Skip to Content
Future InternetFuture Internet
  • Editorial
  • Open Access

11 March 2026

Machine Learning and IoT as Enablers of Intelligent Industrial Transformation

and
1
Faculty of Systems, Electronics and Industrial Engineering, Universidad Tecnica de Ambato (UTA), Ambato 180206, Ecuador
2
Department of Systems Engineering and Automation, University of the Basque Country (EHU/UPV), 48013 Bilbao, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.

1. Introduction

The rapid expansion of cyber-physical systems, sensor networks, and data-driven automation platforms has profoundly reconfigured the operational logic of contemporary industrial environments. Within the paradigm of the Fourth Industrial Revolution—commonly designated as Industry 4.0—the convergence of machine learning (ML) and the Internet of Things (IoT) has emerged as a defining technological axis, reshaping processes that range from real-time monitoring and predictive maintenance to supply chain optimisation and cybersecurity [1,2,3]. This Special Issue was conceived at this intersection, with the purpose of consolidating peer-reviewed contributions that advance both the theoretical foundations and the practical deployment of ML- and IoT-based systems in industrial and related contexts.
The thematic scope of the call was deliberately broad, encompassing anomaly and intrusion detection in wireless sensor and SCADA networks, demand forecasting in supply chains, digital twin frameworks, augmented reality in industrial processes, and intelligent agricultural systems underpinned by Artificial Intelligence of Things (AIoT) architectures. This breadth reflects the interdisciplinary nature of Industry 4.0 research and the recognition that no single methodology or application domain can fully capture its complexity [4,5]. Following a rigorous double-blind review process, eight contributions were accepted—comprising original research articles and critical review papers—whose collective scope is summarised below.
Security and intrusion detection: Two contributions address cybersecurity in IoT-based networks from complementary methodological perspectives. The first [6] presents a machine learning framework optimised for wireless sensor network (WSN) environments, combining Adaptive Synthetic Sampling (ADASYN) for class-imbalance correction with a dual-stage feature selection strategy that integrates Feature Importance Selection (FIS) and Recursive Feature Elimination (RFE), followed by an XGBoost classifier trained under five-fold cross-validation. The reported overall accuracy of 99.87% confirms that explicit imbalance treatment and dimensionality reduction are critical determinants of IDS performance in resource-constrained deployments [7]. The second contribution [8] benchmarks XGBoost, LightGBM, and Random Forest under a Top-K feature selection strategy on the CICIoMT2024 dataset, finding that Random Forest achieves the best balance between predictive performance (91.7% accuracy; F1-score 93%) and computational efficiency, with a 35% reduction in processing time when restricted to the Top-10 feature subset. Together, these papers establish ensemble learning—particularly gradient-boosting variants—as a productive methodological direction for real-time IoT security applications.
Anomaly detection in industrial control systems: A third contribution [9] conducts a rigorous empirical comparison of four unsupervised anomaly detection algorithms—Autoencoder (AE), LSTM-Autoencoder (LSTM-AE), One-Class SVM (OCSVM), and Isolation Forest (IF)—applied to SCADA telemetry from an urban wind turbine characterised by an inverted class imbalance in which operational anomalies constitute 75.7% of records. The AE trained exclusively on the rare normal state achieves the highest overall performance (AUC 0.9667), while the IF, despite a strong discriminative AUC of 0.8616, fails entirely to classify the normal class ( Recall normal = 0.00 ) when the optimal F1-score threshold is applied. This result constitutes an empirically grounded demonstration of the methodological superiority of reconstruction-based approaches when the statistically dominant class corresponds to the anomalous state, and provides quantitative guidelines for threshold calibration in prognostics and health management (PHM) systems operating under non-standard distributional assumptions.
Data-driven decision support in supply chain management: The fourth contribution [10] proposes a novel Decision Support System for demand forecasting that models the prediction task as a multivariate time series problem on a causal dependency graph. A Graph Convolutional Network (GCN) captures both the temporal dynamics of each variable—including the Consumer Sentiment Index, Consumer Price Index, Personal Income, and Unemployment Rate—and the structural interdependencies encoded in the graph topology. Comparative evaluation against conventional ML baselines demonstrates that the GCN approach more accurately captures abrupt transitions in demand behaviour, where competing methods tend toward excessive smoothing. This contribution reframes demand forecasting as a graph-structured inference problem, opening productive directions for incorporating macroeconomic knowledge into operational forecasting models [11].
Operational technologies for process enhancement: Two papers address the deployment of digital twins and augmented reality (AR) in industrial process optimisation. The digital twin contribution [12] presents a comprehensive strategic framework for implementing Digital Twin (DT) technology in manufacturing environments, integrating IoT, AI, and ML to construct accurate digital replicas of production systems and enable real-time simulation, predictive maintenance, and process optimisation. A detailed case study demonstrates empirical reductions in downtime and improvements in maintenance scheduling, responding to a recognised gap between conceptual DT frameworks and empirically validated deployment guidance [13,14]. The scoping review on augmented reality [15]—conducted following PRISMA 2020 guidelines with Cochrane bias assessment—synthesises 38 articles published between 2019 and 2024. Key findings confirm that AR consistently reduces error rates and task execution times, improves training outcomes, and optimises maintenance and assembly workflows. Unity 3D is identified as the dominant graphics engine; persistent barriers include high initial costs and hardware limitations.
Systematic reviews: smart manufacturing and intelligent agriculture: The final two contributions provide field-level overviews of broader application domains. The critical review on smart manufacturing [16] surveys IoT systems and ML algorithms across security, predictive maintenance, process control, and additive manufacturing, offering a comparative analysis of architectural configurations, sensing solutions, data strategies, and communication protocols. The review on AIoT in agriculture [17]—following PRISMA 2020 guidelines and covering publications from 2018 to 2025—examines the transition from IoT-based monitoring to AIoT-driven intelligent agriculture, with particular attention to deployment challenges in low-income countries where infrastructural deficits and economic constraints constrain adoption. Applications reviewed include smart irrigation, pest detection, yield prediction, and livestock management. A tailored AIoT architecture for resource-constrained environments is proposed, integrating edge intelligence with governance and capacity-building frameworks.

2. Cross-Cutting Observations

Reading the eight contributions collectively, several cross-cutting themes merit explicit acknowledgment. The problem of data imbalance—whether standard or inverted—emerges as a persistent methodological challenge across intrusion detection, anomaly analysis, and operational classification tasks; resampling strategies and reconstruction-based unsupervised approaches represent complementary mitigation paths depending on distributional characteristics. A notable convergence toward ensemble and graph-based learning architectures is also evident: XGBoost, LightGBM, and Random Forest dominate the supervised security contributions, while GCNs are deployed for relational forecasting, consistent with the broader maturation of methods that exploit ensemble diversity and relational inductive biases. At the system level, the review articles collectively signal a shift from isolated algorithmic proposals toward integrated architectures that address the full data lifecycle—from acquisition and preprocessing through inference and decision support—reflecting the increasing operational maturity of Industry 4.0 deployments. Finally, the inclusion of a contribution specifically addressing AIoT in low-income agricultural contexts broadens the discourse beyond the typically high-income-country framing of Industry 4.0 scholarship, underscoring the potential of these technologies for sustainable and equitable development.

3. Conclusions

The eight contributions assembled in this Special Issue constitute a substantive addition to the rapidly evolving body of knowledge at the intersection of ML, IoT, and Industry 4.0. Looking forward, the deployment of ML at the network edge requires continued innovation in model compression and federated learning. Interpretability remains a critical barrier in safety-critical environments where regulatory requirements demand explainable inference. Furthermore, the extension of intelligent systems into resource-constrained and low-income contexts constitutes both a scientific challenge and a social imperative that the research community should address with equity-conscious design principles.
We extend our sincere gratitude to all authors for their rigorous and timely submissions, the reviewers whose evaluations were instrumental in ensuring scientific quality, and the editorial team for their professional coordination throughout the process.

Author Contributions

Methodology, P.A.; Formal analysis, P.A. and M.V.G.; Writing—original draft, M.V.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Javaid, M.; Haleem, A.; Singh, R.P.; Suman, R.; Gonzalez, E.S. Understanding the adoption of Industry 4.0 technologies in improving environmental sustainability. Sustain. Oper. Comput. 2022, 3, 203–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Teoh, Y.K.; Gill, S.S.; Parlikad, A.K. IoT and Fog-Computing-Based Predictive Maintenance Model for Effective Asset Management in Industry 4.0 Using Machine Learning. IEEE Internet Things J. 2023, 10, 2087–2094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Elsisi, M.; Mahmoud, K.; Lehtonen, M.; Darwish, M.M.F. Reliable industry 4.0 based on machine learning and IOT for analyzing, monitoring, and securing smart meters. Sensors 2021, 21, 487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Rahman, S.; Ghosh, T.; Aurna, N.; Kaiser, S.; Anannya, M.; Hosen, S. Machine learning and internet of things in industry 4.0: A review. Meas. Sens. 2023, 28, 100822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Xu, L.D.; Xu, E.L.; Li, L. Industry 4.0: State of the art and future trends. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2018, 56, 2941–2962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Munaye, Y.Y.; Gebeyehu, A.D.; Tai, L.C.; Abebe, Z.A.; Workneh, A.B.; Tarekegn, R.B.; Chekol, Y.B.; Tarekegn, G.B. Machine Learning-Driven Intrusion Detection for Securing IoT-Based Wireless Sensor Networks. Future Internet 2026, 18, 113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Fernández, A.; García, S.; Galar, M.; Prati, R.C.; Krawczyk, B.; Herrera, F. Learning from Imbalanced Data Sets; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2018; Volume 10. [Google Scholar]
  8. Kouassi, B.M.; Ballo, A.B.; Ayikpa, K.J.; Mamadou, D.; Coulibaly, M.Z.J. Top-K Feature Selection for IoT Intrusion Detection: Contributions of XGBoost, LightGBM, and Random Forest. Future Internet 2025, 17, 529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Pawlik, L. Evaluating Reconstruction-Based and Proximity-Based Methods: A Four-Way Comparison (AE, LSTM-AE, OCSVM, IF) in SCADA Anomaly Detection Under Inverted Imbalance. Future Internet 2026, 18, 96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Sifuentes-Domínguez, S.; Mejia-Muñoz, J.M.; Cruz-Mejia, O.; Pizarro-Gurrola, R.; Domínguez-Flores, A.S.; Ortega-Máynez, L. Predicting Demand in Supply Chain Management: A Decision Support System Using Graph Convolutional Networks. Future Internet 2026, 18, 26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Kipf, T.N.; Welling, M. Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networks. arXiv 2016, arXiv:1609.02907. [Google Scholar]
  12. Fantozzi, I.C.; Santolamazza, A.; Loy, G.; Schiraldi, M.M. Digital Twins: Strategic Guide to Utilize Digital Twins to Improve Operational Efficiency in Industry 4.0. Future Internet 2025, 17, 41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Grieves, M.; Vickers, J. Digital Twin: Mitigating Unpredictable, Undesirable Emergent Behavior in Complex Systems. In Transdisciplinary Perspectives on Complex Systems; Springer International Publishing: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2016; pp. 85–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Tao, F.; Zhang, H.; Liu, A.; Nee, A.Y.C. Digital Twin in Industry: State-of-the-Art. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inform. 2019, 15, 2405–2415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Miranda, A.; Vallejo, A.M.; Ayala, P.; Garcia, M.V.; Naranjo, J.E. Enhancing Industrial Processes Through Augmented Reality: A Scoping Review. Future Internet 2025, 17, 358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Visconti, P.; Rausa, G.; Del-Valle-Soto, C.; Velázquez, R.; Cafagna, D.; De Fazio, R. Machine Learning and IoT-Based Solutions in Industrial Applications for Smart Manufacturing: A Critical Review. Future Internet 2024, 16, 394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Kasereka, S.K.; Mbayandjambe, A.M.; Bazie, I.G.; Zeufack, H.F.; Ocama, O.V.; Hassan, E.; Kyamakya, K.; Tashev, T. From IoT to AIoT: Evolving Agricultural Systems Through Intelligent Connectivity in Low-Income Countries. Future Internet 2026, 18, 82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

Short Biography of Authors

Futureinternet 18 00141 i001Paulina Ayala is an Electronics and Communications Engineer from the Technical University of Ambato, holding a Master’s degree in Evaluation and Audit of Technological Systems from the University of the Armed Forces ESPE. Since 2016, she has been a lecturer at the Technical University of Ambato and has actively participated in several research projects focused on the development and implementation of cutting-edge technological solutions.
Futureinternet 18 00141 i002Marcelo V. García He studied electronics and instrumentation engineering at the University of the Armed Forces-ESPE. In 2013 he obtained his Master’s Degree in Control, Automation, and Robotics Engineering and in 2018 he obtained his doctorate at the University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU). His studies were carried out thanks to a grant from the Ecuadorian government. From 2008 to 2013 he worked as an engineer in different companies in the area of oil and gas in Ecuador such as Schlumberger, Petrobras and Petroamazonas EP. His research interest is focused on the design of next-generation architectures based on Industry 4.0 in various domains such as automation and smart manufacturing.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Article Metrics

Citations

Article Access Statistics

Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.