Next Article in Journal
Ecological Pressure of Carbon Footprint in Passenger Transport: Spatio-Temporal Changes and Regional Disparities
Next Article in Special Issue
An Ontology-Underpinned Emergency Response System for Water Pollution Accidents
Previous Article in Journal
An Empirical Study on Entrepreneurial Orientation, Absorptive Capacity, and SMEs’ Innovation Performance: A Sustainable Perspective
Previous Article in Special Issue
Lake Area Analysis Using Exponential Smoothing Model and Long Time-Series Landsat Images in Wuhan, China
Open AccessArticle

Comparison of Modeling Grassland Degradation with and without Considering Localized Spatial Associations in Vegetation Changing Patterns

1
School of Remote Sensing and Information Engineering, Wuhan University, 129 Luoyu Road, Wuhan 430079, China
2
Shenyang Construction Engineering University, Shenyang 110044, China
3
Shenhua Baorixile Energy Company Limited, Hulunbuir 021025, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2018, 10(2), 316; https://doi.org/10.3390/su10020316
Received: 26 December 2017 / Revised: 18 January 2018 / Accepted: 23 January 2018 / Published: 26 January 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Methodological Advances in Research on Sustainable Ecosystems)
Grassland ecosystems worldwide are confronted with degradation. It is of great importance to understand long-term trajectory patterns of grassland vegetation by advanced analytical models. This study proposes a new approach called a binary logistic regression model with neighborhood interactions, or BLR-NIs, which is based on binary logistic regression (BLR), but fully considers the spatio-temporally localized spatial associations or characterization of neighborhood interactions (NIs) in the patterns of grassland vegetation. The BLR-NIs model was applied to a modeled vegetation degradation of grasslands in the Xilin river basin, Inner Mongolia, China. Residual trend analysis on the normalized difference vegetation index (RESTREND-NDVI), which excluded the climatic impact on vegetation dynamics, was adopted as a preprocessing step to derive three human-induced trajectory patterns (vegetation degradation, vegetation recovery, and no significant change in vegetation) during two consecutive periods, T1 (2000–2008) and T2 (2007–2015). Human activities, including livestock grazing intensity and transportation accessibility measured by road network density, were included as explanatory variables for vegetation degradation, which was defined for locations if vegetation recovery or no significant change in vegetation in T1 and vegetation degradation in T2 were observed. Our work compared the results of BLR-NIs and the traditional BLR model that did not consider NIs. The study showed that: (1) both grazing intensity and road density had a positive correlation to vegetation degradation based on the traditional BLR model; (2) only road density was found to positively correlate to vegetation degradation by the BLR-NIs model; NIs appeared to be critical factors to predict vegetation degradation; and (3) including NIs in the BLR model improved the model performance substantially. The study provided evidence for the importance of including localized spatial associations between the trajectory patterns for mapping vegetation degradation, which has practical implications for designing management policies to counterpart grassland degradation in arid and semi-arid areas. View Full-Text
Keywords: grassland degradation; binary logistic regression; spatial analysis; localized spatial association; vegetation grassland degradation; binary logistic regression; spatial analysis; localized spatial association; vegetation
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, Y.; Wang, Z.; Li, R.; Meng, X.; Ju, X.; Zhao, Y.; Sha, Z. Comparison of Modeling Grassland Degradation with and without Considering Localized Spatial Associations in Vegetation Changing Patterns. Sustainability 2018, 10, 316. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10020316

AMA Style

Wang Y, Wang Z, Li R, Meng X, Ju X, Zhao Y, Sha Z. Comparison of Modeling Grassland Degradation with and without Considering Localized Spatial Associations in Vegetation Changing Patterns. Sustainability. 2018; 10(2):316. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10020316

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Yuwei; Wang, Zhenyu; Li, Ruren; Meng, Xiaoliang; Ju, Xingjun; Zhao, Yuguo; Sha, Zongyao. 2018. "Comparison of Modeling Grassland Degradation with and without Considering Localized Spatial Associations in Vegetation Changing Patterns" Sustainability 10, no. 2: 316. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10020316

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Search more from Scilit
 
Search
Back to TopTop