Next Article in Journal
Characteristics of Multiple Sclerosis Patient Stance Control Disorders, Measured by Means of Posturography and Related to Brainstem Lesions
Previous Article in Journal
Intratympanic Injection of Dexamethasone for Treatment of Tinnitus in Patients with Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss
 
 
Audiology Research is published by MDPI from Volume 10 Issue 2 (2020). Previous articles were published by another publisher in Open Access under a CC-BY (or CC-BY-NC-ND) licence, and they are hosted by MDPI on mdpi.com as a courtesy and upon agreement with PAGEPress.
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Comparison of Auditory Brainstem Response Peak Measures Using Ear Lobe, Mastoid, and Custom Ear Canal Reference Electrodes

1
Department of Audiology and Speech Pathology, University of Arkansas at Little Rock and University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, AR, USA
2
Department of Biostatistics, University of Arkansasfor Medical Sciences, AR, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Audiol. Res. 2012, 2(1), e3; https://doi.org/10.4081/audiores.2012.e3
Submission received: 27 September 2011 / Revised: 17 November 2011 / Accepted: 12 December 2011 / Published: 10 January 2012

Abstract

Auditory brainstem response (ABR) peak measures were compared for a custom ear canal electrode and traditional mastoid and ear lobe reference electrode sites with the assumption that the ear canal electrode would yield larger Wave I amplitudes. In this study, Waves I, III, and V latencies and amplitudes were measured and compared in twenty participants between the ages of 18 and 50, with particular interest in a potential Wave I advantage using the custom ear canal reference electrode. The statistical analysis suggested that all reference electrode sites yielded comparable results with no statistical differences in peak latency or peak-to-trough amplitude for Waves I, III, and V. Although the custom ear canal electrode did not produce larger Wave I amplitudes over the other two references, a deeper placement of the ear canal electrode might have yielded different results.
Keywords: auditory brainstem response; ear canal; reference electrode; wave I auditory brainstem response; ear canal; reference electrode; wave I

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Atcherson, S.R.; Lim, T.J.; Moore, P.C.; Minaya, C.P. Comparison of Auditory Brainstem Response Peak Measures Using Ear Lobe, Mastoid, and Custom Ear Canal Reference Electrodes. Audiol. Res. 2012, 2, e3. https://doi.org/10.4081/audiores.2012.e3

AMA Style

Atcherson SR, Lim TJ, Moore PC, Minaya CP. Comparison of Auditory Brainstem Response Peak Measures Using Ear Lobe, Mastoid, and Custom Ear Canal Reference Electrodes. Audiology Research. 2012; 2(1):e3. https://doi.org/10.4081/audiores.2012.e3

Chicago/Turabian Style

Atcherson, Samuel R., Timothy J. Lim, Page C. Moore, and Carlos P. Minaya. 2012. "Comparison of Auditory Brainstem Response Peak Measures Using Ear Lobe, Mastoid, and Custom Ear Canal Reference Electrodes" Audiology Research 2, no. 1: e3. https://doi.org/10.4081/audiores.2012.e3

APA Style

Atcherson, S. R., Lim, T. J., Moore, P. C., & Minaya, C. P. (2012). Comparison of Auditory Brainstem Response Peak Measures Using Ear Lobe, Mastoid, and Custom Ear Canal Reference Electrodes. Audiology Research, 2(1), e3. https://doi.org/10.4081/audiores.2012.e3

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop