Next Article in Journal
Sensitivity Analysis in Socio-Ecological Models as a Tool in Environmental Policy for Sustainability
Next Article in Special Issue
A Study on Airbnb’s Trust Mechanism and the Effects of Cultural Values—Based on a Survey of Chinese Consumers
Previous Article in Journal
Multicriteria Approach towards the Sustainable Selection of a Teahouse Location with Sensitivity Analysis
Previous Article in Special Issue
Preventing Conflicts in Sharing Communities as a Means of Promoting Sustainability
 
 
Article

Online and Offline Communities in the Sharing Economy

Copernicus Institute of Sustainable Development, Utrecht University, Princetonlaan 8a, 3584 CB Utrecht, The Netherlands
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2018, 10(8), 2927; https://doi.org/10.3390/su10082927
Received: 30 June 2018 / Revised: 13 August 2018 / Accepted: 15 August 2018 / Published: 17 August 2018
The online community is crucial to sharing economy platforms because without it, no transactions can take place. Online communities have been studied extensively, but so far, little attention has been paid to how they link to different offline communities, such as geographic (e.g., neighborhoods) and relational communities (e.g., friends and colleagues). In this study, we address this gap by examining the importance of communities to the users and the entrepreneurs of the goods-sharing platform Ecomodo. We conduct a qualitative content analysis of archival and interview data to uncover the importance of different communities and the relationships among them. We discover that the platform design aimed to facilitate lending and borrowing in relational communities. However, geographic communities were more important to the users since most of them joined the platform to be acquainted with their neighbors. We also find that the platform entrepreneurs underestimated the behavioral changes needed to use the platform. The producers were not used to asking for money to lend their possessions, and it was difficult to teach consumers to borrow instead of buying. We use these findings to offer recommendations to practitioners and discuss some avenues for further research. View Full-Text
Keywords: sharing economy; collaborative consumption; sustainable business models; P2P platforms; online community; community sharing economy; collaborative consumption; sustainable business models; P2P platforms; online community; community
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Vaskelainen, T.; Piscicelli, L. Online and Offline Communities in the Sharing Economy. Sustainability 2018, 10, 2927. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10082927

AMA Style

Vaskelainen T, Piscicelli L. Online and Offline Communities in the Sharing Economy. Sustainability. 2018; 10(8):2927. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10082927

Chicago/Turabian Style

Vaskelainen, Taneli, and Laura Piscicelli. 2018. "Online and Offline Communities in the Sharing Economy" Sustainability 10, no. 8: 2927. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10082927

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop