Next Article in Journal
Soil Disturbance and Recovery after Coppicing a Mediterranean Oak Stand: The Effects of Silviculture and Technology
Previous Article in Journal
Prospective Analysis of Levels and Correlates of Physical Activity during COVID-19 Pandemic and Imposed Rules of Social Distancing; Gender Specific Study among Adolescents from Southern Croatia
Article

Online Place Branding: Is Geography ‘Destiny’ in a ‘Space of Flows’ World?

Faculty of Sociology and Communication, Transilvania University of Brașov, 500036 Brașov, Romania
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2020, 12(10), 4073; https://doi.org/10.3390/su12104073
Received: 17 April 2020 / Revised: 11 May 2020 / Accepted: 13 May 2020 / Published: 15 May 2020
(This article belongs to the Section Economic and Business Aspects of Sustainability)
Places have been promoting their attractions throughout history for almost a century now and place marketing started capturing the attention of economic researchers in the early 1990s. Although the globalized space has become a major interdisciplinary field of study in the past few decades, we still do not have a definite solution for measuring or predicting the changes it brings. The aim of this study is to propose an instrument to help scholars quantify the Web 1.0 and Web 2.0 components of the online presence of place brands and their spatial dynamics in a broader global context. By taking the ‘space of flows’ approach to frame globalization, we questioned whether geography is still destiny in the context of online place branding communication. To answer the question, we developed a category grid and applied it in the content analysis of 82 official country websites. We found that geographical position is still important in conditioning the adoption of Web 1.0, and does not make a significant difference in the adoption of Web 2.0. However, the strongest predictors of the adoption of Web 1.0 are not the ones related to geography, but to socio-economic inequality. It is therefore possible for the theorizations of the advantages of the ‘space of flows’ globalization to be suitable only for Web 2.0, Web 1.0 still being under the influence of the ‘space of place’. We discussed the implications of adopting the network society theory in place branding communication in order to nuance the understanding of the transitions from Web 1.0 to Web 2.0 and from Web 2.0 to Web 3.0 in place marketing. View Full-Text
Keywords: country brand; network society; place marketing; Web 2.0; virtual space country brand; network society; place marketing; Web 2.0; virtual space
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Briciu, V.-A.; Rezeanu, C.-I.; Briciu, A. Online Place Branding: Is Geography ‘Destiny’ in a ‘Space of Flows’ World? Sustainability 2020, 12, 4073. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12104073

AMA Style

Briciu V-A, Rezeanu C-I, Briciu A. Online Place Branding: Is Geography ‘Destiny’ in a ‘Space of Flows’ World? Sustainability. 2020; 12(10):4073. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12104073

Chicago/Turabian Style

Briciu, Victor-Alexandru, Cătălina-Ionela Rezeanu, and Arabela Briciu. 2020. "Online Place Branding: Is Geography ‘Destiny’ in a ‘Space of Flows’ World?" Sustainability 12, no. 10: 4073. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12104073

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop