|---|
7210* | Calcareous bogs of Cladiummariscus and with Caricondavallanae species |
7220* | Petrifying springs with tuff formation (Cratoneurion) |
- ii.
- Criterion 3: in the Vega Alta of the Segura River, in addition to the two habitats included in criterion 2, nine habitats associated with humid environments of Annex I of the Habitats Directive of the European Union were described with Global Assessment A [24,33]. They are as follows:
- (a)
- Habitat 1410. Mediterranean saline grasslands (Juntaliamaritimi) occupies 1.10 hectares and is distributed in narrow strips around the Segura riverbed and in brackish areas around the Cárcabo reservoir.
- (b)
- Habitat 3150. Natural eutrophic lakes and lagoons, with Magnopotamion or Hydrocharition vegetation (underwater grasslands), andan area of 20.18 hectares.
- (c)
- Habitat 3250. Mediterranean rivers of permanent flow with Glauciumflavum, with an extension of 2.35 hectares.
- (d)
- Habitat 3280. Mediterranean rivers of permanent flow of the Paspalo-Agrostidion with riparian plant curtains of Salix and Populusalba, which occupy a total of 2.26 hectares, and which colonize surfaces with frequent floods along the banks of rivers, streams, and irrigation canals.
- (e)
- Habitat 3290. Mediterranean rivers of intermittent flow of the Paspalo-Agrostidion. These are reed beds that develop in non-permanent waters.
- (f)
- Habitat 6420. Mediterranean hygrophilous herbaceous communities (reed beds), with an area of 60.88 hectares.
- (g)
- Habitat 6430. Hygrophilous eutrophic megaphorbs of the plain fringes and mountainous to alpine steeps, with a total area of 23.54 hectares.
- (h)
- Habitat 92AO. Gallery forests of Salix alba and Populus alba (poplars and willows), which develop in the upper and middle sections of the Segura river basin, with a layout in two parallel bands located on both sides of the riverbed, together occupying an expanse of 84.49 hectares. These formations are usually accompanied by elms, ash trees, willows, and Magnoliopsida, in addition to other shrub species, such as oleanders.
- (i)
- Habitat 92DO. Thermo-Mediterranean riparian thickets and galleries (Nerio-Tamaricetea and Securinegiontinctoriae) (Magnoliopsida and oleanders), with a vegetation formed mainly by poplars, tars, Magnoliopsida, and oleanders, which are distributed along the riverbeds and occupy an area of 128.5 hectares.
- iii.
- Cultural values: associated with the river terraces of the Segura River and the Mundo River are rice fields, which have been cultivated in a traditional way since the 18th century. It is a type of humid area of an artificial nature, both due to its origin and its use, which is characterized by the significant returns from irrigation that periodically and naturally recharge the underlying aquifer. They constitute shallow aquatic ecosystems (15–20 cm), which have a dry phase during winter and another wet phase that lasts from April or May to November or December [33]. Rice cultivation occupied a potential area of 2463 hectares at the beginning of the 20th century, which was made official and protected by the Royal Decree of February 1, 1908, the date on which the delimitation of the CotoArrocero (Rice farms) located in the municipal terms of Hellín (Castilla-La Mancha), Moratalla, and Calasparra (Region of Murcia), with the latter municipality having a larger area (approximately 1000 hectares), roots, and tradition (Sánchez-Lorente, 1999). In 1986, the Protected Designation of Origin (PDO) was approved for the Bomba varieties (cultivated since the 19th century) and BalillaXSollana (hybrid variety obtained in 1948). This certificate guarantees the quality of the product and its origin, so that Calasparra rice became the first to have this endorsement in the world, with a Regulatory Council that must ensure compliance with the regulations during the process and methods cultivation that ensure its quality. There are two main factors that influence the origin, uniqueness, and quality of the product [48,49], and that make it of cultural value closely interrelated with the natural values of the environment.
- (a)
- The rice fields are located in small valleys, with slopes that make mechanization difficult, located at an average altitude of 450 m above sea level, in a fertile valley surrounded by mountains and fed by the clean moving waters of the Segura River, with a system of ditches and floodgates that take the water from the river and that generate a renewing current, flooding the rice field. This is met with a structure supported at different levels and plots separated by small boundaries. The excess water after irrigation returns to the main river.
- (b)
- Use of traditional cultivation methods that, in part, are maintained over time: adaptation of the land, sowing, weeding, and harvesting of the produce. The sowing is done with seeds that have been previously hydrated, to prevent them from floating and can be spread over the flooded boxes, which have been previously conditioned and nourished. The cultivated varieties (Bomba and BalillaXSollana) are adapted to the special characteristics of this environment.
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Vélez, F. ImpactosSobre Zonas Húmedas Naturales; Instituto Nacional para la Conservación de la Naturaleza (Ministerio de Agricultura); Servicio de Publicacionesagrarias: Madrid, Spain, 1979. [Google Scholar]
- Ramsar. The Convention on Wetlands and Its Mission. Gland. Ramsar Convention on Wetlands. Available online: https://ramsar.org/about/the-convention-on-wetlands-and-its-mission (accessed on 28 November 2020).
- Dugan, P. Wetlands in Danger. A World Conservation Atlas; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 1993. [Google Scholar]
- O´Connel, M.J. Detecting, measuring and reversing changes to wetlands. Wetl. Ecol. Manag. 2003, 11, 197–401. [Google Scholar]
- Engle, V.D. Estimating the Provision of Ecosystem Services by Gulf of Mexico Coastal Wetlands. Wetlands 2011, 31, 179–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Maltby, E.; Acreman, M.C. Ecosystem services of wetlands: Pathfinder for a new paradigm. Hydrol. Sci. J. 2011, 56, 1341–1359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ramsar. Wetlands of International Importance. Gland. Ramsar Convention on Wetlands. Available online: https://www.ramsar.org/sites-countries/wetlands-of-international-importance (accessed on 7 December 2020).
- Convention on Wetlands. A New Toolkit for National Wetlands Inventories. Gland, Switzerland: Convention on Wetlands Se-Cretariat. Available online: https://www.ramsar.org/sites/default/files/documents/library/nwi_toolkit_2020_e.pdf (accessed on 10 December 2020).
- Davidson, N.C. How much wetland has the world lost? Long-term and recent trends in global wetland area. Mar. Freshw. Res. 2014, 65, 934–941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Darrah, S.E.; Shennan-Farpón, Y.; Loh, J.; Davidson, N.C.; Finlayson, C.M.; Gardner, R.C.; Walpole, M.J. Improvements to the Wetland Extent Trends (WET) index as a tool for monitoring natural and human-made wetlands. Ecol. Indic. 2019, 99, 294–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ramsar. Global Wetland Outlook: State of the World’s Wetlands and Their Services to People. Gland: Ramsar Convention Se-Cretariat. Available online: https://www.ramsar.org/sites/default/files/flipbooks/ramsar_gwo_english_web.pdf (accessed on 10 December 2020).
- Finlayson, C.M.; Milton, G.R.; Prentice, R.C.; Davidson, N.C. (Eds.) The Wetland Book-II; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2016; Available online: https://link.springer.com/referenceworkentry/10.1007%2F978-94-007-6173-5_186-1 (accessed on 10 December 2020).
- Bennett, E.M.; Cramer, W.; Begossi, A.; Cundill, G.; Díaz, S.; Egoh, B.N.; Geijzendorffer, I.R.; Krug, C.B.; Lavorel, S.; Lazos, E.; et al. Linking biodiversity, ecosystem services, and human well-being: Three challenges for designing research for sustainability. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 2015, 14, 76–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mauerhofer, V.; Kim, R.E.; Stevens, C. When implementation works: A comparison of Ramsar convention implementatiton in different continents. Environ. Sci. Policy 2015, 51, 95–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Worboys, G.L.; Lockwood, M.; Kothari, A.; Feary, S.; Pulsford, I. Protected Area Governance and Management; Anu Press: Canberra, Australia, 2015; Available online: https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/j.ctt1657v5d.13.pdf (accessed on 10 December 2020).
- Gell, P.A.; Finlayson, C.M.; Davidson, N.C. Understanding Change in the Ecological Character of Ramsar Wetlands: Pers-Pectives from a Deeper Time—Synthesis. Mar. Freshw. Res. 2016, 67, 869. Available online: https://www.publish.csiro.au/MF/mf16075 (accessed on 7 December 2020). [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Ramsar. Designating Ramsar Sites: Strategic Framework and Guidelines for the Future Development of the List of Wetlands of Inter-National Importance, Ramsar Handbooks for the Wise Use of Wetlands, 4th ed.; Ramsar Convention Secretariat: Gland, Switzerland; Available online: https://www.ramsar.org/sites/default/files/documents/pdf/lib/hbk4-17.pdf (accessed on 10 December 2020).
- Tittensor, D.P.; Walpole, M.; Hill, S.L.L.; Boyce, D.G.; Britten, G.L.; Burgess, N.D.; Butchart, S.H.M.; Leadley, P.W.; Regan, E.C.; Alkemade, R.; et al. A mid-term analysis of progress toward international biodiversity targets. Science 2014, 346, 241–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Asaad, I.; Lundquist, C.J.; Erdmann, M.V.; Costello, M.J. Ecological criteria to identify areas for biodiversity conservation. Biol. Conserv. 2017, 213, 309–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- BOE (Official Gazette of the State of Spain). No. 199, of August 20, 1982, Pages 22472 to Instrument of March 18, 1982 of Accession by Spain to the Convention on Wetlands of International Importance, Especially as Habitat for Waterfowl, Made in Ramsar on February 2, 1971. Available online: https://www.boe.es/buscar/doc.php?id=BOE-A-1982-21179 (accessed on 21 January 2021).
- Dirección General de Biodiversidad. Plan Estratégico Español Para la Conservación y Uso Racional de los Humedales. Madrid, Ministerio para la Transición Ecológica y el Reto Demográfico. Available online: https://www.miteco.gob.es/es/biodiversidad/temas/ecosistemas-y-conectividad/conservacion-de-humedales/ch_estratg_plan_estrategico_curh.aspx (accessed on 7 December 2020).
- BORM (Official Gazette of the Region of Murcia). Decree No. 55/2015, of April 17, on the Declaration of Special Conservation Zones and Approval of the Comprehensive Management Plan of the Natura 2000 Network Protected Areas of the Northwest Region of Murcia. Available online: http://www.murcianatural.carm.es/web/guest/visor-novedades/-/asset_publisher/xK0B/content/3492119;jsessionid=B8D7B5128FF5FCDACA86AA076ADD0E43?artId=3492119 (accessed on 28 November 2020).
- BOE.Núm. 139, de 11 de junio de 2019, páginas 61138 a Resolution of May 21, 2019, of the General Directorate of Biodiversity and Environmental Quality, by Which 53 New Wetlands of the Autonomous Community of the Region of Murcia Are Included in the Spanish Inventory of Wetlands. Available online: https://www.boe.es/diario_boe/txt.php?id=BOE-A-2019-8692 (accessed on 10 December 2020).
- Alcaráz, F.; Barreña, J.A.; Clemente, C.M.; González, J.L.; Ribera, D.; Ríos, S. Manual de interpretación de los Hábitats naturales y seminaturales de la Región de Murcia. TomoConsejería de Agricultura, Agua y Medio Ambiente de la Región de Murcia; Ayuntamiento de Murcia: Murcia, Spain, 2008. [Google Scholar]
- Ballesteros, G.A.; Ruzafa, A. Contrastes naturales en la regiónbioclimática del mediterráneo. Museo de la Ciencia y el Agua del Ayuntamiento de Murcia; Ayuntamiento de Murcia: Murcia, Spain, 2006. [Google Scholar]
- Calvo, J.F.; Esteve, M.A.; López, F. Biodiversidad: Contribución a suConocimiento y Conservaciónen la Región de Murcia; Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Murcia: Murcia, Spain, 2000. [Google Scholar]
- Conesa, C. El Medio Físico de la Región de Murcia; Universidad de Murcia: Murcia, Spain, 2006. [Google Scholar]
- Díez de Revenga, E.; Ballesteros, G.A.; Castillo, V.; Falcó, M.D.; García, J.A.; González, G.; Giménez, M.; Gómez, R.; Picazo, H.; Rodier, A.; et al. Estrategia Regional para la Conservación y el UsoSostenible de la Diversidad Bio-lógica. Consejería de Agricultura, Agua y Medio Ambiente de la Región de Murcia. Available online: http://www.murcianatural.carm.es/web/guest/estrategias/-/journal_content/56_INSTANCE_9GoI/14/84596 (accessed on 21 December 2020).
- Oliva, F.J.; Zamora, J.M.; Franco, J.M.; Zamora, A.; Sánchez, A.; Amat, A.; Guillén, A.; Guerrero, A.; Torralva, M. Pecesdulceacuícolas de la cuenca del río Segura. Murcia: Asociación de Naturalistas del Sureste. Available online: https://www.asociacionanse.org/descarga-guia-peces-y-atlas-odonatos/20190131/ (accessed on 28 November 2020).
- Robledano, F.; Calvo, J.F.; Hernández, V. Libro Rojo de los Vertebrados de la Región de Murcia; ComunidadAutónoma de la Región de Murcia: Murcia, Spain, 2006. [Google Scholar]
- Sánchez-Fernández, D.; Abellán, P.; Velasco, J.; Millán, A. Áreasprioritarias de conservaciónen la cuenca del río Segura utilizando los coleópterosacuáticoscomoindicadores. Limnetica 2004, 23, 209–228. [Google Scholar]
- Ribas-Martínez, S.; Asensi, A.; Costa, M.; Fernández-González, F.; Llorens, L.; Masalles, R.; Molero Mesa, J.; Penas, A.; Pérez de Paz, P.I. El Proyecto de Cartografía e Inventariación de los Tipos de hábitats de la Directiva 92/43/CEE enEspaña. Colloques Phytosociologiques XXII. Available online: http://www.jolube.es/pdf/Rivas-Mart_al_1993_Habitats_Espana_Coll_Phytos_22.pdf (accessed on 21 December 2020).
- General Directorate of the Environment (Dirección General de Medio Ambiente). Natura 2000-Standard Data form Sierras y Vega Alta del Segura y Ríos Alhárabe y Moratalla. ComunidadAutónoma de la Región de Murcia. Available online: http://www.murcianatural.carm.es/c/document_library/get_file?uuid=dbb98483-9f7b-48e4-bad9-bdc8936ca1dd&groupId=14 (accessed on 28 November 2020).
- Rodríguez, T.; López, F. InvestigaciónInterdisciplinarSobre las DeformacionesRecientesen el Sector Meridional de la Vega Alta del Segura (Murcia). CriteriosHidrogeológicosAplicables al Estudio de la Neotectónicaen el SuresteEspañol. Primeras Jornadas SobreNeotectónica y suAplicación al Análisis de Riesgos de EmplazamientoEnergíaIndustrias. Energía Nucl. 1984, 149, 259–266. [Google Scholar]
- Ballesteros, G.A.; Ruiz, V.; Espín, D.; Ibarra, D. El noroestemurciano, tierra de contrastes. In GeografíaAplicadaen la Región de Murcia. Guía de las Salidas de Campo; García, R., Alonso, F., Belmonte, F., Eds.; Asociación de GeógrafosEspañoles: Madrid, Spain, 2016; pp. 123–150. [Google Scholar]
- Comité de Humedales. Protocolo de Inclusión de Humedalesespañolesen la Lista de ImportanciaInternacional (Convenio de Ramsar) y Anexo Técnico; Ministerio de Medio Ambiente de España: Madrid, Spain, 2011. [Google Scholar]
- Yelo, D.; Calvo, J.F. Aproximación a la distribución y estatus de los mamíferoscarnívorosen la Región de Murcia. Galemys 2004, 16, 21–37. [Google Scholar]
- IUCN. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Available online: http://www.iucnredlist.org/ (accessed on 15 September 2008).
- Torralva, M.; Oliva, F.J.; Andreu, A.; Verdiell, D.; Miñano, P.A.; Egea, A. Atlas de distribución de los pecesepicontinentales de la Región de Murcia; Consejería de Industria y Medio Ambiente de la Región de Murcia: Murcia, Spain, 2005. [Google Scholar]
- Guardiola, A.; Fernández, M.P.; Olivares, E. Evaluación de las coloniasmurcianas de quirópterosincluidosen el Anexo II de la DirectivaHábitats. In Actas del III Congreso de la Naturaleza de la Región de Murcia (Octubre 2004); Asociación de Natu-ralistas del Sureste: Murcia, Spain, 2004; pp. 147–154. [Google Scholar]
- Kunz, T.H.; Thomas, D.; Richards, G.C.; Tidemann, C.R.; Pierson, E.D.; Racey, P.A. Observational Techniques for Batsw; de Wilson, D.E., Cole, F.R., Nicchols, J.D., Rudran, R., Foster, M.S., Eds.; Measuring and Monitoring Biological Diversity. Standard Methods for Mammals; Smihsonian Institution Press: Washington, DC, USA; London, UK, 1996; pp. 105–114. [Google Scholar]
- Barlow, K. Expedition Field Techiques. Bats; Expedition Advisory Centre-RGS: London, UK, 1999. [Google Scholar]
- Tellería, J.L. Objetivos y Métodos del Seguimiento de Poblaciones de Aves; Sánchez, E.A., Ed.; Actas de las XV Jornadas Orni-tológicasEspañolas, 25-SEO/BirdLife: Madrid, Spain, 2000. [Google Scholar]
- Atlas de distribución de los anfíbios de la Región de Murcia. Available online: http://www.murcianatural.carm.es/web/guest/visor-contenidos-dinamicos?artId=107483&groupId=14&version=1.0 (accessed on 21 September 2009).
- Directorate General for the Natural Environment (Dirección General de Medio Natural). Plan de Gestión Integral de los espaciosprotegidos de la Red Natura 2000 del Noroeste de la Región de Murcia; Consejería de Agricultura y Agua de la Región de Murcia: Murcia, Spain, 2015.
- Doadrio, I. Atlas y Libro Rojo de los pecescontinentales de España; Ministerio de Medio Ambiente de España: Madrid, Spain, 2001. [Google Scholar]
- Madroño, A.; González, C.; Atienza, J.C. Libro Rojo de las aves de España. Madrid: Ministerio de Medio Ambiente de España. Available online: https://www.seo.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/Libro_Rojo_Aves.pdf (accessed on 21 December 2020).
- Sánchez-Llorente, J.G. Historia del arroz enCalasparra. Archivo Municipal de Calasparra. Available online: http://www.arrozdecalasparra.com/historia.pdf (accessed on 28 November 2020).
- Bernal, J.A. ProtecciónagroambientalenCalasparra gracias al arroz. Desarro. Rural Sosten. 2014, 22, 26–27. [Google Scholar]
- Gil Meseguer, E. Paisajesculturales del regadíotradicional e históricoen la Vega Alta de Segura. Proc. Irrig. Soc. Landsc. Tribut. Thomas F. Glick 2014, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Espín, J.M.G. La construcción y ampliación de los regadíostradicionales e históricosen la Vega Alta de Segura: Sucesión de azudes y acequias, artilugioshidráulicosescalonados y motores de elevación de aguas. Proc. Irrig. Soc. Landsc. Tribut. Thomas F. Glick 2014, 402–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- López, M.; Andrés, M. Estudio de la capacidad de acogida y planificación de las áreasrecreativas de Calasparra (Mur-cia). Cuad. Tur. 2000, 6, 103–121. [Google Scholar]
- Scott, D.A.; Jones, T.A. Classification and inventory of wetlands: A global overview. Vegetatio 1995, 118, 3–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stroud, D.A. Selecting Ramsar Sites: The Development of the Criteria for the Designation of Wetlands of International Importan-ce—1971; Joint Nature Conservation Committee: Peterborough, UK, 2006.
- Mitchell, A.H. Wise use of wetlands, the Ramsar Convention on wetlands, and the need for an Asian Regional Wetlands Training Initiative. Aquat. Ecosyst. Health Manag. 2001, 4, 235–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zalidis, G.C.; Takavakoglou, V.; Panoras, A.; Bilas, G.; Katsavouni, S. Re-Establishing a Sustainable Wetland at Former Lake Karla, Greece, Using Ramsar Restoration Guidelines. Environ. Manag. 2004, 34, 875–886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Prahalad, V.N.; Kriwoken, L. Implementation of the Ramsar Convention on Wetlands in Tasmania, Australia. J. Int. Wildl. Law Policy 2010, 13, 205–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aminu, M.; Ludin, A.N.B.M.; Matori, A.-N.; Yusof, K.W.; Dano, L.U.; Chandio, I.A. A spatial decision support system (SDSS) for sustainable tourism planning in Johor Ramsar sites, Malaysia. Environ. Earth Sci. 2013, 70, 1113–1124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wittmann, F.; Householder, E.; Lopes, A.; Wittmann, A.D.O.; Junk, W.J.; Piedade, M.T. Implementation of the Ramsar Convention on South American wetlands: An update. Res. Rep. Biodivers. Stud. 2015, 4, 47–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Marín, V.H.; Delgado, L.E.; Tironi-Silva, A.; Finlayson, C.M. Exploring Social-Ecological Complexities of Wetlands of International Importance (Ramsar Sites): The Carlos Anwandter Sanctuary (Valdivia, Chile) as a Case Study. Wetlands 2017, 38, 1171–1182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nhuan, M.T.; Ngoc, N.T.M.; Huong, N.Q.; Hue, N.T.H.; Tue, N.T.; Ngoc, P.B. Assessment of Vietnam Coastal Wetland Vulnerability for Sustainable Use (Case Study in Xuanthuy Ramsar Site, Vietnam). J. Wetl. Ecol. 2009, 2, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cherkaoui, S.I.; Magri, N.; Hanane, S. Factors predicting Ramsar site occupancy by threatened waterfowl: The case of the Marbled Teal Marmaronettaangustirostris and Ferruginous Duck Aythya nyroca in Morocco. Ardeola 2016, 63, 295–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Acuña-Piedra, J.F.; Quesada-Román, A. Evolucióngeomorfológica entre 1948 y 2012 del delta Térraba—Sierpe, Costa Rica. Cuatern. Geomorfol. 2016, 30, 49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Quesada-Román, A.; Acuña-Piedra, J.F. Efectosclimáticos y antrópicosen la morfogénesis de islaGuarumal, Humedal Nacional Térraba-Sierpe, Costa Rica. Rev. Cienc. Ambient. 2017, 51, 169–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Acuña-Piedra, J.F.; Quesada-Román, A. Cambiosen el uso y cobertura de la tierra entre 1948 y 2012 en el Humedal Nacional Térraba-Sierpe, Costa Rica. Rev. Cienc. Mar. Costeras 2017, 9, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Acuña-Piedra, J.; Quesada-Román, A.; Vargas-Bolãnos, C. Coverage and Distribution of the Mangrove Species in the Térraba-Sierpe National Wetland, Costa Rica. Anuário Inst. Geociências 2018, 41, 120–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Veas-Ayala, N.; Quesada-Román, A.; Hidalgo, H.G.; Alfaro, E.J. Humedales del Parque Nacional Chirripó, Costa Rica: Características, relacionesgeomorfológicas y escenarios de cambioclimático. Rev. Biol. Trop. 2018, 66, 1436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Quesada-Román, A.; Mora-Vega, A. Impactosambientales y variabilidadclimáticaen el humedal de San Vito, Coto Brus, Costa Rica. Rev. Cienc. Ambient. 2017, 51, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Kandus, P.; Minotti, P.G.; Morandeira, N.S.; Grimson, R.; Trilla, G.G.; González, E.B.; Martín, L.S.; Gayol, M.P. Remote sensing of wetlands in South America: Status and challenges. Int. J. Remote. Sens. 2017, 39, 993–1016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Al-Obaid, S.; Samraoui, B.; Thomas, J.; El-Serehy, H.A.; Alfarhan, A.H.; Schneider, W.; O’Connell, M. An overview of wetlands of Saudi Arabia: Values, threats, and perspectives. Ambio 2016, 46, 98–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Bassi, N.; Kumar, M.D.; Sharma, A.; Pardha-Saradhi, P. Status of wetlands in India: A review of extent, ecosystem benefits, threats and management strategies. J. Hydrol. Reg. Stud. 2014, 2, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Meng, W.; He, M.; Hu, B.; Mo, X.; Li, H.; Liu, B.; Wang, Z. Status of wetlands in China: A review of extent, degradation, issues and recommendations for improvement. Ocean Coast. Manag. 2017, 146, 50–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hu, S.; Niu, Z.; Chen, Y.; Li, L.; Zhang, H. Global wetlands: Potential distribution, wetland loss, and status. Sci. Total. Environ. 2017, 586, 319–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Strassburg, B.B.N.; Iribarrem, A.; Beyer, H.L.; Cordeiro, C.L.; Crouzeilles, R.; Jakovac, C.C.; Junqueira, A.B.; Lacerda, E.; Latawiec, A.E.; Balmford, A.; et al. Global priority areas for ecosystem restoration. Nature 2020, 586, 724–729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zedler, J.B.; Kercher, S. WETLAND RESOURCES: Status, Trends, Ecosystem Services, and Restorability. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 2005, 30, 39–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Ballesteros-Pelegrín, G.; Ibarra-Marinas, D.; García-Marín, R. The Vega Alta of Segura River (Southeast of Spain): A Wetland of International Importance. Sustainability 2021, 13, 3145. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13063145
Ballesteros-Pelegrín G, Ibarra-Marinas D, García-Marín R. The Vega Alta of Segura River (Southeast of Spain): A Wetland of International Importance. Sustainability. 2021; 13(6):3145. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13063145
Chicago/Turabian StyleBallesteros-Pelegrín, Gustavo, Daniel Ibarra-Marinas, and Ramón García-Marín. 2021. "The Vega Alta of Segura River (Southeast of Spain): A Wetland of International Importance" Sustainability 13, no. 6: 3145. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13063145
APA StyleBallesteros-Pelegrín, G., Ibarra-Marinas, D., & García-Marín, R. (2021). The Vega Alta of Segura River (Southeast of Spain): A Wetland of International Importance. Sustainability, 13(6), 3145. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13063145