You are currently viewing a new version of our website. To view the old version click .
Neurology International
  • Systematic Review
  • Open Access

9 April 2025

The Relationship Between Clinical Features of Ischemic Stroke and miRNA Expression in Stroke Patients: A Systematic Review

,
and
1
Department of Neurology, Stroke, and Early Post-Stroke Rehabilitation, University Clinical Hospital No. 4, 20-954 Lublin, Poland
2
Department of Neurology, Medical University of Lublin, 20-954 Lublin, Poland
3
Department of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Management, “Sapienza” University of Rome, 00184 Rome, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
This article belongs to the Collection Biomarkers in Stroke Prognosis

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Ischemic stroke remains a leading cause of death and disability worldwide. Despite significant progress in reperfusion therapy, the optimal ischemic stroke management strategy has not been developed. Recent studies demonstrate that microRNA may play an essential role in the pathophysiology of ischemic stroke and its possible potential to be a treatment target point. The proposed systematic review aimed to report the relationship between IS’s clinical severity and miRNA expression. Secondary outcomes included infarct volume, systemic inflammatory markers, and prognosis, as well as additional features such as stroke subtype, comorbidity, and risk of subsequent stroke in correlation to miRNA expression. Methods: We have performed a systematic search of database resources according to PRISMA statement guidelines. Twenty-seven studies on a total number of 3906 patients were assessed as suitable for the present SR. Included studies analyzed the expression of 30 different miRNA fragments. Results: After investigating available data, we have identified a set of possible miRNA fragment candidates that may be used in stroke diagnostics and have the potential to be a base for the development of future treatment protocols. Conclusions: Studies included in the presented SR indicate that miRNA expression may be significantly associated with clinical severity, infarct volume, and inflammation in ischemic stroke. More prospective, properly designed protocols with consistent methods of miRNA testing and optimized clinical assessment are needed to confirm the role of miRNA expression in the course of a stroke.

1. Introduction

Ischemic stroke (IS) remains a leading cause of death and disability worldwide []. Despite decades of research into risk factors, therapies, and preventative measures, the optimal management strategy for the treatment of IS has not been developed. As demonstrated in recent studies, microRNA (miRNA) may play a vital role in the pathophysiology of IS []. Alterations in miRNA have been proven to impact detrimental processes at different stages of ischemic brain injury, such as neuroinflammation, oxidative stress reactions, blood–brain barrier permeability [,,], and neuroplasticity in post-stroke recovery [,]. Numerous miRNA-based therapies are undergoing clinical trials for different pathologic conditions, indicating their possible therapeutic significance []. At the same time, growing evidence confirms that miRNAs can serve as biomarkers that help predict, diagnose, and evaluate the prognosis in IS patients [,] and become a potential therapeutic target in ischemic brain injury [].
Despite recent advances in reperfusion treatment, IS’s clinical and anatomical severity still strongly correlates with patients’ future outcomes []. Standardized and valid laboratory tests evaluating the extent of ischemic brain injury are missing. The assessment of miRNA expression could potentially serve as a diagnostic tool in monitoring IS progression, predicting patient recovery, and, finally, enabling the search for novel treatment strategies.
This systematic review aims to present clinical evidence for the relationship between miRNA expression and anatomical and clinical features in IS.

2. Materials and Methods

A systematic search of database resources, PubMed, Science Direct, and Cochrane Library, was independently performed by two researchers according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) statement guidelines. The study has been registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) database (registration number CRD42023472594) [].
The following keywords were used: microRNA AND ischemic stroke OR ischemic brain injury. The applied filters were studies published until April 2024, full-length articles (no abstracts), human adult population (older than 18 years), and English language. The literature search included references from reviews and original articles. Duplicates were eliminated []. Case-control, cross-sectional, cohort studies, and case series that included more than five patients and reported the correlation between plasma and serum miRNA expression in ischemic stroke patients and IS clinical and anatomical characteristics were eligible for the present SR. Data extraction also included other reported features associated with miRNA in IS patients, such as level of inflammatory parameters, prognosis, stroke etiology type, and IS recurrence rate. Case reports, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses were excluded from the search. The risk of bias assessment was based on the RoB2 assessment tool. Bias items were assessed separately for each included study (Figure 1).
Figure 1. Risk of bias assessment for the included studies [].
The primary outcome was to report on the relationship between IS clinical severity and miRNA expression in stroke patients. The secondary outcomes included infarct volume, systemic inflammatory markers, prognosis, and additional features such as stroke subtype, comorbidity, and the risk of subsequent IS in correlation to miRNA expression in stroke patients.

3. Results

The database search led to 4595 matching articles. After screening for eligibility, 4568 articles were excluded, as they did not match the inclusion criteria (Figure 2). Twenty-seven studies, including a total number of 3906 patients, were assessed as suitable for the present SR (four prospective cohort studies and 23 prospective case-control studies) (Table 1). In the selected studies, expression of plasma and serum miRNA in IS patients was reported in correlation with six outcomes: clinical severity; infarct volume; systemic inflammatory markers; prognosis; stroke etiology subtype; and risk of stroke recurrence. The included articles assessed the expression of 30 different miRNA fragments.
Figure 2. PRISMA flow chart [].
Table 1. Data extraction form.

3.1. The Relationship Between Clinical Severity of IS and miRNA Expression

All the included studies (27 articles, 3906 patients) report on the relationship between clinical severity of IS and expression of selected miRNA [,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,]. Clinical severity was measured using the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) at admission as well as the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) and Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS). Studies analyzing the relationship between the clinical severity of IS and miRNA expression included the assessment of 30 different miRNA fragments (Table 2). The majority of the selected studies (24/27 studies, 3430 patients) used NIHSS to measure clinical severity [,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,]. In eight studies including 804 patients, clinical assessment was performed using mRS [,,,,,,,]. In one study on 216 patients, GOS assessment was used to measure clinical severity [].
Table 2. Outcome summary table.
A positive correlation between clinical severity of IS and increased miRNA expression was reported in 14 studies that evaluated 15 different miRNA fragments: miR-9, miR-101, miR-124, miR-125b-5p, miR-128, miR-134, miR-143, miR-146b, miR-185, miR-206, miR-218, miR-222, miR-223, miR-488, and miR-602 (Table 2) [,,,,,,,,,,,,,]. The most pronounced positive correlation was reported for miR-125b-5p (three studies: one case-control and two cohort studies, including 218 stroke patients), miR-218 (two studies: both case-control, including 254 stroke patients), and miR-143 (one case-control study with 170 stroke patients).
A negative correlation between clinical severity and the level of miRNA expression was reported in 12 studies including 12 different miRNA fragments: miR-9, miR-16, miR-21, miR-24, miR-29b, miR-34a-5p, miR-124, miR-126, miR-130, miR-152-3p, miR-378, and miR-497 [,,,,,,,,,,]. The negative correlation was most identifiable for miR-29b (three case-control studies, including a sum of 288 patients), miR-126 and miR-130 (two case-control studies on 254 patients), and miR-21 (one case-control study with 170 patients)
Extracted data on the relationship between the clinical severity of IS and miRNA expression were mixed in the cases of miR-9, miR124, and miR-128, indicating positive, negative, or no correlation, depending on the study.

3.2. The Relationship Between Infarct Volume at Admission and miRNA Expression

The correlation between infarct volume and miRNA expression was assessed in 12 studies, including 1390 patients [,,,,,,,,,,,]. Infarct volume was measured using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) performed at admission within 24 to 72 h of IS onset, depending on the protocol. Studies that included infarct volume as an outcome measure assessed the expression of 11 different miRNA fragments. (Table 2)
A positive correlation between the IS infarct volume and miRNA expression was reported for miR-9, miR-124, miR-125b-5p, miR-128, miR-134, miR-146b, and miR-206 [,,,,]. The association was most pronounced for miR125b-5p (two studies: one case-control, one cohort, 134 patients).
Three studies assessing the relationship between the infarct volume and the expression of miR-9, miR-29b, miR-34a-5p, and miR-124 reported a negative correlation [,,].
Four studies on miR-93, miR-124, miR-128, and miR-223 reported no significant association between IS infarct volume and miRNA expression level [,,,].
Data on the association between infarct volume and miR-9, miR-124, and miR-128 expression were inconsistent.

3.3. The Relationship Between Systemic Inflammatory Markers and miRNA Expression

A total of 11 studies included in this SR analyzing the data from 1906 subjects reported on the relationship between the level of systemic inflammatory markers or oxidative stress indicators and the expression of miRNA fragments. These studies reported on the expression of 10 different miRNA fragments (Table 2). Analyzed laboratory parameters included CRP, IL-1 beta, IL-6, IL-2, IL-8, IL- 10, IL-17, IL-22, TNF-α, SOD, and MDA concentration [,,,,,,,,,,] measured throughout hospitalization; timing differed depending on the protocol.
Six of the included studies on miR-9, miR124, miR-134, miR-143, miR-146, and miR-497 reported a positive correlation between elevated levels of inflammatory and oxidative stress parameters and miRNA expression [,,,,,].
In five studies on miR-9, miR-21, miR-93, miR-124, miR-126, and miR-130, the negative correlation between the level of systemic inflammatory markers and miRNA expression was confirmed [,,,,].
Data regarding the relationship between the level of systemic inflammatory markers and the expression of miR-9 and miR-124 were inconsistent.

3.4. The Relationship Between Prognosis and miRNA Expression

Three studies assessing four different miRNA fragments (Table 2) reported a correlation between patients’ prognosis after IS and miRNA expression [,,]. A worse prognosis was defined as mRS > 2 at 3 months of follow-up [,] or elevated GOS scores at discharge [].
One case-control prospective study confirmed the association between elevated expression of miR-134 and worse prognosis [].
Two studies reported the relationship between poor prognosis and low miR-9, miR-24, and miR-124 expression in IS patients [,].

3.5. The Relationship Between Stroke Etiology Subtype and miRNA Expression

Four included studies on four different miRNA fragments (Table 2) analyzed the correlation between specific etiology subtypes of stroke and the level of miRNA expression [,,,].
Three studies reported no significant correlation between stroke subtype and miRNA expression (miR-124, miR-223, miR-488).
One of the included studies demonstrated a significant decrease in miR-152-3p during large-artery atherosclerosis.

3.6. The Relationship Between the Risk of Stroke Recurrence and miRNA Expression

Two case-control prospective studies, including three different miRNA fragments, assessed the relationship between the risk of subsequent stroke episodes and the expression of selected miRNA [,]. Presented data reported a negative correlation between the risk of stroke recurrence and the level of miRNA expression (miR-21, miR-126, and miR-130).

4. Discussion

The present SR reports available data on the relationship between miRNA expression in stroke patients and selected IS features, such as clinical severity, infarct volume, systemic inflammatory and oxidative stress markers level, prognosis, IS etiology subtype, and the risk of stroke recurrence. This work aimed to analyze the role of miRNA in IS and to identify miRNA fragment candidates for diagnostic biomarkers and possible future treatment targets. The results of the included studies reported on both enhanced and downregulated miRNA expression in IS patients; therefore, the correlation between miRNA expression and clinical severity, infarct volume, systemic inflammatory markers, prognosis, and the risk of stroke recurrence varied for different miRNA fragments (Table 2).
The binary correlations between miRNA expression and selected clinical outcomes in IS patients suggest that different miRNA fragments may be involved in various pathological and protective reactions following ischemic brain injury. Numerous researchers investigated the role of specific miRNA fragments in stroke. Research on animal studies reports that miRNA expression in the course of ischemic injury may be related to energy failure, excitotoxicity, inflammation, oxidative stress, cell death, and brain–blood barrier disruption []. As a result, these may affect both the lesion volume and neurological deficit []. Accumulative data indicate that particular miRNAs play a significant part in the development of inflammatory responses in the course of stroke []. The expression of miR-181c, miR-216a, miR-3437b, and miR-126-3p or -5p are reported to be linked with the post-ischemic CNS levels of TNF [,,]. A part of the inflammatory response to ischemia is the upregulation of the expression of adhesion molecules which facilitates adherence of leukocytes and increases BBB permeability []. Various miRNAs are engaged in stroke-induced BBB disruptions. Overexpression of miR-150 by regulating claudin-5 expression and endothelial cell survival can decrease BBB hyperpermeability and, as a consequence, infarct volume and neurological deficit []. There is also data on BBB-protective effects of miR-130a and miR-155, due to increasing the expressions of occludin and ZO-1 [,]. miRNA-mediated pathologies such as energy failure, excitotoxicity, oxidative stress, and inflammation can induce regulated cell death in the penumbra area and, through this mechanism, extend the neurovascular damage [] Following cerebral ischemic injury, particular miRNAs (miR-214, miR-128) were proven to regulate pro-apoptotic genes by decreasing pro-apoptotic protein Bax and increasing the anti-apoptotic protein Bcl-2’s expression []. Most available human studies report solely on the expression levels of particular miRNAs in IS patients in comparison to healthy subjects []. A comprehensive review of the correlation between miRNA and clinical or anatomical features of stroke is scarce.
A recent SR and meta-analysis from Burlacu et al. reported the relationship between miRNA expression and post-stroke recovery []. In this article, the authors summarized available data on miRNA expression variability, which is related mainly to long-term neurological improvement. As a result of a comprehensive analysis, the authors suggested that miR-9 and miR-29b (isolated from neutrophils), as well as serum miR-124 and miR-125b, are the most promising biomarkers for follow-up studies. The results are only partially consistent with the present SR, probably due to different approaches to the timing of miRNA testing and clinical assessments. Similarly to Burlacu’s work, studies included in the present SR supported the data on miR-9, miR-29b, miR-124, and miR-125b relevance in IS. However, our analysis revealed contradictory findings on the correlation between miR-9 and miR-124 expression and the clinical severity of IS. That may indicate that these fragments are not the best candidates to include in diagnostic panels for miRNA testing in IS patients. Burlacu’s SR was aimed to assess the correlation between miRNA expression and the neurologic deficit and focused on miRNAs as prognostic biomarkers. In our SR we have included studies that analyzed more clinical features associated with stroke severity (lesion volume, inflammatory markers). It is worth mentioning that in many cases all these outcomes appeared to be correlated with particular miRNA expression levels. This type of approach addresses a wider scope of pathologies in an acute period of ischemic stroke and at the same time reflects a possible role of miRNAs as mediators of pathological processes (apoptosis, inflammation, blood–brain barrier permeability). In this review, we intend to indicate the direction for designing future research protocols and identify clinical correlations that can give ground for utilizing miRNA both as possible diagnostic biomarkers and treatment targets. The SR by Burlacu et al. identified multiple shortcomings that should be addressed before including miRNA-based diagnostics in clinical practice and preparing protocols for further research. The main reported issues were the lack of studies investigating long-term outcomes, the possible discrepancy between miRNA expression in the plasma and serum, the high risk of bias, and the low sample size of many studies.
Studies included in the present SR analyzed multiple numbers of miRNA fragments in relation to important features of IS, such as clinical severity, infarct volume, inflammation, prognosis, etiology, and the risk of stroke recurrence. The protocols of these assessments were substantially alike. In the predominance of studies, blood samples for miRNA expression testing were collected just after hospital admission or within 24 h from IS onset. The clinical assessment of neurological deficit and brain imagining were conducted during the same period. Therefore, most of the clinical outcomes and infarct volumes reported in the included studies represent the acute phase of stroke, in which the central part of IS-induced brain injury takes place. It is worth noting that miRNA expression during this critical phase is probably associated with acute consequences of ischemia, such as inflammation, excitotoxicity, oxidative stress, and apoptosis []. Possible candidates for biomarkers assessed during this “time window” indicate the extent and the severity of brain damage. This may lead the way for future search for miRNA-based therapies targeting the acute phase and preventing the progression of ischemic injury. The timing of sample collection for miRNA expression assessment may be strongly associated with the role of detected fragments in stroke pathology. Edwardson et al. addressed this problem in an interesting SR article on plasma microRNA expression in correlation to markers of post-stroke recovery []. Researchers suggest plasma miRNAs may become promising biomarkers of spontaneous biological recovery following stroke. However, the period in which blood samples for miRNA testing were obtained is highly significant. Authors stress the importance of longitudinal assessments, stating that whereas fragments detected during the hyperacute phase are most probably the indicators of brain tissue damage, the miRNA fragments involved in the chronic phase may be associated with post-stroke recovery, including neuroplasticity and neuroregeneration. This shows that despite promising data on the role of miRNA expression in the course of IS, its significance is most probably strictly related to the timing of sample collection and the stage of the disease
Part of the studies included in the present SR assessed the neurologic deficit in long-term follow-up [,,,,]. Most of the protocols, however, did not perform repetitive assessments. To implement miRNA as a prognostication tool for long-term outcomes, it is important to appropriately design future protocols and include repetitive clinical and radiological follow-up of study participants. Furthermore, to assess the full spectrum of miRNA involvement in stroke pathology, serial blood testing for miRNA expression levels should be considered. Repetitive NIHSS assessment would be representative of patients’ potential for recovery and neurological improvement. This, however, should be combined with further scanning to assess the final infarct volume. The size of ischemic lesions can evolve over time, depending on various factors such as the extent of edema, reperfusion, progression of ischemia, or secondary hemorrhagic transformation. During the acute period of IS diffusion, the weighted imaging (DWI) sequence demonstrates the intracellular edema that develops within the first hours or even minutes after stroke onset []. Irreversible changes to brain tissue can be seen later (3–8 h from symptoms onset) as increased signal intensity on T2-weighted imaging []. The reversibility of intracellular edema is highly variable and associated with the level of recanalization []. Therefore, the implementation of repetitive clinical and MRI assessment combined with miRNA expression testing in future study protocols could become a tool for appointing potential miRNA markers for reversible and irreversible brain damage in the course of IS. Interestingly, none of the included studies used non-contrast computed tomography (NCCT) for infarct volume assessment. IS lesion volume measurements based on NCCT were proven reproducible and reliable [,]. Due to feasibility, common access to NCCT, and economic aspects, we can consider using it in future protocols.
The present SR aimed to assemble available data on the association between miRNA expression and clinical aspects of IS. Several limitations of our work need to be listed. Included studies have not reported a consistent method of miRNA testing. Some of the research used both plasma and serum assessment of miRNA expression; others performed tests on miRNA extracted from circulating blood cells (lymphocytes, neutrophils). The fact that numerous fragments of miRNA were assessed in analyzed studies may be associated with an additional possibility of bias. The clinical deficit was measured primarily using the NIHSS, and the assessment timing was similar (first 24 h after admission or IS onset). However, only a small number of studies provided a follow-up neurological examination. Finally, some of the research lacked data on specific types of IS treatment administered, which may additionally influence the testing results due to potential reperfusion injury in cases where thrombolysis or mechanical thrombectomy were performed [,]. We are aware that this SR would additionally benefit from statistical analysis. It is worth mentioning that despite the fact that all of the studies addressed the correlation between miRNA expression and neurological deficit, the specified primary outcomes differed. We have decided that due to the diversity in study methodologies, a narrative synthesis would provide a more comprehensive and contextually appropriate interpretation of our findings without accidentally distorting the results. Considering all of the aspects presented above, the cautious analysis of the included studies provided a sound and comprehensive summary of the available clinical data on the association between the clinical features of IS and miRNA expression in stroke patients.

5. Conclusions

miRNA expression in IS patients is significantly correlated to important stroke features, such as clinical severity, infarct volume, systemic inflammatory markers, prognosis, stroke etiology subtype, and the risk of stroke recurrence. After analyzing the available data, we have identified a set of possible miRNA fragment candidates that may be used in stroke diagnostics and have the potential to form a basis for developing future treatment protocols. The research included in the present SR indicates that miRNA expression, particularly miR-125b-5p, miR-143, miR-146b, and miR-218, with positive correlation, and miR-21, miR-93, miR-29b, miR-126, and miR-130, with negative correlation, may be significantly associated with clinical severity, infarct volume and inflammation in IS. More prospective, properly designed protocols are needed to confirm these findings and precisely assess the role of miRNA expression in the course of stroke. Future research in this area must include consistent methods of miRNA expression testing, optimized clinical assessment, and brain imagining schedules.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: K.P. and F.B.; methodology: K.P. and F.B.; formal analysis: F.B. and K.R.; writing—original draft preparation K.P.; writing—review and editing: F.B.; and supervision: F.B. and K.R. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. GBD 2016 Stroke Collaborators. Global, regional, and national burden of stroke, 1990–2016: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet Neurol. 2019, 18, 439–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Kadir, R.R.A.; Alwjwaj, M.; Bayraktutan, U. MicroRNA: An Emerging Predictive, Diagnostic, Prognostic and Therapeutic Strategy in Ischaemic Stroke. Cell Mol. Neurobiol. 2022, 42, 1301–1319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Wang, X.; Chen, S.; Ni, J.; Cheng, J.; Jia, J.; Zhen, X. miRNA-3473b contributes to neuroinflammation following cerebral ischemia. Cell Death Dis. 2018, 9, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Xu, W.; Gao, L.; Zheng, J.; Li, T.; Shao, A.; Reis, C.; Chen, S.; Zhang, J. The Roles of MicroRNAs in Stroke: Possible Therapeutic Targets. Cell Transplant. 2018, 27, 1778–1788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Winkler, L.; Blasig, R.; Breitkreuz-Korff, O.; Berndt, P.; Dithmer, S.; Helms, H.C.; Puchkov, D.; Devraj, K.; Kaya, M.; Qin, Z.; et al. Tight junctions in the blood-brain barrier promote edema formation and infarct size in stroke—Ambivalent effects of sealing proteins. J. Cereb. Blood Flow. Metab. 2021, 41, 132–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Roitbak, T. MicroRNAs and Regeneration in Animal Models of CNS Disorders. Neurochem. Res. 2020, 45, 188–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Burlacu, C.C.; Ciobanu, D.; Badulescu, A.V.; Chelaru, V.-F.; Mitre, A.-O.; Capitanescu, B.; Hermann, D.M.; Popa-Wagner, A. Circulating MicroRNAs and Extracellular Vesicle-Derived MicroRNAs as Predictors of Functional Recovery in Ischemic Stroke Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 24, 251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Ho, P.T.B.; Clark, I.M.; Le, L.T.T. MicroRNA-Based Diagnosis and Therapy. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 7167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  9. Vijayan, M.; Reddy, P.H. Peripheral biomarkers of stroke: Focus on circulatory microRNAs. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA) Mol. Basis Dis. 2016, 1862, 1984–1993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Sun, P.; Liu, D.Z.; Jickling, G.C.; Sharp, F.R.; Yin, K.J. MicroRNA-based therapeutics in central nervous system injuries. J. Cereb. Blood Flow. Metab. 2018, 38, 1125–1148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Toyoda, K.; Yoshimura, S.; Nakai, M.; Koga, M.; Sasahara, Y.; Sonoda, K.; Kamiyama, K.; Yazawa, Y.; Kawada, S.; Sasaki, M.; et al. Twenty-Year Change in Severity and Outcome of Ischemic and Hemorrhagic Strokes. JAMA Neurol. 2022, 79, 61–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Prus, K.; Bilotta, F.; Akça, B. Relationship Between the Expression of Specific Types of miRNA in Acute Ischemic Stroke Anatomic and Clinical Stroke Severity (Acute and Long Term). PROSPERO 2023 CRD42023472594. Available online: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42023472594 (accessed on 30 November 2024).
  13. Hammer, B.; Virgili, E.; Bilotta, F. Evidence-based literature review: De-duplication a cornerstone for quality. World J. Methodol. 2023, 13, 390–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. McGuinness, L.A.; Higgins, J.P.T. Risk-of-bias VISualization (robvis): An R package and Shiny web app for visualizing risk-of-bias assessments. Res. Syn. Meth. 2020, 12, 55–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Haddaway, N.R.; Page, M.J.; Pritchard, C.C.; McGuinness, L.A. PRISMA2020: An R package and Shiny app for producing PRISMA 2020-compliant flow diagrams, with interactivity for optimised digital transparency and Open Synthesis. Campbell Syst. Rev. 2022, 18, e1230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Chen, Y.; Song, Y.; Huang, J.; Qu, M.; Zhang, Y.; Geng, J.; Zhang, Z.; Liu, J.; Yang, G.-Y. Increased Circulating Exosomal miRNA-223 Is Associated with Acute Ischemic Stroke. Front. Neurol. 2017, 8, 57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Chen, Z.; Wang, K.; Huang, J.; Zheng, G.; Lv, Y.; Luo, N.; Liang, M.; Huang, L. Upregulated Serum MiR-146b Serves as a Biomarker for Acute Ischemic Stroke. Cell. Physiol. Biochem. 2018, 45, 397–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Ji, Q.; Ji, Y.; Peng, J.; Zhou, X.; Chen, X.; Zhao, H.; Xu, T.; Chen, L.; Xu, Y. Increased Brain-Specific MiR-9 and MiR-124 in the Serum Exosomes of Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0163645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Jin, F.; Xing, J. Circulating miR-126 and miR-130a levels correlate with lower disease risk, disease severity, and reduced inflammatory cytokine levels in acute ischemic stroke patients. Neurol. Sci. 2018, 39, 1757–1765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Jin, F.; Xing, J. Circulating pro-angiogenic and anti-angiogenic microRNA expressions in patients with acute ischemic stroke and their association with disease severity. Neurol. Sci. 2017, 38, 2015–2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Liang, J.; Zhang, Z. Higher Peripheral Blood MiR-488 Level Predicts Poor Prognosis of Acute Ischemic Stroke. Clin. Lab. 2020, 66, 1391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Liang, T.Y.; Lou, J.Y. Increased Expression of mir-34a-5p and Clinical Association in Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients and in a Rat Model. Med. Sci. Monit. 2016, 22, 2950–2955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  23. Liu, Y.; Zhang, J.; Han, R.; Liu, H.; Sun, D.; Liu, X. Downregulation of serum brain specific microRNA is associated with inflammation and infarct volume in acute ischemic stroke. J. Clin. Neurosci. 2015, 22, 291–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Liu, C.; Huang, H.; Li, Y.; Zhao, H. The relationship of long non-coding RNA maternally expressed gene 3 with microRNA-21 and their correlation with acute ischemic stroke risk, disease severity and recurrence risk. Clin. Neurol. Neurosurg. 2021, 210, 106940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Liu, P.; Han, Z.; Ma, Q.; Liu, T.; Wang, R.; Tao, Z.; Li, G.; Li, F.; Zhang, S.; Li, L.; et al. Upregulation of MicroRNA-128 in the Peripheral Blood of Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients is Correlated with Stroke Severity Partially through Inhibition of Neuronal Cell Cycle Reentry. Cell Transplant. 2019, 28, 839–850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Ma, X.; Yun, H.J.; Elkin, K.; Guo, Y.; Ding, Y.; Li, G. MicroRNA-29b Suppresses Inflammation and Protects Blood-Brain Barrier Integrity in Ischemic Stroke. Mediat. Inflamm. 2022, 2022, 1755416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Mostafa, S.; Al Masry, H.; Hussein, M.; Abd Elkareem, R.M.; Masoud, M.M. The potential role of micro-RNA 125b-5p level in predicting outcome from thrombolytic therapy in patients with acute ischemic stroke. J. Thromb. Thrombolysis 2023, 56, 275–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Rahmati, M.; Azarpazhooh, M.R.; Ehteram, H.; Ferns, G.A.; Ghayour-Mobarhan, M.; Ghannadan, H.; Mobarra, N. The elevation of S100B and downregulation of circulating miR-602 in the sera of ischemic stroke (IS) patients: The emergence of novel diagnostic and prognostic markers. Neurol. Sci. 2020, 41, 2185–2192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Song, P.; Sun, H.; Chen, H.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, Q. Decreased Serum Exosomal miR-152-3p Contributes to the Progression of Acute Ischemic Stroke. Clin. Lab. 2020, 66, 1615–1622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Wang, Q.; Wang, F.; Fu, F.; Liu, J.; Sun, W.; Chen, Y. Diagnostic and prognostic value of serum miR-9-5p and miR-128-3p levels in early-stage acute ischemic stroke. Clinics 2021, 76, e2958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Wang, Y.; Huang, J.; Ma, Y.; Tang, G.; Liu, Y.; Chen, X.; Zhang, Z.; Zeng, L.; Wang, Y.; Ouyang, Y.-B.; et al. MicroRNA-29b is a therapeutic target in cerebral ischemia associated with aquaporin 4. J. Cereb. Blood Flow. Metab. 2015, 35, 1977–1984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Xiang, W.; Tian, C.; Lin, J.; Wu, X.; Pang, G.; Zhou, L.; Pan, S.; Deng, Z. Plasma let-7i and miR-15a expression are associated with the effect of recombinant tissue plasminogen activator treatment in acute ischemic stroke patients. Thromb. Res. 2017, 158, 121–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Xue, Y.; Li, M.; Liu, D.; Zhu, Q.; Chen, H. Expression of miR-9 in the serum of patients with acute ischemic stroke and its effect on neuronal damage. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Pathol. 2018, 11, 5885–5892. [Google Scholar] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  34. Zhong, C.; Yin, C.; Niu, G.; Ning, L.; Pan, J. MicroRNA miR-497 is closely associated with poor prognosis in patients with cerebral ischemic stroke. Bioengineered 2021, 12, 2851–2862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  35. Zhou, J.; Chen, L.; Chen, B.; Huang, S.; Zeng, C.; Wu, H.; Chen, C.; Long, F. Increased serum exosomal miR-134 expression in the acute ischemic stroke patients. BMC Neurol. 2018, 18, 198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Zhou, X.; Qi, L. miR-124 Is Downregulated in Serum of Acute Cerebral Infarct Patients and Shows Diagnostic and Prognostic Value. Clin. Appl. Thromb. Hemost. 2021, 27, 10760296211035446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  37. Zhu, X.; Ding, J.; Wang, B.; Wang, J.; Xu, M. Circular RNA DLGAP4 is down-regulated and negatively correlates with severity, inflammatory cytokine expression and pro-inflammatory gene miR-143 expression in acute ischemic stroke patients. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Pathol. 2019, 12, 941–948. [Google Scholar] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  38. Guo, C.; Zhong, C.; Li, Q.; Gao, Y.; Li, W.; Ou, Y. Expressions and neural function prognostic evaluation of serum microRNA-24 and microRNA-29b in elderly patients with acute ischemic stroke. Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue 2020, 32, 78–82. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  39. He, X.W.; Shi, Y.H.; Liu, Y.S.; Li, G.-F.; Zhao, R.; Hu, Y.; Lin, C.-C.; Zhuang, M.-T.; Su, J.-J.; Liu, J.-R. Increased plasma levels of miR-124-3p, miR-125b-5p and miR-192-5p are associated with outcomes in acute ischaemic stroke patients receiving thrombolysis. Atherosclerosis 2019, 289, 36–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. He, X.W.; Shi, Y.H.; Zhao, R.; Liu, Y.-S.; Li, G.-F.; Hu, Y.; Chen, W.; Cui, G.-H.; Su, J.-J.; Liu, J.-R. Plasma Levels of miR-125b-5p and miR-206 in Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients After Recanalization Treatment: A Prospective Observational Study. J. Stroke Cerebrovasc. Dis. 2019, 28, 1654–1661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Ma, Q.; Li, G.; Tao, Z.; Wang, J.; Wang, R.; Liu, P.; Luo, Y.; Zhao, H. Blood microRNA-93 as an indicator for diagnosis and prediction of functional recovery of acute stroke patients. J. Clin. Neurosci. 2019, 62, 121–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Rainer, T.H.; Leung, L.Y.; Chan, C.P.Y.; Leung, Y.K.; Abrigo, J.M.; Wang, D.; Graham, C.A. Plasma miR-124-3p and miR-16 concentrations as prognostic markers in acute stroke. Clin. Biochem. 2016, 49, 663–668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Khoshnam, S.E.; Winlow, W.; Farzaneh, M.; Farbood, Y.; Moghaddam, H.F. Pathogenic mechanisms following ischemic stroke. Neurol. Sci. 2017, 38, 1167–1186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Pan, J.; Qu, M.; Li, Y.; Wang, L.; Zhang, L.; Wang, Y.; Tang, Y.; Tian, H.-L.; Zhang, Z.; Yang, G.-Y. MicroRNA-126-3p/-5p Overexpression Attenuates Blood-Brain Barrier Disruption in a Mouse Model of Middle Cerebral Artery Occlusion. Stroke 2020, 51, 619–627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Tian, C.; Li, Z.; Yang, Z.; Huang, Q.; Liu, J.; Hong, B. Plasma MicroRNA-16 Is a Biomarker for Diagnosis, Stratification, and Prognosis of Hyperacute Cerebral Infarction. PLoS ONE. 2016, 11, e0166688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Ramiro, L.; Simats, A.; García-Berrocoso, T.; Montaner, J. Inflammatory molecules might become both biomarkers and therapeutic targets for stroke management. Ther. Adv. Neurol. Disord. 2018, 11, 1756286418789340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Fang, Z.; He, Q.W.; Li, Q.; Chen, X.L.; Baral, S.; Jin, H.J.; Zhu, Y.Y.; Li, M.; Xia, Y.P.; Mao, L.; et al. MicroRNA-150 regulates blood-brain barrier permeability via Tie-2 after permanent middle cerebral artery occlusion in rats. FASEB J. 2016, 30, 2097–2107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Caballero-Garrido, E.; Pena-Philippides, J.C.; Lordkipanidze, T.; Bragin, D.; Yang, Y.; Erhardt, E.B.; Roitbak, T. In Vivo Inhibition of miR-155 Promotes Recovery after Experimental Mouse Stroke. J. Neurosci. 2015, 35, 12446–12464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Wang, Y.; Wang, M.D.; Xia, Y.P.; Gao, Y.; Zhu, Y.Y.; Chen, S.C.; Mao, L.; He, Q.W.; Yue, Z.Y.; Hu, B. MicroRNA-130a regulates cerebral ischemia-induced blood-brain barrier permeability by targeting Homeobox A5. FASEB J. 2018, 32, 935–944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Rakkar, K.; Bayraktutan, U. Increases in intracellular calcium perturb blood-brain barrier via protein kinase C-alpha and apoptosis. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2016, 1862, 56–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Dewdney, B.; Trollope, A.; Moxon, J.; Thomas Manapurathe, D.; Biros, E.; Golledge, J. Circulating MicroRNAs as Biomarkers for Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Systematic Review. J. Stroke Cerebrovasc. Dis. 2018, 27, 522–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Edwardson, M.A.; Zhong, X.; Fiandaca, M.S.; Federoff, H.J.; Cheema, A.K.; Dromerick, A.W. Plasma MicroRNA Markers of Upper Limb Recovery Following Human Stroke. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 12558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Čivrný, J.; Tomáš, D.; Černá, M. MRI of cerebral oedema in ischaemic stroke and its current use in routine clinical practice. Neuroradiology 2024, 66, 305–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Leiva-Salinas, C.; Wintermark, M. Imaging of acute ischemic stroke. Neuroimaging Clin. N. Am. 2010, 20, 455–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  55. Nagaraja, N.; Forder, J.R.; Warach, S.; Merino, J.G. Reversible diffusion-weighted imaging lesions in acute ischemic stroke: A systematic review. Neurology 2020, 94, 571–587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Gauriau, R.; Bizzo, B.C.; Comeau, D.S.; Hillis, J.M.; Bridge, C.P.; Chin, J.K.; Pawar, J.; Pourvaziri, A.; Sesic, I.; Sharaf, E.; et al. Head CT deep learning model is highly accurate for early infarct estimation. Sci. Rep. 2023, 13, 189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. van der Worp, H.B.; Claus, S.P.; Bär, P.R.; Ramos, L.M.P.; Algra, A.; van Gijn, J.; Kappelle, L.J. Reproducibility of measurements of cerebral infarct volume on CT scans. Stroke 2001, 32, 424–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Neag, M.A.; Mitre, A.O.; Burlacu, C.C.; Inceu, A.-I.; Mihu, C.; Melincovici, C.-S.; Bichescu, M.; Buzoianu, A.-D. miRNA Involvement in Cerebral Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury. Front. Neurosci. 2022, 16, 901360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Gendosz de Carrillo, D.; Kocikowska, O.; Rak, M.; Krzan, A.; Student, S.; Jędrzejowska-Szypułka, H.; Pawletko, K.; Lasek-Bal, A. The Relevance of Reperfusion Stroke Therapy for miR-9-3p and miR-9-5p Expression in Acute Stroke-A Preliminary Study. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 2766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Article Metrics

Citations

Article Access Statistics

Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.