Next Article in Journal
Furthering Internal Border Area Studies: An Analysis of Dysfunctions and Cooperation Mechanisms in the Water and River Management of Catalonia, Aragon and the Valencian Community (Spain)
Previous Article in Journal
Is It Time for a Reset in Arctic Governance?
Previous Article in Special Issue
Making Visible the Invisible: Why Disability-Disaggregated Data is Vital to “Leave No-One Behind”
 
 
Article

Balancing Institutions for Implementing the Sustainable Development Goals Through ‘Network Within Hierarchy’

RegNet School of Regulation and Global Governance, Australian National University, Canberra 2601, Australia
Sustainability 2019, 11(16), 4498; https://doi.org/10.3390/su11164498
Received: 24 May 2019 / Revised: 1 August 2019 / Accepted: 12 August 2019 / Published: 20 August 2019
Policy integration as the central theme of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) agenda calls for more networks for linking actors and policies. The national coordinators of SDGs implementation have maintained a steering hierarchy that creatively engages the network of ministries to develop and implement the National Strategy on Sustainable Development. The integration literature presents a gap in understanding the internal fights of the bureaucrats behind the glossy policy documents. The study relied on 53 in-depth interviews and public documents from Finland, Germany and the Czech Republic to reveal how bureaucrats design institutions to balance the network, hierarchy and market features by maximising the strengths of each mode. The analysis aimed to reveal how ‘Networks Within Hierarchy’ facilitates policy integration. It was found that the network deliberated slowly, rationally and personally. The supporting hierarchy provided direction, steered processes and finalised decisions, and the competitive market supplied choices of policy idea, killed bad ideas, and retained specialisation. When the network entered into endless debate, the coordinators forced a consensus through the hierarchy. Bureaucrats competed with each other in proposing better arguments for their ideas, lifting the quality of the deliberation and the consensus. View Full-Text
Keywords: policy integration; policy coordination; network; sustainable development; collaboration; institutional design policy integration; policy coordination; network; sustainable development; collaboration; institutional design
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Wong, R. Balancing Institutions for Implementing the Sustainable Development Goals Through ‘Network Within Hierarchy’. Sustainability 2019, 11, 4498. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11164498

AMA Style

Wong R. Balancing Institutions for Implementing the Sustainable Development Goals Through ‘Network Within Hierarchy’. Sustainability. 2019; 11(16):4498. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11164498

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wong, Ryan. 2019. "Balancing Institutions for Implementing the Sustainable Development Goals Through ‘Network Within Hierarchy’" Sustainability 11, no. 16: 4498. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11164498

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop