Next Article in Journal
Vestibular Paroxysmia in Vestibular Neuritis: A Case Report
Previous Article in Journal
Quality of Life and Speech Perception in Two Late Deafened Adults with Cochlear Implants
 
 
Audiology Research is published by MDPI from Volume 10 Issue 2 (2020). Previous articles were published by another publisher in Open Access under a CC-BY (or CC-BY-NC-ND) licence, and they are hosted by MDPI on mdpi.com as a courtesy and upon agreement with PAGEPress.
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Electroacoustic Assessment of Wireless Remote Microphone Systems

by
Haniyeh Salehi
1,2,*,
Vijay Parsa
1,2,* and
Paula Folkeard
2
1
Electrical and Computer Engineering
2
National Centre for Audiology, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Audiol. Res. 2018, 8(1), 204; https://doi.org/10.4081/audiores.2018.204
Submission received: 20 November 2017 / Revised: 20 November 2017 / Accepted: 11 March 2018 / Published: 17 April 2018

Abstract

Wireless remote microphones (RMs) transmit the desired acoustic signal to the hearing aid (HA) and facilitate enhanced listening in challenging environments. Fitting and verification of RMs, and benchmarking the relative performance of different RM devices in varied acoustic environments are of significant interest to Audiologists and RM developers. This paper investigates the application of instrumental speech intelligibility and quality metrics for characterizing the RM performance in two acoustic environments with varying amounts of background noise and reverberation. In both environments, two head and torso simulators (HATS) were placed 2 m apart, where one HATS served as the talker and the other served as the listener. Four RM systems were interfaced separately with a HA programmed to match the prescriptive targets for the N4 standard audiogram and placed on the listener HATS. The HA output in varied acoustic conditions was recorded and analyzed offline through computational models predicting speech intelligibility and quality. Results showed performance differences among the four RMs in the presence of noise and/or reverberation, with one RM exhibiting significantly better performance. Clinical implications and applications of these results are discussed.
Keywords: Wireless remote microphone; speech quality; speech intelligibility; electroacoustic assessment; assistive listening devices Wireless remote microphone; speech quality; speech intelligibility; electroacoustic assessment; assistive listening devices

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Salehi, H.; Parsa, V.; Folkeard, P. Electroacoustic Assessment of Wireless Remote Microphone Systems. Audiol. Res. 2018, 8, 204. https://doi.org/10.4081/audiores.2018.204

AMA Style

Salehi H, Parsa V, Folkeard P. Electroacoustic Assessment of Wireless Remote Microphone Systems. Audiology Research. 2018; 8(1):204. https://doi.org/10.4081/audiores.2018.204

Chicago/Turabian Style

Salehi, Haniyeh, Vijay Parsa, and Paula Folkeard. 2018. "Electroacoustic Assessment of Wireless Remote Microphone Systems" Audiology Research 8, no. 1: 204. https://doi.org/10.4081/audiores.2018.204

APA Style

Salehi, H., Parsa, V., & Folkeard, P. (2018). Electroacoustic Assessment of Wireless Remote Microphone Systems. Audiology Research, 8(1), 204. https://doi.org/10.4081/audiores.2018.204

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop