Taxonomic and Genomic Characterization of Enterococcus alishanensis JNUCC 77 Isolated from the Flowers of Zinnia elegans
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Isolation and Cultivation
2.2. Genome Sequencing, Assembly, and Quality Assessment
2.3. Genome-Based Phylogenomic Analysis Using Type Strain Genome Server (TYGS)
2.4. Clusters of Orthologous Groups (COG) Functional Classification of the Genome
2.5. Prediction of Biosynthetic Gene Clusters (BGCs)
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Genomic Features
3.2. Genome-Based Phylogenomic Analysis Using TYGS
3.3. Functional Genome Composition
3.4. Genome Mining and Secondary Metabolite Biosynthetic Gene Cluster Analysis
4. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Ramos, S.; Silva, V.; Dapkevicius, M.L.E.; Igrejas, G.; Poeta, P. Enterococci, from Harmless Bacteria to a Pathogen. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 1118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Krawczyk, B.; Wityk, P.; Gałęcka, M.; Michalik, M. The Many Faces of Enterococcus spp.-Commensal, Probiotic and Opportunistic Pathogen. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 1900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ben Braïek, O.; Smaoui, S. Enterococci: Between Emerging Pathogens and Potential Probiotics. Biomed. Res. Int. 2019, 2019, 5938210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ferchichi, M.; Sebei, K.; Boukerb, A.M.; Karray-Bouraoui, N.; Chevalier, S.; Feuilloley, M.G.J.; Connil, N.; Zommiti, M. Enterococcus spp.: Is It a Bad Choice for a Good Use—A Conundrum to Solve? Microorganisms 2021, 9, 2222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Elnar, A.G.; Kim, G.B. Probiotic potential and safety assessment of bacteriocinogenic Enterococcus faecalis CAUM157. Front. Microbiol. 2025, 16, 1563444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chung, J.H.; Otoguro, M.; Yanagida, F.; Wu, H.C.; Chang, Y.C.; Lee, Y.S.; Chen, Y.S. Enterococcus alishanensis sp. nov., a novel lactic acid bacterium isolated from fresh coffee beans. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2022, 72, 005255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chaudhary, A.; Prajapati, N.; Prajapati, A.; Singh, S.; Joshi, M.; Prajapati, D.; Patani, A.; Sahoo, D.K.; Patel, A. Postbiotic Emissaries: A Comprehensive Review on the Bioprospecting and Production of Bioactive Compounds by Enterococcus Species. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2024, 59, 6769–6782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Divyashri, G.; Krishna, G.; Muralidhara Prapulla, S.G. Probiotic attributes, antioxidant, anti-inflammatory and neuromodulatory effects of Enterococcus faecium CFR 3003: In vitro and in vivo evidence. J. Med. Microbiol. 2015, 64, 1527–1540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pristavu, M.C.; Diguță, F.C.; Aldea, A.C.; Badea, F.; Dragoi Cudalbeanu, M.; Ortan, A.; Matei, F. Functional Profiling of Enterococcus and Pediococcus Strains: An In Vitro Study on Probiotic and Postbiotic Properties. Microorganisms 2025, 13, 1348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Han, K.I.; Shin, H.D.; Lee, Y.; Baek, S.; Moon, E.; Park, Y.B.; Cho, J.; Lee, J.H.; Kim, T.J.; Manoharan, R.K. Probiotic and Postbiotic Potentials of Enterococcus faecalis EF-2001: A Safety Assessment. Pharmaceuticals 2024, 17, 1383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hayes, R.A.; Rebolleda-Gómez, M.; Butela, K.; Cabo, L.F.; Cullen, N.; Kaufmann, N.; O’Neill, S.; Ashman, T.L. Spatially explicit depiction of a floral epiphytic bacterial community reveals role for environmental filtering within petals. Microbiologyopen 2021, 10, e1158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Burgess, E.C.; Schaeffer, R.N. The Floral Microbiome and Its Management in Agroecosystems: A Perspective. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2022, 70, 9819–9825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Koza, N.A.; Adedayo, A.A.; Babalola, O.O.; Kappo, A.P. Microorganisms in Plant Growth and Development: Roles in Abiotic Stress Tolerance and Secondary Metabolites Secretion. Microorganisms 2022, 10, 1528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kim, M.; Kim, S.J.; Cha, I.T.; Park, S.J. Revealing the Prokaryotic Microbial Community Structures and their Ecological Potentials in Manjanggul Cave, a Lava Tube on Jeju Island. Curr. Microbiol. 2025, 82, 331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, M.J.; Kim, S.J.; Kim, S.S.; Lee, N.H.; Hyun, C.G. Hypochoeris radicata attenuates LPS-induced inflammation by suppressing p38, ERK, and JNK phosphorylation in RAW 264.7 macrophages. EXCLI J. 2014, 13, 123–136. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Prjibelski, A.; Antipov, D.; Meleshko, D.; Lapidus, A.; Korobeynikov, A. Using SPAdes De Novo Assembler. Curr. Protoc. Bioinform. 2020, 70, e102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Parks, D.H.; Imelfort, M.; Skennerton, C.T.; Hugenholtz, P.; Tyson, G.W. CheckM: Assessing the quality of microbial genomes recovered from isolates, single cells, and metagenomes. Genome Res. 2015, 25, 1043–1055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, I.; Chalita, M.; Ha, S.M.; Na, S.I.; Yoon, S.H.; Chun, J. ContEst16S: An algorithm that identifies contaminated prokaryotic genomes using 16S RNA gene sequences. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2017, 67, 2053–2057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Meier-Kolthoff, J.P.; Göker, M. TYGS is an automated high-throughput platform for state-of-the-art genome-based taxonomy. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 2182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lefort, V.; Desper, R.; Gascuel, O. FastME 2.0: A Comprehensive, Accurate, and Fast Distance-Based Phylogeny Inference Program. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2015, 32, 2798–2800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yoon, S.H.; Ha, S.M.; Lim, J.; Kwon, S.; Chun, J. A large-scale evaluation of algorithms to calculate average nucleotide identity. Antonie Leeuwenhoek 2017, 110, 1281–1286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Seemann, T. Prokka: Rapid prokaryotic genome annotation. Bioinformatics 2014, 30, 2068–2069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cantalapiedra, C.P.; Hernández-Plaza, A.; Letunic, I.; Bork, P.; Huerta-Cepas, J. eggNOG-mapper v2: Functional Annotation, Orthology Assignments, and Domain Prediction at the Metagenomic Scale. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2021, 38, 5825–5829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Elsakhawy, O.K.; Abouelkhair, M.A. Genome Mining Reveals a Sactipeptide Biosynthetic Cluster in Staphylococcus pseudintermedius. Vet. Sci. 2025, 12, 635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Blin, K.; Szenei, J.; Vader, L. Using antiSMASH. Methods Enzymol. 2025, 717, 1–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Blin, K.; Shaw, S.; Vader, L.; Szenei, J.; Reitz, Z.L.; Augustijn, H.E.; Cediel-Becerra, J.D.D.; de Crécy-Lagard, V.; Koetsier, R.A.; Williams, S.E.; et al. antiSMASH 8.0: Extended gene cluster detection capabilities and analyses of chemistry, enzymology, and regulation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2025, 53, W32–W38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zdouc, M.M.; Blin, K.; Louwen, N.L.L.; Navarro, J.; Loureiro, C.; Bader, C.D.; Bailey, C.B.; Barra, L.; Booth, T.J.; Bozhüyük, K.A.J.; et al. MIBiG 4.0: Advancing biosynthetic gene cluster curation through global collaboration. Nucleic Acids Res. 2025, 53, D678–D690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhong, Z.; Zhang, W.; Song, Y.; Liu, W.; Xu, H.; Xi, X.; Menghe, B.; Zhang, H.; Sun, Z. Comparative genomic analysis of the genus Enterococcus. Microbiol. Res. 2017, 196, 95–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hayat, Z.; Shahzad, K.; Ali, H.; Casini, R.; Naveed, K.; Hafeez, A.; El-Ansary, D.O.; Elansary, H.O.; Fiaz, S.; Abaid-Ullah, M.; et al. 16S rRNA gene flow in Enterococcus spp. and SNP analysis: A reliable approach for specie level identification. Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 2022, 103, 104445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qiu, X.; Ye, K.; Ma, Y.; Zhao, Q.; Wang, L.; Yang, J. Genome sequence-based species classification of Enterobacter cloacae complex: A study among clinical isolates. Microbiol. Spectr. 2024, 12, e0431223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhong, Z.; Kwok, L.Y.; Hou, Q.; Sun, Y.; Li, W.; Zhang, H.; Sun, Z. Comparative genomic analysis revealed great plasticity and environmental adaptation of the genomes of Enterococcus faecium. BMC Genom. 2019, 20, 602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Filannino, P.; Di Cagno, R.; Gobbetti, M. Metabolic and functional paths of lactic acid bacteria in plant foods: Get out of the labyrinth. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2018, 49, 64–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Armstrong, G.A. Genetics of eubacterial carotenoid biosynthesis: A colorful tale. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 1997, 51, 629–659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]




