Next Article in Journal
Understanding Hazardous Waste Exports for Disposal in Europe: A Contribution to Sustainable Development
Previous Article in Journal
Optimization of Groundwater Exploitation in an Irrigation Area in the Arid Upper Peacock River, NW China: Implications for Sustainable Agriculture and Ecology
Previous Article in Special Issue
Urban Planning Policies to the Renewal of Riverfront Areas: The Lisbon Metropolis Case
Article

Counter-Mapping through Digital Tools as an Approach to Urban History: Investigating the Spatial Condition of Activism

Interuniversity Department of Regional and Urban Studies and Planning (DIST), Politecnico di Torino, Viale Pier Andrea Mattioli, 39, 10125 Torino, Italy
An earlier draft of this paper has been presented at the International Conference ‘Grand Projects—Urban Legacies of the Late 20th Century, that took plane online between 17 and 19 February 2021.
Academic Editors: Eduardo Medeiros, Paulo Tormenta Pinto, Ana Brandão and John Carman
Sustainability 2021, 13(16), 8904; https://doi.org/10.3390/su13168904
Received: 24 May 2021 / Revised: 27 June 2021 / Accepted: 5 August 2021 / Published: 9 August 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Urban Legacies of the Late 20th Century)
Cultural heritage has a central role in sustainable development, and it has the potential to re-imagine more democratic cities. Yet, critical theory has framed cultural heritage not only as the material remains of the past, but also as a dynamic interaction of humans with their past that encompasses tangible and intangible entities. Thus, it is necessary to research these dynamics to understand the role of cultural heritage as a resource for sustainable development. In this context, the main research question of this article is: “How does heritage is shaped and managed by the ‘present’? Can we understand this process through the opportunities of digital humanities?”. To confront this question, the research adapts the counter-mapping methodology with the digital humanities perspective focusing on the urban protest movements that took place in the historic areas of Istanbul throughout the 1960s. It is seen that the spatial pattern of these movements was the result of the urban operations of the 1950s. In the 1950s, an autocratic government shaped the urban space and redefined the urban heritage to concentrate more power. However, in the 1960s, workers and students used the very same spaces and again redefined the urban heritage by exercising their social rights. Based on these results, the main conclusion is that for revealing the full potential of cultural heritage in sustainable development, it is necessary to deepen our knowledge on how heritage operates in a society, considering that heritage changes meaning depending on the socio-political context of the period. View Full-Text
Keywords: counter-mapping; urban history; cultural heritage; digital humanities counter-mapping; urban history; cultural heritage; digital humanities
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Dinler, M. Counter-Mapping through Digital Tools as an Approach to Urban History: Investigating the Spatial Condition of Activism. Sustainability 2021, 13, 8904. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13168904

AMA Style

Dinler M. Counter-Mapping through Digital Tools as an Approach to Urban History: Investigating the Spatial Condition of Activism. Sustainability. 2021; 13(16):8904. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13168904

Chicago/Turabian Style

Dinler, Mesut. 2021. "Counter-Mapping through Digital Tools as an Approach to Urban History: Investigating the Spatial Condition of Activism" Sustainability 13, no. 16: 8904. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13168904

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop