Next Article in Journal
Constructing an Evaluation Model for User Experience in an Unmanned Store
Previous Article in Journal
Effect of Underground Coal Mining on the Regional Soil Organic Carbon Pool in Farmland in a Mining Subsidence Area
An updated version is available. Download PDF
Open AccessArticle

Power Market Equilibrium under the Joint FIP-RPS Renewable Energy Incentive Mechanism in China

1
Anhui Power Exchange Center Company Limited, Hefei 230061, China
2
College of Electrical Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2019, 11(18), 4964; https://doi.org/10.3390/su11184964
Received: 20 July 2019 / Revised: 19 August 2019 / Accepted: 5 September 2019 / Published: 11 September 2019
In order to support the development of renewable energy, countries around the world have adopted certain renewable energy incentive mechanisms, including feed-in tariff (FIT) and renewable portfolio standard (RPS). Based on the official report concerning renewable energy consumption issued by the Chinese government in 2018, FIT is no longer an ideal renewable incentive mechanism for China. The increasing financial burden of renewable subsidies on the government has prompted a transition from FIT to a more market-based RPS mechanism. However, the abrupt transformation from FIT to RPS without any transitions might potentially cause problems, including a lack of incentives for market participants and a high market risk. Feed-in premium (FIP), which is a transformation based on FIT, can increase the flexibility of the mechanism and play an important role in the transitional period. However, to date, there has only been limited research work that has explored the effect of implementing FIP-RPS in the development of renewable energy in China. It is still not clear how this transition could be carried out smoothly. Therefore, this research was aimed to devise a joint FIP-RPS mechanism and further develop the optimal combination ratio of the two, so as to obtain a socially optimal mechanism design. The simulation results showed that, at different stages of renewable energy development, FIP and RPS should be implemented according to their distinct characteristics, and the joint FIP-RPS mechanism should be combined with different ratios. It could be indicated that the proposed joint FIP-RPS mechanism not only excels at promoting renewable energy, but is also capable of maintaining desirable market prices and social welfare in this transitional period, as compared to FIP and RPS implemented alone. In the future, a certain degree of FIP-RPS implementations to this type of energy transition would be one of the preferred methods that could be implemented to have a considerable influence on China’s national energy plan. This is because the combination of the two mechanisms not only reduces the financial burden of the government, but also plays an active role in the renewable energy market.
Keywords: feed-in premium; joint FIP-RPS mechanism; power-market equilibrium model; renewable energy incentive policy; renewable portfolio standard feed-in premium; joint FIP-RPS mechanism; power-market equilibrium model; renewable energy incentive policy; renewable portfolio standard
MDPI and ACS Style

Cai, H.; Chen, J.; Dong, C.; Li, J.; Lin, Z.; He, C.; Jiang, Y.; Li, J.; Yang, L. Power Market Equilibrium under the Joint FIP-RPS Renewable Energy Incentive Mechanism in China. Sustainability 2019, 11, 4964.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map

1
Back to TopTop