You are currently viewing a new version of our website. To view the old version click .
Sustainability
  • Comment
  • Open Access

20 December 2021

Comment on Alam et al. Numerical Simulation of Homogeneous–Heterogeneous Reactions through a Hybrid Nanofluid Flowing over a Rotating Disc for Solar Heating Applications. Sustainability 2021, 13, 8289

Mechanical Power Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Mansoura University, Mansoura 35516, Egypt
This article belongs to the Special Issue Thermal Performance Improvement of Solar Air Heater
Alam et al. [1] investigated hybrid nanofluid flow with heterogeneous-homogeneous reactions past a rotating disc. They presented the governing equation of temperature (Equation (5) in [1]) as:
[ u T r + W T z ] = [ k h n f ( ρ c p ) h n f + 16 σ * T 3 3 k * ( ρ c p ) h n f ] [ 2 T r 2 + 2 T z 2 + 1 r T r ]
From Equation (1), temperature (T) depends on r, z.
Alam et al. [1] used these transformations (Equation (9) in [1]):
η = Ω ν f z
θ ( η ) = T ( r , z ) T T w T
From Equation (2), η depends on z only.
From Equation (3), θ(η) depends on z only because η = Ω ν f z whereas RHS T ( r , z ) T T w T depends on r, z. Hence, Equation (3) is inappropriate.
Pantokratoras [2,3,4,5,6] indicated that the θ(η) expression is inappropriate. In [6], he presented the correct η form in Minkowycz and Sparrow [7] as:
η = [ g β ( T w T ) 4 ν 2 ] y x 1 / 4
From Equation (4), η depends on x, y only, which is in agreement with the governing equation of temperature in Minkowycz and Sparrow [7]:
u T x + v T y = α 2 T y 2
However, Alam et al. [1] expressed their governing equation of temperature (Equation (1) in these comments) as a function of both r, z.
In 2021, Awad [8] indicated that the θ(η) expression is inappropriate.
In their results, Alam et al. [1] presented graphically the various variables effects on the temperature and velocity.
However, many profiles in figures in this paper are truncated and wrong. Pantokratoras [9,10] discussed these common errors. Examples of these figures where profiles are truncated and wrong include:
i
The 3rd figure about ϕ1 impact on f′(η);
ii
The 10th figure about Ks impact on g(η);
iii
The 11th figure about δ* impact on g(η).

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Alam, M.W.; Hussain, S.G.; Souayeh, B.; Khan, M.S.; Farhan, M. Numerical Simulation of Homogeneous–Heterogeneous Reactions through a Hybrid Nanofluid Flowing over a Rotating Disc for Solar Heating Applications. Sustainability 2021, 13, 8289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Zhao, Q.; Xu, H.; Tao, L.; Pantokratoras, A. Discussion: ‘Homogeneous–Heterogeneous Reactions in Boundary-Layer Flow of a Nanofluid Near the Forward Stagnation Point of a Cylinder,’ (2017, ASME J. Heat Transfer 139(3), p. 034502). ASME J. Heat Transf. 2018, 140, 105501. [Google Scholar]
  3. Pantokratoras, A. Discussion: ‘Three-Dimensional Stagnation Flow and Heat Transfer of a Viscous, Compressible Fluid on a Flat Plate,’ (Mozayyeni, H.R., and Rahimi, A.B., 2013, ASME J. Heat Transfer, 135(10), p. 101702). ASME J. Heat Transf. 2018, 140, 115501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Pantokratoras, A. Discussion: “Heat and Mass Transfer Analysis in the Stagnation Region of Maxwell Fluid With Chemical Reaction Over a Stretched Surface,” [T. Hayat, M.I. Khan, M. Imtiaz, and A. Alsaedi, 2018, ASME J. Thermal Sci. Eng. Appl., 10(1), p. 011002]. ASME J. Therm. Sci. Eng. Appl. 2019, 11, 015502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Pantokratoras, A. Discussion: “Double Stratification in Flow by Curved Stretching Sheet With Thermal Radiation and Joule Heating,” [T. Hayat, S. Qayyum, M. Imtiaz, and A. Alsaedi, 2018, J. Therm. Sci. Eng. Appl., 10(2), p. 021010]. ASME J. Therm. Sci. Eng. Appl. 2019, 11, 065502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Pantokratoras, A. Comment on the paper “Joule heating and viscous dissipation in flow of nanomaterial by a rotating disk, Tasawar Hayat, Muhammad Ijaz Khan, Ahmed Alsaedi, Muhammad Imran Khan, International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer, 89(2017) 190–197”. Int. Commun. Heat Mass Transf. 2019, 103, 62–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Minkowycz, W.J.; Sparrow, E.M. Numerical solution scheme for local nonsimilarity boundary-layer analysis. Numer. Heat Transf. Part B Fundam. 1978, 1, 69–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Awad, M.M. Comments on “Dynamism of magnetohydrodynamic cross nanofluid with particulars of entropy generation and gyrotactic motile microorganisms”. Int. Commun. Heat Mass Transf. 2021, 123, 105229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Pantokratoras, A. A common error made in investigation of boundary layer flows. Appl. Math. Model. 2009, 33, 413–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Pantokratoras, A. Four usual errors made in investigation of boundary layer flows. Powder Technol. 2019, 353, 505–508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Article Metrics

Citations

Article Access Statistics

Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.