| Enterococcus sp. Strain JNUCC 77 | |
|---|---|
| Genome size (bp) | 3,857,120 |
| Total number of contigs | 5 |
| Contigs N50 (bp) | 2,616,578 |
| G + C content (%) | 35.60 |
| Total number of predicted genes | 3826 |
| Total number of protein-coding genes | 3826 |
| Total number of pseudogenes | 1336 |
| Total number of tRNA-coding genes | 64 |
| Total number of rRNA-coding genes (5S, 16S, 23S) | 15 |
| Subject Strain | dDDH (d0, in %) | C.I. (d0, in %) | dDDH (d4, in %) | C.I. (d4, in %) | dDDH (d6, in %) | C.I. (d6, in %) | G + C Content Difference (in %) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Enterococcus alishanensis ALS3 | 87.9 | [84.4–90.7] | 94.7 | [93.1–96.0] | 91.6 | [89.1–93.6] | 0 |
| Streptococcus alactolyticus CCUG 27297 | 12.8 | [10.1–16.1] | 47.9 | [45.3–50.5] | 13.2 | [10.9–16.0] | 4.88 |
| Enterococcus porcinus ATCC 700913 | 13.2 | [10.5–16.5] | 30.7 | [28.3–33.2] | 13.6 | [11.2–16.4] | 0.58 |
| Enterococcus saigonensis JCM 31193 | 13.3 | [10.6–16.6] | 29.2 | [26.8–31.7] | 13.7 | [11.3–16.5] | 0.67 |
| Enterococcus lemanii DSM 105069 | 13.2 | [10.5–16.5] | 26.8 | [24.5–29.3] | 13.6 | [11.2–16.4] | 1.62 |
| Enterococcus eurekensis CCUG 61259 | 13.2 | [10.4–16.5] | 24 | [21.7–26.4] | 13.5 | [11.2–16.3] | 1.02 |
| Enterococcus casseliflavus NBRC 100478 | 12.9 | [10.2–16.2] | 23.2 | [20.9–25.7] | 13.3 | [11.0–16.1] | 6.75 |
| Enterococcus lactis DSM 23655 | 13 | [10.3–16.3] | 22.9 | [20.6–25.4] | 13.4 | [11.0–16.2] | 2.53 |
| Enterococcus devriesei DSM 22802 | 14 | [11.2–17.4] | 21.8 | [19.6–24.3] | 14.3 | [11.9–17.1] | 4.63 |
| Enterococcus faecalis NBRC 100480 | 13.2 | [10.5–16.5] | 21.8 | [19.6–24.3] | 13.5 | [11.2–16.3] | 1.92 |
| Enterococcus raffinosus NBRC 100492 | 14 | [11.2–17.4] | 21.7 | [19.5–24.1] | 14.3 | [11.8–17.1] | 3.76 |
| Enterococcus xiangfangensis NCIMB 14834 | 14.3 | [11.4–17.6] | 21.3 | [19.0–23.7] | 14.5 | [12.0–17.3] | 3.41 |
| Enterococcus xiangfangensis DSM 105127 | 14.3 | [11.4–17.6] | 21.3 | [19.1–23.8] | 14.5 | [12.1–17.3] | 3.42 |
| Enterococcus pingfangensis NCIMB 15185 | 14 | [11.2–17.4] | 20.7 | [18.5–23.1] | 14.3 | [11.8–17.1] | 4.46 |
| Enterococcus hailinensis N48-2 | 14.5 | [11.7–17.9] | 20.1 | [17.8–22.5] | 14.7 | [12.2–17.5] | 1.68 |
| Enterococcus florum Gos25-1 | 13.5 | [10.7–16.8] | 20 | [17.8–22.4] | 13.8 | [11.4–16.6] | 6.77 |
| Enterococcus pallens ATCC BAA-351 | 14.3 | [11.5–17.7] | 19.9 | [17.7–22.3] | 14.5 | [12.0–17.3] | 4.45 |
| Enterococcus hermanniensis DSM 17122 | 14.6 | [11.8–18.0] | 19.7 | [17.5–22.1] | 14.8 | [12.3–17.6] | 1.75 |
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| OrthoANIu value (%) | 99.39 |
| Enterococcus sp. Strain JNUCC 77 length (bp) | 3,854,580 |
| E. alishanensis length (bp) | 3,708,720 |
| Average aligned length (bp) | 2,415,695 |
| Enterococcus sp. Strain JNUCC 77 coverage (%) | 62.67 |
| E. alishanensis coverage (%) | 65.14 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Hyun, K.-A.; Kim, J.-H.; Ko, M.N.; Hyun, C.-G. Taxonomic and Genomic Characterization of Enterococcus alishanensis JNUCC 77 Isolated from the Flowers of Zinnia elegans. Microbiol. Res. 2025, 16, 259. https://doi.org/10.3390/microbiolres16120259
Hyun K-A, Kim J-H, Ko MN, Hyun C-G. Taxonomic and Genomic Characterization of Enterococcus alishanensis JNUCC 77 Isolated from the Flowers of Zinnia elegans. Microbiology Research. 2025; 16(12):259. https://doi.org/10.3390/microbiolres16120259
Chicago/Turabian StyleHyun, Kyung-A, Ji-Hyun Kim, Min Nyeong Ko, and Chang-Gu Hyun. 2025. "Taxonomic and Genomic Characterization of Enterococcus alishanensis JNUCC 77 Isolated from the Flowers of Zinnia elegans" Microbiology Research 16, no. 12: 259. https://doi.org/10.3390/microbiolres16120259
APA StyleHyun, K.-A., Kim, J.-H., Ko, M. N., & Hyun, C.-G. (2025). Taxonomic and Genomic Characterization of Enterococcus alishanensis JNUCC 77 Isolated from the Flowers of Zinnia elegans. Microbiology Research, 16(12), 259. https://doi.org/10.3390/microbiolres16120259

