Next Article in Journal
The Impact of the Technological Capability of a Host Country on Inward FDI in OECD Countries: The Moderating Roles of Institutional Quality
Next Article in Special Issue
Adaptation of HVAC Systems to Reduce the Spread of COVID-19 in Buildings
Previous Article in Journal
How (Un)sustainable Environments Are Related to the Diffusion of COVID-19: The Relation between Coronavirus Disease 2019, Air Pollution, Wind Resource and Energy
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Cross-Scale Analysis of the Correlation between Daytime Air Temperature and Heterogeneous Urban Spaces
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Implication of Petrographic Characteristics on the Mechanical Behavior of Middle Eocene Limestone, 15th May City, Egypt

by
Abdelaziz El Shinawi
1,
Peter Mésároš
2 and
Martina Zeleňáková
3,*
1
The Environmental Geophysics Lab (ZEGL), Department of Geology, Faculty of Science, Zagazig University, Zagazig 44511, Egypt
2
Institute of Technology, Economics and Management in Construction, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Technical, University of Košice, 042 00 Košice, Slovakia
3
Institute of Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Technical, University of Košice, 042 00 Košice, Slovakia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2020, 12(22), 9710; https://doi.org/10.3390/su12229710
Submission received: 19 October 2020 / Revised: 4 November 2020 / Accepted: 13 November 2020 / Published: 20 November 2020

Abstract

:
The construction purposes of carbonate rocks are considered a major aspect of using these bedrocks based on their mechanical behavior. Accordingly, the physical and mechanical characterization of Middle Eocene Limestone bedrock in the new urban area at the 15th May City, Egypt was studied to assess the suitability of the carbonate rocks for construction. This study has been carried out to investigate the effect of petrographic characteristics on mechanical properties. To achieve this objective, the intact 30 rock core samples from 15 boreholes were selected at different depths. Based on study of the selected samples in thin sections, the limestone in the area was classified as lime-mudstone, wackestone, and grainstone. Additionally, the uniaxial compressive strength (UCS) and Schmidt Rebound Hammer (Rn) were determined to detect the mechanical properties of the limestone bedrock. The measured parameters (UCS and Rn) demonstrated a high direct relationship with mudstone and a poor direct relationship with dolomite and high negative correlation with wackestone and grainstone. Therefore, the Middle Eocene Limestone bedrock is more durable and has medium-strength, which made it suitable for constructions. Regression analysis was performed to find out some linear relationship between mechanical properties (UCS) with petrographic characteristics. The study reveals significant positive correlation between UCS and Rn with mudstone in accordance higher values of regression coefficient (R2 = 0.91 and R2 = 0.036), and an inverse relationship of Rn with dolomite % (R2 = 0.89 and R2 = 0.02), respectively. Consequently, the strong confidence on the mechanical parameters opens the way for engineers to predict the mechanical parameters that are required for engineering properties of limestone for the urban expansion.

1. Introduction

Generally, limestone has been considered the main bedrock for roads, bridges, and tunnels construction, slope protection engineering, and water conservancy [1,2,3]. Recent expansion of the urban area over the surrounding desert land has directed the attention to investigate both the engineering and geological constrains on these new developments. This city was constructed on Eocene limestone beds intercalated with thin beds of clay and very thin beds of salt. In general, the Eocene limestone sediments in Egypt are characterized by karstification phenomena causing fractures, cracks, cavities, and land subsidence.
Peak strength and mechanical deformation characteristics of limestone directly relate to these projects’ stability and is therefore helpful to forecast risk [4,5,6,7]. Furthermore, research on the behavior of limestone under natural and experimental conditions is helpful in explaining rheological characteristics of upper crustal rocks, chemical and physical effects of fluid in geologic processes, the meaning of tectonophysics, structural adjustment of the upper crust, and dynamic processes of fault zone formation and evolution with fluid; it is also helpful in explaining seismogenic mechanisms and seismic wave propagation [8,9,10,11]. The study area, located at the northern part of 15th May City, 12 km to the southeast of Cairo, is one of the promised cities planned in 1986 by the Egyptian government through its program to withdraw the population from the condensed. It was proposed for the installation of a new industrial zone that shall contain housing and manufacturing facilities. New urban communities are located in the study area, some of which are in close proximity to such quarry locations such as 15th May city, south of Helwan City. Being constructed over a limestone plateau, the city is surrounded by an old quarry, which was moved to a distance of 5 km away from the city (Figure 1). Such quarry has been operated on a faulted area with weak zones of brittle materials [12]. The area encompasses seven new cities that have been partially constructed during the last decades. The cities are 10th Ramadan, El Ebour, New Cairo, El Amal, El Sherouk, 15 May, and Badr. Seven factors triggering landslides—slope angles, rock type, faults, elevation, seismic intensity zones, stream density, and land cover—were input to the model to produce a landslide susceptibility map. Such a map was used to examine the susceptibility of the locations of the seven new cities. The result revealed the high vulnerability of the locations of El Amal and 15 May Cities and a few zones including south of Cairo city [13,14]. In geotechnical and engineering projects, rock classifications are based on mechanical parameters such as uniaxial compressive strength (UCS), Point load, and Schmidt Rebound Hammer (Rn). These parameters are most widely used and adequate to characterize the mechanical behavior of rocks. The development of construction occupation increases the demands of construction materials and necessitates study on all sides of petrographic and mechanical properties of various rocks. Mechanical properties of intact rocks are greatly influenced by their textural characteristics. However, many researchers have conducted mineralogical studies on the limestone rocks [15,16,17,18,19]. Aggregate degradation (AD) commonly decreases particle angularity, surface texture, and size, and also diminishes the shear strength and grade of aggregate materials. In this case, AD is one of the main reasons accounting for the failure mechanism of aggregate materials. It is possible to predict AD properties from each kind of rock strength test based on rock types. Accordingly, using the equations obtained by tests to estimate the AD can be more economical and practical, especially in prefeasibility study, to predict the limits of allowable AD values for practical applications [20,21]. On the other hand, the validity of rocks to be used as construction material is the function of its mineralogical composition [16,22]. UCS of rocks aggregate is indirectly related to their mineral constituents, bioclasts, cement, and texture. Physical properties and mechanical behavior of rocks are influenced by modal mineral composition and grain size [23]. Physical properties of construction materials are directly related to UCS, mineralogical, and textural characteristics of rocks. Consequently, tests of the physical and mechanical properties were conducted for the collected rock core samples for determining the relation between mechanical behavior and mineralogical composition [6]. This study has been carried out to investigate the effect of petrographic characteristics on mechanical properties. These relations have their own effect for predicting the rock strength characteristic and their suitability for different engineering structures in 15th May City, southeast Cairo, for construction purposes, which are in close proximity to such quarry locations (Figure 1).

2. Geologic Setting

Topographically, the area has two plateaua separated by a topographically low area. Gabal Mokattam forms the northern plateau and is separated from the southern plateau by a topographically low area that is occupied by El-Maadi-Qatamia road [24].
The northern plateau slopes gently northwards where it disappears under the Oligocene sands and gravels of Gebel El-Ahmer. A relatively high escarpment and its northern side mark the southern plateau. It is known here as Tura-Hof-Observatory plateau. The Middle Eocene beds are mainly composed of limestone. These beds are found to be either unfossiliferous or containing badly preserved fossils. These beds were divided into two formations from bottom to top: The Gebel Hof and Observatory Formations. A brief description of both formations is as follows.
The stratigraphic succession of the study area is subdivided into the Mokattam and Maadi Groups. The Mokattam group is composed of the Gebel Hof Formation; it is the oldest exposed rock unit in the study area. It accomplishes about 121 m thick and is composed of white limestone, fine to medium, hard, and medium to thick bedded lithological unit (Figure 2). Observatory Formation: Stratigraphically, it is the highest formation of the Middle Eocene age. It is mainly composed of chalky and marly limestone forming the main quarrying horizons at Helwan town and the neighborhood. This formation is typically developed below the Helwan Observatory, forming the entire Observatory plateau and extending to the north where it is thrown down against the Gebel Hof Formation. It is made up of 136 m limestone and chalky limestone of different lithologies and textures. It is burrowed, laminated, thin bedded, and weathered. Consequently, in the Maadi group, these Upper Eocene sediments are overlying the Middle Eocene Mokattam group in the study area. It is divided into three formations; Qurn Formation is composed of 97 m thick sequence of marly and chalky limestone alternating with shales, sandy marls. Wadi Garawi Formation is composed of a 25 m thick poorly fossiliferous sandy shale section with a hard highly fossiliferous middle bed. Wadi Hof Formation is made up of the Late Eocene sediments that are composed of limestone, clays, marl, and sandstone, 65 m thick.

3. Materials and Methods

The mechanical behavior of the limestone samples was performed by the field and laboratory work. The field work represents rock sampling along the study area (Figure 1).
A total of 30 continuous core samples, intended to be representative of the foundation bedrock, 50 to 70 mm in diameter, were extracted from 15 boreholes with depths that ranged between 10 and 30 meters using diamond core bit fixed on rotary drilling machine. An extensive laboratory testing program was encountered to define the physical, mechanical properties, and petrographic characteristics of the rock material for the foundation bedrock. Consequently, the physical properties of the limestone samples along the study site were performed; water content [25], density [26], and specific gravity [27]. Furthermore, the mechanical parameters of the limestone intact core samples were determined by using the Schmidt rebound hammer and uniaxial compressive strength. The Schmidt hammer test was performed within 5° of vertical with the bottom of the piston at right angles to, and in firm contact with, the surface of the test specimen [28]. The Schmidt rebound hammer test was performed on N-type rock core specimens. Rock core specimens were steadily fixed in a steel cradle with a semi cylindrical machined slot of the same radius as the core, or firmly seated into a steel V-shaped block. Core rock samples, with a length-to-diameter ratio of 2.5–3.0, were prepared and flattened up to 0.02 mm with both sides smooth for uniaxial compression testing following the specifications of previous authors [29,30]. Since all the UCS tests were conducted on an NX sized core (54 ± 1 mm), all results were corrected by using relation [31] to rule out the influence of specimen volume. Selected representative intact core specimens of Middle Eocene limestones were prepared and tested for measuring their mechanical properties under uniaxial compression. A universal testing machine (Instron, Model 1128) was used for these tests. The loading system of this machine is a controlled strain type giving deformation speeds from 0.05 mm/min to 500 mm/min. The compressive force produced by this machine ranges from 10 gm to 50 Kg. The testing machine is provided with a plotter for producing testing. Additionally, the petrographical study of the selected samples was performed whereby five thin sections were prepared, examined under a microscope, and the limestone samples were classified. The limestones were examined by a Laboval-3 optical microscope in transmitted plane- (PPL) and cross-polarized light (XPL) to perform a semi-quantitative analysis of the components (texture, matrix composition, and grain types). Micrographs were simultaneously acquired by a Nikon Coolpix 990 digital camera at 1.2 megapixel. Limestone samples were categorized according to the classification of depositional textures of carbonate rocks proposed [29].

4. Results

4.1. Study Site Description

Three main rock types of layers were observed from the boreholes and the cross sections (Figure 3) as follows.
Surface layer characterizes overburden materials and composed of weathered limestone. The average thickness of this layer varies between 0.7 and 3 m. The middle layer is composed of argillaceous limestone facies with thickness ranges between 0.5 to 30 m. The bottom layer is characterized by highly argillaceous limestone bedrock with pockets of marl intercalations

4.2. Petrographic Characteristics and Depositional Environment

The investigated Middle Eocene limestone rock samples were texturally classified according to [29] into lime-mudstone, wackestone, and grainstone (Table 1). The major component, lime-mudstone, shows a high percentage of mud and fine materials, which varied in the range of 43% to 85% with a mean of 63.8% and a standard deviation of 13.64. However, wacketone was represented with a high percentage of grains in the range of 4% to 28% with a mean of 15.1% and a standard deviation of 7.09. The lime-mudstones are argillaceous and made up of shells from 1% to 7%. The matrix contains micrite with fine-grained materials, and secondary fissures are visible as white spots (Figure 4a). On the other hand, the wackestone carbonate rocks contained more than 10% calcite grains informed in micritic matrix and the matrix was recrystallized into sparry calcite (Figure 4b). The percent of grainstone ranged from 8% to 30% with and the Mean is 18.8%. The grainstone are argillaceous and made up of shells (10–40%) set in a micritic matrix. (Figure 4c). Dolomite was presented with a very low percent in fine material matrix, which varied in the range of 0% to 3% with a mean of 2.01 and a standard deviation of 2.01 (Figure 4d).
Additionally, lime-mudstone is the most abundant microfacies type in the Middle Eocene Limestone. It shows a high percentage of mud up to 85% and a rare presence of shells and some skeletal debris [32]. The second microfacies is wackestone, while grains are the main component up to 79%. Wackestone reflects that the sediments in this depositional environment were pointed to moderately agitated water conditions and fair circulation. Consequently, mudstone-wackestone is mainly composed of fine to medium grains embedded in fine materials matrix. Mudstone is recrystallized into sparry calcite and wackestone with dark patches of iron oxides. Furthermore, the depositional environments were distinguished by the studying of the performed thin sections. Three textural classes were detected; firstly, mudstone was deposited near the shore under quiet water, shallow depths, and poor circulation as a result of the fine-grained nature of their sediments [12,14]. The Middle Eoeene limestone is characterized by a micritic groundmass, fossils, and microfractures, which are filled with calcite crystals. This Middle Eocene unit was apparently deposited in a transgressive, open sublittoral, warm, and quiet sea [21].

4.3. Physical Rock Properties

The index properties of the limestone samples along the study site were distinguished. The natural water content ranged from 7.61% to 8.93%. Further, the bulk and dry density were in the range of (2.17–2.19%) and (2.05–2.08%). The specific gravity of the limestone samples ranged from 2.53% to 2.97% (Table 2). Consequently, the absorption rate for the limestone samples ranged from 3.07% to 8.71%. The samples that have low water absorption rates and low saturation degrees are, in general, relatively more durable [33].

4.4. Schmidt Rebound Hammer

Schmidit Rebound hammer Rn-values varied in the range of 23–33 with a mean of 28 and a standard deviation of 3.66 (Table 1). Rn-values have a high positive correlation with mudstone (R2 = 0.898) and a poor positive correlation with dolomite (R2 = 0.020) (Figure 5a,b), while Figure 4c,d indicates moderate inverse relationships with grainstone (R2 = 0.747) and a high negative correlation with wackestone (R2 = 0.822). The strength values from the Schmidt hammer ranges between 30 and 60 MPa and were classified as low to medium strength according to [34].

4.5. Uniaxial Compressive Strength

The UCS for the Middle Eocene Limestone ranges between 29.16 and 43.22 MPa with a mean of 36.29 MPa with a standard deviation of 3.18 (Table 2). The collected samples of the Middle Eocene foundation bedrock were classified according to the engineering classification of [34] as low to medium strength.
The initial part of the curve tends to be slightly concave upward reflecting the closing of microfractures and vugs within the cores (Figure 6). The measured strains during this stage for MiddIe Eocene Iimestones represent 40% of total strains. The curves become steeper at higher strains, and the sample exceeds the linear elastic limit giving a nonlinear relationship with gradually reduced values of deformation up to failure. At the end of the curve, large lateral deformations were also clear, compared to those experienced in the initial part. The UCS shows a high and poor direct relationship with mudstone and dolomite (R2 = 0.918 and 0.036), respectively (Figure 7a,b). However, UCS indicates a high negative correlation with wackestone and grainstone (R2 = 0.840 and 0.722) (Figure 7c,d). The UCS was plotted with Rn values (Figure 8). UCS can be determined from Rn; consequently, a positive correlation was estimated between UCS and Rn values. The plots of UCS with Rn indicate a high linear relationship (R2 = 0.885); on the whole, results were measured realistically to inspect their confidence on the mineralogical constituents of limestone.

5. Discussion

The physical properties of the selected samples from the Middle Eocene Limestone foundation bedrock were determined (Table 2). These include bulk density; specific gravity, water content, and absorption rate. The results of these properties point to the fact that water will be unable to make its way into limestone, therefore unable to promote damage in construction model structure [30], which proved that the building material′s surface with a low degree of water absorption and porosity will be little or not affected by weathering agents such as wind or rainfall. Supplementarily, the mechanical properties of the Middle Eocene Limestone foundation bedrock were determined by measuring the uniaxial compressive strength and Rn values. UCS and Rn in a straight line interrelated to mudstone, dolomite contents, and vary inversely with wackestone and grainstone (Figure 4). Additionally, mechanical properties are exposing a plain correlation with limestone constituents, but there are interactions with complementary characteristics. Mudstone has an individual express influence and effect on the mechanical behavior of the limestone (Table 1). The highest UCS of 43.22 MPa related to a maximum mudstone content of 85%. Petrographically, the foundation bedrock was texturally classified according to [29] into lime mudstone, wackestone, and mudstone-wackestone. Consequently, the mudstone is the result of cementation of carbonate muds, which consisted of varying percent of aragonite and calcite. Disbanding of aragonite in the argillaceous limestone provided the carbonate for the lithification and cementation of the limestones. The marls, which already underwent a volume decrease by aragonite decrease, lacked cement and became more compacted [22], which indicated high suitability for any construction. However, grainstone and wackestone have had an unhelpful effect on the mechanical properties of the Middle Eocene Limestone.
Accordingly, the lowest UCS (29.16%) value is linked to the highest percentage of grainstone (30%). Furthermore, the break-in grain size between mudstone and microspar is related to the mineralogical composition of the original Limestone-marl alternations, which are widespread forms of carbonate rocks [35,36]. Limestones in these alternations show asymmetrical structure with the highest carbonate content, a very low degree of compaction, and decrease the mechanical properties of the limestone, which leads to unsuitability for constructions. On the other hand, dolomite content individually does not expose the individual behavior with mechanical properties of the Middle Eocene Limestone owing to the lower percentage of it. Further, the contrasting characteristics such as Mudstone + Dolomite result in a high positive effect on the mechanical properties of the Middle Eocene Limestone. All previous interactions between limestone mineral constituents and mechanical parameters exposed moderate to high correlation. These interactions represent an attempt to construct a relationship and a consequential correlation between these parameters for similar rock types in different locations.

6. Conclusions

This study was carried out to investigate the effect of petrographic characteristics on mechanical properties.
Three layers were observed. They were composed of a surface layer that characterizes overburden materials that vary between 0.7 and 3 m. The middle layer is characterized by an argillaceous limestone with thickness ranges between 0.5 to 30 m. The bottom layer is composed of highly argillaceous limestone.
The physical properties proved that the building material′s surface has a low degree of water absorption and saturation and is, in general, relatively more durable; the water will be unable to make its way into limestone, therefore unable to promote damage in construction and will be little to not affected by weathering agents such as wind or rainfall.
Petrographically, the investigated Middle Eocene limestone rock samples are texturally classified into lime-mudstone, wackestone, and mudstone-wackestone in different proportions with a high percent of Mudstone.
Analysis of the mechanical properties of the Middle Eocene foundation bedrock indicates low to medium compressive strength (29.16 to 43.22 MPa). It is mainly composed of white, hard limestone together with a few thin beds of soft marl. The limestone beds are characterized by a low rate of absorption (3.07–8.71), and low water content indicates more durable, evading further compaction, making it suitable for construction.
The UCS shows a high and poor direct relationship with lime-mudstone and dolomite (R2 = 0.918 and 0.036), respectively. Furthermore, it indicates a high negative correlation with wackestone and grainstone (R2 = 0.840 and 0.722)
Rn-values have a high positive correlation with mudstone (R2 = 0.898) and a very poor positive correlation with dolomite (R2 = 0.020). Furthermore, it indicates inverse relationships with grainstone (R2 = 0.747) and wackestone (R2 = 0.822).
The Schmidit Rebound Hammer values demonstrated a high direct relationship with lime-mudstone and a poor direct relationship with dolomite and a high negative correlation with Wackestone and Grainstone.
As a final point, the mineral constituents are considered a major aspect of using them as construction materials as well as the mechanical behavior of limestone. Consequently, petrographic and mechanical properties are dependable for suitability assessment in manufacturing activities.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.E.S. and P.M.; methodology, A.E.S.; software, A.E.S.; validation, A.E.S, P.M., and M.Z.; formal analysis, M.Z.; investigation, A.E.S.; resources, P.M.; data curation, A.E.S.; writing—original draft preparation, A.E.S.; writing—review and editing, M.Z.; visualization, A.E.S.; supervision, P.M.; project administration, M.Z.; funding acquisition, P.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Acknowledgments

I am grateful to thank Zagazig Environmental Geophysics Lab (ZEGL) for helping us to perform the laboratory testing. A, El Shinawi would like to express appreciation to Samir Abdeltawab for discussions and valuable great support. Also I would like to thank an anonymous reviewer for suggestions and helpful comments. Thank for the support of project KEGA 059TUKE-4/2019 M-learning tool for intelligent modeling of building site parameters in a mixed reality environment. This work was supported by the Slovak Research and Development Agency under the contract no. APVV-17-0549.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Hala, A.; Mohamed, N.; Mohamed, N. Mapping landslide susceptibility using satellite data and spatial multicriteria evaluation: The case of Helwan District, Cairo. Appl. Geomat. 2014, 6, 215–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Freitas, T.S.; Guimarães, A.S.; Roels, S.; de Freitas, V.P.; Cataldo, A. Is the Time-Domain Reflectometry (TDR) Technique Suitable for Moisture Content Measurement in Low-Porosity Building Materials? Sustainability 2020, 12, 7855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. El-Shinawi, A. Instability improvement of the subgrade soils by lime addition at Borg El-Arab, Alexandria, Egypt. J. Afr. Earth Sci. 2017, 130, 195–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Miglio, B.; Willmott, T. Durability of stone for construction. In Journal of ASTM International Selected Technical Papers STP 1514; Durability of Building and construction, Sealants and Adhesives; ASTM: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2010; Volume 3, pp. 241–246. [Google Scholar]
  5. Abdeltawab, S. Karst Limestone Geohazards in Egypt and Saudi Arabia. Int. J. Geoeng. 2013, 2, 258–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Akram, M.S.; Farooq, S.; Naeem, M.; Ghazi, S. Prediction of mechanical behavior from mineralogical composition of Sakesar limestone, Central Salt Range, Pakistan. Bull. Eng. Geol. Environ. 2017, 76, 601–615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Zeleňáková, M.; Harabinová, S.; Mésároš, P.; Abd-Elhamid, H.; Purcz, P. Modelling of Erosion and Transport Processes. Water 2019, 11, 2604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Wilson, J.L. Carbonate Facies in Geologic History; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 1975; p. 290. [Google Scholar]
  9. Al-Nuaimi, S.; Banawi, A.A.; Al-Ghamdi, S.G. Environmental and Economic Life Cycle Analysis of Primary Construction Materials Sourcing under Geopolitical Uncertainties: A Case Study of Qatar. Sustainability 2019, 11, 6000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Abdelhamid, M.M.A.; Li, D.; Ren, G. Predicting Unconfined Compressive Strength Decrease of Carbonate Building Materials against Frost Attack Using Nondestructive Physical Tests. Sustainability 2020, 12, 1379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Eldeeb, H.; Zelenakova, M. Assessment of the economic value of irrigation water considering achieve main crops self-sufficiency: Case study Sharkia Governorate, Egypt. Sel. Sci. Pap. J. Civ. Eng. 2019, 14, 39–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Khaled, M.; Abdel Rahman, K.; Khattab, M. Facing the Drilling and Blasting Difficulties at Helwan Quarry, Egypt. Int. Soc. Explos. Eng. 2008, 1, 1–13. [Google Scholar]
  13. Mohamed, A.M.E.; Sultan, S.A.; Mahmoud, N.I. Delineation of near-surface structure in the southern part of 15th of May City, Cairo, Egypt Using geological, geophysical and geotechnical. Pure Appl. Geophys. 2012, 169, 1641–1654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Majid, T.; Mohammad, R.; Mohammad, B. Engineering properties and durability of limestones used in Persepolis complex, Iran, against acid solutions. Bull. Eng. Geol. Environ. 2016, 75, 967–978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Mohamed, A.M.; Mohamed, A.E.E.A. Mohamed Quarry blasts assessment and their environmental impacts on the nearby oil pipelines, southeast of Helwan City, Egypt. Nriag J. Astron. Geophys. 2013, 2, 102–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Basheer, A.A.; Atya, M.A.; Shokri, M.; Abu Shady, M.M. Application of ERT and SSR to detect the subsurface cave at 15th May City, Helwan, Egypt. Nriag J. Astron. Geophys. 2012, 1, 23–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. El-Shinawi, A. A comparison of liquid limit values for fine soils: A case study at the north Cairo-Suez district. Egypt. Geol. Soc. India 2016, 89, 339–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Ghrici, M.; Kenai, S.; Said-Mansour, C. Mechanical properties and durability of mortar and concrete containing natural pozzolana and limestone blended cements. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2007, 29, 542–549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Omar, H.M.; Ismail, N.R. The Suitability of Limestone from Pilaspi Formation (Middle-Late Eocene) for Building Stone in Koya Area, NE Iraq. ARO 2015, 3, 18–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Kamani, M.; Ajalloeian, R. Evaluation of the mechanical degradation of carbonate aggregate by rock strength tests. J. Rock Mech. Geotech. Eng. 2019, 11, 121–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Wei, L.; Xianjin, A.; Heping, L. Limestone mechanical deformation behavior and failure mechanisms: A review. Acta Geochim. 2018, 37, 153–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Munnecke, A.; Kiel, C.S. The Formation of Micritic Limestones and the Development of Limestone-Marl Alternations in the Silurian of Gotland, Sweden. Facies 1996, 34, 159–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Nabih, M.; El Shinawi, A. Qualitative analysis of clay minerals and swelling potential using gamma-ray spectrometry logs: A case study of the Bahariya Formation in the Western Desert, Egypt. Appl. Radiat. Isot. 2020, 166, 109384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. El-Nahhas, F.; Moustafa, A.; Abdel-Tawab, S. Geotechnical characteristics of limestone formations of Gebel Mokattam area. In Proceedings of the First Alexandria Conference on Structural and Geotechnical Engineering, Alexandria, Egypt, 1–3 December 1990; Volume 1, pp. 9–19. [Google Scholar]
  25. ASTM D2216. Standard Test Methods for Laboratory Determination of Water (Moisture) Content of Soil and Rock by Mass; ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. ASTM D6683. Standard Test Methods for Measuring Density; ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. ASTM D854. Standard Test Methods for Specific Gravity of Soil Solids by Water Pycnometer; ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. ASTM D5873. Standard Testing Method for Determination of Rock Hardness by Rebound Hammer Method; Annual Book of ASTM Standards; ASTM: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2001; Volume 4, p. 9. [Google Scholar]
  29. Dunham, R.J.; Ham, W.E. Classification of carbonate rocks according to depositional texture. Classification of carbonate rocks. Am. Assoc. Petrol. Geol. Mem. 1962, 1, 108–121. [Google Scholar]
  30. ISRM. Rock Characterization Testing and Monitoring; Brown, E., Ed.; Pergamon Press: Oxford, UK, 1981; p. 211. [Google Scholar]
  31. Hoek, E.; Brown, E.T. Empirical strength criterion for rock masses. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 1980, ASCE106 GT9, 1013–1035. [Google Scholar]
  32. Al-Wosabi, M.; Al-Aydrus, A. Microfacies Analysis and Depositional Environments of Tertiary Carbonate Sequences in Socotra Island, Yemen. Geol. Bull. Turk. 2011, 54, 57–80. [Google Scholar]
  33. Meng, J.; Pan, J. Correlation between petrographic characteristics and failure duration in clastic rocks. Eng. Geol. 2007, 89, 258–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Deere, D.U.; Miller, R.P. Engineering Classification and Index Properties for Intact Rock; Tech Report AFWL-TR; Air Force Weapons Lab: Bernalillo County, NM, USA, 1966; pp. 65–116. [Google Scholar]
  35. ASTM D2938. Standard Test Method for Unconfined Compressive Strength of Intact Rock Core Specimens; ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 1995; Available online: www.astm.org (accessed on 25 May 2020).
  36. Einsele, G.; Rickan, W.; Seilacher, A. (Eds.) Cycles and events in stratigraphy—Basic concepts and terms. In Cycles and Events in Stratigraphy; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1991; pp. 1–19. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Location map of the study area and the drilled boreholes.
Figure 1. Location map of the study area and the drilled boreholes.
Sustainability 12 09710 g001
Figure 2. (a) Geologic map of the northern part of 15th May City and (b) stratigraphic column showing the geological setting [13].
Figure 2. (a) Geologic map of the northern part of 15th May City and (b) stratigraphic column showing the geological setting [13].
Sustainability 12 09710 g002
Figure 3. (a) Drilled boreholes locations and cross sections; (b) composite log from the drilled boreholes in the study site based on collected intact rock samples.
Figure 3. (a) Drilled boreholes locations and cross sections; (b) composite log from the drilled boreholes in the study site based on collected intact rock samples.
Sustainability 12 09710 g003
Figure 4. Photomicrographs showing (a,b) lime-Mudstone C.N.; (c) sparry calcite Wackestone C.N.; (d) grainstone and dolomite crystals in fine-grained ground mass C.N. Sustainability 12 09710 i001 (for all thin sections, C.N Crossed Nichols).
Figure 4. Photomicrographs showing (a,b) lime-Mudstone C.N.; (c) sparry calcite Wackestone C.N.; (d) grainstone and dolomite crystals in fine-grained ground mass C.N. Sustainability 12 09710 i001 (for all thin sections, C.N Crossed Nichols).
Sustainability 12 09710 g004
Figure 5. Mean Schmidt Rebound hammer values (Rn) with percent of (a) mudstone, (b) dolomite, (c) wackestone, and (d) grainstone.
Figure 5. Mean Schmidt Rebound hammer values (Rn) with percent of (a) mudstone, (b) dolomite, (c) wackestone, and (d) grainstone.
Sustainability 12 09710 g005aSustainability 12 09710 g005b
Figure 6. Representative results of uniaxial compressive tests.
Figure 6. Representative results of uniaxial compressive tests.
Sustainability 12 09710 g006
Figure 7. Mean UCS with percent of (a) mudstone, (b) dolomite, (c) wackestone, and (d) grainstone.
Figure 7. Mean UCS with percent of (a) mudstone, (b) dolomite, (c) wackestone, and (d) grainstone.
Sustainability 12 09710 g007
Figure 8. Relationship between a UCS and Rn values.
Figure 8. Relationship between a UCS and Rn values.
Sustainability 12 09710 g008
Table 1. Middle Eocene Limestone composition, uniaxial compressive strength (UCS) and Schmidt Rebound Hammer (Rn) values.
Table 1. Middle Eocene Limestone composition, uniaxial compressive strength (UCS) and Schmidt Rebound Hammer (Rn) values.
Sample
No.
DepthLocationLimestone CompositionClassification NameUCS
(MPa)
Rn
Grains
<10%
Grains
>10%
Dol
(%)
Lacks Mud
(%)
S120BH477878Mudstone40.2931
S215BH21070019Wackestone38.5530
S37BH51365220Wackestone37.1128
S412BH101650528Wackestone35.2226
S520BH152055223Wackestone35.0026
S65BH31260018Wackestone36.4427
S72BH61069019Wackestone38.1530
S823BH72057221Wackestone34.2625
S915BH92545228grainstone32.6925
S1022BH5482113Wackestone36.2531
S112BH81650528Wackestone35.2226
S1216BH3107549Mudstone39.1632
S1318BH1458509Mudstone35.6632
S145BH21568314Wackestone37.228
S154BH52651023grainstone34.6625
S1614BH112847223grainstone31.6626
S1716BH3679015Wackestone41.5533
S1822BH71768314Wackestone36.5227
S1927BH102347030grainstone31.5025
S206BH91565317Wackestone36.2727
S219BH1558509Mudstone34.2632
S223BH13177069Mudstone38.8232
S237BH92649025Wackestone34.6625
S2412BH1775216Wackestone40.2231
S252BH1584110Mudstone-wackestone43.2231
S2628BH152545327Wackestone33.5224
S274BH142651023Wackestone34.6625
S286BH1876115Wackestone38.5530
S291BH72743030grainstone29.1623
S3012BH1970021Wackestone38.2729
Mean--15.1063.801.818.08-36.2928.07
Stdev 7.0913.642.01
(UCS) uniaxial compressive strength and (Rn) Schmidit rebound hammer.
Table 2. Index properties of the Middle Eocene limestone samples.
Table 2. Index properties of the Middle Eocene limestone samples.
Index PropertiesUnitResult
Specific gravity (Gs)-2.53–2.97
Water content (Wc)%7.61–8.93
bulk density (γwet)g/cm32.17–2.19
Dry density (γwet)g/cm32.05–2.08
Absorption%3.07–8.71
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Shinawi, A.E.; Mésároš, P.; Zeleňáková, M. The Implication of Petrographic Characteristics on the Mechanical Behavior of Middle Eocene Limestone, 15th May City, Egypt. Sustainability 2020, 12, 9710. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12229710

AMA Style

Shinawi AE, Mésároš P, Zeleňáková M. The Implication of Petrographic Characteristics on the Mechanical Behavior of Middle Eocene Limestone, 15th May City, Egypt. Sustainability. 2020; 12(22):9710. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12229710

Chicago/Turabian Style

Shinawi, Abdelaziz El, Peter Mésároš, and Martina Zeleňáková. 2020. "The Implication of Petrographic Characteristics on the Mechanical Behavior of Middle Eocene Limestone, 15th May City, Egypt" Sustainability 12, no. 22: 9710. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12229710

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop